Wednesday, August 12, 2020
Home Opinions Rafale - Case of purloined pages

Rafale – Case of purloined pages

Also Read

T S Dhakshinamurthyhttp://teeyesdee.blogspot.com
Retired central banker.  As a youngster published poems in Youth Times, Mirror, Indian Express, Poetry Chronicle, Poesis etc. Translated modern Tamil poems into English for Sahithya Akademy's special edition on Tamil Poetry. Translated Ionesco's Rhinoceros from French to Tamil, published by CreA, Chennai. Served as a Volunteer with Sneha, Chennai Chapter of Samaritans International (non religious organisation for prevention of suicide and helping the lonely, depressed etc. Interests include religion, politics, economics, rock music, cricket etc.
 

The Hon’ble Supreme Court while agreeing to hear petitions seeking review of its verdict in Rafale case has held that leaked papers were admissible and rejected Centre’s objections. The Court further observed, inter alia, that there was no legal provision that could stop publication of a document marked secret.

While legal luminaries and erudite pundits will no doubt parse the verdict as to its intricacies and nuances, this is the loud thinking of a layman who has the utmost respect for Judiciary and has held for long the view that Judiciary has remained the last bastion of rectitude in the country.

It is the prerogative of the Government to classify a document as secret. It could be a personal file of a peon or a submarine manual or the nuclear code. Whether the subject matter merits to be treated as secret or not is the Executive’s call, not anybody else’s.

Once the document has been classified as secret, any unauthorized access to it is but thievery. It cannot be otherwise. In other words only if the access is duly authorized by the Government, can such access be termed legal. In the instant case, it is illegal because the secret documents were photocopied by clandestine access. Simply put, you have taken a Government document without its permission. The information obtained and passed on can thus only be termed as stolen.

Government has repeatedly clarified that the documents are outside the ambit of RTI Act, thus out of the public domain. What is not in the public domain is in the exclusive domain of the Government. Any intrusion into that privacy is transgression, untenable and unjustifiable.

Now the possessor of the stolen information is not entitled to it nor can he make free use thereof merely because of possession. ‘A’ steals s bike and sells it to ‘B’ and ‘B’ buys it i and pays the price. Mere payment of the price does not confer on ‘B’ the rightful ownership of the bike. A stolen bike remains stolen and the Police will be justified in repossessing it from ‘B’ The buyer is not exculpated because he was unaware of its being stolen.

 

Such being the case, on the same analogy, how can the Maha Vishnu of Mount Road (now dwindled into a disguised pamphleteer of moribund Marxism) use the material and claim immunity under Freedom of Press. The original material itself is stained and thus publication thereof is legally questionable. The Hindu may at beast take shelter under Freedom of Press for not disclosing the source but it cannot escape responsibility for publishing a document not secured legally.

The next question is admissibility of such stolen document as evidence in a Court of Law. Now, if a conversation is tapped and recorded and such tapping does not have the prior authorization from a judicial authority, such tapped and recorded conversation is inadmissible under the Law. A person could have said in a tapped conversation he had committed a murder but the tape cannot be used against him unless the tapping was in the first place duly judicially authorized. It is a well settled tenet.

If a residence is searched and incriminating documents are seized, no matter the gravity and explicitness of the contents of such documents, they are inadmissible in a Court of Law unless the search is carried out after obtaining the due authorization from a judicial authority. Leave alone the vaults of the Defence Ministry, if the documents are taken even from your home, the same rule holds.

 

The litmus test is thus legal access to the documents and acquisition thereof in a legitimate manner.

Such stolen documents concerning Rafale today may tomorrow be about a nuclear submarine or details of war preparedness. How can we ratify such larceny? Lest one forget, complete manual of operations of an Indian submarine was published in Australia raising a very serious security threat. Can we condone such thievery?

Consider another scenario. Suppose the draft verdict of a sensitive case in Supreme Court, pertaining to, say, a religious dispute or a corporate war, involving communal or financial repercussions, or the proceedings of a Collegium meeting are leaked and published, will the same equanimity be maintained, can we maintain that no law or regulation forbid such thievery? Will it be kosher for a newspaper to publish it? If hacking of a personal computer or laptop is illegal, it follows accessing unauthorisedly a Government file stealthily and copying papers marked secret is equally illegal.

The PM was hounded till the very last day of 2014 election. SIT after SIT was set up but he was exonerated. Not content, at the last minute they slapped a snoop gate on him, though the lady involved and her mother said no such thing took place and they had no complaint. In a déjà vu scenario, it’s clear they are straining every sinew to besmirch his name in any manner whatever.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

T S Dhakshinamurthyhttp://teeyesdee.blogspot.com
Retired central banker.  As a youngster published poems in Youth Times, Mirror, Indian Express, Poetry Chronicle, Poesis etc. Translated modern Tamil poems into English for Sahithya Akademy's special edition on Tamil Poetry. Translated Ionesco's Rhinoceros from French to Tamil, published by CreA, Chennai. Served as a Volunteer with Sneha, Chennai Chapter of Samaritans International (non religious organisation for prevention of suicide and helping the lonely, depressed etc. Interests include religion, politics, economics, rock music, cricket etc.

Latest News

The curious case of Shah Faesal

Shah Faesal, is a UPSC civil services topper and a staunch campaigner of Pakistan sponsored "Kashmiriyat" and vocal anti-Indian.

Covid opens up urban development challenge, how we respond to it, is up to us

This is the time when we should start focusing on creating employment opportunities in tier 3 and tier 4 cities and even in rural areas, so people can find the employment near their homes and don’t need to migrate to metros in search of employment.

Job data; faster PM Narendra Modi acts on it, the better: It should also capture migrants’ data

Transparency and availability of data was a big hallmark of Narendra Modi 1.0 government, with various information available on dashboard and a click of a button, similarly this would be a game changing achievement for Narendra Modi 2.0.

Law against fake news is need of the hour: Media can’t hide anymore behind the freedom of speech

Article 19.1.a b which deals with freedom of speech and expression is universally applicable to all the citizens, including journalists. There is no special provision under the constitution for freedom of speech to the media.

Why Ram Mandir

generation or two, Bharatiyas have resisted, sacrificed and survived one invasion after another. The reclaiming of this ancient site and building a grand temple is a civilization accepting the challenge of the competing invasive cultures and declaring in one voice that we are here to stay.

Awakening of the sleeping Hindu giant

An Ode to the Resurrection of the Hindu self-esteem & pride.

Recently Popular

सामाजिक भेदभाव: कारण और निवारण

भारत में व्याप्त सामाजिक असामानता केवल एक वर्ग विशेष के साथ जिसे कि दलित कहा जाता है के साथ ही व्यापक रूप से प्रभावी है परंतु आर्थिक असमानता को केवल दलितों में ही व्याप्त नहीं माना जा सकता।

The story of Lord Jagannath and Krishna’s heart

But do we really know the significance of this temple and the story behind the incomplete idols of Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra and Maa Shubhadra?

Avrodh: the web-series that looks more realistic and closer to the truth!

The web-series isn't about the one Major who lead the attack, its actually about the strike and the events that lead to it, Major was a part of a big picture like others who fought alongside him, the snipers, the national security advisor so on and so forth.

Two nation theory after independence

Two Nation Theory was the basis of partition of India. Partition was accepted based on the assumption that the Muslims staying back in India because they rejected the Two Nation theory. However, later decades proved that Two Nation Theory is not only subscribed by a large section of Indian Muslims but also being nourished by the appeasement politics.

Striking similarities between the death of Parveen Babi and Sushant Singh Rajput: A mere co-incidence or well planned murders?

Together Rhea and Bhatt’s media statements subtly and cleverly project Sushant as some kind of a nut job like Parveen Babi, another Bhatt conjuring.
Advertisements