Home Blog Page 684

Cross pathy jettison AYUSH philosophy and healthy India

0

Our ancient Hindu culture, its practices and tradition always promote the philosophy of “Ayur Arogya Aishwarya Abhivrudhirasrthu”. The essence of Hindu philosophy is not just meant for Hindus alone but it always wish for the wellness and happiness of the entire universe. Even in the divine worship, Hinduism promotes the importance universal health, wellness and happiness.

The fundamental philosophy of Hinduism is all about wellness and happiness of all beings that lives everywhere.  Hindu tradition through its sacred verse “Lokha Samastah Sukhino Bhavantu” inscribe in the minds of Hindus to work for the happiness of the entire universe.

To lead people on right path, Hinduism also elaborates further that:

“Dharmo eva hato hantee dharmo rakshati rakshitaah
Tasmadhrmo na hantabhyo  maa no dharmo hatovadhit“

Dharma would destroy those who destroy dharma (the righteousness) and protect those who protect dharma and the dharma cannot be destroyed.

The wellness cum paramedical philosophy of AYUSH has come as an extension of Hinduism and its associated traditional practices. AYUSH contains several recipes for happy and healthy life. But the big question is why and how such wonderful philosophy we have started to miss and why the Government has to spent lots of money to promote our own heritage and tradition back to us, which is 5000 years old?

Why and how we, the Indians born in the great tradition of Hinduism and been living through such sacred Hindu culture (irrespective of the fact whether one follows Hinduism or other religious practices) have forgotten the values of AYSUH philosophy and lost the essence of wellness in our hunt for wealth?

Like all roads lead to Rome, answer to the above questions would lead us to cross pathy by several AYUSH Vaidyas in private practice as the credible reason for why AYUSH has lost its charm. Cross pathy by several AYUSH Vaidyas in private practice has destroyed the faith and credibility of the system among people who consult such AYUSH Vaidyas.

Definitely those Siddha vaidyas in Tamil Nadu who engage in cross pathy have seriously impaired and jettison the Siddha system and its values.

India is a diverse, large, over populated country with high level of poverty and illiteracy. The medical practitioners in private practice and those private clinics only predominantly cater the health care needs of people. Although Modiji has taken special interest to provide best and cost effective health care system to poor people but the mission has not fully reached every nook and corner of the state.

In the last 15-20 years, large number of the AYUSH vaidyas after qualifying from institutions especially some of those who could not join government service has migrated to cross pathy in their private practice. Many of them appeared to have ignored & neglected own system and forgotten the importance of wellness and health. Wellness and health are the precursor for a healthy country and not surgery and surgical knife. AYUSH is a wonderful wellness providing paramedical system.

When the patients get allopathic prescriptions from AYUSH Vaidyas, naturally the patients in all likelihood would think allopathy to be the medical system and not AYUSH and that is why even the AYUSH Vaidyas prescribe allopathic drugs. Most of the health problems at the early stage may require only wellness tips, paramedical attention and certain life style changes.

Since AYUSH has evolved with rich philosophy and Hindu sacredness, the promotion strategy of AYUSH should be liberal and must mandate the AYUSH experts to promote the system for wellness of mind and body and for certain definite paramedical benefits.

Unless the Ministry of AYUSH and the Government of India orient the AYUSH Vaidyas in private practice to be more responsible in promoting own system instead of migrating to allopathy, the system will never able to serve humanity better.

It is not the general public who doubt or suspect AYUSH but several AYUSH Vaidyas in private practice are the one who appears to lack trust and pride in AYUSH. Time is not too late, let us bring back the glory of AYUSH and make India healthy and happy. Let us not allow cross pathy the destroy AYUSH.

Antics of Prashant Bhushan and Arundhati Roy, defamatory lies and support to criminals

0

Supreme Court advocate and ‘activist’ and former AAP leader Prashant Bhushan has written an article in The Indian Express condemning the arrest of 5 leftist activists by Maharashtra Police, who are accused of supporting Naxals. Booker Prize winner and ultra-Leftist Arundhati Roy too has condemned their arrest and both of them instead demanded action against the police for arresting them! It needs to be remembered here that Prashant Bhushan was the lawyer of Arundhati Roy in the past, in 2002 at least.

It is necessary to know the antics of Prashant Bhushan and Arundhati Roy in the past, to know who they are. Our website www.gujaratriots.com as well as OpIndia have in the past exposed Arundhati Roy’s lies in her 7 page-long (approx. 6000 words) essay in Outlook dated 6 May 2002 on the violence in Gujarat. She wrote: “Last night a friend from Baroda called. Weeping. It took her fifteen minutes to tell me what the matter was. It wasn’t very complicated. Only that Sayeeda, a friend of hers, had been caught by a mob. Only that her stomach had been ripped open and stuffed with burning rags. Only that after she died, someone carved ‘OM’ on her forehead”.

Shocked by this despicable “incident”, the then BJP Rajya Sabha MP Balbir Punj got in touch with the Gujarat government. The police investigations revealed that no such case, involving someone called Sayeeda, had been reported either in urban or rural Baroda. Subsequently, the police sought Roy’s help to identify the victim and seek access to witnesses who could lead them to those guilty of this crime. But the police got no cooperation. Instead, Roy, through her lawyer Prashant Bhushan replied that the police had no power to issue summons. Thus she hedged behind technical excuses. Balbir Punj took up this incident in his rejoinder published as Dissimulation In Word and Images in Outlook, July 8, 2002.

This incidentally also exposes Prashant Bhushan as a liar, and an accomplice-in-crime of Arundhati Roy. He too knew that that story by Arundhati Roy was concocted and not true, but he defended Arundhati Roy on some technical excuse. There are many more lies that Arundhati Roy wrote in that article, as well as in an ‘apology’ she gave later, which we will see later.

Prashant Bhushan has defended the fanatic Muslims who roasted the train in Godhra on 27 February 2002, even after the conviction of 31 Muslims by the trial court on 22 Feb 2011. He said “The case is based on wrong premise that warrants a re-investigation”. The investigation was done by an SIT ordered and monitored by the Supreme Court of India, constituted on a petition by Zakia Jafri, the widow of Ehsan Jafri. What is the ‘wrong premise’ of the Godhra case? None. Why should there be a ‘re-investigation’- just because the investigation proved the guilt of fanatic Muslims? He also said: “On any account, the sentenced persons cannot be charged with murder and conspiracy. At the worst, they should be charged for arson,” he said after their conviction. Why? Who roasted the 59 Ram sewaks including 25 women and 15 children to coal in Godhra, if not the attackers? Why should they not be charged with murder and conspiracy? There was a judicial confession in February 2003 by one accused that Godhra was a planned conspiracy, and that he had himself taken part in it, and looted the Ramsevaks’ belongings before setting the train afire, though he later retracted it in August 2003. Besides, it is impossible for Godhra to have been anything but planned, otherwise a mob of 2000 cannot assemble in 5 minutes having got 140 litres of petrol, and acid bombs and petrol bombs at 7:48 am.

Prashant Bhushan refused to accept that Muslims burnt the train in Godhra, even after their conviction. The outrage after Godhra should have been at least as much as that after Nirbhaya or Kathua. Even such a horrific massacre could not melt Bhushan’s heart and he defended such brutal killers. Is it any surprise then that he will support supporters of Naxals, and instead demand action against the Police for arresting them? Such a supporter of horrific, barbaric killers needs to be exposed for who he is, and not be allowed to be labeled as an ‘activist’.

On Godhra, the mainstream parties and UPA Government defended the horrific killers who roasted to coal 59 despite knowing fully well that Muslims burnt the train in the densely Muslim-dominated Signal Falia area of Godhra. It is one thing to defend some accused of Godhra saying: “They were not a part of the mob which burnt the train”. It is quite another to deny totally that any mob burnt the train and call it as an ‘accident’ or allege that the train was instead burnt by VHP or BJP. The UPA constituted a fake Banerjee Committee, which whitewashed the heinous crime of the fanatic Muslims, and called it an ‘accident’ in Jan 2005. Even the Banerjee Committee said that Godhra was an accident, it did not say that BJP-RSS men did it. But Lalu Yadav went to a level even below that of U C Banerjee. In Jan-Feb 2005, Lalu campaigned in rallies in Bihar saying “BJP-RSS ke logon ne Godhra mein 59 logon ko jalaya, bola Musalman ne jalaya…” [BJP-RSS men killed 59 in Godhra, said Muslims did it].

The Congress Party officially fully defended the findings of the Banerjee Committee and said that Godhra was an accident, with its national spokesmen Anand Sharma and Abhishek Singhvi in the forefront. They attacked BJP for questioning the findings of the Banerjee Committee. This is real defending of the heinous killers. Many Congress leaders went a step ahead, going to the extent of accusing BJP-RSS-VHP of killing the 59 Ramsewaks in Godhra, like Lalu. How would it seem if tomorrow a BJP Govt ordered a fake commission like Banerjee on Kathua which gave a report that the death of the 8 year old girl was an accident, and then BJP leaders campaigned saying: “Congress-Left ke logon ne Kathua mein 8 saal ki ladki ka balatkar aur katal kiya, bola Hinduon ne kattal kiya”? This is how bad the Left-liberal seculars are and were. None of them showed any disgust when Lalu did this on Godhra, many of them defended Banerjee Committee findings and they staunchly defend Lalu today. And Prashant Bhushan is no better. Naturally such defenders of heinous killers like Congress will condemn arrests of Maoist supporters when it they are done under BJP, never mind if their own government had arrested some of them earlier.

What else has Prashant Bhushan done? He was the lawyer of dismissed IPS Sanjiv Bhat in the Supreme Court in October 2015 when the SC condemned Bhat and exposed him for who he is. We will first see the misdeeds of Sanjiv Bhat, and then see the role of Prashant Bhushan in advocating for such a man, and a few more facts. These are given in detail in Chapter 12 of the book “Gujarat Riots: The True Story”.

Sanjiv Bhat claimed in 2011 that he was present in a crucial meeting held on 27 Feb 2002 late night at CM’s Bunglow Gandhinagar at 10:30 pm. The SC-appointed SIT debunked Sanjiv Bhat’s claim of being present in that 27 Feb meeting. On pages 30-31 of the SIT closure report, the SIT says that Sanjiv Bhat has also claimed to be present at Narendra Modi’s second meeting at his (Modi’s) residence (i.e. in Gandhinagar, away from Ahmedabad) on the morning of 28 February at 10:30 AM. The SIT report says on page 44:

“Further, on 28 February 2002, he remained at Ahmedabad till 10:57 hours and then returned to Ahmedabad at 20:56 hours. The claim of Sanjiv Bhat that he had attended a meeting at CM’s residence [in Gandhinagar] on 28-02-2002 at 1030 hours is proved to be false and incorrect. CM’s residence is at Gandhinagar, more than 25 KMs from Ahmedabad, and normally takes 30 to 45 minutes to reach there. His further claim that he had seen the late Ashok Bhat and Shri I K Jadeja, the then Ministers in the DGPs office at 11:00 hours on 28-02-2002, is also belied from the call detail records in as much as the location of the mobile phone of Shri Sanjiv Bhat was at Prerna Tower, Vastrapur-I, Ahmedabad, which happened to be at a distance of 1.5 Kms appropriately from his residence and Shri Bhat could not have reached Police Bhavan, Gandhinagar before 11:30 hrs by any stretch of imagination (page 44)…”

This shows that Sanjiv Bhat also wrongly claimed to have been present at the 28 February morning meeting at CM House Gandhinagar at 10:30 AM. Instead the mobile location is shown to be Ahmedabad at 10:57 AM, more than 25 km away from CM House, Gandhinagar. This fact of Sanjiv Bhat’s lie of being present in the 28 Feb 10:30 am morning meeting being exposed by his call records and SIT has been totally suppressed by the media, and Prashant Bhushan has advocated for this man Sanjiv Bhat. This shows what a fraud Prashant Bhushan is, he has never ever answered about this false claim of his client Sanjiv Bhat being debunked by his call records, and instead condemned Narendra Modi defending Sanjiv Bhat’s allegations on him!

The SIT report says on pages 423-428:

“Government of Gujarat vide its letter dated 22-6-2011 forwarded a set of emails exchanged between Shri Sanjiv Bhatt, DIG, Gujarat Police and certain individuals during April & May 2011. It was mentioned in the above letter that during the course of an inquiry instituted against Shri Sanjiv Bhatt, IPS by DG (Civil Defence), Gujarat regarding misuse of official resources, some revelations have been made having direct bearing on the cases monitored by SIT. The material forwarded by Govt. of Gujarat has been scrutinized and the salient features of the same are summarized as below:

(1) That top Congress leaders of Gujarat namely Shri Shaktisinh Gohil, Leader of Opposition in Gujarat Legislative Assembly and Shri Arjun Modhvadhia, President of the Gujarat Pradesh Congress Committee are in constant touch with Shri Sanjiv Bhatt, DIG. They are providing him “Packages”, certain materials and also legal assistance. Further, on 28-04-2011, Shri Sanjiv Bhatt exchanged mails with Shri Shaktisinh Gohil and the former gave points for arguments in Hon’ble Supreme Court matter, allegations to be made against the members of SIT and to establish that the burning of a coach of Sabarmati Express at Godhra Railway Station was not a conspiracy. From the emails, it appears that Shri Sanjiv Bhatt was holding personal meetings with senior Congress leaders as well. In one of the emails, he even mentions that he was “under exploited” by the lawyer representing Congress before Nanavati Commission of Inquiry.

(2) That Shri Sanjiv Bhatt had been persuading various NGOs and other interested groups to influence groups to influence the Ld. Amicus Curiae and the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India by using “Media Card” and “Pressure Groups”….

(10) That Shri Sanjiv Bhatt had been taking advice of Ms. Teesta Setalwad in connection with his evidence before Nanavati Commission of Inquiry. He had also been in touch with various journalists, NGOs and had been forwarding his representations, applications and other documents through email, whereas on the other side he had been claiming privilege that being an Intelligence Officer he was duty bound not to disclose anything unless, he was legally compelled to do so.

(11) That Shri Sanjiv Bhatt has been maintaining a close contact with Shri Rahul Sharma, DIG of Gujarat Police and had been getting his mobile phone calls analyzed with a view to ascertain his own movements of 27-02-2002. This shows that Bhatt does not recollect his movements on that day. He has also been trying to ascertain the movements of Late Haren Pandya, the then Minister of State for Revenue on 27-02-2002, with a view to introduce him as a participant of the meeting of 27-02-2002 held at CM’s residence, but could not do so, as Shri Rahul Sharma had informed him after the analysis that there was absolutely no question of Late Haren Pandya being at Gandhinagar on 27-02-2002 night.

From the study of emails, it appears that certain vested interests including Shri Sanjiv Bhatt, different NGOs and some political leaders were trying to use Hon’ble Supreme Court/SIT as a forum for settling their scores. This would also go to show that Shri Sanjiv Bhatt had been colluding with the persons with vested interests to see that some kind of charge-sheet is filed against Shri Narendra Modi and others.”

This makes things absolutely clear and also shows that many people were involved in this fraud, who knew that Sanjiv Bhatt was not present at the 27 February 2002 meeting, but far from bringing out the truth to the investigators, were helping in this false claim. Prashant Bhushan, being Sanjiv Bhat’s lawyer also knew all these things, but did not reveal it to the investigators, and supported this fraudulent & false claim to demonize and frame Narendra Modi in a false charge.

The late Haren Pandya of course, was not present in that meeting. The SIT report also says on page 56 that Haren Pandya’s mobile records show that he was in Ahmedabad on 27 Feb 2002 at 22:52 hours, meaning that it was impossible for him to attend the meeting in Gandhinagar at 10:30 PM on 27 Feb. This shows that Sanjiv Bhat was not present at all in the meeting, and he did not even know basic facts about the meeting. It is known since August 2002 that Haren Pandya was by no means present in the meeting. But Sanjiv Bhat did not even know this and hence first asked Rahul Sharma to find out if Haren Pandya could be introduced as a witness-a participant in that meeting.

Most importantly, this shows that Sanjiv Bhat was not present at all. If Sanjiv Bhat was present in the meeting, wouldn’t he know if Haren Pandya was present or not? Why would he need to ask Rahul Sharma to find the call details? Prashant Bhushan, as a lawyer of such a man Sanjiv Bhat would know all the facts of this case. They always say: “Never lie to your lawyer”. Despite this, he supported all such deeds of Sanjiv Bhat and tried to get Narendra Modi framed in this case. Prashant Bhushan and Sanjiv Bhat’s frauds are seen clearly here.

Now let us see some deeds of Arundhati Roy. She lied to a US audience in 2013 that the 59 Ram sewaks (including 25 women and 15 children) burnt to coal in Godhra by a mob of 2000 Muslims were ‘returning after demolition of Babri Masjid’ while in reality the Babri Mosque was demolished in 1992, and Godhra happened in 2002. She had of course, also lied that ‘No one knows who set fire to the train’ while at that time in 2013 there had already been a conviction of 31 Muslims by the trail court for it, and it has been clear like the sun since 27 Feb 2002 that it was a mob of Muslims who set fire to the train in the densely Muslim populated area of Signal Falia in Godhra.

In 2010, she wrote a three-part series in The Guardian comparing Maoists with Mahatma Gandhi. In 2010, even Congress MP Shashi Tharoor had criticized her for that description of Naxals.

We have quoted earlier the article of Arundhati Roy in Outlook dated 6 May 2002 when she gave a horrific description of ‘Sayeeda’ being killed. That same article had alleged that Ehsan’s Jafri’s daughters were stripped & burnt alive, which was proven incorrect with a statement issued by Jafri’s son, which was mentioned by the then BJP MP Balbir Punj in his counter article in Outlook. But the interesting part is here, after this lie was exposed.

After this, Arundhati Roy wrote “An Apology” in the Outlook dated 27th May, 2002. The full text of that apology titled “To the Jafri Family, An Apology” was:

“In a situation like the one that prevails in Gujarat, when the police are reluctant to register FIRs, when the administration is openly hostile to those trying to gather facts, and when the killings go on unabated—then panic, fear and rumour  play a pivotal  role. (Note how she blames others! And her charges are totally false too, police were by no means reluctant to file FIRs, nor was administration hostile to those gathering facts.) People who have disappeared are presumed dead, people who have been dismembered and burnt cannot be identified, and people who are distraught and traumatised are incoherent. So, even when those of us who write, try and use the most reliable sources, mistakes can happen. But in an atmosphere so charged with violence, grief and mistrust, it’s important to correct mistakes that are pointed out.

There is a factual error in my essay Democracy: Who’s She When She’s at Home? (6th May). In describing the brutal killing of Ehsan Jafri, I have said that his daughters had been killed along with their father. It has subsequently been pointed out to me that this is not correct. Eyewitness accounts say that Ehsan Jafri was killed along with his three brothers and two nephews. His daughters were not among the 10 women who were raped and killed in Chamanpura that day.

I apologise to the Jafri family for compounding their anguish. I’m truly sorry.

My information (mis-information, as it turned out) was cross-checked from two sources. Time magazine (11th March) in an article by Meenakshi Ganguly and Anthony Spaeth, and “Gujarat Carnage 2002: A Report to the Nation” by an independent fact-finding mission, which included K.S. Subrahmanyam, former I.G.P. Tripura, and S.P. Shukla, former Finance Secretary. I spoke to Mr.  Subrahmanyam about the error. He said his information at that time came from a senior police official. (What was the name of that official? Neither Subrahmanyam nor Arundhati Roy tell it!) This and other genuine errors in recounting the details of the violence in Gujarat in no way alter the substance of what journalists, fact-finding missions, or writers like myself are saying.”

We have covered this case in more detail in our book “Gujarat Riots: The True Story” as has S K Modi in his book “Godhra- The Missing Rage”. This apology is also false, since Roy claims that 10 women were raped and killed that day. In truth. no rapes had taken place in Chamanpura in this incident. After reading the then English newspapers in the first week of March 2002, one finds no mention of any rapes at all. These stories of rape started coming out in the middle of March 2002, after Time magazine concocted lies in its issue of 11th  March, 2002, copied by Arundhati Roy. It is a fact that this false story of Jafri’s daughters being raped was not invented by Roy, it was copied by her from others. She only ends up exposing the ‘sources’ she cited as liars, Time magazine as well as the fake report made by Subrahmanyam and S P Shukla, which also included Kamal Mitra Chenoy as among the makers. Neither Roy nor the Time correspondent can point out any proven rapes in this case. Roy also apologizes to the Jafri family, not to the BJP or Narendra Modi for defaming them by her incorrect claim. She should also have done that. And she should also have apologized to the country. Note how, while giving the apology, Roy makes sure that it is only “To the Jafri family”.

 Now let us see some more of her claims full of lies. Roy says, “His (Ehsan Jafri’s) phone calls to the Director-General of Police, the Police Commissioner, the Chief Secretary, the Additional Chief Secretary (Home) were ignored. The mobile police vans around his house did not intervene.”  The fact is that police outside his house not only intervened, they shot dead five rioters outside his house and saved the lives of 180 Muslims at a great risk to their own personal  life.  The Times of India also reported online that the police and fire brigade did their best to disperse rioters and nowhere did it allege any inaction on the part of police.

India Today weekly dated 18 March 2002 clearly admits that at least 5 people were shot dead by the police outside Jafri’s house. SIT report also says that on page 1.The police also saved the lives of some 200 Muslims, since 68 out of the 250 people inside the house died. Jafri’s widow Zakia Jafri also said in her statement to the Police, recorded under Section 161 of CrPC on 6 March 2002 that the police saved her and many others. It was impossible for the police to control the mob of around 10,000+ people and the mob had gone crazy after Jafri fired from his revolver on the crowd, which injured 15 Hindus and killed 1- as per the SIT report on page 1. But despite this the police saved 200 Muslims in this episode. And nowhere did The Times of India accuse the police of not doing anything. On the contrary, it said that the furious mob, gone crazy by Jafri firing on it, did not allow fire tenders to reach the house. We quote from Times of India online edition 28 Feb night at 9:41 PM “Meanwhile fire tenders which rushed to the spot (Chamanpura- Ehsan Jafri case) were turned back by the irate mob which disallowed the Ahmedabad Fire Brigade (AFB) personnel and the district police from rushing to rescue”. Thus the Police and the Fire Brigade ‘rushed to the rescue’ and did not indulge in neglect of duty.

And this Times of India report POSTED ONLINE at 2:34 PM of 28 February also says that police fired on the crowd injuring 6, who were taken to hospital where 3 were critical at that time, and ultimately 5 died. The SIT report said on page 1, that the police lathi-charged the mob, fired 124 rounds, and burst 134 tear gas shells at the spot on 28 February 2002, in which 4 Hindus were killed and 11 injured. Arundhati Roy conveniently ignored all these facts, and instead lied that ‘Police vans outside his house did not intervene’!

Also Roy says-“His phone calls to the Director-General of Police, the Police Commissioner, the Chief Secretary, the Additional Chief Secretary (Home) were ignored.” Roy’s lies are exposed since that day (28 February) the Chief Secretary G Subbarao was abroad, out of India on leave as mentioned in SIT closure report, page 448. He was recalled immediately after Godhra on 27 Feb and he returned on 1 March 2002. So how could Jafri have called the Chief Secretary for help on 28 Feb when he was out of India on leave that day?

The SIT has examined call records of the then Police Commissioner P C Pandey of 28 Feb 2002 and found that 302 calls had been made/received by him on that day, but they do not include any call by Ehsan Jafri, whose landline was the only phone in operation in the entire Housing complex on 28 Feb 2002. Thus Arundhati Roy’s claim that Jafri called the Police Commissioner (P C Pandey) is proved false from call records, mentioned by the SIT in its report.

Arundhati Roy is thus the Queen of fiction, alleging that Jafri made calls to important people which were ignored, when in reality Jafri made no calls to them. She has never given any apology for these fictitious claims (only given a fake apology on a false claim of Jafri’s daughters being raped, and made sure it was given only ‘To the Jafri family’). And her lawyer was Prashant Bhushan! Any wonder then that these two are demanding action against Police for arresting Maoist supporters? This is blatant interference in the working of Police, and support to alleged violators of law.

If the arrested activists are innocent, they will be acquitted by court. But how will Roy and Bhushan allow law to take its own course, when they WANT to demonize Narendra Modi and BJP? They will already proclaim them as innocent, hold the police as guilty, and ignore inconvenient facts such as the one that many of these 5 had been arrested earlier during the UPA time on similar charges!

Why one God

0

God is one, we are often told, we may call them by different names but ultimately it’s supposed to be One. This positioning to confirm to the sensibilities of a monotheistic worldview has over the course of past centuries slowly come to take the default position at a superficial level in the minds of most thinking, accommodating and believing individuals, monotheists or otherwise. It may have to do with dominating narratives of monotheistic civilizations but does that make it most sensible? Why, if any, constraints should we apply on the number(s) of Gods out there?

It is not as if limiting the number to One somehow makes the whole thought any more reasonable than say keeping it at 1 million. In fact, if the best form of governance is a democracy, why would you think that the Universe is a dictatorship? If we look deeper, monotheism is in fact a progression towards atheism, for example, Christianity and Islam which came to replace Roman and Arab paganism, did so by denying all other Gods worshiped in those populations and restricting the existence to only one, a logical continuation of this arbitrary denial would be no God at all.

What a lot of practicing Hindus follow in India, barring some who subscribe to the monism of Advaitavad or such, or in many cases even them, is a form of Polycentric Polytheism (It’s funny that some new age spiritualists look down upon Murti Pooja, while the doyen of Advaita – Adi Shankara – himself asked people to build more temples, worship more and wrote beautiful poems for many Gods!).

There are innumerable Gods, but a devotee chooses the one he/she relates to while not denying the existence of other Gods. Which means that a Shaivite for example, would consider Shiva as the Supreme being per his belief, but still won’t deny the existence of Vishnu. He may even bow down to Vishnu but would be chanting Om Namah Shivaay in his head!

This kind of approach is extremely inclusive, because, for a Hindu dharmic, other Gods, even from monotheistic traditions become a part of the pantheon, or are atleast acknowledged as valid, and they do so without making a claim to exclusivity.

Flawed escape clauses of social media

0

Social media have extended us the incredible platform to share our thoughts with the society at large and made the impossibility of getting connected or at least earning the attention of various administrative authorities, including the Ministers and the Ministries, possible.

However, this supercalifragilisticexpialidocious platform too is not sacrosanct in reality. In the recent past, the donnybrook that have erupted on Twitter over the Indian EAM’s decision to issue passports in favour of a particular couple, whether interfaith or of the similar religious belief is immaterial to me as a rational commoner, distinctly raised some pertinent questions from the wiser citizenry, to which both the EAM and the concerned Ministry maintained dead silence. The miniscule abusers though were promptly responded with much more weightage of online polling.

Such social networking platforms use certain jargons, taken from the English words that have entirely different meanings in its regular usage throughout eons of civilization.

Twitter is generously indulgent towards usage of jargons as Troll and has officially validated the usage of the word “Follower” with any Twitter account.

A. Definition of Troll in English language:

Troll, a noun, means in folklore an ugly cave-dwelling creature depicted as either a giant or a dwarf.

On Twitter it has urbanised misperception of someone who leaves an intentionally annoying message on the internet, in order to get attention or cause trouble.

OR

A message that someone leaves on the internet that is intended to annoy people.

B. Definition of Follower in English language :

Follower, a noun, means a person who supports and admires a particular person or set of ideas.

On Twitter Followers too are misperceived in its elucidation of eons, whereas it actually ranges from the harshest critics to the most ardent admirers, courtesy the programming logic of Twitter.

The scores of decent questioning lot thus became Trolls overnight from Followers, to the EAM of India that she in all probabilities expected to be her disciples. Such uncontaminated liberalism, goes without saying, disapproved abuses from Day One of the brouhaha, owing to its fundamental characteristics.

That the respectable EAM chose to respond to the abusive lot, rather than submitting a clarification to the questioning rest is entirely her prerogative, but to us, the law abiding citizenry, well equipped with its right to question, neither the Minister nor her Ministry was of any help by staying silent, which arguably raised doubts in favour of the procedural lapses.

Finally, it is about time that the social networking platforms like the Twitter or Facebook made it mandatory to verify every user for authenticity purpose, that would greatly discourage the abusers.

Conflict religion and foreign policy

0

BACKGROUND

In 1905, the British found the then Bengal presidency in India to be a very difficult province to manage and thus, ordered its ‘partition on the basis of religion’ to ease its administration. Although most Hindus vehemently opposed the division as a ‘divide and rule policy’, many Muslims supported it. The Muslim dominated the eastern regions of the Bengal presidency, which had comparatively lesser development and infrastructure than its western counterpart, dominated by the Hindu populace. However the political upheaval forced the British to rescind the partition of Bengal and finally the province was reunited in 1911.

THE SEQUEL – INDEPENDENT STATE FOR MUSLIMS IN SOUTH ASIA

However as the calendar drew closer to 1947, the communal separatists devised the “two-nation theory.” This “theory” claimed that the Muslims and the Hindus in the subcontinent constituted two very different and thus, irreconcilable nationalities. This “theory”, silent on how in spite of vast class, linguistic, ethnic, social, and cultural differences, opined that Muslims constitute a unified nation on a basis of “divine sanction.” The Bengali Muslim leaders also played a strong role in the Pakistan Movement, as much as the Punjabi and Sindhi Muslim leaders because they believed that ‘religion’ would be a unifying factor and language wouldn’t divide them. In addition to that, they also thought that Muslims would be safer under the rule of an Islam-oriented country, that is, Pakistan. All of this led to East Bengal becoming East Pakistan, politically a part of the sovereign country of Pakistan in 1947.

So, while ‘religion’ cut what was then India into two parts, it united a vast population separated by miles to form a single country – Pakistan. That way, ‘religion’ became a unifying yet divisive factor.

SIDELINED EVEN BEFORE BIRTH

The idea of a distinct state for the Indian Muslims was first proposed by Muhammed Iqbal; his scheme, “did not include Bengal”; it was confined to setting up a separate state for Indian Muslims in the North-West of the subcontinent. The name Pakistan, coined by Chaudhuri Rahmat Ali along with a group of students in Cambridge, was an acronym for Punjab, Afghania (Pathan), Kashmir, Sind, and istan (meaning country in Persian). Hence, Rahmat Ali’s scheme too failed to include the “lesser breed” of Bengali Muslims.

IDEOLOGICAL RUPTURES

Howbeit ‘religion’ could keep neither the people nor the politicians together. The once unifying factor – ‘religion’ – could not cement the fractures that followed in the erstwhile East Pakistan and West Pakistan. It was a single country ‘predominantly’ comprising of Muslims divided only by a huge, Hindu dominant country, India (geographically). But all was not well between the east and the west of the same country following the same religion. It wasn’t only India that had torn them apart (geographically) but what had diverged their paths was ethnicity. While West Pakistan had a strong predilection for the Urdu-influenced, fundamentally Islamic, and authoritarian government & social life, the East Pakistanis were ascendants of the Bengali culture which made them hold on so strongly to ‘their’ language, culture, and ideas, all of which embodied within them the core principles of freedom, secularism, and democracy. In stark contrast to its western counterpart, the eastern side had a more lenient approach to its minorities and sought to maintain ‘reasonably’ harmonious relations with its immediate and enormous neighbor – India.

THE POWER STRUGGLE

The areas that constituted Pakistan in 1947 were Bengal, Punjab, Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (then North-West Frontier Province or ‘NWFP’). The people who were handed over the reigns of the new country, Pakistan, on August 14 1947, were tasked with working out a system which allowed all the above-mentioned entities to coexist peacefully and prosper together. But when they sat down to figure out this formula for an equal distribution of power, every option they considered led to the same concern: the Bengalis were more in number than all the rest put together, and under a democracy, nothing could bar them from getting a majority share in the new state. Now that did not sit well (at all) with the infant country’s larger, grander designs of spearheading a new Islamic renaissance and superimposing ‘West Pakistani’ values across the length and breadth of ‘Pakistan’.

THE CLASH OF LANGUAGES

As one of the very first policies of the government of Pakistan, the Muslim League decided to make Urdu the sole state language of Pakistan though only 3 per cent of the population of Pakistan spoke Urdu but over 56 per cent spoke Bangla (or Bengali). Since Urdu was the language of the dominant class in West Pakistan and hence the language of upper echelons of the Muslim League leadership, the ruling party decided that Urdu was to be the sole state language of Pakistan. The explanation provided by the Pakistani ruling elite was that, since Urdu had more similarity with Arabic and Persian, it was a more “Islamic” language and since Bangla was derived from pre-existing Indian languages, primarily Sanskrit, it was a “Hindu” language.

THE IMPASSE

This was the first blow, post independence, to the Bengalis for whom Urdu was an alien and unrelated language. Thus, the Bengali intelligentsia and political leadership proposed that both Urdu and Bangla be declared as the state languages. Province-wide strike was held to protest the central government’s chauvinist policy of rejecting the language of the majority of the people as unfit to be a state language. On 21 February, 1952, university students started a procession and the police, under the direction of the West Pakistan Government, opened fire on them. This took a huge toll on the lives of many students and further agitated the people of East Pakistan. This incident also made it implicit that West Pakistan will remain unsympathetic towards the Bengali people, their language & culture, refrain from treating them as equals, and if need be then, won’t give a second thought to the idea of massacre in East Pakistan in its quest to retain a firm grip over that “patch of land”.

“THE TISSUE PAPER LAND”

The Pakistani ruling elite was more interested in the development of provinces of West Pakistan, though the majority of the country’s population lived in East Pakistan. This became crystal clear when West Pakistan efficiently ‘used’  the revenue earned by selling the East Pakistan’s crops to develop West Pakistan while no tangible sign of development came to sight in East Pakistan. If facts are to be believed then, in/around the year 1951, the total expenditure on the development projects of Pakistan was Rs. 1,126 million, out of which only Rs. 28 million was for East Pakistan. Hence, it is understandable why the Bengalis felt being ‘exploited’ (like a tissue paper!).

OFFICIALLY “PAKISTANIS V/S BENGALIS”

But rifts began to show glaringly only after the elections in 1970, which played a key role in polarizing the already geographically divided country. West Pakistan chose Zulfikar Ali Bhutto as Prime Minister, but the teeming population of East Pakistan voted almost unanimously for the Awami League under Mujibur Rahman. The Awami League, thus, acquired majority in the Parliamentary Elections of 1970, but the military dictator of Pakistan did not handover the power to the Awami League. When talks between the two leaders broke down, Bhutto gambled on sending in troops and jailing the secessionists. The West Pakistani rulers kept no stone unturned to oppress and suppress the political leaders of East Pakistan. For example, Sheikh Mujib, the leader of the Awami League, was sent to jail for more than 18 times on false charges. Political killings became very regular events. Official butchery and bloodbaths looked like common scenes then. This elicited the boiling point in East Pakistan.

Hence, on 25 March, 1971, the West Pakistani Government ordered “Operation Searchlight”. Operation Searchlight was a planned military killing carried out by the Pakistani Army to suppress the Bengali nationalist movement in East Pakistan during the liberation war of 1971. The Awami League leader, Mujib-ur Rahman, was arrested at night & was taken to West Pakistan. The Army then started indiscriminate killing in all of East Pakistan. The heaviest attack was on Dhaka where they killed at least 7000 students, faculty and staff overnight. Within a week at least 30,000 people were killed and half of the population fled Dhaka. Half of the Chittagong population was brutally raped, shot, and murdered. The killings continued for the next 9 months until December. This flooded India with some 10,000,000 refugees, thus, provoking Indian intervention.

INDIA-BANGLADESH

Since India as a nation has always emphasised humanity and compassion in all of its policies and actions, it did not surprise many when India, instead of being indifferent or acquiescent, took a ‘very firm’ stand ‘for’ Bangladesh in the Liberation War of 1971. Showing its intense contempt for the Pakistani Army led ghastly genocide and mass-rapes of Bangladeshi citizens, prioritising its sensitivity towards the plights of the Bangladeshis, India decided to confront the Pakistani Army and thus, launched its own army on the land of Bangladesh to protect the Bangladeshi citizens from the unbearable atrocities, and hence, successfully grabbed independence for Bangladesh. India, thus,  became the first country to recognize Bangladesh as a separate and independent state, and established diplomatic relations with the country immediately after its independence in December 1971. Hence, ‘religion’ (India being Hindu-dominant and Bangladesh being Muslim-majority) did not divide hearts this time, rather withstanding all differences in faiths and deities, India extended a supporting hand to the then ailing Bangladesh, which the latter, till this date, appreciates. But what is even more astounding is how the issue of ‘religion’ which became the major faultline and the most powerful ‘push factor’ for the 1947 India-Pakistan division could not, for long, keep the country of Pakistan ‘undivided’ and at the same time, did not discourage India from helping its neighbor, Bangladesh.

As per a report published by the Ministry of External Affairs of India, at present, both countries, India and Bangladesh, share 54 rivers, out of which, a treaty is already in existence for sharing of the Ganges water and both sides are working for early finalisation of agreements for sharing of water of other common rivers. Both countries are also cooperating in the conservation of the entire Sunderbans ecosystem, which is a common biodiversity heritage. Bangladesh is an important trading partner for India. The two-way trade in 2012-2013 was US $ 5.34 billion with India’s exports to Bangladesh accounting for US $ 4.776 billion and imports US $ 0.564 million with the duty free access given by India to Bangladesh for all items except 25. Two border haats are already operational with a few more on the anvil along the India-Bangladesh border. Investment by Indian companies (Airtel, CEAT, Marico etc.) in Bangladesh continues to grow with the signing of bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection agreement. India and Bangladesh have also established inter-grid connectivity for the flow of bulk power from India to Bangladesh. India has always stood by Bangladesh in its hour of need with aid and economic assistance to help it cope with natural disasters like floods.

In 2016, India boycotted the 19th SAARC summit in Islamabad, alleging Pakistan’s involvement in the 2016 Uri terror attacks in India. And Bangladesh was among the regional states who pulled out of the same summit, setting forth its loud and clear support ‘for’ India ‘against’ Pakistan. The Bangladeshi Foreign Ministry further conveyed to the SAARC Chair that Pakistan’s increasing interference in Bangladesh’s domestic affairs is inimical to the interest of Bangladesh and under such circumstances, it is not possible to participate in the summit at Islamabad. This finally led to the summit not happening at all that year. Mark that the conflict was between a Hindu-dominant nation and a Muslim-dominant nation but Bangladesh, another Muslim-dominant nation, chose to side with the former and not the latter.

According to a report published in The Economic Times, Bangladesh, in May 2018, advocated reforms in the Organisation of Islamic Conference or OIC, inferring entry of countries with large Muslim populations like India as observers in the grouping. Bangladesh Foreign Minister AH Mahmud Ali stated – “A number of countries – not OIC members, have large number of Muslims as their citizens. The Muslims may be minority in those countries, but in terms of number – they often exceed the total population of many OIC member countries. There is a need to build bridges with those non-OIC countries, so that a large number of Muslim populations do not remain untouched by the good work of OIC. That is why, reforms and restructuring is critical for OIC”, indicating entry of India as OIC observer.

So, did religious difference stop India from being ‘a friend in need is a friend indeed’ to Bangladesh and vice-versa? NO.

PAKISTAN-BANGLADESH

By 1974 it was apparent that the new nation, Bangladesh, would stand on its own, and thus, Pakistan recognized Bangladesh. Diplomatic relations were established in January 1976, followed by the re-establishment of communication and transportation links later in the year. After the war, Bangladesh also claimed that it deserved a share of the US$4 billion worth of pre-independence exchange, bank credit, and movable assets protected in West Pakistan during the war. In a 1975 agreement, Bangladesh accepted half of Pakistan’s pre-1971 external debt, but asset sharing issues remained unresolved.

But the bilateral relationship between Pakistan and Bangladesh is ‘still’ experiencing a deep freeze. The Awami League-led government in Dhaka is still seeking to resuscitate the ghosts of 1971, with Islamabad replying in a similar tone.  Even in 2017, the ties are far from cordial. The Pakistani delegation, in April 2017, decided to boycott a meeting of the Inter-Parliamentary Union that kicked off in Dhaka. The Pakistani diplomats and foreign ministry officials said that the situation was “not conducive” for Pakistani lawmakers to participate in the moot. Moreover, the Bangladesh Cricket Board has also turned down its Pakistani counterpart’s invitation to tour the latter’s country citing “inadequate” security arrangements. And on March 25, Dhaka observed ‘genocide day’ to mark the tragic events of 1971.

Also, it has been reported that Bangladesh will apparently write to the UN to observe every March 25 as ‘World Genocide Day’, which emboldens the fact that the Bangladeshis haven’t yet forgotten the 1971 nightmare, healed the bruises inflicted on ‘their honor’ by the Pakistani Army, and thus, are in no mood to shake hands with Pakistan without a proper apology tendered by the latter, appeasing their hurt sentiments and mourning the loss of their fathers and forefathers.  Pro-vice chancellor of Jahangir Nagar University, Farhad Hossain, has said that, “Pakistan knows it will have to pay a large sum in compensation as per international standards if it apologises. Once a formal apology is made, Pakistan would be legally bound to accept all that Bangladesh might claim as a victim – something that the Pakistani government is reluctant to do, and hence, no official apology yet”.

RELIGION – A TOSS OF COIN

Although belonging to the ‘same’ sect of the ‘same’ religion, erstwhile West Pakistan treated former East Pakistan as an enemy ‘foreign’ state to be injured and ripped till the latter bit the dust. Contrary to that, India moved past ‘religious’ differences and the bitter border disputes of the past to help Bangladesh breathe a sigh of relief and independence. ‘Conflict’ occurred in 1947 due to ‘religion’ but was resolved on the basis of ‘religion’ but ‘religion’ could barely glue the two regions together for long. ‘Conflict’ occurred again in 1971. This time ‘religion’ deterred neither Pakistan from being a foe nor India from being a friend. And the contemporary foreign policies of all the 3 nations (as discussed above) towards each other show almost zero consideration of ‘religion’.

Therefore, conflicts may arise due to the independent of religion but the foreign policy of a nation, located in an area as culturally and linguistically diverse as South Asia, is more influenced by ‘national, economic, and strategic interests’ than by ‘communal sycophancy’.

Is MK Alagiri the hope and future of Tamil Nadu?

0

On careful reading of the article that appeared in ABC Radio Canberra dated January 3 2017 under the title “Birth order: how your position in the family influence your personality” is quite scientific, meaningful and logical and from the article we can easily conclude that Mr. MK Alagiri is likely to have greater number of leadership qualities and styles of Kalaignar than his younger sibling. From that sense those followers of DMK should find Alagiri to be the true heir to the throne of Kalaignar’s legacy.

Experts in psychology has clearly affirms that the personality, behaviour and view of the world of people are modified and influenced by their position in the family.

The eldest children are often high achievers and leaders and who know how to control and boss and are likely to take greater responsibility and challenges. The eldest sibling in general would always consult everyone and are usually perfectionists and also likely to reflect the true character of their father.

Michael Grose, the parenting expert and author has said that birth order indeed account for the differences between kids within families. Further he wondered “most parents sometimes throw their hands up in the air wondering why their first and their second are so different”.

“They may be the same gender, born two years apart, have the same educational experience yet they’re as different as chalk and cheese.

“That’s where birth order comes in.”

Reason for the above difference is due to the differences in parenting. “Parents will raise their firstborns quite differently to a later born child, that’s largely due to focus and experience,” Mr Grose said.

If we reflect the above psychological aspect of children’s behaviour one can easily conclude that Mr. MK Alagiri’s stature will be more equal to Kalaignar than his younger sibling.

MK Alagiri is a true listener, speaks less, observes things patiently, a good organizer and a person who makes difference through his actions than rhetoric. The point to be analysed is not about how long he was associated with Kalaignar in politics but how many qualities and leadership elements of Kalaignar by default he possess over his younger sibling.

In real sense, the elder one is relatively more tolerant, patient, accommodative, caring, protective and responsible.   On the other hand, in general, the younger one will be dominating, arrogant, demanding, less responsible, impatient etc. This difference every one of us can easily cross check within our family.

From the mythological period till the county is being ruled by kings, the elder son is chosen as the next king purely because the elder son will be emotionally more mature than the younger one. Even if the age difference between them is less than 2 years.

The peace march of MK Alagiri in Chennai on September 5 2018 was a grand success. His peace march was indeed peaceful and he did not charge it politically definitely due to his exceptional maturity and leadership quality over his younger sibling.

People assumed that his peace march would be a flop show and at best he may have some small support base in down south of Tamil Nadu. But he proved all those critics wrong.

People are looking for an alternative to AIADMK and DMK. People are yawning for change. It looks like Mr. MK Alagiri can be the real change broker in Tamil Nadu politics.

For the betterment of Tamil Nadu if he align with BJP, Rajni Kanth and other political parties that are wanting to change the fortune of Tamil Nadu, certainly we can have a new ‘King’ out of Mr. MK Alagiri.

A very moderate, calm and a wise leader like Mr. MK Alagir is needed to lead the state and considering his experience and stature being moulded by Kalaignar, people should chose Mr. Alagiri over his brother.

Alagiri has lots to offer to the state from the shadow of late Kalaignar, hope the state will support such leader in near future.

Umbrella coalition between BJP and Alagiri will certainly go well for the state.

The ticking time bomb; population

0

India sits on a literal Population Time Bomb which is ticking away at an alarming rate to the extent that it has the potential to become the most insidious threat to the country. It’s the sheer numbers which constitute this threat, at the last count i.e., 2011 Census pegged India at 1.21 Billion and ticking.

The rate of growth will have added another 200 million by the time we get down to count the numbers again in 2021. Many economists and social entrepreneurs have welcomed these numbers as force multiplier for the impending Economic boom with the Youth comprising over 50% of the population. A study from China says that only 8.3% of the Indian population will be over 70 years of age or beyond the age of productivity in 2030 while China will be burdened by a corresponding figure of 37%. This may sound music to certain ears but the fact that India is waiting for the Population Time Bomb to explode is a scenario which cannot be anything but a disaster in waiting. The economic dividend is how the industry which believes in exploitative conditions as suitable for its activity sees the population growth but its darker side far outweighs the development paradigm being propagated by the enthusiasts.

An exploding population needs resources to live or even better, survive. India with just 2.4% of world’s surface area is home to world’s 17.3% population! This one fact alone negates the so called economic dividend being propagated by the votaries of population growth.

The crunch of resources is enough to derail any story leave alone a story which is not even half as good as it looks. Agriculture production is almost at its peak, with tweaking a little higher produce, will India be able to provide even the basic needs of an exploding population?

Food security will be an important factor, if the basic needs like Power and Housing are satisfied by the govts, but in the longer run, will it be enough to cater for the future population growth at the rate which it is growing

Urbanisation is a global phenomenon, while 37.2% of India’s population presently lives in cities and towns, there’s going to be an increasing trend of populations moving to urban conglomerates in very near future. Are we equipped to be able to cater for the basic needs of this population?

The urban infrastructure is literally crumbling around the country, unable to cope up the pressure of migration into cities.

Most metros and almost all cities are cesspools of filth and garbage, the Swach Bharat Abhigyan notwithstanding. The civic authorities have failed to provide basic sanitation and hygiene to its toiling masses. The picture of neglect in urban areas in itself is such a damning story of Urbanisation. But, not one political party or any politician of any hue has raised the issue of unbridled population growth in the country. It’s a sad state of affairs when a problem staring at you is ignored at the peril of being devoured by it if not checked is the pitfalls of a democracy without accountability.

Democracy is about the People, their development as human beings, the furtherance of their economic, cultural, social and educational goals. It’s not just about votes.

There’s this constant issue of religious demographics in India as a threat to the core of India as a Nation State, though there are many who are averse to the politics of the Nation State Of India. However, the figures of change in religious demographics are revealing in themselves.

In 1951, Hindus constituted 85% of the total population, since then it has been on the slide. So much so that the latest Census Of 2011 shows Hindus as 78% of the population. There’s a coresponding increase in population of Muslims in India from 9.8% to 14.3%. It is attributed to levels of illiteracy and the dogmas of Islam. But, it’s a fact that Hindus have put a check on population by adopting birth control measures and following family planning schemes, the Muslims in India have largely ignored similar measures by design and default. It’s again attributed to both religious orthodoxy and ignorance of measures, which is though hard to believe as Muslims have 100% enrollment for govt welfare schemes.

It’s this population growth which is also discussed as a problem in waiting. Population conspiracy theorists have also pointed out that though the Christian population is about 2.3% of the total, in effect, Christians are much more, coming to about 6% of the total population.

The terms crypto Christians and pseudo Christians are being used to denote those who are Christians in effect, but carry with their Hindu names as conversion may lead to revoking of SC/ST benefits. Vast tracts of TN, Andhra Pradesh, Odisha are Christians but remain professedly Hindu to gain benefits of SC/ST schemes.

The increase in population of Muslims and Christians in India vis a vis Hindus has created a conundrum of conflicting loyalties. The Muslims in India look towards their spiritual home to west in Mecca, while being told to follow the purest form of Islam as was followed by the prophet himself. The conflict of ideas emanating from the new Wahhabi stream of thought being propagated by Saudis through Petro Dollar is directly against the syncretism of Sub continental Islam. Wahhabism is the new vehicle of radical Islamic thought running a blood feud against all and sundry, from co religionists Shias, Ahmediyas to Hindus, to Buddhists and Christians.

It has infiltrated into every denomination of Mosques in India. Kerala, parts of TN, Karnataka in South, UP, Bihar, Bengal in North and East are hotbeds of Wahhabi radicalism.

Population theorists are also worried about the Papal powers of Vatican and the control of Pope over Catholic Church in India. The fact that the important posts of clergy are appointed by the Pope is an infringement of powers of a Sovereign Nation. India is a proud democracy with unenviable record of safeguarding rights of all minorities irrespective of their numbers. The most vibrant example is the Parsis, who are less than one lakh but have assimilated themselves wonderfully with no external links of religion or politics.

It is another form of threat when two major religions in a country are governed by extra territorial powers. The fact that both Islam and Christianity have their ideological homes in the Middle East Desert and are constantly preying on the Hindu population has the potential to break up the Country.

Population is not merely an economic problem, it encompasses issues which can derail the entire country if it is ignored. Hope that some politician will have the guts to formulate a population policy which is pragmatic and feasible.

Maharshi (Guru/Teachers) of our Bharatvarsha whose wisdom shaped the modern world

0

Teacher-Chanakya-who-shaped-our-World-Blog-Banner-HBR-PatelAcharya Chanakya Image Source

“A Teacher is never an ordinary person. Construction and destruction can be produced in his lap.” – Acharya Chanakya.

This quote aptly describes the role of Teachers in our society. With their Thoughts, they can influence many to a constructive path or else with some biased teaching they can lead an entire generation on the path of destruction.

Bharatvarsha was, is and will be blessed by many intellectual and pious soul, who choose to share their wisdom via teaching. They contributed to the development of this nation with their noble efforts. Be it a simple ‘Zero’ or huge task of splitting Vedas into four parts. They contributed in every aspect of life, right from Astronomy to Nuclear Physics.

Today, we shall remember those noble Teachers/Gurus who somehow shaped the world that we reside:

1. Maharshi Ved Vyas.

Maharshi Ved Vyas Image Source

The Compiler of the Mahabharat. One of the Seven Immortals (Chiranjeevi). The scholar who classified Vedas into the Rigveda, the Yajurveda, the Samaveda and the Atharvaveda. Like Teacher’s Day is celebrated in remembrance to Dr. Sarvepalli RadhaKrishanan, Guru Purnima is dedicated to the contribution of Maharshi Ved Vyas.

2. Maharshi Panini

Maharishi-Teachers-Panini-HBR-Patel

Maharshi Panini Image Source

The Scholar who scribed the Vyakarana(Grammar) for Sanskrit. His treatise on Sanskrit Grammar, Ashtadhyavi is the foundational text for Vyakaran branch of Vedanga. His work has influenced many modern Linguistics. The work of Maharshi Panini has made Sanskrit the preeminent Indian language of learning and literature for two millennia.

3. Maharshi Aryabhata

Maharishi-Teachers--Aryabhata-HBR-Patel

Maharshi Aryabhata Image Source

Mathematician and Astronomer. His contribution in the form of a treatise on Mathematics & Astronomy still guides the modern world. One of such work is Aryabhatiya covers arithmetic, algebra, plane trigonometry, spherical trigonometry, continued fractions, quadratic equations, sums-of-power series, and a table of sines. Aryabhata estimated the value of ‘pie’. He insisted that earth rotates around its Axis and Sky does’t rotate around Earth, like many at that time believed. To honor his contribution in the field of Astronomy, Indian Government named its first satellite as Aryabhata.

4. Maharshi Sushruta

Maharishi-Teachers-Sushruta-HBR-Patel

Maharshi Sushruta Image Source

Known as ‘Father of Surgery’, Maharshi Sushruta was the author of Suśruta-saṃhitā. Many experts consider this book as one of the important surviving ancient treatises on medicine. Suśruta-saṃhitā is considered foundational text of Ayurveda. He was the first person to describe Plastic Surgery. Detailed Description of Surgery Procedure, Surgical Instruments, and Type of Illness in the Human Body, highlights the wisdom of our ancient sages.

5. Maharshi Kanada

Maharishi-Teachers-Kanada-HBR-Patel

Maharshi Kanada Image Source

The Sage, Scientist, and Philosopher who blended science, philosophy, and religion via his work in Vaisheshika Sutra. He proposed Anu(Atom) as an indestructible particle of matter and pioneered Atomic Theory. He founded Vaishesika, one of the six major schools of Vedi Philosophy of our Bharatvarsha. His work in a large measure agreed with the discoveries of modern physics.

There are many other Sages/Teachers whose contribution are noteworthy. Feel free to mention them in the comments.

This Article was Originally Published on HBR Patel

Farmers, Procurement and Agripreneurship in India

Lal Bahadur Shastri once famously proclaimed, “Jai Jawan, Jai Kisan”. Today, even as we hold our Jawan, our soldiers in high esteem, the conditions of the farmer in India is deplorable. Agriculture may today contribute to just 15.5% of the GDP (as of 2017) as compared to 41.8% in 1960, but agriculture is the primary source of livelihood for about 58% of the Indian population. India is among the top 15 exporters of agricultural products in the world and the total agricultural exports from India stands at a whopping $38.21 billion in the fiscal year 2018. The Indian food and grocery market is the world’s sixth largest, while the Indian food processing industry accounts for 32% of the country’s total food market. As per the Union Budget (2018-19), Rs 57600 crore was allocated to the Agriculture Ministry. With such great figures, one would expect that agriculture must be prioritised and therefore doing quite well in most places in India.

Not quite.

There are serious systemic problems and lack of structural elements that would facilitate a more robust agriculture sector. Let us look at what these are with a look at the realities of the agriculture sector in India.

Realities of Agriculture in India

Food Grain Production:

During the 2017-18 crop year, rice and wheat production in the country is estimated at 111.52 million tonnes and 98.61 million tonnes respectively, as per third advance estimates, while food grain production is estimated at 279.51 million tonnes in the same period. India is also the second largest fruit producer in the world, while the production of horticulture crops is estimated at a record 307.16 million tonnes in 2017-18 as per second advance estimates. India is the largest producer, consumer and exporter of spices and their products, with spice-exports from India reaching $3.1 billion in 2017-18. Tea exports from India have reached a 36 year high of 240.68 million kilograms while coffee exports reached a record 3,95,000 tons in 2017-18. However major problems ranging from lack of support for farmers to lack of facilities, infrastructure and units for procurement and effective storage.

So how do we resolve these problems?

Let us start by looking more closely at the problem. Since most of the cultivable land India is farmed and yet the demand is every-increasing for food grains, raising productivity per unit of land is much needed. Water resources are limited and this limited supply of water is as much needed for industrial and urban needs as it is for irrigation. Hence, all measures to increase productivity need to be brought into place, including increasing yields, diversification to higher value crops, and developing value chains to reduce marketing costs. In today’s age, promoting new technologies and reforming agricultural research is key. Research into best agricultural practices has declined due to acute under-funding of infrastructure and operations, or broad access to state-of-the-art technologies that are needed to succeed in this respect. There is also the problem that there is little connection between research and extension/dissemination of this to the stakeholders (particularly the farmers), or between these services and the private sector, thereby creating a lack of dialogue between the two.

Due to the aforementioned problem with water supplies and high demand of agriculture on these, India also needs to improve the management of irrigation and drainage. Drip irrigation, piped conveyance, and better on-farm management of water are among the various ways  that this can be realised. Also, given the depleting water table, one must use water with discretion for sustained supplies for irrigation. Unfortunately, farmers still use excessive amounts, way beyond their need leading to wastage. Modernizing ways of getting water from underground sources and other water bodies, irrigation and drainage is needed along with including the farmers in a participatory model where their inputs are taken all along the way.

The elephant in the room still is procurement, which I will be discussing later in this article. Besides this and the primary, aforementioned points, adoption of food safety and quality assurance mechanisms is important. This includes Total Quality Management (TQM) that in turn includes Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) and Good Hygienic Practices (GHP) in the food processing industry. This is going in the direction of not only helping the farmer but also safeguarding and promoting a sustainable agriculture sector in its entirety. Unfortunately, arguably for political reasons, Indian policy has not been able to evolve from the idea “farmer well-being” to “agricultural household sustainability”. There is a certain conspicuous lack of long-term policy planning, which along with the welfare-oriented policy results in a periodic loan-waiver method that only perpetuates a poor credit culture in the primary sector and, hence, a fragile balance sheet for the state. This easy letting-be by convenient waivers is a quick solution for the short term but quite counterproductive in the long run. One, therefore, needs more comprehensive reforms.

This should start with a constitutional amendment that makes agriculture and water use a part of the concurrent list in the Constitution (currently agriculture, dairy, meat and fisheries are state subjects). This would provide a federal boost to states, with a primary emphasis laid on how to use water sources and resources effectively. This water project will not only focus on bringing more areas under irrigation in a sustainable manner but also focus on innovations and elements that will improve efficiency in agricultural practises and its use of resources such as with the use of sprinklers and drip irrigation. Also harsh though it may seem, misuse of ground water can only be checked with a pricing of the elements that used to extract the water such as the electricity, without giving state subsidies beyond a point. n addition, the water effectiveness emphasis should insist on agricultural power being priced to the farmer. And most importantly, there needs to be a strong political will to carry these measures out. As I will discuss later, it is due to the superficial MSP-based resolution of problems given by Indian governments that crops go waste and procurement becomes a huge issue.

Milk Production and Meat Production:

Milk production and meat production were estimated at 165.4 million tonnes and 7.4 million tonnes respectively in the fiscal year 2017. Even though milk production has been booming due to the White Revolution and Operation Flood, the milk processing has been lacking. Only 10% of all the milk produced is delivered to some 500 dairy plants that process 20 million litres per day. Even though today 80% milk production is done in unorganised and backyard farms, it is projected that in the next decade or so 40% milk production will come out of organised modes. One of the contributory factors behind this trend is the increased consumption of value added milk and milk products. This is facilitating the farmers and producers to fetch better realisation price of milk, which in turn makes the farmers more open to improve the nutritional optimisation of feed and fodder and this improves the milk production. This natural graduation of dairy farmers from unorganised to organised sector is happening in their minds due to the benefits therein.

However, there is a big lot of farmers in the unorganised sector who still feed their cattle unbalanced diets and it is them that one needs to educate and inform about the importance of proper diet for the animals with an emphasis on their Dry Matter Intake (DMI) to protein  to energy needs. For the semi-organized dairy-farmer, the issues of herd efficiency and maintaining a consistent milk production round the year can be addressed by proper transition management and management of reproduction efficiency. Even the organised sector has the problems of feed-to-income ratio and a proper supply of forage. This can be addressed by keeping good silos and facilities for storing and managing Total Mixed Rations (TMR) for cattle. There is also a problem of lack of fodder year long (with an estimation of a 65% deficit in fodder in 2025), which can only be resolved by cultivating high yield fodder crops. Not to forget, the forward integration with the market in terms of properly marketing the milk and finished milk products needs to be done. A very Indian phenomenon is the presence of a large unorganised sector of vendors and milkmen, who collect milk from local producers and sell the milk in both, urban and non-urban areas, which handles around 65-70% of the national milk production. In the organised dairy industry, the cooperative milk processors have a 60% market share while the private dairies process and sell only 20% of the milk collected as liquid milk and 80% for other dairy products with a focus on value-added products.

Meat production and poultry is a booming industry in India. In 2017, chicken production increased by 7%, reaching a whopping 4.5 million tons. According to the Indian Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries (DAHD), an estimated 2,38,00,00,000 chickens were slaughtered for their meat in 2016-17 in India. About 70% percent of this poultry production is controlled by large companies, which have slaughter facilities using huge amounts of water at every stage of production. This is however nothing compared to the meat industry of other countries. Today, a third of fresh water resources are used directly or indirectly by the meat industry globally. According to a very interesting fact, if every country in the world were to follow the high meat consumption patterns of America, the world would have already run out of water in the year 2000! Water is used for producing the grain feed for chickens, besides their drinking and maintenance of their surroundings. Water is also used for killing and cleaning the birds and then processing their meat. Not to forget, poultry creates a huge amount of water pollution at different stages of production, so much so that water cannot be recycled, drunk or even used for crops, due to being full of antibiotics and pesticides. These two factors combined—the amount of water used and the amount of water polluted—create the high water footprint of poultry.

It is estimated that 5000-50000 units of chicken are butchered every week in India, varying in the various states of the country. The living conditions of these chicken are despicable and after allowing them to lay eggs six months after moving in for a year they are sent off to the butchers. These chicken are often injected with chemicals that limit their growth or ensure that no further development of their eggs can take place! The high demand for meat and poultry in the country is the primary reason for non-adherence to standards and good practises, besides the exorbitant pricing and resultant spending on everything from electricity to grains and water. As we saw previously, a significant section of the Indian population is in agriculture for a relatively small pie in the economy, and this overcrowding often leads people to animal husbandry. The government has incentivized this further with subsidies and exemption on excise duty for meat processing units. With a certain growing acceptance of eggs as vegetarian food, the government has also launched schemes to make them available in midday meal programs in schools to get rid of malnutrition, which further increases the demand for the industry.

Improvement in infrastructure to keep pace with increasing demand, better regulation of food processing standards by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), and a mandatory supervision to ensure that rules are adhered to, besides prevention of unhygenic conditions for animals are important steps that must be taken. You may ask as to what is the point of keeping hygenic conditions for animals if they are anyway going to be slaughtered.  A good illustration of the need can be had in the instance where healthcare workers had to kill tens of thousands of chickens in the last few years due to the spread of bird flu, which was due to unchecked hygiene standards. Standards have to be ensured to keep the demand high.

The current government has taken some good steps like the issuing of soil health cards to keep a tab on the `health’ of the soil. Designation of the agriculture ministry as the agriculture and farmers’ welfare ministry has brought to the fore the idea that keeping farmers’ welfare is important for agriculture progress. I would go a step further and include sustainable community/family interests as well, albeit for that a sizeable amount of dialogue will need to be done with the rural development ministry.  As per a Times of India article written by M.S. Swaminathan in August 2018, few of the major steps taken by the Modi government include

Both budgetary and non-budgetary resources have been allocated for promoting micro-irrigation through the Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana. Conservation and sustainable use of indigenous breeds of cattle is being encouraged through a Rashtriya Gokul Mission. The Prime Minister also inaugurated the first ever International Agrobiodiversity Congress.

Promotion of the electronic national agriculture market is helping bring together different agriculture markets. Likewise the creation of Gramin Agriculture Markets will provide scope for direct sales to consumers in both retail and bulk form. Notable in this context is also the introduction of the Agricultural Produce and Livestock Marketing Act, 2017 and Agricultural Produce and Livestock Contract Farming Services Act, 2018 supported by electronic Negotiable Warehouse Receipt system for increased institutional credit to the farm sector.

Also notable is the determination of MSP on the basis of NCF recommendations and assured procurement at MSP of more crops. Integration of protein rich pulses and nutri-rich millets into welfare programmes including PDS, mid-day meals and ICDS is important too.

Activities like apiculture, mushroom cultivation, bamboo production, agro-forestry, vermicomposting and agro-processing are being promoted to generate additional jobs and income for farm families. The prime minister has also suggested that we should develop methods by which farmers’ income can be doubled within five years. Plus several corpus funds are being set up to complete ongoing irrigation productions, modernise the infrastructure in dairy cooperatives, and strengthen the adoption of inland and marine aquaculture.

Above all, the recent announcement of a remunerative price based essentially on the recommendation of NCF is a very important step to ensure the economic viability of farming. To underline, government has ensured in its notification that from kharif 2018 onwards MSP of the notified crops would be minimum of 150% of the cost of production; it ranges from 150-200% for coarse cereals.

The MSP Bandwagon vs Procurement 

One of the most widely followed practise by governments is to make the Minimum Support Price (MSP) `fair’ for the farmers. The Union government constituted National Commission on Farmers (NCF) in 2004, which was headed M.S. Swaminathan. The NCF’s recommendations on the MSP are taken as reference points today when discussing this topic. The Commission’s recommendations were along these lines:

The Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP), gives three definitions of production costs: A2, A2+FL and C2.

A2 costs – It basically cover all paid-out expenses, both in cash and in kind, incurred by farmers on seeds, fertilisers, chemicals, hired labour, fuel, irrigation, etc.

A2+FL costs – It cover actual paid-out costs plus an imputed value of unpaid family labour.

C2 costs – These costs are more comprehensive, accounting for the rentals and interest forgone on owned land and fixed capital assets respectively, on top of A2+FL.

The M.S. Swaminathan Committee report had recommended a minimum support price of 50% profits above the cost of production classified as ‘C2’ by the CACP.

Increasing the MSP most directly helps the farmer. It is a good initiative and has helped a lot of farmers, but this is not enough. Increasing MSPs may look good most on manifestos for elections but for truly addressing the problems in the agriculture sector, one needs to have a more comprehensive approach, which includes a big emphasis on procurement and storage. Aided by a good monsoon season, India may have produced record foodgrain this time but the lack of storage is not going to help. Recently it came to the fore that the government of India has not been fully paying the Food Corporation of India (FCI) the cost to run the massive food-grain procurement, storage and distribution network, and that it owes FCI an amount of Rs 2,0,00,00,00,00,000, due to non-payment of dues for three years now!

To maintain the food procurement, distribution and supply, the Food Corporation of India (FCI) has been borrowing money from government’s National Small Saving Fund (NSSF). In 2016-17, FCI borrowed Rs 6,60,00,00,00,000 from NSSF at an interest of 8.8% as an emergency fund raising. Even though the godowns of FCI are brimming with grains after the bumper season, past instances of rotting stacks of food-grains in FCI godowns might become more frequent with such a huge foodgrain harvest. Without funds, how is the FCI supposed to maintain stocks? This has been a problem not only of this government but many governments before. As the government has increased the Minimum Support Price (MSP) of foodgrains, it is expected to increase procurement as well. And this is where the lack of fund could impact the most. Availability of wheat is more than rice and with the kharif season around the corner, the government needs to start thinking of what to do with the wheat (which is not exported usually, due to global low prices of wheat) before the rice stock comes in. These are just some nuances of a fairly chronic problem. In West Bengal, under the Trinamool Congress (TMC), the collapse of the state procurement infrastructure has led to widespread distress among farmers and even farmer suicides.

To address this, I would like to put forward a proposal that may invite a lot of debate and even criticism but which I feel is the only way to address the dismal state of this in a fairly quick, quality-assured and sustainable way: put a major portion of silage, procurement and storage in the hands of private-sector entities. The reason for advocating this is three-fold: more flexibility and freedom of negotiating of private-sector entities, albeit within the bounds of the law, which can help them tackle various kinds of problems on the trot; the second is more freedom to experiment and to adapt new techniques in a quicker way without excessive red-tapism; and lastly, the constant competition mode after a fixed time period in public-sector entities does not allow long-term relationships between procurers and suppliers while that is not a problem with private sector players, which leads to long, sustainable bonds and stable market chains.

The Food Corporations Act (FCA), Agripreneurs and Innovation

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) was enacted by the Indian Parliament under the Food Corporations Act on 10 December 1964. Its primary purpose is the purchase, storage, transportation, distribution and sale of food grains and other food items. It also seeks to safeguard the interests of farmers, maintain buffer stocks and make grains accessible at reasonable prices to the weaker and vulnerable sections of society through the Public Distribution System (PDS). The FCI was useful when there were food shortages but with the aforementioned excess, its roles is being questioned and potentially redefined. According to the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO), in the year 2012–13, only 13.5% paddy farmers were willing to sell their output to procurement agencies. A high-level committee that was constituted for the purposes of restructuring the FCI recommended, that the institution should hand over all procurement operations of rice, wheat and paddy to the states. It also suggested revisiting the minimum support price policy.

Even though the Minimum Support Price (MSP) of wheat and rice has been increased since 2004-05 but the Central Issue Price (CIP), the price at which the government sells foodgrains through the Public Distribution System (PDS) in ration shops, has not been revised since 2002, leading to a widening gap between the subsidy expenditures and earnings in the system. The food bill is estimated to be Rs 13,81,23,00,00,000 in the 2018-19 fiscal year as against the actual expenditure of Rs 10,49,01,00,00,000 crore in 2017-18. To reduce food bill, the government has introduced a policy of switching all the expenses on procurement and distribution of food-grains over to the Public Financial Management Statement (PFMS) platform as mandated by the Finance Ministry in August 2018. the government has also introduced a policy of usage charges for packing of paddy to further the cause of reducing the food bill.

The committee also suggested the gradual containerisation of the movement of grains to reduce losses in transit and have a faster turnaround time. It has also recommended that farmers be given direct cash subsidy so that spurious diversions of implements like urea can be prevented. Most importantly, the committee believes that

The new FCI should be a market-friendly agency for food management, with a primary focus on creating competition in every segment of foodgrain supply chain, from procurement to stocking to movement and finally distribution in TPDS, so that overall costs of the system are substantially reduced, leakages plugged, and through it serving farmers and consumers.

It also needs to prioritise the use of its grain management techniques in areas where farmers have often not been able to receive the minimum support prices. Above all—politically, economically and administratively — the FCI must look into getting rid of the occurrence of widespread hunger among the poor even with godowns brimming with grains. Recently, it has started to sell wheat in bulk to tackle the excess grain problem this year. Hopefully the poorest of the poor will be benefited from this and from future formulations of distribution of grains not only in times of crisis but also in normal times.

I would go a step further in seeking to promote agripreneurship (agricultural entrepreneurship) to make it a competitive space and to make infrastructure and capital available at various points in the value chain. This of course has to be regulated and cannot be uncontrolled, since then exploitation of the weaker sections in the rural hinterlands may be possible. Emphasis should also be given on how local solutions, businesses and ventures can resolve problems of an area. After all, they may best know what the best resolution for a problem in their locality would be. The best case, in example, is that of Africa and how agripreneurship is making inroads and good change in many parts of the continent. Successful supply chain development projects have reduced not only the transaction costs but also the institutional barriers that break encumbering  individual links in traditional distribution channels. They allow participants to achieve higher levels of service, products and solutions, and to capture substantial added value. This serves as a mean to achieve economic growth as well as for poverty alleviation.

Where on one hand one has a dairy farmer in Eastern Cape who use uses the computer programme for herd management and feeding he helped innovate and develop and that has helped him increase milk output 30% at the same cost, on the other hand, one has Agriprotein, a firm that turns fly larvae from food waste into a high-value protein feed for chicken, pigs and fish. However, one has to be cautious while considering agripreneurship as a solution: without proper capacity building, it may not be be sustainable. As the business grows, to keep the customers happy one needs to know the best possible ways to scale up for a particular product or solution in the sector. Thankfully, even there Africa is not behind. The recently started Young Innovators in Entrepreneurship and Leadership Development (YIELD) project seeks to build the capacity of agripreneurs. Africa was the cradle of humanity. I will not be surprising if they also give us the next stage in our evolution as a species and society, and it would be to India’s benefit to adopt the best solutions in this sector, including a sustainable agripreneurship model, albeit assessed and possibly customised for Indian realities and conditions. In India, in certain parts such as Rajasthan, the first such ventures have been coming up, including the agriventures under the ACABCS scheme.

A harmonious public-private partnership in agriculture and the primary sector is the only way the increasing pressures on this sector can be faced effectively without compromising on either the products nor the quality and effective timing of the distribution of these products. A sustainable model of agripreneurship that has ample training and support for capacity building and scalability can provide a robust model for sustainable agricultural practises as well as poverty alleviation.

I rest my views (and case) with this.

References:

[1] The Economic Survey 2016–17, Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA), Department of Commerce and Industry,

[2] Kumar, Ladapuram Srinivasa Sampath. “Agriculture in India.” Agriculture in India. (1963).

[3] Mackenna, James. Agriculture in India. Superntenent Government Printing Indian; Calcutta; India, 1915.

[4] Brown, Trent. Farmers, Subalterns, and Activists: Social Politics of Sustainable Agriculture in India. Cambridge University Press, 2018.

[5] Tripathi, Nimisha, et al. “Agroecology and sustainability of agriculture in India: An overview.” EC Agriculture 2.1 (2015): 241-248.

[6] Press releases and reports from Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, and Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare

[7] Praveen, K. V., et al. “Risks and adaptation strategies in rainfed agriculture in India: An analysis.” Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88.6 (2018): 958-963.

[8] Altieri, Miguel A. Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture. CRC Press, 2018.

[9] Report. `Agriculture in India: Information about Indian Agriculture & its Importance‘. Indian Brand Equity Foundation (2018).

[10] Report. `India: Issues and Priorities for Agriculture‘. World Bank (2012).

[11] Dugmore, Heather. `Africa well position to feed the world‘. Business Today, August 2018.

[12] Gatune, Julius. `Agripreneurship in Africa: The YIELD Approach‘. Blog, African Centre for Economic Transformation (ACET), January 2018.

[13] Bairwa, Shoji Lal, Saket Kushwaha, and Chandra Sen. “Problems faced by agripreneurs in starting and operating agriventures under ACABCS scheme in Rajasthan state.” Int. J. Agri. Sci. Res 5.2 (2015): 203-208.

[14] Singh, Rashmi, et al. “Success Factors for Enhancing Entrepreneurship among Rural Youth: A Study of Successful Agripreneurs.” Ecological Perspectives (2016): 875.

[15] Reports of CRISIL

Narendra Modi: More of an activist soul than a politician

0

The news of alleged plot to kill PM Modi by a group of activists made me think why the hell social activists want to kill one of their own? And What does it mean?

Let me begin with few staggering stats like 5 crores free LPG to BPL families in 4 years, 32 crores bank accounts of the Poor, electrification of all remaining villages of India in 1000 days, ODF near completion are few achievements Modi govt boast about. And If it’s true, it’s not possible unless this rouge Indian administrative system is pushed hard by a commander with a mind of an activist. A politician at PM post can’t achieve this mind blowing success but only a PM with a mind of a committed activist can. And Modi proved to be an activist PM.

Activism attracts many brilliant minds and it always will.

I have seen many sharp minds in IIT Kanpur getting attracted to social cause and activism. Somewhere this charms them as a perfect way to bring the change in society and a good investment of their talent. Few dare to dedicate their all and others like me, despite joining corporate world and spending our evenings in pubs, try to keep this flame burning either by working with some NGO or at our personal level. That’s the magnetic attraction of activism.

Why it’s very important for a society:

It’s important for three big reasons:

  1. People who are left behind for any reasons do get a chance to catch up with time.
  2. It Keeps a strict check on Power of Indian State and bring more transparency in our system.
  3. It adds some purpose to our lives and a sense of satisfaction for sure.

While working with a group of socially aware people in college, I too did fight for compensation for injured workers and went to villages to talk to kids and people to know what can be done for them. Here are few observations of mine-

  1. Village and darkness (no electricity) had romantic relationship and they mostly used to spend nights together barring few hours. And this was perfectly ‘normal’.
  2. Fumes coming out from almost every home and cow-dung cakes can be seen everywhere. LPG cylinders must have been a dream only.
  3. Cycling to village from campus (though very close) was through dirt, muddy roads and of course through lot of Naalas proudly blowing its fragrance .
  4. Bad School building, less efficient teachers and no proper toilets are few other beautiful features of the school.
  5. We had worst health care for the Poor.

I always used to think activists need power to fix this problem but then why the hell people at power don’t work with a mind of activist? All appear for civil services and for election to change the world and then mostly money and status fix them instead of they fixing our problems. In India, becoming IAS, IITian, Minister is considered as an achievement and none cares what they do after becoming something. Position fetches respect and not the work here.

And then Modi came in 2014 and as usual, I had no big expectations from him except same political Bhashans and promises and day to day work of a PM. But to my surprise, He proved to be an activist. An activist holding the command of the system. Wow 🙂

And Why I say so? Check out the list below-

Activism in providing Basic facilities to all

Electricity- Providing Electricity to remaining villages at very high speed is good but I won’t say it’s revolutionary. But providing electricity for 24X7 to all is a revolutionary idea and hope this gets implemented asap.

LPG Connections- The very idea of taking away subsidies from middle class and giving it to BPL family is mother of all activism and what a brilliant execution of this.

5 crore free LPG connections distributed to women beneficiaries belonging to BPL category, 8 months ahead of targeted time.

Activism for Financial inclusion

Banks at the door of the Poor.

Mudra loans- Funding the unfunded

  1. 8.7 cr people got total of 3.6 lakh cr loan
  2. Out of above, 76% are women
  3. All loans are provided with the authentication on Aadhaar so above data doesn’t has any duplication.

Activism in Health sector

Clean India- WHO lauds India’s commitment to accelerated coverage of safe sanitation services which, assuming 100% coverage is achieved by October 2019, could avert up to 300,000 deaths due to diarrheal disease and protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) since the country launched the Swachh Bharat Mission in 2014. ODF is one such brilliantly executed programme under clean india.

Low cost medicines- Under PMBJP, cost of medicines have come down heavily.

Modi Care-  Covering 10 crores family ( 40% of population ) under an insurance of 5L per annum is a huge deal. If this becomes a realty, Raman Magsay should come back on earth and give Modi the magsey award himself.

There are more works to do than done for sure but having an activist PM who asks system to deliver before time and ask for accountability is something huge and a real huge. Believe me, activists fight with local system to get these things for the poor and it takes time, energy, network. This PM can deliver and is delivering in no time for us.

Then what’s the need to buy grenade to eliminate such an activist when the activists community can make him a biggest asset to bring a desired change in different sectors OR are we more interested in keeping alive our job of activism than addressing the need of the poor ?

Even if you are a political opponent, dig up these claims and expose govt on these works.

Sadly, now its fight between #activism and #grenadeActivism as few educated prominent activists allegedly buying grenade to change the system and that change includes killing of an activist PM too. I just wish this turns out to be a false charge because activism, be it at ground or at a PM level, is the most fascinating idea and truly make the under privileged life more worthy to live.