Wednesday, November 25, 2020
Home Reports The BJP’s loss in Jharkhand elections is its own making

The BJP’s loss in Jharkhand elections is its own making

Also Read

G Indira
Author of the book: The India I Know and of Hinduism. Publications in -charge Pragna Bharati Organisation, Hyderabad. Academician and free-lancer

The BJP, of late, has lost two states one bigger and vital state- Maharashtra and one smaller state but significantly important one (that has been loyal to the party all along) – Jharkhand. Both happened at the fag-end of the year 2019, though the year started with a thundering note of the resounding BJP victory in general elections April-2019 with the capable, unmatchable leader Shri Modi at the helm. The BJP even at the year-end, basking on the glory of their victory at Centre, forgetting that states will have their own regional parties with regional aspirations and to compete with them, the BJP needed to tie up/make alliances with them. Like Abhimanyu of Mahabharata, it went alone and was seized by the opposition JMM-Congress’s trap.

Winning elections, depends purely on arithmetic (of the allies), and sometimes it’s on the chemistry of those partners also. Going solo, is the biggest reason for the debacle in Jharkhand for the BJP. Without calculating the arithmetic, the party went minus its (earlier) alliance partners: All Jharkhand Students’ Union (AJSU) and Babulal Marandi’s Jharkhand Vikas Morcha (JVM). Their votes would definitely have added numbers. The vote share of AJSU-8% and the BJP’S own 33% would have made a great difference. The regional party AJSU, it is said, asked for 18 seats, the BJP wanted to concede 12. They (both) could have easily got reconciled to 15, in between, as a deal. But, the BJP, it seemed, preferred to severe ties rather than to come to a common ground. Charity starts from a bigger party by accommodating the smaller one’s aspirations. It’s the law of life that magnanimity should flow from above. Now, the BJP with its bravado, crestfallen in Jharkhand. It’s a five-year loss for the party. The Congress came effortlessly, piggyback on JMM. This is what is called: ‘rubbing salt to the wound’. The Congress, no wonder learnt lessons from its earlier history, not to go alone now.

United we stand, divided we fall:
Whether the BJP likes it or not, as far as states are concerned, regional parties would definitely play a role. Instead of trying to make them irrelevant, making friendship with them and coming to power is better. Once in power, the party at the Centre, can spread its wings. Now, the JMM-CONGRESS-JDU combine, is trying to woo the other smaller parties (earlier in the BJP fold) in the Jharkhand, to their side in the formation of the government so that the BJP becomes a loner. In this fast-paced world, it’s difficult to sit in the opposition for the MLAs and raise people’s issues for five long years. On the counting day, when the BJP sensed that it was falling short of majority, it (the party) was making efforts to reach the smaller parties. Why couldn’t it do this ‘reach’ before elections? For, India is a diverse country and thrives on its pluralism. Hence, the big parties like the BJP, should show their accommodative flexibility.

Success has many fathers, whereas failure is an orphan:
Now, the opposition along with secular media are blaming the BJP. The party’s move to amend Chotanagapur Tenancy Act, though the move was intended to enable the tribals, was dubbed by their opponents as conspiracy to steal tribal land. This, the BJP couldn’t negate with unity as they had inner rifts while in the ruling. The taunts of the opposition on the CAA and NRC, going against the BJP, leading to the defeat, now the BJP is silently bearing them. For all and sundry, the opposition is blaming the BJP. The BJP CM, Raghubar Das was a liability. This was pointed much before elections by many media men. That didn’t fall into the deaf years of the party.

The BJP should go back to its former tried and tested recipe:
To have a common compromise program i.e. common minimum program with its allies before fighting an election and also on vote-sharing. And to have a give and take approach with the regional players. Then, there’s a possibility of coming to power in states. The regional parties represent the regional culture and aspirations much better. People tend to vote for them (in state elections) because they articulate well in their language. All said and done, losing Shiv Sena and another five-year term in Maharashtra would not augur well for the BJP. Shiv Sena might have challenged them on many issues and might have gone against the BJP. The BJP, as a bigger party, should have addressed their concerns. There’s nothing wrong for a regional party to keep its identity. The Congress and the NCP, though opposite polls of Sena in their ideology, formed government with Sena to get the power in the state. They are also allowing Sena to have its say on Hindutva so that it (the Sena) would cut the votes of the BJP (later if there are any elections) for the combine (NCP- Congress) to win. Uddhav Thackeray, CM Maharashtra, is time and again stating that he would not leave Hindutva ideology.

All in all, the main point is: why is the BJP (in its new avatar post-2019 parliament elections) having a tiff with smaller parties in stitching alliances and why it has not been able to be inclusive and accommodative with them? By this way of fight, it’s losing national picture that’s always projected TVs. If you look at history, victory almost invariably went to those who co-operated better. Rome conquered Greece, not because Romans are intelligent but because they are able to co-operate more effectively. The BJP should be sensitive to opinions and strengths of its allies in the long run.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

G Indira
Author of the book: The India I Know and of Hinduism. Publications in -charge Pragna Bharati Organisation, Hyderabad. Academician and free-lancer

Latest News

Life ends, Maggie goes on

What explains this phenomenon that has made its place into the Indian food culture that was earlier obsessed with fresh milk and wheat procured from the local farm? Maggie has so seamlessly transited from Switzerland to India.

Joshua Project and the need for an anti-conversion law

The precise planning, the in-depth study of various ethnic groups, the economics of these people, and their belief system by Christian missionaries is a thing to worry about.

China’s BRI- Post pandemic implications

The poverty and other issues made the countries sign the deal immediately but the BRI’s China-centric approach was soon uncovered when the infrastructure projects gave rise to corruption, volatility in the economy, a rise in favoritism, and destructive ecological effects.

अस्थिर और बौखलाए पाकिस्तान का विधुर विलाप

बीते सप्ताह पाकिस्तान के विदेश मंत्री शाह महमूद कुरैशी एवं आईएसपीआर के डायरेक्टर जनरल बाबर इफ्तिखार ने एक प्रेस वार्ता के दौरान भारत पर तंज कसते हुए यह आरोप लगाया के भारत, पाकिस्तान को अस्थिर करने की मंशा रखने के क्षेत्र में कार्य कर रहा है। यह वैसा ही है जैसा फिल्म वेलकम में उदय भाई का कहना कि मजनूं उनकी एक्टिंग स्किल्स से जलता है।

प्लास्टिक एक घातक हथियार

क्या आपने कभी प्लास्टिक प्रदूषण के नकारात्मक प्रभावों के बारे में सोचा है कि हम अपने स्वास्थ्य और पर्यावरण पर दिन-प्रतिदिन बढ़ रहे हैं?

A deliberate attempt of Varanasi

A city beyond imagination, a city where India starts and ends. A city of magical moments and experience of life.

Recently Popular

गुप्त काल को स्वर्ण युग क्यों कहा जाता है

एक सफल शासन की नींव समुद्रगप्त ने अपने शासनकाल में ही रख दी थी इसीलिए गुप्त सम्राटों का शासन अत्यधिक सफल रहा। साम्राज्य की दृढ़ता शांति और नागरिकों की उन्नति इसके प्रमाण थे।

5 Cases where True Indology exposed Audrey Truschke

Her claims have been busted, but she continues to peddle her agenda

Hindus in danger- Fact or fiction?

Isn't it downright comical that a whole ethnic race was artificially made extincted from a place where they reside just because they were Hindus, a cop was lynched because he just had a name tag of "PANDITH", sadhus were lynched well because they were sadhus, a guru/mystic is mocked by a commie-dian on a case which was settled by the court of law, a lieutenant colonel was put behind bars without trial but a filmmaker wants the Hindus to kneel down because of the atrocities.

The story of Lord Jagannath and Krishna’s heart

But do we really know the significance of this temple and the story behind the incomplete idols of Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra and Maa Shubhadra?

वर्ण व्यवस्था और जाति व्यवस्था के मध्य अंतर और हमारे इतिहास के साथ किया गया खिलवाड़

वास्तव में सनातन में जिस वर्ण व्यवस्था की परिकल्पना की गई उसी वर्ण व्यवस्था को छिन्न भिन्न करके समाज में जाति व्यवस्था को स्थापित कर दिया गया। समस्या यह है कि आज वर्ण और जाति को एक समान माना जाता है जिससे समस्या लगातार बढ़ती जा रही है।