Thursday, June 4, 2020
Home Opinions Deciphering Narendra Modi government's Pakistan Policy

Deciphering Narendra Modi government’s Pakistan Policy

Also Read

 

In an interview on Aap Ki Adalat in 2009, the then Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi had said “Pakistan ko usi ki bhasha mei jawaab dena chahiye aur yeh ‘love letter’ likhna band karna chahiye” (Pakistan has to be answered in a language it understands. No point writing these ‘love letters’).

5 years after saying this ‘what Indians want to hear line’, he became the Prime Minister. Since then, he has been alleged to have taken a u-turn on what he said in 2009. Has he indeed, or has he not? How easy it is to answer this question? Lets look at few things:

First and foremost , it is ‘comparatively’ easier to judge foreign policy with respect to any country where there is only one central authority in the concerned country – its central government. Because in countries with a single central authority, the talks are only with that authority. While the content of the talks may not be immediately made public, the results [joint statements, treaties and pacts, etc.] are usually there for the public to see.

For instance, the results of talks with countries like Japan or U.S. can be known from the stands they take with respect to India or the deals that they sign with India. Because there, the central governments usually have the authority to take those stands and sign those treaties, with the legislative arms of those governments [Parliaments or similar bodies] ratifying the treaties.

But the same is not the case with Pakistan. Here, the civilian government lacks the authority to take decisions. The real authority lies with the army. Hence if you want to get things done, army is the authority to talk to. Usually these talks, if they happen, will be unofficial and secret in nature, and hence the public will never know about them, unless someone involved with the talks writes a book on them maybe a generation or generations later.

Second, we need to take notice of one unusual phenomenon. That phenomenon is – no ceasefire violation has taken place since November 2, 2015. From that date , till July 7, 2016 [the date of writing this post], it is 8 months and 5 days.

 

How is this possible, if one sees how bloody the 2013-2015 period was? Is it just a coincidence  or is it an achievement of some secret talks with Pakistan army? It is difficult to find answers to this questions, hence it is equally difficult to judge Pakistan policy of Modi government.

Another question ,though may sound silly to mind is – could Pakistan PM Nawaz Sharif be exercising some authority on, or rather some deal with army? Because army chief Gen. Raheel Sharif needs his consent for extension of tenure? If true, then does Nawaz Sharif have some role in the absence of ceasefire violations over the past 8 months?

Once again, these questions will be difficult to answer for now.

 

Third, there has been a regime change in the civilian government – in 2009, when Modi gave the answer mentioned at the beginning of the blog, Asif Ali Zardari was the Pakistan President and Yousaf Raza Gilani was the Prime Minister. Now these chairs are occupied by Mamnoon Hussain and Nawaz Sharif respectively.

One cannot deny the fact that Nawaz Sharif hates the Pakistan Army. After all, it was Pakistan army led by Gen. Pervez Musharraf who outsted Nawaz Sharif from power in 1999. Thus Nawaz Sharif has his interests in weakening the grip of Pakistan army.

Could this be the reason behind Modi’s outreach and building of personal rapport with Nawaz Sharif ? Could Modi be trying to strengthen Nawaz Sharif by supporting him?

Again difficult answers to find out.

Even though these questions maybe funny, but the ceasefire maintenance for 8 months is impossible to overlook.

Fourth, it is true that stoppage of ceasefire violation doesn’t mean stoppage of cross border terrorism. But earlier , ceasefire was violated to give cover to the infiltrating militants. Now, at least one menace of the two has stopped/has been stopped – at least for now.

A question which the reader may ask is, would I have raised the same questions if it was Manmohan Singh instead of Narendra Modi?

Well, since most of terrorism in India has its source in Pakistan, Indian govt’s policies on Pakistan and terrorism can seldom be separated. The Narendra Modi government has been giving free hand to our various security agencies to destroy the networks of terrorist groups in India. Also it has not done anything that would harm the cause of security agencies of India. The opposite seems to be true in case of Manmohan Singh government.

This I am saying over years of reading on how and why terrorist attacks succeed in India. I have read a very nicely written book on the 26/11 terrorist strikes. With my readings , I can conclude that Manmohan Singh did not do everything it required to deal with terrorism.

Consider this : 1 of the first things which Manmohan government did in 2004 was to remove the Prevention Of Terrorism Act [POTA], under the pretext of it being “anti-minority”, which it was not. Also, in 2010, Manmohan government released 25 Pakistani terrorists for FREE as a goodwill gesture. These terrorists included the mastermind of the recent Pathankot attack. The Ishrat Jahan affidavit fiasco is also well known now.

Also, it is a fact that the Indian army and BSF had orders of ‘restricted’ retaliation in case of ceasefire violations by Pakistan under Manmohan government, which have now been changed to ‘massive’ retaliation under Modi government. The jawans are now free to retaliate as and when they consider necessary.

Thus, when Manmohan government was deliberately taking all the wrong domestic steps to deal with terrorism, it is unlikely that it will try to do something  in Pakistan which is beneficial to us. Hence, the questions I asked above do not even arise in case of Manmohan Singh government talking to Pakistan.

Now coming back to the topic, like I said earlier, a lot of questions remain unanswered, and will remain unanswered over a long period of time. What will be the result of all this activity, one does not know. But the ceasefire along the border and LOC points out that there is much more going on than what appears to the naked eye.

This only means that PM Narendra Modi’s Pakistan Policy is difficult to judge as lots of things are unclear. It will take time for things to get clear, providing us the opportunity to judge the policy.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Latest News

एक मुख्यमंत्री जो भली भांति जानता है कि संकट को अवसर में किस प्रकार परिवर्तित करना है: भारत के सर्वाधिक लोकप्रिय मुख्यमंत्री के प्रयासों...

भारत के इन सेक्युलर, लिबरल और वामपंथियों को यह रास नहीं आया कि भगवा धारण करने वाला एक हिन्दू सन्यासी कैसे भारत के सबसे बड़े राज्य का प्रशासक हो सकता है। लेकिन यह हुआ।

2020 अमेरिका का सब से खराब साल बनने जा रहा है? पहले COVID-19 और फिर दंगे

America फिर से जल रहा है: आंशिक रूप से, जैसा कि हिंसा भड़कती है, पुलिस और उनके वाहनों पर हमला किया जाता...

Corona and a new breed of social media intellectuals

Opposing an individual turned into opposing betterment of your own country and countrymen.

Why peaceful borders with India pose a threat to Pakistan’s sovereignty

Although a religion may have some influence on the culture of the society as a whole but it can never disassociate an individual from the much broader way of life which defines culture. Indonesia is a great example of the above stated distinction.

आपको पता भी नहीं है और आपके मंदिरों को लूटने के षड़यंत्र रचे जा रहे हैं

मंदिर हमारी धार्मिक और आध्यात्मिक आस्था के केंद्र रहे हैं। सनातन धर्म की स्थापना में मंदिरों का योगदान सहस्त्राब्दियों से सर्वोच्च रहा है। ऐसे में हम कुछ दो चार पाखंडी वामपंथियों और विधर्मियों के हाथों अपने धार्मिक केंद्रों का नाश नहीं होने देंगे। हमें विरोध करना होगा।

Kaun jaat ho and Christian missionaries

Ugly face of Christianity, the most hypocratic religion of the world!

Recently Popular

रचनाधर्मियों को गर्भस्थ बेटी का उत्तर

जो तुम्हें अग्नि परीक्षा देती असहाय सीता दिखती है, वो मुझे प्रबल आत्मविश्वास की धनी वो योद्धा दिखाई देती है जिसने रावण के आत्मविश्वास को छलनी कर इस धरा को रावण से मुक्त कराया.

The one difference between the Congress of today and that of before 2014

For the sake of the future generations, for the sake of our children, please read more books about how Congress had been ruling the country and be aware of the dangers.

Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul was right to call out rising intolerance

The libertarians need to know free speech is not licence for hate speech. Our fundamental rights are not akin to First Amendment Rights, as in the US. There are reasonable restrictions and they have a purpose.

श्रमिकों का पलायन: अवधारणा

अंत में जब कोविड 19 के दौर में श्रमिक संकट ने कुछ दबी वास्तविकताओं से दो चार किया है. तो क्यों ना इस संकट को अवसर में बदल दिया जाए.

Entry of ‘Scientific corruption’ in Tamil Nadu politics and how to save the state

MGR and then Amma placed the politics of dynasty and family rule in Tamil Nadu to the corner but the demise of Amma has shattered the state and is pegging for a great leader to lead.