Indian historian has long been under scrutiny by rational and nationalist mind. Unlike other countries, India has history probably as old as its evolution. The literature of Hindu in itself is a history and that has been long refuted by some historians.
Biggest blunder to Indian history begun with elimination of Hindu Literature from historical value.
Next the Muslim invader and their Middle east mentor took control of educations and research all over the world through distribution of mindless petro dollar.
The new born communist historian lapped those free petro dollar and sold their honest intelligentsia. All this happened in most systematic manner.
Government controlled organization, Middle east funded them, Left historian occupied these institution, written false document, sold them through seminars and workshop, wrote college curriculum, created generation of loyalist, blackmailed and corrupted young student and finally created a false history.
In India it went on and on for nearly 7 decades. Some of the legend today like Irfan Habib, Ram Guha, Romila Thapar, Vipin Chandra are most controversial on account of a narrative which is largely challenged by archaeological results. The most controversial part of history revolves around Medieval where conscious effort of legitimization happened for foreign invaders.
One of the pertinent example is denial of archaeological proof in history book for Three important temple of Hindu. Lord Ram Janm bhoomi Temple at Ayodhya, Lord Krishan Temple at Dwarika and Lord Shiv Temple at Varanasi. No history book explains the archaeological facts on these three temple, still they occupy a claim to be called historian.
Time has come when these historians and their work should be reviewed by set of archaeologist and scholar to decide their continuity in college curriculum.