Wednesday, April 8, 2020
Home Media Wish Nehru had acted to Churchill's call

Wish Nehru had acted to Churchill’s call

Also Read

Sushant Sharma
Sushant Sharma works in the brand planning and strategy team for Leo Burnett Worldwide. He is an MBA from MICA (formerly, Mudra Institute of Communications, Ahmedabad). He was awarded the prestigious "top 100 young business leaders" award by CNBC TV18 and Dare2Compete. He writes research articles for Indian Management which is a management journal published by All India Management Association. https://www.linkedin.com/in/sushant-sharma-mica/

“Profit ? It’s a dirty word.”
-Jawaharlal Nehru, First Prime Minister of India

Those were indeed the words of Jawaharlal Nehru. Considerable hatred towards business and commerce later on became the nucleus of India’s lacklustre economic performance. Immediately after independence, our policy makers majorly included people who preached and practiced the communist manifesto. Just to tell, GD Birla and Jamsetji Tata who were considered as Business Maharajas of that time were not even included in the construing the future India.

In the decade of 1930s, Nehru gave pompous speeches in Europe claiming that he could see a USSR’s socialism as an utopian economy model; whereas, Japan’s capitalist model as a cannibalistic philosophy of governance. However, in the present day Japan is not only a much robust economy than USSR, but it is also one of the strongest in the world. Japan has become the “ASIAN TIGER”; on the contrary, Kremlin is firmly controlled by KGB (The Economist).

- article continues after ad - - article resumes -

The lack of foresight in choosing the correct philosophy of economic planning costed India at least a good 15 years in her history. Communism also killed the economy of West-Bengal. After independence, Bengal was endowed with clusters that made it the most preferable location for businesses in India. However, to Bengal’s misery it was also endowed with pestiferous rule of the communist party. Communist party always had the trade unions as its strong lobby group. The uneasiness and regular rifts in Bengal’s external environment drove the industries outside the state to another state (Maharashtra) that today contributes the maximum to Indian GDP.

With no efforts towards economic robustness in the periodical planning, India suffered continuous deficits in its Balance of Payment. There wasn’t anyone who was acting as if they wanted “good” for Indian Economy. To some extent there were efforts made in 1970 with the devaluation of the Indian rupee. Initial results were good as India recorded her first BOP Surplus in 1971-72. India recorded her second and last surplus in the year 1976-77. The first transformational change in Indian Economy happened in 1991, when the IMF decided to aid Indian Economy by “Aid India” consortium package. It will be unfair, if Manmohan Singh weren’t to be praised for the revolutionary change in the New Economic Policy. The former Indian Prime Minister played a masterstroke with periodic devaluation of Indian Rupee. Although, the devaluation did make exports a fascinating proposition, the government lacked institutional framework.

If you were to look at the economic model of any developed country today, it gradually phased away from primary sector towards manufacturing. However, UPA government decided to make India as an erratic economy. Without any rationale, we decided to become a service economy. Basically, we wanted to challenge the narrative of economic development with the only economy in the world that will gain its significance with a move from primary to the service sector. The same aberrant model followed by UPA is today taken up as case studies by top institutions for economics around the world as an asynchronous event.

India has really come out of years of poor economic planning; in fact, deplorable economic planning. Make in India is one such programme. Usually, countries need to maintain a balance in its BOP accounts. The current account is mostly in a deficit; its deficit is offset by the international forces of global financial markets. For instance, USA offsets is high deficit against China with high amount of capital investment made by people and institutions of China into financial markets of USA. However, India always lacked such a synchronised effort towards offsetting the deficits in trade. The focus of Make in India is to attract FDI from other countries into India. Therefore, if anyone tells you that Make in India is not being promoted in India is ascertaining a very important premise for the programme – Make in India needs to be advertised in international locations, but not in India. Indian government even hired Widen+ Kennedy, an American advertisement agency, to promote the lion outside India.

There has to be a sustained effort by the government towards enfranchising the economic forces in the country. Such economic liberation is clearly visible. Around the time of our independence, Winston Churchill quoted something about socialism. I wish that Nehru had acted on that quote – :

“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
– Winston Churchill, The Prime Mister of Britain at the time of India’s independence.

 

- Support OpIndia -
Support OpIndia by making a monetary contribution
Sushant Sharma
Sushant Sharma works in the brand planning and strategy team for Leo Burnett Worldwide. He is an MBA from MICA (formerly, Mudra Institute of Communications, Ahmedabad). He was awarded the prestigious "top 100 young business leaders" award by CNBC TV18 and Dare2Compete. He writes research articles for Indian Management which is a management journal published by All India Management Association. https://www.linkedin.com/in/sushant-sharma-mica/

Latest News

Scientific evidence of Astrology

In March 1951, an American radio engineer John H.Nelson discovered that there was a degradation in propagation of radio waves with respect to different position of planets and at different angles.

Savarkar’s views on Hindu Nationalism

Mr. Savarkar decided to save Hinduism and instead of spreading venom against other religions and there lies his greatness.

Is Imran Khan Prime Minister of thieves?

Tablighi Jamaat attendees infected people of India in many states. Time can only tell how much the damage is, quantifiably.

Impact of Covid-19 on Indian economy and the way forward

As with the disease that it impacts the lowest income group the most, the infected economy will also hit the unorganized sector the most.

Indian Communists need to see a MIRROR!

Communists stand as a professional failure at all the fronts where their dare to question the Nationalists and try to trap the youth of our country in their propaganda.

Can COVID-19 bring a behavioral transformation and help tackle climate change?

What has been a nightmare for the human race has been nothing less than a jackpot for the environment and other species living here and has significantly helped the planet in some ways to heal itself.

Recently Popular

The un-VICE NEWS, Article 14 and Subramanian Swamy

Pertaining a video published by Vice News as an interview of Dr. Subramanian Swamy. Analysing the dishonesty of Vice News and Dr. Subramanian Swamy's elaborated position on Article 4

Impact of Covid-19 on Indian economy and the way forward

As with the disease that it impacts the lowest income group the most, the infected economy will also hit the unorganized sector the most.

In the name of god go IPL 2020 go

BCCI is still hoping against hope-like Trump behaved a couple of weeks ago- that “It will miraculously be washed away as sun shines bright”.

Tabliqi Jamaat had all the information to cancel the Markaz: They didn’t

Lets have a look at events that happened prior to it, to get some perspective as to why the criticism of the Tabliqi Jamaat is completely justified and further action is necessary for their actions which are absolutely unforgivable.

कोरोना की भयावहता और भारतीय कानून

भारत सरकार की जैविक प्रबंधन आपदा के 2008 रिपोर्ट में कहा गया की 1897 की महामारी कानून सक्षम नहीं है एवं इसे बदलने की जरुरत है. यह कानून केंद्र को जैविक आपातकाल के दौरान ज्यादा शक्ति प्रदान नही करता.