Saturday, June 6, 2020
Home Opinions Can telecasting Ramayan during the corona times be a govt priority? Answer is an...

Can telecasting Ramayan during the corona times be a govt priority? Answer is an emphatic ‘YES’

Also Read

 

How to look at the government’s decision to telecast ‘Ramayana’ serial? There were numerous suggestions on Twitter urging Govt in this regard. On the other hand, soon after this announcement was made, the pseudo secular lobby in the country has begun to condemn it as an act of misplaced priority, at a time. When, it says, the whole country has been bogged down with the Corona pandemic and countrywide lockdown. Let us briefly examine the pros and cons of the decision.  

The whole society cutting across classes is inside home. While the high and middle-income groups do not have financial problems to spend 3 weeks at home, there were grave anxieties about the poor. The government announced a 1,70,000 crore package which sought to address their needs through free or heavily subsidized food stuff and cash grants by way of Direct Benefit Transfer or DBT.

The real problem today for 1.30 billion people is to stay inside home. It is a grave challenge and could be very painful. At the same time, every citizen can do a national service simply by staying inside four walls of his or her home.

In such a piquant situation, this popular serial can render an invaluable service by encouraging people to survive the ordeal of home confinement willingly, cheerfully and with a positive state of mind. If this helps in any way in preventing the spread of the dreaded Coronavirus in India, it will serve as an unprecedented and unique experiment before the whole humanity.

The viewing is not mandatory. There can be no argument that it has been imposed. Why Doordarshan? Because even the poor families can afford to see it as much as others can. The incorrigible pseudo-seculars who see conspiracy in everything and may strive hard to discourage small sections from viewing it, can frustrate this noble attempt as vast majority of Indians may, in any case, stay put at home and thus contribute to a national cause.

There are some suggestions to the government, though. Ramayana has 78 episodes each of 45 minutes duration. It can be telecast over 4 hours in a scattered manner over morning (9AM), afternoon (1 PM), evening (5 PM) and night (9 PM) so that the programme may see India through the critical period of next 20 days at the rate of 4 episodes per day. The mass viewing may additionally impart a spirit of solidarity in the nation and that may be helpful in facing new challenges thrown by COVID 19, if any, unitedly. One more suggestion. Doordarshan may at the start of every episode urge viewers to sit keeping minimum specified physical distance from each other. This message can be reinforced at every interval and at the end so that this habit gets transformed.

 

At no other juncture of history of modern history such an opportunity was available to the government of any country to leverage the rich civilisational legacy to meet one of the most severe scourges keeping the morale of the people high. The government needs to go ahead and begin the telecast forthwith without caring for criticisms of the die-hard critics, who will criticise, all its action, any way!     

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Latest News

हिन्द उवाच

है लहू मिला जिस मिट्टी में, बिस्मिल, अशफ़ाक़, भगतसिंह का। जिसको स्वेदों से सींचा है, गाँधी और लाल बहादुर ने।

From a porcupine to a tiger – Advent of Modi sarkar

The Modi government has established a brand India, enveloping components of economy, diplomacy, revival of foreign affairs and a clean-up of corrupt-ridden governance of the past; dispensed from an establishment with little obligation to coalition partners that enjoys mandate and confidence of the citizenry of India

Has social service become a way of conversion?

Christian Missionaries blackmail vulnerable people to choose between being able to follow their traditions and being able to feed their family. In desperate times, many people convert.

Tiananmen massacre to communist attacks on Indian people: A saga of hate, hypocrisy and violence

Tiananmen remains one of the most sensitive and taboo subjects in China today, banned from both academic and popular realms.

George Floyd and India

Ashok Swain, who is a professor in Sweden’s Uppsala’s University was upset that such protest doesn’t happen in India, so did another ‘journalist’ Rana Ayyub. Instead of showing solidarity with a man who lost his life, these opportunists are provoking vandalism and mayhem in India too.

बौद्ध मत की वो बातें, जो बताई नहीं जाती

कोई कॉमरेड और नवबौद्ध आपको देवराज इंद्र से जुड़ी हुई ये बातें नहीं बताएगा. वास्तविकता तो यह है कि बौद्ध ग्रंथों में देवराज इंद्र का उतना ही वर्णन है, जितना हिन्दू ग्रंथों में मिलता है.

Recently Popular

रचनाधर्मियों को गर्भस्थ बेटी का उत्तर

जो तुम्हें अग्नि परीक्षा देती असहाय सीता दिखती है, वो मुझे प्रबल आत्मविश्वास की धनी वो योद्धा दिखाई देती है जिसने रावण के आत्मविश्वास को छलनी कर इस धरा को रावण से मुक्त कराया.

Easing lockdown a gamble?

If we want to compare economic condition and job loss due to lockdown and blame the govt., we ought to compare the mortality rate too, which one of the lowest in the world at around 2.83%!

The journey of anti-CAA virus in the U.S.: A tale of three cities

Kshama Sawant, a Hindu immigrant embraces Hindu phobic ideology and lead an anti-India campaign to seek a stage for her future political dreams.

भारत-चीन पर राहुल का सवाल

भारत ही नेहरू के नेतृत्व में पहला गैर साम्यवादी जनतांत्रिक राज्य था जिसने जनवादी कम्युनिस्ट चीन को मान्यता प्रदान की. नेहरू उस दौर में चीन को लेकर इतने रोमांटिक (कल्पनावादी) हो गए थे कि तिब्बत पर चीन का आधिपत्य स्वीकार कर लिया. पर जब 1962 में चीन ने भारत पर हमला किया तो नेहरू की विदेश नीति चौपट हो गई थी.

Corona and a new breed of social media intellectuals

Opposing an individual turned into opposing betterment of your own country and countrymen.