Apparently the New York Times is not limited to anti-Conservative, Hinduphobic and India Bashing, another “jewel in the crown” is being an anti-Semite supporter and a Jewish hater!
New York Times Opinion Editor Bari Weiss announced her resignation on Tuesday 7/14/2020, denouncing the newspaper’s workplace culture as “hostile” for staffers who hold anything other than far left and twitter-verse ideologies.
In her resignation letter Weiss alleged the Times do not understand fellow Americans who have a difference of opinion, she mentions “the lessons that ought to have followed the election—lessons about the importance of understanding other Americans, the necessity of resisting tribalism, and the centrality of the free exchange of ideas to a democratic society—have not been learned. Instead, a new consensus has emerged in the press, but perhaps especially at this paper:”
She also writes “Twitter is not on the masthead of The New York Times. But Twitter has become its ultimate editor. As the ethics and mores of that platform have become those of the paper” The letter also states “Stories are chosen and told in a way to satisfy the narrowest of audiences, rather than to allow a curious public to read about the world and then draw their own conclusions.”
Journalism is about diverse opinions and free speech. However, The Times has become a platform of peddling predetermined narratives; proved by Weiss’ points, as she states “I was always taught that journalists were charged with writing the first rough draft of history. Now, history itself is one more ephemeral thing molded to fit the needs of a predetermined narrative.”
Weiss accuses her colleagues at the New York Times of bullying her for her Pro-Jewish views and anyone supporting her were given a cold shoulder. As per Weiss “My own forays into Wrongthink have made me the subject of constant bullying by colleagues who disagree with my views. They have called me a Nazi and a racist; I have learned to brush off comments about how I’m ‘writing about the Jews again.’ Several colleagues perceived to be friendly with me were badgered by coworkers.”
Times support for anti-Semites was further exposed by Weiss as she claims “there is still none appended to Cheryl Strayed’s fawning interview with the writer Alice Walker, a proud anti-Semite who believes in lizard Illuminati.”
All these details strongly support and prove the Times, which camouflaged as “liberal” but apparently is an anti-Semitic, as well.
Weiss has charged the Times and co-workers with discriminating and attacking her for having a difference of opinion with no action taken against these employees by claiming “New York Times employees publicly smear me as a liar and a bigot on Twitter with no fear that harassing me will be met with appropriate action. They never are. There are terms for all of this: unlawful discrimination, hostile work environment, and constructive discharge. I’m no legal expert. But I know that this is wrong.”
New York Times is a biased and one-sided platform with no space for the difference of opinion expresses Weiss by saying “What rules that remain at The Times are applied with extreme selectivity. If a person’s ideology is in keeping with the new orthodoxy, they and their work remain unscrutinized” and also “Online venom is excused so long as it is directed at the proper targets. Op-eds that would have easily been published just two years ago would now get an editor or a writer in serious trouble, if not fired.”
Times dictatorial supremacist model does not stop here. They run their authoritarian “media” platform by forced brainwashing of the youth could perhaps be seen in Weiss’s resignation letter in which emphasizes on the fact by stating the rules of young writers and editors have to follow The Times Rules “Rule One: Speak your mind at your own peril. Rule Two: Never risk commissioning a story that goes against the narrative. Rule Three: Never believe an editor or publisher who urges you to go against the grain.”
Weiss also adds “For these young writers and editors, there is one consolation. As places like The Times and other once-great journalistic institutions betray their standards and lose sight of their principles.”
This is the prime example of how “the liberal” media platform is run which hypocritically blames the difference of opinions as authoritarian and fascist. There are several honest journalists whose careers are targeted and destroyed in a similar fashion just for having a difference of opinion and religious belief.
If the New York Times could viciously attract a Jewish Journalist in a remorseless fashion, in a multi-cultured Jewish hub like New York City, we cannot even imagine what would this chronic Hindu bashing, India-Hating “newspaper,” like the New York Times do to a proud Hindu Journalist!
Please follow @Induslens on Twitter!
