Saturday, June 6, 2020
Home Media Selectivity, national interest and media

Selectivity, national interest and media

Also Read

 

Selectivity is an inevitable human trait. It may be beneficial for personal interests but overall it is disastrous for the national interest. Selectivity is often used as a tool to prove some point, to endorse a viewpoint or to disprove or malign some other viewpoint. There are two ways in which selectivity is practised – first is selectivity in thoughts and second is selectivity in actions. When it comes to the national interest both can be dangerous. Selectivity in thoughts can be due to certain prejudices or ideological preferences or simply due to avoiding the truth.

The first two are certainly a human trait and there is nothing unusual in them until they remain behind a boundary of rationality but the last one is dangerous not only for the national interest but also for the individual. Selectivity in action is practising the first two irrationally or practising the last one in fullest measure. Examples include racism and the inability to act against it. When it comes to the national interest one must analyze the selectivity practised by media and its consequences.

Scientist and author Anand Ranganathan once tweeted, “You remove one set of names, you report one set of stories, you conceal one set of tragedies – and that’s how you turn a riot into a pogrom and journalism into propaganda.” When media practices selectivity journalism undoubtedly turns into propaganda. This selectivity includes not reporting, under-reporting, or over-reporting a certain set of stories, hiding facts, spreading misinformation, and fake news and intentional misreporting. What about the expression of your own opinions? Well, that should not be counted as selectivity unless you practice any of the above ways of selectivity. Op-eds must not be mixed with reportage as it creates clutter. A classical example of the selectivity of media is the reportage of Delhi Riots by western media. The reports mixed with op-eds that were published in western media showed only one side of the story and thus riots were projected as anti-Muslim pogrom which is far from reality.

There have been many occasions when media houses have practised selectivity for their gains. This harms the national interest in many ways. Firstly truth becomes suppressed. In many cases, the truth becomes politicized, and when this happens people get divided into two segments and start fighting each other. A lot of clutter is generated in the process and the motivation to act together for the right cause. The only yield of the whole process is personal gains. National interest is cornered. 

How one must fight selectivity? There are again many options available. The most common of them are either to emphasize on the other half of the story not shown or to show the complete story with equal weightage. Latter must be preferred because practising the former would make you a contemporary of the one against whom you are fighting. The latter is also better as one could get a reliable source of information. It is better for the national interest. But we could simply ban the media turned propaganda factory, then why work so hard? This is because it would be both principally and constitutionally incorrect. Clutter must be cut through truth and facts only in a democracy unless a constitutional limit is crossed.

In that case, the law must act. The last question is that can we practice selectivity in the national interest? The answer is that truth can be delayed but cannot be avoided.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Latest News

हिन्द उवाच

है लहू मिला जिस मिट्टी में, बिस्मिल, अशफ़ाक़, भगतसिंह का। जिसको स्वेदों से सींचा है, गाँधी और लाल बहादुर ने।

From a porcupine to a tiger – Advent of Modi sarkar

The Modi government has established a brand India, enveloping components of economy, diplomacy, revival of foreign affairs and a clean-up of corrupt-ridden governance of the past; dispensed from an establishment with little obligation to coalition partners that enjoys mandate and confidence of the citizenry of India

Has social service become a way of conversion?

Christian Missionaries blackmail vulnerable people to choose between being able to follow their traditions and being able to feed their family. In desperate times, many people convert.

Tiananmen massacre to communist attacks on Indian people: A saga of hate, hypocrisy and violence

Tiananmen remains one of the most sensitive and taboo subjects in China today, banned from both academic and popular realms.

George Floyd and India

Ashok Swain, who is a professor in Sweden’s Uppsala’s University was upset that such protest doesn’t happen in India, so did another ‘journalist’ Rana Ayyub. Instead of showing solidarity with a man who lost his life, these opportunists are provoking vandalism and mayhem in India too.

बौद्ध मत की वो बातें, जो बताई नहीं जाती

कोई कॉमरेड और नवबौद्ध आपको देवराज इंद्र से जुड़ी हुई ये बातें नहीं बताएगा. वास्तविकता तो यह है कि बौद्ध ग्रंथों में देवराज इंद्र का उतना ही वर्णन है, जितना हिन्दू ग्रंथों में मिलता है.

Recently Popular

रचनाधर्मियों को गर्भस्थ बेटी का उत्तर

जो तुम्हें अग्नि परीक्षा देती असहाय सीता दिखती है, वो मुझे प्रबल आत्मविश्वास की धनी वो योद्धा दिखाई देती है जिसने रावण के आत्मविश्वास को छलनी कर इस धरा को रावण से मुक्त कराया.

Easing lockdown a gamble?

If we want to compare economic condition and job loss due to lockdown and blame the govt., we ought to compare the mortality rate too, which one of the lowest in the world at around 2.83%!

The journey of anti-CAA virus in the U.S.: A tale of three cities

Kshama Sawant, a Hindu immigrant embraces Hindu phobic ideology and lead an anti-India campaign to seek a stage for her future political dreams.

भारत-चीन पर राहुल का सवाल

भारत ही नेहरू के नेतृत्व में पहला गैर साम्यवादी जनतांत्रिक राज्य था जिसने जनवादी कम्युनिस्ट चीन को मान्यता प्रदान की. नेहरू उस दौर में चीन को लेकर इतने रोमांटिक (कल्पनावादी) हो गए थे कि तिब्बत पर चीन का आधिपत्य स्वीकार कर लिया. पर जब 1962 में चीन ने भारत पर हमला किया तो नेहरू की विदेश नीति चौपट हो गई थी.

Corona and a new breed of social media intellectuals

Opposing an individual turned into opposing betterment of your own country and countrymen.