Home Blog Page 349

Should we continue working with BRICS?

Mukesh Choudhary
-
0
Should we continue working with BRICS?

Since we became a republic and sovereign state, we focused on neighbourhood first policy. we always tried our best to keep a better align with our neighbours. We’ve always been a peace-loving country we never opened any kind of war with any neighbour or any other country, always tried to resolve our issue with mutual understanding and bilateral talks. In this same way treaded China even China was not our neighbour country, but we supported during Tibet annexation, may be our leaders wanted it. Because of Tibet annexation we got a new powerful neighbour friend China, we never wanted to join USA, during these days anti USA policies were prevalent. And we wanted to be complete sovereign state so we declined USA military support offer during any foreign adversaries.

We can call this as our foreign policy mistake. We made mistake in recognising China’s intention and expansionism policy. We supported China in UN permanent member. But it all went awry for us. China opened an unexpected war against India in 1962. We were not ready for a sudden attack; it was like a jerk to our leaders. Somehow, we fought but unfortunately, we failed. China occupied a huge part of our Ladakh region. They started showing cartographic aggression towards India. China declined JOHNSON LINE the official line of British India with Tibet and made a new line McCarley McDonald line that is LAC.

Instances when China moved against India like

  • China protected the Pak based terrorism many times in UN
  • Raised Kashmir issue at UNSC blatantly in support of Pak
  • Blocked India’s entry in NSG
  • Increased interference in Nepal’s domestic politics
  • Claimed a large part of land that belongs to Bhutan
  • Ladakh face off (recent and burning issue)

In wake of recent faceoff, we took some stringent steps against China. Banning on Chinese apps, cancelling many govt and private sector projects with China. So now thing after all this should we keep working with groups like BRICS, where china is dominant in decision making or policy making.

india and china

NDB (new development bank) formerly known as BRICS Development Bank. The bank is established by BRICS in July 2015 as a treaty was signed in July 2014 to establish the bank for BRICS nation cooperation.

Each following member of the bank has initially subscribed 100k shares, in total of $10 billion, of which 20k shares corresponded to paid in capital.

Head quarter of bank situated in china’s city Shanghai, and china has most and vast share in bank worth 41% of total.

Another bank where China leads and India has invested: Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank – purposed by china in 2013 and initially launched oct 2014 in Chinese capital Beijing.

Even US and Japan gave criticised this bank and have not joined. They seen it as a potential rival to the world bank and IMF (international monetary fund)

India invested a huge amount of $8367.3 million worth share of 8.6489%

Investment of China is $29780.4 million worth 30.7827% of total share far more than India we are smaller economy in compare to China we can’t invest such huge amount as China does. So we have we have limited power in decision making.

The Indian foreign strategy looks very perplexed as it is set to join the expansion of G7 country. It is also looking to join the purposed D-10 designed to keep china out of 5G market. India is part of QUAD group, Yet India has parked billions in china led bank that counter American strategy.

A different choice to make for India:

The huge factor behind India’s decision on cooperation with BRICS is Russia. Relationship with Russia have changed quite a bit for India in the last 3-4 years. Primarily reasons behind it is the sanctions on Russia by US and energy deals between Russia and China.

Final word is that we should ponder over on our Foreign strategy specially with China.

जो भविष्य में तख्त़ और SOTY-3 को 100 करोड़ की opening दिलाएंगे, उनके लिए जल में रहकर मगरों से बैर पाल रही है यह औरत

pulkitnpc
-
0
जो भविष्य में तख्त़ और SOTY-3 को 100 करोड़ की opening दिलाएंगे, उनके लिए जल में रहकर मगरों से बैर पाल रही है यह औरत

क्यों लड़ रही है?  गलत लोगों से पंगा ले रही है.. पागल है ये औरत.. कुछ नहीं कर पाएगी.. कुछ नहीं बदलेगा..इसके जैसे कई आकर चले गए.. नाटक कर रही है.. अपनी निजी भड़ास निकालने के लिए.. ये सब एक जैसे हैं.. नौटंकी है सब

लॉकडाउन के चलते चाय की दुकानें और अधिकतर बाज़ार बंद हैं इसलिए इन दिनों इस तरह के कई संवाद सोशल मीडिया एवं व्हाट्सएप पर पढ़ने को मिल जाते हैं। इसलिए क्योंकि यह मुद्दा असम और बिहार में उफनती नदियों एवं चीन द्वारा विश्व को भेंट किए गए वायरस से जान गवां देने वालों से अधिक महत्वपूर्ण है। और होगा भी क्यों नहीं इसमें ग्लैमर और करोड़पति लोग जो शामिल हैं। लेकिन एक और तार्किक कारण भी है जिससे यह विषय असम बिहार की उफनती नदियों जितना ही महत्वपूर्ण हो जाता है, वह यह कि इसके पीछे प्रकृति नहीं बल्कि मनुष्यों का हाथ है।

पिछले कुछ हफ्तों से सत्ताओं को उखाड़ फेंकने, समाज को बदल देने एवं दुनिया को देखने का एक नया नज़रिया देने वाले स्वघोषित क्रांतिकारियों की सेना या आसान शब्द में कहें तो बॉलीवुड को अपनी अपने ही कुकर्म छुपाना मुश्किल हो रहा है। 

मामला शुरू होता है बिहार के रहने वाले और दिल्ली कॉलेज ऑफ इंजीनियरिंग के पूर्व छात्र एवं एक उम्दा कलाकार रहे सुशांत सिंह राजपूत की मृत्यु से। 14 जून 2020 को सुशांत सिंह राजपूत अपने मुंबई स्थित फ्लैट में मृत पाए जाते हैं, देखकर यही प्रतीत होता है कि उन्होंने खुदकुशी की है। उनके पास कोई सुसाइड नोट एवं किसी प्रकार की कोई अन्य सूचना न मिलने के कारण विभिन्न लोगों द्वारा भिन्न-भिन्न बातें सामने आती हैं और यह तर्क भी लोगों के समक्ष आता है की हो सकता है यह सुसाइड नहीं बल्कि कत्ल हो। बहुत से बॉलीवुड के निर्माता, निर्देशक, लेखक एवं अन्य कलाकार इस पर अपने विचार प्रस्तुत करते हैं जिनमें से एक थीं पहाड़ों के राज्य हिमाचल से आने वाली अदाकारा कंगना राणावत। कंगना यह तर्क सामने रखती हैं कि सुशांत सिंह राजपूत द्वारा की गई खुदकुशी एक किस्म का कत्ल है क्योंकि बॉलीवुड के कई लोगों द्वारा सुशांत सिंह राजपूत का मानसिक उत्पीड़न किया गया। यह तर्क कितना सही या गलत है इस बात की पुष्टि तो कुछ नहीं है लेकिन यह चिंगारी आग उस समय बन जाती है जब कंगना राणावत रिपब्लिक टीवी पर अर्नब गोस्वामी को एक साक्षात्कार देती हैं जिसमें वह सुशांत की मृत्यु को बॉलीवुड की एक सुनियोजित साज़िश की तरह बताती हैं। 

अब जैसा कि एक मजा़किया कहावत है कि जब सारे कॉकरोच खुले में आकर फड़फड़ाने लगे तो समझ जाएं कि दवा सही जगह गिरी है। कंगना ने इस साक्षात्कार में अपने कुछ विचार प्रकट क्या किए कि अपने आप को बुद्धिजीवी, सभ्य एवं नारीवादी बताने वाली बॉलीवुड इंडस्ट्री यूं छटपटा कर अलग-अलग सोशल मीडिया पर आई मानो किसी ने कोई निषेधिक वस्तु को बेनकाब कर दिया हो। कंगना ने अलग-अलग लोगों जैसे कि करण जौहर, महेश भट्ट, जावेद अख्तर पर कुछ इल्ज़ाम एवं टिप्पणियां प्रस्तुत कीं कि किस प्रकार ये लोग नेपोटिज्म़ यानि कि भाई भतीजावाद को बढ़ावा देने में एक अहम भूमिका निभाते हैं। कंगना के मुताबिक एक विशेष अभिजात वर्ग ही बॉलीवुड पर हावी रहता है एवं अन्य किसी बाहर से आने वाले व्यक्ति का यह वर्ग मिलकर उत्पीड़न करता है। और सबसे जरूरी बात यह है कि बॉलीवुड के अन्य लोग न केवल इस तबके की चमचागिरी करते हैं बल्कि किसी सवाल उठाने वाले की आवाज़ को भी दबाने का पूरा कार्य करते हैं।

कंगना के केवल इतना कहने और साक्षात्कार को केवल 24 घंटे मात्र होने की देर भी न थी कि उनकी यह बात प्रमाणित हो गई जब बॉलीवुड के बड़े-बड़े दिग्गजों द्वारा टि्वटर पर उनके और उनके इस बयान के खिलाफ भिन्न-भिन्न टिप्पणियां एवं प्रतिक्रियाएं सामने आने लगीं। अनुभव सिन्हा एवं अनुराग कश्यप जैसे निर्देशक जिनका कंगना ने जिक्र करना तो दूर बल्कि नाम तक नहीं लिया था के द्वारा अजीब प्रतिक्रियाएं सामने आईं। जहां अनुराग कश्यप ने कंगना के इस बयान को राजनीति से प्रेरित बताया-

वहीं खुद को लेखक एवं निर्देशक बताने वाले अनुभव सिन्हा ने तो अलग ही अंदाज़ में अपनी प्रतिक्रिया प्रस्तुत की जिससे उनके मन के भाव ज़ाहिर हुए हों या नहीं पर यह जरूर समझ आ गया कि सिन्हा साहब को अपने लेखक होने पर एक बार आत्ममंथन अवश्य करना चाहिए-

महेश भट्ट का तो मानो पूरा परिवार ही कंगना पर कूच करने को उतर आया-

चौंकाने वाली एवं मज़े की बात यह रही कि अनुभव सिन्हा और अनुराग कश्यप जैसे लोगों का ‘आ बैल मुझे मार’ या उत्तर भारत के शब्दों में कहें तो ‘उड़ता तीर लेना’ इस बात को प्रमाणित कर गया कि कंगना ने जो कहा वह सत्य प्रतीत होता हुआ दिखा और बॉलीवुड की जी-हुज़ूरी और गुलामी की एक तस्वीर आम जनता के सामने आ गई।

कंगना ने ताप्सी पन्नू और स्वरा भास्कर जैसी कुछ अभिनेत्रियों पर भी निशाना साधा और कहा कि वे चाहें जितनी कोशिश कर लें खुद को उस हावी अभिजात वर्ग की अभिनेत्रियों के बराबर रखने की, वे इसमें कभी सफल नहीं हो पाएंगी।

तथ्यात्मक तौर पर सही होते हुए भी शायद तापसी एवं स्वरा को कंगना की बात पसंद नहीं आई या शायद इसका कोई अन्य वैचारिक मतभेद जैसा कारण रहा हो लेकिन उन्होंने भी अपने ट्वीट्स के द्वारा अपनी असहमति प्रस्तुत की-

सबसे ज्यादा मनोरंजक तो महान पत्रकार श्री राजदीप सरदेसाई द्वारा श्री जावेद अख़्तर, फरहान अख़्तर और ज़ोया अख़्तर को अपने चैनल पर बुलाकर नेपोटिज्म़ और इस पूरे प्रकरण पर उनकी राय लेना रहा। इससे बड़ी विडंबना और क्या हो सकती है। यह वैसा ही है जैसा कि किसी मध्य पूर्व के देश के लोगों से महिलाओं के अधिकारों पर राय लेना।

बॉलीवुड से विभिन्न प्रतिक्रियाएं आने के बाद आम जनता द्वारा भी इस साक्षात्कार को कई अलग-अलग नज़रिए से देखा गया जिसमें अधिकतर लोग कंगना के साथ खड़े दिखे वहीं कई लोगों ने उनके इस कृत्य को मौकापरस्ती या मूर्खतापूर्ण भी बताया। 

अब सवाल यह उठता है कि कंगना यह क्यों और किसके लिए कर रही हैं? 

अगर कंगना के अपने करियर की बात करें तो एक छोटे से शहर की एक मध्यमवर्गीय परिवार से उठकर आई लड़की जो अपने काम के बल पर अब तक 2 नेशनल अवॉर्ड, पद्मश्री एवं अन्य फिल्म फेयर अवार्ड अपने नाम कर चुकी है क्या उसे करियर के इस स्तर पर आकर अपने एक मित्र की मृत्यु पर राजनीति एवं मौकापरस्ती करने की आवश्यकता है? 

क्वीन, तनु वेड्स मनु 1-2, मणिकर्णिका, गैंगस्टर, फैशन जैसी फिल्मों में अपने अभिनय का लोहा मनवा चुकी यह अदाकारा क्या अपने करियर की इस ऊंचाई पर आकर इस तरह की हरकत को अंजाम देना आवश्यक समझेगी?

एक कलाकार को उसके अंदर का X-फैक्टर आम लोगों से अलग बनाता है, अब कुछ लोग इस X-फैक्टर को सकारात्मक तो वहीं कुछ नकारात्मक तौर पर देखते हैं। कुछ लोग इसे पागलपन कहकर भी संबोधित करते हैं लेकिन अगर देखा जाए तो यह पागलपन ही उस कलाकार को अन्य दुनिया से भिन्न बनाता है और वह दुनिया बाद में उसी पागलपन की दीवानी भी हो जाती है। कंगना या उनके इस कदम को पागलपन कहकर संबोधित करने वाले बॉलीवुड के ही कुछ लोगों को यह ध्यान रखना चाहिए कि अगर वह खुद और कंगना दोनों को ही एक दर्जे का कलाकार मानते हैं तो उन्हें स्वीकार करना पड़ेगा कि वह भी इसी तरह के किसी पागलपन से ग्रस्त हैं और होना भी चाहिए।

दूसरा सवाल यह आता है कि कंगना जो कर रही हैं क्या इससे कुछ बदलेगा? या बॉलीवुड में यूं ही वंशवाद एवं भाई भतीजावाद और एक वर्ग विशेष का ही अधिकार बना रहेगा और बाहर से आने वाले कलाकारों को इसी प्रकार के मानसिक उत्पीड़न का सामना करते रहना पड़ेगा?

ऐसा तो नहीं है कि कंगना इस क़िस्म की पहल करने वाली ऐसी पहली कलाकार हैं। इस मौके पर उन्हीं का कटाक्ष कर रहे अनुराग कश्यप स्वयं एक लंबे समय तक इस बीमारीनुमा प्रथा का शिकार रह चुके हैं। आज के समय में वे इसके बारे में बात करना तो दूर बल्कि उन लोगों के समक्ष जा खड़े हुए हैं जो इस तरह की प्रथा के सूत्रधार हैं। अब इसका कारण क्या है यह तो स्वयं कश्यप साहब ही जानें।

हिंदी की एक कहावत है कि अकेला चना भाड़ नहीं फोड़ सकता, यही चीज़ इस समस्या पर भी लागू होती है। बॉलीवुड के किसी अंदरूनी कलाकार मात्र के विरोध करने से यह प्रथा नहीं खत्म होने वाली, जैसा कि हम भूतकाल में भी देख चुके हैं। जब तक आम लोग, हम-आप किसी भी प्रकार की कला की सराहना, अच्छे को अच्छा, बुरे को बुरा कहना नहीं सीखेंगे तब तक कोई भी कलाकार अकेला यह लड़ाई नहीं जीत सकता।

एक और बड़ी बात यह, जब तक किसी मनुष्य के पेट में रोटी नहीं होगी तब तक उसकी कला भी उभर कर सामने नहीं आएगी। तो आज के पूंजीवादी समाज में केवल सराहना कर देना मात्र उपाय नहीं है, वित्तीय तौर पर सहयोग अति आवश्यक है। अलग-अलग किस्म के विज्ञापन, प्रचार या समीक्षाओं से सम्मोहित न होकर अपने दिमाग एवं दिल का इस्तेमाल करते हुए किसी भी कला को पहचानना और उसके आधार पर ही उसे सराहना या आर्थिक सहयोग प्रदान करना ही हमारी शैली होनी चाहिए।

जैसा कि हमने देखा है कि समीक्षाओं और विज्ञापनों में भी पैसे और ताकत के दम पर हेरफेर संभव है तो इस किस्म की समीक्षाओं पर भी आंख बंद करके विश्वास कर लेना मूर्खता होगी।

अगर आप भी चाहते हैं कि आपकी आने वाली पीढ़ी राजकुमार राव, मनोज बाजपई, कंगना राणावत, आदित्य धर, अमर कौशिक, मनोज मुंतशिर आदि जैसे सपने बिना इस भय के देख और पूरे कर सके कि कहीं इस बॉलीवुड नाम के दलदल में उनका अंत भी सुशांत सिंह राजपूत जैसे उम्दा कलाकार जैसा न हो तो उसके लिए आपको आज और अभी से ही अपना आर्थिक एवं मानसिक सहयोग अच्छे कलाकारों एवं कला को देना होगा। अगर आज ही से हमने यह प्रण लिया कि हम विज्ञापनों और प्रचारों में न बह कर एक खुले दिमाग एवं मन से मेहनत का मूल्य एवं अच्छी कला का आंकलन करेंगे तो शायद आने वाले भविष्य में हम किसी अन्य सुशांत सिंह राजपूत को बचा सकें और यही उस महान कलाकार के प्रति हमारी सबसे बड़ी श्रद्धांजलि होगी।

Indian economic restoration: Four steps in the right direction

deepaktalwar
-
0
Indian economic restoration: Four steps in the right direction

Indian Economy was in a state of recovery before the COVID-19 crisis impacted the lives of over 130 crore people. As the entire world awaits a medical ray of hope, the consistent damage to the economy, especially one as delicate as India, cannot be ignored. Policy analyst Deepak Talwar says that we need to take reasonable risks to restore economic prosperity as the pandemic is expected to engulf the entire year, but economic damage by the end of 2020 could be irreparable. Keeping this in mind, here are four steps that can be considered as initial milestones on the road to Indian economic restoration:-

Portal for skill identification

In June, the Uttar Pradesh government saw an influx of 32 lakh migrant workers from different parts of the country and out of this, 23.5 lakh successfully underwent a call-based survey for skill mapping. The idea is to form a database of these people which consists of their personal information, work skill under 94 categories, and preference of state to work in. A national level application of this model could create a reliable one-stop source for worker information, thereby streamlining the manpower need of various MSMEs and promote equal access to employment opportunities.

Re-opening Local Shops

Policy analyst Deepak Talwar says that local shops are the backbone of community. This has to two aspects: re-opening and customer stigma. During Unlock 1.0, fair numbers of shops have re-opened with sanitization norms and odd-even market schemes while others fear the impact of customer stigma. COVID-19 has sowed the seeds of fear among people and thus, they prefer to shop online via Grofers, Big Basket, JioMart, etc, instead of visiting their local shopkeeper. However, awareness needs to be spread among people in order to empower local sellers and restore economic as well as psychological normality.

Improved policies for workers

Employer negligence has gained spotlight during the migrant crisis due to the absence of medical care, sanitation services, employee benefits, worker database, and basic pandemic support. In such cases, corporate barons and industrial magnates need to re-evaluate their policies for workers. This may include shifting them from daily wage to project or monthly employment, assisting them with ration card and similar documentation, improved incentives, and health covers. People working in factories have long working hours, which makes them prone to health hazards. It is high time that employers realize their responsibilities and take a stand for workers.  

Factories Re-opening

Factories have been a source of bulk employment for labour since decades. While skilled workers operate machinery, its counterpart looks after logistics and packaging. Re-opening factories can set off a chain reaction which re-creates the balance of worker ratio present in the states and further, promotes product push in the markets. With the festival season inbound, clothing, gold, and other industries have a big opportunity to restore market functioning. However, “factories need to be re-opened in a safe manner,” says Deepak Talwar, in order to avoid adverse circumstances. This includes promoting work from home, free masks to workers, and availability of sanitizers across the factory for extreme precaution.

An amalgamation of these four steps has great potential to restore Indian economic prosperity. Undoubtedly, it will be a time consuming and tedious process, but a swift action today is the only way towards a brighter future tomorrow. COVID-19 has changed the way people look at the world and it is time that their livelihoods are restored to revive the old definition of normal. 

“जान भी, जहान भी”

gdbinani
-
0
“जान भी, जहान भी”

इसी 13 जुलाई, सोमवार को विश्व स्वास्थ्य संगठन के महानिर्देशक ने एक चेतावनी जारी की कि आने वाले समय में संक्रमण की स्थिति और भयावह होगी और हमारे यहाँ उसके बाद रविवार 19 जुलाई को इन्डियन मेडीकल एसोसिएशन के चेयरमैन डॉक्टर वी के मोंगा  ने  स्पष्ट शब्दों में घोषणा की है कि देश में कोरोना का कम्यूनिटी ट्रांसमिशन यानि सामुदायिक फैलाव शुरू हो चुका है। यानी हालात आगे और बिगड़ सकते हैं। ग्रामीण इलाकों में संक्रमण फैल रहा है वह बहुत ही चिंता का विषय है। उसके अलावा जिस तरह से संक्रमितों की संख्या रोज सामने आ रही है वह इसको पुष्ट भी करता है हाँलाकि हमारे यहाँ दिल्ली में इसे नियंत्रण करने में सफलता भी मिली है और बाकी हिस्सों में भी संक्रमण से मुक्त होने वालों की संख्या भी बढ़ रही है। लेकिन एक बात तो स्पष्ट हो रही है कि भविष्य में हालात सुधरने वाले है नहीं क्योंकि अभी तक तमाम प्रयासों के बावजूद भी इसका कोई ठोस ट्रीटमेंट उपलब्ध नहीं हुआ है हाँलाकि इसके उपचार वाली वैक्सीन का अब अन्तिम परीक्षण चालू हो चूका है।

जैसा आप सभी जानते हैं कि सबसे पहले सरकार ने संक्रमण की गति पर विराम लगाने के उद्देश्य से पूर्णबन्दी लागू की लेकिन उम्मीद के मुताबिक हालात में सुधार नहीं देखने मिला जिसके कारणों में से एक नागरिकों की लापरवाही वाली भूमिका ने सरकार को चिन्ताग्रस्त कर दिया। इसलिये ही प्रधानमंत्री नरेंद्र मोदीजी ने मंगलवार 30 जून को देश के नाम 16 मिनट का संबोधन दिया। उनका पूरा भाषण कोरोना पर फोकस रहा। उन्होंने लोगों से लापरवाही न करने की अपील की। कहा,”अब हमें ज्यादा सतर्क रहने की जरूरत है, पर अब हम ज्यादा लापरवाह होते जा रहे हैं।” उन्होंने हाथ जोड़कर  कहा की आज जब हमें ज्यादा सतर्कता की जरूरत है तो लापरवाही बढ़ना बहुत ही चिंता का कारण है। आगे प्रधानमंत्री ने कहा कि आपसे प्रार्थना करता हूँँ, आग्रह करता हूँँ कि स्वस्थ रहिए। दो गज की दूरी का पालन करते रहिए। गमछा, फेसकवर, मास्क का उपयोग करिए और कोई लापरवाही मत करिए। जिस तरह से सोशल डिस्टेंसिंग को समझाया  और अनुपालना पर जोर दिया और सरकारी एडवाइजरी का पालन करते हुये सोशल डिस्टेंसिंग को सही ढ़ंग से अपनाने का जो अनुरोध किया यानि उनके द्वारा बतायेगये महत्व को समझने के पश्चात सभी पक्ष प्रधानमंत्रीजी की सोशल डिस्टेंसिंग वाली सलाह की पालना पर  जोर दे रहे हैं।

वैसे तो हमारे लिये  सोशल डिस्टेंसिंग का अर्थ यही है कि आपस में मिलने-जुलने या सामाजिक आयोजनों का हिस्सा होने से बचना यानि  एक-दूसरे से दूरी बना कर रहना ताकि संक्रमण के ख़तरे को टाला या कहिये कम किया जा सके लेकिन वास्तव में इसका अर्थ इससे कहीं विस्तृत है/ ब्यापक है। इसलिये सामाजिक रूप से दूरी तो रखनी ही है इसके अलावा भी अनेक तरह की दूरी रखनी है जिसको ठीक तरह से समझ लीजिये। जो इस प्रकार है –

1) हर उस जीवित या निर्जीव वस्तु से दूरी है जिसे आप नहींं जानते है।
२ ) जहाँ जहाँ  सम्भव हो यानि खासकर आफिस / दुकान /पूजा स्थल यानि मन्दिर वगैरह / मॉल में घूसने और निकलने के लिए अलग गेट हों ताकि घुसते और निकलते समय एकदम पास से न निकलना पड़े।
३ ) आपको क्या पता सड़क और या सीढ़ियों पर जिस रेलिंग को आप छू रहे हैं उसे किसी संक्रमित व्यक्ति ने आपसे पहले छुआ है या नहीं  इसलिये किसी भी वास्तु को छूने की सख्त मनाही यानि छुएं ही नहीं।
४ ) बैंक में, किसी के ऑफिस या किसी दुकान पर जिस टेबल या डेस्क का सहारा लेकर आप खड़े हो जाते हैं उसको पहले किसी संक्रमित व्यक्ति ने छुआ है या नहीं  यह आप नहीं जानते इसलिये सहारा न लें ।
५ ) बाहर जाकर किसी भी सरफेस पर आप बिना सोचे समझे बैठ जाते है, आपको क्या पता पहले वहां कौन बैठा था या किसी संक्रमित व्यक्ति के ड्रापलेट वहां गिरे हए हैं या नही इसलिये किसी भी जगह बैठना बन्द कर दें।
६ ) नीचे जमीन पर और सीढ़ियों पर तो बिल्कुल ना बैठें।
७ ) घर पर भी मेहमान या रिश्तेदार आयेंगे ही तब आप घर में होते हुये भी मास्क पहन पूरी दो गज की दूरी से ही उनका आदर-सत्कार करें बल्कि मैं तो यही निवेदन करूँगा कि अपनी सुरक्षा को ध्यान में रखते हुये घर में भी मास्क पहन कर ही रहें यानि किसी भी प्रकार की जोखिम न उठ़ायें।
८ ) अभिवादन का तरीका भी अब  नमस्कार हो गया है अतः दूर से ही आपस में नमस्ते कर औपचारिकता निभायें ताकि सोशल डिस्टेंसिंग की पालना हो जाये।
९ ) अक्सर यह देखा गया है की लोग कहीं भी अनजाने स्कूटर या कार का सहारा लेकर खड़े रहते है। ये भी पूरी तरह गलत है।
१०) कहीं भी जाए तो लिफ्ट का उपयोग ना करें। अगर कोई ऑपरेटर है तभी लिफ्ट का उपयोग करें ताकि आप लिफ्ट के सरफेस को ना छुए। थोड़ा सीढ़ियां चढ़ लेंगे तो स्वस्थ रहेंगे।
११) यदि स्वचालित लिफ्ट है तो गंतब्य तल्ले के बटन को टूथपिक से दबायें और उसे कचरे में डाल दें। लिफ्ट में भी सभी सोशल डिस्टेन्सिग की पालना का पूरा पूरा ध्यान रखें।
१२) अबसे आप जब भी आफिस से लौटें या बाजार से घर में प्रवेश के साथ साथ नहानघर में जाकर सारे कपड़े साबुन मिले गर्म पानी में ड़ुबोने के बाद स्वयं भी साबुन लगाकर नहा लें।

कहने का मतलब सिर्फ इतना है कि वायरस अब दो व्यक्तियों के कॉन्टैक्ट से भी ज्यादा किसी सरफेस को अनजाने में छूने से ज्यादा फैल रहा है। इसलिए दूरी बनाए रखने के साथ साथ किसी भी अनजानी  चीज़ या सरफेस को टच करने से बचेंअगर गलती से छू भी लिया तो तुरंत हाथ धोयें या सैनीटाइजर से हाथ साफ कर लें।

अनेक कोरोना पॉज़िटिव लोगों को उपरोक्त तथ्यों को जानकर बहुत आश्चर्य हुआ क्योंकि वे तो यही मान रहे थे कि वे तो सामाजिक दूरी वगैरह को फॉलो सही ढ़ग से कर रहे थे फिर वे कोरोना पॉज़िटिव कैसे हुये।

अन्त में मैं आप से निवेदन करता हूँ कुछ दिन बाद आने वाले राखी बन्धन पर आप न तो अपनी बहन/बेटियों को बुलायें और न ही अपनी बहन/बेटियों को उनके पीहर भेंजें। साथ ही राखी का भी आदान प्रदान न करें क्योंकि राखी बाजार से न भी लानी पड़े लेकिन सोच लीजिये कि कोरियर करने पर कितने हाथों से गुजरेगी और उसी सबसे हमें बचाव रखना आवश्यक है। इसलिये आप आपस में अभी से फोन पर  या वाट्सएप पर सूचना दे दें कि हम हमारे घर पर उपलब्ध राखी/मौली बँधवा लेंगे।

उपरोक्त तथ्यों के अलावा भी आपको और ज्ञात हो तो अच्छी बात है। मैंने तो याद कर आप सभी से इसलिये ही सांझा किया ताकि आप इन बातों को अपनाकर आने वाले समय में पूर्ण रूपेण सुरक्षित तरीक़े से जीवन बिता सकें क्योंकि प्रधानमंत्री मोदीजी ने भारत के उज्ज्वल भविष्य, समृद्ध और स्वस्थ भारत के लिए २४ मार्च, मंगलवार को समझाये गये “जान है तो जहान है” को बदल ११ अप्रैल, शनिवार को “जान भी, जहान भी” कहकर स्पष्ट सन्देश दिया कि अब जान और जहान दोनों पहलुओं पर ध्यान केन्द्रित करना आवश्यक है। अब देश का प्रत्येक व्यक्ति “जान भी, जहान भी”,  दोनों की चिंता करते हुए अपने दायित्व निभाएगा साथ ही साथ  सरकार और प्रशासन के दिशा-निर्देशों का पालन करेगा।

अगर आपकी समझ में आ गया हो तो अपने दोस्तों और सम्बन्धियों  को भी इसका लाभ दें।

–गोवर्धन दास बिन्नाणी

Women and we men

Prashant Bajpai
-
0
Women and we men

Undoubtedly, after 73 years of independence, a rapid shift to modernisation can be observed so far. Perhaps this is a bitter truth related to half of the population that still we have the limiting factors for women. Somewhere, women also disregarded this fact that in reliance of 2-3 exceptions, how can the entire class of women be considered self dependent?

Since the practice of co-leveling men and women by the concept of feminism doesn’t seem sensible, especially in a country like India. It is so because any social and religious ritual is incomplete without the presence of women in our country. Women have always been considered as an epitome of strength and ability.

Among various definitions of feminism, the most widely accepted is “Feminism means equality for women”. Obviously, it seems very positive. But, “are women deprived of equal rights?” Today, feminism is represented as being equal to men, but on what parameters? The girls, doped in fiery modernisation, try to imitate men in the name of equality whether the reference is wrong or right; which is completely perverse. They are totally unaware of what actually self-reliance and equality are.

Yet as a nation, we believe in “यत्र नार्यस्तु पूज्यन्ते रमन्ते तत्र देवता”. No country around the globe is dignified as a mother as we have “Bharat Mata”. Particularly in our fundamentals where women hold a prior place to men, the pro-western movement of pseudo feminism is having no existence.

Today, the Indian woman is working in every field in the endeavor, but our human thinking is hindering her progress. When a married woman wants to move forward in her career or to be self-reliant, her family members first object to it. Despite being highly educated, the woman is still unable to take decisions in her family, society and even her own affairs. At the time of decision making, the woman herself becomes dependent on the man. Simply because she does not consider herself mentally more capable than men.This is why when it is too much with the woman, she lacks in opposing.

The Indian constitution provides equal rights for both men and women. But due to illiteracy and domestic religious traditions, women have not been able to make full use of all those rights. Despite a comparatively lower illiteracy rate, women have set new records in every field of science, business, space, sports and politics. Today’s women have come to know their importance and are also trying to prove themselves. Its resulting out positively as well. Be it education or politics or elsewhere, they have started participating in large numbers in every field, which shows their importance.

-Prashant Bajpai

PETA compares Artificial Insemination to rape: Mums remain mum

Ramesh Roy
-
0
PETA compares Artificial Insemination to rape: Mums remain mum

While watching a video by Opindia Editor Ajeet Bharti titled “PETA वालों की हिन्दूघृणा | Why is PETA India pushing Hinduphobia?” I was filled with disgust towards Peta India. There were several points of concern that included Hindu hatred, Hypocrisy of Peta India, virtue-signaling Hindus, and trolling of Shefali Vaidya by Peta India where she was called a snake. Calling a snake for insulting someone is a typical Abrahamic mindset where the snake is said to be the reason for the fall of Adam and Eve and resulting in paradise lost. Various Peta brand ambassadors have been known for promoting meat-eating and animal products. But it has never called them out and disassociated from them.

However, the main thing that hurt me the most was the tweet by Peta India where it compared the Artificial Insemination of cows and buffaloes to rape. Going by the same logic Artificial Insemination of Humans also amounts to rape. Yet it is unclear why several moms have remained silent and have not taken any action against Peta India.

The process of Artificial Insemination is more or less the same for humans and Animals. It has sometimes proved out to be helpful to conserve the wildlife which is vulnerable and is on the verge of extinction. It has also helped various mothers to bear children and have a family.

But, in order to simply remain in the headlines to get free advertising through media coverage, Peta indulges in such nonsensical tactics in spite of doing anything helpful for the animals. Peta India is known for offering suggestions to sacrifice animals during Id and its brand ambassadors are known to promote meat and animal products. It has also been known to needless euthanization, killing pets after stealing, manipulation, and eco-terrorism.

Peta India seems to have taken the quote “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” from the book Animal Farm by George Orwell quite literally where it decides which breeds of animals should be permitted to live and which breeds of animals must be killed.

Apart from these, Peta has also engaged in funding terrorism.

Peta is a hypocritical organisation which claims to be an organisation of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals but ends up harming animals more than it protects.

The hypocrisy of Peta must be called out and dehumanizing the people in the guise of animal activism must be called out as well. It is time for the mothers to call out Peta for their ridiculous tweet of comparing Artificial Insemination to rape.

To all the J Sai Deepak fans

arandomspectator
-
0
To all the J Sai Deepak fans
  1. He has never run away from any questions.
  2. He always gives as good as he gets, usually never holding back his punches.
  3. He never fumbles.
  4. He gives Dr.Anand Ranganathan, a run for his money in the competition of speaking fast.
  5. “Feminists” always turn red-faced after they pontificate on the Sabarimala case in front of him.
  6. He wears two watches and always re-wears a watch on his left hand after completing a speech/lecture

All humor and admiration aside, I as a fan of him, after scrolling through the comments under his videos, the comments under his tweets and in retweets, have observed that, J Sai Deepak is hailed as the saviour of the Hindus. I would like to go beyond this truth, and add my personal observations and suggestions for the way forward.

We as Hindus have been victims of trans-generational trauma that has not been given due credit under our education system and in our history textbooks. It is the Hindus that have been oppressed in their own land by foreign invaders of all hues and have forgotten to stand our ground on civilizational issues that are historically and factually accurate, without a doubt. Like J Sai Deepak, the Dharmic warrior from the younger generation, we have had and still have such warriors like him in the older generation like, the greats and most honorable Shri K Parasan, Shri CS Vaidyanathan etc. Sai himself, is a humble student of such luminaries and is unabashed in attributing to them in many of his lectures, tweets and writings.

Keeping all this aside, one common comment he receives is, “We need more people like Sai for the Hindu cause”.

This is where I would differ. More than a Hindu needing J Sai Deepak, J Sai Deepak needs you.

Now, one might wonder as to how and why such a stalwart like Sai would need an average Hindu, when has a wonderful intellect and to top it all, a fantastic research team.

Answer is, Sai fights the legal battles on behalf on Hindus, not for money, but for Dharma. He represents all the levels of Hindu sentiment and his mighty arsenal would definitely be much more “lethal” if the knowledge of the average Hindu is added. The Hindu must make himself useful for him by taking an interest in the Indic civilisation starting from any point- temples, culture, illegal immigration etc. Specialize in any one of these and contribute to him. If a Hindu wishes for Sai to keep fighting for Hindus, one must ask, what ammunition have you provided him in order to fight for your interests?

Apart from praises in all forums of social media, perhaps we must make ourselves useful for Sai. While many “comrades” make themselves “useful idiots” for Breaking India forces with such vigor and passion, what is stopping us from making ourselves useful for people like Sai?

The battle for civilization is not merely limited to social media. There are enough capable people to save the civilization on social media. What lacks is Bhamashahs that Sai constantly implores us to be. Hone your skills and enrich yourself with knowledge, dear passionate Hindu.

Simple ways to become a useful asset to Sai:

  1. Learn Indic languages and be proficient in them.
  2. Take up reading of our Itihasa and Puranas apart from regional texts and sthalapuranas
  3. Take an interest in the temple nearby. Make notes or blog about their structure, history, traditions, rituals, cultural contribution etc.
  4. Read as many books as possible, from both ideological spectra, step out of the air-conditioned room and engage in what is now known as community service, but was previously known as duty.
  5. Expand your knowledge on the civilization by not paying heed to the gossip behind everyone engaged this cause, even from within the community, but by paying heed to the accuracy of their research.
  6. Do not seek validation on social media. Try to get in touch with people like Sai and present to them whatever you know.

If you are still not convinced that you can be useful to Sai, I present to you, this analogy.

Sri Ramachandra did not need the squirrel to carry tiny pebbles to construct the Ram Setu to reach Lanka. Yet, the squirrel, knowing very well that its contribution is no where close to the contribution of Hanumanji nor would the pebble be integral to the Setu’s stability, had not withdrawn from helping, as it is the cause that matters. Not the size.

P.S: Sai, if you get to read this, I would like to know the reason behind for what I have observed in the sixth observation.

Oppressed Jewish journalist Bari Weiss resigns from New York Times, claims discrimination

The Axiom
-
0
Oppressed Jewish journalist Bari Weiss resigns from New York Times, claims discrimination

Apparently the New York Times is not limited to anti-Conservative, Hinduphobic and India Bashing, another “jewel in the crown” is being an anti-Semite supporter and a Jewish hater!

New York Times Opinion Editor Bari Weiss announced her resignation on Tuesday 7/14/2020, denouncing the newspaper’s workplace culture as “hostile” for staffers who hold anything other than far left and twitter-verse ideologies.

In her resignation letter Weiss alleged the Times do not understand fellow Americans who have a difference of opinion, she mentions “the lessons that ought to have followed the election—lessons about the importance of understanding other Americans, the necessity of resisting tribalism, and the centrality of the free exchange of ideas to a democratic society—have not been learned. Instead, a new consensus has emerged in the press, but perhaps especially at this paper:”

She also writes “Twitter is not on the masthead of The New York Times. But Twitter has become its ultimate editor. As the ethics and mores of that platform have become those of the paper” The letter also states “Stories are chosen and told in a way to satisfy the narrowest of audiences, rather than to allow a curious public to read about the world and then draw their own conclusions.”

Journalism is about diverse opinions and free speech. However, The Times has become a platform of peddling predetermined narratives; proved by Weiss’ points, as she states “I was always taught that journalists were charged with writing the first rough draft of history. Now, history itself is one more ephemeral thing molded to fit the needs of a predetermined narrative.”

Weiss accuses her colleagues at the New York Times of bullying her for her Pro-Jewish views and anyone supporting her were given a cold shoulder. As per Weiss “My own forays into Wrongthink have made me the subject of constant bullying by colleagues who disagree with my views. They have called me a Nazi and a racist; I have learned to brush off comments about how I’m ‘writing about the Jews again.’ Several colleagues perceived to be friendly with me were badgered by coworkers.”

Times support for anti-Semites was further exposed by Weiss as she claims “there is still none appended to Cheryl Strayed’s fawning interview with the writer Alice Walker, a proud anti-Semite who believes in lizard Illuminati.”

All these details strongly support and prove the Times, which camouflaged as “liberal” but apparently is an anti-Semitic, as well.

Weiss has charged the Times and co-workers with discriminating and attacking her for having a difference of opinion with no action taken against these employees by claiming “New York Times employees publicly smear me as a liar and a bigot on Twitter with no fear that harassing me will be met with appropriate action. They never are. There are terms for all of this: unlawful discrimination, hostile work environment, and constructive discharge. I’m no legal expert. But I know that this is wrong.”

New York Times is a biased and one-sided platform with no space for the difference of opinion expresses Weiss by saying “What rules that remain at The Times are applied with extreme selectivity. If a person’s ideology is in keeping with the new orthodoxy, they and their work remain unscrutinized” and also “Online venom is excused so long as it is directed at the proper targets. Op-eds that would have easily been published just two years ago would now get an editor or a writer in serious trouble, if not fired.”

Times dictatorial supremacist model does not stop here. They run their authoritarian “media” platform by forced brainwashing of the youth could perhaps be seen in Weiss’s resignation letter in which emphasizes on the fact by stating the rules of young writers and editors have to follow The Times Rules “Rule One: Speak your mind at your own peril. Rule Two: Never risk commissioning a story that goes against the narrative. Rule Three: Never believe an editor or publisher who urges you to go against the grain.”

Weiss also adds “For these young writers and editors, there is one consolation. As places like The Times and other once-great journalistic institutions betray their standards and lose sight of their principles.”

This is the prime example of how “the liberal” media platform is run which hypocritically blames the difference of opinions as authoritarian and fascist. There are several honest journalists whose careers are targeted and destroyed in a similar fashion just for having a difference of opinion and religious belief.

If the New York Times could viciously attract a Jewish Journalist in a remorseless fashion, in a multi-cultured Jewish hub like New York City, we cannot even imagine what would this chronic Hindu bashing, India-Hating “newspaper,” like the New York Times do to a proud Hindu Journalist!

Please follow @Induslens on Twitter!

Digital veins over traditional veins

madhurisaisree
-
0
Digital veins over traditional veins

Hey, come on, let’s take a snap. SNAP, it is the common word in these days. When we hear this word, our brains, which are already enough equipped and accustomed to this word, start their reflexes. Our chapped lips pave their way to reach cheekbones, and eyes wrinkles curls themselves. That look freezes for milliseconds. These milliseconds worth zilch in this world, but the hippocampus subconscious world, they are enough to fire neurons and generate a chemical blip called thought.

Say cheese moment may last for milliseconds, but the ramifications produced in the abstract subconscious world can be ever last. What are those ramification’s thoughts? What can mere snap trigger? It’s just a snap. That snap embarks its cruise in the digital world. Now, we are living in the digital age, and it’s by far the best age. Old stone age never thought of this digital age, but the digital age itself showed how the stone age seems like to metropolitan evolvers. This digital age is the repository of the past, present, and future.

This soaring digital world makes everything obsolete and quaint. In this digital age, everything is public, and everything is in reach. We can understand it and yet hazy. It’s a nebulous world. It gives birth to many pigeonholes, as well as busts myths. This phantasm realm pokes its nose into many features of this real-world and puts its mirage screen to best use. This shapes the real-world sensibilities and continuously abrase and alter human emotions such as love, envy, disparagement, discouragement, motivation, inspiration, provocation, and compassion.

The digital age has negative effects as much as it has positive effects. Positive always exists in tandem with negative. As feelings are mostly ambivalent, so are our thoughts. These mixed thoughts can render a fair amount of positive and negative influences. In this era, three-year kids want to swap their veins with digital ones. We have been replenishing ourselves with lithium salt electrolytes for ages. We prefer RF radiation to carbohydrates. Digitization is pervasive and merged with our traditional veins. Our lives are so much so entangled and entrenched with this intricate internet. We read we learn; we feel, we pine for; we love, we disdain; we live, we dwell; we groove, we loosen up, and resides for eternal in this clumsy cluttered net.

Many people achieved their goals on this internet. Indeed, this internet has shed much light on dark lives, but how is our mediocrity adolescence going to use this light? It is the grappling question. We have heard about many teens maiden startups on the internet and meting out jobs, and accomplishing their future via the internet. We also heard about many teens are skewing towards surgical treatments so that they look perfect in their digital pandora box, commonly called a selfie gallery.

Everyone thinks this Hazy world is perfect. Spick and span in every aspect. We can paint our chapped and pale lips to plumpish red, and we can erase our zits on our face in the nebulous world. This real-world is incompetent to erase the zit caused by the hazy world on this mediocrity naive brains. In this hazy world, everything seems possible and shows the perfect tale of ourselves.we have the liberty to add the same filters as our celebrated people, and we can have total similar lavish benefits. Every person possesses a picture-perfect life. When we come out of that hazy world, we cannot stand ourselves in this real world. We are not ready to embrace our flaws and inadequacies in this real world. This causing great stress on naive brains.

This hazy world subdues the real world. It formed new statutes of life and beauty. It fashions a child’s mind and renders him apathy. Their brains start running from this fashioned stereotypes and try to elude them at every stage, but this capacious nebulous mesh never allows them, because it has already entangled with our veins. This produces mental depression. We project our emotions in the real world, and we think we are not good enough for this world. Iciness freezes in our eyes and we start fizzling. We detach ourselves from loved ones. We never understand the real world works on hope, love, belief, and leap of faith, not on authentic codes or step verifications.

Is it worth feeling stressed for a hazy thing? I asked this question myself and asking every mediocrity naive brain. Love the world we live in and cherish the moments in real life. Believe in yourself, Everything is possible. Pave your way to change the nope to yep.

Inside story of IISc: Penetration of anti-national ideology

Mathematician
-
0
Inside story of IISc: Penetration of anti-national ideology

Life is usually cool at the Indian Institute of Science Bangalore. You have the freedom to work anytime in the day or night, gossiping with friends while having tea in the cafeteria, playing sports and much more than that. There is no doubt that IISc has been a place of India’s best brains. However, that does not mean all the people here are sane. Specifically, our department (Department of Physics) is becoming the Madarsa of communists or so-called liberals whose foremost priority is to demean Indian culture; the second priority is to do the research which is also not up to the mark. I will sometime write a different article on how most Indian researchers in the institutes like IISc, IISERs and IITs are fooling the govt to get the funding and wasting the taxpayers’ money.

Coming back to the main topic, at IISc, many professors and the students influenced by them are fanatic communists, few others are not politically aware enough to understand the Lal-salaam propaganda and become blind supporters of them. The fanatics of IISc are not very different from the religious fanatics as, although they do not physically attack others, their mental attack is much cruel. They leave no stone unturned to mock Indian culture. I remember an incident when a meeting regarding Open Day was held in our department and a professor makes a Gaumutra jibe. I want to ask them a simple question; can they crack “72 hoors” jokes or camel urine jokes or Lal-salaam jokes? It is very common nowadays in our department that, while having tea in the cafeteria with a group of colleagues, someone will tell an unfunny Gaumutra joke or Ganesha joke and others will enjoy it like a mentally sick person. I many times felt like committing suicide because of this mental harassment done by these so-called intellectuals.

They never protest against religion-based reservations in many states and universities in India but they were so excited to protest against CAA and non-existing NRC. However, their slogans like “Manuvad Se Azadi” made many students think because not even 20% of Indians know about Manu and Manusmriti. Again it is their hypocrisy that they never say “Islam Se Azadi”. However, you can find many derogatory verses against non-Muslims and women in Quran. They will make fun of Pushpak Viman but they will not utter a single word against the flat earth theory in Christianity. In fact, these very liberals make fun of Indians when they go to other counties. They even welcome the scientists like Uriel Frisch who is a misogynist and openly passes outrageous comments against India.

Zakir Naik is no threat to them but they have a problem with Sri Sri Ravishankar, despite that Sri Sri is a secular dharma guru (please see the video) and Zakir naik provokes Muslims against Hindus (please see the video). They were beating chest when anti-Dalit article 370 was abolished but never bothered about the real minority of Kashmir. Basically, they are not concern about the dogmas or superstition in our society, their main problem is with the Indian culture. I was more angered (definitely not surprised) when no one opposed the decision of IISc offering the Satish Dhawan scientist chair to Ramchandra Guha who has got to do nothing with science or technology. Guha is a so-called liberal who wrote a book on Mahatma Gandhi but at the same time, he flaunts eating cow. Director of IISc, as well as the HRD ministry, should clarify how a historian can become a scientist in an eminent institute.

They have started another business: if any political issue happens, they will write an open letter to the govt which looks like “We are a group of scientists…. We immediately demand … blah blah..”. I mean so what if you are scientists? Do you want special rights just because you are a scientist? Do you think that govt should listen to your Shit just because you are a scientist? I am so happy that govt does not give a damn to these hollow people who did not write even a one-line letter against the Dalit atrocity happening in Mewat district of Haryana. I would encourage the readers to read the report titled These nine incidents since 2017 of rapes, abductions and forced conversions of Hindus characterises Haryana’s Mewat as “Mini-Pakistan” to know why they are not at all interested in the Mewat case.

Now they have started boycotting independence day celebrations. No, I am not exaggerating. Last year, not a single professor of ICTS attended a flag hoisting ceremony on Aug 15. This is how they are respecting the supreme sacrifice of Bhagat Singh, Chandra Shekhar Azad and many other freedom fighters.

I have many friends in IISc who do not like all this rubbish but they have to keep quiet as they are super-minority here. Also, if they will speak out, they might have to face the problem while applying for jobs. One should remember that career of a researcher is totally in his supervisor’s hand.

I feel that situation is the same in IITs as well as in other eminent science institutes in India. And the summary of this write-up is, like humanities departments, science departments also have been hijacked by these so-called liberals whose solo propaganda to destroy the Indian culture. I hope the scientific community in India accept their hypocrisy rather than painting people like me as a Sanghi or Bhakt.

PS: I have changed the name of my institute for the privacy purpose.

1...348349350...889Page 349 of 889