Saturday, July 4, 2020
Home Opinions Pakistan Army: Snake bites its own master

Pakistan Army: Snake bites its own master

Also Read

Sumit Kumar
Proud Indian,Bachelor in Chemistry,right-leaning writer,interested in politics,society,cricket,international affairs,wanna-be politician and a jabra fan of Virat Kohli ! Tweet me at @SumitKu16651489

Qamar Bajwa has acceded to the most lucrative and coveted post within the establishment of Pakistan, succeeding Rahil Sharif as the Chief of Army Staff. As the nationalist Pakistanis bid adieu to their rockstar Rahil Sharif through twitter and other platforms, I try to put forward the reasons why Pakistan should lament their celebration, if not, deplore the folly of Pakistani army.

The Pakistan army extorts a disproportionate share of GDP from the national income of Pakistan and justify their inordinate expenditure by maintaining hostility with India on the LOC. The primary reason why every diplomatic effort from India to establish peace is retaliated with a terror attack is because the Pakistan army fears that any pacific and amicable environment between India and Pakistan would prove detrimental to the interests as their future budgetary cuts on the defense sector. The military would become useless and they will lose the authority that they currently wield over the domestic and foreign policies of Pakistan. Their stronghold over the Pakistan’s economy, polity and society would cease to exist. The sustained Pakistan’s hostility with India damages the Pakistan’s economy to a tremendous extent. First of all, they lose a big share of their national income to serve the luxury of Pakistan’s inefficient army, which otherwise could have been spent on the education, health, skill development and energy needs of Pakistan. Secondly, they lose the significance of their strategic location as they could have been the gateway for India to Afganistan and other Central Asian countries which would have benefit them economically and geo-politically. Post Uri attack, the anguish and public sentiments within the domestic public led to an ouster of Pakistani artists working in India putting their professional career at peril.

The ramifications of Pakistan’s Army policies are not limited to relations with India but it extends to some major security challenges that exists within the boundaries of Pakistan. The brutal crimes, murder, torture, rape and genocide by Pakistani army in the erstwhile east Bengal led to a revolt against the central authority ultimately leading to creation of Bangladesh, which in many ways is more peaceful, prosperous, tolerant, stable and developed country vis-a-vis Pakistan. But, the Army did not learnt it’s lesson and continued their policy of suppression at Balochistan which is currently the nucleus of insurgency in Pakistan vehemently seeking independence from Pakistan. The support of army to the “good terrorists” to further their malicious geo-political gains in India and Afganistan has dealt a severe blow to the security apparatus of Pakistanis. The ecosystem that nurtures, trains, arms, finances and foments terrorism as a state policy has led to the creation and bolstering of terror groups that are inimical to Pakistan itself. Incidents in 2014 at Peshawar school, in 2016 at Bacha Khan university and recently, in a mosque at Quetta reflects the fact that the snake has started to bite it’s master. While the master suffers, the distressing point is that the children and normal citizens have to lose their lives because of the fanaticism of the army, the body which is generally meant to protect people’s lives from lethal threat. Post Uri-terror attack, Pakistan has become more isolated in the South Asia and it will continue to get isolated at the international fora unless it changes it’s gears, which seems unlikely in the near future.

Unless the democratic values and civil society in Pakistan are strengthened, the people would continue to suffer. But, the problem is that even the young Pakistanis have been taught so much enmity and hostility against India in their school books to justify the legitimacy of an army state that even the educated Pakistani prefer military rule over democracy as was evident when posters were put out few months back in cities of Pakistan literally urging Rahil Shareef to do a coup. It reflects the obsession of people with military rule and their ignorance of the fact that army has done more damage to them than anyone else.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Sumit Kumar
Proud Indian,Bachelor in Chemistry,right-leaning writer,interested in politics,society,cricket,international affairs,wanna-be politician and a jabra fan of Virat Kohli ! Tweet me at @SumitKu16651489

Latest News

The era of expansionists is over

‘Narendra Modi’, has lifted the spirit of statesmanship to an entirely different level

Who is responsible: UP police martyrdom

Were the policemen sent to "arrest" Vikas Dubey trained, disciplined or organized enough to carry out such an operation? Or were they just a motley group of personnel who happened to be on duty on that fateful night?

Mamata Banerjee and her oppression politics, can she win again?

As Bengal gearing up for upcoming "Vidhan Sabha" election, parties already preparing to build their consent through online campaigns, it is probably going to be the toughest challenge against Mamata Banerjee where her oppression politics has no gain.

Is China losing an undeclared war with India?

China has been following the policy of delusion with all its neighboring countries, imposing its territorial claims that don't have the potential to escalate the war and are enough to bring embarrassment to them.

Erroneous notions of statesmanship shall prove deleterious to Indian foreign policy with regard to China

The India-U.S.-Japan-Australia quad must not remain a quad merely on paper. Further, it would be propitious to include more nations into such an alliance.

“वीरता ही शांति की पूर्व शर्त होती है, निर्बल कभी शांति स्थापित नहीं कर पाते”

प्रधानमंत्री ने कहा "शांति कभी निर्बलों द्वारा स्थापित नहीं की जा सकती" अर्थात् शांति स्थापित करने का कार्य वीरों का है। जिसके लिए उन्हें अधर्म/अराजकता/शत्रु का विनाश करना पड़ता है। हिंसा के विरुद्ध भयावह प्रतिहिंसा करनी ही पड़ती है।

Recently Popular

Why Sharad Pawar supported Modi, slammed Rahul Gandhi on China

He is trying to recreate The old Third Front in a new avatar and defeat Narendra Modi in 2024.

A requiem for unsung victim: Bengali Hindus of Bangladesh

one of the most underreported cases of persistent ethnocide in the post-colonial period had certainly been with the Bengali Hindus of East Bengal. In terms of magnitude of brutality and spread on scale of time, it has hardly had any parallel in contemporary history.

Who killed Sushant?

Initially his suicide was linked with bullying and nepotism. Rhea has been already interrogated in this case. The Mumbai police has already registered a case under professional rivalry and is investigating.

The story of Lord Jagannath and Krishna’s heart

But do we really know the significance of this temple and the story behind the incomplete idols of Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra and Maa Shubhadra?

Striking similarities between the death of Parveen Babi and Sushant Singh Rajput: A mere co-incidence or well planned murders?

Together Rhea and Bhatt’s media statements subtly and cleverly project Sushant as some kind of a nut job like Parveen Babi, another Bhatt conjuring.