Home Blog Page 106

Assembly Polls 2023- Understanding Karnataka’s Unique Importance In Indian Politics

Five BJP ruled states will go to the polls within a year or so. Gujarat and HP would come up first by the end of this year- 2022. Tripura polls are slated for in the early 2023, MP in November 2023, while Karnataka would seek people’s mandate in May 2023. Presently, Gujarat is hogging the limelight. But Karnataka polls probably promise to offer a gruelling contest and have great strategic significance for a number of reasons.

We would try to understand the case of Karnataka polls in a series of two articles. This is the first. It examines the political landscape of the state in general and BJP’s (at present ruling the state) rise in particular and why the party should change the way it views the state. The second part discusses why BJP has not been able to achieve the levels of success it would wish to and what are the ways forward for it on the way to 2023 polls.

Compared to its strategic importance- geographical location, rich history and present day IT leadership- Karnataka has not been getting the importance it deserves in the national context. Poor condition of roads, sluggish implementation of metro rail, fast depleting underground water level, in the state capital may be cited as examples of indifference. Generally speaking the inability of the state to reach its potential can be attributed largely to the apathy of political leadership cutting across party lines. 

The Indian National Congress had won the first three assembly elections and ruled the state from 1956 to 1983 (January) but when a viable alternative came to them in 1983 the people chose Janata Party. But Janata Party’s performance too did not come up to people’s expectations and though the Congress returned to power in November 1989 there was a flux during the period from April 1989 to December 1994 during which the state went through Prez rule twice and witnessed 3 chief ministers from the same party i.e., Congress heading the government.

During the next ten years spanning over 1994-2004 the state was ruled by Congress and JD (S) for 5 years each in succession. The next 3 years following 2004 were a period of political churning marked by the rise of BJP in the state as a potential contender for power. Interestingly this was happening at a time when the BJP led by Vajpayee had lost its hold over the central government following 2004 general elections. The party succeeded in forming a coalition government with JD (S) in February 2006, but it lasted for less than 2 years allegedly for breach of understanding about CM’s post by it partner. The first BJP CM took oath in November 2007 but his government collapsed in 7 days due to squabble over power sharing. However, the party managed to win comfortable numbers in 2008 elections and it governed the state from May 2008 to May 2013. However, the party faced various challenges including allegations of corruption and had to appoint three chef ministers over its 5 years tenure.

The unhappiness of voters with the party’s performance reflected in 2013 poll verdict and Congress got yet another chance to rule the state for next 5 years. However, the results of the next assembly elections held in 2018 showed voters’ frustration with the Congress as well. The people did not give decisive majority to any party, though BJP managed to emerge as the single largest party. However, disregarding the spirit of the mandate the Congress formed a coalition government with the JD (S). That ministry fell in about an year’s time following largescale defection of Congress legislators to BJP whereupon the latter formed it ministry in July 2019 and it continues till date though there has been a change in the CM in July 2021.

A cursory glance at the elections results since 1956 as outlined above indicate a general state of unhappiness of people of the state about performance of various political parties and their yearnings for one whom they can bank upon on a sustainable basis and bringing the glory to the state it so richly deserves. It is for the parties to introspect where they are falling short and take corrective action.

Many analysts say that BJP has a natural ideological connect to majority population of the state. However, the polls results suggest BJP has to do a lot of hard work to get deeply anchored in the voters’ psyche.

The next assembly polls are due in May 2023 and that is re-igniting speculations about whom would the people vote for. While INC, after facing debacle in recent polls in 5 states and especially losing the state of Punjab is bound to go for all out fight, for the JDS it will be kind of a existential challenge. There would also be a fourth force in the form of AAP. With the halo of victory in the Punjab this newbie may try to deploy every strategy and trick at its command, to make a dent in this state before taking a plunge in the 2024 general election. It is certain to leverage issues like ‘eradication of corruption in public services’, ‘regularising unauthorised apartments’ and more such to get an immediate foothold in the state. On the whole, 2023 polls in the state are likely to be contested keenly. This article examines the prospect of BJP, the present ruling party’s returning to power and what would be the enabling conditions for that to happen!

Karnataka was the first state in the south of India to choose BJP in the seat of governance. Since then more than a decade has passed. Considering Karnataka’s strategic geographical position and cultural linkages with its neighbouring states, being in the seat of governance in this state should have helped BJP to extend its footprints in neighbouring southern states considerably. How?

Karnataka is almost at the centre of three southern states viz., TN to its east, Kerala to its south, and Telangana to its north. Plus, the rich legacy of Vijayanagar empire binds it culturally to Andhra Pradesh as well. Coming to the present era, Karnataka is undoubtedly the IT capital of the country and draws very large number of IT professionals from all across India, iin particular these southern states.

Despite all of these, BJP governance in this state does not seem to have produced a favourable demo effect in the neighbouring states in terms of performance. After serving a full term from 2008 to 2013, it failed to secure the repeat mandate in the next elections. Even in 2018 it was not able to secure a decisive majority despite the benefit of anti-incumbency working in its favour. That had made possible for Congress- JD(S) coalition to rule for nearly another 3 years till July 2019 when BJP regained power. But even this come-back could be attributed more to defections than original mandate. The party needs to be aware of this fact and try to convince people to give it a decisive mandate in May 2023 for the all-round development of the state.

Intuitively speaking, the satisfaction of people of Karnataka with the party’s governance record are also likely to give major boost to the party’s footprints in the neighbouring states, which will be a critical component of its overall countrywide expansion programme. These facts should compel BJP to self-introspect both at the central and state level and reinvent itself.

The next article suggests a blue-print for action keeping in mind the May 2023 polls in the state. Any party that implements these shall benefit the people of the state besides reaping rich political dividend for itself. It is easiest for BJP as the party has the unique advantage of the phenomenon of ‘double engine sarkar’

An open letter to the Prime Minister of India

0

Betrayal of Hindus since independence under the garb of secularism.

Ramnavmi violence… And the fallout There off.

Dear Prime minister Sir, 

Is it now a crime in India to chant Jai Sri Ram? Is it now a crime to celebrate Deepawali and other Hindu festivals? Is it a crime to take a procession on Ram Navmi?

It started from Karauli in Rajasthan during the Ramnavmi procession. The procession was attacked by the so-called minority community goons while the police looked the other way. The DIG Rajasthan gave foolish press statements on how provocative slogans were raised like..

“VANDE MATARAM, BHARAT MAATA KI JAI”. Which was the cause of the riot. As if Allah hu Akbar and Naara E Taqbeer were slogans for peace.

Similar attacks on processions happened across Pan India. Even the Azadi fame notorious JNU wasn’t a exception. The latest example is where #Khargone Madhya Pradesh a riot happened. It is a reminder of the exodus of Kashmiri Hindus, as people in #Khargone are migrating out of fear as they are threatened by the so-called minority community, where some of their houses/shops are burnt while the others are for sale.

It happens every year during Durga Puja in WB where Durga possessions are banned. Why is it that organisations like PFI, and SDPI not banned despite the NIA investigating them?

Role of PFI and more the reason to ban PFI

Take the case of WB and Kerala where Hindus, though they form the majority of the population, are living in fear. In WB where a minor girl is raped and CM Banerjee makes an insensitive comment “How do I know that it is a Rape?” Where just 4 days ago hundreds of homemade bombs were found! Law and order are missing on the instructions of TMC. Despite knowing that the TMC goons are hands in glove with the police the government is not sacked.

The AIMIM hate-monger leader Akbaruddin Owasi threatened the Hindus by making public hate speeches such as, “They are 100 Cr, we are 20 Cr, withdraw police for 15 minutes we will teach Hindus a lesson” is acquitted by the judiciary. Shame on the judiciary. If a Hindu abuses the prophet he is murdered. But when AIMIM leader openly abuses Hindu gods he goes scot-free. Why is he not arrested under PSA (Public Safety Act) or the National security Act?

https://youtu.be/iSo1TKyGlTM

The new definition of secularism is to condemn Hindus for celebrating Hindu festivals such as Dipawali, Durga Puja. As it is portrayed as creating disharmony amongst the minority community. But offering Namaz at public places, blocking main arterial roads and at times even the railway tracks is to be tolerated by everyone at the cost of inconvenience to the people.

To speak about a Hindu’s murder or setting his house on fire is a cardinal sin. Even the so called Secular Liberal media keeps mum. But same thing happens to a Muslim…. And all hell breaks loose.

This is what Sardar Patel said during the partition

How can a community which amounts to 20 Crs out of the 130 Cr of the total population of India be called a minority? India is a Secular nation. PERIOD. What kind of secularism is this where Hindu places of worship are under government control and the rest of the religious places of worship Viz mosques, churches, etc. are free of all state controls? What kind of secularism is this where Mullahs or Imams are given salary hikes to the tune of 15 thousand Rupees and a Hindu temple Pujari is devoid of the salary?

What kind of secularism is it that till 2018 Hajis were given subsidies for the travel to Mecca and a Hindu pilgrim for Amarnath or Chardham Yatra is shown a thumb?

Does the word secularism apply only against Hindus? Calling Jai Sri Ram is communal. But shouting Allah – Hu – Akbar and Naara – E – Taqbeer, a peaceful slogan. Branding Hindus as Hindu terror is Secular. But Calling a terrorist a terrorist is communal.

The question is where is India heading? It is a well-known fact that the rise in the Muslim population is directly proportionate to the Islamisation of a nation. Typical examples are Iran, Afghanistan, Egypt, Turkey, BD, Indonesia, etc. There is a rapid population explosion of Muslims in India. A systematic pogrom or a toolkit is active by making planned changes in the demography of states.

Kashmiri Hindus were forced to leave Kashmir and the exodus or their settlement happened in their own country. But there will be no place for Hindus to hide if the population explosion results in India becoming a Islamic Republic. 

32 years have passed but Kashmiri Hindu Pundits are yet to get justice for the genocides in the valley. They are yet to be heard and yet to be settled Back in their rightful homes. What is done during the last 7 years by the NDA government to give justice to the Kashmiri Hindus is unknown to the public. 

Mr. Prime Minister Sir, 

How is deporting Rohingyas or illegal Bangladeshi immigrants communal? Why is it that the judiciary and the so called seculars have a soft corner for them? But the same judiciary throws out the petition filed by the #KashmiriHindus to reopen the #KashmirGenocide by Muslims? And the reason offered by the judiciary was the cases were too old to probe. The apex court lites it’s candles at midnight to listen to a petition filed for mercy of a terrorist, but is insensitive to the plight of the #KashmirGenocide.Does giving justice in India corrode with each passing year?

Why do the Milord’s poke their noses in ever petty executive matters?
Isn’t it a joke that some years ago the SC banned liquor sales on highways! And some months on the judiciary made a U-turn and cancelled the judgment. Has the judiciary disrobed itself on such petty matters when laws were in place to control liquor shops and drunken driving ?

Mr. Prime Minister Sir. 

Do Hindus have any rights? Does their Aastha matter? Do we always have to live in fear? Muslim appeasement is going on since 1947 for vote bank politics. How long is it going to continue?

The time has come to think and act fast on these issues. States like WB and Kerala are on the verge of becoming Muslim majority States and sooner than later they will demand a separate statehood, how many more partitions are waiting to happen? 

Soon rest of the states will follow the same path. And in the end, there will be chaos, and the horrors of partition will be back to haunt us.

Mr. Prime Minister you have implemented many good reforms, you have come out with many good schemes From
Jan Dhan to Jan Suraksha…
Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana (PMJJBY)…
Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana (PMSBY)…and many more

Once upon a time, India had to keep gold as a security to get a loan, today you have turned the tables on the international community. Today Indians are looked upon with great respect. The Indian passport is now valued across the globe. For the first time in history, we have hit Pakistan deep inside their territory Balakot, for the first time India has given a bloody nose to China. India is now an economic and military power. It is all due to your hard work and the urge to do more for India.

Now the time has come for the reforms for Hindus like setting the temples free of government control, reform of history textbooks rewriting history, and getting out of the hangover of the false glorification of the Mughals.

Implement the most needed NRC, CAA, UCC, abolish waqf board law of 1913, 1995 & 2013

Today Hindus have great expectations from you. They are looking upon you with great expectations. For the first time in the history of India, a Prime Minister visits Kedarnath and sits in a cave in “Dhyan Mudra” in saffron Vastra, the first time he lays the foundation stone at Ayodhya Mandir and performs Puja. The first time he inaugurates the Kashi Vishwanath corridor… Hindus have raised their bars of expectations. People want more than a dozen Yogi Aditya Naath Ji’s to protect the interests and safety of all the people irrespective of their religions and casts. It is a living example of how Uttar Pradesh did not have a single riot during Ram Navmi and Gangster Mafia is behind bars. Criminals are surrendering on their own fearing encounters.

Woman as never before are feeling safe in Uttar Pradesh.
Sir we Hindus have a lot of expectations from you.
All the previous Prime ministers have failed us.
DO NOT FAIL US THIS TIME . ?

By Veteran – Abhi Athavale 

Liberals Attack Prime Minister Narendra Modi on his Navratri Fasting

0

As lemon prices soar across the country, detractors of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi have started attacking him on his Navratri fasting. Narendra Modi fasts during nine days of Chaitri as well as Ashwin Navratris during which he consumes only water or lemon water for 9 days.

Rahul Gandhi has questioned how Modi can afford to eat only lemons for 9 days when the common man cannot afford to buy a single lemon. In another speech he said “Modi is squeezing lemons for his nutrition whereas the whole country is feeling squeezed by rising lemon prices.”

Some liberals have compared Modi with the French Queen Marie Antoinette for luxuriously exclusively consuming only lemons without any concern for the country’s poor. Journalist Sagarika Ghose said the fact that Modi only consumes lemons for 9 days shows that he is not inclusive. Her journalist husband Rajdeep Sardesai added “I have korma in morning, shrikhand for lunch and Old Monk at night. The right to food and drink of my choice is a freedom which I cherish and am unwilling to cede.” Meanwhile, The New York Times has come up with a headline “India’s Modi’s Navratri fast of feasting only on lemons leaves a sour taste in the mouth.” Meanwhile The Ashutosh tweeted “Why is the Modi only eating lemons during Ramazan. Will the Modi answer.”

Aircraft in ancient Indian literature: Flights of fancy or lost leaps of science?

0

Ancient civilizations across the globe have had myths about deities – particularly sun gods – who crossed the sky in aerial chariots. We Indians, too, had legends about a godly race we considered hugely superior to our own in terms of power, longevity, and technology. These beings rode airborne vehicles, many of which were distinctive in the sense that – unlike similar vehicles in other countries’ myths – they were like aircraft or helicopters as we know them now, not pulled by or yoked to birds or animals; but, instead, self-moving. Indians were familiar with two such types of vehicles. One belonged to the Ashwins, and the other to the Maruts.

Many of us know of the Ashwins as a pair of twins said to be divine healers. What is less well known is that they also served as emergency rescue workers. The Rigveda is full of accounts of the Ashwins rescuing stranded or trapped people in dramatic ways; they then provided them with emergency care and immediate transport to a safe location. Bhujyu, who had been betrayed by his father, injured and tossed into the ocean from a ship, was in an utterly hopeless state; at least eight Rigvedic hymns recount his rescue by the Ashwin twins. One such account is from RV 1.116:

Yea, Aśvins, as a dead man leaves his riches, Tugra left Bhujyu in the cloud of waters.
Ye brought him back in animated vessels, traversing air, unwetted by the billows.
 RV 1.172 describes this in more detail:

Ye made for Tugra’s son amid the water-floods that animated ship with wings to fly withal,
Whereon with God-devoted mind ye brought him forth, and fled with easy flight from out the mighty surge.

(We are using Ralph Griffith’s translations of the Rigveda throughout this article.) They rescued at least one other prisoner who had been fettered and tossed into the sea – Rebha (RV 1.116, 1.117). The same verse (and many others) narrate how the Ashwins saved Atri, whom robbers had thrown into a deep pit in an inaccessible mountain crevice. The Ashwins gave him instant nourishment, and carried him to safety. They also rescued Saptavadhri, who had been trapped alone under a giant tree trunk (RV 5.78). Many verses also narrate how they saved Vandana from a mountain pit.

When the sage Gotama got lost in a desert and nearly died from thirst, the Ashwins came to his aid (RV 1.116). While these are only some of the Ashwins’ many errands of mercy, we see that they often required access to difficult terrain – seas, deep forests, mountains, and deserts. Ordinary vehicles would have found these difficult to traverse, which might explain why the Ashwins tended to use airborne cars for these missions, even though they did possess other vehicles (like horse-drawn chariots). Interestingly, some verses refer explicitly to the fact that the Ashwins’ “car” is not drawn by horses. RV 1.120 says

I have obtained the horseless car of Aśvins rich in sacrifice,
And I am well content therewith.

RV 1.112 also mentions the car being horseless. In addition, there are plenty of verses describing the Ashwins’ vehicle as having three seats, three wheels, and space for food and mead which were presumably both for the pilots and their rescued passengers.

The reason that Indians became familiar with the aerial vehicles of the Ashwins was because of the frequent interaction that the Ashwins had with them during their rescue missions. We now come to the second type of self-propelled flying vehicles that Indians were aware of – those belonging to the Maruts. The Maruts were a group of 49 storm gods. They were a band of .brothers who practised polyandry – they had a common wife, Rodasi. As the Maruts’ main function was to cause storms, they did most of their work while airborne, but needed a flying vehicle to carry their wife with them.

The story behind how the Indians became acquainted with the Maruts’ vehicles is an unusual one. Unlike the Ashwins, the Maruts did not have frequent direct interactions with Indians. But their wife, Rodasi, bore a daughter named Mamata who married into an Indian clan – the famous priestly family of the Brihaspatis (she married Utathya, a brother of Brihaspati). Due to very unfortunate circumstances (the details of which one can refer to in the Matsya Purana), one of Mamata’s children – Bharadwaja – was not accepted by his parents.

However, he was not abandoned. He found a loving home with his maternal grandparents, the Maruts, and Rodasi. You will recall that Rodasi owned a flying vehicle. As a member of this family, Bharadwaja received intimate knowledge of flight and flying vehicles. Eventually he became a famous sage, and his family contributed in a major way to one of the “family books” in the Rigveda. The knowledge of flight vehicles that he inherited from his maternal grandparents might possibly have had repercussions far into the future, in nineteenth century India. But more of that later.

RV 6.66 describes the Maruts’ vehicle, highlighting the fact that it is not borne by an animal:

No team of goats shall draw your car, O Maruts, no horse no charioteer be he who drives it.
Halting not, reinless, through the air it travels, speeding alone its paths through earth and heaven.

RV 1.64 similarly describes the Maruts’ aerial chariot as being “self-moving”.

The next mention of aerial vehicles occurs in the Ramayana. By this time, such vehicles are not being used exclusively by deities. The Pushpak “viman” of the Ramayana belongs to Ravana, and is maintained by Maya Danava, neither of whom are gods. It could be used for journeys across an ocean – Ravan used it to abduct Sita and carry her to Lanka, while Ram used it to fly himself and Sita home after defeating Ravan in Lanka. But it could also be used while fighting with an opponent who was also in the air, as in Ravan’s battle with the vulture Jatayu, who was flying at him repeatedly to prevent him from kidnapping Sita.

Maya Danava represents a key link in process of the technology of flight passing on from gods to Indians. An Indian himself, he was celebrated for his superb architectural and engineering skills. Ancient kings hired him to construct marvels like palaces with devices that cast optical illusions (as the Pandavas did in the Mahabharata, when they commissioned him to build them a marvelous palace at Indraprastha). Maya was also Ravan’s father-in-law, so when Ravan requested him to take charge of and maintain the Pushpak chariot, Maya was happy to oblige. In the process of taking care of the aerial vehicle, Maya figured out how to build flying vehicles himself. Although the demand for such exotic and expensive vehicles could not have been high, he did occasionally receive commissions for flying vehicles. A client of his was from the time of the Mahabharata – King Saalva – who wanted a flying metal “fortress” to launch an aerial attack on Dwaraka, the capital of Krishna.

The fierce aerial battle that followed is narrated in detail in chapters 76 and 77 of canto 10 of the Bhagawat Purana. Saalva and his soldiers bombed Dwaraka from the air, while securely ensconsed within the iron flying fortress designed by Maya Danava. They destroyed its towers, parks, recreational areas, and palaces. It could easily evade the Yadus’ weapons. As if by magic, it appeared low in the sky at one moment, perched on a mountain top or hovered near the sea at another, and landed on the ground at yet another moment. Finally, Krishna managed to hurl a club at Saalva’s helicopter and hit it. It then crashed into the sea and shattered, after which the battle finally ended with Krishna killing Saalva. Strikingly, no other country’s ancient literature seems to contain any mention of similar “air raids” or bombings by air.

Maya Danava followed tradition by passing on his specialized knowledge of aircraft to his children – in his case, daughters. These daughters are mentioned in the Brihatkatha, a first century BC collection of tales originally written in Paisachi (a now forgotten language). The Brihatkatha was later translated into Sanskrit and exists in two Sanskrit versions, the Brihatkathamanjari and the Kathasaritasagara. These feature, as side characters, two daughters of Maya who lived in central India (roughly in the area corresponding to Ujjayini and the Vindhya mountains). They knew how to operate small planes, capable of carrying two to three people. In fact, they regularly used such planes for joyrides. One of Maya’s daughters used it to give rides to her friend, a princess, and to visit her sister, who lived in a rather remote and inaccessible spot in the Vindhya range.

Other characters in the Brihatkatha either ride in or design flying vehicles. King Udayan, a king of Vatsa (another central Indian kingdom, corresponding to modern Khajuraho), did not own an aerial vehicle. But he wanted to commission one when his pregnant wife, Queen Vasavadatta, wanted to ride in a plane. Udayan searched far and wide for mechanics or carpenters capable of building a plane. However, every artisan he met denied that he could make such planes. Ultimately, he did find an Indian carpenter who constructed a small plane for him and his wife. The carpenter told him that though some Indian artisans actually did know how to make planes, they always hid their knowledge for fear of being captured by hostile kings and also of being forced to make war machines. Udayan and Vasavadatta, luckily, used their helicopter for a more pleasant purpose, being content with paying a flying visit to Vasavadatta’s parents in Avanti.

Some carpenters who featured in individual stories in the Brihatkatha were able to make flying vehicles that carried a few people and that fly using the principle of compressed air. However, they usually went to great pains to keep their knowledge secret, though they sometimes used it for personal ends. They were afraid of being exploited by enemy kings. This was not an unreasonable or imaginary fear. History is replete with incidents of invading kings capturing particularly talented people (for instance, the Kushan emperor Kanishka is known to have captured the physician Charaka at Takshashila, as well as the Buddhist scholar Ashvaghosha, while a Hun ruler of Kashmir had kidnapped the eighth century Sanskrit playwright Bhavabhuti from Kannauj). Besides the fear of being exploited and used for evil ends, there was the danger of being forcibly compelled to give up trade secrets, particularly as intellectual property rights’ protection was non-existent. The only solution to this problem was to keep this knowledge restricted to a very few individuals, perhaps a family which was officially engaged in some other occupation. For instance, an obscure branch of potters secretly passed on the knowledge of how to perform plastic surgery operations, pioneered by Susruta and only rediscovered in 1793 by English surgeons who saw a potter performing such an operation and instantly publicized it in The Gentlemen’s Magazine.

There are numerous other mentions of aircraft in our ancient literature. By now, it must be clear that our literature abounds in descriptions of cars that fly through the air, and are not powered by animals or birds. Equally, such vehicles have been mentioned rarely, if at all, in the ancient literature of other countries. Moreover, in our stories, knowledge of flying vehicles passed gradually from deities to humans. (While Greek literature mentions Daedalus and Icarus, they focused on attaching wings to their own bodies and flying; they did not use vehicles. In our literature, however, there was a focus on flying vehicles capable of carrying other passengers and provisions. )How likely is it that in the whole world, only the Indian imagination was preoccupied with thoughts of self-propelled flying machines? Since literature mirrors real life, could it actually be because we were familiar with such things?

To evaluate this, we come to documented evidence of actual attempts to build flying machines, in the polymath king Bhoja’s book, the Samaranganasutradhara. Bhoja was a major historical figure, an eleventh century king who reigned from 1010 to 1055. While his kingdom had its centre in Malwa, in central India, with its capital at Dharanagara (modern Dhar), it extended over a wide geographical region, from the Sabarmati river in the west to Vidisha in the east, and from Chittor in the north to the upper Konkan in the south. He was celebrated as a scholar king, and was equally well known for his practical projects – such as building dams – and his educational ones – he sponsored universities and encouraged education among his subjects to such an extent that even weavers in his kingdom were familiar with Sanskrit poetic metre. He was a patron of learning, and was himself a prolific author.Chapter 31 of the Samaranganasutradhara (which in general is about mechanical inventions and architecture) focuses on Bhoja’s and his engineers’ attempts to build flightworthy vehicles. According to the book, these machines were built of light wood, were bird-shaped, and were powered by boiling vats of liquid mercury. At first glance, mercury seems to be a very unlikely source of power. Current investigations, however, are showing it to be quite feasible. NASA used mercury in its engines in its SERT mission tests in the 1960s. They were using ion engines where powerful magnets in the spacecraft pushed away charged particles at high speed, generating thrust to power the craft. When mercury was used as the fuel instead of krypton or xenon, which are lighter, it could generate a stronger thrust because of its greater weight. In 2018, a space startup named Apollo Fusion was planning to use mercury to fuel high-power, low-cost rocket engines. Other fuels are, however, considered to have fewer environmental risks. In his manual, Bhoja does not discuss all the technical details, in the interests of safeguarding the intellectual property rights of the mechanics who actually built these vehicles.

If we could actually use flying machines, then an immediate question arises – why didn’t we keep flying all through this time? Why did we have to wait for the Wright brothers? As economist Ashok Sanjay Guha explains in his book, “Reversals of Fortune: Why the Hierarchy of Nations So Often Turns Topsy-Turvy”, technology does not always progress in a linear fashion; if there is insufficient demand for an invention, the technical knowledge underpinning it can very well disappear for centuries. For instance, the steam engine was first invented by Hero of Alexandria in the first century AD; it was used to open the gates of the temple of Alexandria by remote control, to prove to the assembly of worshippers that the gods had entered to accept their offerings. Afterwards, nothing is heard of the steam engine for the next 1600 years, until it was reinvented by Thomas Newcombe for draining water out of coal mines. Science and technology cannot steadily progress or even sustain themselves at their current levels unless there is a strong social need for them.  Without this impetus, scientific curiosa are forgotten very soon. Another example relates to the extremely sophisticated urban drainage systems of cities in the Indus valley civilization – such as Mohenjo Daro and Harappa – of third millennium BCE India.  A main sewer connected with many north-south and east-west sewers: all kept watertight by expert masonry. Each house had its own drains that emptied into the sewer system. Archaeologist Rita Wright describes how this system remained unparalleled, in its technical excellence, until the twentieth century, even in the west. As pointed out by Amartya Sen in “The Argumentative Indian”, these technologies vanished but remained unrivalled for the next four thousand years, not only in India but also in the west, while we might have expected them to spread to other corners of the ancient world, and definitely to continue to be used by the descendants of the people who were once part of this urban civilization.Perhaps that is what happened with aircraft in ancient India.

Our narrative on the history of aircraft in Indian literature comes full circle with the reappearance of Bharadwaja in nineteenth and twentieth century India. Please recall Bharadwaja, who, as a member of the Marut family, acquired detailed knowledge about flying vehicles. His legacy emerged much later, in the Vaimanika Shastra. composed by Pandit Subbaraya Shastry (1866-1940) who dictated its contents, apparently during 1918-23. The Pandit, in turn, claimed to have received knowledge of the contents of the book from his guru, a wandering ascetic, who in turn had passed on the received wisdom of Bharadwaja. The book contained ancient prescriptions for making different types of vehicles capable of flight. Our British rulers frowned on any funding or research to explore the contents of the book. In fact, they immediately put Subbaraya in jail, where he remained till his dying day. Thus, the general public never got to have any interaction with him.

A civilization undergoing a thousand years of subjugation and foreign invasion might certainly be destroyed and crumble to pieces. The Indian civilization did not do so even after subjugation by Muslim and Christian rulers, and despite being subjected to constant foreign invasions, managed to withstand them. But we certainly had to suffer and pay a price in terms of the erosion of our self-confidence and self-image, internalizing our inferiority to whites as a fact. Many Indians, some of them scientists, thus immediately labelled the book as a fraud and a hoax.

Currently, the research scene has changed. Some of the models of aircraft described in the book were tested in 2017 by Travis Taylor, an aerospace engineer, at the University of California, Irvine. Performing a wind tunnel experiment, Taylor found that the model was flight-worthy.[1] This raises a very interesting question. How and where did Subbaraya, a very poor man of little formal education, an ascetic who roamed the forests in search of a guru, a man persecuted by illness, find enough knowledge to write about not only airplanes, but even spacecraft? We must remember that such knowledge was not available at that time in the white man’s world either, especially with regard to spacecraft. The answer to this question is not available today. Maybe it will require a lot more funding and research to unlock the mystery. The rumour is that NASA and even China are interested in the book. Good luck to them! But we would really like it if Indians also could benefit from this, or at least gain a deeper understanding of how the minds of our ancestors worked.

Indrani Guha and Brishti Guha


[1] The YouTube video of the experiment is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpKIj4-bmt0

Understanding ‘Hijab row’ from Islamic framework

The Hijab row that started in a Karnataka schools during February 2022 had later spread to other states of the country. Different Muslims leaders and community members, including non-Hijabi female Islamist journalists, have come forward in support of wearing of Hijab by the school students, despite having dress code. Left-Liberal cabal too, has come forward in support of Hijab. The justifications given by different groups in favor of Hijab ranged from ‘religious duty’ to ‘personal choice’ to ‘fundamental right’.

During the first week of April 2022, Al Qaeda chief, Ayman Al Zawahiri, in a video praised the Muslim student Muskan Khan of Karnataka who shouted Allah hu Akbar in a school by wearing a Burqa. Zawahiri also asked Indian Muslims to unite for Hijab cause. So what actually happened in Karnataka school during February 2022 was tip of the Islamic iceberg. The notorious Indian Islamic organization like Popular Front of India and other Jihadi organizations have come together under the umbrella of Al Qaeda to push Islamism in India.

But nobody cares to look deeper to see that Muslim women of Indian sub-continent never used Hijab historically. They used Ghunghat, Pallu or Do-Patta. No Indian painting of Muslim era could show the wearing of Hijab. In India Hijab is a post 9/11 Islamic symbolism only. The Hijab row in India can’t be understood in isolation. One needs to examine the issue from larger Islamic framework.

Islam is a political doctrine of totalitarian imperialism. Islam mandates Muslims to conquer the whole world. The Standard Islamic Narrative (SIN) was constructed retrospectively, too late and in too distant places from Mecca and Medina, by Abbasid Caliphate between eighth and tenth centuries. However, the process started in late seventh century under Umayyad Caliph Abd al-Malik in Damascus. None of the SIN (Sirat, Sahih Hadith and Tafsir) was written in Mecca or Medina, but in Tabaristan (Iran), Bagdad (Iraq), Bukhara (Uzbekistan), and Basra (Iraq) which were hundreds of miles away from Mecca and Medina and that too hundreds of years after Muhammad’s death.

There is also no archeological evidence to prove that Mecca and Medina were very ancient human settlements as claimed under SIN. [Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gFyiMvELzY]. The present-day Quran, also known as Uthman Quran, is claimed to have been compiled 20 years after Muhammad’s death. But it got its first mention in the Sahih Hadith, which was compiled more than 200 years after Muhammad’s death in faraway places from Medina and Mecca.

With the fall of Persian and Byzantine Empires in the beginning of seventh century, Arabs came up as new Empire. But, unlike Christians Byzantine and Zoroastrian Persian, they lacked in pedigree. They needed a new religion, a Prophet and laws. Thus Muhammad, Islam and Sharia were created over a long period from late seventh to tenth centuries.

For imperialistic reasons, Islam was made as regimented, violent, aggressive, exclusive and intolerant doctrine. Over the centuries, these negative attributes became a part and parcel of Muslim psyche. The foundational principle of Islam has been “heads I win, tails you lose”. All totalitarian doctrines have to follow this principle. The classic example of this in Islam is the so-called defensive wars of Muhammad from which he collected spoils of war (Maal-e-Ghanimat) also. In Indian context it is “Pakistan we got, India you lost” for them.

The main Hindu leader of Indian freedom struggle, M K Gandhi, had a peculiar mindset. He condoned the anti-Hindu violence of Muslims on all occasions. But he was extra critical and angry of anything in reverse direction. It is claimed by different scholars that Gandhi did so to achieve Hindu-Muslim unity for fighting unitedly against British for independence. But did such unity ever exist in India? This is not even a one rupee question. However, the final nail into the coffin of Hindu-Muslim unity was driven by the Muslims with their demand, violent fight and ultimate creation of Islamic Pakistan in August 1947.

With creation of Pakistan, the fraud of Hindu-Muslim unity was supposed to stop. But Congress, in independent India, carried on with this fraud with more zeal and earnest. The party, which ruled India for about six decades after independence, did not go for complete exchange of population after partition. Congress rather started treating ‘Pakistan supporting Indian Muslims’ with extra care and love. Indian Muslims also got a politically convenient tag of ‘minority’ for them.

Had British India been Muslim majority, there would not be any partition. Muslims created Islamic Pakistan by truncating British India because they were minority with about 24 percent of population. So, how they again became minority in independent India by staying back here after creation of Islamic Pakistan? Was not that to complete the unfinished agenda of making whole of India Islamic? Indian Constitution and Gandhian Congress helped them in pushing that agenda in independent India. Communists and Liberals also helped them as catalysts in this Islamic agenda.

So, offering Namaz on roads, giving Azan through multiple loudspeakers from lakhs of mosques across the country five times a day, more and more construction of new mosque, Mazar (particularly encroaching public lands)and Madrasa, uncontrolled increase in population, increasing use of skull cap, and increasing number of Muslim men keeping beard, – comprised Islamic symbolism, which has been in ever increasing trend in independent India. This symbolism encourages the Indian Muslims to assert them with Muslims first identity. By 2047 (after hundred years of independence), Muslims in many parts of the India will be majority and start demanding independence from India. The picture in Assam, West Bengal and Kerala is very encouraging for them from that perspective.

Islam being an imperialistic totalitarian doctrine, Muslim community in non-Arab India grew as two social classes, namely, Ashraf and Pasmanda. Broadly speaking, those Muslims who are of foreign descent are Ashraf and all local converts are called Pasmanda. This division is very distinct and they don’t inter-marry or inter-dine. Approximately 15 percent of Indian Muslims are Ashraf. But they are historically the elite class with economic and socio-political superiority. They influence and control the socio-economically backward Pasmanda, who constitutes about 85 percent of Muslim population. For propagating Islamism in India, Ashraf Muslims mainly make the intellectual and political core-group. The Pasmanda Muslims are used as foot soldiers for street fight, riot, mass public protest, bomb blasts and destruction of public and private properties in the name of Islam.    

Islamic symbolism described above has increased exponentially in India after 9/11. It also works as litmus test for the Indian Muslims to understand the quantum and intensity of reaction and resistance from the majority community of Indian Hindus. When situation is conducive, they push a new symbolism. This time it was Hijab in schools. It was a manufactured issue. If due to any reason Indian Muslims face resistance in their new move, they may turn violent and start playing ‘Islamic victim card’ in the same breath.

Quran is prescriptive to all Muslims for all times to come. Quran 3:28 and 8:55 mandate them to hate Kafir and Quran 5:9 mandates them to kill Kafir. There are many such verses of Quran which are hateful and violent towards Kafir. In the recent (first and second week April 2022) attacks on Hindu religious processions by them in different parts of India, they were simply following the mandates of Quran. They were doing Jihad against Hindu Kafir only. Their prophet never took responsibility of any of his violent activity. He always blamed the other party. One finds the same behavior in them even after 1400 years. In the above mentioned attacks on Hindu religious processions, they blamed the Hindus and placed them as victims.   

The Islamic teachings don’t allow them to rest unless and until India is made Islamic. Muslims are mandated to conquer the whole world. India is a part of that global conquest. The bottom line is either they will conquer India or they will destroy the country. Lebanon is a burning example of this in our modern time. The Congress and Left-Liberal-Secular cabal of India need to wake-up from the self-deceiving slumber.

——————————————————————-         

PS: Karnatake High Court has since ruled that Hijab was not compulsory under Islam and thus Muslim girl students were not to  violate the school dress code by wearing Hijab in school. But the verdict of Karnataka High Court has been challenged in the Supreme Court.

The political Jihad by the ‘gang of thirteen’

From Chaitra Shukladi on 2 April to Ram Navami on 10 April and Hanuman Jayanti on 16 April, the period of the year 2022 was marred with communal violence in Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Delhi, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Maharashtra. All were connected with Hindu festival celebrations. Muslims were determined not to allow Hindus to celebrate their festivals. The Muslim mobs, including women, indulged in stone pelting, throwing of petrol bomb, firing, burning, and arson in Hindu processions.

Left-Liberal-Islamist cabal jumped in the Social Media and news portals without wasting any time and started peddling fake news blaming Hindus for the violence. NDTV of Prannoy James Roy even promoted ‘Muslim areas’ in India and made those ‘no go areas’ for Hindus. When the evil cabal was exposed, their big brothers from the political field entered into the field.

Communal violence was a law and order problem and came under the respective state government. Moreover out of nine states affected five were non-BJP ruled. The political masters of Left-Liberal-Islamist gang did not ask question to any state government. They did not ask Mamata Banerjee, what she did to pre-empt and control communal violence in West Bengal. Same was the case with Congress Chief Minister of Jharkhand Hemant Soren. They played their old record of blaming Modi and Hindus only.     

Thus a joint statement was issued by 13 opposition leaders, led by Sonia Gandhi, on 16 April 2022 expressing their concern over recent communal violence in different parts of India. The content of the statement was neither spectacular nor unexpected.

The statement accused Hindus as perpetrators of violence and that too they were accused of committing violence under the patronage of BJP government at Centre. Nothing different was expected from those 13 leaders, who and who’s Parties have all along been grossly pro-Muslim and bitterly anti-Hindu.

Congress, under Sonia Gandhi’s spell, has been staunchly pro-Muslims. The old Party did not feel it necessary to re-look at its hatred towards majority Hindus and gradual passage of the Party towards oblivion for that. Among the signatories, the presence of Naxal and Indian Union Muslim League was not really weird. They symbolized the political tentacles of Sonia Gandhi and Congress.

Tight grip of ED and CBI on NCP had compelled Sharad Pawar to oblige the Italian woman, for whom he left Congress decades back. It was never imagined that Mamata Banerjee (TMC) would lose such a golden opportunity to please her “Dudhel Gai” (milk giving cow), who have kept her in power in the state of West Bengal. Her fate was in their hands. She had no other option. M K Stalin of anti-Hindu DMK party from Tamil Nadu used the opportunity to bash Hindi-BJP government for misplaced Dravidian pride.

Congress Chief Minister of Jharkhand, Hemant Soren, was an eager signatory as he hated BJP for his connection with ‘Rice Bag Gang’. Farooq Abdullah (NC), a known Islamist politician from Kashmir valley, increased the Jihadi tune of the statement. Tejashwi Yadav (RJD), a product of M-Y Gang, had a good opportunity to express his solidarity with ‘Fasadi Qaum’. The political broker and disruptive leftist Parties like CPM, CPI, FB, and RSP only increased the nuisance value of the Joint Statement.

Absence of Uddhav Thackeray (Shiv Sena), Ashok Gehlot (Congress), C Chandrashekar Rao (TRS) and Kejriwal (AAP) in the nautanky was expected. While Uddhav was losing Hindu vote base in Maharashtra, Gehlot was losing political grip in Rajasthan. C Chandrashekar Rao was worried about the rise of BJP in Telangana and Kejriwal was scared of showing any more pro-Muslim stand after supporting anti-CAA movement and Delhi riot. So, they remained away from Sonia Gandhi sponsored political Jihad for the time being.   

भाजपा से विपक्ष को सीखना चाहिए

वो कहते हैं ना सफलता का कोई शार्टकट नहीं होता हैं, भाजपा ने ये साबित कर दिखाया। याद कीजिए 2014 से पहले की भाजपा को, एक ऐसी पार्टी जिसमें जीत की बहुत ज्यादा ख्वाहिश नहीं दिखती थी, जो महज संयोग पर निर्भर करती थी। आडवाणी की रथयात्रा के बाद ले-देकर वह ‘राम’ के फ़ोर्मुले पर निर्भर थी। जब भी कोई चुनाव नजदीक आता, वह ‘राममंदिर’ को लेकर अपनी सक्रियता बढ़ा देती थी। जीत का फोर्मुला इतना घिस-पिट चुका था न तो उसकी कोई गंभीरता रह गईं थी और न ही साख। इसी दरमियान पार्टी के एक राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्ष को रिश्वत लेते पूरी दुनिया ने कैमरे पर भी देखा था।लेकिन 2014 के बाद का जो घटनाक्रम रहा, उसमे भाजपा ने एक नई इबादत लिख दी, उसने जो पहला पाठ पढाया, वह यह कि पॉलिटिक्स कोई पार्ट टाइम जॉब हो ही नहीं सकती।

इन सारी बातों का जिक्र इसलिए, क्यूंकि देश की सबसे बड़ी पार्टी और ताकतवर पार्टी बन चुकी भाजपा को हमने देखा था कैसे तेलंगाना की राजधानी हैदराबाद नगर निगम चुनाव में उसने अपने शीर्ष नेतृत्व को झोंक दिया था, यह एक नया परिदृश्य था, किसी राज्य के महज एक नगर निगम के चुनाव में केंद्र में सत्तारूढ़ पार्टी इस तरह से मोर्चा ले रही थी, जैसे वो आम चुनाव का हिस्सा हो। विपक्ष ने इस नए प्रयोग का मजाक भी उड़ाया और आलोचना भी की। लेकिन उनका ये व्यवहार शुतुरमुर्ग की मानिंद कहा जायेगा। शुतुरमुर्ग के बारे में कहा जाता हैं कि जब तूफान आने वाला होता हैं तो वह अपना सिर रेत में छुपा लेता हैं ताकि उसे ये दिखे नहीं तूफान आने वाला हैं। हैदराबाद नगर निगम के चुनाव में भाजपा ने दूसरा पाठ ये सिखाया कि कोई चुनाव छोटा नहीं होता, क्यूंकि बड़े चुनाव का रास्ता छोटे चुनाव से ही होकर गुजरता हैं। भाजपा ने 150 वार्ड वाली हैदराबाद नगर निगम के चुनाव में 35.56 % वोट शेयर के साथ 48 सीटें जीतकर धमाकेदार एंट्री मार दी थी। जिस तेलंगाना राज्य का गठन कांग्रेस ने किया था वहां पर दो विधानसभा चुनाव हो चुके हैं जिसमें कांग्रेस की बुरी हार हुई थी, हैदराबाद नगर निगम के चुनाव में कांग्रेस का खाता तक नहीं खुला था।

‘आराम हराम है’ बना सूत्र वाक्य

भाजपा ने हाल ही में उत्तर प्रदेश, उत्तराखंड, गोवा और त्रिपुरा सहित चार राज्यों में दोबारा से सरकार बनाई हैं,एक राज्य का चुनाव खत्म होता नहीं कि भाजपा का अगले राज्य में डेरा जम जाता हैं। चार राज्यों के बाद अब अगर सबसे ज्यादा प्रतिष्ठापूर्ण मुक़ाबले होने हैं तो वो गुजरात और हिमाचल। कोई विपक्ष का नेता यह बता सकता हैं कि पिछले छः महीने के दौरान उसने गुजरात और हिमाचल को कितना वक़्त दिया या उसके पास इन दोनों राज्यों के चुनाव के लिए कोई ख़ाका हैं? यकीनी तौर पर उसका जबाब नहीं में ही होगा। उधर भाजपा के लिए अमित शाह खुद मोर्चा संभाले हुए हैं। चुनाव घोषित होने तक अमित शाह का ज्यादातर वक़्त गुजरात और हिमाचल में ही बीतेगा। हिमाचल प्रदेश के भाजपा संगठन ने अपने कार्यकर्ताओं को 2 दिन का अवकाश दिया हैं, जो भी जरुरी कार्य करने हैं वो निपटा ले उसके बाद चुनाव समाप्त होने तक कोई छुट्टी नहीं मिलेगी। विधानसभा सीटों को जोन में बांट दिया हैं, हर जोन एक राष्ट्रीय पदाधिकारी के ज़िम्मे सौंप दिया गया हैं। राष्ट्रीय पदाधिकारी प्रदेश के सांसद, विधायक, जिलाध्यक्ष, पूर्व जिलाध्यक्ष,जिला प्रभारी और बूथ अध्यक्षों  से सीधा संपर्क में रहेंगे। विपक्ष शायद तब सक्रिय होगा, जब चुनाव की तारीख घोषित हो जाएगी और पहला कदम होगा कि महागठबंधन बने।

भाजपा जब अपने उम्मीदवारों के नामों को अंतिम रूप दे रही होगी, तो विपक्ष के ख़ेमे में गठबंधन का हिस्सा बनाने को हाँ और ना चल रही होगी.अगर राष्ट्रीय परिदृश्य से देखे तो पता चलता हैं की भाजपा के राष्टीय अध्यक्ष जेपी नड्डा अगले कुछ महीनें देश को मथते हुए नजर आएगें।अलग- अलग राज्यों में पहुंचकर वे अपने को सांसदों और विधायकों तक ही सीमित नहीं रखेगें, बल्क़ि बूथ अध्यक्ष और बूथ समितियों के साथ बैठकें भी करेगें। 2019 में जिन लोकसभा क्षेत्रों में भाजपा का प्रदर्शन निराशाजनक रहा था, उन क्षेत्रों में संगठन की मजबूती पर उनका फोकस रहेगा। विपक्ष के लिए यह सब सिखाने वाली बातें हैं।अगर नहीं सीखता हैं तो फिर निराशा के भंवर से निकल पाना उसके लिए आसान नहीं होगा।

लेख – अभिषेक कुमार (Political & Election Analyst)

Rejoinder to Chatham House column “Democracy in India”

(Explaining the history, structure and challenge of democracy in the Republic of India dt. 07 April 2022 by Dr. Gareth Price, Senior Research Fellow, Asia-Pacific Programme)

This rejoinder tries to expose the biased analysis about “Democracy in India” by author Dr. Price who writes for London based eminent Think Tank Chatham House, otherwise known as Royal Institute of International Affairs.

History of democracy in India

Here, the author writes, “In the 1970s Indira Gandhi broke with this successful formula and attempted to concentrate power in the central government. When these efforts were resisted, she declared a state of emergency in 1975, arresting journalists, politicians and other opponents.” This is baseless. Indira imposed National Emergency after she was found guilty for electoral malpractice by Allahabad High Court.

J. L. Nehru’s daughter Indira Gandhi married to Feroze Gandi, a Parsi, not Feroze Gandhi. She manipulated the issue and got herself the title of Gandhi in order to gain electoral benefit from M. K. Gandhi fans whose number was very high due to the foolishness of Nathuram Godse, his assassin who was of the believe that Gandhi was reasons of many national problems related to Indo-Pakistan relation. Many people in India still believe that Indira married to Feroze, the adopted son of M. K. Gandhi.

The author stated that BJP won the most of parliamentary seats from northern states such as UP, Bihar and MP in GE2014 and GE2019 is fallacious. Along with northern states, the party had also won majority of seats in Karnataka, and Goa, the two south Indian states in GE2014 and GE2019 consecutively. Also had clean-swept western states such as Maharashtra and Gujarat, won majority seats in North-East, and large number of seats in Jharkhand, West Bengal (2019), Chhattisgarh and Odisha (2019).

Challenges of democracy in India

Under the above subhead, Dr. Price writes ‘India could not achieve neighboring China kind economic development’ without going into the details of the existing political/governance systems in these two countries. He should have mentioned that China has been under rule of single party authoritarian communist regime without popular elections due to which policy planner least bother about people’s opinions even if the policy/ies are anti-people and there is no place for populous policies and freebies welfarisms, while India has democracy where governments keep on changing every now and then –even before fixed term of five years in many cases. In India, development policies with long-term economic benefits are delegislated (per example Farm Laws)due to oppositions from miniscule vested interests with moral and financial supports from hypocritical western democracies and their so-called human rightists.

The author admitted that since independence considerable development had taken place in India, and they are uneven. I (this rejoinder’s author) agree with Dr. Price’s finding. And here I write the facts. During early years of independence, India got world cases educational institution such as five IITs, one AIIMS, four IIMs, etc. at great cost, only in metros. And India’s top academicians were recruited to them, and the education expenses for those institutions were buried in the union budget year after year and decade after decade when there was no blackboards and all season roofs in majority of schools both in towns and villages. Do Dr. Price knows who were studying there and where are these institutions’ products are now? 90% of them are children of families who could afford high cost coaching in metros, and after completion of their studies they left for developed countries causing huge brain drains. Other undeniable aspect is: five IITs, one AIIMS and four IIMs with few thousands or hundred seats (AIIMS) for millions of applicants. Big questions are: Why seats had not increased? Why the passed out students were not discouraged to leave their motherlands where they were born and brought up at a great cost to their poor natives/cousins? Instead these institutions’ authorities were very happy for getting placements for their students in MNCs, and were found highlighting these ‘anti-India achievements’ through media reports and institutions’ annual reports. Was it because the earlier rulers –three prime ministers who ruled the country for 38 years out of 42 years of self-rule (1947 to 1989) and were from one family- of country were educated in West and had an electoral vested interest in poverty, under-development and illiteracy of the country?

During last 8 years and from 1998 to 2004 (earlier BJP rule), number of IITs, IIMs and AIIMSs have been increased by many folds. Apart from them, new institutions of excellence in the names of IISER, IIIT, NISER, Central Universities, Central Schools, Sainik Schools, etc. have been started with increased budget allocations, students’ scholarships and liberal study loans (without collaterals in many cases) which could have been done earlier. Liberalization of education sector, which allows increased private participation, has helped the country get world class universities though the Western rating agencies have not been so pleased to give their recognisation despite the fact that Western MNCs gate-crash in these institutions to get Indian students for their jobs.

Here, the critics may ask that increased number of top institutions might contribute to increase in brain drains. No, it is not so now as employment opportunities with world class facilities have been developed in the country now. Due to this many sectors have been witnessing reverse brain drain. Per example, in the US, defence manufacturing and research sectors among others were the major recruiters of top brains. And in India, the successive governments had a policy of importing maximum arms and ammunitions, and through which bureaucrats and their political masters were filling their Western bank accounts.  Now, the defence manufacturing sector has been liberalized and maximum arm forces purchases have been reserved for internal procurements.

Regarding elimination of extreme poverty, I would like to request Dr. Price to read April 5, 2022 report of IMF under title “Pandemic, Poverty and Inequality: Evidence from India”. For his information, Western appreciated secular, liberal and democratic Indira Gandhi won election in 1971 with Garib Hatao (eliminate poverty) slogan. And since 1971, she and her son Rajiv Gandhi ruled India till 1989 with two and half years break, and after that, their owned party Congress ruled India from 1991 to 1996 and again from 2004 to 2014 when their family’s imported daughter-in-law Sonia Gandhi was de facto ruler of country though London School of Economics educated but never democratically elected –rarely seen in any democratic counties including West- Dr. Manmohan Singh was PM; yet the effort for extreme poverty elimination had to wait till 2014, and found greatly eliminated post two years long horrendous pandemic when many countries around the world witnessed rapid increase in poverty.

Dr. Price writes and I quote, “Indian nationalism and populism have fed off this (poverty) discontent by scapegoating religious minorities – notably Muslims and Dalits – while increasing pride for many Hindus”. Will the author be kind to give an example of Indian nationalists scapegoating religious minorities – notably Muslims and Dalits- for poverty? From where Dr. Price got to know that Dalits are minorities in India, so he bracketed Muslims and Dalits together?

Also the Chatham House researcher writes, “Since before independence nationalists have argued that India should be the homeland for South Asia’s Hindus, as Pakistan was for its Muslims”. Can the author deny the fact that British India was balkanized on religious ground as instigated by departing western colonial power? Muslims got their homeland as per their wish, but majority of them stayed back in India. For the author’s information, at the time of partition, Hindu population in Pakistan was 22%. Now it has come down to less than 2%, while in India Muslims population increased from 9.8% to 14.2%. If there is minority discrimination as propagated in Western media and researchers, how could their population increase in India and Hindu population going to be nil in Pakistan in next one decade? Despite the anti-India propaganda in West, India’s largest business conglomerate that is Tata Group has been running for century by Tata family, who are Parsi, a minority of minorities?

Dr. Price writes, “Kashmir, the only Muslim-majority state in India, was put under lockdown from 2019-2021 and subjected to a communications blackout. The region’s autonomous status was revoked, and thousands were arrested, including Kashmiri politicians, activists and separatists.” Here, I may suggest to Dr. Price to read India’s post-independence history mostly guided by British policy of princely states annexation with either India or Pakistan. ‘The region(Kashmir)’s autonomous status’, the author talked about was a temporary provision. Should the temporary provision remain so indefinitely? And using this provision, should Islamic terrorists continue to rain havoc in the state and not allow Hindu minority, who were raped, murdered and evicted in late 1980s and early 1990s and now staying in refugee camps, to get rehabilitated? Regarding Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 that Modi Government enacted and Dr. Price talked about, I want to inform him that the need of the same was strongly felt by the Western applauded liberal and secular Congress Party in 1948 when minorities mostly Hindus in Muslims majority Pakistan were targeted and they had no alternative but either to convert or be stateless. Many of them to save their lives migrated to India and remain stateless for decades when the Western liberal and human right activists, who are now crying over the new law and branded the new law discriminatory, remained silent.

As per the author, the economic growth in India has been slowed down during BJP rule. He has this opinion in view of his ignorance about economic growth during Congress rules from 1947 to 1989 and he refuses to acknowledge –may be due to vested interest- the impact of dreaded pandemic on world economy for two consecutive year 2020-21 and 2021-22, and which has not yet subsided in 2022. Regarding religious polarization during Modi rule, I would like to remind Dr. Price former Congress PM Dr. Manmohan Singh statement “Muslims must have first claim to national resources”. As per Dr. Price’s own admission in his column, there is widespread poverty in India, means poverty is there irrespective of religions, castes, creed, etc. When this is a fact how could a PM educated in world renowned economics institution and branded a great secular-liberal-democrat said “Muslims must have first claim to national resources”? Should not this fuel religious polarization in the society?

Dr. Price writes, “Trust in the law is further undermined by India’s dysfunctional legal system, which leaves many languishing in detention before trial for ‘crimes’ including peaceful protest.” The author writes this without any example. Had he given some examples, it would have been better to rebut them. If he thinks detentions of anti-nationals, naxalites, terrorists, separatists, anti-socials, etc. anything to do to democracy, he is advised to look inward on what is happening in Western countries and what their coalition had done in Afghanistan, Iraq, etc.

Regarding several demographic challenges and selective abortion raised in the column, I may suggest the researcher-author to study the report. Yes these issues were societal challenges decade back during the Western appreciated liberal and democratic rule of Gandhi-Congress. Since 2014, during Modi rule, these issues have been taken care of with right seriousness and now sex ratio is 1020 females to 1000 males replacing earlier sex ratio of 940 females to 1000 males.

Indian political system

Under above highlighted subhead, Dr. Price writes “Last names (of Indian nationals) often indicate to which caste a person belongs”. This is absolutely wrong and fallacious. There is title called ‘Das’ which is there in every caste in northern and eastern India. In state of Odisha, title ‘Behera’ is there in Brahmin, Vaishya and Sudra or Dalit castes; means in three castes. Similarly, widely used title ‘Singh’ is there in all castes in north India. In south India and among many Sikhs in north India’s Punjab state, last name often indicate place of birth. In this column, author writes name of former Finance Minister and Congress MP Palaniappan Chidambaram. Here, last name Chidambaram indicate his place of birth in southern state Tamilnadu. Also, in some cases, father’s name is last name of many people.

Secularism and democracy in India

Under above subhead, author writes, “The constitution is secular in that it prohibits the persecution of individuals for their religious beliefs, but it does not specifically separate church and state in the fashion of the United States constitution”. Here, I don’t understand –if there is no vested interest- the logic for clubbing together two issues ‘persecution of individuals for their religious beliefs’ and ‘separation of church and state in the fashion of the United States constitution’. When the author writes ‘it (Indian Constitution) does not specifically separate church and state in the fashion of the United States constitution’, he has not given specific Indian example or instance to justify his conclusion. Therefore, I feel it is imperative to inform him that despite his claim of separation of church and state in US constitution, the country’s politicians including President take oath of office keeping hands on the Bible; whereas in India, politicians take oath of office in the name of Indian Constitution.

Democracy and corruption in India

The author under the above subhead writes, “Indian politics has been plagued by corruption for decades. A wave of scandals engulfed the Congress-led coalition government that assumed power in 2010.” Please correct the fact replacing 2010 with 2004. This highly corrupt government under LSE educated economist PM Dr. Manmohan Singh came to power in 2004 and was there till 2014.

Regarding corruption scandals’ over purchase of Rafale fighter jets, I would like to request the author to investigate the issue in Paris as the deal was signed between France and Indian government to take care of depleted lethal power of Indian Air Force neglected by earlier Congress government for reason best known to that despite known lethal China-Pakistan strategic nexus with which India fought three wars and several bloody border skirmishes. This issue raised despite apex court rejection of any wrong doing, just before the General Election 2019 and subsided post election.

Future of democracy in India

The opinion placed by Dr. Price about the ‘future of democracy in India’ is worthless and time waste to read simple because he does not know the basic fact of Indian Democracy as illustrated above. When he writes ‘Congress-led coalition government that assumed power in 2010’, he exposed his poor knowledge about current situation in India. With this knowledge, how could he be right person to present his correct assumption on ‘future of democracy in India’? Perhaps he wrote this column for time-pass or has a vested interest to defame Chatham House image.

Will democracy survive in India?

Dr. Price writes, “Through its control of the media, monopolization of campaign finance and harassment of opponents, India seems set on a path to becoming an illiberal pseudo-democracy similar to Turkey or Russia.  However, when the BJP has faced a united opposition in recent state elections it has generally lost.” If media is controlled under Modi rule how could The Washington Post India Bureau Chief Gerry Shih, who was earlier expelled from Beijing tweeted sitting in New Delhi, “Modi on ‘same page as China on the issues of human rights, climate change, the treatment of religious minorities and freedom of expression …. claims of Western hypocrisy emanating from Indian diplomats could well be coming from Chinese diplos’ @SushantSin” in response to a column in The Caravan under title “The Ukraine crisis spotlights the West’s need to understand India’s democratic decline”? If Dr. Price thinks Modi government should not act against lie-peddler journalists, politicians and social activists such as Rajdeep Sardesai, Shashi Tharoor, etc. for tweeting farmer accident death as police fired death on Republic Day that is on January 26, 2021, then I will certainly assume that the author has some vested interest. If there is monopolization of campaign finance as alleged how in Punjab and West Bengal anti-BJP parties such as AAP and TMC won the election with 2/3 majorities?

Regarding demonetization, Dr. Price says this was BJP initiative. No. This was as advocated by the Father of Indian Constitution Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, a LSE alumni, decades back in 1950s. He wanted the demonetization in every ten years. Later, in 1971, Wanchoo Committee recommended demonetization to Indira Gandhi government which snubbed the idea for electoral vested interest.

Regarding the farmers protest over Farm Laws, this is to inform to Dr. Price that the agriculture sector reform laws were withdrawn due to western funded political agitation by vested interests who want Modi Government lose the 2022 Assembly elections. Farmers were just used like foolish Zelensky used to fight Biden war against Putin in Europe. On March 11, 2022, next day of election results publication, the ideologue of agitation Jogendra Yadav openly admitted in TV interview that the agitation was ‘political stunt’ to facilitate opposition parties to come to power. This Yogendra Yadav wished to slap voters for defeating him with loss of deposit in GE2019. Yet Modi Government never arrests him. He has been normally found in all kinds of agitations in New Delhi, so popularly known as andolanjeevi.

Kashmir: The truth ‘unheard’ or denied to be heard?

19’90 a year filled with torment for true Indians, happiness for anti Indians and dilemma for a so called ‘majority group’ in a state with ‘presumed minority’. Kashmiri pandits, this is not just a word to identify a group but a name with an expression, an experience which is spoken about but wrongly, an experience which is agreed upon only to disagree. Firdaus says, “if there is heaven on earth, it is here, it is here, it is here!” But is it so? Riots, murder, rape that’s what happens in the ‘ostensible’ heaven of OURS. Kashmir was considered a paradise, origin of intellects, home of the beauty, but that was all forgotten after the prelude of the dark hour which continues even in the present.

There were many riots before, many threats but no action and when acted upon, it seemed as if all those threats were the silence before the beginning of a disaster. They searched each house for Pandits, burnt their houses, held banners to chase them hunted them down, killed the men, raped the women, tortured the family not sparing even children. The Kashmiri Pandits were forced to eat rice with the blood of their family, the women were raped for months, kids and women were kidnapped and sent to Pakistan and this was a chain. All this was done by the so called ‘minority’ in Kashmir. A group of ‘minority’ killed and tortured a group of majority in a few days. The voices of a group of majority was suddenly silenced in a matter of few hours, they were shunned and shoed away from their own houses in a matter of split seconds. All this was done by a group of ‘minority’. 

Ralive, Tsalive, Galive, convert! Run, die yelled on the streets of Kashmir, written on the walls of Kashmiri Pandits by the presumed minorities. This presumption happened because of the assumption by some great students who come from great colleges. All Indian citizens by name but by heart, they all are no different from those who shout and propagate killing in the name of religion. These student popularise being anti-nationals. They live in India, are Indians, demand for everything from India and even expect that their demands are ought to be fulfilled but even after all this, speak against India. Their professors encourage the students to opine that Kashmir should not be a part of India. It can be said that, not all terrorists carry gun, some carry pen as well. 

Strangely, students who speak against India are well educated and well informed but still get brainwashed, they still don’t think on their own. We can’t even blame the students for getting persuaded to think in a certain way. No curriculum in schools or colleges talk about the truth of India. Students are taught about Gandhi but not about his malafide intentions. They are told Kashmir should not be a part of India but not why was Kashmir a part of India. In all History books prescribed there is a contribution of historians such as Romila Thappar who are well known to be writing rhetoric and manipulating the history of India. It can be the truth about the death of Dr. Subhash Chandra Bose, Lal Bahadur Shastri or the truth about these Kashmiri pandits being the minority then and now. 

The best example of an Indian being an anti-national is a renowned author who we all know as Suzanna Arundhati Roy. She has always been against the idea of Kashmir being a part of India, Why? Because in her opinion the rallies, killings, and the unjust actions done showed the desire of the Kashmiris to not be a part of India rather than the union. She was not only criticised by the Indian national Congress and Bharatiya janta Party, but also by many nationalists to have such an opinion. She lives in India, is an Indian citizen, wants the nation and the government to fulfil all her malacious demands but is always against the unity of the nation. She is known not only as an author but also as an activist for Human rights and the environment. But not once has she raised her voice that centres on the unity of the nation or that will benefit the society. Another such instance is when she and Medha Patkar who is also an Indian Social activist raised their disagreement in the Sardar Sarovar Project.

Many like them call themselves to be activists and claim to be voicing issues for the benefit of the country whereas their only intention is on how their action can benefit in the destruction of the nation. Calling Mohammad Afzal Guru, who was involved in the 2001 Indian parliament attack to have been scapegoated to saying Kashmir should not be a part of India anymore or being clicked meeting Yasin Malik, who is the murderer of Indian Airforce Officers and also the Kashmiri Pandits proves the point on how superficial she and those who side with her are. She was also They are no less anti nationals than those who openly popularize the idea of disrupting our nation.     

कांग्रेस से परेशान 500 से अधिक करौली के प्रतिनिधियों ने की भाजपा जोइन

करौली (राजस्थान) में नवसंवत्सर (दो अप्रैल) को हुए उपद्रव के बाद तनावपूर्ण शांति कायम है। इसी बीच, उपद्रव के बाद दलित और आदिवासी समाज के 500 से ज्यादा प्रतिनिधियों ने अम्बेडकर जयन्ती पर भाजपा की सदस्यता ग्रहण की है। भाजपा के प्रदेश अध्यक्ष सतीश पूनिया ने इन लोगों को पार्टी की सदस्यता ग्रहण करवाई है।

सरकार ने अपनी नाकामी और करतूतों को छुपाने की दृष्टि से उपद्रव के दस दिन बाद करौली के जिला कलक्टर राजेंद्र सिंह शेखावत को हटा दिया है और उनके स्थान पर अंकित कुमार सिंह को लगा दिया है। पुलिस ने उपद्रव करने वालों की पहचान का सिलसिला जारी रखा है। वही, बसपा के प्रदेश अध्यक्ष हंसराज बालौती, 2018 के विधानसभा चुनाव सपोटरा से बसपा के प्रत्याशी रहे हंसराज, सपोटरा की प्रधान कमली देवी, हेमराज गोटिया, पूर्व पंचायत समिति सदस्य परसुराम मीणा, पूर्व जिला परिषद सदस्य धर्म सिंह फौजी सहित कई प्रमुख लोगों ने अपने समर्थकों के साथ भाजपा की सदस्यता ग्रहण की है। बालौती ने आरोप लगाया कि कि करौली में एक वर्ग विशेष को सरकार का आशीर्वाद मिला हुआ है। हालात यह है कि कोई जय श्रीराम के नारे बोलना चाहता है तो उसे सरकार की अनुमति की जरूरत है। सरकार बहुसंख्यकों की अनदेखी कर रही है। उन्होंने कहा कि करौली की घटना से दुखी होकर भाजपा की सदस्यता ग्रहण की है इस मौके पर पूनिया ने कहा कि हम लोग करौली अशांति फैलाने नहीं गए थे, लेकिन हमें रोक लिया गया। लोगों से मिलने नहीं दिया गया।

हंसराज बालौती ने खुद ट्विटर पर ट्वीट करके जानकारी दी है।

आज #डॉ_भीमराव_अंबेडकर_जयंती के शुभ अवसर पर @BJP4Rajasthan की सदस्यता राजस्थान प्रदेश अध्यक्ष @DrSatishPoonia ने भाजपा का दुपट्टा पहनाकर ग्रहण करवाई। इस मौके पर प्रदेश उपाध्यक्ष @MukeshDhadhichj,प्रदेश महामंत्री एवं विधायक @madandilawar आदि उपस्थित रहे। @chshekharbjp @BJP4India pic.twitter.com/qrq0RkR6fX— Er Hansraj Baloti (@ErHansrajMeena) April 14, 2022

क्या हमले में पुलिस शामिल है ?
इसका जवाब हाँ मे रहे तो सही ही रहेगा क्योकिं जो वीडियो सोशल मीडिया पर वायरल हुआ उसमें दंगाईयो के साथ पुलिस भी नजर आ रही है जो मूकदर्शक बनकर देखती रही है लेकिन दंगाईयो पर कोई कार्यवाही तुरंत नही की।

पहले से थी हमले की साजिश:
दैनिक भास्कर के दो रिपोर्टरो ने हमले के बाद क्षेत्र की पडताल की जिसमे छत पर पत्थर पाये गये और भीड पर तलवार लाठियो से हमला कर दिया गया।

हिन्दू कर रहे पलायन: दो अप्रैल को हिंदू संगठनों की बाइक रैली पर हुए पथराव के बाद स्थिति तनावपूर्ण है। इस बीच मुस्लिम बहुल इलाकों से हिंदू अपने घर और दुकान बेचकर दूसरी जगह पलायन कर रहे हैं। दो घरों और कुछ दुकानों पर तो मुसलमानों ने कब्जा कर लिया है। वहीं, कई जगह हिंदूओ ने घरों और दुकानों के बाहर ‘संपत्ति बिकाऊ’ के बोर्ड लगा दिए हैं एक वरिष्ठ आइपीएस अधिकारी ने कहा कि पिछले एक सप्ताह में लोग अपना घर और दुकान छोड़कर या तो करौली में ही दूसरी जगह रहने लगे हैं या फिर ताला लगाकर दूसरी जगह चले गए हैं। इन लोगों को वापस लाने के प्रयास किए जा रहे हैं। पलायन करने वालों में जाटव, खटीक, धोबी और कुमावत समाज के लोग शामिल हैं।
डां किरोडीलाल मीना ने 195 लोगों की सूची राजस्थान सरकार को सौपी थी जो पलायन कर चुके थे।