history

It is often taught in History books that the Mughals had been the apex predators in the military history of India. This article details some of the battles fought at Delhi in which the Mughals have been a party.

In this article, I'm going to examine certain portions of Savarkar's book, 'Six Glorious Epochs of Indian History', which allegedly have contents endorsing rape of Muslim women as a political tool. How true are these claims? Did Savarkar really say something erroneous? It can be understood only after examining the text.

From inaugurating the Patita Pavana Mandir at Ratnagiri to being an active Hindutva leader who'd unify the Hindus and ask them to rise above their castes — Savarkar was everything.

The Aryan Invasion Theory had been the political tool of leftists to defame Hindus by creating rift between the imaginary Aryan and Dravidian races. Let's take some of the evidences that are in favor of Aryan Invasion theory and discuss them.

The article outlines some serious questionable actions of the C.P.I. before independence.

Sati was not at all a dominant societal custom in the Vedic era, nor did it originate from the Vedas. Other major Hindu texts, like the Dharmashastric corpus, which are post-Vedic texts, don't remotely promote Sati.

The days were indeed violent, and no right-thinking citizen would yearn for their return.

Jizya was not the only tax that Hindus had to pay. Most Oppressive was KHARAJ, which could take away up to 66% of earnings. It was a significant tax right from Akbar's time.

Part 1 of a series of articles analyzing the alleged "love jihad" phenomenon through the Islamic legal framework.

From our childhood till adult we were taught that his name was B.R Ambedkar or Babasaheb Ambedkar, but why not RAMJI? Because RAMJI didn’t fit in the narrative of those so called secular historians and parties.