Home Blog Page 276

Justin Trudeau’s unwarranted support to Farmers protests, was made on behest of Khalistani secessionists?

Kiran
-
0
Justin Trudeau’s unwarranted support to Farmers protests, was made on behest of Khalistani secessionists?

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau greeted Canadian Punjabi community on Guru Nanak Jayanti and as well expressed concerns with the ongoing Snafu with the Farmers protests in India saying Canada will be with the Farmers. Breaking all the diplomatic protocols and relationships, a Foreign Prime Minister meddling into the Indian Affairs was regarded by the Indian Government as apprehensive and hit back Canadian Prime Minister Ill-informed and unwarranted.

One has to wonder why Canadian Prime Minister has to make these unwarranted statements and the underlying aspect is, his coalition government is hanging with the support of the New Democratic Party which is a socialist far left political party and its leader is none other than Khalistani supporter Jagmeet Singh Dhaliwal. Prime Minister Trudeau’s 2018 visit to India was marred with controversy for inviting a noted convicted Khalistani terrorist Japal Atwal for the dinner reception. Indian Government raised objections for this event. His eight day trip was more of appeasing Punjabi community for garnering votes than the objectives of bilateral discussions.

Overall, It was a disaster 8 day trip with a cold shoulder snub by Indian authorities. On the contrary, For his support to farmers, Trudeau raised the MSP for five pulses in the World Trade Organization. While it is interesting to observe that Canadian Farmers are free to sell their produce to any company or business of their choice, the same liberty, he doesn’t want for Indian farmers.

Justin Trudeau’s Labor Party lost the majority in the Oct 2019 election and formed a coalition government with the only natural ally New Democratic party (NDP) and won the trust vote in the parliament making it a far left liberal socialist government. Interestingly, the leader of NDP is Jagmeet Singh Dhaliwal who is a member of parliament in the House of Commons. He was born to immigrant Indian Parents. He was involved in numerous fundraiser events for Pro Khalistan activities aimed to malign India’s image. Not limited to this but his involvement in the Pro Khalistan rally in San Francisco USA in 2015 and as well supported the terrorist Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale. However, Mr. Dhaliwal was denied an India visa in 2013 by the then UPA Government for his Anti India activities abroad. Apart from that his vocal support for a separate Khalistan and openly declared he will attend all the separatist events of Khalistan. Mr.Jagmeet Singh Dhaliwal was expelled for a day from the House of Commons for his erratic comment at his fellow Bloc Party Member as Racist. Taking advantage of the ongoing farmers protest, his party members have openly supported the farmers’ protests on the lines of Khalistan agenda.

The Separatist movement in Canada has snowballed recently to declare a referendum 2020 by Sikhs for justice. Sikhs for Justice is a secessionist organization headquartered in NewYork and supported both Joe Biden for Presidency and as well Canadian Government. In fact, Sikhs for Justice offered a 1Million Dollar financial support for the ongoing Farmers protest in Delhi. Although Sikhs for Justice was banned by Indian Government in 2019, for alleged Anti India activities, its sister organization “ Organization for Minorities of India” (OFMI) is an active organization which is under watch by Indian Intelligence for its anti India activities and as well its founderBhajan Singh Bhinder was was the subject of an undercover US customs red handedly caught with purchasing of C-4 plastic explosives, M-16s, AK-47s, grenade and rocket launchers, and Stinger missiles in support of the Khalistan terrorist movement in India. 

The ongoing farmers protests in India witnessed several Khalistani secessionist members like Deep Singh who is an actor openly supporting terrorist Bhindranwale and glorifying him in the name of farmers protest is an eye opener for Indian Government and millions of Indians are waiting to see the response from Punjab Chief Minister Capt.Amarinder Singh’s response on  Trudeau Statement and the rampant secessionist movement in Punjab. Apparently, Congress Party and in specific Gandhi dynasty remained silent on Secessionists who once crushed the Khalistan movement with iron fist.

BJP and the need for the saffron party to win GHMC

pandeyjispeaks
-
0
BJP and the need for the saffron party to win GHMC

Ever wondered, why a party with just two seats in 1984 got a thumping majority in 2014 and even a greater victory in 2019? And that too a party that has kept Hindu cause in mind from its inception? A country which has been ruled for more than 800 years by Islamic invaders, 200 years by British and 70 years by the people of the colonial mindset gave a mandate to BJP which was unprecedented. 303 seats for BJP alone was not a joke and all the predictions of the so-called Political Pundits failed.

The psephologists had to recheck their degrees and the stereotypical election game changed forever. From the smallest election to the national elections, top leaders jumped in and we are seeing this now, in GHMC election. Now many, are making fun of this, that just to fight Owaisi brothers and the KCR, BJP had to put their full force in this election, but how many of us have realized the depth of this move by BJP? The demography of Hyderabad (Bhagyanagar) has always been dominated by Islamic culture and this is not now but from the times of invasion. It was the last geographical territory that got united with Bharat. The Nizam was not ready to merge and he deployed the Razakars to fight the government, but to fight this tyranical ruler, The iron man of Bharat, Sardar Patel made a move and thus got the Nizam to surrender.

But this surrender, didn’t change the demography much. The razakars later became the rulers of this and thus the anti- Hindu stance prevailed. The MIM party led by Assaduddin Owaisi was founded by Nawab Mahmood Nawaz Khan who once supported the idea of Pakistan, and even today the Owaisi brothers under the beautiful name of democracy and saving constitution are speaking the same language and they are spreading their tentacles one by one, very slowly in different parts of the country. Also, the Owaisi brothers have cleared their stance on CAA and NRC and have been helping the illegal Rohingya Muslims enter into our nation and that’s again because of the vote bank politics.

Now speaking of the Mayors of Hyderabad, from 1986 to 2002 the AIMIM had a clear dominance on this seat, this streak was broken by Telugu Desam Party and later again gained the prominence, in 2016 Bonthu Rammohan of TRS became the mayor of Hyderabad and because of this, the Rao Family run TRS has the heart of Telangana in their hand. 

Why is it necessary for BJP to win this election?

First things first, the demographic shift that will happen when BJP comes in power in Hyderabad will be tectonic, the MIM will lose their bastion and the spread of this Islamic virus by this party will get eradicated to from its core,at least for now! Second thing, the Hindus (51.3%) of Hyderabad will have a Political power and thus the demands will change from Islam centric to being Hindu centric which is good for Bharat’s demography overall and third thing, winning GHMC election,will be a gateway for BJP in the south and there is a heavy need for a party like BJP to get established in the south as we are seeing that Islam and Christianity is spreading with excessive speed as the days pas. Once,the dynastic party TRS and a core ISLAMIC party AIMIM loses the GHMC elections, there will be surely a surge of development. 

Why is BJP using its star players in a small election like GHMC?

Now, answer to this question is fairly answered in the above paragraphs, but again the face value of Yogi and Tejasvi Surya is far more than any leader in the country right now after Modiji and Amit Shah! Jagat Prakash Nadda’s decisive moves towards the growth of the BJP are turning out to be good as we have seen in the Bihar elections. The fiery speeches by Yogiji and Tejasvi are turning the tides of this election and it will be a great change for the Bhagywanagar if BJP comes in Power. Concluding the article I must say one thing, The BJP and its approach towards every election has changed the electoral game forever and Congress,once a party with clear dominance on every seat at every election,has been reduced to a third option party because of the reason well know! 

Love Jihad law- from the middle-class (not elitist) perspective

G Indira
-
0
Love Jihad law- from the middle-class (not elitist) perspective

The Uttar Pradesh Government’s Ordinance aimed at curbing forcible or fraudulent religious conversions including those for the sake of marriage, is a step-in the right direction. Since it has got the assent of State Governor Anandiben Patel, it has become law and has been published in the U.P. Gazette. After many parents complained about their daughters being married to convert religion, this law has been brought in. Colloquially, the inter-faith marriage between a Muslim boy and a Hindu girl is called ‘love-jihad’. This coinage is often ridiculed by the Liberals of India.

Love Jihad meant marriage only for the sake of religious conversion. It is a repulsive and abominable term for the Liberal elite class and liberal media too. To them, marriage is between two individuals out of free choice. Those two individuals are hassle- free and like free radicals they could float/flirt as they want to or as per their wishes, according to them. In their opinion, marriages- arranged between: a young man and woman is archaic and atavistic. The liberals have these western philosophies soaked in mind. They use the West-lens to see the East, which is a world that has a huge past civilizational history. However, in Indian society, family matters. The liberals view, most often, Indian parents to be illiberal, when it comes marriage of their children. Why would parents be, in the first place?

For instance, as a baby their son/daughter cries for a toy, parents buy. When sick, they worry and forgo sleep many days and nights to look after. Some women after attaining motherhood devote their time totally to look after their children, forgoing their personal goals and ambitions. As grown-ups, if their son/daughter wants to pursue higher education in their desired field, parents go out of their way to provide them wherewithal. This is how they bring-up their pesky children with patience all through. Most middle-class parents strive to fulfil their (parental) aspirations of reaching higher perches, through their children’s accomplishments.

At each step, parents try fulfilling their children’s wants, even if they are beyond their means. Unlike in the West, parents in India sacrifice their money, pleasure, time and other personal enjoyments to educate their children. Of course, as the saying goes: “Children sweeten Labour”, every middle-class parent thinks of their Labour, in their work sphere, to be sweet, as they do it for their children. For, most parents in India (barring the ones who work in government), their children are their pension in old age.

After having guarded so much, so wholesomely, if their grown-up son or daughter falls in love and would like to marry the person of their choice, parents think twice, whether the marriage is enduring. For, they are not sure whether it is love or impetuosity.  If it (the proposed marriage) comes with an inter-religious (specially between Hindu-Muslim) equation, they think not twice but hundred or thousand times. For, Hindus attach sanctity to marriage, whereas Muslims treat it as a civil-contract. These contractual marriages, the West approves, because it is free-society. In it, marriage is not binding. One can leave his/her spouse, as their marital-love recedes or love outside marriage blossoms. The couple there are always on tenterhooks. They are not certain of their marital-faith lasting forever. In India, the Hindu-code laws are stringent on divorce. From age immemorial, Hindus have a feeling that  marriage is a bondage, carried through many lives. Not of this life alone. In any case, as per the present time, these notions (nowadays) are loosened. Whatever be the case, the family system in India is still intact.

To parents, children are their assets. One may argue, a parent is a parent in any part of the world. True but culture in different parts of the world differs. Arranged marriages are in place, because Indian parents expect their children to concentrate on studies. They do not like distraction of love and girl-friends that mars the education. Parents do respect the feelings of their loved ones. Liberals all over the world are of the view that children when they are grown-up, should be liberated from the bounds of parents totally. For parents that groom the children right from birth, it is difficult. They know that they should not interfere or micro-manage children’s affairs, after being adults. However, when larger life-settling decisions like marriage is to be taken, parents do need to counsel them with their experience. Otherwise the mis-step, a son/daughter takes, makes them painful throughout their life.

Under the new law, which deals with different categories of offences, a marriage will be declared “null and void”, if the marriage of a woman is solely for the purpose of conversion (love jihad). There is nothing wrong in the law, as many parents are crying hoarse of these inter-faith marriages, that take away their daughter’s cultural roots. There is provision in the said law: If the woman wishes to change the religion after marriage, she needs to apply to the district magistrate. Hence, it doesn’t violate the Constitutional norm i.e. the freedom of religion.  Still in India, the two major religions: Hindus, Muslims— are living in silos. They are not bound by a Uniform Common Civil Code (UCC). The minority religions in India are guaranteed to propagate and proselytize. One of the dubious measures, is Love Jihad, says the Uttar Pradesh Government on the behest of their electorate.  Rightly, the Cabinet Minister and Spokesperson of the U.P. Govt., Siddharth Nath Singh said, “The way in which religious conversions are done using deceit, lies, force and dishonesty is heart-wrenching, and it was necessary to have a law in this regard.” The government is correct in making the law, as Government in India is generally formed by the poor and middle-class, it should represent their voice in enacting laws.

Overview of voting trends of Muslims in Bihar election 2020

Amar Bhujbal
-
0
Overview of voting trends of Muslims in Bihar election 2020

The results of the Legislative Assembly Election of Bihar were declared on November 12, 2020. After the numerical see-saw, which was continued through the day, Nitish Kumar-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) managed to win a total of 125 seats in the 243-member State Assembly. At the same time, the Mahagathbandhan or Grand Alliance gave it a tough competition and managed to win 110 seats. While the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) bagged 74 seats, the Indian National Congress (INC) got just 19 seats. However, this article focuses on winning candidates from average, significant and the majority Muslim population of various constituencies in Bihar.

The major religion in Bihar is Hinduism which is practiced by 82.7 % of the population. At the same time, Islam constitutes the second-largest religion in Bihar. According to the 2011 Indian census, 17,557,809 Muslims constituted 16.9 % population of the State and which is more than the average national population of the community. The Muslim population plays an important role in every Indian election, whether it is the National or State level. The following study explains the voting trend of the Muslim community in Bihar Elections.

Following are the election results of those constituencies where the Muslim population is more than 50 %. (Majority)

Table no 1

As per the above results (Table1), only Muslim candidates have won the election where the constituency has more than 50% Muslim population. In some constituencies, it is observed that the non-Muslim candidate secured second place due to split in Muslim votes. In Kishanganj constituency, due to Muslim votes split within two Muslim candidates, non-Muslim candidate Sweety Singh lost the election by only 0.8% fewer votes. It was the only Muslim-majority constituency where non-Muslim candidate had a chance to win the election due to a split in Muslim votes. If the AIMIM candidate had got more than 1% of the vote of the Congress candidate, then Sweety Singh could have won the election from Kishanganj, where the Muslim population is 60.57 %. By looking at the results of the above constituencies separately, it is also observed that the sum of the vote percentage of Muslim candidates received is almost equal to the percentage of Muslim population in respective constituencies.

Following are the election results of those constituencies where the Muslim population is ranges from 30% to 50 % (Significant)

Table no 2

According to the above results (Table 2), it is observed that all Muslim candidates secured the second position where the Muslim population ranges from 30% to 50%. The above results are also showing that in some constituencies, there is a minimal difference in the vote percentage of the winning and runner-up candidates. In Dhaka constituency, Pawan Kumar Jaiswal has defeated Faisal Rahman by only 3.1 % more vote. In Pranpur constituency, Nisha Singh has defeated Tauquir Alam by only 1.49 % more vote. It is also observed that the sum of the vote percentage of Muslim candidates received is equal to or more than the Muslim population percentage of respective constituencies.

Following are the election results of those constituencies where the Muslim population ranges from 15% to 30% (Significant)

Table no 3

Looking at the results (Table 3) of the above constituencies separately, the sum of the vote percentage of Muslim candidates is clearly more than the Muslim population percentage of respective constituencies. Out of these nine constituencies, Muslim candidates have won in five. This means that these five candidates have received Muslim as well as non-Muslim votes, although the constituency did not have a Muslim majority population.

Following are the election results of those constituencies where the Muslim population ranges from 0% to 15% (Average).

Table no 4

Looking at the results (Table 4) of the above six constituencies, it is seen that two Muslim candidates have won the election while four Muslim candidates have secured the second position although Muslim population is not significant. In Arrah constituency, Amarendra Pratap Singh defeated Kaumuddin by only 1.88 % more votes, though the Muslim population percentage is 10.97 %. Similarly, in Nathnagar constituency, Ali Ashraf Siddiqui defeated Lakshmi Kant Mandal by 3.97% more votes, though the constituency has a Muslim population just 9.17%. Here also, Muslim candidates have received Muslim as well as non-Muslim votes, although the constituency did not have a significant Muslim population.

Conclusion

Looking at the overall trend of Muslim voting, one can conclude that no non-Muslim candidate can win elections from constituencies where the Muslim population is more than 50%. One can also conclude that, at the time of voting, Muslim voters are giving priority to Muslim candidates first and then to the ideology of the political party. In four of ten constituencies where Muslim population is more than 50 %, Muslim voters have not voted those political parties who called themselves as secular. In these constituencies, Muslims voted All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen (AIMIM), which is the political party based on Islamic ideology. These results may encourage the remaining political parties to allow only Muslim candidates for every election if the Muslim percentage in the respective constituency is more than 50%.

At the same time, it has been observed that from the above overall data, non-Muslim communities are not giving priorities to the religion of the candidates at the time of vote like Muslims. The Muslim candidates have won the election from those constituencies where the Muslim population ranges from an average to significant. In eight of such 23 constituencies, Muslim candidates have won the election. The election result of Nathnagar constituency is one of such examples where Ali Ashraf Siddiqui got 40.41%, and Lakshmi Kant Mandak got 36.44 % vote although the Muslim population is just 9.17% in the constituency.

It has been also observed that in several constituencies, non-Muslim candidates have not got the vote at least equal to the per cent of the non-Muslim population of respective constituencies. Finally, by observing the overall data, one can conclude that non-Muslim votes are divided into Muslim and non-Muslim candidates while Muslim votes are only divided among Muslim candidates. May be due to such voting trend, the Muslim factor plays an important role in every Indian election.

References

https://results.eci.gov.in/

https://www.censusindia.co.in

Are the phrases “Brahmin left and Brahmin bailout”, a rhetoric of anti-semitism on Brahmin community?

Kiran
-
0
Are the phrases “Brahmin left and Brahmin bailout”, a rhetoric of anti-semitism on Brahmin community?

Progressives in United States often use the term Brahminism and Brahmin Left which they intend to convey the high intellectuals of the society. The term Brahmin Left is a new phrase being used by Progressive left to showcase Brahmin community of India. It is not new that Brahmins community is often dragged in western media to malign them in a derogatory way. However, far left progressives and progressive media fail to acknowledge few facts as mostly the media and progressive intellectuals are blind enough to acknowledge certain facts. Centrists often measure this kind of reporting as selective reporting or selective journalism which the main stream progressive media selectively take the points needed and ignore the rest of the reporting for any cooked articles to malign a character of a person or a community wholly.  

Thomas Piketty, a French Economist and a professor at London School of Economics coined the name Brahmin Left in his journals to showcase that Brahmins in India belongs to intellectual community. However, his knowledge on Brahmins in India fell short in both situation and as well selective ignorance to weigh the socio-economic factors of Brahmin community since ages. His journal narrates the shift of intellectuals from right to left in US, UK and France and compared intellectuals as Brahmin Left. One thing which his journal does not fits the narrative is that Brahmins in India from 1948 until 2017 saw a drastic down turn in social status. Brahmin community largely comprise of priests and a tiny fraction of priests evolved to study western studies during British India. Majority of priests belong to Brahmin community are currently living in poverty and not able to lead the livelihood. Interestingly, Mr. Piketty selectively ignored the fact that, things have evolved and every community and caste in India have every possibility to become educated intellectuals and Indian constitution guarantee that. By narrating and naming the Brahmin Left, his views on a specific community has been pin pointed out just like how Nazis tried to hunt down Jews during World war II.  

The twisting of words on Brahmin Community is not limited to just Mr. Piketty but the phrase Brahmin Left has been used by a contract Journalist Zaid Jilani of Virginia in his latest article published in Wall Street Journal (WSJ). He borrowed the term Brahmin Left and used it as Brahmin Bailout which many readers and netizens are terming it as obscene and provocative. His latest article “Cancelling Student Debt would be a Brahmin Bailout” talks about bailing out Student Debts is like Brahmin Bailout. He intends to showcase that the students who graduated are equated as intellectuals and simply implied the phrase “Brahmin Left” to Brahmin Bailout. While the entire article is about the prospective Biden’s administration priorities on student debts bail out, his reference of Brahmin bailout is un-timed and needless. His futile reference of the term Brahmin Bailout is simply a rhetoric of anti-Semitic and witch-hunting of a specific community. This reminds how Jews had to hide out for their safety during Nazi Era. The absurd phrase used as “Brahmin Bailout” is clearly undermining and shaming a specific community.  

As the western media with selective journalism negate the eastern religions and cultures in the name of Progressive ideology, a new extreme step to undermine the Hindu religion targeting a specific community selectively is currently a trending aspect. Much of the western public do not have an idea of the Brahmin community in India. As per census 2011 and the data available in 2014, the Brahmin community is merely 5% of 1.2 Billion population. Their livelihood is mostly priestly hood at temples and salary paid is merely $100 per month depending on location. It is true to the fact that the Hindu Priests in United States draw a maximum of $1200 per month by temple managements across United States. This makes them to claim under low-income group officially. Less than 1% of the Brahmin community could afford to eat two-time meal a day and able to graduate western education while the remaining Brahmin community is officially in below poverty line. Although, the progressive left claim that Brahmins imposed the ideology since thousands of years then one has to wonder how and why Hindu religion has become one of the most progressive religion that always evolve from time to time while the other religions like Islam and Christianity are still archaic and follow the book. Brahmanism is a colonial word that drew the attention during British India which it doesn’t have any significance in the modern era. As Supreme Court of India rightly given a judgement that conveys a message that Hinduism is not a religion but a way of life. People in India follow a tradition that was given to them by their ancestors and safeguarded the culture despite Persian aggression for 800 years and British occupancy for two centuries. 

PV Narasimha Rao: A Hindu face or a man of power? Some facts

indicwriter
-
0
PV Narasimha Rao: A Hindu face or a man of power? Some facts

I would first like to start on why Rao was chosen for the job in 1991. Forever Prime Minister in waiting for Shri Sharad Pawar has alleged in his book that Arjun Singh convinced Sonia Gandhi that Rao will be lame-duck Prime Minister & Rao will make way for Arjun Singh to be Cong’s head.


But Rao, didn’t step down from the position of the Party President and this started an internal tussle between then senior Congress leaders & they all formed regional parties. There are two reasons for it, one they were against Rao & 2nd they wanted to get minority votes to post 1992.


Now lets looks at Rao’s role in Barbie demolition, many say Rao was in favor of demolition & some Congress ppl allege that Rao could have saved the demolition by suspending the UP govt, some say he was happy with the demolition.
It’s all a lie, I will explain to you in detail.
PVNR was basically in a checkmate situation in 1992, where he had 2 options:

  1. He could have used the military against Ram Bhakts, where he feared the military will not fire on ppl chanting Jay Shree Ram
  2. Take strict action post demolition to pacify Mυzlims by taking action

He went for 2nd. Post demolition PVNR suspended the BJP government in HP, MP, Raj & UP. Now his plan B is activated where he is now trying hard to convince the minority that demolition perpetrators shall be punished by law. But damaged had been done, Hindus went closer to BJP & minorities moved away from Congress. Minority voters in UP went to Mulayam & in Bihar, it went to Laloo which made the M+Y combination possible, this permanently weakened the Cong & hence senior Congress leaders started calling PVNR BJP agents, Rao had no affinity towards Hindus, he became the scapegoat for a party.

Senior Congress leaders tried to convince Sonia Gandhi for an internal coup to occupy Rao’s chair, but that did not happen and hence they blamed PVNR for 1992 and moved away from Congress. Many Congress leaders openly supported PVNR, saying he is a truly secular leader and hence his secular credentials should not be questioned. In short, he was Congressi. Now we know why PVNR’s dead body was not brought to the Cong HQ, because PVNR is now an enemy in the eyes of Minority.

In an interview in 1993, PVNR said that he was committed to rebuilding the mosque and it will fulfill it at any cost. He never said anything in favor of Ram Mandir. He said BJP can’t win this battle legally, he was confident that the ruling will be in favor of the Mosque. But in 2019 the verdict came.

PVNR said that Advani had assured him that Mosque will not be touched and he said Advani betrayed him. Now to get back at Advani, PVNR put false Hawala charges on Advani in 1996, where Advani got acquitted in 1998. New BJP supporters aren’t aware of the torture which BJP leaders faced.

After Babri demolition, the 2nd most overrated claim is that PVNR is the original architect of the Nuclear Test and he convinced Vajpayee to complete the mission. This is just another lie, bear with me if this article gets little longer, but I will explain with details.

PVNR govt & his overrated economic reforms made them mercenary of US. Now conducting a nuclear test means they have to face economic sanctions which then the government was not willing to risk. This is literally a shame, how PM is going against national interest by not conducting test.

CIA meet Vajpayee in 1996 & they were convinced that Vajpayee was in favor of the Nuclear Test, hence in 1996, they stopped Vajpayee from getting power with the help of Congress. But finally, Vajpayee Ji became PM in 1998 and the test was sanctioned despite CIA pressure tactics. Vajpayee made it clear in 1998 that he is not afraid of economic sanctions, a country like India can’t be threatened with sanctions. Now compare his approach with PVNR. The US did put sanctions on us but that didn’t affect us at all, so Vajpayee’s stand was vindicated.

Now after the 1998 Pokhran Test, the US had to bring down the Vajpayee govt at any cost. They assigned this task to the trusted international agent Sυbramanian Swαmy & look who attended the tea party in 1999, was PVNR, which means he also played a part in bringing down Vajpayee govt in 99.
Now let’s look at PVNR’s involvement in scams. He was directly involved in the Harshad Mehta scam & he received a bribe. Jethmalani produced an audio cassette of the conversation to prove the charges against PVNR. We all know how Harshad Mehta died mysteriously & this scam was buried in a coffin.


PVNR was close to Godman Chandraswami who was a well-known international agent, well connected to the international lobby including the arms dealer. Chandraswami was arrested in 97 and his trusted friend Su Swαmy openly defended him. I will write a separate thread to expose SuSu and Chandraswami.

PVNR govt was saved in 1993 by the cash for vote scandal, where they bought MP’s to cross vote in the favor of the govt. Chandrashekar’s faction voted for PVNR again fixer Swαmy in action. Now you know why he has regards for Rao. Cong has so much love for democracy.

PVNR’s Kashmir Policy was also an utter failure, he never recognized Pandit exodus plus he wasn’t as ruthless on insurgency as today’s Modi Gov is. PVNR was often soft on the military action & often tried monkey balancing. Insurgency grew many folds under his regime, we paid the price.
PVNR’s Pakistan policy was also a big failure after Pak PM Ms. Bhutto declared open support to the insurgency in Kashmir, PVNR was still trying to talk to Pak using a diplomatic channel. Pak had the support of US & OIC where a resolution was made in UN against India, we somehow saved face.
Regarding the 1991 economics reforms & liberation from license raj, I have already burst those claims in my Manmohan Singh thread. I have attached the link where you will find the truth about the 1991 reforms. I have attached all relevant sources to it you can read it here.

These points are enough to tell PVNR was the man of the chair not the face of Hindus in Congress. Leaders like Vajpayee, Advani & Modi are often underrated by BJP supporters, and they give credits to other people.

The choices we have: Roots in our civilization

calyxoworks
-
0
The choices we have: Roots in our civilization

We keep moving. We think we are moving. But is it true? I think we are stationary and the universe presents two choices at a time to choose from and we keep choosing one and thus the universe progresses depending upon the collective outcome of all the choices of all conscious beings who can make choices in this universe.

The choices are also not in a simple fashion. they percolate down as in the form of a pyramid. The person with more consciousness has to make higher choices and the person with lower Consciousness has to make lower choices in order to sustain the civilizational flow which is in the form of lateral pyramid. 

At the micro level, each person has a range of choices from higher to lower one but the impact of the choices he makes is dependent upon the level of his consciousness. That means, a lower person must make decisions on higher choices also but the impact is very as compared to the choice made by a higher person on the same set of higher choices. Similarly, a higher person’s decision on lower choices is very low as compared to the lower person making a decision on the same set of lower choices. This leads us to the conclusion that each set of choice is important and each person is equally important. Thus the terminology of lower and higher is to differentiate the consciousness level and not anything else.this is what is called pyramidal structure of any civilization. This leads us to the varna system having 4 varnas_ brahmin, kshatriya, vaishya, shudra.

Brahmin_ one who is in direct connection to the universe through inner realization . 

Kshatriya _ one who is directly connected to remove obstacles in the path of people and himself . path leading to brahmin hood.

Vaishya _ one who is in direct connect to provide resources to people and himself on path leading to brahmin hood.

Shudra_ one who is in direct connect to provide services to people and himself on path leading to brahmin hood.

Thus we come to the conclusion that one who is born needs to develop into the beautiful perfect being. The perfect being who is in tune with the universe. One who knows. What? He knows that volcanoes erupt. He knows that rivers flood. He knows that animals exist. He knows that animals eat. He knows about anatomy of females and males. He knows about the purpose of civilization. He knows about the beautiful spacecraft. He knows about the sun. He knows about the existence of underwater creatures. And if he doesn’t know about external natural creations, he definitely knows himself.

Om Shanti Om 

भगवद गीता: कठिन समय की आवश्यकता

PANKAJ JAYSWAL
-
0
भगवद गीता: कठिन समय की आवश्यकता

वर्तमान समय में मानवता एक कठिन दौर से गुजर रही है, हर कोई न केवल वित्तीय मामलों से, बल्कि मन की शांति के लिए जूझ रहा है, जीवन इतना थका हारा क्यों हो गया है? आखिर जीवन का उद्देश्य क्या है? यह कठिन प्रश्न शारीरिक के साथ-साथ मानसिक स्वास्थ्य को भी बहुत प्रभावित कर रहा है। पूरी दुनिया अब भारत के आध्यात्मिक ज्ञान को आशान्वित भाव से देख रही है। हम भारतीय सामान्य रूप में, आमतौर पर हमारे प्राचीन ज्ञान को अधिक महत्व नहीं देते हैं, जो पश्चिमी देशों और कई अन्य देशों में गहराई से अंतर्दृष्टि प्राप्त करने और इस महान ज्ञान को ग्रहण करने के लिए प्रयास करते हैं, जो हमें हमारे प्राचीन ऋषियों ने आसानी से विरासत में दिया है।

विश्व को भगवद्गीता के रूप में भगवान श्रीकृष्ण द्वारा अर्जुन को दिए गए वास्तविक ज्ञान की ओर मुड़ने की आवश्यकता है। किसी भी स्तर, लिंग, जाति, पंथ, धर्म या रंग से प्रत्येक व्यक्ति अमीर या गरीब, बड़ा या छोटा, बुजुर्ग या किशोर सभी की समस्याओं का समाधान भगवद्गीता में मिलता हैं। हम इसे जीवन “प्रबंधन पुस्तक” के रूप में मान सकते हैं।

भगवद्गीता को मोटे तौर पर तीन खंडों में ज्ञान, कर्म और व्यवहार में विभाजित किया गया है। भगवद्गीता खोए हुए पथिक को रास्ता दिखाती है, सभी को यथोचित और योग्य उत्तर देती है। जब अर्जुन ने अपना आत्मविश्वास खो दिया था और उसका मन खिन्न हो गया था, उस समय भगवान कृष्ण ने उन्हें हमारी आत्मा की क्षणिक और शाश्वत उपस्थिति के बारे में ज्ञान दिया और कैसे धर्म, योग्य मार्ग, उचित कार्यों के साथ उत्थान के लिए प्रतिकूल परिस्थितियों में भी मन को स्थिर रखने और जो कुछ भी है उसका व्यापक दृष्टि से समाधान ढूंढ़ने के लिए कहा था। मन और उससे जुड़े आयाम हमारे जीवन में कभी न खत्म होने वाले कष्टों का मुख्य कारण हैं, अच्छे समय में भी, हम सच्चे अर्थों में खुश नहीं हैं। अंततः शारीरिक, मानसिक और सामाजिक स्तर पर कई समस्याओं से लड़ते रहते हैं। इन सभी मुद्दों के पीछे का सरल कारण हमें हमारे स्कूल जीवन या कॉलेज जीवन में इन आयामों के बारे में कभी नहीं सिखाया गया है। हमारे स्कूली दिनों से भगवद्गीता का यह अनमोल ज्ञान देना अत्यंत महत्वपूर्ण है। एक बार जब बच्चा अपने मन को शांत करना सीख जाता है, तो जाहिर है कि वह खुशी और मन की शांति के साथ किसी भी लक्ष्य / उद्देश्य को प्राप्त करेगा, तब हम इसे वास्तविक सफलता कह सकते हैं। भगवान कृष्ण ने योग साधना पर प्रमुखता से ध्यान दिया। निश्चित समय-अवधि में किया गया ध्यान अभ्यास हमारी क्षमता के बारे में स्पष्टता लाता है, तनाव को समाप्त करता है, अनावश्यक स्मृतियों को मिटा देता है और सर्वशक्तिमान के साथ हमारा संबंध स्थापित करता है।

भगवान कृष्ण ने कहा, विभिन्न कार्यों को करते हुए, इसे भगवान के कार्य को कर रहे है ऐसी भावना सदैव अपने मन में रखें और परिणाम के बारे में सोचें बिना कार्य को वरीयता दें ताकि कार्य अधिक गहराई और प्रभावी ढंग से हो सकें। जो कुछ भी आपके कार्यों का परिणाम होगा उसे विनम्रता से स्वीकार करें, सही समय आने पर आपको उसका फल मिलेगा। हम आज की दुनिया में विशेष रूप से युवाओं के साथ देख रहे हैं, हर क्रिया को सफलता या असफलता के पैमाने में देखा जाता है। अंत में आशा, अवसाद, आक्रामकता, उद्वीग्न मन सभी के लिए नकारात्मक वातावरण बनाने में कारणीभूत होता है। मन की शांति और आनंदपूर्ण तरीके से कार्यों को करने का तरीका जानने के लिए भगवद्गीता पढ़ें, ताकि हम भौतिक और आध्यात्मिक जीवन में भी धीरे-धीरे प्रगति करते रहें।

भगवान कृष्ण ने कहा, भगवान सर्वोच्च और सर्वव्यापी है। विपरीत परिस्थितियों के दौरान, आपके निकट और प्रियजन आपको छोड़ सकते हैं, फिर भी , मैं हमेशा आपके साथ रहूंगा। मैं आपसे बिना शर्त प्रेम करता रहूँगा। इसलिए, हर कार्य को प्रेम के साथ मेरी क्रिया के रूप में करें। तुम खाली हाथ आए थे और खाली हाथ जाओगे, इसलिए अपने अहंकार को संतुष्ट करने के लिए और काम-सुख के लिए किसी भी बुरे काम को न करें।

यदि हम जागरूकता के साथ देखें, तो भगवान ने हमेशा हमारी मदद की है, जब भी हमें इसकी सख्त आवश्यकता होती है, वह हमारी सहायता करता है। इसलिए ईश्वर पर विश्वास रखें और विश्वास और कृतज्ञता के साथ जीवन में आगे बढ़ें कि सर्वशक्तिमान ईश्वर हम पर प्रेम बरसा रहे हैं।

जब अधिकांश लोगों ने विश्वास खो दिया है और कोरोना संकट के कारण आशा है, हर किसी को हमारे महान ज्ञान पुस्तक “भगवद्गीता” की ओर अपना ध्यान केंद्रित करना होगा। यह हमारा कर्तव्य है कि हम इसे एक जन आंदोलन बनाकर सरकार और स्कूलों को अपने स्कूलों में अनिवार्य विषय बना सकें।

  • पंकज जगन्नाथ जयस्वाल
    लेखक, शिक्षाविद्, परामर्शदाता, एओएल फैकल्टी, इलेक्ट्रिकल इंजीनियर हैं।
    www.sharencare.in

Is it really farmers against Govt?

madvertease
-
0
Is it really farmers against Govt?

Numerous videos are being circulated on the social media where no words are left to boast of the charisma of war heroics of “Sikh”. Even in TV interviews they are in a way threatening the govt giving examples of ‘Sikh Warriors’.

As if farmers in Punjab were Sikhs only. And even if they were; why religious sentiments and emotions are raised by using religious slogans and threats. It seems the whole movement has been hijacked from farmer platform to the religious platform in an attempt to convert into religious protest sooner or later. The way all the time only one or two words are used to represent farmers rest of the dialogues are used to quote historical war events involving sikh warriors so as to threat the Govt as if it is the Sikhs vs Govt and not farmers vs Govt.

The popularly elected govt is being paralleled with moguls and Britishers. Where were these all Sikh warriors when 1984 mass massacre of Sikhs happened and when Golden Temple was attacked. Or the truth is that these all are just pawns dancing to the tunes of their commanders.

The opposition is playing a very dangerous game of fear and false narrative politics. First, an “experiment” was done on CAA. This time it is a “practical”. Far more planned and very cautiously executed and at very high level.

This time more anti national bodies are roped in to creep into the protest in the barge of religion so as to raise religious sentiments of the masses. The Govt should act now and take stern action against people who are raising religious slogans even if it has call in the army because sooner or later it is going to violence. The scavengers are waiting just for one instance or signal from the “High Commands” to turn this protest in to riots.

It is not the farmers who are against the bill but its their leaders and their commanders who are against it. Because this reform will banish their authority over the masses which is encashable commodity at the time of elections or events where they can bully the Govt. Same was reason in the case CAA and Triple Talaq and abrogation 370 etc.

The tragedy is this that poor farmers are used as shield. A sense of fear has been instilled in them so as to bring them to protests. False narratives are being spread by the congress and allies. The Kisan Union leaders are roped in to set the narratives as most of the farmers are illiterate and poor and they abide by the saying of their leaders.

The congress and its leaders are opposing this bill even though it has been formulated by its previous regimes in the past. The Modi Govt has only got it passed which was not happening because of vested interest of the Union leaders and the state politics. If this bill is implemented it will be major blow below the belt to the Kisan Union politics which play a major role in elections of the agriculture states especially in Punjab.

This is not the first time since Modi Govt into power that a reform is being opposed. Rather every reformed is opposed of which two only came to lime light that is CAA and now Farmer bill. The reason for this lime light is because here deprived and down trodden were involved on the fear of whom these political vultures has pried over the decades to remain in power and the same politics of fear and false narrative is being used to instigate to bring them to protests.

This really hurts how congress and allies are betraying the farmers by fanning these protests just to gain political mileage. If this protest go wrong it will leave a long lasting scar on the nation. Its time that Congress and allies should put stop to dirty politics.

१५ दिनों के अंदर चल बसे दो पूर्व महिला मोर्चा अध्यक्षा: ओड़िशा महिला मोर्चा ने दी श्रद्धांजलि

Debadatta Rath
-
0
१५ दिनों के अंदर चल बसे दो पूर्व महिला मोर्चा अध्यक्षा: ओड़िशा महिला मोर्चा ने दी श्रद्धांजलि

भुबनेस्वर: भाजपा के दो पूर्व महिला मोर्चा अध्यक्षों की १५ दिनों में मौत हो गई है। उनमें से एक मृदला सिन्हा हैं, जो भाजपा के महिला मोर्चा की पहली राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्षा थीं। वे केंद्रीय समाज कल्याण बोर्ड व मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय की पूर्व अध्यक्षा रह चुकी थीं। उन्होंने जय प्रकाश नारायण के नेतृत्व वाली ‘समग्र क्रांति में सक्रियता से भाग लिया था। मनोविज्ञान में स्नातकोत्तर करने के बाद बीएड की डिग्री हासिल की थी। २०१४ के आम चुनाव अभियान के दौरान, उन्होंने सफलता पूर्वक भाजपा महिला मोर्चा की राष्ट्रीय प्रभारी के रूप में कार्यभार संभाला। वह अपने जीवन में कभी भी कोई इलेक्सन नहीं लड़ी। मृदला सिन्हा एक लघु कथाकार के रूप में भी जानी जाती थीं। उन्हें भारतीय परंपराओं और सांस्कृतिक दृष्टिकोणों का गहरा ज्ञान था। मृदला विशेष रूप से महिलाओं के साथ मजबूत संबंध बनाने में सक्षम थी। सामाजिक कल्याण के प्रति उनकी गहरी रुचि और प्रतिबद्धता थी।

इसी तरह, भाजपा ने भी अपने अन्य एक पूर्व महिला मोर्चा राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्षा किरण माहेश्वरी को भी खो दिया है। किरण माहेश्वरी मंत्री, सांसद और विधायक रह चुकी हैं। ओड़िसा भाजपा महिला मोर्चा द्वारा राज्य कार्यालय में दो पूर्व राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्षों के निधन पर एक श्रधांजलि सभा का आयोजन की गई। इसमें प्रदेश अध्यक्ष समीर महांति के समेत पूर्व मंत्री और पूर्व महिला मोर्चा की राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्षा सूरमा पाढ़ी भाजपा प्रदेश उपाध्यक्षा प्रभाती परिड़ा, सुकेशी ओराम, अनीता शुभदर्शिनी, प्रदेश महिला मोर्चा की अध्यक्षा स्मृति पटनायक, भाजपा प्रदेश कार्यकारिणी सदस्या काननबाला पटनायक व मनस्मिता खूंटिआ के इलाबा डॉ: ऐश्वर्या बिश्वाल, रश्मिरेखा दास, कस्तूरी मिश्रा, सुजाता पाढ़ी, रश्ममयी पटनायक, शशिप्रभा रथ, मंदाकिनी पात्रा, सुबासिनी पृष्टि, संगीता दास और पूर्णिमा दास प्रमुख उपस्थित थीं। सूरमा पाढ़ी ने अतीत की याद ताजा करते हुए ओर अतीत को याद करते हुए भावुक हुई।

सूरमा पाढ़ी की भावनाओं की बात करते हुए, प्रभाती परिड़ा ने महिला मोर्चा को एक परिवार के सदृश बताया। बतादें कि इससे पहले, राज्य भाजपा ने दिवंगत नेत्रियोँ की याद में एक मौन प्रार्थना की थी। जिसमें भाजपा प्रदेश अध्यक्ष समीर महांती, प्रदेश उपाध्यक्षा प्रभाती परिडा, अनिता शुभदर्शिनी, प्रदेश महासचिव पृथ्वीराज हरिचंदन, गोलक महापात्र, डॉ: लेखाश्री सामंतसिंहार, प्रदेश सचिव अमर नायक, महिला मोर्चा प्रदेश अध्यक्षा स्मृति पटनायक, अनुसूचित जाति मोर्चा प्रदेश अध्यक्ष विभू प्रसाद तराई, यूबा मोर्चा प्रदेश अध्ययन इरासिष आचार्य, प्रमुख उपस्थित थे।

1...275276277...889Page 276 of 889