Home Blog Page 503

Savarkar phobia, the congenital behavioural disorder of the dynast of congress party

0

The recent statement of the dynast Raghul Gandhi venting out his inborn hatred towards one of the greatest nationalists and patriots of our freedom struggle and promoter of one India idea under our living heritage and culture called Hinduism- Vir Savarkar reveals nothing but the dynast is suffering from a serious Hindu phobia.

Savarkar is not just a freedom fighter but a true leader, guide and philosopher to millions of Indians and India always cherish the values and ethos of Savarkar like how Indians respect and value our constitution, Lord Ram and Lord Krishna.

The problem of dynast is multi-various. His inborn phobia towards Hinduism is well known. Always he has used pseudo-secular garb to cover his hatred agaisnt Hinduism but minority appeasement is always according to the dynast and his associates is part of promoting secular ideals.

It is so unfortunate that no one in the congress party is willing to give some common sense and political wisdom to the dynast and dissuade him from making statements that would demean the dignity of India and national icons like Savarkar. Just to mock at PM Modi and his great initiative called make in India to promote India as one of the global manufacturing hubs and destination of investors, the dynast has made a highly condemnable statement that India has become rape capital. To further his assault on to the dignity of Bharat mata, he has described Savarkar a coward and placed his ‘Gandhi’ dynasty over the glory and dignity of one our selfless freedom fighter – Savarkar. 

More bizarre aspect of the politics is that the striped cat – Shiv Sena instead of rising goose bump and its whiskers, has gone with mew, mew noise because Shiv Sena cannot criticise or question the dynast now and if Shiv Sene dare to do so, the supremo of Shiv Sena will lose his Chief Minister chair. The outcome of next Maharashtra assembly election is well known where Shiv Sena will be thrown out for its treacherous politics.

The most sickening fact is that no congress men really want to correct the dynast. Is it because the dynast cannot be corrected and therefore no one is attempting to do so is not clear. But such possibility cannot be ruled out. Already the congress party and Shiv Sena has dug own graveyard in Maharashtra politics and ensure it further, the congress party wants to re-incarnate the dynast as its president. To facilitate his re-coronation, the party has set up a forum with the hope that the dynast would behave more maturely. But the dynast cannot change nor can learn any decency.  All he knows is to lie and abuse and make high decibel noise with the hope that India would cherish him one day.  No Indian would ever respect the dynast because none of his conducts is going attract any respect or support of people of India.

His frustrations and pains against Modi are well known. Modi is working against corruption, nepotism, dynastic politics, divisive and minority appeasement politics, politics of sycophancy and more so focusing on development of the nation than one family as in the case of congress party. Therefore the dynast has more than one reason to hate and abuse Modi because Modi stands for India and not for one family as in the case of congress party. Another problem of the dynast is that he is yawning for respect and dignity in Indian politics but he hardly finds both either for himself or for his party.  Whereas the respect and support base of Modi is ever growing. Modi is respected by millions and millions of people because of his in born honesty and patriotic spirits and on the contrary people dislike and mock the dynast because of his inborn hatred for Hinduism and immature and undignified politics.

People of India must give a fitting reply to the dynast and his congress party and the party must be eliminated through democratic norms and only then India can be saved.  No Indian can ever forgive or forget the insult the dynast has inflicted upon our divine leader, icon, soul and spirit of Hinduism – Savarkar.

Let us pledge our unconditional support to Modi and Amit Shah to make India a great country free from corruption, dynastic politics and negativity.
Jai Hind.

CAB is for India; not for Indians

0

Fellow Indians.

Have you really read the CAB act?

No! right?

I will help you understand it in one line. It’s for persecuted minorities of our 3 neighbors.

Muslims in those countries are a majority.

I know then you will say what about Ahmadiyas or other branches of Islam which have faced violence?

It’s a sectarian violence which have happened in some small pockets and rest of that country is safe for them to stay. Such violence has taken place in India as well, like violence against North Indians in Mumbai. Will you declare entire country unsafe for North Indians and expect an US citizenship for them?

What are we talking here? A Hindu or Sikh woman is unsafe everywhere across those countries. They have been forced converted, raped, killed, kidnapped. There is no comparison in these two situations.

And let’s say if there is a merit in some cases to give citizenship to majority community e.g. Tarek Fateh, Taslima Nasreen. There is already a system in place and they can opt for it.

And we are here talking only about giving citizenship. If they are not citizens that doesn’t mean they’ll be thrown out of this country. They will still stay here as refugees.

Then what is the problem? Why is this outrage?

And the most important point is this act doesn’t affect any Indian Muslim or Indian Hindu. Why are you breaking your own house for this?

And finally to those who are making this superficial argument like this is the idea of Jinnah. Jinnah won today. We accepted two nation theory.

No!

Jinnah didn’t win today and he will never win. Jinnah created a country (actually 2) where minority have to flee their home/town for their life, where population of minority has reduced. Where as we built a country where we are accepting minorities from neighboring countries as well and minority population in India has grown from 10% to 14%.

At least make some sense.

ब्रिटिश चुनाव परिणाम का संदेश

0

योरोपियन यूनियन से बाहर होने के मुद्दे पर लड़े गए ब्रिटिश संसदीय चुनाव में प्रधानमंत्री बोरिस जॉनसन की बड़ी जीत ने लेफ्ट-लिबरल विचारों और तथाकथित प्रगतिशील विमर्श से प्रेरित मुद्दों की निरर्थकता एक बार फिर सिद्ध की है। यह चुनावी परिणाम साफ संकेत हैं कि बड़े-बड़े मीडिया गिरोहों, बौद्धिक संस्थानों, वामधारा से प्रदूषित अकादमिक मंचों द्वारा फैलाया गया वितण्डा एक चीज है और आम जनता के मूल्य, मानक, सोच और वास्तविकता बिल्कुल दूसरी चीज। जनता से कटे नैरेरिव का बार-बार ध्वस्त होना ऐसी घटनाएं है जो भारत मे नरेन्द्र मोदी, अमेरिका में डॉनल्ड ट्रंप और पूर्वी योरोप के कई देशों में वहाँ की राष्ट्रवादी और दक्षिणपंथी पार्टियों की जीत पर देखने को मिली हैं। परंतु इस बार ब्रिटिश चुनावी परिणाम एक अन्य कारण से भी प्रासंगिक हो उठा है जिसके गहरे भारतीय सन्दर्भ हैं और जिनकी चर्चा यहाँ करना समीचीन होगा।

इस बार कंजरवेटिव पार्टी की प्रचण्ड जीत ने वहाँ रह रहे भारतीय समुदाय को एक मजबूत प्रेशर ग्रुप और एकजुट वोटिंग ब्लॉक के रूप में स्पष्ट रूप से रेखांकित किया है। 650 सदस्यीय ब्रिटिश संसदीय सीटों में कंजरवेटिव पार्टी को 365 सीटें मिली हैं, वहीं विपक्षी लेबर पार्टी 203 पर सिमट गई है।

वैसे तो यह चुनाव मुख्यतः ब्रेक्जिट के मुद्दे पर प्रधानमंत्री बोरिस जॉनसन द्वारा पुनः जनादेश पाने की एक कवायद थी लेकिन ब्रिटिश हिन्दुओं के लिए यह चुनाव एक अन्य कारण से महत्वपूर्ण हो गया था। भारत में प्रधानमंत्री नरेन्द्र मोदी द्वारा कश्मीर से अनुच्छेद 370 को विदा करने के बाद से ही ब्रिटेन में जहाँ कंजरवेटिव पार्टी ने इसे भारत का आंतरिक विषय बताते हुए भारत और प्रधानमंत्री मोदी के साथ अपने अच्छे सम्बन्धों को बार-बार दोहराया वहीं दूसरी ओर लेबर पार्टी ने अनावश्यक रूप से अपने पार्टी सम्मेलन में कश्मीर मुद्दे पर प्रस्ताव पारित करते हुए अंतरराष्ट्रीय हस्तक्षेप की मांग की और भारत सरकार, भारतीय सेना और प्रधानमंत्री मोदी पर भी अनावश्यक और प्रतिकूल टिप्पणियाँ कीं। इस बेवकूफी भरे दुस्साहस का अगुआ रहा लेबर पार्टी का शीर्ष नेता जेरेमी कार्बिन। जेरेमी कॉर्बिन एक वाम झुकाव वाला इस्लामपरस्त लिबरल नेता है जिसकी तुलना आप अमेरिका की डेमोक्रेटिक पार्टी के बर्नी सैंडर्स जैसे समाजवादी लम्पटों से या भारत के किसी भी छँटे हुए सेकुलरबाज नेता से कर सकते हैं।

लेबर पार्टी के इस दुस्साहस ने भारतीय समुदाय को बुरी तरह चिढ़ाने का काम किया और ब्रिटिश हिन्दुओं ने भी इसे चुनौती के रूप में लिया। वहाँ ‘ओवरसीज फ्रेंड्स ऑफ बीजेपी’ नामक भाजपा समर्थक ब्रिटिश संगठन ने सभी भारतीयों को लेबर पार्टी के विरुद्ध एकजुट करना प्रारम्भ किया। उनका प्रयास रंग लाया और भारतीयों के बीच लेबर पार्टी और उसके नेता खलनायक बन गए। लेबर पार्टी के विरुद्ध इस ध्रुवीकरण को और बढ़ावा तब मिला जब कश्मीरी अलगाववादियों, खालिस्तानियों, जेकेएलएफ जैसे आतंकी संगठनों से जुड़े गुर्गे खुलेआम लेबर पार्टी के पक्ष में अभियान चलाने लगे और हद तो तब हो गई जब सोनिया-राहुल की कांग्रेस पार्टी ने भारत के विरुद्ध विषवमन करने वाली लेबर पार्टी के सम्मेलन के ठीक पश्चात अपना एक प्रतिनिधिमंडल लेबर पार्टी के नेताओं से मिलने के लिए भेज दिया। मानो लेबर पार्टी के भारत-विरोधी रुख पर जेरेमी कॉर्बिन को शाबासी देने के लिए कांग्रेसी व्याकुल हो उठे हों। खुद जेरेमी कॉर्बिन ने भी ट्वीट कर यह जानकारी दी कि कांग्रेस प्रतिनिधिमंडल से उसने कश्मीर में मानवाधिकारों की स्थिति पर चर्चा की। उक्त प्रतिनिधिमंडल में कांग्रेस से जुड़े कई प्रभावशाली लोग शामिल थे।

इन सभी घटनाओं ने भारतीय समुदाय को एकजुट होकर लेबर पार्टी को चुनाव में धूल चटाने के लिए प्रेरित किया। लेबर पार्टी के लगभग हर प्रत्याशी का भारतीय मूल के लोगों ने बहिष्कार किया। यहाँ तक कि उन लेबर प्रत्याशियों का भी, जो स्वयं भारतीय मूल के थे। कश्मीर पर कंजरवेटिव पार्टी का रुख भारत-समर्थक था अतः भारतीय समुदाय की रणनीतिक वोटिंग के सबसे बड़े लाभार्थी भी प्रधानमंत्री बोरिस जॉनसन ही बने।

यद्यपि इस चुनावी परिणाम का सारा श्रेय भारतीयों को देना आत्ममुग्धता होगी क्योंकि इस चुनाव के कुछ बड़े मुद्दे निश्चय ही दीगर थे परन्तु इससे भी इनकार नहीं किया जा सकता कि भारत-समर्थन बनाम भारत-विरोध के मुद्दे ने भी इस चुनाव में एक महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका निभाई है। प्रधानमंत्री मोदी की लगातार विदेश यात्राओं और विदेशों में जाकर भारतीयों को एकजुट कर उन्हें सम्बोधित करने के कार्यक्रमों ने विभिन्न देशों में भारतीय समुदाय की एक मजबूत लॉबी तैयार कर दी है जो अब अपना राजनीतिक असर भी दिखा रही है। ब्रिटिश राजनीति में भारत-समर्थक छवि वाले दल की विजय और भारत-विरोधी दल की पराजय ने एक बात मजबूती से स्थापित कर दी है कि अब भारतीय समुदाय की राजनीतिक उपेक्षा करना सम्भव नहीं रह जाएगा, साथ ही किसी भी राजनीतिक दल का भारत के प्रति रुख भी उसकी चुनावी सम्भावनाओं को बनाने या बिगाड़ने का काम करेगा।

एमसीयू वालो कुछ सीखो

अरे भाई माखनलाल चतुर्वेदी विश्वविद्यालय के छात्रों तुम भी कहा छोटी छोटी बातों को लेकर बैठ गए तिरंगा ही तो हटाया था, जाती के नाम पर ही तो बांटा था, पाक अधिकृत कश्मीर को भारत का हिस्सा ही तो नहीं बताया था यह सब कौनसी बड़ी बात है कल को हो सकता है माखनलाल चतुर्वेदी पत्रकारिता विश्वविद्यालय हटा कर राजीव गांधी या इंद्रा गांधी पत्रकारिता विश्वविद्यालय कर देंगे उसमें भी कौनसी बड़ी बात होगी!

छात्रों की जाती देखने वाले माखनलाल में भी सिर्फ “चतुर्वेदी” ही देखेगे क्योंकि अब भला वैचारिकता की इस लड़ाई में एक दिन माखनलाल चतुर्वेदी भी पराए हो जाएंगे क्योंकि कहा पुष्प की अभिलाषा जैसी राष्ट्रभक्ति से परिपूर्ण सारगर्भित कविताएं लिखने वाले महान कवि व पत्रकार माखन लाल चतुर्वेदी और कहा मैं भारत माता की जय नहीं बोलूंगी ऐसा अड़ियलपन दिखाने वाले विश्वविद्यालय के अतिथि विद्वान/ वक्ता वहीं अन्य घोर जातिवादी, यह विरोधाभास तो समझ से परे हैं।

चलो ये सब तो छोड़ो लेकिन यह कौनसा तरीका हैं चुप चाप बैठ के रघुपति राघव गा रहे हो विरोध प्रदर्शन के लिए इतना भी नहीं पता प्रदर्शन कैसे किया जाता हैं अरे सीखो कुछ जामिया वालो से कुछ उनकी तरह पत्थर फेंको कम से कम दो चार कर्मियों को घायल करो, बंगाल व दिल्ली में जैसे हो रहा है वैसे दो चार ट्रेनों में, बसों में आग बाग लगाओ, क्योंकि क्या तुम्हे नहीं पता ऐसे ही करने से तो देश की “सेक्युलर फैब्रिक” की रक्षा की जाती हैं। ऐसे ही करने से ही तो सेक्युलर जमात तुम्हारे साथ खड़ी होगी।

पर एक बात तो हैं तुममें वो जामिया, ए.म. यू., जे. एन. यू वाली बात नहीं है यह प्रोटेस्ट वगेरह इन पे ही छोड़ दो, इनका ही इस पे जन्मसिद्ध अधिकार है। महात्मा गाँधी पर भी इनका ही कॉपीराइट हैं अब बताओ तुमने इस शांतिप्रिय प्रोटेस्ट से क्या उखाड़ लिया। एक सेक्युलर पत्रकार का नाम बता दो जो तुम्हारे साथ खड़ा हो, कौन है जो तुम्हारी सुन रहा है इसलिए जाओ जाकर पत्थर फेंको, भारत माता को कुचलो तब जाकर शायद कोई तुम्हारी आवाज सुने। परन्तु तुमसे वह भी नहीं होगा तुम ऐसा सोच भी नही सकते क्योंकि तुम माखन लाल चतुर्वेदी की राष्ट्रवादी विचारधारा के साथ पले बढे हो पत्थर तो तुम कभी नहीं उठाओगे, ना ही अपने ही देश की संपत्ति को नुक़सान पहुंचाओगे। पत्रकारिता के छात्र हो कलम और आवाज ही उठाओगे वह भी सिर्फ और सिर्फ भारत हित में, राष्ट्र हित में क्योंकि यही तो अंतर है “भारत माता की जय” ऐसे नारो को आत्मसात करने में और इन्हे कहने में आनाकानी करने वाले लोगों में।

अनुलेख – इस लेख में वर्णित सभी तथ्य मीडिया रिपोर्ट्स पर आधारित हैं।

Is India finally on the right side of history?

0

From a utilitarian perspective, the subject of history might have no value except in academia. However, the right knowledge of history is extremely important for any civilization’s existence. The collective wisdom of our ancestors together with the vision they had for the civilization is essential to move it forward. We live only for a short span of fewer than 100 years. Thus, it is impossible to understand who we are unless there is a proper understanding of our history. If someone can not see the rationale in it, he is approaching history wrongly.

History teaches us who we are beyond what we can normally see of ourselves. It defines and shapes our present identity. It can only be ignored by someone at one’s own peril or by someone who does not value his identity. In India, history and hence identity is becoming increasingly pertinent and relevant as part of the national discourse.

Within Hinduism, ideally, there should be no clash between all-encompassing religious Hindu identity and sub-identities predicated on various cultures, traditions, languages, and castes. Unfortunately, due to Left dominance over the intellectual establishment and academia in India, schools and mendacious textbooks have taught very little of the glorious Hindu past or taught it terribly. As normally there is no other source to learn history, it is reflected in how people start hating their Hindu identity.

Nevertheless, the strength of Hinduism lies in its diversity, capacious enough to include people belonging to various identities. All these identities must operate and are valuable in different contexts and situations. The context is important but due to lack of faith and pride of being Hindu, it eludes many Hindus leading them to turn their strength into a weakness. And they choose to give more importance to ethnic, language or caste identity rather than all-inclusive religious Hindu identity. Furthermore, many deracinated Hindus decide to remain in isolation, unconcerned and focussed only on earning livelihood, trying to lead a good life and ignore what is happening around without realizing that it can not go on indefinitely because someone else who feels disconnected and does not relate with Hindus because of their identity might pose a threat to them or their future generations. Therefore, the past will continue to haunt the present no matter what Hindus opt for in present.

Thus, the true understanding of our history is crucial at this juncture as we continue to face a perpetual civilizational war for the last more than 1000 years. Notwithstanding, the ebbs and flows in the Indian society, the inevitability, and seriousness of the conflict become obvious as many other great civilizations fell to the barbaric desert cults masquerading as religions. Lessons should be learned from what happened in other parts of the world or even with us in 1947 so we don’t suffer the same fate again. The main reason for the destruction of other civilizations was the inability to consolidate power against the enemies. Ergo, political consolidation and a victory were crucial for Hindus which materialized with BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party) coming into power in 2014.

The upshot is that BJP has started proving its civilizational commitment with the Citizenship Amendment Bill and geopolitical and socio-religious responsibility with the defanging of Article 370 of the Constitution of India. Both of these actions address the historical wrongs committed against Hindus. With this acknowledgment, finally, it appears that we are on the right side of history. However, as history has no end, we would need to keep learning lessons that can judiciously deal with the present and future. Besides, these efforts could also be rendered futile unless the current approach of the Indian Government becomes part of a bigger shift in Indian politics and governance. It had become a norm due to Congress’s intentional amnesia that some things must not be said about history, while other things must be said. And they always swept sensitive issues under the carpet, consequently minimizing the scale and intent of Hindu massacres. Hindus continued to be made victims of the faux victimhood narrative.

Nevertheless, with the Indian Government’s strong stance, hopeful signs are on the horizon. The divides amongst Hindus are wide. But BJP which is the largest political party in the world can act as a bridge to unite them all by continuing its focus on other vital Hindu concerns which were largely absent from the policy agenda of the Indian Government until recently and pave the way for freeing Hindu temples from Government control, revising textbooks to reflect true Indic history and culture and amendment of Articles 29 and 30 along with repealing of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act (RTE) that can bring parity between various religions in education.

The big betrayal of refugees by the Left, Congress and Trinamul MPs from Bengal

0

The partition of the country left bitter memories of mental pain and physical agonies of the most excruciating type. The net outcome was about 2 mn death and 14 mn displaced.

The horrors in riots were of unimaginable magnitude and are examples of the most bestial, inhuman behaviour. Innocent men and women were cut to pieces and not only was the modesty of women folk violated, they were deliberately and violently physically and sexually assaulted. Families, to save the modesty of their women folk, were forced to commit desperate acts like throwing their women folk into the wells alive, preferring death to disgrace. This was the price they paid for our freedom, not only in blood but also in mutilation.

Millions of Hindus migrated to India from East Bengal. The majority of them settled in West Bengal. A smaller number went to Assam, Tripura and other states. In Bengal migration occurred in a gradual fashion and continued over the next three decades following partition. The 1951 census in India recorded 2.523 million refugees from East Bengal. Among them 2.061 million settled in West Bengal. The rest went to Assam, Tripura and other states. By 1973 their number reached over 6 million.

Such people in East Bengal had contributed immensely to India’s freedom movement. Two instances would suffice.

Anushilan Samiti  was a Bengali Indian organisation that supported revolutionary violence as the means for ending British rule in India. The organisation arose from a conglomeration of local youth groups and gyms (akhara) in 1902. It had two prominent, somewhat independent, arms in East and West Bengal, Dhaka Anushilan Samiti (centred in Dhaka, modern day Bangladesh), and the Jugantar group (centred at Calcutta). The Samiti’s violent and radical philosophy revived in the 1930s, when it was involved in the Kakori conspiracy, the Chittagong armoury raid, and other actions against the administration in British-occupied India.

The famous Chittagong armoury raid on 18 April 1930 was an attempt at raiding the armoury of police and auxiliary forces, led by freedom fighter Surya Sen. The volunteers he gathered were part of a revolutionary group of nationalists who believed in using force to fight the British. The original plan was to capture two armouries in Chittagong, subsequently destroying the telegraph and telephone office. The group would then take hostages from the European Club, as most of its members were involved in the colonial government in some form. Amongst these volunteers were two incredible women: Pritilata Waddedar and Kalpana Datta. Pritilata had led a team of 40 volunteers in one of the major attacks planned by Surya Sen. Kalpana was given the responsibility of transporting explosives and other supplies, but she particularly excelled in preparing gun cotton, a certain type of explosive agent.

The point to note is that the refugees were citizens of undivided India and they were forced to flee their own homes for saving their lives after being subjected to atrocities on the grounds of religion. They are different from the migrants who left Bangladesh / Pakistan for economic reasons. Every logical mind should therefore welcome the grant of citizenship to all such people, taking into consideration historical reality and the humanitarian aspect.

That is why, on November 25 in 1947, Congress Working Committee had passed a resolution urging citizenship for these refugees. To quote ‘The Congress is bound to afford full protection to all those non-Muslims from Pakistan who have crossed the border and come over to India or may do so to save their life and honour.’

(Ref. India’s struggle for freedom: Select documents and sources by Jagadish Saran Sharma – Vol 3 p 835)

In an article ‘Congress must fulfill its promises made to the Hindu refugees’ by Bishu Duttachoudhury in Barak Bulletin dated December 4, 2018, this and other similar promises made to the refugees from Pakistan by Gandhi, Nehru, Prasad and Patel on different occasions have been elaborately mentioned.

The onus is now on the country to fulfill this promise through the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), which seeks to provide expedited consideration for Indian citizenship to persecuted religious minorities already in India from certain contiguous countries. It seeks to address their current difficulties and meet their basic human rights.

In order to acquire citizenship in India, one needs to go through a naturalization process. One of the criteria of naturalization is that the concerned person has to live in India, or work in the Central Government for 11 years. What this Act does is that it reduces this period to six years for Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan.

The bill got passed in the Parliament. But, the opposition MPs from West Bengal have opposed the bill on the ground that it excludes the Muslims. They know that there cannot be persecution of Muslims in Islamic countries and all Muslim immigrants, mostly illegally, from Bangladesh come to India for economic reasons. Yet they oppose it only for vote bank politics. They don’t mind betraying the Hindu refugees from the partition of India in 1947. Ironically, the Left parties rode to power in West Bengal on the back of the support of the Hindu refugees from East Pakistan.

The writer is a long- standing commentator on contemporary issues.

By opposing C.A.A, Congress is trying to get back its Muslim Vote-bank

0

The Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) passed in both the Houses of Parliament (by Dec 11, 2019) comfortably. It became a law (the President of India ratified) i.e. Citizenship Amendment Act (C.A.A), the very next day. Even if it goes to courts, for a challenge, the cases against it may not stand legally as per former Solicitor General Harish Salve. According to Salve (the most prominent legal luminary) that the Bill doesn’t violate Article 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution of India. All the opposition parties that opposed the Bill in the Rajya Sabha quoted those articles in breach, knowing well that their case is weak.

Arguments like: ‘morality versus majority’ (in passing the CAB) – holier than thou argument – articulated by the Trinmool MP in the opposition camp – does not stick to this government. It’s agreed, in a pluralistic country like India or any other democracy for that matter in the world, with multi – religious or multi-ethnic groups- unanimity is needed rather than a majority in passing a Bill. That never seems to be the case in India. Right from the days of independence, the Congress ruled the country and carved minority vote-bank (specially the Muslim) for itself. Since the regional parties outsmarted the Congress in wooing the very same vote- bank, the Congress is now devoid of its privileged vote-bank. Its heckling on the CAB, signals the party’s eagerness, to get back, what it had foregone to the regional parties i.e. minority Muslim vote-bank. After all, the Congress is a political party. It has every right to do what it wants. But why hiding behind the secular mask and the constitution of India?

Many T.V anchors keep asking, why this CAB (or for that matter abrogation of Article-370 and others initiatives of governance), the government has not discussed with the opposition? Specially, in our country, it is difficult to arrive at a consensus with them. Unanimity is a wild-goose-chase! With what kind of unanimity did the Congress pass the Shah Bano Amendment Bill? With its brute majority the Congress party wanted to pander one community to garner votes. Though passed by a majority in Rajiv Gandhi cabinet, it was never accepted in principle and tolerated by the people of the country. Now, by opposing this CAB, the Congress is trying to consolidate its vote-bank which it has lost in the interim to other secular parties. The Congress always divided the Hindus on caste-basis and consolidated the Muslims to its advantage. Hence, the Congress lost its moral right to ask any query on the CAB.

The principled stand of the BJP: Right from the beginning, the BJP had taken a position different from that of the other parties i.e. to distinguish, who are refugees and who are immigrants, from those coming from neighbouring countries. Whereas, the Congress allowed all kinds of migrants and made them its vote-bank. On the CAB, one of the prominent Congress leaders, while speaking to an English TV channel (to be specific, former finance minister P. Chidambaram to India Today channel) said: ‘Migrations do happen in many countries of the world. People go wherever there are greener pastures. How does a cow that eats grass in Bangladesh know the boundary between that country and India for it to eat grass?’ Such absurd comparisons are not questioned by the secular anchors! As matter of fact, there are countries, there are rules. Humans have to follow those rules. Otherwise, they are dubbed as illegal immigrants. There is a difference between an animal and a human. For, humans’ brain is more evolved, the ex-minister of the Congress should know.

The people from India are not going to the neighbouring Bangladesh or Pakistan, the way those countries’ people are migrating to India. Would they allow Hindus to migrate? Haven’t seen or heard. Why is this, only one-sided immigration? If the Congress party is so sympathetic to migrant Muslims (to get included in the CAB), it’s an anti-national move, by the party. For, years together, since Independence, Hindus in India have been observing family planning to curb population explosion in India. Inclusion of vast Muslim immigrants, as sought by the Congress, would only be a disservice to the cause, Hindus have been standing for, in this country.

The Congress party has no right to quote Mahatma Gandhi or Ambedkar: The Congress party cannot ask for the inclusion of migrant Muslims on the basis of the Constitutional principles and by citing Mahatma Gandhi or Ambedkar. Those two tall leaders, did not envisage what kind of politics the Congress or other secular parties, in competition with the Congress, would play in this country. They did not think that one day the Congress would bring a feeling, among the majority Hindus, they are being alienated in their own homeland. They did not foresee that the Congress divides the Hindu community by castes to their advantage.

After Independence, Gandhi ji himself said: The Indian National Congress (the Congress party in shape and form at that time) i.e.., as a propaganda vehicle and parliamentary machine, had outlived its use. Yet, they clung to the party name, without a change, and mouthing shibboleths to others. Gandhi ji always wanted Swaraj (self-rule). He didn’t want the egregious British Tiger to be replaced by an Indian Tiger after Independence. The Congress (gradually) became an Indian Tiger replacing the British. For its own vote-bank politics, it has not brought the CAB earlier. So, what the Home Minister said in Rajya Sabha: The Congress without waiting for seventy years, should have brought the Citizenship Bill long ago, is apt.

The Congress claim: ‘The idea of India is distorted’, would only bounce back on them. The first family of the Congress, the dynastic successors, are groping for the idea of India, elsewhere in the world, not within the country. One should be, true ‘sons of the soil’ to feel the touch, pulse and emotion. It’s lacking in them. Their much hyped-up broad-mindedness/magnanimity to include migrant Muslims from neighbouring countries, is dubious. No country, is ever willing to take the unskilled labour on a huge scale. Moreover, India is highly populated and it cannot absorb all. The questions like: why not immigrants from the other countries like Sri Lanka, Myanmar and Africa etc. are not included, is ridiculous. They are not Islamic theocratic countries and they have nothing to do with partition of this country. Whereas, persecution of minorities in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan, is a genuine cause for concern.

Going by analysis: The population during the Independence of India was, only 350 million. Now it has reached 1.3 billion. That means, four-fold. In this scenario, how can the country afford to take the neighbouring countries majority Muslim population? Would it not be a threat, if Pakistan, by design, sends some unruly elements? The opposition in their lust for minority votes, never think of security risk. They have a ready remedy, if something disastrous happens i.e. to seek ‘resilience’ from people.

However, the government moved boldly to pass the Bill. Now, it is a done deal. The job left is to assuage the feelings of Assamese and the North-East. Their problem is different from that of the opposition to oppose the Bill. It’s related to the excess migration into their respective states. That could be dealt with by spreading the newly recognized citizens to other regions of the country.

It’s strange to see why Aligarh and Jamia Mellia students are agitating. In what way are they related to Pakistani Muslims? Passing the Bill, is nothing unconstitutional. For, the secular parties viz. JDU, BJD, YSRCP, TDP, AIADMK have also supported the Bill that has become the law now. Don’t they know the Constitutional morality which the opposition Congress is crying hoarse? So, these agitations and rallies have no sense. Hence, conclusively, the BJP led NDA government, in its second term is surging ahead with all big initiatives.

A case study of Jews and Israel: learning lessons for Indians and citizenship amendment bill

0

Note: Wherever I have used the term Hindus and Hinduism, it includes all Dharmic and Indic faiths such as Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, Sikhism. Also, I am in no way suggesting that India should become Israel. A few noteworthy, appreciable aspects of Israel as learning lessons for the Indians are discussed.

Recently, both houses of the Indian parliament passed the Citizenship amendment bill. The bill eases the process of granting citizenship to persecuted religious minorities of three neighbouring Islamic countries: Pakistan, Afganistan and Bangladesh. The bill specifically mentions that persecuted Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs, Zoroastrians and Christians can seek citizenship in India after 6 years of stay in India. This waiting period is shorter compared to the usual waiting period of over 11 years. Muslims are not included in this list. This very reason has been a cause of liberal, leftist, Islamist meltdown in the country. One of the strangest, dangerous and downright disrespectful line of arguments that I heard in this regard was by Magsaysay award winner, Ravish Kumar of the NDTV. In his prime time, he first used the image of Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. He reminded his audiences of how Jews were persecuted and killed in gas chambers. Then he stated a statement made by Supreme Court a few months back that Delhi is becoming like a gas chamber. That statement was made in regards to increasing levels of air pollution in the capital city. He mentions this fact but with clever world play, he suggested indirectly that India is heading towards Nazi Germany and concentration camps and gas chambers or something like that will be used against Muslims. All these because Muslims of these 3 countries were excluded from the CAB. After hearing this, I was pulling my hairs out.

But then, I got an idea from Ravish’s line of arguments. It’s funny Ravish mentioned Jews and the Holocaust. There is actually a lot to learn from the Jewish community, especially for Indians.

A short story of the Jews
Jews are historically a very well-learned and successful community (like Brahmins in India). There had always been an inherent dislike of Jews in significant portions of Christian and Islamic populations over centuries (it is still true especially in case of large % of Islamic population). The term for this hatred: anti-semitism.

After World War I and the loss of Germany, this resentment against Jews grew even further in Germany. The same was exploited by Adolf Hitler. Hitler viewed Jews as lower life forms (like insects, pests). That’s why his followers from the Nazi Socialist Party, his Nazi army generals and even the well-educated Nazi scientists terminated Jews, conducted medical experiments on them and whatnot. The conditions and tortures that Jews faced are unfathomable. To downplay the Holocaust and comparing it to say border detention camps for illegal immigrants (USA-Mexico) or excluding Muslims from CAB is downright disrespectful to the suffered victims and their families.
What happened after World War 2 and the creation of Israel is a big lesson for the Indians. Jews with the help of Allied powers established a very small, yet very significant nation-state of Israel.

Israel’s success story is an example of Jewish excellence, cooperation, brotherhood and handling problems head-on, unapologetically with conviction. Israel is surrounded by its enemies. As mentioned before, a large percentage of the Muslim population around the globe have inherent hatred for Jews and Israel. This is despite the fact that Israel provides equality of opportunities to Muslim population living within its borders. There are Muslim politicians at influential positions in Israel, there are Muslims severing for IDF. However, Israel has special clauses, provisions and arrangements for Jewish communities around the globe.

Any Jew living anywhere in the world, persecuted or not persecuted can seek refuge and ultimately citizenship of Israel. Mossad and other Israel agencies in the past have carried out daring operations rescuing persecuted Jews from enemy countries such as Syria, Iraq. They even facilitated the immigration of African Jews from Sudan. Even a number of Jews from India (who were living peacefully) migrated to Israel. It is worthy to note that Jews acknowledge the fact that India is the only country in the world where they never faced religious persecutions. They even passed a resolution in their parliament in this regard.

Now, Syria is a border state of Israel. Syria has been in a devastating civil war which has created a deep humanitarian and refugee crisis. A huge population of Syrians have migrated to Europe. Taking advantage of this refugee crisis, a large number of illegal immigrants through illegal channels have also migrated to Europe for welfare benefits. This, however, has lead to a crisis and exponential increase in crimes and other law and order situations in such countries. Read “The Strange Death of Europe” by Douglas Murray for more details. Amidst all this crisis, Israel didn’t accept persecuted people in significant numbers from their neighbour Syria.

Now, at first glance, this would seem like a selfish, bigoted policy. But Israelis know what they are doing. Israel has been working on liberalising and progressing Muslim communities (17.8% of the total population of Israel) within their own country and prevent their radicalisation. However, they cannot do so or ensure the same for Muslim communities from other countries. The hatred for Jews amongst the large sections of the Muslim population is a well-known fact. From 9/11 to the death of Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan, they blame all kinds of actions on Jews. Countries like Iran have openly declared that their aim is the annihilation of Israel.

Surrounded by such staunch, radicalised enemies, Israelis have adopted a no-nonsense, nation first, hard-hitting policy. Where they protect the interest of those people who support the nation of Israel at all costs. And at the same time, they retaliate massively to the terrorist outfits, enemy nations, going as far as killing civilian scientists of Iran’s nuclear programs.

Lessons for India
Israel is one of the, if not the most friendly nations of India. Israel has excelled in agricultural, defence, industrial technologies. Tel Aviv is a hub of world-class research, development, and entrepreneurship even rivalling Silicon Valley in some regards. At the same time, it looks for Jewish communities worldwide, even sending Mossad and IDF to rescue a few civilians from enemy nations. It doesn’t hold back in retaliation to its enemies and their politicians, media no matter what the political party, always work for their National Interest (compared that to NDTV, Congress, communists in India). Israel like India faces a lot of criticism in international media mainly because of two reasons.

Firstly, the leftists around the world have sided with radical Islamists and they have indulged in downplaying Islamic terrorism, radicalism (BBC terming Pakistani origin rapists of minor girls as Asians). They also align with the victimhood narrative of Muslims around the world. I actually agree with the fact that Muslims are victims but they are victims in the Islamic nations. They are NOT victims in countries like Israel, USA, India. Indians revere and worship Muslims like Abdul Kalam, Mohammad Rafi, Bismillah Khan. Ajmer Sharif is a holy shrine for Hindus also. However, they are not a fan of Afzal supporters or shameless journalists who downplay atrocities faced by Kashmiri Pandits at the hands of Jihadists in Kashmir.

The second challenge that Israel along with India face in the world of mass media is that many Islamic countries such as Qatar, Saudi are rich and powerful. And Pakistan although not rich is at the mercy of their army generals. So, enemies of Israel, India use this money and their dictatorship to create a paid propaganda warfare against India and Israel. Al Jazeera, NYT, Washington Post are prime examples. ISI had a full-page anti-India advertisement on NYT during this year’s Modi’s visit to the USA. I am sure that there are media outlets and influencers in India that are funded by the enemies of the nation.

Another big challenge that both these countries face is adverse enemy neighbours. Hatred for India and particularly Hindus is real. This is true for large sections of Pakistan and even sections of Bangladesh. Although Afghani civilians are Indophilic, there is Taliban in Afganistan. Hindus have faced unfathomable persecutions in Pakistan and Bangladesh. They are still facing persecutions, forced conversions, abduction-rape-conversion of minor girls. They face economic discrimination also wherein Hindus, Sikhs find it very hard to educate their children properly or conduct business. Hindu population in Pakistan has shrunk from 15% in 1951 to less than 1% today.

Bangladesh had Hindu population in excess of 33% in 1931. They are less than 8% now. Bangladesh Liberation War, post-independent migration, direct action of Kolkata in 1946, Malabar during Khilafat movement, Kashmiri Hindus in 1990, Hindus and Sikhs of PoJK are some of the few examples where Hindus faced large-scale massacres. Now, these are the situations that can be compared to the Holocaust. Nobody can understand the feelings of a Holocaust survivor better than a survivor of the Bangladesh liberation war, Kashmiri Hindus of PoK and Kashmir.

It should be the duty of India that is Bharat to protect and safeguard the human rights of people who believe in the idea of Bharat.

What about the persecuted Muslims of Afganistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh?

All these three countries are Islamic countries. Yes, there are Shias, Ahmediyas, Balochs who are persecuted in Pakistan. However, like Israel’s situation with Syria, one cannot ensure that these people would be easily assimilated and harmonised with India. Sharia can never be implemented and should not even be talked about in India (for obvious reasons).

It is highly likely that large portions of their population like Rohingyas have inherent hatred for Hinduism and Bharat. Anyways, they can still seek refuge through the usual route. Also, there are more than 30-40 Islamic countries in the world. They can easily seek refuge there. There are numerous Christain countries. Even the developed countries like UK, USA, Poland, Denmark, etc. gives preferential treatment to Christians in granting them citizenship. There is not a single Hindu country in the world where Hindus would be given ease of citizenship.

They are as much child of Bharat Mata as we are.

Featured image credits: The Times of Israel
Originally published for my personal blog.

Historical blunder

0

Outset: Read with an open mind, don’t let your ideologies, religion, and political affiliation blind you to the extent that we forget what we are debating for-India’s interest

People ask me why I keep bringing Congress’ 60 years of rule in all my debates and posts. Well, I don’t have the luxury to forget it, and trust me I will not until the wrongs done by them are corrected. The task is daunting, we will face a mountain of hurdles and every step the government takes towards this will be difficult, but we need to understand that sooner or later we have to find permanent solution to the problems itched since Independence. As responsible citizens we have all the right to oppose the current government if we don’t agree to their policies, but the same responsible citizen should take into consideration below facts too while debating.

Article 370:

 Article 370 which provides special status for Jammu and Kashmir is a temporary provision, and we could have very well kept the status intact. But things were  not hunky dory in Kashmir. Every govt in Kashmir has ABUSED 370 to create a roadmap for secession or as they popularly call it “Azaadi” right from Sheikh Abdullah down to the last Mufti govt have constantly been in conflict with the Union of India and often violently so. Far from being run as a peaceful, autonomous state, the Abdullahs and Muftis turned Kashmir into a “Private Kingdom”. The situation got worse after Pakistan suffered a humiliating defeat in the 1971 war. They turned Kashmir into a battleground and plotted war against India through their Kashmir sympathisers and stooges.

Cleansed the Kashmir region of Hindus. Killed them, raped their women and drive them out of Kashmir. Brazen murders of Hindus were committed on the streets. Their properties looted, taken over, their lands gone. The Pakis and their Kashmiri murderers had practically turned Kashmir into an Islamic State. In return, the bootlickers of Congress and other Sickulars fed the anti-nationals and Separatists with tons of money and sympathy. Paki stooges in media, NGOs, Legal fraternity and politics fought the Kashmir-Azaadi battle outside Kashmir.

Today, Kashmiri Muslims are being portrayed as victims, but I feel they are not victims of anything but their own device. The entire Sickular media, and Pakistan feeds them that they are victims. Tell me who asked them to dance for Pakistan? Who asked them to dance for Separatists? Who asked them to constantly riot, throw stones and grenades at Jawans and kill some of them?

JNU

I will not talk about the real truth as I dont want to tar the article by stating my beliefs, but lets say JNU was really established as an institution of learning and research that would achieve better integration with the country’s policies, both national and international. Instead of coming out with a amicable and practical solution for India’s social and cultural problems, all JNU students ever do is fight for Azadi, Bharat ke tukde, I mean even god in its infinite wisdom doesn’t know what Azadi they want.

They have called PM a mass murderer, even though nothing was proved in highest courts of India. Killers like Yakub Memon, Bhat and Afzal Guru were found guilty in acts of terrorism after the most fair and honest judicial trial, but they were hailed as the voice of the oppressed and seen as martyrs killed in the most ruthless manner by India.

The free loaders have various tricks to force the producers into feeding them for free. These include manufactured crimes of the intolerance , cultivation of a sense of entitlement for several reasons (my god told me so, my idol told me so, etc), and if cornered, shout “Oppression”.

Every time something happens that is not in accordance with their ideologies, and interferes there free loading habitat, they heckle and harass  faculty, student, policy, general public, and everyone who opposes them  until they give up. Torching buses, pelting stones, using choicest of abusive words- is this what a student is expected to do?

Babri Verdict

Dr. KK Muhammad reiterated in his book that there was enough evidence of a Ram temple being there over which the Babri mosque was built. Leftist historians and a section of media inflated the Ayodhya issue, ignoring chances of settling the matter in an amicable way. 

The least  Congress government could have done (after knowing the truth) was to have settled the issue and build a Ram temple in 1949 itself when idols of Ram and proof of a temple being there was noticed. Instead, the govt locked up the temple and let the wound fester.

CAB

The Partition of India should have been complete with a full exchange of Hindu-Muslim population. But that didn’t happen.

Again, in 1970s, influx started from Bangladesh- Hindu refugees, because of persecution, and Muslims refugees because of economic opportunities, and other hidden agendas. The Congress, when it returned to power in 2004, wilfully allowed illegals from BD and Pakistan and everywhere to settle in India, they were settled in as far-off places as Jammu, Hyderabad, Jaipur to create a demographic imbalance that would be beneficial to the Sickulars. This swamping of India with Muslims for vote banks is the underlying cause of the “Citizenship Amendment Bill” (CAB).  Not surprisingly, many of these illegals are roaming around with Aadhar cards and Voter cards. Now tell me, who created the problem in the first place?

Above being said, the Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) does not affect Muslims in India in anyway. They remain equal citizens with all others in India. Not just that, it doesn’t even affect the “illegal Muslims” that came into India over many years, because they may have children born in India. Though that does not entitle them to citizenship, it is a burden India has to bear for the crimes of the Congress and other Sickulars like Mamata Banerjee in Bengal.

P.S: While we are fighting for Muslims not being included in the ambit, not once did we talk about the state sponsored  genocide on the Hindus in Pakistan. The logic is not very tough to understand- while Muslims can fight for their rights in Pakistan, Hindus cannot. Pakistan’s constitution has nothing in place for Hindus. Where should they go?

How to get Citizenship, the “Lib-Secular” way

0

The Indian, Lib-Secular is up in arms. Abdul has been denied citizenship by the fascist government of India. The same fascist government, led by a man who was given clean chit for 2002 Godhra riots. They passed The Citizenship Amendment Act: an act providing citizenship to religious minorities persecuted in the three neighboring Muslim-majority countries. But Abdul was not included in it. How dare the Government of India do that!

Naturally, since Indian secularism was designed to protect the rights of only and only their average murderous Abdul, they have decided to uphold the demand for his Citizenship. After all he too is persecuted, running away from his state. For championing this right of Abdul to squat and own any and every piece of land on the planet, the Lib-Sec messiahs are using their time-tested methods –

Of Train Burning and Arson!

The liberal lynch mobs fighting for rights of the average Abdul on the road, running away from a state created for him, are roaring, burning stations and torching trains. They argue that unless every Abdul, who incidentally is part of the peaceful mob doing the torching, is not given citizenship in India, they will keep on torching public property. After all ARSON is the ultimate method of proving that you are a peace-loving citizen, of a peaceful religion, living in a law-abiding nation!

https://sputniknews.com/asia/201912141077575671-cabprotests-dozens-of-vehicles-railway-stations-torched-by-muslim-protesters-in-india—videos/

Of Stone-Pelting!

Whether Abdul is an illiterate of he is studying in Jamia Milia or part of a mob in ISIS controlled Syria, the lure of the stone pelting is so much, that every time Abdul faces a hurdle against his desire to own his neighbor’s land, he picks up the stone. This time the Lib-Secs have told him to pick up stones and pelt at public properties across India, because Indian government told him to go back to his ghetto in Bangladesh. Abdul will protest by stone pelting. How dare the Indian government deny him the right to Indian citizenship! If anyone deserves citizenship of India, it is the Lib-Secs, most beloved stone-pelter, Abdul! And the Indian state is denying that right. Onward with the stone pelting ho!

https://sputniknews.com/asia/201912141077575671-cabprotests-dozens-of-vehicles-railway-stations-torched-by-muslim-protesters-in-india—videos/

Of Vandalism!

Vandalism isn’t vandalism if it’s done at the hands of sharia-abiding Abdul! No matter how many times he decides to indulge in vandalism of public property, the Lib-Secs have realized that vandalism is a crucial weapon through which Abdul, the arsonist, stone peter, exercises his Freedom of Speech and Expression. Heck, such is the loyalty of Lib-Secs to him, that they recognize his right to rape and murder, also as his Freedom of Speech and Expression. A little Freedom of Speech and Expression never harmed anyone. So, what if a few buses got torched. All for Abdul!

https://thelogicalindian.com/news/assam-protests-citizenship-bill/

Of Lynch Mobs!

When a few thousand murderous Abduls are on the roads, chanting slogans and stone pelting, burning, vandalizing, then and only then does their demand for citizenship of India gets properly translated. After all which country on the planet will not give citizenship to a horde of murderous Abduls, running around in Lynch Mobs. Citizenship is something that is given to deserving people, and who can be more deserving than the average Abdul, infiltrating, lynching, pelting and breaking laws with glee! The great Lib-Secs of the great country of India, see an amazing future for the country, in the hands of these Lynch Mobs, a feudal army of thousands of murderous Abduls!

https://www.opindia.com/2019/12/citizenship-amendment-bill-west-bengal-violence-protests/

With such a lot of sophisticated methods of demanding citizenship, the Liberal-Seculars of India hope that Abdul will soon be given citizenship under the CAB. Long live liberalism. Long live secularism!