chandra298

The lecture delivered by Mr. D.Y.C fits to a 'T' of a typical intellectual Liberal’s romantic fantasisation of an ideal liberalised democracy.

If nationalism did not have a worthwhile place in a polity, no country would have thought it fit to have National anthem of their own and take pride in singing it.

When protests are engineered with a diabolical motive to exploit the ignorance and sensitive mindsets of religious minorities to spread hate and violence, it ceases to be a protest of dissent and becomes a protest of deceit aimed to defile the national unity.

It is their fight for political survival, especially given that their carefully erected impregnable fortress  built over long years of crafty and deceitful political discourse to monopolize the corridors of power, has crumbled over like flimsy mud wall.

The pertinent question that needs answer is did the opposition have any real issue that would have mobilised public support around it.

Dear Swara Bhaskar, you say you are ashamed of being a Hindu, I, as a common Indian say, with all heavy heart, we are ashamed of calling you an Indian.

If the opposition only had reviewed their formula; they would have noticed that the factors in the formula had undergone tremendous change and a new counter balancing factor called Nationalism has figured in the equation in favour of the BJP.

The Pakoda stall concept of mini business model example given by the PM, to boost self employment through small and mini enterprises becomes very relevant and meaningful than NYAY which seeks to tackle poverty through legislation.