Home Blog Page 651

Hastamalaka the jewel of Adavita crown

0

कस्त्वं शिशो कस्य कुतोऽसि गन्ता
किं नाम ते त्वं कुत आगतोऽसि ।
एतन्मयोक्तं वद चार्भक त्वं
मत्प्रीतये प्रीति विवर्धनोऽसि ॥ १॥

हस्तामलक उवाच ।
नाहं मनुष्यो न च देव-यक्षौ
न ब्राह्मण-क्षत्रिय-वैश्य-शूद्राः ।
न ब्रह्मचारी न गृही वनस्थो
भिक्षुर्न चाहं निजबोध रूपः ॥ २॥

‘Who are you? Whose child are you? Whither are you bound? What is your name? Whence have you come? O Child! I should like to hear your reply to these questions.’ Thus spoke Sri Sankaracharya to the boy, Hastamalaka, who replied as follows.

2. I am neither man, God, Yaksha, Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaisya, Sudra, Brahmachari, householder, forest-dweller, nor Sannyasi; but I am pure awareness alone.

This meeting between Hastamalaka and Guru Shankarachrya proved to be a momentous one when a young boy of thirteen years gives a very prompt reply to Shankar when on being asked about himself. This event is simply the repetition of history as the responses which Hastamalaka gave were the same which Adi Shankar gave to his Guru Govindpad.

Shankaracharya got astonished on hearing the enlightened replies which expounded the real nature of the self from a boy who was dumb till then and his father who was worried brought him before Adi Guru in order to attain his blessings for his dumb child. The comprehensive knowledge that the boy possessed was sufficient enough to prove that the boy was an illustrious soul. His profound Knowledge on the subject of Advita dazzled Acharya so much that Acharya asks his father to hand-over the boy to him and so Hastamalaka becomes the chief disciple of Adi Shankar besides Padampada, Sureshwar, Totakacharya. Hastamalaka=Hasta (palm)+ Amlaka (gooseberry fruit); This name comes from a well-known metaphor. The words HastAmalaka and Karatala-Amalaka are often used in advaita writings. Hastamalaka is one who has the knowledge of the Brahman (God) comfortably like a fruit in his palm. The Hastamalaka Stotra a treatise of twelve verses recited by him holds a place of eminence in the tradition of Advaitic thoughts bearing a unique distinction that none other than Guru Adi Shankar himself wrote a commentary on this fabulous work.

The story of Hastamalaka goes in the manner that while wandering during his Digvijay in order to propagate his vision regarding non-dualism, Acharya Shankar visited a village Sri-Bali near Udupi. The place had the distinction of being an absolutely Aagnihotr village where resided the Brahmanas who performed Yajnas daily and thus called Agnihotris. The place resonated with the sound of Ved-mantras. Most of these Brahmanas were the followers of Purva-Mimamsa school of thought and thus the adherents of various Karmakandas. Sureshwara used to impart them the importance of Jnana.

Among them was a learned Brahmana named Prabhakara who had a son whose face had effulgence but he behaved ignoramusly thus the villagers considerd him foolish or idiot. Prabhakara hears about the arrival of Adi Shankar to his village, goes along with his imbecile son to see him. The Guru is flabbergasted in the presence of this small boy. He looked straight into the boy’s eyes. His eyes had some esoteric glaze. Instatly Acharya realizes that the boy was inundated with the flood of self-Knowledge. Aghast at the immense depth of self awareness, Acharya tells his parents that the child is very much established in Atma-Vidya and so in order to prosper in this skill, he needs to be initiated in to the tradition Sanyas ,thus initiating him into his group of Adavita seers. The self knowledge of this young boy seemed incredible which took the advaita philosophy to new heights and became the torch bearer in Shankarachaya’s Digvijaya by walking the length and breadth of the country along with Shankar.

The ‘Atman’ is attributeless. It is present in the body as the Jiva exactly as the face, in the guise of the reflection, is present in the mirror. The plurality of the Jivas is all about the non-duality of Atman. The element that creates the distinction is the presence of I. The empiric plurality of the Jivas is due to the superimposition, on the non-dual Atman, of the manifoldness of the modes, in which this Atman is reflected. The thoughts mentioned above by Hastamalaka in his quintessential hymn Hastamalakastotra are the gems in the great treasure of Adavita Literature. He states that he is the Atman which – is of the nature of permanent cognition: ‘Nityopalabdhi svarupo aham’. – atma’. Just like the luminosity of the Sun is the prerequisite for all our actions and perceptions, the atman is required for the functioning of the mind and the sense organs. Thus Atman is self luminous. It is as pure as ether and completely liberated.

घनच्छन्नदृष्टिर्घनच्छन्नमर्कम्
यथा निष्प्रभं मन्यते चातिमूढः ।
तथा बद्धवद्भाति यो मूढ-दृष्टेः
स नित्योपलब्धिस्वरूपोऽहमात्मा ॥

These verses by Hastamalaka profusely elaborates about the empirical knowledge of self reality that he possessed.

Shankarcharya was the prolific thinker of adavita school of Indian Philosophy. The times of Shankar were marred by conflicts and oppugnancy among all the sects and cults and significantly was the tremendous hounding of the Brahaminical religion. Adi shankara, in order to bring unity among various sects of hindus during that period, wrote five verses- known as ‘pancharathnam stotras’ for each of the sect those following different deities. Simultaneously, he established four mathas in the four corners of India. Among them the Dwarka Peetha was founded at the western point under the patronage of his great disciple Hastamalaka. He was appointed the first Shankaracharya of Dwarka Peetha. Dwaraka Peetha advocates ‘Tattvamasi’ (That thou art) and was formed on the basis of Sama Veda. In this way, we see that under the auspices of these distinguished disciples of Adi Guru Shankaracharya, the tradition of Hindu culture and ethos flourished substantially and to them goes the credit of perpetuating the glorious tradition of Non-Dualism even after Shankarachrya.

Therefore, the role of these pupils is significant in SHANKAR-DIGVIJAYA, which need to be disseminated in every nook and corner of the country to make people aware of the grand contribution of Shankaracharya’s Adavita Darshan.

Communism is against Indian Ethos

0

The 19th century communist ideology is an outcome of the industrialization wave in the 18th century which led to the supposed creation of 2 main classes of population in society – the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. According to the Marxists, the bourgeoisie who owned the means of production in this capitalistic environment benefited from the profits, while the proletariat suffered with meager salaries as a result of industrialization, thus giving rise to an unequal society.

The solution according to communism is socialism, which entails the elimination of the capitalistic society and replacing it with an order, structured on common ownership of land and its means of production with the absence of social classes, money and the state.

This foreign concept which originated in Europe in very specific conditions in a different civilization has been supplanted in the Indian subcontinent rather obtusely. The communists have been trying to peel away the Indian way of life, looking for similarities between the class struggles in Europe and conditions in India to fit their narrative and somehow gain legitimacy to survive.

The theory of classes from communism have been warped onto the Indian landscape and has been applied to the Varna system. For the communist ideology to gain momentum, it needs a villain. In Europe it was the capitalists who owned the factories and land. In India, it’s the same. You’ll find activists indoctrinated by communist ideologies, targeting successful industrialists like the Ambanis, Adanis, Tatas etc. You will find them raising issues about the extravagant lives the capitalists lead and show you pictures of poor people sleeping on the streets, somehow sending a message that it’s because of these successful people. Any charity or philanthropic work done by these businessmen will be brushed under the carpet by the activists while painting them as evil businessmen. They’ll shut down factories and deprive citizens of employment in states they influence, while not being able to provide any other source of income – thus leaving the population in dire economic conditions.

Another section usually targeted is the Sanatan Varna system, specifically the Brahmin society. They are portrayed as scheming individuals who want power and money at the expense of the poor Dalits. Here, the Brahmins are equated to the bourgeoisie and the Dalits to the proletariat. Smear campaigns are run in every section of society by the communists – in media, in academia, in movies – everywhere. Its funny how they paint a mere 4%-6% of population that comprises of Brahmins to hold so much control over the remaining Hindu population. Endorsements from naïve CEOs are marketed to give it legitimacy and placards reading SmashBrahmanicalPatriarchy are thrown around.

By targeting the traditional knowledge generating Varna of India, the communists want to break the country’s social fabric which for thousands of years had contributed immensely to India’s and the world’s growth. The idea is to render the common man moor-less so that they can step in to mold society in their image.

Communism demands uniformity to be able to transition to a classless society. There is no space for cultural uniqueness in society, in a communist world. That’s why you will verily see their proponents in society who look down upon Indian festivals, terming them a waste of resources and polluting the environment. You will find such activists exhorting people not to celebrate festivals under one pretext or the other. In Diwali it’ll be noise and environment pollution. In Holi or Navratri it’ll be harassment of women. In Raksha-Bandhan, Bhai-Dooj, Karva-Chauth it’ll be targeted using the women’s empowerment platform.

According to Marx, religion is the opium of the people, used by the rich to give false hope to the poor. According to Stalin, religion is seen as retarding human development. Following on those footsteps, you’ll find this ideology percolating in India and being propagated by political parties that want to maintain their voting blocks by consolidating the Dalits, SC, ST, OBC – again by exhorting them to give up Hindu practices and become atheists. You’ll find their proponents breaking Hindu Murtis as a sign of protest, demeaning Hindu gods and goddesses in public, staging theatrical plays painting the Hindu religion as regressive. You’ll find many Hindi and regional movies that make fun of Hindu gods and the Hindu priests. The Sabarimala case is a perfect example where Hindu traditions are belittled, the devotees oppressed by the state and activists posing as female devotees being thrust in the forefront by communists to test Hindu patience. This malaise has seeped in all facets of the Indian society.

To overthrow the bourgeoisie, this ideology calls for a revolution. This revolution is not only intellectual in nature, but a physical one that would use brute force to overthrow the state. Its found in the form of the Naxal movement where the operational brains are in the urban society in different fields of academia, politics, NGOs, media (called the Urban Naxals by Vivek Agnihotri) who are keeping the movement simmering by providing intellectual, monetary and global support to naxal terrorists in the hinterlands bent on breaking the Indian state, using the age-old excuse of oppression at the hands of the evil state. These same breaking-India forces (as Rajiv Malhotra has termed them) commit the most heinous crimes on the tribals and run their own parallel govt with kangaroo courts, which does not get reported enough in the main stream media, which begs the question whether the media as well is infected with this cancer of communism.

This hatred towards the Indian state is seen when the communist ideology supporters run to the aid of defending Kashmiri terrorists legally as well. They label the stone-pelters as mis-guided youth. They call the terrorists as mere rebels and they run to international committees brandishing the Indian army as tormentors of helpless local population. This dangerous ideology supports and in some cases encourages Kashmiri people to pick up the gun against the Indian state. They are bleeding the country from the inside, stamping out economic progress and forcing the country to hemorrhage.

This ideology, which has seen its zenith in the formation of USSR or the cultural revolution of Mao, has seen itself being demolished when the USSR broke up and China veered away to a quasi-communist ideology. Even in its last throes, communism in India still creates havoc. According to some sources tracking the most number of deaths caused by different groups, the Maoist insurgency has led to as many as 12,000 deaths in 20 years in India in with more than 9000 civilians have been murdered by these terrorists for supporting the Indian govt, or have been caught in the exchange of fire between the Indian army and the terrorists. In 2017, India suffered the 3rd most number of terror attacks in the entire world, which is a cause of grave concern for internal security.

If we are to look at the deaths caused directly because of communism, it’s a staggering number of around 100 million people as per Stephane Courtois in his book “The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression”

  • 65 million in the People’s Republic of China
  • 20 million in the Soviet Union
  • 2 million in Cambodia
  • 2 million in North Korea
  • 7 million in Ethiopia
  • 5 million in Afghanistan
  • 1 million in the Eastern Bloc
  • 1 million in Vietnam
  • 150,000 in Latin America
  • 10,000 deaths “resulting from actions of the international Communist movement and Communist parties not in power”

India has since thousands of years been a knowledge seeking civilization. This civilization has a rich diversity of people with their unique ways of life that adds to this beautiful kaleidoscope. Religion and spirituality are revered in India which gives it its strength and humility. Hard work and success in life have been enshrined in our civilizational teachings because of which you will find entrepreneurship flourishing in this country. At the same time, people are known to be charitable, accommodating of differing view points and evolving with every generation.

Communism is antithetical to India. Its in direct opposition to the Dharmic ethos of this nation. For that reason alone, it should be summarily dismissed from the Indian landscape as a failed ideology because its time is way past.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_terrorist_incidents_by_country#2017

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/naxal-violence-claims-12000-lives-in-20-years/articleshow/59521195.cms

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism_and_religion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

AYUSH treats the patient not disease, immigrate Vaidya to AYUSH from cross pathy

0

Unlike modern allopathic system of medicine which diagnoses and treats the disease in particular, AYUSH believes in treating the patient as a whole and that is how it offers the paramedical, wellness based care and healing touch to the patient. India has always grown, developed and advanced in the health sector by including the holistic values by giving utmost importance to the patient than treating the disease in isolation. That is why AYUSH has faith, divine spirit, moral codes, self- discipline etc., than science and experimental proof. The science of AYUSH is different from modern science that rules the world. The science of AYUSH is faith based, i.e., the patient and his/her family members also must believe and trust the Vaidya unconditionally and all of them must follow the instructions of the Vaidya without doubting or questioning.

The divine cord and not the scientific proof that link the Vaidya with the patient. AYUSH so profusely mandate the Vaidya also to follow strict discipline, show high level of honesty and stick to their wisdom and not to breach or pretend as a scholar. But the situation today is totally different.  Most of the present day AYUSH Vaidyas in private practice are so unethical from the philosophical points of view of AYUSH and are engaged in cross pathy. They display half-baked knowledge in allopathic system, claim they are expert in modern medicine but are totally ignorant about own fundamentals – Tridosha method of diagnosis.

Even these days, the advanced country like UK recognizes the importance of midwives and encourages their service in rural areas where qualified doctors are not available. Further the medical care is also quite expensive where the service of midwives is quite affordable. Similarly the treatment of a disease by allopathic system is quite expensive whereas the patient care by AYUSH vaidya is quite affordable as AYUSH is a paramedical wellness centric system that offers healing to the mind as well.

If adequate importance is given to the paramedical wellness based therapy system of AYUSH and AYUSH is promoted for holistic paramedical benefits, certainly India can even prevent the episode of several diseases. The service of AYUSH can be promoted in different parts of India for creating health and hygiene awareness, diet regiments to be followed during different seasons, importance of health moral and health disciple etc. Cross pathy by several AYUSH vaidya in private practice is really destroying the mission of Ministry of AYUSH. Need of the day is patient care and not just treatment of the disease. India has huge burden of chronic, non-communicable diseases both in urban and rural areas. When the treatment leading to total cure is impossible, the importance must be on patient care which is not the subject of allopathic system of medicine. The abundant AYUSH viadyas in private practice can be judiciously used for patient care, wellness and counselling to all those patients who suffer from various chronic ailments.

It looks like we are wasting the rich tributes of AYUSH by allowing cross pathy to happen instead of converting all those AYUSH vaidyas who are engaged in cross pathy in their private practice to promote AYUSH. Once they recognise the importance of patient care certainly they all will immigrate back to AYUSH practice. The stupendous contributions of AYUSH to humanity should not be lost due to cross pathy by several AYUSH vaidya in private practice.

Hindus of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana both can lose political power very soon

0

The recent move by Andhra Pradesh CM Chandrababu Naidu to induct a Muslim Minister in cabinet rank in his cabinet specifically just months before state and parliamentary elections is clearly meant to appease the Muslim minority. He is emboldened after snapping ties with the BJP to go to undue and unbecoming heights to get back his so-called secular image that goes without saying in Indian politics: placating minorities.

In all southern states, Hindus are losing population share because of their strict adherence to family planning. The other reason being, Christianization or proselytizing is no-holds-barred in Andhra. It appears that every alternate person in that place is a convert although possess a Hindu name outwardly.

The carriers of names like Shiv Parvathy, Lakshmi, Sarasvati, Ganesh, Shunmukh etc. are also of dubious distinction of having another baptized name with the Church. They’re all crypto-Christians who for want of reservations and other benefits didn’t change their names.

Chandrababu wooed them enough by funding out money for building Christian-Bhavans and Churches throughout the state. He offers doles on the eve of every Christmas in the form of kits. Though there is a fierce competitor like YS Jaganmohan Reddy himself a Christian, Naidu could make in roads into that sizable community.

Now Babu is concentrating on Muslims of Andhra (that are 17%) which the big brother Owaisi of Hyderabad didn’t like. So, he started supporting Naidu’ s opponent in the state YS Jaganmohan Reddy. The simple reason for that is both Owaisi’s and YS Jagan party gel with each other as both are minority dominated parties. They are like cousins. And another reason being, Owaisi said he is personally a good friend of YS Jaganmohan Reddy. Here also the above equation may apply.

Jaganmohan Reddy’s YSRCP already has a good image among Muslim minorities. The party is saying that they don’t need Owaisi’s support or propaganda. Yet Owaisi is hell-bent on giving support. Why? Because Owaisi wants a decisive victory for YSRCP. Owaisi’s campaign definitely helps in Andhra Pradesh for YSRCP.

In the entire game, where is BJP? It cannot join hands with YSRCP as the party (YSRCP) is wedded to the cause of special category status to Andhra Pradesh and it will not budge on that.

If BJP wins resounding victory in 2019 parliamentary elections, it’s good. In case BJP falls short of majority, neither the TRS of Telangana nor the YSRCP of Andhra Pradesh could come to its rescue from the southern states to join for a coalition, as both are puppets in the hands of Owaisi. Of course, the parties have their independence which is somewhat compromised to their votes banks.

Last time round TRS was friendly with BJP/NDA government (without confronting much with the Centre) to get free flow of funds and other perks from it, to smoothly run the state government (though not being in coalition). It maintained friendship with MIM of Owaisi at state level as Telangana is a densely Muslim populated state. TRS played its cards well to that extent.

This time in 2019, if at all BJP needs TRS and YSRCP as coalition partners, they (both parties) come with a high-price tag. TRS demands to ratify its 12% reservations to Muslims by including it into the ninth schedule of the Constitution. The party TRS is carrying it (12% Muslim reservations) like an iron rod at the back of its neck. Similarly, the YSRCP demands for ratifying Dalit-Christian reservations, again an amendment to the Constitution. The weakening of BJP causes havoc to nation. Congress has no qualms in agreeing to all.

Hence, the BJP should focus on Andhra Pradesh for containing proselytizing activities by entrusting the work to Swami Paripoornanda who has got enough acumen to do that. Similarly, it has to focus on other developmental issues where Naidu failed to deliver. It should also appraise people through vigorous campaigning what “special package” to the state of Andhra Pradesh meant, and in what ways it surpasses the “ special category status” the other parties are vouching for on obtaining. It should gear the party machinery from now on.

Here is how the government can win back the support of Middle Class by tweaking Income Tax slabs

0

55 months have passed since Modi government was established in May 2014 and 5 more to go with one budget to woo the nation. One of the major supporters for giving a clear mandate to BJP was Urban middle class. Analysis of the results of 3 states election last week showed that a part of these supporters have left BJP camp resulting in a massive 3-0 defeat for Modi ji led BJP.

In my own assessment during last 55 months middle class has received a lot of direct and indirect benefits but somehow these are overshadowed by few things like hike in Excise duty for Petrol/Diesel and increase in Service tax from 15% to 18% in GST.

Direct benefits

2014 2018
Nil (0) tax Upto 2,00,000 (2 Lakh) Upto 2,50,000 for General (2.5 Lakh )

Up to 2,90,000 for Salaried (2.9 Lakh )

Tax on income till Rs. 5 Lakh 10% for 2,00,000- 5,00,000 5% for 2,50,000-5,00,000

5% for 2,90,000-5,00,000

Deduction under 80 c investment 1,00,000 (1 Lakh) 1,50,000 (1.5 Lakh)
Deduction under NPS Rs 0 Rs 50,000

 

Indirect benefits

2014 2018
House Loan rate 10.15% 8.65%
Inflation >10% <5%
New Roads <10 KM per day >28 KM per day
Sanitation coverage 38% 95%

 

In spite of the above benefits the middle class seems disappointed as these benefits aren’t clearly visible and probably meager as per the expectations.

A probability to woo the lost supports could be the possibility of increasing the tax-free slab to 5 Lakh per year.

Recently IT department has released the data for FY 2015-16 & FY 2016-17. Based on this data I tried to evaluate how much it would cost to raise the tax free allowance to 5 Lakh in 2017.

I have created 3 scenarios on the recent most Direct tax data for Individual people:

Existing Slab (2017) Proposal 1 Proposal 2
0-250000 0% 0% 0%
250000-500000 10% 0% 0%
500000-550000 20% 20% 10%
550000-1000000 20% 20% 20%
>1000000 30% 30% 30%

 

  1. Existing tax slabs
  2. Proposal 1: Tax slab of 0% tax till 5 Lakh and retaining 20% and 30% as is.
  3. Proposal 2: Tax slab with 0% till 5 Lakh and 10% from 5 Lakh to 5.5 Lakh.  (Rational for this is that incentive for showing income of less than 5 Lakh would increase if the next  tax rate is 20%. With 10% tax slab incentive will reduce. This phenomenon is common in banking. For example we need to write PAN number if amount is greater than 50,000 so people started depositing 49,000 )
    Slab No. of Returns Sum of Returned Income (in Cr ) Average Returned Income  A: Existing Slab (in Cr)  B: Proposal 1 (in Cr)  C: Proposal 2 (in Cr)
    0 2,78,575 0 0                          –                            –                          –
    >0-<=1,50,000 23,44,222 20,127                    85,858                          –                            –                          –
    >150,000-<=2,00,000 16,07,128 28,536                1,77,559                          –                            –                          –
    >2,00,000-<=2,50,000 34,19,282 78,472                2,29,498                          –                            –                          –
    >2,50,000-<=3,50,000 1,98,94,844 5,93,518                2,98,328                   9,615                            –                          –
    >3,50,000-<=4,00,000 35,36,489 1,32,011                3,73,283                   4,360                            –                          –
    >4,00,000-<=4,50,000 24,07,190 1,02,079                4,24,059                   4,190                            –                          –
    >4,50,000-<=5,00,000 23,66,569 1,12,953                4,77,286                   5,379                            –                          –
    >5,00,000-<=5,50,000 14,73,910 77,323                5,24,611                   4,410                        726                      363
    >5,50,000-<=9,50,000 55,87,610 3,93,491                7,04,221                36,791                  22,822                20,028
    >9,50,000-<=10,00,000 3,34,333 32,599                9,75,046                   4,012                     3,176                   3,009
    >10,00,000-<=15,00,000 16,71,003 2,00,866              12,02,068                31,017                  26,840                26,004
    >15,00,000-<=20,00,000 6,68,652 1,15,088              17,21,194                22,825                  21,153                20,819
    >20,00,000 10,85,307 5,68,904              52,41,872             1,51,678               1,48,965             1,48,422
    Total 4,66,75,114 24,55,967             2,72,603               2,30,393             2,25,205

    The results for the 3 scenarios are:

    1. Existing slabs: Govt would get 2,72,603 Cr and in reality government has actually approximately similar amount (2,73,405 Cr from 4.66 Cr people).
    2. In Proposal 1, GoI would get 2,30,393 Cr only in case tax-free allowance increased to 5 Lakh.
    3. In Proposal 2, (introduction of 10% slab and tax-free allowance of 5 lakh) will make GoI collection to 2,25,205 Cr only.

    Quite a big amount if we just look into the numbers. It would have cost more than 42,000 Cr to increase tax-free amount to 5 Lakh but in Jan 2019 it would not cost that much as Mr Jaitley has already  reduced 10% slab to 5% which effectively means 50% reduction. Other than this we have section 87A which means govt gives rebate of INR 2,500 if taxable income is less than 5 Lakh. However income tax files have increased from 4.6 Cr to 6.8 Cr in 2018 which can increase the amount needed to 25,000 Cr.

    Now the question is, would Mr Jaitley and Mr Modi dole out 25,000 Cr (Increasing fiscal deficit by just 0.13%) to get 11 Cr votes from middle class or will they stick to fiscal consolidation?

    In next series I would explore ways to raise 25,000 Cr to implement this suggestion.

क्या ‘कांग्रेस पार्टी’ को आज तक नहीं समझ पाई भारतीय जनता पार्टी?

0

नयी दिल्ली. भारतीय जनता पार्टी को लगभग 38 साल हो गए हैं और वो यह दावा भी करती है कि वो कांग्रेस पार्टी की घोर विरोधी है। किसी विरोधी राजनैतिक दल को समझने के लिए क्या इतना समय काफी नहीं है? क्या इन चार दशकों में बीजेपी पूरी तरह कांग्रेस को पहचान पाई है? लगातार धोखा खाने के बाद भी क्या भाजपा, कांग्रेस पार्टी के बयानों को गंभीरता से लेती है?

आगे हम कुछ घटनाओं का सन्दर्भ लेकर यह जानने की कोशिश करेंगे कि क्या बीजेपी वाकई में अपने विरोधी दल को पहचान पाई है या नहीं?

सबसे पहले बात करते हैं राफेल डील की, जिसके सहारे राहुल गाँधी ने अपनी चुनावी नैया पार लगा ली है। हालाँकि इस मामले में सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने भाजपा को थोड़ी राहत जरूर दी है, लेकिन इस मुद्दे से अगर किसी का फायदा हुआ है तो वो है कांग्रेस पार्टी।

चुनावी रैलियों के अलावा कांग्रेस पार्टी ने इसे न्यूज़ चैनलों पर भी खूब भुनाया है। तथ्य उनके साथ नहीं थे फिर भी Ecosystem की सहायता से उन्होंने अपना हित साध ही लिया। दूसरी ओर बीजेपी कांग्रेस को नैतिकता का पाठ पढ़ाती ही रह गई कि राष्ट्रीय सुरक्षा से खिलवाड़ नहीं होना चाहिए। अमित शाह जी राहुल गाँधी से उनकी सूचना का सोर्स ही पूछते रह गए। हद तो तब हो गई जब सुप्रीम कोर्ट के फैसले के बाद बीजेपी के नेता राहुल गाँधी से माफ़ी माँगने की मांग करने लगे।

तीन बड़े राज्यों में आप अभी-अभी चुनाव हार गए और आपको राहुल गाँधी के माफ़ी की चिंता सता रही है! और क्या सिर्फ माफ़ी मांगने से काम चल जाएगा? बिना तथ्यों के कोई आपको चूना लगा गया और आप कैमरे के ‘नैतिकता’ पर बहस करते ही रह गए।

दूसरा है क्रिश्चियन मिशेल का मुद्दा। जब कांग्रेस पार्टी से जुड़े तीन-चार वकील मिशेल की ओर से कोर्ट में उपस्थित हुए तो मीडिया ने बहुत शोर मचाया। भाजपा ने फिर से ‘नैतिकता’ के बाण कांग्रेस पार्टी की ओर छोड़ दिए जो रास्ते में ही फुस्स हो गए क्योंकि नैतिकता का कोई बाण उन्हें छू भी नहीं सकता। उस वकील को पार्टी से निकाल दिया गया और ऐसा प्रदर्शित किया गया जैसे देश पर बहुत बड़ा एहसान कर दिया गया हो!

जबकि ध्यान से देखने पर यह पता चलता है कि इस मामले में भी कांग्रेस पार्टी को फायदा ही हुआ है, क्योंकि मिशेल का साथ देने के लिए उन्होंने सही आदमी को सही जगह पहुँचा ही दिया है। वैसे भी मिशेल टीवी पर आकर यह नहीं कहने वाला कि उसने किन-किन लोगों को कब-कब ‘मैनेज’ किया है? अतः इस मुद्दे पर भी भाजपा, कांग्रेस से पीछे ही रही है।

तीसरा है महाभियोग यानि Impeachment। ये एक ऐसा मामला है जिससे कांग्रेस पार्टी को कई फायदे हुए हैं। पहला, अयोध्या का मसला अगले साल तक टल गया है। दूसरा, जजों को जो संदेश देना था, वो पार्टी ने दे दिया और तीसरा, न्यायधीशों को खुलेआम डराने के बावजूद उन्हें किसी को जवाब देना नहीं पड़ा।

किसी ने उनसे ये नहीं पूछा कि भाई ये क्या चल रहा है? किसी भी दूसरे देश में जहाँ लोकतंत्र है, वहाँ ऐसा करना और बचकर निकल भी जाना क्या संभव है? अमेरिका, ब्रिटेन या अन्य पश्चिमी देशों में क्या ऐसा हो सकता है? हमारे यहाँ यह कोई मुद्दा ही नहीं है, ना ही इसकी कोई चर्चा हुई। सबने ऐसा मान लिया कि ये सब तो चलता रहता है, कोई बड़ी बात नहीं है। अब किसी को याद भी नहीं है कि कांग्रेस पार्टी ने मुख्य न्यायधीश के खिलाफ महाभियोग लाने की कोशिश भी की थी, उल्टे कुछ दिन बाद लेफ्ट नेताओं ने यह भी कहना शुरू कर दिया था कि केंद्र सरकार न्यायधीशों पर दबाव डाल रही है।

चौथा मुद्दा है कर्जमाफी का। इस मामले में भी कांग्रेस पार्टी के सुर कुछ अच्छे नहीं लग रहे हैं। चुनाव परिणाम के बाद जैसे ही यह झूठी खबर आई कि केंद्र सरकार किसानों का क़र्ज़ माफ़ करने वाली है, उसी वक़्त ‘कर्जमाफी’ का भाग्य लिखा जा चुका है।

इन सभी मामलों से स्पष्ट है कि देश की राजनीति में फिलहाल ‘नैतिकता’ का कोई स्थान नहीं है। बीजेपी यह जितनी जल्दी समझ जाए यह उनके लिए अच्छा होगा। या फिर ऐसा भी हो सकता है कि देश की राजनीति को साफ़-सुथरा दिखाने का सारा बोझ बीजेपी ने अपने सर ले लिया हो, यह सोचकर कि देखो भाई! हमारे यहाँ हालात अभी इतने खराब नहीं हुए हैं।

How Naidu bet his salt bag over sinking Congress and lost the game in Telengana

0

The chief of TDP Mr. Chandrababu Naidu must recall the bedtime story about the smart donkey and the fate of salt seller after the defeat of his ambition to become king both in Telengana and at national level.

He apparently tried to make the congress to pull his baggage of rejection and dislike of people to become somewhat relevant in Indian politics. He formed an alliance with congress much against the core philosophy and principles of TDP purely due to his greed to become relevant in the changing time.

Naidu suddenly realised that not only he should join the dynast but also must accuse and criticize Prime Minister Modi for everything so that he becomes a great leader. But the intelligent people of Telengana taught a tough lesson to Naidu and made him eat own pie.

Initially he made a wrong mathematics with his outdated political calculator that if he joins with the dynast, he would sweep Telengana assembly. But he did not realize that his baggage is full of salt and he wants the congress to carry his baggage and cross the river, and once the baggage comes to the other side of the river he can safely collect the baggage.

Congress party would have initially felt forming an alliance with TDP is a wonderful thing and only with the support of such fringe political forces Congress can become relevant.  But the same time Congress was in no mood to carry the baggage of TDP.

The donkey that used to carry the salt bag of the merchant once realized that if the bag is dipped in river water, considerable quantity of salt would dissolve in water and thereby the weight of the bag would reduce so the donkey can cross the river easily, then on the donkey started to use the trick to fool the salt seller. But the merchant was not that smart like the donkey, never weighed the quantity of the salt but was always appreciative of the donkey as it quickly transports the salt bags to other side of the river.

Like the salt merchant, the baggage of TDP, Naidu thought he can make the congress to carry and can profit politically. But the Congress, instead of crossing the river, had sunk in the river due to its misdeeds along with the baggage of Naidu causing Naidu to suffer an acute political starvation in Telengana.

The problems of Naidu are deep rooted and he cannot easily wash off his mal-governance through his national ambition. When two politically marginalized, irrelevant political forces join together, naturally they have to share nothing but defeat. The massive mandate of TRS also came from the anger of people against TDP-Congress alliance.

The situation of Naidu after the defeat is quite precarious. The defeat has gone not so deep inside his throat or in his buccal cavity so he could not can either swallow or spit out. He will find it hard going with Congress and will be even harder to snap the ties.

Jaganmohan Reddy is growing politically in Andhra Pradesh and people want Reddy not Naidu for Andhra Pradesh. Alliance between Jaganmohan Reddy, TRS and BJP may prove great for the state, and also such force can end corruption in the state by removing TDP from power.

TRS has mastered its politics and at national level TRS wants an alliance without BJP and Congress. This is smart politics. People want BJP to correct some of its mistakes. The same people never want Congress to comeback to power. So anyone joining hands with Congress will have face defeat and earn wrath of people.

TRS has understood this ground truth and that is why they want to oppose Congress. TRS does not seem to have any problem with BJP as KCR believes in mutual support and co-operation between centre and state for the betterment of Telengana.

But Naidu wants nothing but politics and power. The difference is that both BJP headed by Modiji and TRS believes in development and governance while Naidu and Congress believe in politics and negativism. People of Andhara Pradesh and Telengana are wise and will certainly prove the permanent extinction of TDP from Indian politics.

 NOTA – an unwarranted contestant in Elections

0

“What is not in practice cannot be held illegal and as much, what is in practice cannot be termed as legal either”.

In the recent assembly elections held in 4 states, the reports that are coming in reveal that NOTA could have played a spoilsport. It is a very expensive loss for those candidates who lost narrowly due to the high number of NOTA. I just quote an example, instead of providing full details of NOTA statistics.

In Telangana state, there was a massive increase of 47 per cent in NOTA votes to about 2.25 lakh, compared to the 2014 polls. A total of 2,24,709 voters pressed the NOTA option on EVMs (Electronic Voting Machines), rejecting all the candidates in their respective constituencies, as against 1.52 lakh in the 2014 elections. Nota accounted for 1.1 per cent of the around 2.05 crore votes cast in the December 7 elections (source: The Deccan Chronicle).

In the Amberpet Assembly in Telangana state, NOTA votes stood at 1,462, which is more than the 1,016 votes by which BJP candidate B. Kishan Reddy lost to Kaleru Venkatesham of the TRS.

Who are those like-minded group of voters who opt for NOTA instead of choosing the best candidate among the contestants? This is a very intriguing question. By any chance, if the Psephologists who conducted the Exit Polls had it recorded the background of each NOTA Voter and the reason why they opted NOTA, then it would certainly reveal the common frustration of those voters or if they are a large group of sympathisers of other major political parties?

To elaborate this let us take a hypothesis. A strong BJP fans group or AAP, where for some reasons the respective political parties did not field its candidates, then there is every likelihood, that such fans of BJP or AAP would have opted for NOTA. This is because of the fact, that such core supporters of BJP or AAP or any other major (non-BJP non-AAP) parties, would never vote for Congress, and in a similar way the other supporters of Congress or TRS would never vote for BJP or AAP but opt for NOTA in such similar situations.

So can the trend of supporters of any political party by opting NOTA as a revenge be justified?

When Pakistan rightly rejected the proposal to include the NOTA in ballot papers, India, unfortunately, acceded to this popular demand. But NOTA in many senses is illogical entry made into the Indian Ballot Papers or EVMs. However, since NOTA was implemented as per the directions of the Supreme Court of India, it has acquired legitimacy.

Legality of NOTA.

At the outset, inclusion of NOTA is in many ways violates the underlying concept of the very electoral process, as defined in the ‘The representation of the people Act 1951″

Throughout this act, its emphasis is on the ‘candidates’, meaning living human candidates only. In referendums or other polls, people vote for options, but in elections held under the Representation of People Act, people vote for human beings.

In a stricter sense, either a Ballot Paper or an EVM button should display only the contesting “Living human persons” and their respective party or Individual poll symbols as allotted by the Election Commission. The symbol of NOTA as placed at the end of the list of contesting candidates’, is an abstract image not capable of representing physically in the Parliament or in State Assemblies.

Secondly, Elections are intended to elect a candidate to represent the constituency either in the Parliament or State Legislative Assembly or to any other functional body. The NOTA option is at the most a chance to the Citizens to express their ‘displeasure’ of all the candidate’s listed supra in the Ballot paper or EVMs. This is highly inappropriate as the Citizens valued franchise will be wasted.

The other aspect of shortcoming in the NOTA option is, the voter is expected to verify the fitness of all the candidates listed in the EVMs or Ballot Papers before exercising his or her franchise. To Illustrate this situation, if we take a constitution where 20 candidates are seeking elections, the voter is at the outset should verify the credentials of all the 20 candidates in a gentle way from Sl no 1 to 20 after entering into the Voting Table, where the EVM is placed. After this glance, he or she is expected to decide to whom to vote? Is it practically feasible? Or are the voters going through this process strictly in all the constituencies? The fallacy is 90% voters will be aware of only a couple of candidates belonging to some major political parties or a popular Individual in the constituency. Beyond this, the rest of, say 15 to 16 candidates will be simply ignored without even glancing at them. This is what mostly happening throughout India.

The above situation is real and can be witnessed in almost all the polling booths. Then the EC or many others may argue that the EC on its respective state and regional websites providing the details of the candidates and hence people will not have any difficulty in doing some homework before they walk into the polling booths. This is highly absurd. It is an open secret how many aam aadmi voters have access to the Internet to get prepared themselves to opt for NOTA. It is a sure fact that 90% of educated elite too would not have bothered to study the list of candidates contesting elections in their respective constituency. Hence let us write off this argument with ease.

The next quandary involved in NOTA option is, the voter is expected to know the competency of each and every candidate listed in the EVMs to his or her satisfaction before he or she comes to a conclusion that all the 20 candidates are “unfit”. And surprisingly such a scanning of candidates by the voter is to be taken within a couple of minutes while staring at the EVMs But in reality and practice, one can say 99% of Voters who opt to press the NOTA button, will be rejecting the candidates who represent the major and popular political parties, but not the ‘rest’.

This will mean, the NOTA voters will be knowing nothing about the rest of the candidates say, 15 or 16 candidates. What if (among the 15 or 16 candidates) a promising and well educated upright Independent candidate also appear on the EVMs and yet he too gets rejected when the voter hurries to go to the NOTA button. It will amount to gross injustice to many upright candidates. The reality is, in the majority of the instances the voters are predetermined to opt for NOTA, well before walking into the polling booth.

The very concept of NOTA is defeated in as much as the majority of voters who opted to press NOTA button were not dejected about the ‘candidates’ and their fitness, but it turned out to be an expression of general frustration of elections and its associated corrupt practices which have been troubling such voters. It is clearly evident that the high NOTA vote percentage in the recent polls has only exhibited a referendum on the functioning of our Electoral Democracy in general. However, this has defeated our very promising Prime Minister Mr Modi who worked relentlessly at an average 16-18 hours a day for 4 and half years.

It is time India voters shun cynicism and avoid the costly mistake of re-electing the UPA which has proved itself in the past as the world’s the worst corrupt political ally ever ruled India.

It is also high time that the concerned citizens and Intellectuals approach the Supreme Court with a plea to relook into its earlier order where the Hon’ble Supreme Court had ordered the EC to incorporate the NOTA in all ballot papers and EVMs.

The votes polled to NOTA is virtually nothing beneficial to the democracy but a mere ‘scrap’ votes on par with the ‘Invalid votes’ that are rejected in counting.

NOTA in a way a clever scam, thrust upon this huge Democracy by Vested Interests, who always wish their enemies get defeated. The last Sri Lankan elections should serve as an eye-opener for Indians.

It is apt here to express our displeasure against many recent verdicts which were heavily tilted towards admiring and implementing many popular utopian and idealistic jargons rather than looking into its adaptability in line with the existing constitution and its rational attainment. The Parliament and Legislative Assemblies would have to face severe pragmatic challenges in implementing such ‘utopian’ rulings. It is high time our Judiciary confine to interpreting the laws in case of ambiguity, instead of passing judgments not in conformity with the basic principles of our Constitution.

NOTA and its implications

0

Recent assembly elections have highlighted a new fact that NOTA is no more just an additional key in the EVMs but a new tool for impacting the results. However, voters should not be blamed for choosing the NOTA as it shows their discontent with the proposed candidates. At the same time, it is also very important to analyze the implications of the NOTA.

According to the Electoral Statistics Pocket Book 2017 [1], “According to the directions of Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Election Commission made provision in the ballot papers/EVMs for None of The Above (NOTA) option so that the voters who come to the polling booth and decide not to vote for any of the candidates in the fray, are able to exercise their right not to vote for any candidates while maintaining the secrecy of their ballot. The votes polled against the NOTA option are not taken into account for calculating the total valid votes polled by the contesting candidates for return of security deposits to candidates. Even if the number of electors opting for NOTA option is more than the number of votes polled by any of the candidates, the candidate who secures the largest number of votes has to be declared elected.”

It implies even if NOTA bags 99 out 100 votes, the candidate getting remaining one vote will be declared elected. What do NOTA citizens gain then? Well, it gives candidates (or their respective party) to analyze the situation and concerns of the citizens. But this comes at the cost of five precious years that has been handed to the party you dislike more than the other. These five years could have been utilized for propagating the nation (or state) forward but now the same five years could push the nation (state) backward.

As human psychology, we can not hate/like two things (persons, movies, gadgets) equally. We will always be leaned towards the one either regarding hate or love. In the case of elections, even if you are dissatisfied with all the parties, there must be one who is best among the worst and this is the ‘one’ who deserve your vote instead of NOTA. However, if you opt for NOTA, which you are tempted to do because you loathe all the candidates, you are directly helping the candidate whom you loathe most to come to power.

On a more serious note, politicians always strive for the votes and their every strategy or policy reflects the same and we can’t expect them to think beyond it. But, as a responsible citizen, we must think about the good interest of the nation even if we are the last person standing to do that. Even if we have to choose among the corrupt politicians, choose the one who is least corrupt, choose the one who can crawl towards the development of the nation than who push it backward and chose the one who has an iota of nationality than who is committed to breaking this great nation.

Let’s strive to ‘Nation First and Individual Last’ because our hatred for some candidates or party can change the course of the nation. Please come forward, vote and say NO TO NOTA.

[1] “Electoral Statistics Pocket Book 2017, pages 83-85,” https://eci.gov.in/files/file/5580-electoral-statistics-pocket-book-2017/ accessed: 14-12-2018.

Why India needs a new model of governance

0

Democracy, yes it should be because democracy is the only workable form of government in the Indian context to rule the country. The great diversities of regions, religions, languages, cultures and the rest make democracy the only form of government possible where the needs and necessities of all the constituent parts and people could be kept at the required levels of satisfaction.

So the question arises why there is a need for any change in the governance structure of the country. When the country is already under a democratic rule why the model needs to be changed and if the change is at all imperative what that change should be, and what the new model should be. Valid questions these are and valid must be the answers to satisfy the contention that the country needs a change in the model of governance and government.

More than seventy years have passed since the country gained independence after a prolonged freedom struggle. Fathers of the Indian nation adopted the democratic and republican form of government for the country and fixed the short term, medium term and the long term objectives for the country. The first short term, as well as in a sense the long term, objective was to maintain the hard gained independence of the country.

Has that objective been achieved? Yes and no as well. Yes because the country enjoys a respectable independent position in the comity of nations. Plus the country is well capable of defending her sovereignty, unity and integrity. In that sense the freedom of the country stands safeguarded and maintained.

But, have the benefits of the freedom been enjoyed universally, where all the people of the country have equally reaped the fruits of that freedom? In that respect the prognosis is that the objective of maintaining the freedom has not been fully achieved. There are lots of people in the country who have not enjoyed the full benefits of the freedom and have remained outside the realm of the list of the beneficiaries of the freedom.

Many chronic ills that have not been eradicated fully in the country belie the claims for the people who are adversely impacted by these ills that they are constituent parts of a democratic form of government. Even though numerous schemes and policies are there for the inclusion of these people in the mainstream of the Indian society but somehow the benefits fail to reach to the target groups.

These ills include poverty, poor health care, poor human development indices, homelessness and hunger. Existence of scarcity amidst the plentitude makes these ills even more complicated. It indicates that there are systemic and systematic flaws which prevent the distribution of a portion of the plentitude to the needy.

Communal carnage that took place at the time of independence and communalism that was responsible for the partition of the country still haunts the country one way or the other. Still the occurrences of different untoward incidents, on communal lines, from different parts of the country are reported frequently from various parts of the country. Not a good omen for the health, progress and integrity of the country.

The country at this juncture of her history should have been fighting with the exploitative powerful countries of the world to accord her and other developing countries their due place at the global stage. But, the chronic ills have kept the country engaged with the internal national politics leaving less time and energy for dealing with the powerful countries.

How this all necessitates the change in the model of governance, is the question. In response there is a direct relation between the current model of the government and existence of these ills. First the legislature fails to perform its due role; there are more of adjournments than any business in the Parliament and the State Legislatures. Executive of the country at both the levels of the federal structure fails to adapt to the demands of time, it is conservative and less of dynamic. In the adverse cases it turns out to be more an iron frame of a conservative bureaucracy and less of a dynamic institution to be ready to evolve and mutate as per the exigencies of the time, and situations.

About the judiciary, when it takes more than 30 years for it to decide a case of communal violence, it says everything about the way the judiciary delivers justice in the country. The justice in the country is delivered in its delay in most of the cases and at times the affected parties and people fail to see the dawn of justice, even after it is seemingly delivered.

Main flaws they are in the branches and pillars of democracy in the country and they are directly responsible for keeping the chronic ills of the country mostly unaddressed. These flaws are responsible, here too directly, for the criminalization of politics and falling standards of political parties who show more of arrogance and less of humility towards the ruled.

All these flaws make it imperative upon the country to change or modify the model of the democratic government. The contours of the model could be set by changing the way governance is conducted in the country. The beginning could be made by making the Parliament, and the state Legislatures, operational throughout the year in the real sense.

It is observed that during the times when the Parliament and the State Legislature are in session the bureaucracy becomes more responsive towards public issues and grievances. By keeping the session of the legislature round the year the bureaucracy would be made to attendant its duties much more effectively than currently is the case.

True it might be a costly affair for the country but when the benefits are more than the costs it is worth giving a try. Nevertheless, if the conduct of the entire house might not be possible still the session could be run throughout the year of the portion of the legislature, not less than 10% of it alongwith the session involving full strength as is in vogue. The membership of these sessions should be proportional to the overall strength of the parties in the legislature. The members should have the privilege to ask the questions throughout the year, and each day in a year and the government should be duty bound to reply.

This way, at the time of urgency, the government would not require going for the ordinance route, which is equivalent to an undemocratic procedure. The lesser strength session would legislate at those times which would be ratified by the full session and even if it is not ratified it would be fully democratic for all the political parties are involved in the legislation. With requisite modifications, adjustments and readjustment this system could be made operational and effective in the country.

Coming to the bureaucracy the round the year overseeing and effective supervision by the political executive could mobilize it to create a sense of activism towards public service which is currently missing. On its own the bureaucracy should show eagerness to give up the all the archaic and ineffective procedures, customs and rules. This branch is the eyes, arms and hands of the government and it must remain in a state of optimal health, growing and developing.
Judiciary of the country has to become time bound. It has to start delivering justice in time. The delayed justice, which currently is the trend, must end now. Towards this end it must be made to deliver its judgments in a time bound manner, the judgments must come in that time and no way after and beyond that. There should be a specified time for a case of murder, a time for a case of rape and so on and so forth to deliver the judgment.

Judgments must anyhow come in this time on the basis of the available evidences and merits of the cases or absence of the evidence. In the latter case the judgment would be delivered accordingly, but there would a judgment and not indecision. No doubt these should be a right to appeal against the judgments so delivered but there too a cap becomes imperative on the number of appeals.

If these few things are taken care of there would be a great change in the democratic model of the country. In fact, it might turn out an entirely a new and effective model of the governance without impacting the basic system, and tenets, of governance. This way all the chronic and acute ills of the country can be taken care of including the ill of criminalization of the politics.

All the people who have not benefited from the freedom of the country so far could be included in the purview of the benefits. Democracy in that case would be in the interest of the popular sovereign of the country and the country at large. What else being the largest democracy demands?