Thursday, October 1, 2020
Home Opinions The hard truth about Masood Azhar, China and UN listing

The hard truth about Masood Azhar, China and UN listing

Also Read

Devi Prasad Rao
An social entrepreneur with a keen interest in current affairs, policy and strategy. Proud Indian, proud Hindu.

On Thursday morning, India woke up to the news that China has, for the fourth time, placed a “technical hold” on India’s bid to designate Masood Azhar, the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) chief, as a global terrorist.

Before we embark on a “boycott Chinese goods” and “China has blood on its hands” hysteria, there are two critical aspects that we, Indians, have to comprehend:

  1. Value systems and expected behaviours are different for individuals and nations. Naked ambition, power grabs, dual standards are all unacceptable when it comes to an individual. But as nations, their sole aim would be to further self-interest.

There can be no doubt that what China has done reeks of hypocrisy. As per the Chinese Communist Party, the Nobel Peace Laureate, a Buddhist spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama is a terrorist but a venom-spouting, jihadist is not, because both positions, although contrary, further Chinese self-interest. If Masood Azhar were to call for Jihad against China for its treatment of Uyghurs, he, his extended family and every one of his supporters would be liquidated in seconds.

India trying to shame China for its stand would never rankle China because nation-states are not expected to have a conscience, only self-interests. The question we need to ask is how to make it the designating of Masood Azhar as a global terrorist in China’s best interest?

Azhar has to safeguard his reputation as a defender of Islam and he must be forced to speak out about China’s own suppression of Islam. India must covertly invest in raising the awareness of the conditions of China’s Muslim minority. The justification of China’s actions against its Muslim minorities by the Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammed Bin Salman, during his recent visit to Beijing, shows how daunting this task is but it must be undertaken, covertly.

  1. Fighting terrorism originating from Pakistan is India’s battle. We must learn to fight our own battles before we expect outside support. Have we done enough to fight this menace? The answer is a resounding no. We have constantly indulged in seeking the high moral ground, mouthing platitudes such as “Wuhan spirit”, “Strategic restraint”, being appreciated for statesmanship which is wonderful in an idealistic world while in the world of real-politic, we concede ground. A UN-listing is another “feel-good” victory. Pakistan already has 139 individuals and entities designated by the UN as terrorists, all freely operating. With this listing, the number changes to 140.

India doesn’t need “moral victories” but hard-hitting, tangible, real victories. This would happen only if we repeatedly demonstrate that we have the gumption to fight our own battles. A few of the non-military steps that India must undertake are:

    1. Call for a Joint Session of Parliament and declare Pakistan a terror state.
    2. Impose sanctions, make it an offence to have business interests in Pakistan after a certain cut-off date and still do business with India. Businesses would have to make a hard choice: accessing the Indian or Pakistani market. Any business that chooses Pakistan would be liable to have their assets in India attached and auctioned. Specific waivers need to be applied for, justified and granted by the Government of India on a case-to-case basis, based on one single parameter; India’s self-interest. If the Indian Government shows that it means business, the Pakistani market would witness an exodus of Chinese mobile manufactures and Fortune 500 companies. The Chinese Communist Party is heavily invested in their private sector and pressure on the Chinese Government to accede to India’s wishes is inevitable.
    3. Declare that all foreigners visiting Pakistan after a cut-off date and entering the country would be subject to debriefing, a euphemism for detention, harassment and even deportation, for making the mistake of entering a terrorist state. No self-respecting business executive, scholar, artist or sportsman would step into Pakistan.
    4. Deny right of overhead passage for flights originating from Pakistan or heading to Pakistan.
    5. Once Pakistan has been declared a terrorist state, we should call for the boycott of Pakistani sportspersons internationally. Not a sporting power, India should start by either arm-twisting the ICC or creating a parallel cricketing body and attract cricketing stars to the India-promoted body rather than ICC. The last two steps will ensure the demise of PSL. In any case, the cricketing world’s center of gravity has shifted from Lords to Eden Garden. This would merely formalise the shift. For naysayers, India has done something similar in regional geopolitics by side lining SAARC and promoting BIMSTEC, thereby leaving out Pakistan.

Elections may have been declared but the Government of India is not a lame-duck government. The Model Code of Conduct is not applicable to foreign relations, foreign trade or national security matters. The Government is fully empowered to proceed in all these matter.

However, the BJP should control its motor-mouths as trying to gain electoral benefit from any of these will backfire domestically, attract the ire of the press, the opposition and the EC. Today’s voter is smart and will attribute the credit where it rightfully belongs, to us as a nation.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Devi Prasad Rao
An social entrepreneur with a keen interest in current affairs, policy and strategy. Proud Indian, proud Hindu.

Latest News

Tejasvi Surya and ideological commitment

In his (still) short Parliamentary career, Tejasvi Surya has raised voice on various issues of both national and regional importance. This includes subjects ranging from- the use of Kannada language in banking to his views on broad Banking sector in recently completed session.

Courts are not always heroes and Legislatures are not always villains

Is the constitution a strait jacket? No, it leaves a plenty of room to change and it makes no attempt to regulate every aspect of human life.

Amnesty or travesty

Why they are afraid to disclose their funding? Why only 10% registered NGOs file their balance-sheets with Registrar of Societies? No NGO is ready to answer these questions except for playing victim card.

“माल है क्या?” देश में माल की कमी से जूझता ड्रगवुड, प्रधानमंत्री क्यों है खामोश

2014 से पहले मुझे बराबर मेरा माल मिलता था लेकिन जब से आपकी सरकार आई है तब से धीमे धीमे माल की कमी से मुझे जूझना पड़ रहा है। साल 2017 तो मेरे लिए इतना खराब रहा कि नशा पाने के लिए मात्र फोन से ही काम चलाना पड़ता है।

Reforms needed in Indian education system post-COVID-19

The present scenario has jeopardised the educational ecosystem to achieve its objectives. In this regard, multifront reforms are needed for the efficient functioning of the education system in the post-COVID-19 era.

Influence or ignorance?

Finding Bilkis Dadi in 100 influential people for 2020, I started my research on her and was astonished to see except for a convenient interview with Rana Ayyub, she literally has no idea what she is fighting for.

Recently Popular

Daredevil of Indian Army: Para SF Major Mohit Sharma’s who became Iftikaar Bhatt to kill terrorists

Such brave souls of Bharat Mata who knows every minute of their life may become the last minute.

पोषण अभियान: सही पोषण – देश रोशन

भारत सरकार द्वारा कुपोषण को दूर करने के लिए जीवनचक्र एप्रोच अपनाकर चरणबद्ध ढंग से पोषण अभियान चलाया जा रहा है, भारत...

New Education Policy- Winning the world with the Bharat centric Values

The NEP is an ambitious document, which is focused on the holistic and overall development of the students to make them Aatmnirbhar and to enable them to compete with the world while maintaining the Bharat centric values and culture.

सामाजिक भेदभाव: कारण और निवारण

भारत में व्याप्त सामाजिक असामानता केवल एक वर्ग विशेष के साथ जिसे कि दलित कहा जाता है के साथ ही व्यापक रूप से प्रभावी है परंतु आर्थिक असमानता को केवल दलितों में ही व्याप्त नहीं माना जा सकता।

You will be shocked to find who testified against Bhagat Singh in the landmark case ‘Union of India Vs Bhagat Singh’

The two men who witnessed against Bhagat Singh were Indians and their descendants enjoy a healthy social positions.