Saturday, May 30, 2020
Home Opinions Article 370 and attempts to subvert Indian Democracy!

Article 370 and attempts to subvert Indian Democracy!

Also Read

We have seen an outpour of emotions and arguments from all quarters since article 370 of the Indian constitution was amended on 5 Aug 2019. An overwhelming number of Indian citizens welcomed this as a historic decision aimed towards ending the status quo in Jammu & Kashmir. Since independence, J&K has been the most volatile region in the Indian subcontinent with India and Pakistan both staking their claims and both the countries controlling some part of the region.

Pakistan is leaving no stone unturned to paint the recent developments in J&K as genocidal and subverting people’s democratic rights. It is on an all-out media offensive with its entire propaganda machinery working to malign India and its democratic credentials.

A few people mainly related to Indian media industry have also raised their concerns over India’ move towards article 370 as an unconstitutional and undemocratic act by the BJP government. Let’s try to examine the merits of this argument and if the Government of India is really being undemocratic.

 

Among all the systems used for governing a state, democracy is widely considered the aptest. Though none of the governance models known today can be termed as flawless looking at how they have served people around the globe, still democracy is among the lesser evils or the most preferred.

India decided to opt for a representative form of democracy after it drafted the biggest written constitution known to the humankind. Citizens of India elect their leaders at various levels and the elected in turn form the governments with the duty to govern and make laws at various levels as representatives of the people. This system has a lot of checks and balances to prevent misuse of power. Also, the Indian constitution is arguably the most liberal document of its kind.

Article 370 has been a point of contention since its inception with Dr B R Amedkar, the chairman of the constitution drafting committee refusing to endorse it. Dr Ambedkar famously replied to Sheikh Abdulla, a Kashmiri leader: “You wish India should protect your borders, she should build roads in your area, she should supply you food grains, and Kashmir should get equal status as India. But the Government of India should have only limited powers and Indian people should have no rights in Kashmir. To give consent to this proposal, would be a treacherous thing against the interests of India and I, as the Law Minister of India, will never do it.” It is another story that article 370 was still adopted due to insistence from PM Nehru at the behest of Sheikh Abdullah without following the due constitutional process. Article 370 was termed as “temporary and transient” before being adopted which makes it anything but writing etched in stone, it means this article sooner or later had to go.

 

Article 370 basically accepted Jammu & Kashmir as akin to an alien entity within Republic of India, where Indian parliament had no jurisdiction to make laws and the state enjoyed a distinction of a virtually independent state within India. The rights given to minorities and women given by the constitution didn’t apply in J&K and no person outside was allowed to call J&K their home citing arbitrary citizenship rules. Thousands of scheduled caste Valmiki workers were constitutionally confined to only performing sweeping jobs because if they wish to do anything else, they would not remain residents of J&K.

According to many legal eagles, abrogation of Article 370 required only a presidential order. However, the present government has not only secured a presidential order but a cabinet approval, 2/3 votes in Rajya Sabha and more than 3/4 votes in Lok Sabha. To the people casting aspersions on the process, if this is not a constitutional process of making/amending laws than what is?

There is no other way prescribed in the constitution or any associated law for amendment in the constitution. So the question is why is it being termed as unconstitutional and undemocratic. It would not be unfair to say that people who call it such, either have little understanding of the law or are bigoted. Such individuals also seem to have no affection towards maintaining the territorial integrity of the Republic of India. J&K has unparalleled historic, military and strategic importance for India and we have rightly decided to fully integrate it and people who are trying to oppose this move seem to be the real perpetrators against democracy and the constitutional values. 

 

Also, the people suggesting that this is BJP government’s sudden and arbitrary move can’t be any farther from the truth. This is anything but sudden, this is an unrelenting agenda of BJP even before it was founded in 1980. Abrogation of Article 370 is a core agenda since the foundation of Jan Sangh, the parent organization to BJP. If an agenda which is forewarned since decades can be called sudden than I can call myself a stillborn. The thing that opposition can’t stomach is them being outsmarted and an assumption that this will remain a perpetual poll promise and never a reality. Also, BJP secured a huge victory in 2019 with the abrogation of 370 as its main poll promise so people’s blessings are already with this decision. If this is not democratic and constitutional then it’s a wonder what is!

- advertisement -

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Latest News

भगवान श्रीराम का वनवास जो 500 वर्षों के बाद समाप्त हुआ: श्रीराम मंदिर निर्माण की अनंत कथा

अंततः श्रीराम विजयी हुए, भारतवर्ष विजयी हुआ, हिन्दू विजयी हुए और इस संघर्ष में दिए गए सहस्त्रों बलिदान सार्थक हुए।

Hindu Mahasabha and the partition of West Bengal

Without Hindu Mahasabha and their fight for a Hindu Rashtra, West Bengal would have been a part of East Pakistan after the partition. The Bengali Hindu Homeland Movement and the resistance by Mookherjee and company is the reason why Kolkata and West Bengal became a part of the Indian Union.

नेपाल के रक्षा मंत्री का खेदजनक बयान

पिछले कुछ सालो में नेपाल में ये बात उठनी शुरू हुई है की ये जो पूरा समझौता है इसकी समीक्षा की जा रही है। कुछ महीने पहले २०२० में नेपाल की सरकार ने ब्रिटेन सरकार को एक खत लिखा, उस खत में उन्होंने यह कहा के हम १९४७ की संधि को रिव्यु करना चाहते है जिसमें गोरखा सोल्जर्स के बारे में फैसले लिए गए थे।

Do judgements contribute to pendency pandemic?

Just as the Covid-19 virus is not going anywhere until a Vaccine is discovered, this pendency Pandemic too is not going anywhere until a vaccine is found by superior Judiciary, to administer to itself, quite heavy doses of the same.

राम मंदिर बनाएंगे और डेट भी बताएंगे

जो कल तक कहा करते थे,राम मंदिर बनाएंगे लेकिन डेट नहीं बताएंगे उनके लिए आज काफी बुरी खबर है क्योंकि राम भक्तों के द्वारा भव्य राम मंदिर का निर्माण शुरू कर दिया गया है।

क्या मजदूरों के दयनीय स्थिति के लिए सरकारें जिम्मेवार हैं?

अब मजदूरों के लिए हर सांसदों, विधायकों और जनप्रतिनिधियों से आशा की जानी चाहिए कि वे अपने विधान सभा क्षेत्र के लिए गाड़ियों का बंदोबस्त कर दे।

Recently Popular

In conversation with Nehru: On Savarkar’s mercy petitions

This conversation is only an attempt to present the comparative study of jail terms served by both Savarkar and Jawaharlal Nehru.

Chandrababu Naidu at year 1 of Modi 2.0

The TDP leader who was discussing post poll strategies with the high command of INC few days before the 2019 results, was missing from a conference organized by Sonia Gandhi, recently.

Contrasts between Savarkar and Nehru, how merciful the British were to Nehru & harsh to Savarkar

Congress should be pin-pointedly asked if it considers Shivaji a ‘traitor’ for writing such a letter to Aurangzeb in 1666.

Open Letter to Indian parents from a veteran soldier – your children are being brainwashed

Islamisation of our kids, Lessons in History, Mahmud Ghazni Vs Prithviraj Chauhan. Stop it.

तीन ऐसे लोग जिन्होंने बताया कि पराजय अंत नहीं अपितु आरम्भ है: पढ़िए इन तीन राजनैतिक योद्धाओं की कहानी

ये तीन लोग हैं केंद्रीय मंत्री श्रीमती स्मृति ईरानी, दिल्ली भाजपा के युवा एवं ऊर्जावान नेता एवं समाजसेवी कपिल मिश्रा एवं तजिंदर पाल सिंह बग्गा। इन तीनों की कहानी बड़ी ही रोचक एवं प्रेरणादायी है।