Saturday, December 5, 2020
Home Opinions "Technocrats are the key to take India forward", opines none less than Major Gaurav...

“Technocrats are the key to take India forward”, opines none less than Major Gaurav Arya

Also Read

Samved Iyer
I am but a college student with profound interest in current affairs.

At the end of a meeting to review the progress of a government scheme, Hon’ble Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently gave bureaucrats an earful, saying that they had spoiled his first five-year term in office, but he would not let them spoil the second.

Through an interview with the YouTube channel Defensive Offence, renowned defence analyst Major Gaurav Arya, sought to recommend solutions to the Prime Minister as regards the field of defence, in light of Prime Minister Modi’s scathing observation.

Major Arya opines that such bureaucratic institutions are structured precisely in the manner wherein they become impediments, and not assets, at least in the field of defence. He warns that the Prime Minister’s term could be ruined for the present tenure of five years until 2024, and every subsequent government would have to grapple with the same lethargy of the bureaucratic system.

He hastens to add that not all bureaucrats were lethargic, and he quoted the example of Shri T N Seshan, who implemented unprecedented transformations in the Election Commission of India and made it a powerful institution.

He is unequivocal about his disappointment on learning that the newly created position of “Chief of Defence Staff” or CDS was to be “first among equals”. He makes it clear that democracy must be kept away from the Armed Forces, for they simply cannot function in such an environment. They function on the basis of orders from the superiors.

He recommends that the CDS must be a five star general, superior to the three chiefs of the armed services. The CDS must have authority equivalent to that of a Cabinet Minister, and must report directly to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO). The three service chiefs must report to him. Integration of the three services could not be achieved by Integrated Theatre Commands alone. It would also require integration at the very top levels, that can be achieved by the CDS.

The Ministry of Defence, in his view, must be restricted purely to administrative work. The CDS and the service chiefs must be given a separate office in Delhi itself (he tentatively calls it the “Trident”, conceptualized as the equivalent of The Pentagon of the United States), and they must be given all authority for operational planning and expenditures of the allotted budget.

Major Arya has insisted that institutions such as DRDO and Ordnance Factory Boards must not be run by bureaucrats, but by technocrats. The former group is too preoccupied with files and file notings. The latter are capable of actually implementing their duties.

To support his assertion, he quotes two examples:

  • E Sreedharan, a retired officer of Indian Railway Service of Engineers, is popularly known as “Metro Man” because he was the brains behind the Delhi Metro, and he oversaw its successful implementation. This was because he was a technocrat who valued work. He had made his position unambiguous: if the political leadership were to interfere in his work, he would promptly tender his resignation and leave for Kerala, where he came from. Interestingly, he is the same person who opposed Arvind Kejriwal’s decision of announcing the metro as a freebie for women.
  • K Sivan, the Chairperson of ISRO, is also a technocrat, for he is well-acquainted with the technical skills for the work that his organization is responsible for; sending satellites to space, and not preparing elaborate file notings.

Administrative work is important, but bureaucrats who specialize in such work must not be made in charge of such important aspects of India’s security. According to Major Arya, the Ministry of Defence may be headed by a Minister of any background, but the Secretary of Defence must preferably be of a defence background. So should a sizeable number of other secretaries. Today, the Ministry of Defence has been dominated by civilians, who have little to no knowledge of military matters.

In today’s circumstances, the Headquarters of the Army, the Navy and the Air Force need to spend considerable time with the civilian bureaucracy of the Ministry of Defence, which gives rise to a parallel bureaucracy in these military institutions. This hampers the working of the armed services at top levels.

Major Arya has admitted that he has always been a critic of the Ordnance Factory Boards, but only because of the way it is structured. The engineers and scientists are extremely talented, but it is red-tapism that prevents them from showcasing their nigh-world-class skills. This is because the Boards are not run by technocrats.

He makes the same argument for DRDO. In this era, where new challenges such as information warfare, cyber warfare etc. face India, the role of technocrats increases even further.

He is categorical about the need for gunboat diplomacy. “There is no friendship without might”, he asserts. When the nation’s Prime Minister visits the head of another nation, the latter must always be aware that the INS Arihant is lurking in the oceans nearby.

None of the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council are “good boys”. They have among the most overawing records of human rights violations.

The United States of America: Hardly has there been a year since the conclusion of World War II when the United States was not involved in an armed conflict or a war. Its military operations increased exponentially following 9/11, and its interventions have often proved cataclysmic, as in the case of Iraq.

The Russian Federation: Joseph Stalin was responsible for the massacre of so many millions of his own citizens that in absolute numbers, his atrocities exceeded those of Hitler.

Peoples’ Republic of China: Mao Tse Tung exceeded the numbers of even Stalin when his aggressive industrialization policies led to deaths of millions of Chinese.

France: In its colonial history, France was responsible for ravaging North Africa.

The United Kingdom: Its tyrannic empire was responsible for the penurious conditions of several of its colonies, notably India.

India needn’t follow them, for our ethics are completely different. However, India can definitely learn from them. Periodic displays of power are necessary in order to thrive in this world. We must learn to toughen ourselves up.

Major Arya supports talks with Pakistan, but only when, in his words, “Imran Khan is on a wheelchair and General Bajwa has a bandaged head”. India needn’t launch itself into a war, but periodic strikes against Pakistan are necessary.

He does not quite approve of the government taking pride in its Army being non-expeditionary. According to him, the Army must be expeditionary. If we aim to be at the high table of nations, military power must be developed as a critical component of our gross national power. If we aim to counter China’s influence, and we should, for it would otherwise go against our interests, the Army must be made expeditionary.He asserts that the BSF must have the responsibility to guard the borders. The paramilitary and state police must be used to quell insurgency. The Army needs to be spared from such duties and must be made, just like the Navy and the Air Force, an armed service that is outward-looking, in the sense of being an instrument of power projection.

This is all the more necessary given the fact that in about two decades, the majority population of Balochistan would be Chinese. In his view, dealing with China on two fronts would be very difficult.

Not trusting the military to do its job is unfair. The Indian Army has had a stellar record of respecting the democratic ideals of India unlike Pakistan, where military coups are pretty common. The military must not be burdened with bureaucracy. He summarizes it by saying that the nation needs to put faith in its military for the purposes of external security, and being overly suspicious about it is akin to harbouring suspicion for the closest of one’s family members.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Samved Iyer
I am but a college student with profound interest in current affairs.

Latest News

NEP 2020: Revamping higher education and challenges ahead

Hope the government will implement NEP successfully in the higher education system and achieve all its goals in the predicted time. Thus, India will restore its role as a Vishwaguru.

Domestic violence: A grave concern

Domestic violence occurs when one person tries to dominate and control another person in a family-like or domestic relationship. Domestic violence involves...

Justin Trudeau’s unwarranted support to Farmers protests, was made on behest of Khalistani secessionists?

One has to wonder why Canadian PM has to make these unwarranted statements and the underlying aspect is, his coalition government is hanging with the support of the New Democratic Party which is a socialist far left political party and its leader is none other than Khalistani supporter Jagmeet Singh Dhaliwal.

BJP and the need for the saffron party to win GHMC

many, are making fun of this, that just to fight Owaisi brothers and the KCR, BJP had to put their full force in this election, but how many of us have realized the depth of this move by BJP?

Overview of voting trends of Muslims in Bihar election 2020

by observing the overall data, one can conclude that non-Muslim votes are divided into Muslim and non-Muslim candidates while Muslim votes are only divided among Muslim candidates.

Are the phrases “Brahmin left and Brahmin bailout”, a rhetoric of anti-semitism on Brahmin community?

The term Brahmin Left is a new phrase being used by Progressive left to showcase Brahmin community of India. It is not new that Brahmins community is often dragged in western media to malign them in a derogatory way.

Recently Popular

गुप्त काल को स्वर्ण युग क्यों कहा जाता है

एक सफल शासन की नींव समुद्रगप्त ने अपने शासनकाल में ही रख दी थी इसीलिए गुप्त सम्राटों का शासन अत्यधिक सफल रहा। साम्राज्य की दृढ़ता शांति और नागरिकों की उन्नति इसके प्रमाण थे।

सामाजिक भेदभाव: कारण और निवारण

भारत में व्याप्त सामाजिक असामानता केवल एक वर्ग विशेष के साथ जिसे कि दलित कहा जाता है के साथ ही व्यापक रूप से प्रभावी है परंतु आर्थिक असमानता को केवल दलितों में ही व्याप्त नहीं माना जा सकता।

Did this abusive journalist do a ‘fake interview’ while with Hindustan Times?

According to allegations, Swati Chaturvedi published a fake interview with George Fernandes.

The reality of Akbar that our history textbooks don’t teach!

Akbar had over 5,000 wives in his harems, and was regularly asked by his Sunni court officials to limit the number of his wives to 4, due to it being prescribed by the Quran. Miffed with the regular criticism of him violating the Quran, he founded the religion Din-e-illahi

The story of Lord Jagannath and Krishna’s heart

But do we really know the significance of this temple and the story behind the incomplete idols of Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra and Maa Shubhadra?