Monday, April 6, 2020
Home Opinions Curious case of the treatment of the deads by Indian people and congress-left-liberal ecosystem

Curious case of the treatment of the deads by Indian people and congress-left-liberal ecosystem

Also Read

Prime Minister stoked a controversy recently by saying “Rajiv Gandhi died as the Bharastachari No.1”. Opposition leaders, as expected, got united in slamming the PM with some terming it as an insult of a ‘martyr’, some accusing him of lowering the public discourse and some considered it as disrespecting the dead.

There is no denying the fact that the biggest majority government of Rajiv Gandhi was the most corrupt government in the history of independent India, perhaps only rivaled by the UPA-2 government. Bofors scam, genocide of Sikhs, exodus of Kashmiri Pandits, Bhopal gas tragedy, Shah Bano case, uprising of armed conflicts in many states, terror outbreak in J&K; there is a long list of corruption under his tenure. Remember corruption is not only related to money but also includes corruption of values and intentions. He himself admitted that about 85% of the government money gets lost to corruption by the middlemen and bureaucrats, such was the level of rampant corruption during his era.

As the fate had it, he was killed in a suicide bombing attack by LTTE terrorists, soon after he lost the elections. Can he be considered a ‘martyr’? Sure he can. After all he was killed in a terrorist attack by foreign nationals who wanted to take revenge for his policies in the neighboring country during his tenure; it does not matter whether the policies were popular or not, whether the policies were right or not; he was the elected representative and his policies were the policies of India at the time. So he was killed due to India’s policies in a foreign country and that should be enough to consider him as a ‘martyr’.

- article continues after ad - - article resumes -

However, that begs the question whether the death of a person washes off all the sins he has committed when he was alive? Should we spare the criticism of his policies and conduct just because we was killed in a terrorist attack? Similar question gets raised when we talk about Hemant Karkare and his role in the fabricated ‘Hindu Terror’ theory.

Under Indian traditions, since times immemorial, we are taught to respect the dead and refrain from bad-mouthing them irrespective of their character and crimes. The sins of the person cease to exist with his death. It is now upto DharamaRaj to take a stock of his actions and crimes.

Many of the leaders with dubious past have been made into heroes and legends by the Congress-Left ecosystem, taking advantage of this continued ancient practice by the Indians, be it Jawahar Lal Nehru, Indira Gandhi, Buddhadev Bhattacharya, or many others. When someone dares to question them or their policies, he is labeled as uncouth and intolerant who does not have respect for India’s icons!

This is not democracy. One should be allowed to criticize and question anyone one wants to, based on facts and figures. One should not be mocking or insulting the death but one can always question the decisions and the intentions behind them, taken by them when they were alive. It might be religiously wrong but totally legitimate in a democracy, specially in ours which is a secular one.

We need to modify this ancient practice of ours which views every legitimate criticism of the dead ones as derogatory and disrespectful. Death does not give you immunity from your behavior and conduct when you were alive, not in a democracy. When the society and the people do not have the same level of intellect and integrity as in the distant past, we cannot blindly follow the same principles from that era.

Till the time, we keep following the same principles, we will keep having these false heroes thrust upon us by the congress-left-liberal ecosystem. Mahatama Gandhi would become the ‘Father of the Nation’; Jawahar Lal Nehru would lovingly become ‘Chacha Nehru’; Indira Gandhi would become ‘Iron Lady’; and Rajiv Gandhi would become the ‘visionary who brought technology and computers’ to India.

Rajiv Gandhi was the leader of the most corrupt and incompetent government that India has ever seen. This is a reality and no, saying the same, does not amount to disrespecting the dead.

- Support OpIndia -
Support OpIndia by making a monetary contribution

Latest News

India’s left liberals, the perennial Muslim-appeasers, are once again up in arms against Arnab Goswami

His tough stand regarding the Tablighi Jamaat meet at Nizamuddin Markaz has therefore faced the ire of left-liberals and Islamists masqueraded as journalists alike.

Let us invoke the Dunkirk spirit and the god principle

Modi depresses liberals yet another time for 5th April event. And people with slap them with its grand success!

Do not support ‘corona terrorism’ in the name of opposing Modi, we need Uniform Civil Code

Only by enacting Uniform Civil Code, we can save India from misuse of multi-privilege in the name of secularism.

The COVID-19 cases in India are about to surge and here’s what you need to know

Despite multiple efforts carried out by the Indian govet along with medicos and police, to contain the disease in the country; they are slightly on the losing side after the immature actions by certain parts of the society.

Why Tablighi Jamaat should be under scanner

it took the stature of National Security Advisor to plead before the Maulana Saad to vacate the premises. No one ever of this stature has negotiated directly even with terrorist or in hostile conditions.

Leadership in the time of crisis

A nation needs to repose belief in its leader during the times of crisis.

Recently Popular

An irresponsible state under the responsible state

Country's minority group must understand that majority group can not be only responsible for maintaining the communal harmony in a society.

कोरोना की भयावहता और भारतीय कानून

भारत सरकार की जैविक प्रबंधन आपदा के 2008 रिपोर्ट में कहा गया की 1897 की महामारी कानून सक्षम नहीं है एवं इसे बदलने की जरुरत है. यह कानून केंद्र को जैविक आपातकाल के दौरान ज्यादा शक्ति प्रदान नही करता.

Islamic fanaticism – Beyond the ignorance of COVID 19 & a desperate need for rejecting the ideology by Muslims

Islamic fanatics often through the theological and social control of the community are trying to hard oppose the social distancing & medical help being provided to them.

How Siddharth Varadarajan, editor of The Wire, defended heinous killers and slandered victims of the Godhra carnage

Siddharth Varadarajan implied in August 2004 that the post-Godhra riots would have happened even without Godhra!

Sikhs and CAA: Why CAA is the need of the hour for the Sikh community in Pakistan and Afghanistan

In need of the hour, the Indian Sikh community must extend their support to the CAA to ensure safety of their Pakistani and Afghani counterparts, so they can able to live a better life in India.