Surprised? But that’s the fact, Ambedkar’s full name was Bhimrao RAMJI Ambedkar, which certain people, political parties, and specifically left/liberal historians molds according to their convictions. They manipulate things like this so they can be benefited from the act, conveying truth to the common people is always one of their least priorities, whether it is Ancient Indian history, Mughal kings, and other incidents they all were presented after cutting the facts, adding lies and by manipulating the whole scenario.
So let us come back to RAMJI Ambedkar. I’m emphasizing so much on RAMJI because it’s the core of the whole thing. From our childhood till adult we were taught that his name was B.R Ambedkar or Babasaheb Ambedkar, but why not RAMJI? There is a very straight and simple answer to it because RAMJI didn’t fit in the narrative of those so called secular historians and parties.
It was done to portray Ambedkar as an Anti-Hindu and with RAMJI in his name, their dream cannot be true so they start using their weapon that is M.M {Manipulating and Molding history}. But Ambedkar was in fact opposite of it. Even the one who sent Ambedkar foreign for his further studies was a Brahmin. He never opposes the whole of Hinduism, he was only the critic of orthodox practices prevailing in those times in Hindu Society. RAMJI was a hardcore critic of communists as a whole{especially Marxist Theory} and Orthodox Muslim Society. But if we go on and start searching about Ambedkar all we will get is B.R Ambedkar was Anti-Hindu {not even his full name because of Ramji}.
Those political parties who now present themselves as Ambedkar biggest fan and glorify him only to get votes were the ones who tried their level best to prevent Ramji to be a member of Parliament but they fail. In 1950 the Lok Sabha election Ramji was contesting from, but gets defeated at the hands of an INC candidate, later under pressure, he was sent to Rajya Sabha.
Ramji on Ambedkar also criticized Islamic practice in South Asia, he condemned child marriage and the mistreatment of women in Muslim society.
He said “No words can adequately express the great and many evils of polygamy and concubinage, and especially as a source of misery to a Muslim woman. Take the caste system. Everybody infers that Islam must be free from slavery and caste, much of its support was derived from Islam and Islamic countries. While the prescriptions by the Prophet regarding the just and humane treatment of slaves contained in the Koran are praiseworthy, there is nothing whatever in Islam that lends support to the abolition of this curse. But if slavery has gone, caste among Musalmans has remained”.
Ramji’s views on Communism were expressed in his essay “Buddhism and Communism.” He saw Communists as willing to resort to any means to achieve proletarian revolution, including violence, while he saw democratic and peaceful measures as the best option for change. He did not see this exploitation as purely economic, theorizing that the cultural aspects of exploitation are as bad or worse than economic exploitation. Also, he did not see economic relationships as the only important aspect of human life. Ambedkar also opposed the Marxist idea of controlling all the means of production and private ownership of property.
So all the things we read in our history books are not at all true they are highly manipulated books. They are far away from reality.
Ambedkar was against orthodox Muslim and Marxist theory.
