Thursday, July 9, 2020
Home Opinions This is how the center can build Ram Mandir in Ayodhya

This is how the center can build Ram Mandir in Ayodhya

Also Read

 

The question that whether we will be able to offer our prayers at the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya in our lifetime has haunted our previous generation and it has started to haunt us now. The dispute began in 1853 when the Nirmohi Akhara staked claim on the Masjid and even after so many years, in 2019, there is still no solution in sight. Although the matter is in the Apex Court what the people have been getting is “Taarikh pe taarikh”. In such a scenario a question arises… Does the center have enough authority to build the mandir and when can they start building the Mandir?

Well the answer to this is YES! The government can build the Ram Mandir wherever it wants and whenever it wants and that too within the legal and constitutional framework of the country.

The present case in Supreme Court on Ram Mandir is strictly restricted to The Title. The Supreme Court will strictly treat the dispute as a mere land dispute and then later determine who the actual owner of the land is.

Till 1978, Right to property was a fundamental right. But after the 44th amendment to the constitution, it became a constitutional right. Article 300A, introduced by the amendment, states that, Persons not to be deprived of property save by authority of law. No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law. This means that, the government may deprive a person of his property for greater public use by paying them fair and adequate compensations under the provisions of Land Acquisition act.

On December 7th 1992, a day after the Masjid demolition, the Narashimha Rao government acquired about 67 acres of land in and around the disputed site though an ordinance – The Acquisition of certain areas of Ayodhya Act.  The same was challenged by Ismail Faruqui in the Supreme Court where a Constitutional bench gave a verdict in 1994 that –“a mosque is not an essential part of the practice of Islam and hence could be acquired by the state.”

So as of today, the government is owner of the land and if the government wants, they can hand over the land to anyone they want including, the VHP or the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas who can then begin the construction of Ram Mandir. And when the Supreme Court decides on the title and say who the actual owner of the disputed site is, the government can then pay fair and adequate compensation to the party under article 300A.

 

On 29th January, the government has sought permission from the Supreme Court to return land that it has held for over two decades to the original owners. It contends that of the 67 acres of land in question, only 0.313 acres are disputed and currently being heard in the Supreme Court. A large portion of the 67 acres of land originally belonged to the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, a trust geared towards the construction of the Ram Mandir.

This seems as a great development on the path of construction of the Mandir. But legally speaking, the government has the authority to handover even the 0.313 acres of land to interested parties for the construction of the Mandir.

As a Hindu I sincerely hope that the government fast-tracks the process and we can see the construction of the temple begin at least in the second half of this year.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Latest News

The Mafia and the anti-Hindu Propaganda; all in the name of Sushant Singh Rajput

Quite interestingly when the impact of underworld on Bollywood is reducing, intellectual terrorism is increasing in various forms.

इत्तेफ़ाक देखिए जिस बोर्ड ने उन्हें टीम में नहीं दी जगह आज उसी बोर्ड के वह प्रेसिडेंट बनें बैठे है; दादा के जन्मदिन पर...

प्रिंस ऑफ कोलकाता से लेकर क्रिकेट के सबसे बड़े पद पर काबिज़ होना; हर मामले में दादा बेजोड़ है। जिनका कोई जोड़ नहीं।

It is need of an hour to adopt post pandemic work culture seriously

Physical and social distancing does not means distancing with your personal virtues of politeness and care.

Corruption in UP Police reaches to new high: Taking lives of their own colleagues for a gangster

The real and rare face of up cops was seen during the wretched night of 2nd and 3rd July, where up police lost its 8 brave policemen in a conspired shootout at Bikru village in Kanpur district.

Arts in pre and post social media era

Looking at students within boxes of science, commerce and arts is highly myopic and to think that Arts students don’t have a bright (read heavy-pocketed) future, at worse, is archaic. Social media has done its part. It’s time to continue the conversations in the real world.

Depression: A curse for society

It is normal to be sad and upset with various events of life however if the feeling of hopelessness is on regular basis, then it is worrisome.

Recently Popular

Maharashtra students unhappy with government’s silence on SSC and HSC syllabus cuts

. With the on-going struggle of the government officials to curb the spread of SARS-COV-2 in containment areas, speculations have arisen that schools and colleges in the state may not open till August or September looking at the pace of the COVID cases rising.

Who killed Sushant?

Initially his suicide was linked with bullying and nepotism. Rhea has been already interrogated in this case. The Mumbai police has already registered a case under professional rivalry and is investigating.

Mocking the mock test

We live in a MOCK world and even the air that we breath is mock air!

Love-hate relationship between the military and social media

Defense news are LEAKED rather than SHARED on Social media. And we've to be cautious!

Striking similarities between the death of Parveen Babi and Sushant Singh Rajput: A mere co-incidence or well planned murders?

Together Rhea and Bhatt’s media statements subtly and cleverly project Sushant as some kind of a nut job like Parveen Babi, another Bhatt conjuring.