Home Blog Page 373

अदालत ने AAP सरकार को बोला COVID- 19 रैपिड टेस्ट बढ़ाएं

0

दिल्ली उच्च न्यायालय ने सोमवार को AAP सरकार को राष्ट्रीय राजधानी में कोरोनोवायरस के मामलों में वृद्धि के मद्देनजर COVID परीक्षण पद्धति, रैपिड टेस्ट (RAT) बढ़ाने की कोशिश करने को कहा।

जस्टिस हेमा कोहली की एक पीठ ने सुब्रमणियम प्रसाद ने कहा था कि वर्तमान में आरएटी संख्या प्रति दिन “संक्षिप्त” थी, क्योंकि वे दिल्ली सरकार द्वारा निर्धारित 22,000 परीक्षणों के लक्ष्य के 50 प्रतिशत तक भी नहीं पहुंच रहे थे। रैपिड टेस्ट एंटीजेन टेस्टिंग नंबरों का विस्तार कर सकते हैं। रेट (COVID-19) संख्या को देखते हुए, आप जितनी जल्दी करेंगे, उतना ही बेहतर होगा।”

दिल्ली सरकार के अतिरिक्त स्थायी वकील सत्यकाम ने कहा कि स्वास्थ्य विभाग ने 18 जून को आरएटी पद्धति शुरू की थी और वह अपने परीक्षण चरण में थी। उन्होंने कहा कि परीक्षण पद्धति वर्तमान में गर्म स्थानों और नियंत्रण क्षेत्रों तक ही सीमित थी और अदालत ने एक सप्ताह तक प्रतीक्षा करने के लिए कहा जिसके बाद आरएटी संख्या बढ़ जाएगी।

वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई के दौरान, उच्च न्यायालय ने यह भी सुझाव दिया कि नामित COVID-19 अस्पतालों में RAT कार्यप्रणाली की अनुमति दी जानी चाहिए ताकि परीक्षण संख्याओं में वृद्धि की जा सके। पीठ अधिवक्ता संजीव शर्मा की एक अर्जी पर सुनवाई कर रही थी, जो कई ऐसे उदाहरण पेश कर चुके हैं, जहां सर्जरी से पहले या गैर-सीओवीआईडी ​​रोगियों की जरूरत होती है, जिनके परीक्षण की आवश्यकता होती है, लेकिन इससे पहले परीक्षण की आवश्यकता नहीं होने पर संबंधित अस्पताल परीक्षण करने में असमर्थ है। दिल्ली सरकार द्वारा ऐसा करने के लिए।

इसी मामले में, उच्च न्यायालय ने पहले निजी प्रयोगशालाओं से कहा था कि वे COVID परीक्षणों को करने में उनके सामने आने वाली कठिनाइयों के बारे में सूचित करें। 18 जून को, उच्च न्यायालय के सामने रखी गई प्रयोगशालाओं ने उनके सामने आने वाली विभिन्न कठिनाइयों का सामना किया और इसने दिल्ली आपदा प्रबंधन प्राधिकरण को सलाह देने के लिए उपराज्यपाल द्वारा गठित एक विशेषज्ञ समिति से पूछा था कि उठाए गए मुद्दों की जांच करें और उन्हें हल करें।

सोमवार को दिल्ली सरकार के मुख्य सचिव को प्रयोगशालाओं द्वारा उठाए गए मुद्दों पर चर्चा करने के लिए समिति की एक बैठक बुलाने का निर्देश दिया और निर्देश दिया कि पैनल की सिफारिशों को उच्च न्यायालय में जून की सुनवाई की अगली तारीख से पहले अवगत कराया जाए। लैब द्वारा उजागर की गई कई कठिनाइयों में से एक यह थी कि रोगी पंजीकरण डेटा अपलोड करने की प्रक्रिया बोझिल और समय और जनशक्ति की खपत थी क्योंकि इसे RT-PCR ऐप, COVID ऐप, ICMR पोर्टल और एकीकृत रोग निगरानी पर अपलोड किया जाना था। पोर्टल मुख्यमंत्री के कार्यालय से जुड़ा हुआ है।

प्रयोगशालाओं ने कहा कि यह सब कई डेटा एंट्री ऑपरेटरों को उलझाने की आवश्यकता है, ताकि दैनिक आधार पर कई सरकारी एजेंसियों को जानकारी प्रदान की जा सके, जिससे बहुमूल्य समय बर्बाद हो रहा है और परीक्षण प्रक्रिया से अपनी ऊर्जा को नष्ट कर रहा है। उन्होंने सुझाव दिया कि प्रक्रिया को सरल बनाया जाए और सभी निजी प्रयोगशालाओं के लिए एक एकल बिंदु एजेंसी को नामित किया जाए ताकि अन्य सभी सरकारी एजेंसियों के साथ साझा की जाने वाली आवश्यक जानकारी प्रस्तुत की जा सके।

अन्य कठिनाइयों में शामिल हैं, phlebotomists (जो नमूने एकत्र करते हैं) के पंजीकरण की प्रक्रिया में दोहराव, COVID के लिए परीक्षण के लिए मान्यता प्राप्त प्रयोगशालाओं द्वारा पुन: मान्यता पर NABL का आग्रह, और कोरोनोवायरस के कुछ लक्षणों जैसे गंध और स्वाद के नुकसान का उल्लेख नहीं किया जा रहा है। परीक्षण के लिए या ऐसे रूपों में जो भरे जाने की आवश्यकता है।

शर्मा द्वारा अर्जी अधिवक्ता राकेश मल्होत्रा ​​की मुख्य याचिका में दायर की गई थी, जिन्होंने COVID-19 मामलों का तेजी से परीक्षण करने और 48 घंटों के भीतर परिणाम घोषित करने की मांग की थी। उच्च न्यायालय ने 4 मई को दिल्ली सरकार को निर्देश दिया था कि वे अपनी वेबसाइटों पर प्रकाशित किए गए परीक्षणों के सही आंकड़ों, सकारात्मक परिणामों की संख्या और लंबित परिणामों को प्रकाशित करने के निर्देश के साथ निस्तारण करें।

आवेदन में यह भी आरोप लगाया गया है कि दिल्ली सरकार द्वारा उच्च न्यायालय के 4 मई के निर्देशों का सही तरीके से अनुपालन नहीं किया जा रहा है।

कोरोना वायरस के बारे में अधिक जानकारी के लिए यहां क्लिक करें

The ‘Emergency’ Days

It still haunts me. I can never forget those days. And I’m sure many people, who were young enough to understand and feel the current, will ever forget those ‘Emergency’ days. The dictionary says that, an incident to be an emergency, conforms to one or more of the following: if it poses an immediate threat to life, health, property, or the environment; has already caused loss of life, health detriments, property damage, or environmental damage; has a high probability of escalating to cause immediate danger to life, health, property, or the environment. Since the word ‘emergency’ has different connotations, and does not fit to actually where it was used by the English press in India, we have to take the help of an Indian language. If we take its Hindi equivalent ‘Aapaatkal’ (which was used by the government agencies) it has two different words – ‘aapaat’ means sudden trouble and ‘kaal’ means time. The word ‘aapaat’ is generally used when there is a natural disaster like earthquake, famine and flood etc. We did not see the country facing anything as such. However, though the country was nowhere in trouble, the ruler (read the Prime Minister) was certainly in trouble.  

After the annual vacation, I packed my bags and moved to my hostel room on the 25th June. The very next day June 26, 1975, it was a different world. Though, I was not put behind bars and was free to move anywhere, but how can one, once the country itself was turned into a jail.

Let’s see the chain of events: One year back in 1974, our hero was, contrary to the common belief, not Jayaprakash Narayan, but George Fernandes, the romantic symbol of resistance, under whose leadership Railway workers went on strike all over the country. Though it was crushed without conceding to any of their demands, it was one of the events that led to the Emergency. Our college, which never had a student union, was gearing itself to have one. It was ‘George impact’. That was the name given to our shouting demands for the union election.

On the other hand mass mobilization program of Jayaprakash Narayan was gaining base. None of the political parties had any program that could put fear in the regime. JP’s was a lone voice. We were hearing stories about Bihar and Gujarat where he was most active, though we could not figure out what he was really doing there. Raj Narain, another socialist leader, and proceedings of his election petition challenging Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s election from Rae Bareilly constituency in Uttar Pradesh was everyday in the news. On June 12, 1975, the Allahabad High Court passed a judgment setting aside her election as a Member of Parliament and debarred her from holding any elective office for six years. On June 24th Justice Krishna Iyer, then a vacation judge in the Supreme Court decided on Indira Gandhi’s appeal. He gave a conditional stay allowing her to remain a Member of Parliament, but disallowing her to take part in the proceedings of the Lok Sabha.

Next day, on June 25, 1975 in the evening Jayaprakash Narayan addressed a mammoth crowd in Delhi and called for a Satyagrah from the next day. At midnight the then President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed declared a state of internal emergency in the country on account of a threat to the security of the country due to internal disturbances under the internal Disorder Provision Act. Though emergency was declared thrice before in India due to external aggression in 1962 (Indo-China war), 1965 (Indo-Pak war), and in 1971 (for the same reason), and the last one 1971 war, the emergency was still in force because the then government had virtually forgotten all about it. This time it was different.

I mentioned the name of the then President because he failed to rise to the occasion and meekly acted as a Section Supervisor. “In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article 352 of the Constitution, I, Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, President of India, by this Proclamation declare that a grave emergency exists whereby the security of India is threatened by internal disturbance.” Even this para was drafted in the PMO and historical records show that the President reproduced word for word the draft sent to him by the Prime Minister. The only difference between his letter and hers was the bracket inserted for “clause (1)”.

The announcement was followed with the raids at the houses of prominent and not so prominent leaders. The electricity supply to the newspaper offices had been cut off. Indira Gandhi addressed the nation and referred the situation ‘to incitements to the military and police by certain persons and their proposed program of action to disrupt normal functioning’. After this, even a junior most officer in the bureaucracy became all powerful. Bulldozing of slums, forced sterilization, censorship of the press, false prosecutions under the Defense of India Rules were the business of the day. Indira Gandhi, her son, her henchmen and her numerous chamchas (virtually every Congressman) treated the constitution and the Indian law as their personal property.

My father, a staunch Congress supporter, like other government servants, was asked to give two cases for sterilization. He was unable to get the cases so he was denied his salary. My brother (incidentally a district Youth Congress leader) later forged two certificates and my father got his salary after about five months. I can never forget those five months. It was very embarrassing to face hostel warden with my unpaid dues. I was desperately missing those sixty rupees (which also included my college and hostel fees), which was a big amount those days, enabling one to see a Dev Anand movie paying just ninety paisa for a front row seat. But I was not alone. There were 640 million Indians like me.

One day we were shocked to see billboards and buses painted with a message by Acharya Vinoba Bhave, who hailed the Emergency as a festival of discipline (Aapatkal Ek Anushashan Parva Hai). He was not alone. M.F. Hussain painted Indira Gandhi as Durga. There were many other artists, writers and journalists eulogizing the government in their own way. We couldn’t believe these people were unaware of Turkman Gate tragedy, detention of roughly 36,039 men under the MISA, maltreatment of and atrocities on detainees and other prisoners under DIR/MISA and use of force in the implementation of the family planning program. They were instrumental in spreading ‘good stories’. The intellectual community in India died in 1975, only to reborn later with two strictly opposing ideologies. The world is still witnessing the vacuum and the verdict is confirmed – India can never dream of having an intellectual revolution. There will be absolutely no uprising for whatsoever. A big statement, but that’s the truth. 

Newspapers carried stories and columns full of good news: “Emergency instilled discipline; inflation rate going down; trains running on time; down the crime rate; and tax collection going up.”  Indira Gandhi had announced a 20 point economic program, and Sanjay Gandhi too had his five point program. Leaders like Vidya Charan Shukla, Narain Dutt Tiwari, Bansi Lal and others were busy in implementing these programs, lovingly caressing in one hand, Sanjay Gandhi’s shoes or chappals or sandals whatever they could find. I remember we students were asked to stand in a row on both sides of the road to wave Sanjay Gandhi who was supposed to cross the road to attend a public rally. He turned up two hours late. In between ND Tiwari, then UP CM, had rehearsals three times.

It was a traumatic time, dark and uncertain; still there were some very charismatic personalities like JP, Nanaji Deshmukh, George Fernandes, and Subramanian Swamy who swept the imagination of my generation. Swamy did a daring act of entering the Parliament at the peak of Emergency. Indian media were too timid to report the act in detail, but the BBC reported it as all the major newspapers and radio stations across the world. Just think of it when the whole country was under surveillance and hardly a few leaders like Nanaji Deshmukh underground, a man, after leading a big march in London protesting against the conditions in India, with the Indian High Commissioner in Britain, BK Nehru reporting back to Indira Gandhi his every move, suddenly appears in Rajya Sabha. A stunned Rajya Sabha chairman, Vice President, BD Jatti and Minister of State for Home Om Mehta could not even think what they should do. And our man left the House announcing clearly that he was staging a walkout because the chairman did not include democracy (yes, you’re reading it right, the democracy) while reading out the list of obituaries – a customary practice when Parliament opens. Dear readers, if you have not lived the Emergency days, you will not get to the depth of this sentence. And saying this our man came out coolly from the House with the same calm and courage and left India via Nepal to USA.     

I consider myself lucky that I got to know George Fernandes from very close quarters and found opportunity to interact with him on many topics. A real man of principle and most considerate, obliging, helpful and solicitous person, a loving soul. It was sheer pleasure to be with him in his Krishna Menon Marg bungalow in the morning hours and occasionally have sattu with water, all along discussing the strength of the Chinese army. I found him well-read, a fact not widely known. One thing was certain that no one could fool George. He knew almost all the happenings around the world. Whenever I prodded, he was always forthcoming and spoke a lot, but about that in another piece, I will write.

After 21 months it was Vice-president BD Jatti, who was appointed acting President after Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed’s death a month earlier, signed the withdrawal of Emergency and issued a declaration: “In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (a) of clause (2) of Article 352 of the Constitution, I, Basappa Danappa Jatti, Vice-President acting as President of India, hereby revoke the Proclamation of Emergency issued under clause (1) of that article on the 25th June, 1975, and published the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Home Affairs No. GSR 353(E) dated the 26th June, 1975.” This declaration reached the Home Ministry at 4 am. According to a note the emergency was lifted in the early hours of March 21, 1977. Almost immediately, the withdrawal of several draconian laws began along with the easing of restrictions, the release of political prisoners, etc. And the country felt a sigh of relief.

Indira Gandhi announced the general election and suffered the most humiliating defeat. Janata Party came to power. There was a commission of inquiry headed by a former chief justice of the Supreme Court Justice J.C. Shah which probed the excesses of Emergency. Justice Shah submitted three reports (three volumes running into over 500 pages), held 81 open hearings spread over seven months. The findings were startling. The excesses were studied in details and the culprits singled out. But nothing happened and Justice Shah’s commission of inquiry died a silent death. Not only that, the members of the commission were harassed when Indira Gandhi returned as Prime Minister. The report lays bare the massive use of official machinery to hold rallies in her favor and to agitate against Justice Jagmohan Lal Sinha of the Allahabad high court, who “could not be tempted and (who) would not submit to pressure”, to delay the judgment. The report describes the ‘damage done to the civil service and the extra-legal procedures that were used – illegal orders given orally by men in the PMO who had no locus standing in official business in the first place’.

Today it’s really hard to believe that some of the people who were responsible for the atrocities and who were indicted by the commission again came to power in another garb. Vidya Charan Shukla the most infamous among the trio (with Sanjay Gandhi and Bansi Lal) became minister in successive governments, Bansi Lal became Chief Minister of Haryana, Jag Mohan was later considered a crusader, Vajpayee government could not find a substitute to K.C. Pant, and Maneka Gandhi…. The list is very long. Even Charan Singh and my generation’s another hero Chandrasekhar became Prime Ministers with the help of the same party. They had, with their actions, made Emergency just part of a seminar menu. But neither any political leader nor any member of the bureaucracy has expressed regret. As the history books come to a stop in 1947, younger generation knows nothing about Emergency.

There were only newspapers and journals, no social media. A lot of stories were floating, stories that mesmerized us.

One I still remember – “When George Fernandes was brought in the court, he raised his chained hands before the judge saying “Sir, these chains are symbols of the entire nation which has been chained and fettered. I am proud that when Mrs Gandhi became the dictator, I and my comrades behaved like men.” A strong slap indeed to the spineless Congressmen, supporting opposition leaders, mediamen who as LK Advani remarked, ‘when asked to bend, crawled’, and famed intellectuals and opinion makers. Except Indian Express group, Statesman, and to some extent The Hindu, others were shocking their readers day in and day out with the kind of stories they published. I’m sure it’s hard to believe that even after the Emergency was lifted not many newspapers and magazines came out with real stories. The owners were still afraid of Mrs Gandhi, and their apprehensions were proved real when she returned to power barely after 33 months.

But there were quite a few publications, mostly in Malyalam and Hindi; those came out with special numbers, but the English press completely ignored this immediate important period of history. I remember the cover of one special issue – a handcuffed George Fernandes standing behind bars – it was RSS supported journal ‘Rashtradharm’ published from Lucknow in Hindi. It was sold like hot cake. 

There were many stories to be told. One of the most horrific I’ll narrate here: P. Rajan, a student of the Regional Engineering College, Calicut, was arrested by the Kerala police on March 1, 1976, for the alleged Naxal association. He died as a result of torture in police custody and the body was never recovered. Rajan’s father T.V. Eachara Warrier, a professor of Hindi, fought a long battle against the establishment to bring to light the facts behind the disappearance and through that exposed atrocities committed by the state. Rajan’s father’s representations to the authorities produced no result. He met the then Home Minister of the State K. Karunakaran, wrote letters to the President, Prime Minister, and the Home Minister to the Government of India with copies to all the Members of Parliament. The police finally confirmed that Rajan died in custody upon a habeas corpus suit filed by his father in the High Court. The Home Minister K. Karunakaran addressed several public meetings and made mention of the fact that Rajan was involved as an accused in a murder case, but the truth is Rajan was never produced before a Magistrate.

My dear readers, I’m going to give you the most shocking information about the way Indian police, in fact, functions. Rajan’s crime was his name. The Naxalites had attacked a police station, and when the police couldn’t find one Rajan involved in the crime, the then chief of the Crime Branch wing of Kerala Police, DIG Jayaram Padikkal, ordered every Rajan in the area to be picked up. Our Rajan, who had just returned after a youth festival, and couldn’t have participated in the police attack unless he had mastered multilocation presence, was swept up in this ‘Rajan’ sweep.

The chief minister at the time, C Achutha Menon was personally known to Prof Eachara Warrier, who himself was sympathetic to the Communist Party and had hid Menon from police before independence. Menon did nothing and apparently mocked Eachara Warrier when he approached for help. It was widely believed that Menon was mortally afraid of Karunakaran and his goon squad as Karunakaran was very close to Indira Gandhi. Prof. Eechara Warrier’s long fight against the Establishment, which would never reveal the truth about his son’s disappearance, symbolizes all fights for justice that had taken place after independence.

The 1988 Malayalam film Piravi (The Birth) directed by Shaji N. Karun has its plotline adopted from this incident. Every time I watch Piravi tears roll down my cheeks. It stars Premji, Archanaand and Lakshmi Krishnamurthy. Piravi met with widespread critical acclaim upon release and very well received at many film festivals across the world, winning at least 31 awards in total, including the Camera d’Or –Mention Speciale at the 1989 Cannes Film Festival. It also won the National Film Award for Best Feature Film at the National Film awards in 1989. In 1977, the All Kerala Rajan memorial music competition was started at the REC Calicut to commemorate Rajan’s life.

Surprisingly, during the Emergency, the Hindi film industry kept quiet as usual, although Gulzar’s soft-mature love story ‘Aandhi’ is credited to be a movie that captures the period which is a blatant lie. It has nothing to do with Emergency. It has been just sheer coincidence that the movie was released in February, 1975 and was banned a few weeks after its release. Later, when a new government cleared the movie, it instantly became a hit. Industry was not at fault as its then poster boy Amitabh Bachchan was very close to the Indira Gandhi family.

With Sanjay Gandhi’s death in a plane crash in July 1980, one of the most controversial stars of this sordid drama ceased to exist. Later Indira Gandhi’s assassination in 1984 transformed the lingering shadow of dictatorship into a halo of self-sacrifice and with Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination the purification process was completed. These convenient deaths and brutal assassinations ultimately, helped to push the Emergency narratives out of focus.

But how people of my generation can forget those “Emergency” days?

(This column simultaneously appeared in India’s best known business magazine “Indian Economy & Market”)

By Krishna Kumar Mishra 

The communal history of Mau-like Godhra, Mau is a place known for Muslim fanaticism

On 23 May 2020, OpIndia reported that “A complaint has been filed against 19 members of the Muslim community kept in quarantine in Uttar Pradesh’s Mau for threatening ASHA workers with death after the latter advised them to follow quarantine norms.”

While some Muslim youth were supposed to remain inside a quarantine centre for 14 days, many of them flouted the quarantine restrictions and were seen outside the facility playing cricket. When the ASHA workers in the area tried to convince the youths to remain inside the quarantine facility lest they possibly infect others, the quarantined members of the Muslim community started dishing out threats to the ASHA workers. ASHA worker Sharda Devi filed a complaint in this regard after which CHC Superintendent Dr AP Singh filed a complaint against 19 quarantined members at the Muhammadabad police station.

This is nothing surprising. Godhra (its twin city of Dahod is the birth place of the fanatical Mughal emperor Aurangazeb) town in Gujarat is a place known for fanaticism of Muslims since 1927 at least. Even Mahatma Gandhi had written on Muslim communalism in Godhra in Young India dated 11 October 1928, recorded in his Collected Works, Volume 43, pages 81-82. Mau in Uttar Pradesh similarly saw major communal violence at least twice in the 21st century (assuming the year 2000 is considered as a part of the 21st, not the 20th century) itself. According to an extremely biased report by die-hard Leftists and Islamists (Vibhuti Narain Rai, Rooprekha Verma, Nasiruddin Haider Khan) which was published by Teesta Setalvad’s Sabrang, ‘Mau saw riots in 1969, 1983, 1984, 1988, 1990 and 2000, and in 1984 during riots even an officer of district administration had lost his life.’

7 October 2000 was the first occasion in the 21st century, when a BJP-led coalition Government (BJP was not having a full majority, needed support of other NDA allies) was ruling Uttar Pradesh, with Ramprakash Gupta as Chief Minister (Rajnath Singh became Chief Minister a few days later on 28 October 2000). The Times of India reported on 19 October 2005, in an article written by a Muslim Pervez Iqbal Siddique, that:

“This is not for the first time that communal flare-up spelt doom for the peace loving population of Mau…In the year 2000, there was a similar outbreak of violence…In 2000, it was around the same time-October 7-that violence broke out in Mau. A stray incident of stone throwing on a procession of Durga Puja passing through predominantly Muslim areas of Mirza Hajipur and Katra, sparked the trouble. One person was stabbed to death and dozens of others were injured. Property worth thousands was gutted following incidents of arson and curfew had to be imposed to control the situation….(The then UP State Parliamentary Affairs Minister Hukum) Singh informed the (UP) House that two persons had been arrested and that the police were looking for the man responsible for throwing stones at the Durga idols procession…He is untraceable till date (19 October 2005).”

Thus, under a BJP-led Government too Muslims of Mau attacked a Durga Puja procession. The Muslim fanaticism in the Mau riots of October 2005 was not highlighted by the media much, though the inactive role of the UP Government for the first few days was. In 2005, Mulayam Singh Yadav was the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, and the UPA Government was ruling at the Centre (which had Muslim League as an ally with a place in the Union Ministry, and TMMK as a state-level ally in Tamil Nadu). Weekly Organiser gave two reports on the riots of 2005. The first, by Sandhya Jain in Organiser dated 30 October 2005 said:

Mau: Riot of Muslim intolerance,
By Sandhya Jain

The unexpected outbreak of organised communal rioting in the Mau district of Uttar Pradesh, leaving 12 dead [final figure was 20 dead] and several dozens injured in over four days of uncontrolled violence, despite the organisers of the Bharat Milap procession cancelling the October 13 show in the interest of social harmony, indicates a cultural intolerance that does not bode well for India. Political parties would do well to consider if this is part of a concerted strategy to enhance the growth of minority conclaves in India by driving out native populations through the systematic use of terror, a weapon used in Assam, Kashmir and other States…

So slow was the UP government to respond to the riots that dozens of residents fled to adjoining districts of Ghazipur, Gorakhpur and Azamgarh in apprehension of fresh violence. Hundreds are seeking security in numbers by clustering together in makeshift shelters in fields and near railway lines, preferring the open spaces to their homes in the old congested bylanes of the town.

It is said that violence began when Muslims observing Roza protested at loudspeakers playing Hindu devotional songs on the occasion of Bharat Milap. This cultural intolerance that is regularly displayed on the occasion of Hindu festivals, even as Muslims spill over on to public roads and footpaths for the Friday namaaz, needs to be confronted…Clearly the Muslims of Mau wanted, through a display of extreme bigotry, to force Hindus to not celebrate auspicious dharmic functions and surrender their community identity for the sake of a false communal harmony….

… The courts must also consider, when riot-related cases come before them, why a local Muslim MLA was allowed to prevent police action against rioters for four whole days, before media coverage compelled action.

Shops and establishments were looted with impunity, and a Dalit colony attacked in the early hours of the morning and jhuggies set on fire, which clearly indicates premeditated action on the part of the assailant group. A temple was set on fire in the Kamaria locality, and we need to have a public debate on whether modern India is willing to countenance once again the medieval-style iconoclasm and vandalism of its holy places.

Residents fled to adjoining districts of Ghazipur, Gorakhpur and Azamgarh in apprehension of fresh violence.

Local independent MLA Mukhtar Ansari, who was finally booked for inciting the riots, shamelessly blamed the Hindu Mahasabha for tension in the city, even though police officials told the media that it was he who prevented them from taking firm action to bring the riots under control in a timely manner. Ansari, who has 36 criminal cases and a TADA conviction against him, moved about the city in an open Gypsy van, accompanied by armed henchmen, despite curfew and shoot-at-sight orders. Naturally, the mobs owing allegiance to him had a field day…”

In the next issue of Organiser dated 6 November 2005, Pramod Kumar gave a detailed report from the place itself. That report said:

Special Investigation
Mau burnt as Mulayam fiddled

Unprovoked, organised Muslim vandalism against numerically weak Hindus
By Pramod Kumar from Mau

‘It deeply hurt me when I saw my neighbour, Shuakat Ali, in the mob attacking my house. We had family relations with Shaukat and during the last more than two decades we shared all happiness and sorrow as good neighbours and true friends. His children always played with my children at our house, studied in the same school and even go for tuition to the same tutor. But, in a matter of seconds, he forgot the two-decade-old relationship and did not hesitate to ruin my family and that too without any reason. Though, I suffered a loss of lakhs of rupees in this attack, I fortunately managed to save my children’, thus narrated Shrikant Goswami of Rauza Mohalla in Mau his experience on that fateful day, tears rolling down his cheeks. After a brief silence, he further added, ‘After this incident I fear for my children. They will no longer be able to live in Mau, if such a state of affairs continues.’

This is the story of most of the Hindus in Mau, which has still been burning in the fire of riots since October 13. Hindus are so scared in this city, which was previously known as Maunath Bhanjan, that they cannot even think of retaliation. Reason, the acute demographic imbalance. In old Mau city, where the riots broke out, Muslims constitute over 90 per cent of the population and Hindus are hardly 10 per cent and that too scattered. Over all in the Mau district, Muslims claim 60 per cent and Hindus 40 per cent of the population. In this riot, the 99 per cent of the victims are Hindus. If any Muslim suffered, it was due to the action of security forces against the rioters. The administration claims 14 people are dead…

However, the actual number of the dead and loss of property will be confirmed only after the curfew is lifted. Officials also admit that they have received various innumerable complains of missing people.

People of the region are scared. It took me over 24 hours to reach Mau from Varanasi as all trains and road transport were banned and no private vehicle owner was ready to go there at any cost. I somehow managed to reach there via Ghazipur at 7.15 am on October 25. When I reached the curfew-bound areas along with a local journalist, the people candidly said, ‘Sir, it was a direct action against Hindus. The rioters burnt the shops and attacked the houses of Hindus alone. At certain points the rioters fired with AK 47 rifles.’ When usually a mob sets shops on fire, it does not discriminate. But in Mau, the shops were carefully selected before setting them on fire. There is a Sindhi colony which the rioters have completely destroyed and the Sindhis had to seek shelter at Madhav Hotel, near the railway station. ‘We have been totally ruined. All our businesses have been gutted. We could not even save the dignity of our women,’ said a Sindhi victim, but refused to disclose his name fearing more attacks from the rioters.

Construction of a mosque at the ground, where the function of Bharat Milap is held every year during Ramlila, is said to be the root cause of permanent tension in the city. There was a major riot in 1984, which claimed heavy causalities. Again, in 1994 the riots erupted with less causalities. After long deliberations, the Allahabad High Court had ruled that the local administration will take over the mosque/madrasa 12 hours before the Bharat Milap function, which is a major cultural event every year. After the overnight cultural activities, the main function of Bharat-Milap is held early in the morning. It is with a consensus between both the communities that the platform of the Bharat Milap is erected near the gate of the mosque. In turn the Muslims are allowed to rest their tazia on the stairs of the Sanskrit Pathshala, about 100 metres from the Shahi mosque, during Moharram every year.

‘What went wrong this year is that the local police did not take over the mosque/madrasa before the stipulated time and even before the function of Bharat Milap could begin some talibs from madrasa broke the wire of the loudspeaker. After some time the riots broke out and the function had to be postponed till October 29. If the function had not been postponed at that time, there could have been more causality among the Hindus as the rioters were armed with sophisticated weapons. When the workers of the Ramlila committee that organises the function, protested against the mischief of the Muslims, they became violent,’ said Prof. Ramji Singh, BJP MLC, while talking to Organiser.

The violence continued for three days without any action from the local administration. The rioters were killing innocent Hindus and burning their property in the old city, the heavy police forces were conducting flag-march on the Highway, outside the city. People believe that it was deliberately done to prevent the Hindus from the adjoining villages to come for rescue,’ said Shri B.N. Singh, senior advocate of Mau.

On October 14, the rioters crossed all limits when a mob of over 1,000 miscreants attacked the Mau railway station. They attacked the innocent passengers of Balia-Shahganj passenger train in which over 36 passengers were seriously injured. When the rioters tried to burn the train, the Railway Police Force (RPF) resorted to firing in which a Muslim rioter, Mehatab, was killed. It was only after the firing that the rioters started running away. People say another Godhra-like incident was averted on that day.

Certain incidents indicate that the riots were pre-planned and the administration was aware of the planning. On October 3, some Muslim goons destroyed the idols at Dhekulia Ghat temple where Hindus go for pitruvisarjan on the last day of Pitrapaksh. When the Hindus protested, the administration gave them an assurance that the culprits would be nabbed within two or three days. But nothing of the sort happened so far. Again on October 9, a Muslim mob attacked the Durgapooja pandal in Sadar Chauk, where even the additional SP was injured. Despite that the police and administration remained silent. Even after so much tension, the police did not take over the Shahi mosque/madrasa on October 13 as is customarily done before the Bharat-Milap function.

I visited the entire curfew-bound area. People said outsiders were also included in the mob of rioters. It is alleged that they were all Mukhtar Ansari’s men. People wanted to send their children and women to safer places as there had been repeated attacks by Muslims even under the curfew. They seemed least surprised at the continued attack by miscreants even during the curfew, as they knew of the silent support of the State government. The local administration is under the control of none other than the dreaded criminal and independent MLA, Mukhtar Ansari… Here it is worth mentioning that Ansari has also been misusing the Mau Rest House as his personal office ever since he became an MLA. His elder brother, Afzal Ansari is the Samajwadi Party MP from Ghazipur, 35 km from Mau…
The question that haunts everybody is that who provided the AK-47s and other sophisticated arms to the rioters. The Mau riots appear just a beginning of a larger disaster…


Conspiracy to finish Hindus from eastern region
-Prof. Ramji Singh

Prof. Ramji Singh, BJP MLC, while terming the Mau riots as a massacre of Hindus, said the local MLA, Mukhtar Ansari wanted to finish Hindus from the whole eastern region…Terming the enquiry committee, constituted under Smt. Neera Yadav, as ‘meaningless’, he demanded immediate release of those innocent Hindus who were arrested to appease Muslims during the riots….

Preplanned conspiracy of Samajwadi Party
Sudha Rai, President, State Mahila Congress

Smt. Sudha Rai, wife of former Union Minister, Kalpnath Rai, said the Mau riots were a preplanned conspiracy of local Samajwadi Party leaders who did it for grabbing Muslim votes in the coming municipality elections in Mau. ‘Even after four days of the riots the local administration and the government were missing. The local SP leaders are providing patronage to the rioters. The statement of Mukhtar Ansari after his so-called surrender in Ghazipur on October 25, that he can go to jail many times for Mulayam Singhji, must be taken seriously,’ she said while talking to Organiser in a telephonic interview. ‘It shows the failure of the State government and the local administration as the rioters ruined the city and killed dozens of innocent people. The city continued to burn but the officials failed to do anything,’ she said…”

Let see a report by a CPM team here. A CPI(M) delegation consisting of Premnath Rai (State Sect. Member), Ram Kripal (MLA) and Subhashini Ali visited Mau on the 30th October 2005 when curfew was lifted in the entire town for the first time. The report said:

“…On the 14th (October 2005) morning at about 8.00 a.m., however, the local unit of the Hindu Yuva Vahini sat on dharna in front of the adjacent police chowki, protesting against interference in their religious observances. The local police did precisely nothing and soon large crowds collected and verbal altercations were followed by stone-throwing. And then Ajit Singh Chandel of the HYV allegedly starting firing injuring 3-4 Muslim youths. This news spread like wildfire and in the nearby Rauza and Sindhi Colony area, shops and buildings belonging to Hindus were set on fire. A large printing press, several cloth shops etc were burnt. The policemen standing here ran away. The administration remained paralysed for several hours before curfew was finally imposed but by then there had been several incidents of arson and looting.

Soon after the imposition of curfew, Mukhtar Ansari made a public appearance in Mau aboard an open jeep. It has been reported that the local administration requested him to come to help them restore peace. In any case, his moving around openly after curfew had been imposed was an extremely provocative and unjustifiable act and, if the administration had in fact asked him to come, this only proves their total incompetence and criminal ineptness. The road turning off the Highway has many small shops and tenements inhabited by Yadavs.

We visited this area and met many people here. Ashok Gupta’s house is in front of the Simla unit and, in fact, he and his family helped the Simla family rescue their workers and salvage some of their belongings and then, they themselves, had to face arson and loot. Many of the poor Yadav families also met us. All their shops and tenements had been completely destroyed and everything they possessed had been burnt to ashes. They claimed that the crowd that was watching the Simla unit being torched was greatly provoked by Mukhtar Ansari’s arrival here and they followed his vehicle and were then responsible for the losses they suffered. In the middle of this road is the neem tree under which one Ram Pratap Yadav – a poor man who had come from his village a kilometer away to Mau for some work and to make some purchases – was shot dead. The people we talked to said that at the time that he was killed, they were running away for their lives or trying to save their families or some of their possessions and so they did not see who shot him but that the shot was fired by someone around the MLA. When we asked them if any of the Simla family were there at that time they said that did not see any of them and in any case they were busy saving themselves at the time.

In the afternoon of the same day (14 October), there was a mob attack on the railway station where a train was waiting and it was only because the few GRP personnel present reacted and fired into the mob that a major calamity was averted. (Accepts that another Godhra would have happened, had it not been for police firing.) There are two mosques near the station and one of them has suffered some damage and 2 people were killed in this incident. After this, all trains running to and from Mau were stopped for two weeks….”

Though this report is extremely biased, it is by the biggest political and ideological enemy of the BJP, namely the CPI(M), it needlessly brings in Hindu Yuva Vahini somehow, it does report the attacks on killings of Hindus in Mau, and their shops and buildings being set on fire by Muslims. It accepts that there could have been another Godhra had it not been for firing on a Muslim crowd attacking a railway station.

The above facts of Mau must never be allowed to be forgotten. It was of course, a travesty of justice that not a single person was convicted by the trial court, and all 32 accused, including MLA Mukhtar Ansari were acquitted on 15 September 2006. A total of 20 were killed in these Mau riots, according to that PTI report.

A pregnant woman was given death penalty by court in Sudan- for leaving Islam #ExMuslimLivesMatter

In India, there is a question of Safoora Zargar, who allegedly instigated riots in Delhi in February 2020, being denied bail and kept in jail despite being pregnant. There are laws which specify what needs to be done in such cases, and her being denied bail is perfectly legal. Besides, her dangerous statements are on record. One can see just a sample of what she said here.

Despite this, the Left-liberals and camouflaged Islamic radicals like Arfa Sherwani, and others claimed that ‘injustice’ was done to her, and that she should have been released from jail just because she is pregnant. In this context, we must tell the world what Islamists did and continue to do to former Muslims, those who leave Islam.

In May 2014 in Sudan, a heavily pregnant woman was given death penalty for converting to Christianity from Islam, marrying a Christian man. Her only ‘crime’ was leaving Islam. A BBC report said on this incident:

“A court ruling in Sudan sentencing a heavily pregnant woman to death has reignited debate about punishment for apostasy.

Dr Meriam Yahya Ibrahim was condemned to hang for allegedly leaving Islam and marrying a Christian man.

The court said that by doing so, she had abandoned her religious faith and was guilty of apostasy, which carries the ultimate penalty under Islamic law in the country…

…Other more conservative Muslims refer to the words of the Prophet Muhammad in the Hadith saying: “It is not permissible to spill the blood of a Muslim except in three [instances]: A life for a life; a married person who commits adultery; and one who forsakes his religion and separates from the community.”…

The late Ayatollah Khomeini, Iran’s religious and political leader, famously denounced the author Salman Rushdie as an apostate for his novel The Satanic Verses – and said he should be killed.

Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Afghanistan also uphold strict interpretations.

…In 2006, an Afghan, Abdul Rahman, who announced his conversion to Christianity escaped a death sentence and was offered asylum in Italy.

Another Afghan citizen was granted asylum in the UK earlier this year after persuading the courts he faced the death penalty at home because he was an atheist.

Meanwhile, non-Muslims such as the Bahai community have faced difficulties in countries including Egypt…

…When she was convicted on Sunday, Dr Ibrahim – who is said to be eight months pregnant – was given three days by the court to return to Islam. But she again affirmed her Christian faith, and her lawyer says she will appeal against the sentence…”

Recently there were trends on Twitter saying #BlackLivesMatter, #WhiteLivesMatter #HinduLivesMatter #MuslimLivesMatter #AllLivesMatter What needs to be trended is #ExMuslimLivesMatter since ex-Muslims are to be given death penalty in Islamic and Shariah Law, anywhere in the world. Everywhere a former Muslim is under threat, USA, Europe, Canada, Australia, or anywhere. Death penalty to anyone leaving Islam is the law today in 8 nations in the world, Afghanistan, Brunei, Mauritania, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, the United Arab Emirates, and Yemen. Most, or all other Islamic nations have laws against apostasy, giving various punishments.

A known Indian ‘secularist’ and apologist of Islamists, Swaminathan Aiyar wrote against this on 2 April 2006 when he came to know of this law, giving death to apostates in Afghanistan, in a country supposedly rescued by liberals from the fanatical Taliban. He wrote in an article titled “The sad silence over Abdul Rehman”:

…I am aghast at the virtual silence in India over the proposed execution of Abdul Rahman of Afghanistan for what his country’s legal system regards as the capital offence of having converted to Christianity. But I hear no outcry from moderate Muslims, or Hindu intellectuals who normally wave the secular flag. None of the major secular parties seems interested in deploring the horror. They would rather bury their heads in the sand and emerge only whenHindu communalism is the issue.

I always knew that Afghanistan’s new Constitution made it an Islamic state. But I had no idea that its laws called for the execution of any Muslim who converts to another religion. Needless to say, the law happily permits Christians or Hindus to convert to Islam.

This is not a case of some Islamic extremist saying crazy things. This is not a law in some state ruled by mad mullahs. It is the law in a country supposedly rescued by liberals from the religious extremism of the Taliban. It is the law in a country that India hails as secular, and as an old friend.

For that reason, intellectuals and political parties that never hesitated to condemn the excesses of the Taliban are silent today. To me, this reeks of hypocrisy.

…An alert prosecutor promptly charged Rahman with apostasy, punishable by death.

The prosecution had widespread public support. Rahman had to be kept in a high-security cell for fear that other prison inmates would kill him. Apparently his “crime” was enough to enrage even hardened criminals.

Most people would have quickly repudiated their conversion to escape death. But Rahman refused to budge. Go ahead and kill me, he said, but I will remain true to my faith…

…I say that a person willing to die for his religious beliefs, without threatening violence or retribution, is a hero.

My fellow secularists will argue: why raise a fuss about Abdul Rahman? He is going to be sent out of Afghanistan, and will not die. Indeed, sundry Christian associations will hail and support him wherever he goes.

To me, this is moral cowardice parading as pragmatism. Religious bigotry, whether of the Hindu or Islamic variety, is a curse, an evil. If it is not attacked wherever it exists, it will spread.

…A milder but still disturbing form of international communalism is the lack of protests in Muslim countries over Abdul Rahman’s prosecution. It bodes ill for the future.

We need to fight all religious bigotry—Muslim, Hindu or Christian. We must not gloss over the shocking Afghan law placing religious converts on par with murderers, worthy of execution. I use the word we, yet I do not how many people are with me on this issue. I hear mainly silence from Islamic countries. I hear mainly silence from supposed secularists in India. Hardly anybody wants to rock the boat for something as minor as principle.

All my life, I have sought a brotherhood of man. But if some fellow humans say I can be killed for my beliefs, will they ever be my brothers? Is there any future for this vision of brotherhood?”

   Swaminathan Aiyar was shocked to know the Afghanistan law giving death to apostates. He would be more shocked to know that not just Afghanistan, but a total of 8 Islamic countries have this law giving death (and almost all other Muslim countries have laws giving various other punishments), which is in Islamic law & majority of Muslims support it.

Swaminathan Aiyar expected ‘protests’ in the Muslim world over this Afghanistan law giving death to apostates! This is because he was unaware of the theology of radical Islamists. Had he read it, he would have realized the dangers to human freedom from it, realized that the Hindu nationalists in India, who he castigated for a lifetime, are right, and that the truth is far more dangerous than what the Hindu nationalists dare to say in India.

In an Islamic Questions and Answers website, the person who answered a question on apostasy openly justified the death penalty to apostates, to anyone leaving Islam-whether born Muslim or convert.

This website said this while replying to a question by a non-Muslim asking about death to apostates in Islam! One would have thought it would misinterpret and say that it is not so, and that only God will decide after this life what to do to anyone who leaves Islam. But no, it was very honest and clear- death to any apostate.

Have you seen any ‘moderate’ Muslim condemn this? Arfa Khanum, Zainab Sikander and other camouflaged Islamic radicals have never condemned the death penalty to apostates and demanded that every Muslim should have full freedom to leave Islam. Let us dare Arfa Sherwani, Zainab Sikander and others to condemn the apostasy law in Islam.

This is how they behave in this age of Internet, when they are in a minority in the world, openly justifying death penalty to apostates while talking to non-Muslims!

Daredevil of Indian Army: Para SF Major Mohit Sharma’s who became Iftikaar Bhatt to kill terrorists

0

William Shakespeare once said that “it’s not the stars to hold our destiny but in ourselves”. And that was the possible reason behind an underweight and skinny boy who was at his teenage at that time, later going to be known as one of the badass Special Forces operative in Indian Army’s elite 1 Para unit which has been assigned the task of urban warfare and covert as well as overt operations across the Indian Territory and sometimes deep inside across the borders.

The once this so thin and skinny teenager who gave his entrance examination to enroll into the defence forces, after getting inspired from his elder brother’s efforts and dedication, was at Government Engineering College Shegaon, Maharashtra. Although he was there but his whole mind and heart were just waiting for one call so that he can move for the personal interview level. And as it goes “we always reach there where we ought to” came true in his case too. He cleared the National Defence Academy’s entrance and was called for the personal interview. But as like all the parents are concerned about their children, mother hid the call letter from him. But how could she have stopped her son from making a trunk call directly to UPSC and to get verified whether he made it or not? And when he came to know about the news he was waiting for so lon , he made the decision and without wasting any time he packed his luggage and reached his home in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh. And obviously his unexpected arrival made his parents both amazed and aghast at the same time. But they could have hardly done anything as the boy had decided to make a move which was next to irreversible for sure.

So here comes the deadline for intervie . But prior to that there was one more test was waiting for the officer in making. As defence forces are well known for their sets of criteria and the level of adherence they have for those criterias. same was the issue with him too as he was underweight by the minimum weight required for his category. Initially it disturbed him , but how could this thing has stopped a hell bent person from achieving his dream. So he modified the diet chart and started following that so he can have more and more protein intake in his body. As a result of this meticulous planning along with the zeal to conquer helped him and he crossed the minimum benchmark of the weight for his category successfully.

So after these all planning and dedicated efforts when the merit list came out it had in it ,along with many others, the name of Mrs Sushila Sharma and Mr Rajendra Sharma’s younger son Mohit Sharma. He was selected for National Defence Academy which is situated in one of the Maharashtra’s beautiful and Cosmopolitan cities, Pune. So after packing up his bag and rest of the luggage Mohit left for NDA leaving behind a proud yet worrying parents and elder brother in his home city Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh. So as the course went on Mohit started to learn many things and as well as continuously polishing his works where he used to excel alongwith the new lessons he learnt during his 3 years long course. After the 3 years basic training at NDA Cadet Mohit moved to Dehradun based Indian Military Academy for one year where he won many trophies including the trophy for excellence and was adjudged best cadet of the course. Here after Cadet Mohit was commissioned in Indian Army’s one of the oldest regiment i.e. Madras Regiment 5 battalion as second lieutenant.

Major Mohit Sharma

In 2000, after joining the duty he was sent to Poonch – Rajouri sector to work with 35 Rashtriya Rifles (RR). While working and conducting many counter insurgency operations, high altitude cordon and search operations, foot patrolling, urban warfare and many other types of specialised operations Mohit Sharma displayed the firmness and grit in him. Also the deployment of Para special forces along with the infantry units made Mohit Sharma a curious aspirant who now wanted to join the elite battalion of the Indian Army. So after rigorously preparing for the entrance and taking the guidance of Para special forces officers Captain Mohit appeared for the induction course in 2003 but unfortunately due to bad health he couldn’t clear the course. But this setback didn’t come in between the officer and his dream for which he worked so hard.

As a result Captain Mohit Sharma made it in his second attempt in 2004. Now he was allowed to wear the Maroon beret which only few out of many afford to wear. But before beginning his journey as a paratrooper Captain Mohit was awarded the Chief of the Army staff’s commendation letter for his brave and courageous work during Operation Parakram, which was launched in the backdrop of 2001 Parliament attack on Indian soil. Although the level of satisfaction and happiness was high as he cleared the prestigious training stage to become a para commando but his already worried mother was now more furious after knowing the fact that his son has volunteered for most risky job. But as usual who could have stopped the fire in Mohit? The fire to serve the motherland, the fire of being a best of the best . Hence he assuaged his mother as he was now posted in Chandimandir base, Chandigarh.

Journey as a Para Trooper

As soon as Mohit joined the 1 Para, he was sent to Kashmir again to guard the hot bed of south Kashmir’s Shopian. The place was witnessing the turbulence and continuous rise of militancy and cross border terrorism. At that time this place was used to be the den for Hizbul Mujahideen whose main intention was always to keep the urge of Independence and carry out false flag operations in the valley. Abu Torara and Abu Sabzar were the commander of Hizbul that time who were involved in multiple civilians and security force personnel killings. So it was obvious that they were in the radar of security forces for long, but still out of reach from the hands of security forces.

But as the proverb goes “some day you get the bear, while other day the bear gets you”. Here the months long planning and detailing by many agencies combined resulted in drafting a full proof plan to give a strong joilt to Hizbul in some days down the line. The men planned to carry a covet operation for which a guy who resembles much like the local Kashmiri will infiltrate the Hizbul top ranks and after getting them in his confidence will carry out his operation. So here comes again the man of crude courage who volunteered himself for the operation which could be as risky as getting himself killed, if even a minute negligence happens. But this was also true if they had to finish them some one had to take the risk, and that was Captain Mohit Sharma.

Thus to carry out this operation Mohit took the look of an young Kashmiri guy with a long and bushy beards, hair hanging around his shoulder and wearing a Pheran (Kashmiri outfit) and a Kashmiri name Iftikaar Bhatt. With his planning and details he was able to infiltrate and take into confidence the top heads of the Hizbul Mujahideen. He displayed them the anger against the Indian forces, whom he accused to have killed his brother 3 years back. But what made Abu Sabjar and Abu Torara to believe him was his full proof ground work, survey, exact locations to attack and cause severe casualties of security forces. Thus they three decided a date on which they will carry out the attack on the check point party of security forces.

Major sharma in his Iftikhar’s look

But a day prior to the attack Sabzar got doubtful of Iftikhar and asked him about his details again as he was not agreeing to the fact that how someone could have this level of planning. In response as soon as Iftikhar hear all this he dropped his rifle and shouted like a furious young man, who said shoot me if you don’t trust me. Torara was watching this closely and was amazed that how a silent boy can go so berserk! But before they could have even a thought of anything else, Iftikhar pulled out his 9 mm pistol and fired 4 bullets, distributing 2 each on both the commanders body. They were dead. Sabzar and Torara were dead. The officer from 1 para has achieved his target without a bit of mistake or negligence. Then Mohit waited for the sun to set and as soon as it did, he started his foot journey towards the base of 1 Para where he was known as Mohit Sharma, not Iftikaar Bhatt!

  • Credits:-
  • India most fearless -2 by Shiv Aroor and Rahul Singh
  • The liberal hindu youtube channel
  • Honourpoint youtube channel

Sonam Kapoor, Karma and Caste: How left-liberal ecosystem normalizes casteism

0

It might be a clement Sunday across the elite households of India and it’s one of those days approved by the western standards to celebrate Manhood: Its Father’s Day. While everyday Paer Chhoona (touching elder’s feet) is too oppressive, patriarchal, and Hindu-centric, a full day to celebrate manhood is very much liberal, progressive, and Secular too.

Festivities aside, Sonam Kapoor, the upper-caste liberal, chose to share the father’s day wishes by thanking her Karma to be Anil’s daughter. There is no better way to rub the wounds of people living across the moat than by bringing her karmic-caste card to the table. These avoidable Freudian-slips coming from the self-certified civilized society is worrisome. 

Caste-Karma Connection: 

Sonam Kapoor who is a practicing Hindu and claims to be aware of Hindu philosophies in the past, audaciously credited her privilege to her Karma. Sonam might not have explicitly unleashed her caste, the connection of Karma and privilege leads to caste-system. The caste and karma are intertwined by the actions of an individual during the cycle of life and death. The position a soul in the hierarchy of the caste system correlates to the accumulated Karma of the past. A person who has sufficient good karmas in their previous lives is reborn into a higher caste, with privilege and resourcefulness and a person of bad karma is reborn into other rungs of caste hierarchy depending on their karma. This is not only insulting the aspirations of Dalits by blaming them for their suffering. The statement is absolving ourselves as a civilized society by blaming everything on Karma. 

Quiet Colleagues:

Bollywood, the forefront voluntary organization for fighting casteism, nepotism, among other social evils by promoting equality, meritocracy is yet to analyze and respond to the situation. While Sonam Kapoor might have emasculated the part-time civil-rights activist Swara Bhaskar on the sets of Veer di Wedding, we are yet to hear from other lesser-known celebrities to condemn or at least clarify that Sonam did not mean to what she meant. It’s Sunday, so there will be a comfortable silence across the Bollywood spectrum.

Caste and Left-ecosystem:

The practice of using caste to reason privilege is widely accepted in the left-liberal ecosystem. While center-right political organizations like BJP fights casteism by promoting less-advantaged communities to the positions of power, Left-wing organizations actively prevent this by deploying structural obstacles to keep the positions of power with their grip. Almost all the well-known Dalit activists in Academia, far-left Media organizations are from Upper-caste. The Dalit leadership among the left-ecosystem has deteriorated from laughable to sheer tragedy. 

Importance of Caste for Left-wing politics:

Caste eradication would undoubtedly strengthen the foundations of modern India and it would sharpen the soft-power of Indian-Hindu culture. A caste-less society will eventually move forward to a classless society, thanks to capitalism and the free-market. This increasing equality among demographics would threaten the survival of Communism.

The rise of Narendra Modi was the first step towards this shared goal. He broke the web of castes laid by the left-wing organizations by uniting them under common good. The defeat forced the leftwing back to the fortress of Barad-dûr only to conspire and retaliate. At the moment, the only thing which makes them relevant in the political landscape is to do the exact opposite of whatever Modi does, resulting in the venomous reflex of labeling caste on every good and bad. They desire to look into caste in everything that moves except themselves because Left-liberals are fully aware of their shameless caste-ridden structures which they relentlessly accuse of the right-wing.

Finally, the goal of the left-liberal, upper-caste committee is not to eradicate the caste system but to create a mirage of inequality among center-right organizations and use the Dalits and other disadvantaged sections of the society as their foot soldiers till their western-educated progenies return to continue the vicious cycle.

Through the human mind: The recent rise of ‘Hindutva.’

0

When two brothers fight and the mother advises the older one to be bountiful with his younger brother, compromising his own cravings, there obviously will rise a sense of resentment in the elder brother’s psyche, as it is the human nature. As I write this article, I would like to make it clear in the very beginning that I do not espouse any political ideology and whatsoever I am writing, is based on my observation on Hindutva and the views of some Hindutva-aligned people. This article will help you understand the ideological upheavals through the understanding of human nature. Once again, let me make it clear that I do not justify the unprecedented value attached to any political or religious ideology but when it comes down to human behaviour, you can easily find it pertinent.

  1. It all starts before Independence. Mahatma Gandhi, the father of nation, setting the example of solidarity and religious tolerance, read Quran in a Temple. What riled Hindus of that time (for eg. Nathuram Godse) is the fact that he never read Gita in a Mosque. If religious tolerance was to be shown, Hindus believed, it should have been from both sides. Right? (I have just cited an example and don’t justify the killing of Mahatma Gandhi).
  2. After Independence, when our Constitution came to force, Hindus again felt they were discriminated against. This was primarily because of Article 30 in the Indian Constitution that states:

(1) “All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.”
(1A)” In making any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of an educational institution established and administered by a minority referred to in clause (1), the State shall ensure that the amount fixed by or determined under such law for the acquisition of such property is such as would not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed under that clause.”
(2) “The State shall not, in granting aid to educational institutions, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, whether based on religion or language.”
Lately, Hindus have been on their toes and continuously speaking against this Article that they feel is a great damage to the idea of equality enshrined in the constitution. If there supposed to be no discrimination against any religion, why has then this right been denied to Hindus? Why can’t they too run their educational institution?

  1. The next point that has been in the centre of all debates for a few years now, is pseudo-secularism. Some right-wing people feel that in the name of secularism, their sentiments have always been disregarded. It is certainly not wrong to return the awards (award-wapsi) on any untoward incident in the country (like mob lynching) but what right-wing people demand is the similar outrage from this award-wapsi group on the incident concerning any Hindu. There was a letter written to the Prime Minister by 49 dignitaries on ‘lynching of Muslims and Dalits’ but when any Hindu falls prey to such an incident, there doesn’t seem the same concern from these people. One could feel it during the recent Palghar incident. Does the lynching of a Hindu not weaken the secular fabric of the country? This is what that has been termed as selective outrage and it has significantly affected the Hindu-Muslim bond.

Hindutva is not about being mean or selfish but as I said, I will write this piece keeping in view the human nature, it all will lead you to the abyss of partiality and biased politics. Secularism means the belief that religion should not influence or be involved in the organization of society, education, government, etc. From this perspective, is India really a secular state?

Why has there always been the politics of appeasement in a secular state? Why don’t the judiciary keep a check on this as it is against the constitutional values? Different parties seem to favour different communities for their vested interests, stirring violence and riots. We might have just got accustomed to this practice of appeasement by now but the fact is, until and unless it exists, there can never be an end to the Hindu-Muslim divide in the country. Equality means equality for everyone, irrespective of majority or minority. I conclude that you can never bring peace to a varied nation like India by favouring one community and discriminating against the other. It is true for every political party. They know the human weakness well and keep playing with the people for their agenda.

©Archana Mishra.

पाकिस्तान की डोंकी डिप्लोमेसी!

0

दुनिया के सारे देश एक दूसरे से व्यपार करते हैं। सोना चांदी, हीरे- मोती, कार-जीप, दावा-दारू, खरीदते- बेचते हैं। ये नार्मल है, सामान्य सी बात है। लेकिन हमारे दो पड़ोसियों चीन और पाकिस्तान के आपस के व्यापार और डिप्लोमेसी की बात ही निराली है। बिज़नेस हो या डिप्लोमेसी, एक अलग ही लेवल पर ले जाते हैं!

हाल ही में पाकिस्तान के वजीर-ए-आज़म ने फरमाया कि पाकिस्तान में गधो की संख्या काफी हो गई है। लोग बाग-बाग हो गए, पाकिस्तान के। इमरान मियां को बड़ी शाबाशियाँ मिली। आखिर खुश होने की बात भी थी। गधे होंगे तो फिर चीन को बेचेंगे। पाक-चीन के व्यापारिक और डिप्लोमेटिक संबंध गहरे होंगे। फिर चीन डोंकी मनी भी तो देगा। पाकिस्तान में फिर से खुशहाली छा जाएगी। गधा पाकिस्तान की अर्थव्यवस्था का सारथी जो ठहरा!

वैसे मीडिया ने यह भी बताया कि गधों की बात सुन चीन के कम्युनिस्ट नेता शी जिनपिंग भी खुशी से झूम उठे। लेकिन ये बात मुझे हजम नही होती है। कम्युनिस्टों का तर्कवाद के प्रति गहरा लगाव है। कार्ल मार्क्स, लेनिन और माओ ने तर्क को ही तारणहार बताया था। दुनियां को तर्क पर ही टिक हुआ बताया था। “कम्युनिस्ट मैनिफेस्टो” ही जीवन दर्शन था! अब ऐसे माहौल में शी जिनपिंग का अतार्किक गधों से प्रेम समझ से पर है। कहाँ घोर अड़ियल गधे और कहाँ घोर तार्किक साम्यवाद! पेटा (PETA) वालों से और मेनका गांधी से माफी चाहूंगा!

वैसे बात यहीं खत्म नहीं होती। चीनियों- पाकिस्तानियों का व्यापर और डिप्लोमेसी आजकल एक्सोटिक (exotic) चीजों पर ही फोकस्ड है। गधो के अलावा चीनी आजकल पाकिस्तानियों के बाल भी मांग रहे है। जी हाँ, आपने सही पढ़ा! पाकिस्तानी कटे हुए बाल बेच कर अच्छा मुनाफा कमा रहे है! नाईं बड़े गुस्से में हैं वहां के, बोल रहे, अब तो किरकिट खेलने वाले लौंडे भी उस्तरा ले के घूम रहे!

वैसे आप लोग ये समझ रहे होंगे की ये सब मजाक है। लेकिन बात है ये, सौ परसेंट सही! ये पाकिस्तान की सीक्रेट डंकी डिप्लोमेसी है! जनरल बाजवा का टॉप सीक्रेट प्लान है, शी जिनपिंग को खुश करने के लिए!

लगे हाथ ये भी बात दूँ , उन लोगों को, जिन्हें अंतरराष्ट्रीय संबंधों में रुची नही है कि “शी जिनपिंग” वास्तव में “ही जिनपिंग” हैं। महिला नहीं हैं!!और दूसरी बात यह कि पाकिस्तान कई मिलियन डॉलर गधो और बालों से वाकई कमा लेता है! एक गधे के पचास हज़ार और एक लाख किलो बालों के एक लाख बत्तीस हज़ार अमेरिकी डॉलर!गूगल कर लीजियेगा, विश्वास न हो तो!

Corporatization of Bollywood and the death of Sushant Singh Rajput

0

2020 is the year of mega happenings! Amid the Corona pandemic and Indo-china skirmishes, the incident which has created the buzz in household and social circles is the death of Bollywood actor Sushant Singh Rathore. The actor was found dead in his Bandra apartment, in Mumbai, last Monday. Prima facie, the cause of death seems to be one of suicide. But the question which looms large among the masses is whether the suicide was circumstantial? Was Sushant a victim of corporatization of Bollywood? Was his death part of a larger conspiracy? These question have popped up more so after outrage from industry insiders; Kangana Ranaut, Abhinav Singh Kashyap, Payal Rohatgi et al dared to raise their voice against the nepotism, favoritism, bullyism and mafiaism being practiced in the Indian entertainment world.

It is well settled and accepted that all has never been well in the show biz industry. Connection with underworld was flourishing since the time of Haji Mastan. Nepotism, harassment and the exploitation of newcomers in the form of casting couch is too well known. Many actresses and actors have frequently complained of casting couch. #Me Too Movement spearheaded by one of the leading actress Tanushree Dutta is a pointer to that end.

The demise of Sushant has once again made alive all the debates and discussions, which remained dormant and suppressed for long. Leading actress Kangana Ranaut vociferously spoke against karan Johar, labeling him as “flag bearer of nepotism” and blaming him for the suicide of Sushant. The role of Johar’s company Yash Raj Films (YRF) is also under scanner. Another actor Kamal Rashid Khan had tweeted much earlier in February this year that certain production houses have designs to sabotage the career of Sushant. The Director of “Dabangg” (2010) fame Anubhav Singh Kashyap also came out in open and described the “toxic work culture” and modus operandi of movie production houses and talent management agencies who work in tandem with certain Bollywood families to control the whole entertainment industry, by means fair or foul, in a “Dabangg” style! Many other cine artists namely Koena Mitra, Prakash Raj and Sahil Khan too joined the party, to portray, what ails the Bollywood.

Conversely, a parallel narrative was also built maligning Sushant Singh Rajput. Mahesh Bhatt and Deepika Padukone, both of them, among many others, termed the case of Sushant as one of “mental illness” and for which Bhatt claimed no remedy! In short, the prodigious star of Bollywood was disowned, the moment he died! The chivalrous behavior of Bollywood was missing!

However, there is a history to the current tail of events. Beginning 70s and 80s, Bollywood was a rather unorganized structure. Mafias, underworld and politicians were investing in Bollywood to earn as well as launder the money; to make it white. The system continued for a while and many a film stars were a victim of these malaise: T-Series’ Gulshan Kumar had to lose his life and actor turned director-producer Rakesh Raushan had a lucky bullet escape outside his office in Mumbai! The situation changed a bit post Mumbai bomb blasts of 1993. In the year 2001, through a governmental notification, films and movies were made eligible for institutional finance. This marked a watershed as the availability of institutional finance ended the huge reliance of Bollywood on ill- gotten money and further paved way for corporatization of Indian entertainment world. With this 2001 notification, the entertainment world formally and legally attained the status of “industry”.

This corporatization led to emergence of big production houses who were in cahoots with the leading families of the Bollywood. These talent management agencies and production houses scouted the talents to monopolize their intellectual property aka stardom through the vicious legal contracts limiting their talent, reach, expanse and career. This colonizing nexus, further, became strong and well entrenched even as to put the dissenting actors’ career in jeopardy. Many an acting talents were rendered jobless by kicking them out of movie projects, lest they agree to fall in line. Some newbies even sailed against the tide. They wanted to work it out through hard work, talent and skill but found it extremely difficult and harassing. The victims either left the industry or were lost in oblivion.

In the similar manner the small town boy Sushant Singh Rajput was trapped. The promising actor in a short span of time gave many hits including Shuddh Desi Romance (2013), PK (2014), Kedarnath (2018), Chhichore (2019) and a biopic on the life of legendary Mahindra Singh Dhoni, among others. Sushant Singh Rajput’s talent was never recognized. He missed the podium and cinematic awards, by miles. Sushant became a victim of casting blues!  The actor,seemingly, lapsed into depression, dejection, rejection and medication. As per reports and statements after the movie “Chhichore” (2019) he was kicked out of seven movies and in one particular case became the victim of perfidy perpetuated by the Director/Producer Karan Johar. Reportedly, a movie named “Drive” produced by Karan Johar was released on Netflix, contrary to the expectations, to release the movie on big screen multiplexes.

The issue has subtle legal angle as well; whether to consider the case as one of suicide and close the matter or consider the case as one of abetting to commit suicide and held the suspects liable for the creation of circumstances and imputed negligence which forced Sushant to commit suicide. As luck would have often, the investigative agencies may fail to establish the guilt for want of evidence but one thing is pretty clear that the incident is just the tip of iceberg.

To sum it up, in the Bollywood, which is one of the repository of Indian Art and artistic expressions, as well as a powerful medium of communication, the role of senior members of the fraternity ought to be of a guardian and a mentor. It is the seniors who nourish, supplant and help grow, a budding and promising talent. Those who are protectors are not expected to be devourers. The film industry is the soft power of India and has to behove as such. It will have to emerge responsible, professional and make it count that no Sushant Singh Rajpoot ever meets such fate, in the years to come.

शमशान के वैराग्य सा व्यवहार- “मैं हूँ ना”

बॉलीवुड के एक कलाकार ने आत्महत्या कर ली. कारण मानसिक अवसाद बताया गया. लोकप्रिय कलाकार था इसलिए अवसाद और मानसिक स्वास्थ्य पर मीडिया के सभी माध्यमों पर व्यापक चर्चा प्रारंभ हो गयी. फेसबुक, व्हाट्स एप जैसे सोशल मीडिया माध्यमों पर तो ऐसे संदेशों की बाढ़ आ गयी जो कहते हैं, “मेरा घर, मेरा डीएम सदा आपके लिए खुला है, जब चाहे बेझिझक आकर अपनी बात कहें”. मूलतः ये फ़ॉर्वर्डेड या कॉपी पेस्ट सन्देश हैं जो भेजने वाले द्वारा अपनी संवेदनशीलता के कार्बन चरण चिन्ह बनाने के लिए प्रस्तुत किये जा रहे हैं. इसके साथ कुछ ज्ञानवर्धक उपदेशात्मक सन्देश भी आ रहे हैं. जैसे– अवसाद बीमारी है, इसका इलाज़ है. मानसिक रोग को छुपाइये नहीं. हम भारतीय मानसिक रोग को ठीक होने योग्य नहीं समझते इत्यादि और ऐसा पहली बार नहीं हो रहा है कुछ एक दो वर्ष पूर्व छोटे परदे की एक कलाकार ने आत्महत्या की थी तब भी कुछ ऐसा ही प्रकटीकरण हुआ था. “मानसिक स्वास्थ्य दिवस” पर भी ऐसे संदेशों की बाढ़ आती है.

एक समाज के रूप में मानसिक स्वास्थ्य के प्रति ये हमारा शमशान के वैराग्य सा व्यवहार है, जब तक चिता जल नहीं जाती तब तक जीवन से वैराग्य रहता है और बाहर आकर स्नान करते ही वो वैराग्य भी धुल जाता है. आत्महत्या (कोई भी आत्महत्या उद्वेलित या अवसादग्रस्त मानसिक स्थिति का ही परिणाम है) की किसी एक घटना से उपजा दुःख जितनी देर रहता है उतनी ही देर हमारी ये, “मैं हूँ ना” वाली सामाजिक चेतना भी रहती है. स्वाभाविक भी है क्योंकि हम उस दुःख को भूल दैनिक जीवन में आगे बढ़ जाते हैं. यदि हम सरकार द्वारा मानसिक स्वास्थ्य के विषय में किये जा रहे प्रयासों को देखें तो वर्ष  1982 से ही राष्ट्रीय मानसिक स्वास्थ्य कार्यक्रम चलाया जा रहा है जो अब राष्ट्रीय स्वास्थ्य मिशन का अंग है और इसके पास पर्याप्त आर्थिक प्रावधान हैं, किन्तु यह विषय की एक अन्य दिशा है आज हम उस ओर न जाकर केवल मानसिक उद्विग्नता और अवसाद को प्रश्रय देने वाले अपने सामाजिक व्यवहार पर ही केन्द्रित रहेंगे.

हम प्रतिद्वन्द्विता के समय में जी रहे हैं. स्वस्थ प्रतियोगिता पीछे छूट गयी है. शिशु जन्म के समय माता –पिता और परिवार अपने समाज के अन्य लोगों के साथ प्रतिद्वन्द्विता में होता है कि शिशु जन्म कहाँ हो, सरकारी अस्पताल में या निजी में, निजी में तो थ्री स्टार में या फाइव स्टार में? जहाँ “उनका” हुआ था उससे अच्छे में होना चाहिए. कुछ दिनों बाद दूसरे रिश्तेदारों से अच्छा बेबी फ़ूड देने की प्रतिद्वन्द्विता, फिर विद्यालय चुनाव और एक बार बच्चा विद्यालय पहुँच गया तो वो भी उसी प्रतिद्वन्द्विता का अंग बनकर रह गया. शिक्षा व्यवस्था तो प्रशंसनीय है, अपने प्रचार –प्रसार के लिए विद्यालय कुछ भी करते हैं. कक्षा पांच का एक बच्चा, अध्यापिका के लिखाये छह प्रश्नोत्तर रट कर वापस परीक्षा की उत्तर पुस्तिका में लिख आता है. कक्षा में प्रथम आता है. उसके माता -पिता को विद्यालय में फूलों की तुला पर बिठाया जाता है और सारे समाचार पत्रों और स्थानीय मीडिया चैनलों में स्तुति गान होता है. बच्चा तो अभी बच्चा ही है, इस दिखावे में माता –पिता, दादा-दादी नाना- नानी किसी को समझ में नहीं आता कि क्या है जो छूट रहा है? वो प्रतिद्वन्द्विता में व्यस्त हैं. अपने समाज में अपनी धाक जमा रहे हैं. अपने अहम को संतुष्ट कर रहे हैं. किसी भी दिन जब ये बच्चा असफल होता है तो बच्चे से अधिक तनाव और अवसादग्रस्त उसका परिवार होता है. वो स्वयं उबरेगा या बच्चे को संभालेगा? जब तक परिवारों के बड़े, संतानों की सफलता –असफलता, हार –जीत जैसी बातों को अपनी सामाजिक प्रतिष्ठा का मापदंड बनाये रखेंगे संतानें स्वाभाविक रूप से तनाव और अवसाद का शिकार होंगी और अतृप्ति में जीते ये लोग उन्हें राह नहीं दिखा पाएंगे.

कार्यस्थल चाहे किसी भी क्षेत्र का हो शिक्षा, कला, विज्ञान और चाहे  व्यवसाय हो, नौकरी हो या अपना कोई पेशेवर अभ्यास आगे बढ़ना है, सफलता पानी है, कुछ कर दिखाना है तो प्रतिद्वन्द्विता के उबलते पानी की नदी में उतरना ही होगा. जहाँ सभी जीतने के लिए उबलते पानी में तैर रहे हों वहाँ कोई किसी की तकलीफें साझा करने के लिए नहीं रुकेगा ये कटु सत्य है. कोई दूसरे को धक्का देकर या रौंद कर आगे नहीं बढ़ेगा ये भी संभव नहीं है जिसको भी ऐसा करने का अवसर मिलेगा वो ऐसा करेगा. तनाव और अवसाद में जाने के पर्याप्त कारण हैं यहाँ. पारिवारिक जीवन में उपभोक्तावादी संस्कृति ने दिखावे का इतना बोझ रख दिया है कि लोग परिवार लेकर नहीं तनाव लेकर चलते हैं.

वस्तुतः क्षणिक आवेग में ये जो, “मैं हूँ ना” की बात कही जाती है ये आज के सामाजिक ताने बाने में तब तक वास्तविक रूप नहीं ले पायेगी जब तक समाज अपने “प्रतिद्वान्द्वात्मक व्यवहार” को नहीं बदलता. इस परिमार्जन में समय लगेगा. यदि समाज के मानसिक स्वास्थ्य को सुधारना है तो शिक्षा के मूल ढांचे में आध्यात्मिक शिक्षा को स्थान दिया जाना अनिवार्य है. ऐसी आध्यात्मिक शिक्षा जो असफलताओं, दुष्चक्रों, दुर्व्यवहारों से उपजी हताशा, निराशा, दुःख और अवसाद पर विजय पाने का सामर्थ्य दे. जो हर समय राह दिखाती रहे कि एक मनुष्य के रूप में अपनी भौतिक दौड़ को सम पर रहते हुए कैसे पूरा करना है. ऐसी आध्यात्मिक शिक्षा जो  “तत-त्वम्-असि” का विश्वास दिलाए और मनुष्य कभी एकाकी अनुभव न करे. आध्यात्मिक शिक्षा ही एक सफल, तनाव और अवसाद रहित संतुष्ट, विचारवान, गतिमान और अग्रगामी समाज का आधार है इसकी अनुपस्थिति में कोई भी उच्च शिक्षा, कला, कौशल या  प्रतिभा भी तनाव और अवसाद का कारण बनती है.