Monday, July 13, 2020
Home Media Section of Indian media tries to emasculate Indian response to terror

Section of Indian media tries to emasculate Indian response to terror

Also Read


One would have expected that the robust Indian response to the Pulwama terror attack would send a wave of self-confidence through the Indian people and the commentariat. For the longest time, the countrymen have asked for an aggressive response to acts of Pakistan-inspired terror attacks, only to settle for lame diplomatic gestures.

So, when the Indian forces finally gave our neighbors a taste of what they are capable of, through the air strikes on the Jaish-e-Mohammed terror camp in Balakote, it should have resulted in a unanimous approval and assertion of self-confidence.

Alas, how committed certain sections of the Indian intelligentsia are to the idea of a weak India, perpetually suffering excesses without having recourse to any kind of aggressive response, became clear in the aftermath of these spectacular operations.

On the very day – February 26th – when this action took place, some members of Indian media were busy trying to create a fear psychosis among the ordinary people about the possible reprisal from Pakistani side.

This sinister move was led by, who else, Rajdeep Sardesai on India Today. In a show featuring certain experts, he kept harping on the danger of ‘escalation’ from the other side. He was aided by some of these experts, one of whom suggested that the government had ignored strategic concerns in order to put on a big show with an eye on the upcoming elections – precisely what the likes of Imran Khan and Shah Mahmud Qureishi are claiming.

But it was only going to get worse. On Wednesday, when the Pakistanis tried to respond by sending their planes into Indian airspace, the chorus from Sardesai and co. got stronger. The capture of an Indian pilot and shooting down of a fighter jet led to even more fear-mongering by these people. They insisted that this ‘escalation’ is taking India down a dangerous path for which we are not ready.


What is shocking is the lack of strategic understanding lacked by these senior journalists whith decades of experience behind them. If India were to accept Imran Khan’s offer of a dialogue – which he made after the Pakistani authorities announced the capture of the IAF pilot, with an air of haughtiness – it would make India seem weak-kneed once again. The psychological gains of executing a successful strike in Pakistani territory would evaporate also.

The facts are crystal clear: Pakistani establishment and the Army were humiliated by the action of Indian Air Force. They needed a face-saver. War is not an option as the country is bankrupt and not capable of taking on the mighty Indian forces. So, they look for some sort of small gain that they can hold up as an assertion of their strength and their ability to match India.

Taking down an Indian jet and capturing an Indian fighter pilot is something they thought good enough to play with. Hence, after boasting about defending their airspace and shooting down an IAF fighter jet, they offered a resumption of dialogue – something that would suggest that their counter-aggression punctured Indian bravado and forced them to the dialogue table.


If India backs off, Pakistan would claim the same kind of ‘victory’ that they do for the 1965 war and their confidence would be higher than ever. India would end-up looking like a soft-state that can’t deal a decisive blow to Pakistani military might. This is precisely what the Pakistani state wants.

Yet, the Sardesais of this world would rather have the Indian government paranoid about ‘escalation’ and cease aggressive operations. They want the Indian people to cower due to the prospect of Pakistani retaliation. Despite unanimity of opinion among IAF veterans that India is fully capable of inflicting more damage on Pak and, despite the capture of an officer, give greater pain to the Islamic republic, this section of the media, and by extension, the intelligentsia, is hell bent on hurting Indian morale.

Their unstated assertion is: the costs of continuing hostilities with Pakistan is too high and the Indian nation can’t withstand it. They want us to believe that the Modi-led government is taking Indian down the road of destruction. So, step back and resume dialogue.

They wouldn’t mind the humiliation India would suffer due to this backtracking. They also don’t mind the message of weakness it would convey. These people would see India remain a soft nation getting bullied by a much smaller, weaker, poorer nation.

It’s time that other sections of the media, and people on social media, ensure that their attempt to generate fear among the Indian people fails and the nation remains undeterred. This opportunity shouldn’t be missed to prove India’s intolerance for terror – once and for all.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Latest News

Why China, why?- The various explanations on what prompted the Chinese incursions in Ladakh

The purpose behind the Chinese orchestration of the standoff in Ladakh was in all likelihood to coerce India into exercising restraint in relation to its development of infrastructure near the LAC and to safeguard the China Pakistan Economic Corridor from any prospective Indian threat.

Changing the way we travel post pandemic

As Marcel Proust said ‘The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes.’

Some men just want to watch the world burn: Instigators Motto

When some people just try to instigate people against each other, they reveal their true colours that they are not for anyone but are against everyone but themselves. Such people make me remember the quote Some men just want to watch the world burn.

The state of state

It is the call of all organ of government to trust each other and help them to deliver the justice to the needy. It will help them to gain the trust of people so that goals of constitution can be achieved.

सुनो तेजस्विनी, ब्रा स्ट्रैप में मत उलझो..

उदारवादी और वामपंथी महिला समूहों ने ऐसा वातावरण बनाने का प्रयास किया मानो, ब्रा स्ट्रैप छुपाने के लिए टोका जाना ही आज की लड़की के जीवन की सबसे बड़ी समस्या है।

Overpopulation in India- A ticking time bomb

Overpopulation is the key reason for worsening public finance and societal problems, a Population Control Bill will solve most of these issues and pave way for a better India for future generations.

Recently Popular

Power of dreams

Trust yourself and do your efforts. Without sustainable efforts, its hard to achieve success in whatever tasks we do.

Who killed Sushant?

Initially his suicide was linked with bullying and nepotism. Rhea has been already interrogated in this case. The Mumbai police has already registered a case under professional rivalry and is investigating.

The story of Lord Jagannath and Krishna’s heart

But do we really know the significance of this temple and the story behind the incomplete idols of Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra and Maa Shubhadra?

Striking similarities between the death of Parveen Babi and Sushant Singh Rajput: A mere co-incidence or well planned murders?

Together Rhea and Bhatt’s media statements subtly and cleverly project Sushant as some kind of a nut job like Parveen Babi, another Bhatt conjuring.

Me in conversation with Aakar Patel and his wife over Pakistan and patriotism

A response to Aakar Patel's fictitious conversation with his wife.