Friday, February 26, 2021
Home Opinions Part-6: Are the protests non-political?

Part-6: Are the protests non-political?

Also Read

vinod2ahttp://vinodaravindakshan.com
Vinod is a HR leader for a leading tech company in the Silicon Valley. He writes on topics including the economy, science and education. He is an alumnus of IIT Bombay, Cornell University and the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Just look at who is driving the protests in the enclosed list. We see the following – a bunch of purely political parties and the Bharatiya Kisan Union (highlighted in yellow). The President of the Bharatiya Kisan Union is Mahendra Tikait, the son of the same leader Mahendra Tikait who brought the Rajiv Gandhi government to its heels in 1988. Mahendra Tikait belongs to the Rashtriya Lok Dal, a Jat and farmer party, which has an alliance with the Samajwadi party in Uttar Pradesh and fought against the BJP. In the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, it was galling for him to lose his election deposits by getting just 9539 votes against the more than 5.2 lakh votes for the BJP. A person who got 9539 votes claims to represent all farmers in India and the media too gives him a free pass. It is fine for protests to be political as it is the job of the opposition to oppose, but protestors to claim no political bias is blatant hypocrisy.

Hypocrisy is abundant in Indian politics and academia. While the ruling party has accused the Congress, SAD and AAP of both promising and supporting changes in APMC earlier and now walking back on their word, these parties in turn accuse the BJP of the same hypocrisy of opposing farm law reform during Congress rule. Almost every party had agreed to agricultural reform in the past, and it is blatant politics to oppose it now.

Academia is no exception to the hypocrisy all around. Kaushik Basu and Raghuram Rajan, both chief economic advisors who had preached about APMC reform and private sector involvement now claim that private sector would exploit farmers and that the laws should be repealed. Rajan once said “The private sector should be allowed to operate in developing these market linkages.” A pity that economists are worse than politicians and don’t have any moral courage to say the truth.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

vinod2ahttp://vinodaravindakshan.com
Vinod is a HR leader for a leading tech company in the Silicon Valley. He writes on topics including the economy, science and education. He is an alumnus of IIT Bombay, Cornell University and the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Latest News

Recently Popular

गुप्त काल को स्वर्ण युग क्यों कहा जाता है

एक सफल शासन की नींव समुद्रगप्त ने अपने शासनकाल में ही रख दी थी इसीलिए गुप्त सम्राटों का शासन अत्यधिक सफल रहा। साम्राज्य की दृढ़ता शांति और नागरिकों की उन्नति इसके प्रमाण थे।

सामाजिक भेदभाव: कारण और निवारण

भारत में व्याप्त सामाजिक असामानता केवल एक वर्ग विशेष के साथ जिसे कि दलित कहा जाता है के साथ ही व्यापक रूप से प्रभावी है परंतु आर्थिक असमानता को केवल दलितों में ही व्याप्त नहीं माना जा सकता।

The story of Lord Jagannath and Krishna’s heart

But do we really know the significance of this temple and the story behind the incomplete idols of Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra and Maa Shubhadra?

National Education Policy 2020: A policy for new India

The policy places a welcome emphasis on a holistic, learner centered, flexible system that seek to transform India into a vibrant knowledge society, rightfully balancing the rootedness and pride in India as well as acceptance of the best ideas and practices in the world of learning from across the globe.

Pt Deen Dayal Upadhyaya and Integral Humanism

According to Upadhyaya, the primary concern in India must be to develop an indigenous economic model that puts the human being at centre stage.