Friday, December 4, 2020
Home Opinions We need to change the way we narrate Ramayana: Here is why

We need to change the way we narrate Ramayana: Here is why

Also Read

The telecast of Ramayan on DD National and it’s record breaking TRP was a strong reconfirmation of the connection India still has with Ramayana. It was a pleasant surprise to see people respond extremely well to Ramayana even when loads of other content is available on TV as well as on OTT platforms. The telecast of the serial, however, leads to a very important question – What is Ramayana and how it needs to be told, especially to the youth of this country.

Growing up on the western coast of Maharashtra, I am well aware of the exceptional achievements of Shivaji Maharaj and have been fortunate enough to visit some of his forts and military bases. There are quite a few common factors between Shivaji Maharaj & Raja Ram – both are revered and respected by millions across the globe, both have had a big impact on the culture & traditions and thus both have a significant influence on the fabric of the society. However, there is one major difference between the two – we find Shivaji Maharaj in history textbooks, but not Lord Ram! And this difference starts right from childhood – in the way we tell stories.

The story which I vividly remember listening to as a child was when the army of Ram constructs the bridge, famously called the Ram Setu, across to Sri Lanka. The story which is often told mentions that the army of Ram wrote the name of Ram on the stones and boulders and by this mere fact alone, the stones started floating in water and thus the construction of the bridge was completed. What this story often misses is any mention of Nal and Neel – two engineers who were in Ram’s army and had planned the entire construction project. Also, what we lose in this story is that fact that ancient Indians were technologically advanced enough to build a stone bridge across the sea – an exceptional engineering marvel considering the times.

The other story which is often told is how Ram had a vanarsena and how they defeated the Lankan army. The question to ponder over is whether Vanarsena actually means ‘an army of monkeys’ or else it means something else? If yes, what? I raise this question because even today there is a community living in Sri Lanka which is called Vanavaras [1]. So there is definitely a chance that the term vanarsena meant an army of people belonging to the vanara community and not literally ‘an army of monkeys’.

Many stories of Shivaji Maharaj are narrated as well; and these stories always refer to Shivaji Maharaj as a human who achieved unbelievable feats in spite of human limitations and within the constraints of human capacities.

This anomaly needs to change. We need to identify Ramayana as history; and this can be achieved in 3 broad ways:

  1. We need to incorporate Ramayana in history textbooks based on facts and evidence which are available. The current and future youth of India are going to ask many relevant questions and we need logical & satisfying answers to ensure that Ramayana has evidence based credibility in the eyes of the youth.
  2. There is a need to build museums showcasing all artefacts and other evidence which have been unearthed relating to the Ramayana era. Ram travelled to multiple places in India during his conquest – from Ayodhya in north, Nashik in west to Rameshwaram in south India. This works as an excellent opportunity – regional museums can be set up at these locations highlighting his stay at that particular place. It will also make it easier to people staying in different parts of the country to visit at least one museum relating to Ramayana.
  3. We, the people, need to be responsible when we are narrating Ramayana to anyone. A very conscious effort has to be made to narrate Ramayana as history and not as mythology.

This redefining is necessary to ensure that the history of this country does not lose its true color and achievements and also reminds our people how capable our ancestors were. Jai Hind.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanara

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Latest News

NEP 2020: Revamping higher education and challenges ahead

Hope the government will implement NEP successfully in the higher education system and achieve all its goals in the predicted time. Thus, India will restore its role as a Vishwaguru.

Domestic violence: A grave concern

Domestic violence occurs when one person tries to dominate and control another person in a family-like or domestic relationship. Domestic violence involves...

Justin Trudeau’s unwarranted support to Farmers protests, was made on behest of Khalistani secessionists?

One has to wonder why Canadian PM has to make these unwarranted statements and the underlying aspect is, his coalition government is hanging with the support of the New Democratic Party which is a socialist far left political party and its leader is none other than Khalistani supporter Jagmeet Singh Dhaliwal.

BJP and the need for the saffron party to win GHMC

many, are making fun of this, that just to fight Owaisi brothers and the KCR, BJP had to put their full force in this election, but how many of us have realized the depth of this move by BJP?

Overview of voting trends of Muslims in Bihar election 2020

by observing the overall data, one can conclude that non-Muslim votes are divided into Muslim and non-Muslim candidates while Muslim votes are only divided among Muslim candidates.

Are the phrases “Brahmin left and Brahmin bailout”, a rhetoric of anti-semitism on Brahmin community?

The term Brahmin Left is a new phrase being used by Progressive left to showcase Brahmin community of India. It is not new that Brahmins community is often dragged in western media to malign them in a derogatory way.

Recently Popular

गुप्त काल को स्वर्ण युग क्यों कहा जाता है

एक सफल शासन की नींव समुद्रगप्त ने अपने शासनकाल में ही रख दी थी इसीलिए गुप्त सम्राटों का शासन अत्यधिक सफल रहा। साम्राज्य की दृढ़ता शांति और नागरिकों की उन्नति इसके प्रमाण थे।

Did this abusive journalist do a ‘fake interview’ while with Hindustan Times?

According to allegations, Swati Chaturvedi published a fake interview with George Fernandes.

सामाजिक भेदभाव: कारण और निवारण

भारत में व्याप्त सामाजिक असामानता केवल एक वर्ग विशेष के साथ जिसे कि दलित कहा जाता है के साथ ही व्यापक रूप से प्रभावी है परंतु आर्थिक असमानता को केवल दलितों में ही व्याप्त नहीं माना जा सकता।

वर्ण व्यवस्था और जाति व्यवस्था के मध्य अंतर और हमारे इतिहास के साथ किया गया खिलवाड़

वास्तव में सनातन में जिस वर्ण व्यवस्था की परिकल्पना की गई उसी वर्ण व्यवस्था को छिन्न भिन्न करके समाज में जाति व्यवस्था को स्थापित कर दिया गया। समस्या यह है कि आज वर्ण और जाति को एक समान माना जाता है जिससे समस्या लगातार बढ़ती जा रही है।

Pt Deen Dayal Upadhyaya and Integral Humanism

According to Upadhyaya, the primary concern in India must be to develop an indigenous economic model that puts the human being at centre stage.