Ayurveda vs Allopathy

India, in terms of medical heritage, has been blessed with glorious achievements not only in medicine and surgery but also in development of codes on medical ethics since ages.

जिनके पुर्वज महर्षि सुश्रुत निर्विवाद रूप से संपूर्ण विश्व में "शैल्य चिकित्सा" के जनक माने जाते हैं व जिन्होने संपूर्ण विश्व को आयुर्वेद का उपहार देते हुये शैल्य क्रिया की नीव रखी!

Even after creation of a separate ministry for AYUSH in 2014, the system remains clueless and direction less and is struggling for survival.

FSSAI granting licence to several herbal ingredients such as Thippili powder, Kasturi manjal and Mudakathan as food supplements being objected by some Siddha experts, seems quite bizarre.

Integrated health care approach should not be confused with permission to AYUSH vaid to prescribe certain allopathic drugs.

Government of India, especially the Ministry of AYUSH must clearly define and differentiate AYUSH from proven science by limiting and describing AYUSH as ancient traditional wisdom and not proven science.

The paramedical tag if is given to AYUSH and its role is defined well, not only we can eliminate cross pathy and medication health fraud but also we can re-invent the significance and relevance of AYUSH to our society.

Like how Ayurveda is linked with our Vedas and Sanskrit language, Siddha is linked with Tamil culture and tradition and hence the teaching of Siddha at BSMS level must be in Tamil and only then the true scholarliness of Siddha system would remain relevant and glorious.

AYUSH belongs to our tradition, culture and civilization. AYUSH came as an extension of our sacred divine practices to offer health and wellness to people.

There are several of our approaches and strategies in handling AYUSH had gone flop and turned topsy-turvy purely because the components called merit, emotion and reality we did not separate while promoting AYUSH.