Home Blog Page 583

सख्त रवीश का सख्त इंटरव्यू

वो दरसल संप्रदायिकता के ख़िलाफ़ छिड़ी इस जंग को कमज़ोर नही करना चाहते थे इसलिए नीलकंठ बन आदर्श पत्रकारिता को उन्होंने अपने कंठ में ही रोक लिया ।  

आज भारतीय पत्रकारिता का सबसे सख़्त, हलख से जीभ निकाल देने वाला इंटर्व्यू देखा। और हम सब जानते है, ऐसा सख़्त इंटरव्यू रवीश जी के अलावा भला और कौन ले सकता है। वो आज अखिलेश यादव जी से प्राइवट चार्टर्ड प्लेन में बात कर रहे थे। उनसे पूछा विज्ञापनो में आप भाजपा से क्यू पिछड़ रहे है? इस पर अखिलेश जी ने प्राइवट हवाई जहाज़ में बैठे बैठे कहा की हमारे पास पैसा नही है।

अब यही से अंतर समझ आता है, इस अवसर पर यदि कोई गोदी मीडिया होता तो जवाब में कुछ पूँछता ही नही, लेकिन यहाँ रवीश जी थे। तुरंत उनके अंदर के पत्रकार की तीसरी आँख खुल गयी और उन्होंने अखिलेश की गर्दन दबोचते हुए अपने दाँत भींच कर पूँछा कि अबे लोहिया के तोतले समाजवादी ये प्लेन मे उड़ने का पैसा क्या तेरी बुआ दे रही है या टोंटी बेच के ख़ुद कमाया है?

इंटरव्यू यही नही रुका !

फिर इस बार चुनाव में मुलायम के कम प्रचार करने के प्रश्न पर भी जब अखिलेश ढोल-मोल जवाब देते दिखे तब फिर उनकी तीसरी आँख खुल गयी और इस बार तो उन्होंने लगभग प्लेन से बाहर ही फेंक दिया होता। पर उन्हें रामानन्द सागर में होने वाले चित्रण की तरह ही लिबरल लोक के सारे धर्मनिरपेक्ष देवी देवता करबद्ध मुद्रा में ब्रह्मांड में सहष्णुता (tolerance) के लिए विनती करते हुए दिखाई दिए और फिर वो शांत हो गए। वो दरसल संप्रदायिकता के ख़िलाफ़ छिड़ी इस जंग को कमज़ोर नही करना चाहते थे इसलिए नीलकंठ बन आदर्श पत्रकारिता को उन्होंने अपने कंठ में ही रोक लिया।

सब कुछ आनंदमय चल रहा था, गणेश विद्यार्थी जी भी अपने लोक में बैठे बैठे पत्रकारिता के इस नए लौकिक अवतार की दिव्य लीलाओं को देख मंद मंद मुस्कुरा रहा थे लेकिन तभी एक समस्या हो गयी।

दरसल जब रवीश जी की तीसरी आँख खुल रही थी तभी अलार्म बजा और मेरी भी दोनो आँखे खुल गयी। और समझ आया की ये तो मैं सपना देख रहा था।

निसंदेह इंटरव्यू तो सच में हुआ है लेकिन अब समझ नही आ रहा की क्या रवीश जी ने सच में ऐसे गर्दन पकड़ी थी या वो केवल सपना देखा था। मुझे इस शंका को दूर करने की ज़रूरत लगी नही क्यूंकि रवीश जी कोई गोदी मीडिया तो है नही इसलिए ये मान लेना उचित होगा की उन्होंने सच में बहुत कठोर इंटरव्यू लिया होगा।

विश्वास न हो तो आप ख़ुद ही देख लो उनका नया शो – “रवीश का रोड शो”।

To fight against “Godi Media” follow Author on twitter at @Raghav_Uvaach

What is wrong with talking about Rajiv Gandhi, the disgraced ex Prime Minister of our country?

0

Before I start this article, I would like to make one thing clear. I don’t like the Congress Party and its secular ideology and I hate what they have done to my country. But the issue am about to talk is not about the Congress but their entitled Prince and Princess.

Just like the Congress tried to reinvent our history books by shaming the Hindus about their culture by only picking at the social ills prevalent at that time while conveniently  glorifying the Mughals and making a martyr out of Tipu Sultan, who enjoyed the barbaric torture inflicted upon thousands and thousands of people of other faiths for not converting to Islam. The broader viewpoint is what they did to our history they do to these entitled prince and princesses of the Nehru Family.

Why does speaking about Rajiv Gandhi, who was a Prime Minister of our country wrong because it was during his regime:

1. The biggest genocide in Sikh history was carried out by his cronies on his orders, who were then rewarded with plum posts for their massacre not to forget his epic dialogue after that, “When a big tree falls, the ground shakes” conveniently forgetting the true maxim, which is of course “When the ground shakes even a big tree falls”. A big tree falls when its dead from the inside and has become hollow. Just a fact.

2. The shady underhanded dealings with respect to the Bhopal Gas Tragedy and how he let Warren Anderson out of the country and how the victims families were denied justice?

3. The Gandhi family’s Bofors Scam, which pulled down his regime and the Congress party, which boasted of 400+ seats up until then came down to 200 seats. His links to the Quatrochi family, the many shady deals involved in that deal are stuff of legend and crime writing! The psyche of the Defence sector was dented due to the greed of this one man.

People were afraid to purchase arms, which our Armed forces desperately needed and it only took the present government’s will and political commitment to upgrade our armed forces with latest weapons and munitions. That’s 30 years worth of blood thats on their hands and on the hands of especially Mr. Rajiv Gandhi.

4. I can list this entitled Prince’s many other monumental disasters starting with the slogan now his son uses “Gareebi Hatao”, but I will talk about his death. He was assassinated by a Suicide bomber from LTTE and the culprits were caught and punished. In fact the present dynasts were ready to forgive the men and women who plotted their father’s murder. But there is no denying the fact that he was killed by a faction for interference in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka by sending help to the Government of Sri Lanka. The merits or demerits can be debated. But his assassination has nothing to do with how he ruined our country and left a culture of nepotism and corruption in his wake.

So once again, what is wrong in talking about a man, who by all means was portrayed as a paragon of virtue by his cronies and his many sins were brushed under the carpet, but was in fact the father of corruption that ultimately reduced the Congress to double digit seats in 2014?

When the Prime Minister of the world’s largest democracy, who was elected on a popular mandate with 282 seats, can be ridiculed, abused and be called Chor without any basis of proof or evidence and his family who don’t have any ties with their son can be dragged through the mud, why can’t we question the ex-Prime Minister who died under a cloud of corruption and whose party and whose dynasts are synonymous with corruption?

What gives them this sense of entitlement? Do they think that this is the era of lies and propaganda? Do they think this is their Kingdom and we are their subjects? Do they live in a democracy? All these questions can be answered by the statement of Mr. RaGa, another entitled prince that the Congress and its ecosystem burdened our country with, where he says that the Prime Minister of our country has no right to talk about a martyr and it was despicable!

Despicable, wasn’t it? When you went on to say that you want to destroy the image of an incorruptible man.Talking about your father’s despicable past isn’t! Death does not wash away the misdeeds of a person because if that were true as per RaGa’s analogy even Hitler needs to be respected!

Please stop teaching this country who to respect and who not to, dear entitled Prince and Princess and your coterie of misfits because you have lost that right the moment you pushed this country into ruins, strife and civil and economic degradation.

So shut your mouth or if you want to open it accept our Prime Minister’s challenge and make the next two phases about your father and lets see what the people will tell you.

So martyr or not everyone in this country has a right to talk about the father of modern day Congress corruption Mr. Rajiv Gandhi!

See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil.

A teaching of Mahatma Gandhi which seems to be all but forgotten in today’s time and phase. However, true to the heritage, Congress party seems to be the only political party which still carries the flag of the ‘Gandhi’ legacy as well as his teachings to heart.

Congress of today is still a true follower of ‘Gandhi(s)’, although the current lot carrying the ‘Gandhi’ title bear no resemblance or relation to the original one. That does not deter Congress in applying the preachings of the original Gandhi to the current namesakes.

See No Evil : Involvement of a Gandhi dynast in evil is well documented. Right from Nehru, the Chinese compatriot- Indira, the emergency queen – Sanjay, the vasectomy specialist – Rajiv, the Bhopal/Sikh/Srilanka massacre architect – Sonia, queen bee of corruption – Priyanka, land mafia to Rahul, blackop(erative) specialist. The Gandhi dynasty has indulged in all kinds of evil, however true to their belief, Congress party cadre has essentially always turned a blind eye to any and all act of evil from the Gandhi’s.

Speak No Evil : Even if someone incites you to speak up about the evil deeds of the Gandhis, make sure you put up bravado in countering them with false narratives. No Congressi will speak about the Evils, no matter what.

Hear No Evil : Turn deaf whenever someone speaks to you about the Evils of the Gandhis. If required, dont just act deaf, but act like a brainless psychopath with no sense or sensibilities. However, come what may, do not listen to any rhyme or reason which tries validating the evils of the Gandhis.

Even Mahatma Gandhi might not have imagined that his preaching will survive the test of times as well as they did in the Congress party. However, Has it lost its relevance in today’s world? Or are we interpreting the same correctly?

The need of the hour is to See Evil, To Speak about Evil and to Hear About Evil. We can no longer afford to ignore Evil deeds being performed around us. We need act against it, we need to raise our voice, spread the word about the deed as far as possible and ensure it gets punished so that no one ever dares conducting a ghastly act again.

In hindsight, maybe the great Mahatma could have added another phrase to his preaching : Do no Evil. This diktat could have helped Congressis stay clear of the all too apparent downward spiral – political as well as moral – that they find themselves into.

The cost of moving from an Indian concept of Dharma to a foreign concept of Secularism

0

In last 70 odd years since Independence, due to multiple reasons like Partition of India along the religious lines, rise of Islamist terror, increase in the followers of leftist and socialist ideologies, appeasement politics, revival of Hindu identity, and others; we have seen our political discourse being completely hijacked by Secularism and Communal-ism.

If we look at the TV debates, political speeches, news reported, and even talk to people around, secularism seems to be the prism from which everything is looked at. And what is secularism? Well, sorry to disappoint you but this word was added in the constitution during the emergency without any discussions so we don’t have the fortune of referring to any material or quotes by any of the leaders of the time.

We can only look at the circumstantial evidence of last 40 years since that time and take help from the great leaders of the past to understand what it has come to mean.

Let’s, for a moment, forget about the blatant appeasement politics played by different political parties to create their vote banks by giving-in to all the demands of a certain sections of minorities like the Maulvis, Preachers, Missionaries, Religious heads; who had huge influences among their communities. Politicians usually tend to go with whatever can give them votes, forgetting about the long term consequences of their actions.

But if we look at the intellectual sphere and civil society, which is mostly dominated by leftists and people with vested interests, the situation is no better. Everyone is trying to propagate their propaganda and paint every action or decision as communal or secular.

Whether it is a murder of an innocent over seat sharing, or the deaths of cattle smugglers by the hands of angry villagers and farmers, or something as black and white as illegal immigrants; everything is painted from the brush of secularism. Whether it is something as small as vandalism at a religious place, or as big as Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB), secularism is the only discourse people seem to be discussing about.

The situation has become so bad that this discourse and mindset is now percolating to the very roots of our society. Many of the people from the Muslim community can be seen repeating the rhetoric of “BJP and Narendra Modi being communal” without being able to give any specific example for that in these last 5 years. They admit that they have received benefits through government schemes and appreciate the governance provided but don’t want to see the current government come back to power because they see them as anti-Muslims. The same thinking seem to prevail in other minority communities and even in majority one, though to a very lesser extent.

But why is that the case? Why good work seems to evaporate in front of an imaginative secularism? More importantly, what do people understand by secularism and communal-ism?

India, being the oldest surviving civilization and a land of believers, has been the home for the people of different faiths, many communities which have been executed world over have found refuge and acceptance in India alone, has been the land where many ideologies and religions originated without any violence or persecution. This says something about the cultural and moral values, Sanskar, of the people of this country.

However, as it turned out, our rulers had too much contempt for ancient Indian values, so they turned their face towards the west to borrow their concepts to build a new India, after centuries of foreign rule. Secularism was one of them. In the west, it meant the separation of the state and the religion, made necessary due to the practice of running the state as a religious fiefdom by the religious heads, irrespective of the ruler on the seat of power.

In India, however, it manifested itself as anti-Hindu and in some cases, anti-India. This is what happens when you borrow a foreign concept which has no resonance among the general masses. Everyone starts to perceive it in its own way but nobody understands it, let alone relate to it through his life experiences which formulates the way of our thinking.

We need to move to the Indian concept of Dharma, if we want to get out of this mess. Dharma is not about religion, it is about social conduct. Everyone has a different Dharma depending upon the role he or she has in the society. Dharma is different for a ruler than for a peasant, it is different for a Brahman (knowledgeable) than for a warrior.

Dharma is not religion specific. It is about right and wrong, and deciding what is right and wrong irrespective of one’s religion, caste, gender, or any other identities.

Giving citizenship to religiously persecuted minorities from Pakistan and Bangladesh, is not about secularism, but about following Dharma. Supporting the law on Triple Talaq is not about meddling in one’s religion but about being on the right side of Dharma. Similarly, asking to build a Ram Mandir at Ram Janambhoomi is not asserting Hindu dominance over Muslims but about correcting a huge Adharma from the past.

Multiple school of thoughts and philosophies originated and flourished in India but none resorted to violence or threat of violence to enhance their acceptance or assert their dominance. The reason being it was seen as Adharma to do that. It had nothing to do with religion, or rituals, or practices. Dharma is about social justice and is not a religion specific concept.

Until, we get rid of these blindly borrowed foreign concepts and revert back to our old Indian concepts that have proved to be the most effective in building a just society, we will continue to see the people being divided along the secular and communal lines.

Why isn’t India clean till now?

0

Ours is a federal country, which means that it boasts of both the center and state having powers to rule and govern, although not symmetrical. It has been inherited from the Canadian based model of federalism and hence has a central bias.

But what most tend to forget is that 73rd and 74th amendment brought in a legal third tier, dealing with both Municipal Corporation and the Panchayati Raj.

While the central government mostly controls the important aspects of defense, communication, foreign policy, and currency, the state governments have control over the agriculture, law and order and education. The third tier, on the other hand, deals with the various facets of sanitation, water supply, drainage, and maintenance of water bodies.

You must have heard a lot of enthusiasm among the people who care about nationalistic issues, ranging from national security, corruption at the center, employment, and fiscal policy. In fact, people also care a lot about state-level issues like agriculture, especially with the recent political scoring on the issue of loan waiver. But do we really care about the municipality elections? If we are in a rural area, the most we care about is “who” is going to give us “what”, and this “what” is mostly in monetary terms.

I have overheard my elders in my maternal uncle’s village “investing” money to win local Panchayati elections. The cost? Mostly Rs. 2000 per household, along with a gold chain and new clothes for children. This is the only cost that big parties have to bear. While this may be a big amount for the beneficiaries, the bigger parties who are able to afford it, find it the best ticket that they have to earn more in future, a kind of an investment.

Most people don’t even know the candidates from local elections in urban areas. While we get a holiday to vote for general elections, the private firms where the villagers and the urban poor mostly work and are heavily influenced by the local level politics are never given any paid holidays for the same. Then come the urban middle class, who seldom care about the local issues.

While the government in the center can influence the local governments, they cannot have control over the execution part. The center can lay plans, but the execution depends on the local administration and executive appointees like the SDM and BDO.

While fighting for national independence and post it, the major focus of our country was in stabilizing the nation which was divided into different chunks of heterogeneous powers into one powerful entity – the idea of India. Thanks to strong leaders like Sardar Vallabhai Patel, we were able to integrate these smaller provinces into the Indian union. Looking at the middle east and African countries make us wonder about the geographical turmoil that they still hold, not being able to overcome the failures of the governance issues left by the Britishers, along with the constant civil wars thanks to differences in the version of their Islamic interpretation.

Post the integration of the nation with constant hiccups from the failed foreign policy with China and Pakistan because of the pseudo-liberal policy of Nehru, came the issue of food. The skewed and anti-farming policies of the British which were consistently neglected by the Indian National Congress pre-independence (only until they realized that peasants could be a center-point to their struggle against the British, resulting in accepting All India Kisan Sabha’s agenda in 1936) had left the agriculture sector in anguish and suffering. Awful taxation methods like the Permanent Settlement, tinkathia system which screwed up the motivation of farmers to grow edible crops and hence were forced to grow plantation crops like Indigo pushed the farmer’s income down by ladders.

The focus on food started in the last ’60s, as the existential period of famine in the 1940s had left a crippled population deprived of a basic necessity like grain. While the newly formed democratic government in the center post the first elections had the priority over farming in the first five-year plan, it could never actualize until came the “Jai Jawan Jai Kisan” motivated Prime Minister, Late Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri. It was thanks to his Green Revolution that we became self-sufficient in matters of food.

Then came the need to prioritize defense to fight the external threats. Many small countries “rented” out their countries in exchange for money and security for a while. Pakistan got billions of dollars to rent out bases to the Americans and later to the Chinese. Sri Lanka had done the same. While this brought the short-term money, it didn’t bring the countries prosperity as such and hence while Sri Lanka suffered from devastating civil war situations, Pakistan became a hub of terrorism.

We, on the other hand, remained free from the clutches of the hegemonic powers of those times and tried to build ourselves as a nuclear power with a vision to have bargaining power in the later times. We stayed off from the Non-Proliferation Treaty, Nuclear Suppliers Group came out as a result of our nuclear programme, but we didn’t give up on the increasing pressure from abroad. We fought against Pakistan in the meantime and won. Our priority was set then too – we couldn’t compromise on national security. To avoid further wars, we invested a lot in our nuclear and space programs.

Can you imagine a Rwanda or a Namibia to focus on building their nuclear arsenal? Did they have a necessity of focusing on building their own version of Outer Space Treaty? Were the much prosperous and terror-free bordered Scandinavian countries more concerned about national security issues from a rivalry in the region or more focused on building human indices? A simple analysis will tell you they were obviously focused on the latter. We couldn’t. Our priorities were different. How can we build ourselves if there was no one left in the first place?

After a successful run with the pressing issues of national security at that time was a focus on increasing menace of epidemics. We eradicated Smallpox. We have also eradicated Polio and Guinea worm. We nearly won the war on AIDS Epidemic, although that still continues and is on high priority of the government in power. We even fought and became free of unheard of diseases like Yaws in the previous decade, and could achieve this feat in a matter of years. We became a hub of generic medicine of the world.

We invested in building satellites. We invested in building a strong force like the NDRF and focused on mitigation measures. That is why the death toll is one of the lowest for this year’s Cyclone Fani.

Back in 1991, we focused on coming out from the clutches of a crippled economy from the shambles of a socialist regime. We successfully came out of it and now are one of the fastest growing economies in the world. Many countries like Argentina, Russia, Pakistan came at the verge of bankruptcy while we survived. Greece couldn’t. South East Asia couldn’t back in 1998. But we did.

We have made it a priority of giving back to terrorism now. We have come out clean with our talks with respect to terrorism. We gave it back to Pakistan, the release of IAF Wing Commander Abhinandan was not a gift as claimed by the liberal media.

Now, while the world focuses on terrorism, with the rising concern in the Western countries and even in countries like Norway, Sweden, and France scoring high in Global Peace Index, we are able to defy all skeptic voices on account of our preparedness to a terrorist attack. The most recent one is how we have managed to conduct both IPL and General Elections at the same time.

India didn’t always have the gratification of having strong leaders at the center. We have now started to focus on cleanliness – but it would sure take time. Ours is not a dictatorship, rather a federal democracy with each tier having its own voice. We built a liberal democracy, most end up being monarchies and suffering from a disillusioned crowd of numb people run by a psychopath. Most become a banana republic but we didn’t. Most countries like China bans diversity, we don’t.

Our priorities have been right. Because it has always been dependent on the scenarios back then. But before we blame the government for all the flaws in society, especially with regards to cleanliness, we should think of our own responsibilities.

Do we vote for local elections? Do we have our agendas set? Do we have a clear roadmap for what we prioritize? Do we not need to do our own bit in keeping our own surrounding clean first?

Maybe with time, as came the ticket cancellation charges, will come a time where the culprits are punished for littering on road.

Taking the longer, tougher, yet the prioritized road is the solution.

Nitish Singh

Orissa gesture of Modi and Mamta’s cruel response, save India elect Modi

The uncommon goodness of Modi towards the state of Orissa and West Bengal in the aftermath of Fani cyclone disaster shall remain eternal in the annals of Indian politics and no Prime Minister in the history of Independent India has shown such an exemplary, impartial, nonpartisan, true Indian-ized leadership character like Modi. 

In the middle of poll campaign, Modi made sufficient time to visit all the cyclone affected areas in Orissa, offered solace and support, granted 1000 crore to the state and above all praised lavishly the Chief Minister of Orissa for the exemplary precautionary measures taken by the state to save the life of millions of people and minimize the damage. 

Narendra Modi is contesting the election against Navin Patnaik, the chief minister of Orissa. BJD of Navin Patnaik is losing ground in Orissa mainly due to the aggressive growth of BJP and ever growing popularity of Modi in the state of Orissa. But when people of the state face crisis due to natural calamities like Fani Cyclone, help and support must come first to people and not seeking and begging vote or politicizing the agony of people for vote is the culture Modi always follow.

In fact Modi has inspired millions of people and one such leader too got inspired by Modi is the chief minister of Orissa; who also showed high and spirited level of statesmanship during Modi’s visit to Orissa to meet people who were affected by Fani Cyclone.

Navin Patnaik showed exemplary leadership skill and people of India certainly believe that it was Modi who influenced several leaders to rise above petty politics when people of the state face crisis.

LOOK AT THE CONTRAST, HOW CHEAP AND CRUEL WAS THE RESPONSE OF MAMATA BANEERJE, THE CHIEF MINISTER OF WEST BENGAL TO THE CALL OF MODI. 

MODI TRIED TO REACH OUT TO PEOPLE OF WEST BENGAL THROUGH MAMATA BUT SHE WAS MORE INTERESTED IN PETTY POLITICS AND NOT IN THE WELFARE OF THE STATE EVEN DURING THE HOUR OF CRISIS. 

Modi has always shown high level of statesmanship, patriotism, safety and security of India, focused on development, sab ka vikas and worked tirelessly to make the dignity of India fly high.

The question before the people of West Bengal is that still they have chance to save the state.

The only question they should answer is whether they should support Mamata who knows only to play petty politics and let lose goons to rampage all civility, flourish corruption and nepotism, spit venom of hatred, minority appeasement and promote hate Modi campaign or people of West Bengal should support Modi who is known for good and honest governance, development and sab ka vikas.

Time is up, people of West Bengal must support Modi unconditionally, both to save their future and also the state from the venomous rule of TMC.

The so called impartial journalists under the pay list of the dynast and naamdaar, self-appointed guardians of secularism and the corrupt forces when criticize Modi for poll code violation, virtually show their heartless state when comes to appreciate Modi for the ‘true and honest’ leadership character.

Those in the pay list of the dynast cannot be blamed for why they don’t appreciate Modi for his great and divine gesture in Orissa because all they know is the dynast and how to praise him.  They have never seen good governance, corruption and scam free administration, development centric governance, sab ka vikas, national security, governance free of nepotism etc.  Therefore they treat Modi to be an alien. According to the lobby, the person who can lead the country must have great tradition of corruption and scam, minority appeasement, divisiveness and the development of own dynasty than India. 

Whereas Modi is very outstanding, born honest, born patriot, born to save India and achieve sab ka vikas, the fear and nightmare of terrorists and traitors.

Save India, elect Modi should be the mantra people should chant, spread and follow. India is facing a great danger from the agglomeration all corrupts.  The syndicate of corruption wants to capture power to loot the nation. 

Modi is like the real chowkidar protecting the country from all those looters. That is why the captain and pilot of corruption and scam in India, the dynast is abusing Modi and calling him chowkidar chor.

The dynast has every reason to fear and feel threatened by chowkidars because the chowkidars are the one who are preventing him from looting India. Therefore the reason for his anger against chowkidar is obvious and that is why he is keep abusing chowkidar.

After the clandestine call of Modi, all most every Indian voluntarily turns to be the chowkidar for India and have decided to pack off all the looters from Indian politics.

Chowkidar Ranganathan

What makes Narendra Modi such an effective communicator?

0

We have not seen a more popular leader than Narendra Modi for a very long time, perhaps never in the independent history of India. Such has been his popularity that wherever he goes; whether its UP, Bengal Maharashtra, Gujarat Assam, or even Kerala; people gather in large numbers to listen to him, to see him.

Narendra Modi seems to connect with people at a personal level. He is not a great poet, certainly not the best of orators, but that does not lessens the impact he leaves on the listeners. The barriers of language, gender, age, caste, community – all seem to break when it comes to his connection with the people.

So, what makes him such an effective communicator? How is he able to generate so much passion among millions of people? How is he able to connect with the people at a personal level?

This can be a big research topic in itself, like most of the things he does.

But I think it all boils down to two things – his massive pool of knowledge about India and her civilization, and second, his ethos and values which any child receives who comes from a poor or middle class background.

So when he speaks, he does not have to use any pre-written speeches and is free to use his hands and facial expression to match his words and feelings, which makes the words even more effective. Many a times, he speaks like he is having a conversation with the people. And he has something to offer to everyone while conversing.

He can talk as easily to a housewife whose entire life is about doing a tough job of managing a household, as to a professional sitting on a high post. He can communicate as easily with small traders and businessmen as with a farmer or a daily wager. He can converse as easily with powerful world leaders as with a small kid.

This is an amazing ability to be able to talk to people from every walk of life, all having very diverse issues and world view.

Most of us get brought up with Indian values but as we grow old, many of us tend to forget the lessons and values learned in the past. We remain mostly concerned with the present and worried about the future. On the other hand, Narendra Modi seems to accumulate and assimilate all the life lessons, all the values that he has received since childhood.

In a recent interview with Rajat Sharma in “Aap Ki Adalat”, if you listen to his reply regarding Captain Abhinandan, Balakot and Pakistan; you would forget that he is talking about something as serious as National Security. And its not because he wants to get a few laughs or applause, but he likes to break it down to a very basic level so that everyone can understand.

For example, he said regarding Balakot air strikes that “Pakistan had put a lot of force on the ground because of the surgical strikes that happened last time, so we went from the air like Bajrang Bali.” He made his decision sound so simple. No need to complicate things and overthink them to make them bigger than they are. It does not mean that he does not go through each and every detail while deciding or executing something. He is able to break down his decision making process, his thinking process to such a level that anyone can understand and relate to it.

His image of an honest politician who more often than not, keeps his promises. He tends to speak up his mind and there is a consistency in his position regarding different issues, which makes it easier for him to not come across as hypocrite most of the times, like it is the case with most of the politicians most of the time. His journey from a poor kid to the most powerful seat of the country is an inspirational story irrespective of your ideology and politics.

All these things make him a package when he speaks to the people. People not just listen to Narendra Modi but they listen to the man with all these qualities and traits. If you are already in awe of someone’s character or personality, you tend to listen to him more intently. Also, the content of the message is more important than the way it is delivered.

That’s what makes him such an effective communicator. He is able to communicate his message directly to the common man in a way that he understands.

Curious case of the treatment of the deads by Indian people and congress-left-liberal ecosystem

0

Prime Minister stoked a controversy recently by saying “Rajiv Gandhi died as the Bharastachari No.1”. Opposition leaders, as expected, got united in slamming the PM with some terming it as an insult of a ‘martyr’, some accusing him of lowering the public discourse and some considered it as disrespecting the dead.

There is no denying the fact that the biggest majority government of Rajiv Gandhi was the most corrupt government in the history of independent India, perhaps only rivaled by the UPA-2 government. Bofors scam, genocide of Sikhs, exodus of Kashmiri Pandits, Bhopal gas tragedy, Shah Bano case, uprising of armed conflicts in many states, terror outbreak in J&K; there is a long list of corruption under his tenure. Remember corruption is not only related to money but also includes corruption of values and intentions. He himself admitted that about 85% of the government money gets lost to corruption by the middlemen and bureaucrats, such was the level of rampant corruption during his era.

As the fate had it, he was killed in a suicide bombing attack by LTTE terrorists, soon after he lost the elections. Can he be considered a ‘martyr’? Sure he can. After all he was killed in a terrorist attack by foreign nationals who wanted to take revenge for his policies in the neighboring country during his tenure; it does not matter whether the policies were popular or not, whether the policies were right or not; he was the elected representative and his policies were the policies of India at the time. So he was killed due to India’s policies in a foreign country and that should be enough to consider him as a ‘martyr’.

However, that begs the question whether the death of a person washes off all the sins he has committed when he was alive? Should we spare the criticism of his policies and conduct just because we was killed in a terrorist attack? Similar question gets raised when we talk about Hemant Karkare and his role in the fabricated ‘Hindu Terror’ theory.

Under Indian traditions, since times immemorial, we are taught to respect the dead and refrain from bad-mouthing them irrespective of their character and crimes. The sins of the person cease to exist with his death. It is now upto DharamaRaj to take a stock of his actions and crimes.

Many of the leaders with dubious past have been made into heroes and legends by the Congress-Left ecosystem, taking advantage of this continued ancient practice by the Indians, be it Jawahar Lal Nehru, Indira Gandhi, Buddhadev Bhattacharya, or many others. When someone dares to question them or their policies, he is labeled as uncouth and intolerant who does not have respect for India’s icons!

This is not democracy. One should be allowed to criticize and question anyone one wants to, based on facts and figures. One should not be mocking or insulting the death but one can always question the decisions and the intentions behind them, taken by them when they were alive. It might be religiously wrong but totally legitimate in a democracy, specially in ours which is a secular one.

We need to modify this ancient practice of ours which views every legitimate criticism of the dead ones as derogatory and disrespectful. Death does not give you immunity from your behavior and conduct when you were alive, not in a democracy. When the society and the people do not have the same level of intellect and integrity as in the distant past, we cannot blindly follow the same principles from that era.

Till the time, we keep following the same principles, we will keep having these false heroes thrust upon us by the congress-left-liberal ecosystem. Mahatama Gandhi would become the ‘Father of the Nation’; Jawahar Lal Nehru would lovingly become ‘Chacha Nehru’; Indira Gandhi would become ‘Iron Lady’; and Rajiv Gandhi would become the ‘visionary who brought technology and computers’ to India.

Rajiv Gandhi was the leader of the most corrupt and incompetent government that India has ever seen. This is a reality and no, saying the same, does not amount to disrespecting the dead.

Will Mayawati be the next PM?

0

The parliamentary elections are yet not completed but the clever, shar-witted politicians have their own designs. Their ambitions have been crystallizing in their computer-like minds. If the oldest political party does not come to the total of seats required to form the government, its leader Rahul Gandhi would definitely not be the prime minister. This was even cleared by Kapil Sibbal, a senior leader.

The saffron party looks confident of forming the government once again as Ram Madhav has categorically indicated in recent days.

Among all the leaders of the opposition the Bahujan Samaj Party leader Mayawati is assuming a distinct but glorious idea of becoming the country’s next prime minister. She says, “If all goes well, I may have to seek election from here because the road to national politics passes through Ambedkar Nagar.” Her deep-rooted idea appears to have come before us. She is too ambitious now. Whatever was earlier made known to the public was now gradually becoming clear. She had won the Lok Sabha seat from this constituency four times. She first won the election in the year 1989, again in the year 1998, further in the year 1999 and later in the year 2004.

Like so many other women politicians she also has a desire to reach the top of the political authority in the biggest democratic country. She could not stop looking in that direction. Waiting for the ultimate goal was very much important for her at present. It was not wholly different from her other big thinking. If she happens to grab the prime ministerial seat she would define the political history in a new way. What had not been rachieved by a tall leader like Jagjiwan Ram would possibly take shape now.

The time is changing and the politics could also change after the month. Just as the fast rising temperature of the Summer disturbs the general populace so as the politicians’ hear beat continues to fluctuate until the results are cleared finally.

Let us know the definition of ‘Martyr’……. Save India, elect Modi

Hinduism is one of the oldest living and practicing civilizations in the world. Whatever is present in the world and likely to occur in distant future, have been eloquently elaborated and copiously expressed in the sacred ancient Sanskrit scriptures of Hinduism like Mahabharat, Ramayana, Upanishad, Vedas etc.

Ravana, Kamsa, Hiranyakashipu etc., are referred in the ancient scriptures of Hinduism as associates of Lord but due to their sins, they had to come to earth as Ravan, Kamsa and Hiranyakashipu. But still Hinduism and Hindus never call RAVAN, KAMSAA AND HIRANYAKASHIPU AS MARTYR. Instead, all of them are called only as evil forces and demons for their heinous actions against humanity, when they were in power.

Moral of the story is that because someone dies naturally or gets assassinated, would not become martyr nor because they were killed, would earn them the title ‘martyr’.

Indian voters must recognise the above truth before they cast their vote or engage in any debate on whether the reference of Rajiv Gandhi as chor No.1 by Modi, when Modi was unbundling Bofors scam is appropriate or not.

Historical facts should not be mutilated; distorted or conveniently misrepresented is the political philosophy of Modi and BJP. The historical facts are that Rajiv Gandhi faced the biggest allegation called Bofors scam. Several millions of rupees have been transferred as kickbacks are true but some facts could not be established in the court of law beyond any reasonable doubt due to time laps. However, money trail and other evidences of big scam were quite evident. During the election campaign, Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated by suicide bombers of LTTE in Tamil Nadu, several years ago. Even the sympathy wave of Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination could not save congress party and party could not get simple majority in the parliament.

Rajiv Gandhi died with deep scar of Bofors allegation and even after his death, none of the evidences are accused to be concocted or fabricated but are true and pointing vividly towards Bofors scam really did happen, although proving it now may be difficult. It means, even after the death of Rajiv Gandhi, he had to carry the mark of Bofors scam and even recently certain new facts about Bofors scam has emerged linking the Italian family to be the main culprit.

When the dynast was shouting about the honest Modi as chor, merchant of death, villain of Godhra carnage etc., even after all courts of India exonerating Modi with a clear judgment that Modi has no role in any of those incidents, but still the corrupt dynast continued his abuses against Modi without any decency. The moment Modi replied, not only the family but the entire opposition is reacting heavily because what he spoke was truth. Truth is bitter and that is why many are getting worked up. But when the dynast utters nonsense and abuses Modi, no one bothered because of two reasons

  1. Every political party in India as well as in the world know the dynast naamdar is a liar and unwise
  2. The claim of dynast naamdar is utter lie and if the dynast is believed or supported would prove disastrous.

But the situation became different when Modi hits back. When Modi hit back at the dynast naamdaar, Indian and world know Modi is a credible leader, speak only truth and walk the path of dharma. The resounding reply of Modi has rattled the dynast and the Italian family and therefore the entire opposition parties find it difficult to bear truth. All these tukde tukde gangs are swimming in the pool of lies and scams, therefore are getting jittered with Modi.

Rajiv Gandhi died with the scar of Bofors scam is a well-known and proven fact. Narendra Modi just reminded the dynast to look at his own family history and tradition of scams before the dynast throws dirt at Modi.

India not only believes Modi, are with Modi, want Modi to continue as Prime Minister of India and save India from the sinking dynasty of corruption and loot.

Liars, corrupts, loots, dynasts, naamdaars, punkah coolies and sycophants of the dynast, all have come together to defeat India and not Modi. 

People of India must remember the truth that Modi alone can save India and achieve sab ka vikas. Let us pledge our vote to save India by electing Modi and not the dynast or his corrupt cohorts.

Chowkidar Ranganathan