Friday, December 4, 2020
Home Opinions Recent Supreme Court judgement on Ayodhya is welcome, but there are questions on others

Recent Supreme Court judgement on Ayodhya is welcome, but there are questions on others

Also Read

G Indira
Author of the book: The India I Know and of Hinduism. Publications in -charge Pragna Bharati Organisation, Hyderabad. Academician and free-lancer

The Supreme Court CJI (Chief Justice of India), Deepak Mishra at the fag-end of his career delivered three-historic yet controversial verdicts, making him remember in the annals of Indian history forever to come.  The -1994-Ayodhya- mosque case, whether the mosque is mandated by the community for prayer or not, was over-ruled paving the way for an uninterrupted and unmitigated arguments on the title suit.

As is in the case of eminent domain Law, that is practised in other progressive western countries, Indian government has also every right to acquire the land of Ayodhya disputed site. Now the road is smoothened for arguments in the case of temple issue, the age-old dispute may be resolved hopefully before the 2019 parliamentary elections. That will give relief for the government and the people to work towards day-to-day issues of progress and development.

The judgement on -Section 497 of IPC– ‘Adultery no longer a criminal offence’ is a bit worrisome. It indicates that we are moving towards westernisation of India. I agree that a part of modern India is westernised but not the whole India in its entirety. The judges have made the section 497 from criminal to civil offence. Criminal is more coercive they might have thought in their wisdom as is in the case of section 377 of IPC (i.e LGBT rights).

As per all religions, Adultery is a sin. Marriage stands on edifice of faith between the married couple. Indian ethos is for ‘self-control or self-restraint’ not for ‘self-gratification or self-indulgence’. The courts go by the egalitarian principle of gender-justice. They are of the view that the Indian man treats his wife as “chattel” i.e his property like any other object. As a matter of fact, on the contrary, it is true of a woman also. A wife doesn’t permit her husband to do adultery or to have any illicit-relationships. She has law on her side to control.

Now with this judgement both are not bound by any restrictions to have adulterous relationships. That means we are moving into an open-society! The judges went by the syntax of law in imparting equality of gender, rather than the spirit of the country where marriage is sacrosanct. Now it has become a flimsy contract. Even in the case of Sabarimala Aiyyappa temple their stand was the same- ‘gender equality’.

However, Indians go by more of conventions than the laws made. A Law works only as a deterrent and a recourse when controversies arise. The resilience of Indian people that has survived their customs, practises and traditions from time to time though there were onslaughts on them will hopefully remain after these changes also, is the belief of many.

The dissent judgement is found to be more interesting in the Sabarimala case than the assent. I would go by what Indu Malhotra, the woman-Judge and what she had to say on the Sabarimalla in her dissent-judgement. She says: “Issues of deep religious sentiments should not be ordinarily be interfered by the court. The Sabarimala shrine and the deity are protected by Article 25 of the Constitution of India and the religious practices cannot be solely tested on the basis of Article 14.”

“Notions of rationality cannot be invoked in matters of religion,” said Justice Malhotra, adding: “What constitutes essential religious practice is for the religious community to decide, not for the court. India is a diverse country. Constitutional morality would allow all to practise their beliefs. The court should not interfere unless if there is any aggrieved person from that section or religion.”

“Present judgment won’t be limited to Sabarimala, it will have wide ramifications. Issues of deep religious sentiments shouldn’t be ordinarily interfered into,” said Justice Malhotra further.

She also said that “Religious practices can’t solely be tested on the basis of the right to equality. It’s up to the worshippers, not the court to decide what’s religion’s essential practice.”

In the sensitive matter of Sabarimalla, the government of the day should have taken the referendum of Hindu women, at least, online rather than to be decided by the Apex Court.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

G Indira
Author of the book: The India I Know and of Hinduism. Publications in -charge Pragna Bharati Organisation, Hyderabad. Academician and free-lancer

Latest News

NEP 2020: Revamping higher education and challenges ahead

Hope the government will implement NEP successfully in the higher education system and achieve all its goals in the predicted time. Thus, India will restore its role as a Vishwaguru.

Domestic violence: A grave concern

Domestic violence occurs when one person tries to dominate and control another person in a family-like or domestic relationship. Domestic violence involves...

Justin Trudeau’s unwarranted support to Farmers protests, was made on behest of Khalistani secessionists?

One has to wonder why Canadian PM has to make these unwarranted statements and the underlying aspect is, his coalition government is hanging with the support of the New Democratic Party which is a socialist far left political party and its leader is none other than Khalistani supporter Jagmeet Singh Dhaliwal.

BJP and the need for the saffron party to win GHMC

many, are making fun of this, that just to fight Owaisi brothers and the KCR, BJP had to put their full force in this election, but how many of us have realized the depth of this move by BJP?

Overview of voting trends of Muslims in Bihar election 2020

by observing the overall data, one can conclude that non-Muslim votes are divided into Muslim and non-Muslim candidates while Muslim votes are only divided among Muslim candidates.

Are the phrases “Brahmin left and Brahmin bailout”, a rhetoric of anti-semitism on Brahmin community?

The term Brahmin Left is a new phrase being used by Progressive left to showcase Brahmin community of India. It is not new that Brahmins community is often dragged in western media to malign them in a derogatory way.

Recently Popular

गुप्त काल को स्वर्ण युग क्यों कहा जाता है

एक सफल शासन की नींव समुद्रगप्त ने अपने शासनकाल में ही रख दी थी इसीलिए गुप्त सम्राटों का शासन अत्यधिक सफल रहा। साम्राज्य की दृढ़ता शांति और नागरिकों की उन्नति इसके प्रमाण थे।

Did this abusive journalist do a ‘fake interview’ while with Hindustan Times?

According to allegations, Swati Chaturvedi published a fake interview with George Fernandes.

सामाजिक भेदभाव: कारण और निवारण

भारत में व्याप्त सामाजिक असामानता केवल एक वर्ग विशेष के साथ जिसे कि दलित कहा जाता है के साथ ही व्यापक रूप से प्रभावी है परंतु आर्थिक असमानता को केवल दलितों में ही व्याप्त नहीं माना जा सकता।

वर्ण व्यवस्था और जाति व्यवस्था के मध्य अंतर और हमारे इतिहास के साथ किया गया खिलवाड़

वास्तव में सनातन में जिस वर्ण व्यवस्था की परिकल्पना की गई उसी वर्ण व्यवस्था को छिन्न भिन्न करके समाज में जाति व्यवस्था को स्थापित कर दिया गया। समस्या यह है कि आज वर्ण और जाति को एक समान माना जाता है जिससे समस्या लगातार बढ़ती जा रही है।

Pt Deen Dayal Upadhyaya and Integral Humanism

According to Upadhyaya, the primary concern in India must be to develop an indigenous economic model that puts the human being at centre stage.