Thursday, June 4, 2020
Home Opinions It is not JNU vs NIT, but Kanhaiya Kumar vs Who?

It is not JNU vs NIT, but Kanhaiya Kumar vs Who?

Also Read

 

After being denied entry in Srinagar, Anupam Kher lamented— rightfully so—why the media, which had eulogised Kanhaiya Kumar in the JNU issue, was silent on the attacks on non-Kashmiri students at NIT.

The answer is in his question itself.

Kanhaiya Kumar. The ‘5 ft. 7 inches, innocent faced’ Kanhaiya Kumar. That his family earned a meagre Rs. 3,000, his father was paralysed, his mother was an Anganwadi worker, etc., were useful add-ons, which would insulate him even from a murder.

Good or bad, beautiful or ugly, genuine or fraud—does not really matter. All that media needs is a face. Consider the recent cases.

Intolerance debate could not sustain the momentum so long as it rested on ‘attacks’ on churches. Of course it served the limited purpose of helping Arvind Kejriwal win the assembly elections. But then, it fizzled out. Barkha Dutt’s desperate attempts to ‘connect the dots’ fell flat. Why? Because it did not have a face. People judged the issue on merits. Rupa Subramanya was able to counter the motivated media coverage with facts. Even hard-core secular journalists like Sagarika Ghose had to admit— of course, much later— that the media had ‘jumped the gun on church attacks’. But the moment intolerance debate got an Ahlaq as the face, facts took a back seat. Eyewitness account that the meat was found far away from Ahlaq’s house and that that the incident might have happened out of personal grudge did not deter Nayantara Sahgal et al from surrendering their awards.

Ghulam Ali and Sudheendra Kulkarni are other faces that etched the intolerance issue permanently in the collective memory of the nation.

 

Let us move to another issue: crime against women. Media’s frenzy for a face forced it to report Jasleen Kaur’s story and Rohtak sisters’ version as gospel truth. It is a different matter that these cases ended up embarrassing the media finally. But who cares about embarrassment these days in media? All that matters is ‘eyeballs’ which the media gets in plenty with a face. Suppose the media does a story on the crime against women by interviewing assorted women from faraway villages in UP and Bihar. Who would watch the documentary?

So, it is a face which makes a documentary into a story.

Consider the anti-Anti-corruption agitation of 2011. The agitation, by itself, would not have taken off if it had not been for the faces of Anna and Arvind Kejriwal. That the movement eventually fizzled out and burdened the country with a liability in the form of Arvind Kejriwal is a collateral damage. But the media got what it wanted—eyeballs.

 

Now come to the NIT issue. Kashmiri Muslim students celebrated India’s defeat in the ICC 20 World Cup tournament on March 31st. Non Kashmiri Hindu students objected to it and were promptly beaten up. What did the non Kashmiri students do next? ‘Undaunted by the physical hurt’ they hoisted the national flag and chanted ‘Bharat Mata ki Jai.’

Here is the problem in the whole episode. Who objected to the celebrations over India’s defeat? The faceless non Kashmiri Hindu students. Who hoisted the national flag and chanted ‘Bharat Mata ki Jai’? The same faceless non Kashmiri students. How do we expect the media to be interested?

The left liberals have been dominating media space since independence. They know how to find a face in the absence of one. Take the FTII students issue. The students objected to the appointment of Gajendra Chauhan as the Chairman of the Institute. In this story, there was no particular student leader whom the media could eulogise. Gajendra Chauhan, in spite of his ‘limited artistic abilities and dubious capabilities’ and questionable ‘creative credentials’, was not one the media would be happy making the ultimate villain of. It had to be someone better, someone more charismatic. Who else but Narendra Modi and his ‘right wing agenda.’

It is a fact that the secular, liberal journalists will have an upper hand in this game, but the right-wingers have to learn this fast. And what has been their performance so far? Pathetic. Even when they had a face like Prashant Poojary they could not generate enough outrage against the gruesome murder.

Right wing has to learn more. One Anupam Kher or Vivek Agnihotri is not enough. It needs more.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Latest News

एक मुख्यमंत्री जो भली भांति जानता है कि संकट को अवसर में किस प्रकार परिवर्तित करना है: भारत के सर्वाधिक लोकप्रिय मुख्यमंत्री के प्रयासों...

भारत के इन सेक्युलर, लिबरल और वामपंथियों को यह रास नहीं आया कि भगवा धारण करने वाला एक हिन्दू सन्यासी कैसे भारत के सबसे बड़े राज्य का प्रशासक हो सकता है। लेकिन यह हुआ।

2020 अमेरिका का सब से खराब साल बनने जा रहा है? पहले COVID-19 और फिर दंगे

America फिर से जल रहा है: आंशिक रूप से, जैसा कि हिंसा भड़कती है, पुलिस और उनके वाहनों पर हमला किया जाता...

Corona and a new breed of social media intellectuals

Opposing an individual turned into opposing betterment of your own country and countrymen.

Why peaceful borders with India pose a threat to Pakistan’s sovereignty

Although a religion may have some influence on the culture of the society as a whole but it can never disassociate an individual from the much broader way of life which defines culture. Indonesia is a great example of the above stated distinction.

आपको पता भी नहीं है और आपके मंदिरों को लूटने के षड़यंत्र रचे जा रहे हैं

मंदिर हमारी धार्मिक और आध्यात्मिक आस्था के केंद्र रहे हैं। सनातन धर्म की स्थापना में मंदिरों का योगदान सहस्त्राब्दियों से सर्वोच्च रहा है। ऐसे में हम कुछ दो चार पाखंडी वामपंथियों और विधर्मियों के हाथों अपने धार्मिक केंद्रों का नाश नहीं होने देंगे। हमें विरोध करना होगा।

Kaun jaat ho and Christian missionaries

Ugly face of Christianity, the most hypocratic religion of the world!

Recently Popular

रचनाधर्मियों को गर्भस्थ बेटी का उत्तर

जो तुम्हें अग्नि परीक्षा देती असहाय सीता दिखती है, वो मुझे प्रबल आत्मविश्वास की धनी वो योद्धा दिखाई देती है जिसने रावण के आत्मविश्वास को छलनी कर इस धरा को रावण से मुक्त कराया.

The one difference between the Congress of today and that of before 2014

For the sake of the future generations, for the sake of our children, please read more books about how Congress had been ruling the country and be aware of the dangers.

Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul was right to call out rising intolerance

The libertarians need to know free speech is not licence for hate speech. Our fundamental rights are not akin to First Amendment Rights, as in the US. There are reasonable restrictions and they have a purpose.

श्रमिकों का पलायन: अवधारणा

अंत में जब कोविड 19 के दौर में श्रमिक संकट ने कुछ दबी वास्तविकताओं से दो चार किया है. तो क्यों ना इस संकट को अवसर में बदल दिया जाए.

Entry of ‘Scientific corruption’ in Tamil Nadu politics and how to save the state

MGR and then Amma placed the politics of dynasty and family rule in Tamil Nadu to the corner but the demise of Amma has shattered the state and is pegging for a great leader to lead.