Home Blog Page 606

Know your candidate – Kanhaiya Kumar

0

Candidate Name: Kanhaiya Kumar

Constituency: Begusarai, Bihar

On February 9th 2016, an event was to be organized in the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) to protest against the ‘extra judicial killing’ of Afzal Guru, the 2001 Parliament attack mastermind. February 9th was the date of Afzal Guru’s hanging. Some of the slogans that could be heard in the protest march were ‘Bharat tere tukde tukde honge, inshallah’ and ‘Kashmir ki azadi tak jung rahegi’. At the time this event was organized, the JNU Students’ Union President was one Kanhaiya Kumar, a student undertaking a PhD in African Studies in JNU.

Kanhaiya Kumar and his family members have all been proponents of the dreaded and violent Left ideology. Following the events in JNU, Kanhaiya was charged with sedition and criminal conspiracy. Kanhaiya later denied having raised any of these slogans, but the moot question to be asked is, why such an event was organized in the first place to make martyrs out of Islamic terror masterminds. A disciplinary committee organized by the vice chancellor of JNU stated that the organizers had circumvented the permission process for the event. When Kanhaiya was subsequently granted interim bail by the Delhi High Court, Justice Prathibha Rani made a scathing attack on Kanhaiya and gang mentioning that such speeches are against the country and cannot be termed free speech. She characterized such speeches as a form of infection, which can either be cured or would need amputation.

Following the ruckus over the Afzal Guru event, Kanhaiya made a speech in JNU campus where, on expected lines, he spew venom on the RSS, Hindutva, Manuvaad, ABVP and of course on PM Modi and the BJP. The word azadi was twisted to indicate that he did not want freedom of Kashmir from India, but freedom within India from all the supposedly divisive and communal forces. Needless to say, this speech won rave reviews from our Hindu-hating, Modi-hating liberals. Arvind Kejriwal, who rose to fame by being part of anti-corruption movements and is now literally pleading with the epitome of corruption for an alliance, termed the speech ‘inspiring’.

Congress spokesperson Sanjay Jha, who never gets tired of making a fool out of himself daily on television, compared Kanhaiya with Che Guevera and mentioned that he symbolized a new, young and repressible India. Rana Ayyub, the ‘activist’ who plays the Muslim victim card at the drop of a hat and doesn’t waste a second in getting employees in Islamic countries sacked for only speaking the bitter truth, compared Kanhaiya with Ambedkar and said Kanhaiya has a vision for India. Last but not least, Barkha Dutt of Radia tapes fame went all out to make Kanhaiya a famous personality by interviewing him immediately after his release from jail and then writing a long article on NDTV about her being the only journalist to have interviewed the gen next superstar and visionary politician with wonderful clarity of thought.

The Afzal Guru event is not the only controversy that Kanhaiya has been involved in. On 10th March 2016, an ex JNU student by name Kamlesh Narwana unveiled an unsigned University order in which Kanhaiya was fined by the JNU administration for misbehaving with a girl student and threatening her. JNU Administration later confirmed the authenticity of the letter and that action was taken against Kanhaiya. According to Narwana, Kanhaiya was urinating in the open and when the girl protested against this, he became abusive and started threatening her. The All India Students Federation of course rubbished the complaint and said that this was done to malign Kanhaiya’s name.

Let’s now look at Kanhaiya’s candidature in the Lok Sabha polls. Kanhaiya was all set to be a part of the Mahagathbandhan or the Grand Alliance comprising of parties that apart from Modi hatred, dynastic politics and penchant for corruption, have no common ideology. There is no big deal in leaders sharing stage, abusing the Prime Minister one by one and pretending to be united against the so called fascist government. The real deal comes in during the seat sharing when no party wants to cede ground to the other.

In the state of Bihar, tough negotiations were held by the secular parties and finally they reached an agreement where the RJD would fight on 20 seats, the Congress on 9 seats, RLSP (which was with the NDA earlier) on 5 seats and 3 seats each for VIP and HAM. To its dismay, the CPI was completely snubbed and left out of this Grand Alliance and with that disappeared Kanhaiya’s hopes of contesting the elections as a part of the Mahagathbandhan. The CPI criticized the Mahagathbandhan for not taking them aboard and has decided to field Kanhaiya from Begusarai. RJD candidate from Begusarai Tanveer Hasan has dismissed Kanhaiya as a serious contender for this constituency and said that the real fight is between Giriraj Singh and him.

Kanhaiya, on his part, has been soft on the RJD candidate and has made a statement that the real fight is against Giriraj. All this highlights the chaos and total lack of unity that is prevailing in the anti Modi factions currently. On the other hand, Giriraj Singh is looking to contest the elections from Nawada, while the BJP Central leadership is keen on him contesting from Begusarai.

There is no doubt that Kanhaiya is a good orator and has enjoyed adulations for his anti Modi speeches during his days as JNU Students Union President. Politics can be ruthless and after the royal snub, Kanhaiya must have realized that it’s going to be an uphill task ahead. It is yet to be seen if the electorate from Begusarai would choose the Congress-RJD combine that is synonymous with corruption or the BJP-JDU that has delivered in the past or Kanhaiya Kumar, who has no real achievements to show apart from having a cluttered and hate filled ideology in the name of being liberal.

अर्बन नक्सलियों की फैक्ट्री : जवाहर लाल नेहरू विश्वविद्यालय

0

जवाहर लाल नेहरू विश्वविद्यालय में जिस तरह का माहौल पिछले कई दशकों से बना हुआ है, वह देश और समाज दोनों के लिए चिंता का विषय है. ऐसा कभी नही लगा कि जो लोग इस तथाकथित यूनिवर्सिटी में आते हैं, उनका मकसद पढाई लिखाई होता है. अभी हाल ही में इस यूनिवर्सिटी के सैंकड़ों अर्बन नक्सलियों ने यूनिवर्सिटी के वाईस चांसलर के घर पर उस समय हमला कर दिया जिस समय उनकी पत्नी घर पर अकेली थीं और खुद वाईस चांसलर उस समय किसी ऑफिसियल मीटिंग में व्यस्त थे. इस यूनिवर्सिटी में पढ़ने की नौटंकी करने वाले इन अर्बन नक्सलियों ने इस तरह की आपराधिक वारदात को पहली बार अंजाम दिया हो, ऐसी भी बात नहीं है. इस तरह की घिनौनी हरकतें इस यूनिवर्सिटी में अक्सर होती रहती हैं. इन आपराधिक वारदातों के बढ़ने की एक ख़ास वजह यह भी है कि जब तक केंद्र में मोदी सरकार नहीं आयी थी, तब तक तो इन अर्बन नक्सलियों को अपनी गुंडागर्दी करने की पूरी छूट मिली हुई थी क्योंकि कमोबेश इन लोगों की विचारधारा का समर्थन करने वाली सरकारें देश की सत्ता पर अपना कब्ज़ा जमाये हुए थीं.

मोदी सरकार के आने के बाद से इन लोगों की नाज़ायज़ गतिविधियां जनता के सामने आनी शुरू हो गयी हैं और देश की जनता को यह मालूम पड़ने लगा है कि इस तरह के तथाकथित शिक्षण संस्थानों में शिक्षा के नाम पर क्या गुल खिलाये जा रहे हैं. कुछ ही सालों पहले इस यूनिवर्सिटी के कुछ तथाकथित छात्रों ने “पाकिस्तान जिंदाबाद” और “भारत तेरे टुकड़े होंगे” आदि नारे लगाकर एक कार्यक्रम का आयोजन भी किया था, जिसका समर्थन केजरीवाल और राहुल गाँधी दोनों ने किया था. जब इस तरह के नेता इनके काले कारनामों का खुले आम समर्थन करेंगे तो भला इनकी हिम्मत कैसे नहीं बढ़ेगी ? सरकार ने इन लोगों पर उस समय देशद्रोह का मामला भी दर्ज़ किया था, जिसमे केजरीवाल और कांग्रेस पार्टी की मिलीभगत से इन लोगों को दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट से न सिर्फ जमानत मिल गयी थी, उनमे से एक आरोपी कन्हैया कुमार बिहार के बेगूसराय लोकसभा निर्वाचन क्षेत्र से सांसद का चुनाव लड़ने की भी जुर्रत कर रहा है.

अभी हाल ही में दिल्ली पुलिस ने इन सभी आरोपियों के खिलाफ अदालत में चार्ज शीट भी फाइल की है लेकिन अदालत ने तब तक मामले में आगे की सुनवाई से इंकार कर दिया है, जब तक दिल्ली की केजरीवाल सरकार इसके लिए अपनी लिखित में सहमति न दे दे. लेकिन भला केजरीवाल जी ऐसा क्यों करेंगे ? जिन लोगों का केजरीवाल पूरे दिल से समर्थन करते हैं और जिन आरोपियों के साथ वह मंच भी साझा करते हों, भला उन्ही के खिलाफ मुक़दमा चलाने की इज़ाज़त केजरीवाल जी कैसे दे देंगे. लिहाज़ा वह मामला भी खटाई में पड गया और आरोपी कन्हैया कुमार सांसद बनने के सपने देखता हुआ बेगूसराय पहुँच गया.

इन अर्बन नक्सलियों की हिम्मत बढ़ने की एक वजह और भी है- वह है हमारी अदालतों का इनके प्रति बेहद लचीला रवैया- अगर देशद्रोह के मामले में ही दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट ने इन लोगों को कुछ सालों पहले जमानत नहीं दी होती तो आज इन लोगों की हिम्मत नहीं पड़ती कि वे सैंकड़ों की संख्या में इकट्ठे होकर एक अकेली महिला पर वहशियाना हमला कर दें. अदालत ने तो पी एम मोदी की हत्या के आरोपी अर्बन नक्सलियों को भी जमानत पर छोड़ने में किसी तरह की देरी नहीं दिखाई थी.

अगर यह सब कुछ इसी तरह चलने वाला है तो सरकार को किसी तरह से इस बात का हक़ नहीं है कि वह देशवासियों के टैक्स के पैसों को इस तरह के शिक्षण संस्थानों को चलाने में बर्बाद करे. जिस यूनिवर्सिटी में पिछले ७० सालों में पढाई लिखाई के नाम पर सिर्फ गुंडागर्दी अंजाम दी गयी हो और जहां सिर्फ अर्बन नक्सलियों की पैदावार बढ़ रही हो, उसे जितना जल्द हो सके,अलविदा कह देना चाहिए.

Musings from a republic day morning: A post-Pulwama retrospection

0

The following is the reproduction of a speech which I had delivered before an audience consisting mainly of university students and staff. This transpired on January 26, 2019, i.e. on a Republic Day morning, exactly eighteen days before the Jihadi massacre at Pulwama took place; and precisely one month before the Indian Air Force avenged that massacre by conducting air strikes on Jaish-e-Mohammed’s Jihad-training camps at Balakot, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan.

In retrospect, the speech appears to have anticipated the massacre of Indian lives by Maulana Masood Azhar’s band of Jihadi terrorists, which is but one in a series of many such murderous acts by them and other terror groups of their ilk. Such anticipation is due to the inherent flaws and contradictions in the way our republic has been imagined and constituted, which is what compels us to take up the subject time and again (and especially on a Republic Day morning), until those flaws are finally rectified and the lives of Indian citizens are secured against the malicious, imperialistic aspirations of Jihad for good. This is exactly what the present speech attempts to do. And when we speak of the lives of Indian citizens, we must also count those that serve in our armed forces – the vigilant peacekeepers in areas which have been fractured by those very flaws of our republic, perhaps beyond repair.

The Balakot air strikes have no doubt been a positive step towards ensuring the safety of India’s people and her borders, but it is far from a systemic, permanent solution. Such a permanent solution can only be brought about by undoing the political machinations meant for a deliberate and gradual weakening of our republic’s foundations, especially of its civilizational foundation. The questions raised through the following meditation on that problem and the contradictions of the Republic indicated therein make it worthwhile to look back on this speech. It is hoped that the retrospective reading of this openly apprehensive speech, in light of the Pulwama tragedy, might spur those who wield the most direct means of change into taking positive action. To that end, we reproduce the speech here in toto:

Precisely sixty-nine years ago on this day, the Constitution of India came into force. Simultaneously, the country which had been granted its independence from a full hundred-and-ninety years of the British Raj, conferred upon herself the moniker ‘Republic of India’. At the time, the Constitution had been content to define the country as a ‘sovereign democratic republic’, and not the ‘sovereign socialist secular democratic republic’ that it was later styled into, during the 1976 emergency declared by Mrs Indira Gandhi, the then Prime Minister of India. I believe it is most remarkable in the history of constitutions of the world at large, that a government had to suspend the very democracy that was so characteristic of the republic in order to ‘upgrade’ it. In fact, anyone familiar with this history of the Indian constitution will not fail to notice that democracy is conspicuously a more fundamental characteristic of the Republic of India, compared to the characterisations ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’, which were surreptitiously appended to the constitution in the 42nd amendment during what has been described by many as the darkest period of the modern history of our country.

As such, all of us may agree that it won’t be too impertinent to briefly reflect on the impact of these appendages to the constitution on a day that is meant to celebrate its coming-into-effect. Here is an illustration of such impact in the popular domain of colloquial communication: in recent times, a peculiar word has crept into the vocabulary of social network users in India as well as those of the Indian diaspora. The word in question is ‘sickular’ – a tongue-in-cheek fusion of the English words ‘sick’ and ‘secular’. It is used disparagingly to highlight the politics of those academics, intellectuals and politicians who claim to promote ‘secular’ values in India in a manner that often turns out, in the final analysis, to be counterproductive and distinctly non-secular. What, we may wonder, has prompted the coinage of this term amid the lively democratic discussions that take place on social media? Apart from being a striking linguistic phenomenon, the coining of this curious word must be read in its proper political context, lest it is misunderstood. Used as a pejorative, it may appear that the user of the term rejects egalitarianism, secularism as well as all democratic values. Indeed, in left-liberal quarters it is customary to find any criticism of the Indian brand of secularism being labelled as rantings of the extreme right. But in the context of India’s recent socio-political history, one that confronts a serious threat to the very foundations and possibility of a real secular state, the word sickularism actually highlights the crucial and often unspoken limits of secularism.

The prolonged existence of Article 370, for example, is a testimony to that flirtation with insincere, ill-defined and ill-implemented secularism. That self-defeating article from the Indian Constitution allows autonomy to an Indian state where the so-called minority is in the majority, and where they rule over the real minority with a parallel constitution, refusing to provide basic human rights to this minority: viz. the Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists of Jammu and Kashmir. Again, article 35A mockingly undermines the very sovereignty of the republic which we are supposed to celebrate today. This article of our constitution is squarely exploited by those who wish to establish a theocratic state in India. By granting hundreds of acres of Indian territory and rights to illegal immigrants in order to change the demography of Hindu-majority Jammu and to provide safe havens for carrying out anti-India activities, including jihadi terrorism on Indian soil, this diabolical article functions as an instrument of undoing the Indian republic and remains a cruel joke on all the celebrations and charades of development, military power and patriotism.

What use is such secularism which perpetuates unequal laws and injustice?

What use is such secularism that teaches us to be blind to the genocidal activities of certain groups, and demands that we condone the same?

What good is such socialism which has a legacy of not only discrediting but even disrespecting modern India’s greatest Kshatriya Netaji Subhash Chandra Basu – whose birthday passed almost unnoticed only three days ago on the 23rd of this month – with foul words?    

It is this set of concerns that forces us to be cynical about the nature of our Constitution. It is this set of doubts that cloud our mind regarding the ulterior motive of our lawmakers. It is this set of questions that prompts us to pose a further question, with an even bigger question mark after it: Whither Indian republic, then?

Vande Mataram.

Rahul Gandhi’s offer of Rupees 72000 bribe to poor is a cruel joke

0

Rahul Gandhi’s poll promise of 72K per year is yet another in the series of empty slogans and fake promises that the dynasty raises time and again as a vote winning gimmick.

He is trying to bribe a major section of Indian population into voting for him. It is a vicious cycle. First, generation after generation, millions upon millions of our countrymen have remained poor due to the corrupt practices and crony capitalism of the Gandhi dynasty. And now the scion of this dynasty is trying to lure the same section of the population, living on the edges of the society and barely making the ends meet. He wants to exploit their poverty and is trying to entice them with a paltry sum of money. He is inept for the post and his family has indulged in rampant corruption for decades. All that he has to offer is a shrill campaign of lies against Modi. He has no vision for the future of India to share

Rahul Gandhi’s great grandfather Mr. Jawahar Lal Nehru was given the noble task of building modern India which he royally messed up. Our nation is still suffering the consequences of his follies in Kashmir. Due to his lack of vision, India faced humiliation at China’s hands in 1962 . Jawahar Lal Nehru talked about poverty eradication. Poverty still exists.

Rahul Gandhi’s grand mother Smt. Indira Gandhi gave a slogan of “Gareebi Hataao” in 1970s. Poverty still exists. His father Mr. Rajiv Gandhi also talked about poverty eradication. After looting the country’s coffers in Bofors deal, he went on to “enlighten” the nation that for each Rupee given by the government for welfare, only 5 paisa reached the poor and the weak.

Who was siphoning the remaining 95 percent while the poor died in the poorly maintained government hospitals? Who was sending their children to study in Harvard while the common citizen struggled to provide his children a basic education? Was it not the cronies of the Gandhi dynasty?

His Mother and he himself were the super PM for 10 years. Corruption was rampant in the schemes like MNREGA. More than the poor, it was the congress fed ecosystem of the middlemen who were the real beneficiaries. Millions upon millions of our countrymen remain poor.

Under Modi government, steps have been taken to empower the poor. Efforts have been made to create environment of opportunity in place of empty slogans and temporary freebies. According to World Data Lab, extreme poverty in India has reduced from 14 per cent in 2012 to 4 per cent in rural areas and from 9.5 per cent to 3.8 per cent in urban areas.in the last 5 years following poverty eradication steps have been taken which have made a real impact:

Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana Gramin: Over 15 per cent of the 54.95 lakh houses sanctioned in last three years under the Centre’s flagship Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban) have been completed, according to data provided by the Housing and Urban Affairs (HUA) Ministry. The government has set a target of one crore houses to be constructed in urban areas across the country over a period of seven years from 2015 to 2022.

Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana: Over 6 crore LPG connections given so far.

Pradhan Mantri Ayushman Yojana: The largest public health insurance program in the world, Ayushman Bharat, promises to insure 500 million poor people across the country.

Direct Benefits Transfer

  • Cooking gas Subsidies
  • Incentives to small entrepreneurs
  • 100 percent electrification

I hope we as a nation are not deceived this time and make a smart choice at the voting booth.

Diversity and quality can’t co-exist

0

I was recently reading about the Amazon Rainforests, famous for its rich biodiversity. It is home to about one-third of all living species in the world. It very much reminded me of my country India, known similarly for its cultural diversity.

If a tiger were to be given the same status as a deer, equality would get justice, but would diversity? Is it not the uniqueness of the tiger and the deer that give the jungle its kaleidoscopic diversity? If a lion were to be given the same status as a lioness, surely feminazis in India would be happy, but would the lions survive? If the lioness started to be the king of the jungle and sleeping 18 hours a day like her male counterpart, because some Indian feminists asked her to do so, would her species not die of hunger? Some things should be left as it is, as nature and God intended it. If people like us tried to intervene, the world would go topsy turvy.

I find it so stupid to see that people who advocate for equality among all castes, creeds, races, religions and gender, are the same people who say we should uphold India’s diversity. How do I tell them that Equalism and Diversity are the exact opposites of each other?

If I dress an entire classroom of students in the exact same uniform, they are all equals in the eye of the teacher, but then where is the diversity? Diversity is but another name for different-ness. The speciality of India doesn’t lie in seeing the different castes, communities and religions as one, but in giving a panoramic view containing all of them, with individual space to express themselves.

Yes, equality stifles diversity.

This same argument can also be verified with respect to the rising wave of feminism in India. Feminists say that women are subject to gender bias, which is true. But, then they go on to demand every equal status as that of men. Think rationally, woman labour cannot do the same amount of hard work as men can do. This is not a bias, this is what God intended, he reserved women for some other jobs, like taking the species ahead. Like the way a man can’t do what a woman can, a woman too can’t do what a man can, and therefore no question of equality, when there is no compatibility! When nature intended man and woman to be different in all aspects, we literally are a no-one to change that law!

The uniqueness of a man lies in his masculinity, no one can take it from him. Similarly, the specialty of a woman lies in her femininity, which no one can take away from her. So, why do we fight in vain to make them equals when the truth is they never were equals, and never shall be! The goal of feminism should not be to be equals as men, for that curbs diversity and individuality. The goal of feminism should be to empower women within their reachable realm, without any competition with what is outside. There should be no comparison with men, there should be a comparison among equals. The target of every feminist should be to help those women who are not treated as women and get them their position in society.

To make my point even more solid, take the example of Europe and Arabia. These to geographical regions were converted to 100% Christianity and Islam respectively, thus enforcing monotony, homogeny. Thus, there exists no diversity there. But Hinduism never had such a goal, because Hinduism respects individuality, diversity. It is because in India, a Muslim is identified as a Muslim and a Hindu is identified as a Hindu, there exists diversity. Being Indian is fine, but then, where is the diversity, where diversity shouldn’t be equated to bias. West and the Middle East have shown us that plurality thrives where there is heterogeny. Thus, an attempt to call for Equality by liberals in India is hollow!

Equality can be achieved among equals, and diversity among plurals. The common rhetoric today in defence of the liberals go as ‘All Indians are equal’. My only denial is that all Indians are not equal, and that is what is the specialty of our country and thus any fake attempt to label us as equals will have no good results, but a result where a collective identity will be lost.

Lastly, equality and diversity cannot coexist simply because of their revolting nature. Strength lies in differences and not similarities.

 

Modi is NOT a ‘Mahatma’, but who needs one now?

0

As Kohli’s cricketing talent can never take away the tag of ‘master blaster’ from Sachin or for that matter, Sachin’s talent cannot take away Gavaskar’s ‘little master’ title, similarly, Gandhi’s ‘mahatma’ tag can in now way dim the halo around Sri Narendra Modi’s image.

Modi’s incorruptibility, his decisive stand, his digital connect with the people around, his oratory skills, his clean intent, his novel ideas – these are rare hallmarks of a visionary leader. Don’t just go by what might have been done – look at what has been done in so less time.

Some thinkers, afraid to call themselves from either of the two schools of thoughts, now identify themselves as Centrists (in relation to Leftists or Rightists) and write editorial pieces on agenda-driven print or online media, opposing or defaming every acceptable lacunae in a democratic government like ours. They now call the PM’s decisive stand as his autocracy, his efforts to bring in justice (denied so long) to the Hindus (little affecting the causes of the minorities around) as his divisiveness, his forward-looking defence deals as his hollow chest-thumping, his lion-like stand on security as his war-mongering attitude.

The situation becomes tough when a considerable chunk of the youth force with less time and less interest for political affairs at disposal rely on such shoddy logic to reach to an illusory conclusion.

The sycophant mainstream media quite astutely highlights every single minor flaw in the character of the Ruling Party and ascribes the blame to Modi directly. The positive stories happening across do not get either screen time or print space whereas the sycophant pens run on to project the exceptions as rules, thus fooling a certain section of people to believe an illusion.

The only thing that is perhaps working and working without fail is that a set of young minds that earlier used to shy away from political affairs have taken it upon themselves to adore politics. In Modi’s way of revamping the Indian politics, they have seen a promise that politics too can bring in positive changes to the fate of a nation when a person’s intent is clean.

Many youngsters are day by day becoming more vocal about their political affiliations using their own logic, little caring for what the mainstream media wants them to believe. Social media has come in as a boon now. The best example is how the mainstream media’s umpteen attempts to bring to the fore Modi’s dubious past (about Godhra) has failed miserably just because of the tangible changes that meet the eye since his ascendance to the PM’s chair. India is shining.

The Indian youth in charge today knows, accepts (and can even advocate if need be) that Modi is not a Mahatma, but who needs one at this juncture? What they all aspire for is a strong, self-reliant and vibrant India that the world should openly applaud. And Modi for sure has been driving them closer to their aspirational goal, with every passing day.

Farmers’ woes Part 1: Irrigation and Transportation

0

The place was humongous. The ground was uneven, trees and plants were planted randomly. Since, it was a full moon, it was not completely dark. But it looked scary, the shrubs, the bushes and their shadows looked like ghosts.

At the extreme left, the ground was slightly more even compared to the rest. A light bulb was loosely hanging on the only electric pole in the area, below which a young man was searching something hurriedly. He kept on looking for hours, some  passers by also joined him. The group of people were aggressively looking everywhere, they were screaming and shouting. It had become a complete chaos.

At some distance on the right was an old man sitting, trying to understand what was the chaos all about. After some time, he could not resist himself and walked up to the young man who had gathered all others.

The old man went up to the young man, asked “what are you looking for?” The young man replied “I am looking for a golden key.” The old man asked again “You people are looking at the same place for hours. Are you sure the key is here? What if the key is not here and somewhere else?”

To this, the young man looked at the old man, stared for a few minutes, took a deep breath and said “See old man, I know exactly where the key is or rather the keys are. Look at this place, this place, where I am looking for the keys is beneficial for me, it is safe and comfortable, I could keep looking for ever here. If I tell these people that the key is behind a bush in a ditch, they would make me go there. Do you know what all dangerous creatures could come out of the bushes? I know the dangers because that place was not such a mess since beginning, people for their selfish gains made it like this and people like me for our own selfish gains looked the other way. It would take real hard work, commitment, a lot of time, efforts and patience to get the key.

The old man went back to his seat at the side. After a few minutes, he got and went up to the young leader and said “What will you do if I go ahead and tell these people that the keys are not here but in the bushes?” The young man smiled at him and said “You are most welcome, old man. Good luck with that. And by the way, you would not be the first one trying to do that. Many came and went before you, but I am still here, you can’t do anything about that

The strange part of the story is that the old man was getting a very hard time explaining this to a lot of people who continued searching at the wrong place.

Some Indian politicians would relate to this story. For instance if you take the rural or farmer’s distress you could very well see this. Farm loan waiver and minimum income is one such area where some politicians are trying to find the key to the farmers’ issues. There is nothing new in this, every five year the party who tries to run an occupation, offers this waiver. And then what happens? the farmers may not commit suicide that year, but they commit it the next year. Why? Because the underlying problems remained intact. The only thing these waiver do is make the farmers dependent of the government.

The very first problem  and the most shameful of all, the biggest reason as to why any farmer, big or small, rich or poor should not vote for Congress or for any party looking for a coalition with INC is irrigation. Only one third of India’s cultivable land is reliably irrigated i.e. by rivers, major-minor canals, rain-harvesting systems, ground water tube-wells etc. Two third of India’s cultivable land is dependent on the monsoon. WHY? In fact, when the Atal Bihari Vajpayee led NDA propagated the idea of interlinking rivers, it was strongly opposed. Who opposed it? The so-called environmentalists along with the Congress opposed it.

Mr. Rahul Gandhi who is now pretending to be the messiah of farmers just before elections, in 2009 said on record that interlinking rivers would be a disaster. A disaster for who? I guess for the party who wants farmers to be dependent of the doles that would be offered just before the elections every five years. How disgusting it is to see a country where at some part the people are dying because of drought and at some other part people are dying because of flood at approximately the same time. How is farm loan waiver going to fix this irrigation problem? Do you think farmers are taking loans so as to dig a water canal?

In addition to this, the one third part that is reliably irrigated also consists of tube wells. How are tube wells running? Even after seven decades in 2014 there were more than eighteen thousand villages without electricity. Those tube wells were running on diesel generators; an extra cost forced on the farmers. Even if every village has electricity access, the farmers would easily irrigate the farms by themselves. Electrification is a three-step process. The first is to extend the infrastructure to the village, the second is to connect the household and the third is to ensure reliable and affordable supply on a sustained basis.

The Congress government in decades of its rule, could not even extend the infrastructure to the villages i.e just installing a transformer in the village and connecting it to a power grid. At least Modi government has achieved the first goal, and the second goal is progressing. How is farm loan waiver going to fix this electricity problem? Do you think farmers are taking loans to install transformers? Talking about renewable sources of generating electricity like solar panels and wind mills with in congress rule would look a distant dream. PM Modi at the time when he was a CM made sure that every one had an access to electricity, he knew electricity would allow them the access to water. He had a vision then and has a vision now. He pushed the solar power project like no one else.

Moving on to the next critical issue. If somehow a small farmer survives all this, even with a decent productivity, he might end up in a big loss. There is still an extremely critical piece missing; transportation, the road connectivity. You have six lane highways for you, or a separate lane for the VIPs-VVIPs but not a single lane “pakka” road connecting the villages and that too in seven decades. That’s a shame especially when you do not require high tech services for building a very basic “pakka” road. Cold storage facilities or food processing industries in rural areas would look like a fantasy when the most basic infrastructure in the form of roads was missing.

The farmers either ended up wasting their produce or sold it at an extremely low prices, either to the villagers or to the middlemen.  If there were good roads available, they would have had an access to a bigger market. Modi government in its first term has built roads at a rate three times faster than any other previous government. How is farm loan waiver going to fix this transportation problem? Do you think farmers are taking loans to build roads? Even if you don’t like Modi for any reason, you should not vote for Congress or for any party going for the coalition with INC, if you do so, you get the same what you have always been getting. Charity every five years at your own cost.

The existence of reliable irrigation and transportation solutions are the most basic and mandatory conditions for a sustained agriculture growth. However, they are not the only ones. There are many other factors resulting in a chaos. Low productivity, soil nutrition, fertilizers, pesticides etc. I have gathered some more information on these factors too and am currently putting them together in the form of a separate post. Whatever be the case, one thing is certain, farm loan waiver is not going to fix anything at all. If it were any good, they should have already fixed the issues. There have been doles offered every election.

Farm loan waiver is just a way to buy the votes and nothing else. A farmer’s debt is not a cause of a problem, the debt is a result of a problem. The real problems are the reasons why a farmer is not able to repay his loans even after working several times harder than required. He gives his best, works day and night but still cannot get the required results.

If anyone wants to solve the problem, he/she should at least look at the actual problems. What do you treat? The fever or the virus that causes the fever? Fever is an indication that the body has been attacked by some foreign particles. Fever is a rise in body temperature. The treatment includes killing those foreign particles i.e. different types of viruses. You don’t put yourself in a refrigerator to lower the temperature i.e. get rid of fever. Do you?

Please stay tuned for the next blog: Farmer’s woes Part 2: Low Productivity.

Thanks for your time and patience!!! Have a look at my blog : Infinite Sea of Opportunities.

Also read: Floods and Democracy & The addiction to Freebies and Discounts

A single phase election in West Bengal- Can it be made a reality?

0

As LS poll 2019 draws nearer, fight between two main parties in West Bengal is gaining momentum. Right since the EC announced 7 phase elections in the State, rival parties have been indulging in liberal use of rhetoric and abuses. But even these can be considered benign political conversations, if the Bengal’s bloody history of elections over past several years is kept in view. The last Panchayat election had witnessed unprecedented intimidation and violence claiming nearly a hundred lives.

Add to that the news that on March 9, 2019, 1000 kg potassium nitrate was seized in North Kolkata. Five days later, 6650 kg aluminium nitrate, 2650 kg gelatin sticks and 52,500 detonators were seized in Saltora, Bankura. The enormity of these seizure reflected in the headlines of the New India Express of March 16 which said: ‘WEST BENGAL HEADED FOR AN EXPLOSIVE ELECTION: Seizure of two massive consignments of explosives is giving cops the jitters.’

On the eve of the crucial LS polls, where the stake of political parties is extremely high for a variety of reasons, visible or not, the people of the state are anxious for legitimate reasons. In this election which would potentially chalk the future path of politics of India, they are legitimately anxious to be able to participate in a fair and full measure. To do that they need the assurance of full proof security while casting their votes for, whichever candidate and party they choose.

In this context, the BJP leaders approaching the EC with a request to treat all booths in the State as ‘highly sensitive’ has raised varieties of reactions in public and political circles. Though BJP is still viewed as a kind of common enemy by all parties in the State, the other major opposition parties such as Congress and CPM, also agree with the validity of this demand. On the other hand, the ruling TMC has harshly criticised the move and described it as an act of nervousness on the part of BJP. The party, seemingly as a shrewd strategy, also projected it as the  ‘latest act of insult by the central government to the people of Bengal’. This seemed somewhat premature and hyper-reaction considering that the EC itself did not give any kind of reaction, much less a decision.

However, a ball has been set rolling and it is likely to gather velocity as days pass. Interestingly, no local media went to study the public opinion on such an important issue and present an objective picture of how people themselves looked at the issue. It certainly could have been a valuable service on their part for the welfare of the society as a whole. Be that as it may, everyone who has a stake in the state, whether they be people or political parties, would do well to examine the proposition in a dispassionate manner and try to optimise the outcome from the conflict which is still nebulous. False vanity or greed on the part of the political parties may act to the detriment of the society and the State including their own long-term interests. The following analysis is aimed at helping them looking objectively not only into the issue but also facing the greater challenge of improving the law and order situation in the state in general.

There are basic contradictions in the ruling party i.e., TMC’s stand. It is opposing the BJP’s demand citing following reasons: (a) West Bengal is peaceful and it has satisfactory law and order situation; (b) though there were violence in last Panchayat elections, its own members formed the majority amongst those murdered. If the party makes an introspection it would realize unreasonableness of its own stand. The very fact that nearly 100 people died in the elections at the grass root level of democracy conclusively proves that the law and order situation is far from satisfactory.

As a matter of fact, the party ought to feel more concerned about the issue if it genuinely values the security and lives of its members. Analytically speaking, the lack of safety of political workers and especially of the ruling party points to the presence of strong anti-social forces which is in a position to defy the authority of the state government. In other words, contrary to what it may boast of or brag about, in the heart of its heart the state government knows that has not been able to measure up to the challenges of these forces with its police and other law enforcing forces.

But if the ruling TMC is still adamant and does not require any special help from the EC, which may be available for the asking, it is clearly in a state of dangerous denial. Actual law and order situation is a matter of fact. It is what it is. Who knows it better than the discerning and regular viewers of Bengali TV channels? Daily news bulletins of West Bengal based TV channel depict agonising law and order situation.

Hardly a day passes when some or more or all of these news items do not make headlines e.g., (a) intra party clashes (often involving the ruling party) involving liberal use of fire arms leading to death and or serious injury to political workers; (b) inter-party clashes leading to death or injury; (c) detection of bomb manufacturing activities in villages; (d) seizure of counterfeit notes; (e) explosion of bombs in village homes with the causes often remain unexplained; (e) dead bodies with injuries found lying by the side of railway tracks; (f) recovery of illegal fire arms; (g) arrest of persons holding unauthorised fire arms; (f) fight between cadres of political parties using fire arms and bombs; (g) killing of relatives for the sake of property; (h) son or daughter severely persecuting their elderly parents; (i) mob attack on hospitals and doctors vandalising properties and causing bodily injuries; (j) discovery of illicit liquors; (k) houses of political leaders and workers vandalised, and so on.

The scale, frequency and the spread of such incidents clearly suggest that the police has been hard put to meet the challenges of the anti-social elements. Obviously, the assured availability of fire arms and bombs, the manufacturing of which seem to have spread like cancer across the state may be giving the goons the temerity to carry on with their activities in spreading a mayhem with impunity. It is common sense that one bomb making unit in one village can keep the people of a cluster of villages mortally afraid and influence the pattern of interactions between the anti-social elements and the law enforcement agencies. It may not be out of place to say that the conventional police force, weak in terms of numbers, equipment and logistics, tend to become helpless to the might of the goons with assured access to unending supply to illegal fire arms.

It is high time that the whole of the State should voluntarily undergo an one-time complete ‘purging’ of these fire arms and bombs. This task is however a much tougher challenge than it looks. These dark forces have long past and they are well entrenched. Nothing less than a week-long intensive military operation alone can achieve this purpose. It is a certainty that this would ensure a peaceful election at the immediate. More importantly it would exert also a dramatically positive impact on the law and order situation in the State. It is the ruling party, much more than the opposition, which would benefit from the exercise in the long run. It would make governance easier and enable the state government to further concentrate on development works.

The opposition parties too need to welcome such an exercise. It gives them more than what they have demanded now. They apprehend the pervasive violence would work to the advantage of the ruling party. An army mop up operation will completely stamp out such a possibility. However, in the longer term the deserving party or parties would reap the benefit. Viewed from this angle, the ruling TMC should consider the issue holistically and pragmatically and not respond in a knee-jerk fashion.

It is a fact that the entire country has serious concerns about the law and order situation in West Bengal. The fact that West Bengal is a border province and has witnessed bomb making activities by radical Islamist forces like JMB and others as was revealed in places like Khagragarh in Burdwan and also Birbhum district. These add to the nation’s anxiety. This election presents the TMC with an opportunity to resolve this longstanding problem of proliferation of ‘bomb making’ with its attendant consequences. It can make use of the forthcoming election and urge the EC to get the services of the army to carry out a state wide ‘search’ operation for about a week so that the entire stock pile of fire arms and bombs is cleared at one go. This will be to its long term advantage of the people. In the immediate it would blunt the attack of its political opponents and mobilise favourable public opinion in its favour. That can put in good stead in this election.

Finally, irrespective of gains to political parties individually, a holistic improvement in law and order situation would give a six stage promotion to the State. In other words, going forward it may be possible to hold a single phase election in West Bengal. Even if it appears as utopian, nothing other than an ‘out of box’ kind of solution alone can handle a complex situation like West Bengal. In fact so complex that even ruling party is living in a state of ‘denial’ and ‘helplessness’. Rising above partisan interests and false vanities all parties need to proactively consider this alternative.

Are you ‘Tamilan’ or ‘Dravidian’, the wicked ploy of DMK

0

The question of whether the people of Tamil Nadu are Tamilian or Dravidian is quite difficult to answer and some would say they are Tamil people but those who follow DMK would say they are Tamil speaking Dravidian.

The confusion of Dravidian or Tamil is deep rooted and the confusion was intelligently being created by EV Ramasamy Naicker and the sister political force of EVR ideology, the DMK. EVR successfully created the confusion and masked the real identity of Tamil which DMK later established and implanted in the gene of most people in the state.

The anti-Brahmin voice in Tamil Nadu was raised mainly by non-Brahmin upper caste people who were mostly not of Tamil origin like Naicker, Chetty, Reddy and Nair. Mudaliar, Pillai etc., joined the group subsequently. They carefully crafted their voice against Brahmin supremacy and formed a political party called Justice Party. May be to avoid the possible re-questioning of their true non Tamil identity, they imported the term ‘Dravidian race’ which was actually used by Bishop Caldwell to divide the people of Tamil Nadu from rest of India, especially from Hindus by calling people of rest of India as Aryan race. Until EVR took over justice party, the Tamil identity was never being masked by Dravidian term.

Caldwell wants to isolate the state through Aryan-Dravidian theory so that the people of the state can be easily converted to Christianity. Perhaps Caldwell wants to mask the real identity of Tamil with Dravidian for the purpose of conversion whereas EVR also might have used the same trick may be to hide own non-Tamil identity that he was not belonging to Tamil Nadu by using the people of the state for his political popularity.

The description of suppressed community in Tamil Nadu as ‘adi Dravidar’ not adi-Tamil speaking people’ by Karunanidhi government through a G.O. raises serious doubts on the Dravidian politics and the possible intentions. The same Karunanidhi government described the suppressed Telugu speaking people as Adi –Telugu speaking community and not adi-Dravidiar in the same G.O.  According to EVR and his disciplines like Karunanidhi, the people from all the southern states are Dravidian race. For Telugu speaking people, DMK did everything possible to preserve their Telugu identity whereas for Tamil speaking people, Karunanidhi put Dravidian cap called Adi Dravidar not Adi-Tamilar.

If Tamil Desiyan ever wants to flourish and spring in the state, they must engage in positive politics and the politics of exposing and attenuating the DMK instead of targeting people from other states who are settled in Tamil Nadu. As long as Dravidian politics of DMK continues, Tamil Desiyam would find it difficult to establish itself.

The bigger clarity that needs to be created among people of Tamil Nadu is not about how to remove or incapacitate the people from other states settled in Tamil Nadu but how to stop DMK from coming back to power. DMK has only distorted the Tamil identity with Dravidian tag.

The difference between DMK and AIADMK is that AIADMK follows largely the paths of Anna who always promoted the Tamil ethos and values whereas DMK as it stands today is promoting family and dynasty politics and nothing else. By constantly opposing Brahmins, calling them as Aryan race, spreading negativity against North Indians and Hindus, DMK could successfully brainwash people of the state to believe that they belong to Dravidian race. But after the entry of Seeman, Sakthivel, Maniarasan etc., the ploy of DMK has been thoroughly exposed and people of the state have started to realize how DMK in the name of Dravidian and Tamil, has taken the people of the state for a big ride.

AIADMK founded by MGR and the leader of exemplary leadership quality and pro-Tamil commitment, the Amma never tried to hide their identity and instead they pledged their life for the upliftment of the state. They never kindled Tamil chauvinism, instead focused on welfare schemes and programs for the development of the state.

On the other hand, the DMK played politics of Tamil and Dravidian identity and did nothing for the Tamil cause.  When Sri Lanka waged war against Tamil race, Karunanidhi was the chief minister of the state and DMK was also a part of union government in the centre which was headed by congress party. Had DMK and Karunanidhi shown real concern, the mass massacre of Tamil people in Sri Lanka would not have happened. But Karunanidhi showed greater interest in protecting his Chief Minister chair and not Tamil interest.

People of the state were so gullible and that is why they could be taken for a big ride by DMK. The forthcoming election is a wonderful opportunity for the people of the state to show the door to DMK alliance.

Vote for development, sab ka vikas and national security alone can make the state and India prosperous.  AIADMK alliance and Narendra Modi led BJP are largely focusing on the development of Tamil Nadu and how to fulfill the dreams of MGR and Amma. PM Modi alone can save the state from the divisive politics of DMK and congress. Hope the people of the state will recognize the same and would elect Narendra Modi with absolute majority.

Chowkidar Ranganathan

RaGa’s Congress just got defeated by NZ Prime Minister in the race of appeasement politics

0

This horrible woman evokes love in my heart for the Indian National Congress, because, when it comes to cheap appeasement politics, Congress got nothing on Jacinda Ardern.

Broadcasting the Azaan via television, and promoting the hijab to non-Muslim women, as a sign of solidarity and wearing it herself could be accepted, though not without the argument on cultural appropriation the liberals are so sensitive about. But in an attempt to pandering further to the (now) vulnerable and emotionally fragile minority vote bank, she has banned Jorden Peterson’s non-racist, non-Islamophobic, self-help book only because he had once taken a picture with a fan who was wearing an offensive T-shirt. Peterson clicks 1000 fan pics every month. How is he responsible for the NZ incident or a fan’s choice of wardrobe?

What’s more? Dev Patel’s movie Hotel Mumbai, based on the 2008 Mumbai attack, has been banned too. Why? Showing how Lashkar-e-Tayyiba, an active Islamist militant organization, killed 164 innocent INDIANS won’t sit well with the vote bank she is desperate to woo. But why must LeT killing 164 Indians be offensive to the group we are talking about? Whatever happened to “terrorism has no religion”? This is a woman that disregards the brutal killing of 164 people, and does all kinds of nautanki – yep, all that she’s doing is pure nautanki – to demonstrate how much she values the 49. She loves no one but the incoming votes.

With books and movies being banned, whatever happened to FREEDOM OF SPEECH granted by section 14 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (BORA)? Flushed it down the commode!

Islam is followed by 1% of NZ’s total population, and this is the kind of appeasement the PM has resorted to. Had she been our PM, one can only imagine what abyssal she would have hit to secure those 172 million or so votes. We all need to thank our stars, we don’t have this woman in our country. I am guessing all our temples would have been razed to the ground in an institutionalized way, the colors of Holi been snatched away and a black burkhas would have been mandated on women across faiths.