Barring a few exceptions, the Hindu-Muslim relation in India has been like “East is East and West is West, and never the twain shall meet”. The much publicized ‘Ganga-Jamuni Tehzib’ represents a working relationship between the two communities only. The slogan of ‘Hindu-Muslim bhai bhai’ is as fraud as ‘Hindi-Chini bhai bhai’. M K Gandhi, who worsened the Hindu-Muslim relation in India between 1920 and 1948, by his obsessive love for Muslims, was clueless that his propaganda of “Ishwara Allah Tero Naam” was ‘Shirk’ in Islam. ‘Shirk’ is associating any other entity with Allah and under Islam it is a crime punishable by death (Wajb-ul-Qtl). So, understanding Islam and Muslim was never an easy task for Hindus.
UK based writer and journalist Aatish Taseer called Narendra Modi, the present Prime Minister of India, ‘Divider-in-Chief’ some years back. He was trying to drive home the Left-Liberal-Islamist narrative that Modi has divided Indians into Hindus and Muslims to put the later minority community in disadvantageous position. But he forgot that his Prophet was the original Divider-in-Chief, who divided all the humans into ‘Momin’ and ‘Kafir’ for all time to come. As per Islam, Kafir are sub-humans and hell goers and deserved to be force-converted, or killed or kept as ‘Dhimmi’. Aatish Taseer overlooked the inherent Islamic culture of ‘exclusiveness’ of faith, as well as, ‘violence’ and ‘dominance’ over Kafir that has been the root cause of all problems of his cohort in modern India.
There are 57 Muslim majority countries in the world, where Islam is the state religion. None of these countries allow equal treatment and opportunity to its religious minorities. Governments of these countries support Islamism directly or indirectly and persecute religious minorities actively or passively. Such discrimination with religious minorities is then sanctified by Islamic teachings. But the countries where Muslims are in minority, they demand safeguard and pampering from majority community. They demand that such countries should be ‘Secular’ and allow them to practice and propagate their Islam unabated. They demand and practice their ‘personal civil laws’ at the cost of uniform laws for all citizens, and in worst cases, they even demand ‘Sharia’ in those countries.
In country like India, where vote oriented ‘secular democracy’ prevails, Muslims are allowed to infiltrate and manipulate the so called secular political parties in favour of former’s socio-religious hegemony. The likes of Congress, Communist, SP, BSP, RJD, TMC and AAP have been such Indian political parties. Strictly speaking, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan was not the creator of “Muslims are separate nation”. It has been the teaching of Islam since 1300 years in form of ‘Dar al-Islam’ and ‘Dar al-Harb’. Another inherent problem of Muslims is their extra-national allegiance. Dr B R Ambedkar’s observation on Indian Muslims on that count is worth mentioning: “The second defect of Islam is that it is a system of social self-government and is incompatible with local self-government, because the allegiance of a Muslim does not rest on his domicile in the country which is his but on the faith to which he belongs”.
Such dogma is ingrained in the minds of Muslims through their compulsory religious teaching in the childhood. In Hinduism, there is nothing like religious teaching in childhood. This makes a major difference in upbringing of Muslim and Hindu children. Islam teaches that sovereignty rests with Allah alone. In Islam, a Khalifa is the successor of Muhammad to rule over Muslim community/Muslim world. This was the reason as to why all major Muslim rulers of India routinely expressed their allegiance to the Khalifas of that time. But with abolition of Khilafat in 1924, Indian Muslims started facing a vacuum.
The Khilafat Movement, launched by Indian Muslims during 1920, led to large scale communal violence against Hindus of Malabar region, known as Mopla Riots. Invitation was sent by Indian Khilafat leaders to Aamir of Afghanistan to invade ‘Dar al-Harb’ India. There was also migration from Dar al-Harb India by many thousands of Muslims to ‘Dar al-Islam’ Afghanistan. M K Gandhi, unwittingly, dragged the Indian Hindus to support Khilafat Movement to satisfy his obsessive love for Muslim. However, Gandhi was cut into size when prominent Khilafat leader Maulana Mohammed Ali said, “Yes, according to my religion and creed, I do hold an adulterous and a fallen Mussalman to be better than Mr. Gandhi”.
Today though no Khilafat exists, its presence at psychological level exists very much among all Muslims, including those of India. Muslims eagerly look at a future Khilafat. Meanwhile, they keep on practicing brotherhood among Muslims all over the world as religious obligation. This brotherhood of Muslims was aptly described by Dr Ambedkar: “The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is the brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity.”
At the terminal period of Mughal rule, Hindu Marathas conquered large part of North India. The Rohilla Afghan chiefs of north India, led by Najib–ud-Daulah, invited Ahmad Shah Abdali (Aamir of Afghanistan) to launch Jihad against Hindu Marathas of India. Abdali invaded India multiple times between 1747 and 1769 and plundered North India.
Muslims have also been practicing ‘heads I win, tails you lose’ policy in India. As an example, if a Hindu boy wants to marry a Muslim girl, he has to convert to Islam. Again if a Hindu girl wants to marry a Muslim boy, she too has to convert to Islam. In the words of Dr Ambedkar, “But Hindus are right when they say that it is not possible to establish social contact between Hindus and Muslims, because such contact can only mean contact between women from one side (Hindus) and men from the other (Muslims)”.
The “Hindu Raj” issue of today’s Indian Muslims is nothing new, as the Left-Liberal-Islamist cabal of India wants to put it now. It was very much alive in 1940s too. Dr Ambedkar observed, “The Muslims are howling against the Hindu Mahasabha and its slogan of Hindudom and Hindu Raj. But who is responsible for this? Hindu Mahasabha and Hindu Raj are the inescapable nemesis which the Musalmans have brought upon themselves by having a Muslim League. It is action and counter-action. One gives rise to the other”. India may not have pan-country Muslim League Party now, but the same mind set prevails among Indian Muslims even today. Now they have BJP, in place of Hindu Mahasabha, to cry against. Their cry gets strength from the support of so called secular parties like Congress, Communist, SP, BSP, RJD, TMC, AAP and Left-Liberal-Islamist gang, which is basically comprised of anarchists and intellectual Jihadis. That is why Indian Muslims publicly cry “Pakistan Zindabad” anywhere in India at the drop of hat.
Majority of Indian Muslims are converts. However, the ‘Casteless Muslims’ have been practicing a virtual caste system in South Asia. At the top of the ladder is ‘Ashraf’ (descendants of Arab, Persian, Turk, Afghan, Mughal Muslims and high caste Hindu converts) followed by ‘Ajlaf’ (non-Dalit low caste Hindu converts) and ‘Arjal’ (Dalit Hindu converts). Approximately 15% of Indian Muslims are Ashraf. So long minority Muslims ruled India, there was no problem. With the advent of British and following the failed mutiny of 1857, Ashraf Muslims of India (who constituted the Muslim ruling class) became restless. They dragged Ajlaf and Arjal Muslims in that ‘restlessness’ and by the beginning of 20th century Indian Muslims asserted themselves gradually as a distinctly separate entity which culminated into creation of Pakistan in 1947. In that effort, their mosques and religious leaders/preachers also played a very important role. Muslims were then about 25% of British India’s population.
It is to be noted here that Muslims of Bengal, Bihar, United Province, Delhi, Bombay, Madras and Central Province played the major role in creation of Pakistan. But after August 1947, most of them did not migrate to Pakistan and stayed back in independent India. Congress, which was a ‘Hindu Party’ to Muslims before August 1947, gave them assurance of safety in India. And Indian Muslims developed a façade of secularism around them. With passage of time their population increased from 8% in 1951 to 18% now and their restlessness has come back again. Democracy, Constitution and Secularism are antitheses of Islam. However, Indian Muslims now cry for those in melodramatic fashions, but in actual want more ‘Islamic pound of flesh’ from the body of India. They are not satisfied after getting Pakistan and Bangladesh. They want more and more ‘Islamic pound of flesh’ from India. Open support for recent (August 2021) Taliban takeover of Afghanistan by Indian Muslims in Social Media is reflective of their true mindset.
While Hindus never invaded any outside country, invasion of other countries and destruction of indigenous civilizations have been the basis of spread of Islam. As per UNESCO, there were 46 ancient civilizations in the world, of which all have perished except Hinduism. India is the unfinished job for Indian Muslims to be conquered through their much cherished “Ghazwa-e-Hind”.
So, at the end of the day, it is now Islamic attack from within India, with supports from Indian Left-Liberal intellectual terrorists and foreign countries, against the great and only living ancient civilization of Hindu India. In coming decades Indian Muslims will keep on demanding more and more of ‘Islamic pound of flesh’ from India. West Bengal, Assam and Kerala have already shown demographic shift and political consequences in their favour. Country-wise, India has second largest Muslim population (about 250 millions) in the world and this figure is really worrying.
