Saturday, June 6, 2020
Home Reports Sonia Gandhi spreads blatantly false rumours, violates law

Sonia Gandhi spreads blatantly false rumours, violates law

Also Read

Author of the book “Gujarat Riots: The True Story” which gives all the details about the 2002 Gujarat riots - Godhra and thereafter.

Watch this video in which Congress interim President and former full-time party chief Sonia Gandhi addresses the nation.

Particularly see the time between 1:54 to 2:27 in this video, which is tweeted by the Congress Party itself from its official handle, which is an address to the nation by Sonia Gandhi.

In this Sonia Gandhi says: “नागरिकता संशोधन कानून भेदभावपूर्ण है। नोटबंदी की तरह एक बार फिर एक-एक व्यक्ति को अपनी एवं अपने पूर्वजों की नागरिकता साबित करने के लिए लाइन में खड़ा होना पड़ेगा”. This means: “The Citizenship Amendment Bill is discriminatory. Like during demonetization, every individual will have to stand in queue to prove his and his ancestors’ citizenship.” She also says after this that the proposed national level NRC will cause maximum damage to the weak and poor sections of the society.

Sonia Gandhi is openly spreading false rumours, and that too at a very sensitive time. When the need of the hour is to maintain calm and appeal for calm and peace in the country, she is spreading blatant inflammatory and defamatory lies. A person of the level of Sonia Gandhi, who is the President of the largest Opposition party, was, according to many accounts, the Super Prime Minister of India for 10 years from 2004-2014, and the Chairperson of NAC and the UPA, is doing blatant violation of law!

CAA is simply a one-time amnesty for minorities of Pakistan, Bangladesh & Afghanistan already in India on or before 31 Dec 2014. It is not applicable even to Hindus and other non-Muslim minorities of these countries who came to India on or after 1 January 2015. No one, NOT A SINGLE Indian citizen, has to ‘prove’ citizenship of ancestors or of himself under the CAA. Despite this, Sonia says that under CAA EVERY individual will have to stand in queue to prove his and his ancestors’ citizenship. Legal action needs to be taken against Sonia Gandhi for spreading false rumours and blatantly lying and misleading the whole country in a disgusting way.

When the proposed national-level NRC has not been introduced at all, its draft too is not yet made, Sonia already claims that the national level NRC will cause maximum damage to the weak and poor sections of the society. This is further scaremongering and baseless claims by Sonia Gandhi.


Of course, all this has been totally ignored by the mainstream media. Imagine if any big BJP leader, say L K Advani, had made an incorrect claim on such a major issue during the UPA era. Or, even in the present Narendra Modi rule. A large section of the mainstream media would have crucified him or her.

Here, the whole media has let Sonia Gandhi go scot-free since a large section of it is an interested party in the conflict, wanting to spread false rumours to somehow defame the Modi Government and paint it as anti-Muslim, wanting violence and protests so that the government is on the defensive, rather than a neutral reporter of facts.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Author of the book “Gujarat Riots: The True Story” which gives all the details about the 2002 Gujarat riots - Godhra and thereafter.

Latest News

पंडित नेहरू की गलतियां जिसे आज भी भुगत रहा हिन्दुस्तान

1962 की हार सेना की हार नहीं थी बल्कि राजनैतिक नेतृत्व की हार थी। राजनैतिक नेतृत्व में गलतियां की थी इसकी वजह से हुआ था। 1962 में चीन के साथ युद्ध से ठीक पहले यही हो रहा था। प्रधानमंत्री जवाहरलाल नेहरू और जनरल थिमैया से जुड़ी हुई कहानी है।

Covid-19 and racism: How did the Indians react?

The victims of ‘ethnicity-based racism’ are people from the North-East states of India. The main reason behind such racism is that they do not look like ‘Indians’! Even after 73 years of independence, India does not know the history of its North-East.

Curious case of marginalisation of Hindus: A report on institutionalised discrimination against Hindu majority population by secular nation state of India.

Hindus who are religious minority in various states and union territories are not beneficiary of various schemes run by our secular govt despite their low representation in administration or their socio-economic backwardness in their respective states where they are religious minority.

आबादी: समस्या या बहाना?

जब सीमित संसाधनों वाले भारत देश को विकास की तरफ ले जाना था, तो जहां इंदिरा गांधी ने 'हम दो हमारे दो' की बात की, जिससे आबादी की बढ़ोत्तरी में कमी आए, तब उत्तर भारत के वामपंथी सोच के तथाकथित सोशलिस्ट नेता अपने-अपने वोट-बैंक के लिए 'जिसकी जितनी संख्या भारी, उसकी उतनी हिस्सेदारी (संसाधन लेने में, टैक्स भरने में नहीं)' का राग अलाप रहे थे।

केंद्रीय स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय ने फिर से खोलने वाले स्थानों के लिए एक मानक संचालन प्रक्रिया (SPO) की जारी

जैसा कि अनलॉक India का पहला चरण सोमवार से लागू हो गया है, केंद्रीय स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय ने (Covid-19) को फिर से खोलने वाले स्थानों में फैलाने के लिए एक मानक संचालन प्रक्रिया (SPO) जारी की है।

India needs to support ‘Free Tibet’ and rectify the mistake of Nehruvian era

According to Claude Arpi, a French expert on Tibet and China, said, Without Delhi’s active support, the Chinese troops would not have been able to survive in Tibet."

Recently Popular

The journey of anti-CAA virus in the U.S.: A tale of three cities

Kshama Sawant, a Hindu immigrant embraces Hindu phobic ideology and lead an anti-India campaign to seek a stage for her future political dreams.

Differences between natural religions and reactionary religions

It is the distinction between idol worshipers and idol smashers, the distinction between cow worshipers and beef eaters,the distinction between Devi worshipers and women offenders, the distinction between the sacredness of marriage and the system of Halala.

SATYAN NASTI PARO DHARMA: An answer to Fatima Khan

Crypto-coded language used by writer is indicative of the fact that the involved forensic expert is biased, his report can be directed against one community and union HM is probably a partition .

Were Kashmiri Pandits cowards to have left Kashmir in 1990?

Had Kashmiri Pandits capitulated and chanted “Azadi”, India would have lost Kashmir there and then. Mull over it.

Corona and a new breed of social media intellectuals

Opposing an individual turned into opposing betterment of your own country and countrymen.