Tuesday, October 20, 2020
Home Opinions Should it not be Yogi’s choice to wear or not wear a skull cap?

Should it not be Yogi’s choice to wear or not wear a skull cap?

Also Read

As our ‘secular’ media is going berserk on the fact that Yogi refused to wear a skull cap in the Mazar of Kabir Das when it was offered by a person there. For some news channels, it was a ‘breaking news’. Many maulanas, ‘intellectuals’ and politicians of ‘secular’ parties were called by various channels to debate it. They presented various arguments to say that Yogi was ‘communal’ to not wear the skull cap.

They said that as he is the Chief Minister of the largest state of India which has around 20% Muslim population and he has hurt the sentiments of those Muslims. Some other said that he holds the constitutional position and for him, all religions should be equal. Yet others said that he hates Muslims that’s why he refused to wear the skull cap. There were other arguments as well.

Now let’s see the arguments one by one. Yes, he is the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh and all religions should be equal to him. Now, how is not wearing a skull cap is discriminatory to everyone? It is his personal choice whether to wear it not. As for those people who have gone berserk by saying over and over again that the ‘secularism is in danger’, there is no such Constitutional duty to wear a skull cap if offered by anyone. So, the angle of constitutional argument does not even arise.

Secondly, some said that sentiments of Muslims of Uttar Pradesh have been hurt. If we go by this argument, then we are a country of around 135 crore people and everyone’s sentiment is hurt by some way or the other every second. Someone’s sentiment is hurt by a movie based on queen Padmini. Someone’s sentiment is hurt by a book of Taslima Nasreen and Salman Rushdie, someone’s sentiment is hurt if someone else eats beef. Someone’s sentiment is hurt by a song featuring a boy and girl winking at each other. Someone’s sentiment is hurt when they see some wordings of a burger company. Someone’s sentiment is hurt by not being allowed to celebrate with firecrackers. Every day, every hour, every minute, every second someone’s sentiment is hurt.

So, should every so-called ‘hurt sentiments’ be given this much importance that it blocks the personal rights and choices of a person? Secularism does not mean that you will be forced to wear a skull cap just to keep someone’s sentiment from being hurt.

The third argument is that Modi, Yogi, and other BJP leaders do wear turbans when they visit Gurudwara so why they are refusing to wear a skull cap. Again, here the simple counter-argument is it’s their choice to wear whatever they want. Just because they wear turbans in Gurudwaras, they can’t be forced to wear a skull cap. This country and its constitution give that much of personal liberty to each and every citizen.

The fourth argument is that Yogi is communal that’s why he did not wear the skull cap. So, had he taken that skull cap, he would have been proved a ‘secular’? Are these kinds of symbolism going to define the ‘secularism’ in this country? Whoever agrees to wear a skull cap is ‘secular’ and who refuses is ‘communal’. It’s really funny and rather juvenile to take the essence of secularism to these binaries.

‘Secularism’ did not arrive in this country when Indira Gandhi as a PM introduced this word into Constitution during the emergency. If that’s the argument someone is giving then, he or she is essentially saying that our great Constitution maker Baba Saheb Ambedkar was either communal or was unaware of a word called ‘secularism’. Secularism is the essence of this country for thousands of years and this cannot be judged by one narrow incident involving CM Yogi Adityanath.

All our ‘liberals’ are so obsessed by this word ‘Secularism’ that they use it so loosely that it has become one of the most hated words by a vast proportion of the population of this country. They should understand that secularism does not mean ‘appeasement’ by wearing skullcaps and throwing Iftaar Parties. This includes RSS and BJP as well. This appeasement of one community majority or minority over a period of time only leads to hatred between the communities. This is the primary reason as to why there is so much feeling of victimhood among the majority community and when ‘liberals’ and ‘intellectuals’ and our ‘secular media raises these types of issues of CM Yogi refusing to wear a skullcap leads to more poisoning of relations between the communities as people go into a defensive mode.

So, it is my earnest request to all the ‘seculars’ that if you want to wear a skull cap, do wear it, but don’t shame a person who does not want to wear it. If you are doing that, you are further sowing seeds of hatred. This particular quote is perfectly apt to describe this incident and the people who are shouting discrimination: “When you are Accustomed to Privilege, Equality Feels Like Oppression”.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

- Advertisement -

Latest News

शांत कश्मीर और चिदंबरम का 370 वाला तीर

डॉ. मनमोहन सिंह की सरकार के सबसे शक्तिशाली मंत्रियो में से एक चिदंबरम आज वही भाषा बोल रहे है जो पाकिस्तान संयुक्त राष्ट्र तथा अन्य अंतर्राष्ट्रीय मंचो पर बोलता आया है। चिदंबरम यही नहीं रुके उन्होंने अलगाववादियों को भी महत्व देने की बात कही है।

मिले न मिले हम- स्टारिंग चिराग पासवान

आज के परिपेक्ष्य में बिहार का चुनाव कई मायनो में अलग है। मुख्यमंत्री और उप मुख्यमंत्री पारम्परिक राजनीती वाली रणनीति का अनुसरण कर रहे है तो वही युवा चिराग और तेजस्वी विरासती जनाधार को नए भविष्य का सपना दिखने का प्रयास कर रहे है।

How BJP can win seats in Tamil Nadu and Kerala

It is time for BJP to eye on Tamil Nadu and Kerala. In Lok Sabha election 2024 BJP will win ±15 seats in TN and ±3 seats in Kerala.

Brace for ad Jihad

Delusionary fairy tale

Why this hullabaloo about shifting Bollywood?

Let the new film city emerge as the genuine centre for producing high quality films that are genuinely Indian and be helpful in building a strong value-based society.


The story of Indian ‘liberals’ has mostly been one of loud words and selective actions to suit their own narrative. They act as self-appointed messiahs but have themselves become the type of dogmatic cult that they professed they wanted to fight against. It’s apt that we titled this article “ill liberals” because they have clearly been ill for a long time, suffering from the megalomaniacal belief that they are the sole custodian of truth and the gatekeepers of morality and justice stifling every opposing view.

Recently Popular

Jallikattu – the popular sentiment & ‘The Kiss of Judas Bull’ incident

A contrarian view on the issue being hotly debated.

सामाजिक भेदभाव: कारण और निवारण

भारत में व्याप्त सामाजिक असामानता केवल एक वर्ग विशेष के साथ जिसे कि दलित कहा जाता है के साथ ही व्यापक रूप से प्रभावी है परंतु आर्थिक असमानता को केवल दलितों में ही व्याप्त नहीं माना जा सकता।

How I was saved from Love Jihad

A personal experience of a liberal urban woman and her close brush with Islam.

Twitter wrongfully reports Jammu & Kashmir’s location again

In February of this year Twitter was accused of getting Jammu & Kashmir’s location wrong.

हिंदू धर्म की भावनाओं को ठेस पहुंचाना कहां तक उचित है??

विज्ञापन में दिखाए गए पात्रों के धर्म एक दूसरे से बदल दिए जाएं तो क्या देश में अभी शांति रहती। क्या तनिष्क के शोरूम सुरक्षित रहते। क्या लिबरल तब भी अभिभ्यक्ती की स्वतन्त्रता की बात करते।