Nathuram Godse

ते मजहब की और धर्म की करते निंदा थे। जब टुकड़े हुए थे भारत के तब गांधी तुम भी जिंदा थे।

क्या जो 1947 में जो मिली वो आज़ादी थी या बटवारा था उस हिंदुओं के धरती का जिसे प्रभु श्री राम, चन्द्रगुप्त, नेताजी, महाराणा प्रताप, वीर सावरकर, स्वामी विवेकानन्द, स्वामी दयानन्द, जगदगुरु शंकराचार्य आदि वीरों ने महापुरुषों ने अपने बलिदान से अपने ज्ञान अपने शौर्य से अपने पराक्रम से अपने वीरता से निर्माण किया था।

Those who contend that Gandhi staying alive any further would have been detrimental to India, do not seem to have understood the problem. What harm could he have possibly inflicted upon the nation?

Someone like Dominique Lapierre and Larry Collins cannot be expected to understand the mental and emotional state of the Indian Hindus and Sikhs in 1947.

The timing of this nomenclature smack of conspiracy. If we look at the archives of then newspapers or the arguments and judgement of the court, nowhere has he been called a terrorist. Then why calling him terrorist now?

We may doubt and debate if Gandhi understood meaning of taqiyya and kitman. But his commentaries, observations and reactions during this period do indicate that he practiced these to perfection.

सिर्फ़ भारत का विभाजन करने के लिए गाँधीजी की हत्या नहीं की गयी थी, बात उससे भी काफ़ी आगे बढ़ने वाली थी जो की हमारा अस्तित्व मिटा देती!

To left liberal intelligentsia, every problem that India faces is due to Hindu terror only.

Sadhvi Pragya calling Godse a patriot: he was, is and will remain as a patriot and Kamal Hassan (actor, politician and head of a political party) calling Godse, a Hindu terrorist - both are reprehensible.

Gandhi in spite of many wrong doings  will be called a torch bearer of freedom, in the same way Godse's contribution as a freedom fighter can't be set aside.