Tuesday, August 11, 2020
Home Opinions AYUSH treats the patient not disease, immigrate Vaidya to AYUSH from cross pathy

AYUSH treats the patient not disease, immigrate Vaidya to AYUSH from cross pathy

Also Read

 

Unlike modern allopathic system of medicine which diagnoses and treats the disease in particular, AYUSH believes in treating the patient as a whole and that is how it offers the paramedical, wellness based care and healing touch to the patient. India has always grown, developed and advanced in the health sector by including the holistic values by giving utmost importance to the patient than treating the disease in isolation. That is why AYUSH has faith, divine spirit, moral codes, self- discipline etc., than science and experimental proof. The science of AYUSH is different from modern science that rules the world. The science of AYUSH is faith based, i.e., the patient and his/her family members also must believe and trust the Vaidya unconditionally and all of them must follow the instructions of the Vaidya without doubting or questioning.

The divine cord and not the scientific proof that link the Vaidya with the patient. AYUSH so profusely mandate the Vaidya also to follow strict discipline, show high level of honesty and stick to their wisdom and not to breach or pretend as a scholar. But the situation today is totally different.  Most of the present day AYUSH Vaidyas in private practice are so unethical from the philosophical points of view of AYUSH and are engaged in cross pathy. They display half-baked knowledge in allopathic system, claim they are expert in modern medicine but are totally ignorant about own fundamentals – Tridosha method of diagnosis.

Even these days, the advanced country like UK recognizes the importance of midwives and encourages their service in rural areas where qualified doctors are not available. Further the medical care is also quite expensive where the service of midwives is quite affordable. Similarly the treatment of a disease by allopathic system is quite expensive whereas the patient care by AYUSH vaidya is quite affordable as AYUSH is a paramedical wellness centric system that offers healing to the mind as well.

If adequate importance is given to the paramedical wellness based therapy system of AYUSH and AYUSH is promoted for holistic paramedical benefits, certainly India can even prevent the episode of several diseases. The service of AYUSH can be promoted in different parts of India for creating health and hygiene awareness, diet regiments to be followed during different seasons, importance of health moral and health disciple etc. Cross pathy by several AYUSH vaidya in private practice is really destroying the mission of Ministry of AYUSH. Need of the day is patient care and not just treatment of the disease. India has huge burden of chronic, non-communicable diseases both in urban and rural areas. When the treatment leading to total cure is impossible, the importance must be on patient care which is not the subject of allopathic system of medicine. The abundant AYUSH viadyas in private practice can be judiciously used for patient care, wellness and counselling to all those patients who suffer from various chronic ailments.

It looks like we are wasting the rich tributes of AYUSH by allowing cross pathy to happen instead of converting all those AYUSH vaidyas who are engaged in cross pathy in their private practice to promote AYUSH. Once they recognise the importance of patient care certainly they all will immigrate back to AYUSH practice. The stupendous contributions of AYUSH to humanity should not be lost due to cross pathy by several AYUSH vaidya in private practice.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Latest News

राम मंदिर और भारतीय संस्कृति

राम मंदिर का निर्माण भारतीय संस्कृति की रक्षा एवं उत्थान की ओर बड़ी छलांग है, सदियों से विदेशी आक्रांताओं ने न केवल भारत को लूटा अपितु उसकी संस्कृति को नष्ट भ्रष्ट करने का यथासम्भव प्रयास किया।

Here’s why the idea of placing a time capsule beneath Ram temple should be taken seriously

Burying of a time capsule, if at all done, should bury the claim that Hinduism is the other face of Indian nationalism. Its time to change the narrative test Hindutva should become BJP’s achilles heel.

Ayodhya: From secular to a Hindu state

Ayodhya existed before the temple, will it cease to exist and be changed to RamJanmBhoomi or will it thrive despite the best efforts of politicians to ruin it?

Ayatollah Khamenei’s Hindi Twitter account: What is cooking?

Iran's supreme leader Ayotallah Khamenei has opened a twitter account in Hindi. This action is serious, Indian intelligence agencies and Bhartiyas must be on alert, especially since this action comes in a span of few days of the Bhumi Pujan ceremony of Shri Ram Janma Bhumi.

Why my village celebrated Diwali on 5th August

Ram Mandir has been a hot political issue since decades but should that reduce the glory of this auspicious day?

In fight between secularists and nationalists, journalism loses its purpose

It is needless to remind, in democratic system of governance, the institution of media or the profession of journalism plays one of...

Recently Popular

Are Indian history text books really biased?

Contributions of many dynasties, kings and kingdoms find no mention in our text books. Post independence history is also not adequately covered in our text books.

सामाजिक भेदभाव: कारण और निवारण

भारत में व्याप्त सामाजिक असामानता केवल एक वर्ग विशेष के साथ जिसे कि दलित कहा जाता है के साथ ही व्यापक रूप से प्रभावी है परंतु आर्थिक असमानता को केवल दलितों में ही व्याप्त नहीं माना जा सकता।

The story of Lord Jagannath and Krishna’s heart

But do we really know the significance of this temple and the story behind the incomplete idols of Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra and Maa Shubhadra?

Striking similarities between the death of Parveen Babi and Sushant Singh Rajput: A mere co-incidence or well planned murders?

Together Rhea and Bhatt’s media statements subtly and cleverly project Sushant as some kind of a nut job like Parveen Babi, another Bhatt conjuring.

Two nation theory after independence

Two Nation Theory was the basis of partition of India. Partition was accepted based on the assumption that the Muslims staying back in India because they rejected the Two Nation theory. However, later decades proved that Two Nation Theory is not only subscribed by a large section of Indian Muslims but also being nourished by the appeasement politics.
Advertisements