Sunday, August 9, 2020
Home Opinions Learn from Liberals, don’t boycott Dangal

Learn from Liberals, don’t boycott Dangal

Also Read

varshahttp://www.varshadugar.com
Ghar se masjid hai bohot door chalo yun karlein, kisi rote hue bachche ko hansaya jaye...
 

In November 2015, Aamir Khan made the famous “intolerance” remarks that need no recall. There was widespread outrage among normal Indians, who are not all ‘right wingers’ as the media would like to project. I was one of them, and wrote this blog to express my views. I fully supported the Snapdeal downgrade, and his removal as brand ambassador of famous brands including Tata Sky and Incredible India. I have also been highly critical of Aamir’s film, PK.

However, I went to watch Dangal, loved it, and would go once again. I keep coming across Whatsapp messages, tweets and Facebook statuses that ask people to boycott the film because, “Hey, have you forgotten what he said about his country back then?”

As far as I am concerned, I have not forgotten those remarks. If he repeats such remarks, I would once again contest them and protest against them democratically. But, what is the logic behind boycotting a progressive film that delves in some extremely pertinent issues we are facing as a society? It is also a beautiful story brought to life by some amazing performances, led by Aamir himself.

There is a difference between Aamir the person, and Aamir the actor. Don’t mistake one for the other. You do not have a personal enmity with Aamir. Fight him on issues, not as a person; certainly not unconditionally.

What can be a better example of the disastrous consequences of unconditional hatred than the case of Narendra Modi? An entire army of “Liberals” has made it its life’s mission to hate this person, even if it goes against the interest of its nation (read here). They see every move, every policy, every intent of his through this prism of unconditional hatred. Nobody gains anything out of it, and national interest loses out in the end. It is important to learn from this real life analogy (Why My Vote Will Go To Modi), and not fall in the trap of myopia and faux nationalism.

If love for the nation is what made you outrage against Aamir in November 2015, buy a ticket today and watch Dangal for that same love. Because, no nation can develop and evolve if it does not recognize, nurture, reward, and value its artistes, intelligentsia, sportspersons, and the likes for their good work. Besides that, it is not just Aamir’s film; there are other actors, and hundreds of people who are associated with the film. Their efforts needs to be applauded – in the interest of the nation.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

varshahttp://www.varshadugar.com
Ghar se masjid hai bohot door chalo yun karlein, kisi rote hue bachche ko hansaya jaye...

Latest News

The history of India – a story of distortion by marxists

By interpreting history only on the basis of economic monopoly can not eradicate the wrongdoings which were done based on religion.

Democracy has stung Communism big time in Galwan

China has spoiled relations with entire neighbourhood and well beyond its capacity to manage. The fool cards like BRI, blank cheque diplomacy and the debt-traps can buy few leaders of poor countries for short-term, but turn people of these nations into long-term enemies as well.

Religious secularism

With the hypocritical standards which are followed in this country, a person is looked down upon to celebrate an historical moment in his religion.

मोदी को न राम से बड़ा बताया है और न ही जय श्रीराम का उदघोष साम्प्रदायिक है

हिन्दू धर्म में तुलसीदास और सूरदास जैसे कई कवियों ने भगवान कृष्ण और राम के लिये वात्सल्य भाव का प्रयोग किया है। आज भी वैष्णव सम्प्रदाय में भगवान की वात्सल्य भाव से पूजा की जाती है तथा उन्हें परिवार के एक बालक की तरह ही देखा जाता है।

What the Ram Temple means to a Hindu

The difference between Hindu diversity and Christian or Muslim diversity - while the latter began as one and split with differences of opinion, we began as many and came together under one blanket, while retaining individual identities – the ultimate balancing act

A change that doesn’t augur well on this Independence Day

The character of the nation is carried by its citizens. If aberration is the norm, then how do we create soldiers of character defending borders? How do we create institutions and polity without the foundation of good character?

Recently Popular

Striking similarities between the death of Parveen Babi and Sushant Singh Rajput: A mere co-incidence or well planned murders?

Together Rhea and Bhatt’s media statements subtly and cleverly project Sushant as some kind of a nut job like Parveen Babi, another Bhatt conjuring.

Curious case of Swastika

Swastika (स्वस्तिक) literally means ‘let there be good’ (su "good" and asti "let it be"), or simply ‘good it is’ implying total surrender to paramatma and acceptance of the fruits of karma.

Democracy has stung Communism big time in Galwan

China has spoiled relations with entire neighbourhood and well beyond its capacity to manage. The fool cards like BRI, blank cheque diplomacy and the debt-traps can buy few leaders of poor countries for short-term, but turn people of these nations into long-term enemies as well.

Jainism’s Rama

In Jainism re-telling of Ramayana, Rama (also known as Padma), a gentle hero, is not the one who kills Ravana. Instead, his younger brother Lakshmana kills Ravana, the king of Rakshasas, who are otherwise a civilized and vegetarian people.

What the Ram Temple means to a Hindu

The difference between Hindu diversity and Christian or Muslim diversity - while the latter began as one and split with differences of opinion, we began as many and came together under one blanket, while retaining individual identities – the ultimate balancing act
Advertisements