Monday, April 6, 2020
Home Reports Eliminating the power of the corrupt

Eliminating the power of the corrupt

Also Read

If anyone is given absolute power over certain things, then it is bound to result in corruption. For example: If an officer in the VAT department (now subsumed within GST), is given the power to settle a case, then the officer over there is most likely to become corrupt. If the police station, has exclusive power to register an FIR, then the police station is very likely to make a very good amount of money. The reason being, to develop systems that create “checks and balances”, on processes that give exclusive authority to any individual, are cumbersome and easily fallible. The below can work wonders, to resolve this:

There can be 2 methods to resolve this:

(1) Method 1:

- article continues after ad - - article resumes -

Lets consider tax scrutiny. It is being planned to shift most of the scrutiny online. This is very good. However, even if some of the scrutiny were to happen offline, that scrutiny will become a source of corruption. This is because the one doing the scrutiny has an exclusive interaction with the one being scrutinized, with the power to settle the case, and the opportunity to make some easy money. Hence, if due to any reason, manual scrutiny is required, it must not be done by 1 individual. It can be done by 3 individuals, at 3 different times (each separated by 2 months). No one can predict beforehand, that for the 2nd and 3rd time, the scrutinizing person will be either corrupt or non-corrupt. Hence the attitude of settling the matter via bribes will be fraught with risks for both the involved parties, and thus be eliminated, with more people preferring to pay the required fine, which they can showcase during their 2nd and 3rd scrutiny. The absolute power given to 1 individual to decide on a matter is taken away. This will most likely be very effective in eliminating corruption.

(2) Method 2:

Long time back, the software systems had realized the power of APIs. When one system needs to interact with another system, there are 2 methods:
(1) Create a specific communication protocol between the 2 systems.
(2) Let there be a common generic communication protocol, through which the 2 systems can interact.

The advantages of the second method over the first one, are very well documented and thus the second method is widely used.

Lets now apply the same methodology to public interaction with government departments. So, lets create a new center, that will act as an API and temporarily call it as “Suvidha Kendra”.

Now, if any user wants to get a task accomplished, then he interacts with the “Suvidha Kendra”. The “Suvidha Kendra”, is a very lean organization, whose only task is to act as an API. It knows the list of documents required to get a task done. It takes those documents, and passes it to the relevant government department. It knows the expected response time and follows up accordingly. It can accept payments and pass on the amount to the relevant departments. Most importantly, it has no idea of the backend process required to get that task accomplished. Any central or state government department, can make any of their process compatible with “Suvidha Kendra”.

So now,
– If I require a birth certificate or a death certificate, I can just walk into a nearby Suvidha Kendra. They will give me a list of documents to submit, and inform me about the timeline. I submit the document to them, and it gives me unique request number, through which I will get all further updates. The transfer of documents is handled by them.

– If my pension is being delayed, then I can just walk into a Suvidha Kendra, and never interact with any other government department. They will handle everything for me.

– If I want to file an FIR, then I can just walk into a Suvidha Kendra, and record my statement and Aadhar verify myself. The Suvidha Kendra, passes all the information to the relevant police station.

– I need to resolve some taxation issue or claim some refund, I can just walk into a Suvidha Kendra, instead of ever going to VAT department. (People who have gone there, will say why they would prefer to not go there).

– A builder wants his sanction plan cleared, he walks with his requirement to a Suvidha Kendra. (No direct government interaction).

– I need Custom Clearance, I can just go to a Suvidha Kendra.

– My passport police verification is not done or is put on hold, then I can just walk into a Suvidha Kendra.

– Any government department, wanting to get some work done from another government department, can also proceed through the Suvidha Kendra.

Suvidha Kendra will thus become a hub of knowledge, interaction and process improvement, with a very lean structure. Any government service, can make itself compatible with the Suvidha Kendra. To make it compatible, means to let the Suvidha Kendra know the API protocol which will consist of: The order to perform some steps, The documents required for each step and the expected timeline for each step. All the interactions at each step will be done by the Suvidha Kendra. Some of the interactions with the Suvidha Kendra will also be enabled online (for example, document upload against a certain unique id of user requirement).

The Suvidha Kendra can send regular SMS updates to the user. If it finds any hiccups in any step of its process for any of its API call, it will document it and devise processes to tackle it (For example: getting a required document which needs to be submitted in a process, might itself require giving some bribe, and thus the Suvidha Kendra will recommend improvement in this very process). Suvidha Kendra will therefore become a hub of knowledge. It will lead to improvement in the government services with every recommendation of processes improvement in the Suvidha Kendra. (Very similar to API Versioning V1, V2, V3.. etc). Being a lean organization, will make it possible to outsource its management to the private sector.

We now have at least 2 points of interaction for the government service – 1 direct, and 1 via Suvidha Kendra.

There can be multiple “Suvidha Kendra” in a single city. So it is not mandatory to interact with any specific center to get the work done. These centers, by their very structure, will be very efficient, and have a very lean structure. Thus if a government process become applicable in one Suvidha Center, then it will get replicated in all the Suvidha Centers throughout the country, thereby giving them the ability to handle these processes.

The Suvidha Kendra is not restricted to processes of only the state government. It can simultaneously have processes of the state and the central government, and even the processes of other states (as it is just an exchange center). The existing online processes have many points of failure, because for some of the many steps in the online processes, these systems do require an interaction with the relevant department, which covertly aid corruption. They are a one to one interaction between the government and the end user. Suvidha Kendras can ensure that the online centers also become corruption free, by optimizing their processes in a quick time.

- Support OpIndia -
Support OpIndia by making a monetary contribution

Latest News

India’s left liberals, the perennial Muslim-appeasers, are once again up in arms against Arnab Goswami

His tough stand regarding the Tablighi Jamaat meet at Nizamuddin Markaz has therefore faced the ire of left-liberals and Islamists masqueraded as journalists alike.

Let us invoke the Dunkirk spirit and the god principle

Modi depresses liberals yet another time for 5th April event. And people with slap them with its grand success!

Do not support ‘corona terrorism’ in the name of opposing Modi, we need Uniform Civil Code

Only by enacting Uniform Civil Code, we can save India from misuse of multi-privilege in the name of secularism.

The COVID-19 cases in India are about to surge and here’s what you need to know

Despite multiple efforts carried out by the Indian govet along with medicos and police, to contain the disease in the country; they are slightly on the losing side after the immature actions by certain parts of the society.

Why Tablighi Jamaat should be under scanner

it took the stature of National Security Advisor to plead before the Maulana Saad to vacate the premises. No one ever of this stature has negotiated directly even with terrorist or in hostile conditions.

Leadership in the time of crisis

A nation needs to repose belief in its leader during the times of crisis.

Recently Popular

An irresponsible state under the responsible state

Country's minority group must understand that majority group can not be only responsible for maintaining the communal harmony in a society.

कोरोना की भयावहता और भारतीय कानून

भारत सरकार की जैविक प्रबंधन आपदा के 2008 रिपोर्ट में कहा गया की 1897 की महामारी कानून सक्षम नहीं है एवं इसे बदलने की जरुरत है. यह कानून केंद्र को जैविक आपातकाल के दौरान ज्यादा शक्ति प्रदान नही करता.

Islamic fanaticism – Beyond the ignorance of COVID 19 & a desperate need for rejecting the ideology by Muslims

Islamic fanatics often through the theological and social control of the community are trying to hard oppose the social distancing & medical help being provided to them.

How Siddharth Varadarajan, editor of The Wire, defended heinous killers and slandered victims of the Godhra carnage

Siddharth Varadarajan implied in August 2004 that the post-Godhra riots would have happened even without Godhra!

Kabul terror attack:Last nail in the coffin of anti-CAA protests?

The barbaric attack comes barely two and a half months after the vandalisation of Gurdwara Nankana Sahib, the birthplace of Guru Nanak Dev, by a violent mob in Pakistan.