Wednesday, January 20, 2021
Home Opinions Efficiency has value in politics & sports

Efficiency has value in politics & sports

Also Read

People-pleasing has no value in politics and sports. Only efficient ones are given the chance to emerge as winners in the end. During the elections, the political party declares a candidate on the basis of the past performance. It aims at winning the seat so considerations on all aspects remain under discussion. Likewise, the selection committee chooses one cricket player solely on the basis of the overall performance. Therefore selection criterion in both the places remains similar.

If the political party bets on a sure-shot candidate, the BCCI also eyes on an efficient cricketer helpful in achieving the winning target. People-pleasing, as an expression, appears so pleasant like something we would all like to make, but it is awfully detrimental to our own links. Selecting the 15-member cricket team for the World Cup is no less difficult than securing the political party’s ticket for contesting a parliamentary seat in the general elections.

This squad is the best that can achieve the goal of winning the title, as has been stressed by veteran cricketers. The present condition is different from the year 2011 and the year 2015. The politicians apply several tactics to win over the top leaders’ hearts in their very endeavor to obtain the compulsory ticket. However, the party high command did not fail to consider the traditional criterion of the past record.

This factor also applies in the game of cricket when the team is selected for the big tournament. Only the hurt player was denied inclusion for the physical fitness remains hampered in such a case. The team selection for the ensuing World Cup in England and Wales evoked a few criticisms too. One player was injured, other player leaked enough byes and one more experienced wicket-keeper was selected for the Indian squad in the 2019 World Cup.

As the World Cup matches are scheduled to be held from May 30, this year, the selectors decided to give Dinesh Karthik a chance to play as the keeper. He was part of the country’s team that had toured England in the year 2007, 2013 and 2018 respectively. Gambhir thinks Pant had still age on his side but Karsan Ghavri, former pacer, feels 21-year-old Pant should have made to the squad. His views are shared by Ricky Ponting,  Sourav Ganguly, Virendra Sehwag, and several others.

However, the selectors discussed at length over the choice between Dinesh Karthik and Rishab Pant. The selectors were Virat Kohli & five others led by MSK Prasad, BCCI chairman of selectors. Prasad stressed that they were the biggest topic of debate in the selection meeting in Mumbai. We were in total agreement either Pant or Karthik will only come when Dhoni was injured.

Pant was supposed to have lost place because of his inability in controlling the ball as wicket-keeper in Southampton Test and conceded as many as 30 huge runs as byes. India then lost the Test match by a margin of 60 runs. This was the main grudge behind his failure for securing a confirmed place.

Nevertheless, part of him would feel like he failed in his amazing attempt to be in the final set of the cricket team. It somehow resembled that he was not efficient enough, or strong enough, or good enough player to ably prevent his exclusion from happening. Like, somehow he was a liability. The players go through such sort of ordeal very often. It was definitely normal, usual and routine.

Conversely, politicians have no such problem. If they are famous enough to catch people’s eyes, they are heartily and hastily accepted in the new political party. If not selected in the team they seldom waste precious time in becoming the darling of the new party with a new flag. The options remain open until the voracity of their passion for politics does not die down.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Latest News

USA is now a constitutional relic & not a republic

All the founders of the US Constitution and even our own framers from the Constituent Assembly must be squirming in their graves, on what is playing out in the US.

पराजय नहीं, गौरवपूर्ण इतिहास है हमारा…

महाराणा का जीवन वर्तमान का निकष है, उनका व्यक्तित्व स्वयं के मूल्यांकन-विश्लेषण का दर्पण है। क्या हम अपने गौरव, अपनी धरोहर, अपने अतीत को सहेज-सँभालकर रख पाए? क्या हम अपने महापुरुषों, उनके द्वारा स्थापित मानबिन्दुओं, जीवन-मूल्यों की रक्षा कर सके?

Perseverance of Mewar

All of the Persia, England, Arabia felt honoured in sending costly embassies to Mughal Court, but Pratap sent word of defiance.

Right to protest of few privileged ones vs. Rights of the unorganized masses

Are the demands made by protesting groups are justified or not? Who are participating in the protest? Are they really farmers? Who are the organizers?

तां ड व !

OTT पर वेब सीरीज के नाम पर सेक्स, गालिया और नग्नता परोसी जाती ये तो हम सब जानते है। पर शायद पहली...

Who else knew about Balakot besides Arnab? Watch..

An another targeting of this fearless journalist!

Recently Popular

Girija Tickoo murder: Kashmir’s forgotten tragedy

her dead body was found roadside in an extremely horrible condition, the post-mortem reported that she was brutally gang-raped, sodomized, horribly tortured and cut into two halves using a mechanical saw while she was still alive.

5 Cases where True Indology exposed Audrey Truschke

Her claims have been busted, but she continues to peddle her agenda

Daredevil of Indian Army: Para SF Major Mohit Sharma’s who became Iftikaar Bhatt to kill terrorists

Such brave souls of Bharat Mata who knows every minute of their life may become the last minute.

गुप्त काल को स्वर्ण युग क्यों कहा जाता है

एक सफल शासन की नींव समुद्रगप्त ने अपने शासनकाल में ही रख दी थी इसीलिए गुप्त सम्राटों का शासन अत्यधिक सफल रहा। साम्राज्य की दृढ़ता शांति और नागरिकों की उन्नति इसके प्रमाण थे।

“Power over People”: A tale of two democratically elected leaders

We talk about some parallels between two world leaders (Trump and Mrs. Gandhi) from the oldest and the largest democracies who chose power over people and had a very unfortunate and sad ending.