Nehru's fabricated secularism

The Indian freedom struggle led by the Congress, was no better than some sort of political negotiation only.

Gradually, but in a determined manner, present India is trying to reclaim its indigenous glory and heritage of benign Indic Civilization which is at least five thousand years old.

आरंभिक दिनो मे इस पार्टी का उद्देश्य ब्रिटेन से भारत की आजादी की लड़ाई लड़ना नहीं था। कांग्रेस का गठन देश के प्रबुद्ध लोगों को एक मंच पर साथ लाने के उद्देश्य से किया गया था ताकि देश के लोगों के लिए नीतियों के निर्माण में मदद मिल सके। क्रांतिकारीयों के गतिविधियों का पता लगाया जा सके और उनके आंदोलन को कूचला जा सके।

For decades starting from Nehru to Manmohan Singh, Congress has always been hesitant to embrace, accept and acknowledge the 'Sanatan heritage' of India. For the first time in history, the Hindu vote bank is making its presence felt.The political vanvas of Hindus is finally over.

Nehru’s propaganda and involvement in Non-Align Movement (NAM) was fraudulent. In the height of Cold War, the philosophy of non-alignment was romantically acceptable to him.

Congress party has been carrying the legacy of Nehru-Gandhi family as epitome of its misplaced democratic value. The Congress members, with slave mentality, have been endorsing that national party for decades as personal business of Nehru-Gandhi family.

The kind of hatred and animosity spread towards him by a section of the media has instinctively poured oil on the stomach of the pseudosecular gang and so they have started praising Nehru.

The most important times of Nehru's stint as the Prime Minister are littered with grave mistakes threatened to moribund the rising Indian state.

Nehru and Congress could neither save non-Muslims of Pakistan & Bangladesh, nor could Indianise the descendants of Indian Muslim Leaguers. With development of leftist, liberal and secular Indian Hindus, who have been supporting Islamist cause, the situation has turned for the worse now.

If we look the legality of secular and socialist words in terms of constitution and constitution related cases we find that in two scenarios- 42th amendment in which secular and socialist words in preamble can legally be challenged.