Home Blog Page 402

George Floyd, another forgotten soul

You might be wondering how he’s already a forgotten soul if most of America is burning to get justice for him. Yes, let’s talk about that. Black Lives Matter, of course, they are, blacks are oppressed for hundreds of years, and America grew on it. Today they got civil liberties at least on paper. Unfortunately, neither black people nor the other “neutral” people recognize the struggle of past leadership.

People who lead the protests, who fight for justice should be more careful about the propaganda that spewed on them. Lackluster speeches, irrelevant antidotes, the unclear mission would only make things worse and definitely counterproductive.

When I first heard about BlackLivesMatter movement, I thought this would make difference and make the conversation going on the systematic abuse of power by law enforcement agencies. Instead of debating and discussing the social inequalities and prejudiced opinions towards colored people BLM mostly indulges in whataboutery and righteousness. The moment you talk about good criminals and bad criminals you have already lost the ideological war. Remember people who want to see a change in society and especially for the lives of black people, need to fight the propaganda. This won’t come from just “white supremacists” this comes from media of both sides, politicians from both sides, organizations who want to survive on money laundering within the mask of fighting for social causes.

When an incident occurs, if you think it’s just a natural reaction that comes out from the political corners and especially privileged Hollywood kids, you are wrong. This is the PR opportunity for some, the political opportunity for some, ideological expansion opportunity for some, Like vultures feed on the dead body these opportunists feed on issues which lead to chaos and anarchy. In the end, everybody comes out as saint, it’s all about pointing fingers on people who oppose their ideology, party, or even their color. Real ones who are suffering from these social injustices, prejudiced opinions, power abuse continues to suffer. For the left problem should not be solved, if there is no problem then there won’t be chaos, if there is no chaos there won’t be propaganda, if there is no propaganda there won’t be political space. They need the poor to be poor, underprivileged to be underprivileged, injustices should continue so they can appropriate with useless analogies and illogical social consistencies.

Let’s take George Floyd’s case, no matter which side everybody on, unanimously agree that was a crime, and Floyd should have gotten better treatment and ultimately right justice. Ever since this happened, did you even see anybody talking about the circumstances that he went through, how easily law enforcement could abuse their power in daylight even in this cellphone era?.  George is not the first and definitely not the last, because the people who go on TV for justice for George don’t talk about George, and the people who don’t want Georges to survive obviously don’t want to talk about him. One side goes on rampage, loot, and riot, the other side starts preaching righteousness like everything in the system is so great that there is no problem in the first place.

According to me, BLM wasn’t useful to the core of this issue, all they could do is become a retweet from a celebrity who sits in 10 million dollar mansions while sipping his costliest wine or a 2 min clip in their new cop show. If you move the narrative from George, if you start talking about what is a good riot and what is a bad riot, if you start picking political stands then you are doing more damage to not just blacks but to an entire civil rights issue. Media and other “white supremacy” leadership want you to do that, so they can debate what is the right way to protest and what is wrong way to protest. All the leadership at BLM indulge in this debate, you will never win the argument. Because the moment you pick a reaction to the incident as your cause you have to justify the reaction but you lose the context bid on the incident.

Everybody worried about and discussing the riots in multiple cities, looting of designer stores, rioting the streets. In all these noises, George Floyd is shouting “I can’t breathe, please save me”, yes George still couldn’t breathe because we all forgot “why he died”, “how he died”. All we talk about the anger, reaction, and defend the indefensible crimes. While the real oppressors sit back and watch these go out of hand. They want this to happen so they can show this as a reason for their racism and prejudice. When the mayor of the city won’t talk about the next course of action on criminals who killed George but he was packed with curfew decisions, political war, and stuck in liberal vs conservative debate. Nobody makes him accountable, everybody talks about the attack on police headquarters but nobody is talking about the police officers abusing their power. Every time a George dies, the chaos overtakes the issue. It’s all in the vicious circle, which maintains status-quo so all the vultures can feed on.

The entire kneeling down during the national anthem sidelined the movement. Creating a new divide, which doesn’t exist, cannot heal society. When you pick protesting against sensitive emotions like the National anthem, respecting war heroes, saluting to the flag, you lose the people who are with you but have emotionally charged towards the idea of the nation. It won’t achieve anything but a PR promotion to celebrities, shoe companies and again goes back to a vicious circle of who is right who is wrong. Let’s take the debate further from protesting because protest should serve the purpose but not keep the water boiling. It needs to bring awareness to people, so the mindset can be changed, it cannot create new cracks and become a sanity test for the citizens.

Black Lives Matter should revisit their leadership. Keep aside political inclinations. It’s not about democrat or republican, it’s about humanity and civil liberties. Keep the discussion and narrative on the incident, not the reaction, don’t defend any kind of violence, reject outright, don’t even go into the debate of what is right protest and wrong, don’t give over explanations on “ all lives matter”, stick to the cause. The USA needs Justice for George, justice for Arbery, Justice for Cooper, and Justice for Charleston victims. They all today screaming, “we cant breath”. When you are fighting the mindset, you cannot change without bringing a sense of Unity over the issue. You cannot achieve the righteous society by defending the violent actions or picking the political side. You win when you concentrate on bringing perpetrators and power abusers to justice. When you increase awareness on the loopholes in the justice system when you stop preaching victim hood and start teaching accountability, responsibility, and oneness towards the nation the change will start. It may not be tomorrow, May not be in a few years but at least the next generation will grow without these prejudiced mindsets based on the color of our skins.

Remember the Martin Luther king.

“If we do not learn to live together as friends, we will die apart as fools.”

Black leadership should start uniting all people who feel these inequalities in the society, on the incident, and rebut every debate, which is not on the issue but on the reaction. Distance themselves from this unethical, violent reaction, no excuses for a crime. Whole Kashmiri pandits in India lost their home, family, and dignity 30 years ago but to this day, not one bus was burnt, not one store was looted, not one pandit indulged in riots. They are fighting in the constitutional framework for the justice they deserve. Inspire from them. Talk about George, make society accountable, bring change in mindset, ignore celebrities and their endorsements, be the change.

Work towards a society the MLK dreamed of.

May George soul rest in peace, may this great democracy work and bring those criminals to justice.

Peace.

Is Trump right to take China on?

No matter the world has hundred and one grievances against Donald J Trump, as leader of the free world, for upending the existing world order, it owes a lot to Trump for calling out China as only he can, in the wake of ‘Wuhan Virus’ (as he has called it). Trump must be furious. The US economy was booming. Unemployment rate across the Whites, African-American community, Hispanics and other immigrants was at its lowest. The stock market was on a record high. Donald Trump had trumped and impeached his opponents in their impeachment motion in Ukraine gate. The Robert Mueller Report running to over 400 pages on Russian influence on Trump Campaign in 2016, did not move a needle. Donald J Trump was well poised and positioned to seek re election in Nov, 2020.

Enter the’Wuhan Virus’ or ‘China Virus’ as Trump has defiantly christened it, despite a World Health Organisation diktat. Over one lakh lives have been lost in the United States and nearly 15 lakhs are Covid19 afflicted. The world over, 6 million are affected and 3,73,000 dead, according to Johns Hopkins Hospital data compilation.

While the viral curve is flattening in New York, it is spiking in Wisconsin and Alabama. All 50 States are under the weather with this Pandemic. The booming economy zooming to stratosphere, is suddenly doomed to plunge the depths. 40 million Americans have registered for unemployment dole and notwithstanding the over $2 trillion rescue and recovery package, small businesses are folding like nine pins. Chapter XI Bankruptcy embrace threatens commercial entities, doing well just three months before.

Trump is a worried man. His administration described as ‘chaotic’ by Bob Woodward, he of the Washington Post twin Carl Bernstein of Watergate fame, at the best of times, is now ‘struggling to remain in balance’ as Thomas Friedman puts it. In fact, Trump administration never settled down in the past over three years, as it was a revolving door policy for top positions as Secretary of State, White House Chief of Staff, Secretary of Defence, Press Secretary, with several other critical positions remaining unfilled. There is a new book out ‘Trumpapocalypse’ by David Frum, Staff Writer with The Atlantic, adding to his discomfiture.

In such a scenario, the spread of Viral Pandemic ‘has brought the American economy to its wobbly knees’ as a commentator put it. No wonder, Trump is furious that warts and all, his economy was strong and thunderous and in its backdrop, re election was a given. Now, the democratic ‘would be nominee’ for President, Joe Biden is reported to be leading in national polls, and coming close even in swing States that matter for an electoral college triumph.

Donald J Trump, who was effusive in his praise for Xi Jinping, Chinese premier, ‘my good friend’ for handling the virus, even as late as Jan 24, 2020, has pivoted a full 180 degrees to hold China ‘wholly responsible for this world wide viral spread due to undeniable malfeasance of Chinese authorities’. Chinese assertion of authoritarian instincts over Hong Kong has exacerbated the United States anger and rage. China is aware of the anger and anguish generated by their failure to come clean on the viral spread, as early as possible. They are therefore hell bent on deflecting the world’s attention through intentional border skirmishes with India, instigating Nepal and Pakistan to indulge in pinpricks, activity on South China Sea, needling Taiwan et al. It is typical Chinese tactics to try and take the eye balls from the ‘Wuhan Virus’ devastating deathly dance.

The fact that WHO was perceived to be soft on China, as the present numero uno was their nominee, is not helping either. WHO played ball with initial Chinese view that ‘ it did not show human to human transmission faculties’ as in a WHO tweet, now pulled down, has infuriated Trump no end now. Trump has accused WHO of playing partisan Pandemic politics to mollycoddle China, and has withdrawn contributions to , $450 million (as against China’s measly $40 millions) WHO. China, Trump has pointed out was contributing ten times lesser than US of A but exerting ‘maximum influence of convenience’. Trump has indicated that special trade and currency equations with Hong Kong would now be withdrawn. It is no longer empty rhetoric, for it seems so eerie but real.

It seems that the World’s War of Virus is transforming into a War on China for the spread of the virus. Documentaries on social media on the Deadly Secret of the Coronavirus , including by CNN International, all, have gone viral. The air is thick with China hate and except the most obvious few, including our friendly neighbour Pakistan, no other country is willing to say a good word on China. Australia is on the war path too and the WHO led investigation into the origins of the Virus from Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, spells trouble to China. China has always played smart politics remaining inscrutable and pretty much having their way in international world order. The viral spread has exposed the chinks in the Chinese armoury and their self-aggrandising attitude even over Personal Protective Equipment’ by cornering the export market in January, 2020, has not gone unnoticed.

Trump has gone ballistic. His bellicose utterances are typically reflective of America First retinue. Would he stay the course? Or he has raised a feverish pitch, so that he can negotiate a sweet trade deal with China, just in time for Nov,2020 elections. Who knows? But, for now Trump is leading not America but is seen as the megaphone to make China pay a price, for delayed reporting or suppression of the truth or whatever they are guilty of. The world seems inclined to trumpet the Trumpisms as the despair of death and destruction is overwhelming as China seems unable to wash its hands off the consequences of the viral spread.

While China has literally smashed the viral curve and miraculously confined it to Wuhan, the world is grappling it, all over the place and unable to overcome the economic pitfalls too. The least that China owes, is an apology, if not reparations for their ‘negligence and neglect’, if not anything more sinister. Trump has led the charge and the world seems willing to lend a hand, even if Trump otherwise does not deserve any leg up. It is felt that China has gotten its own way for far too long. Its economy seems to have isolated itself from the calamitous world wide impact and it is quite mysterious in an interdependent and not mere interconnected globalised economy. Is this the Tiananmen moment which fizzled out, morphing into a more impactful Wuhan moment? Has China bitten or spread more than it can chew or contain? Or typically, the two leading economic powerhouses, China and US of A would get together for their own selfish constructs? Or we are at an inflection point when the world at large would at last get together to tell China like it is, as it ought to be? Watch this space.

(Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan- Author is practising advocate in the Madras High Court)

The one way secularism and why tolerance is it’s necessary evil

The intolerance debate suddenly sprouted into the public domain when Amir Khan in an interview quoted his wife suggesting to leave the country amidst the lynching of Akhlaq and award wapsi protests. It was year 2015 and in the past 70 years several such lynchings had occured before and the newly elected regime had recently completed it’s 1 year in power. Ironically, it hadn’t been long since the same intolerant Hindu society had 6 months back bestowed Amir his biggest blockbuster hit PK in which every single ritual of the Hindus was criticised, made fun of and bashed left, right and centre.

Intolerance was a word which before the debates surfaced, I had heard in the context of food products alone. At first, it was bit of a shocker to watch the whole Hindu community being assesed and evaluated with the same word used to evaluate a food disorder such as lactose intolerance. Definitely it took it’s own sweet time for my mind to assimilate the brand new addition to my vocabulary, but soon I got used to it.

To understand Hindu Intolerance and for the sake of gratification let us first understand what actually Lactose Intolerance means? It simply refers to a body condition where our stomach is unable to digest lactose due to the deficiency of right enzymes. It is pretty easy to superimpose this definition upon Hindus as a community. Hindu Intolerance refers to a condition where due the deficiency of right values the Hindus are not able to assimilate Muslims in their society.

The question that arises is that how far does this claim hold true? Because as far as I can remember let alone some another religion, I grew up respecting the several Gods in my own home who were worshipped by different members of my family. But, just a minute, am I not supposed to use the words “I tolerated”?

Actually no, because it is utter nonsensical for someone brought up as Hindu to tolerate, when it comes to other people’s faiths. We intrinsically know and are rather hardwired to respect them. But, at the same time, we commit a blunder, the blunder to expect this respect to be mutual. Because article 25 of the Constitution gives them the freedom to practice their faith and somehow, those who practice it religiously, don’t feel obligated to revert back that repect we expect.

I must confess that initially I wondered why couldn’t the intellectuals come up with something better to assess our society rather than using a word which is characteristic to defining food disorders. Why couldn’t they simply come up with something more sensible like, “Hindu Society lacking mutual respect.”? If you, somehow had the same question sprouting in your mind all this while, I hope, just like me, you must have come to terms with the solution. It’s the same solution Asaddudin Owaisi has been yelling in your heads from TV debates until now. It’s high time we start respecting their right to practice their faith while they disrespect ours as it is their Constitutional Right. So when they say fuck hindutva, or they write khilafat 2.0, or hindu bharat chhodo, we just got to say it out loud, “Nara e taqbir: Allah hu Akabr!“, just so you don’t end up being intolerant.

The politics and commerce of anti-Hindu content in mass media

0

Out of the innumerable quotes that exist in relation to mass media, my favorites are as follows:

  1. People in the mass media tend more and more every day to look and act like elected and appointed officials.“-L. Neil Smith
  2. I operate under the assumption that the mass media will never be accurate. It operates with the objective to simplify and exaggerate, which is exactly what Walt Disney told his cartoonists.“-Michael Crichton

Let us discuss the above quotes briefly with respect to India and the Hindu identity.

The first quote concerns a topic that invites a lot of discussion and/or argument in the society. In what leads to becoming a judgement call on the Hindus of India and worldwide, topics such as intolerance, nationalism, majoritarian politics, Hindutva etc. are deliberated or characterized on mainstream news media, advertising, cinema, television shows, web series, digital platforms etc. on a regular basis. The demonization of Hindus and their culture is always accompanied by the portrayal of honest and bright Muslim characters that almost always happen to be a victim of the majority in India no matter what mode of mass media is concerned. The self-appointed crusaders of justice, democracy and equality at the helm of such mass media organizations seem to (without having being invited to do so by the people of this country) have declared themselves as the protectors of this nation and her Constitution.

In the past few years in India, we have come across an unusual situation where a number of mass media outlets seem to be “two timers” as in one branch of the organization will support the nationalist narrative and the other will support the leftist narrative. One half of the married celebrity couple will seem to be patriotic and a vocal Modi supporter while the other half will create web series that shamelessly portray Hindus as the worst form of demons to have existed on this planet. In what seems like a carefully crafted business strategy, various mass media organizations and celebrities associated with it seem to have mastered the skill of “Dono Hathon mein Laddu Hona”.

Such antics allow various political forces to artificially manufacture their support bases in public leading to utter confusion among the public on issues pertaining to national policy or security and further provide a lucrative opportunity to mass media companies, celebrities etc. to make significant profits. Anti-Hindu content of mass media is, therefore, not only just part of a greater political narrative but also an extremely profitable business model.

The second quote deals with inaccuracy, simplification and exaggeration by the mass media organization especially regarding Hindu mindset. Inaccuracy is often displayed by publishing fake news, changing the religion or caster of characters in a movie, TV show or web series based on real life events, falsification of Indian history produced as content/news and through various other means. Simplification is done by equating certain social evils in Hindu society (social evils exist in all cultures of the world) to a globalist Muslim Ummah movement to create a theocratic society worldwide. It leads to Hindus drawing false equivalence between their culture to cultures that are out to capture and destroy Hindus by calling them inferior, idol worshippers and many other things. It further leads to the greatest fallacy of equating Dharma with religion or mazhab and creating ridiculous cultural hoaxes like Ganga-Jamuni tehzeeb, idea of India etc.

Exaggeration is one of the most common concepts nowadays when we hear debates on intolerance, ghar wapsi, award wapsi, mob lynching etc. Random acts of violence are given the color of communal hatred. And of course mass media organizations never forget to remind us that communal hatred is a trait which is only possessed by the Hindus of this country. What a great opportunity it provides to create fictional content which is nowadays not just part of cinematographic films but also our news.

So now you know that there is a lot of money to be made in commercializing anti-Hindu sentiments in mass media along with gaining several political favors!

कोरोना की यात्रा और कोरोना के बाद की यात्रा

जब शरद ऋतु अपने शिखर पर था, स्कूल – कॉलेज में क्रिसमस और नए साल की छुट्टियां हो गई थी, सब लोग पिकनिक पार्टी में मस्त थे तब उनको इस बात की तनिक भी आभास नहीं थी कि चाइना में इन हँसी खुशी को मिटाने की पटकथा लिखी जा रही हैl कोई Chinese, मानव सभ्यता को तबाह करने के लिऐ चमगादड़ खा रहा थाl

जब चीन की तैयारियां पुरी हो गई तब वह आखिरकार WHO के माध्यम से दुनिया को इस वायरस के बारे में आधी अधुरी जानकारी दे दी लेकिन साल के अन्तिम रात की डीजे के शोर में यह समाचार बहुतों के कानों तक तो पहुंचा पर लोग इसे पहाड़ में खरोंच की भांति नजरअंदाज कर दिए l Corona मरीज की संख्या लगातार बढ़ रही थी और आखिरकार 13 जनवरी को चीन से बाहर थाईलैंड में Corona मरीज की पुष्टी हुई l दुनिया सचेत होती उसके पहले WHO ने ठीक अगले दिन यानि 14 जनवरी को मानव से मानव रोग के प्रसार की संभावना को खारिज कर पहले से बेफिक्र दुनिया को कान में तेल डालकर सोने को निश्चिंत किया ताकि चाइना अपनी असली मकसद जो की दुनिया को तबाह करने की थी उसमें कामयाब हो सकेl

जनवरी के अंत तक भारत, अमेरिका, इंग्लैंड समेत दुनिया के 28 देशों तक इस बीमारी का प्रसार हो गयाl भारत समेत दुनिया के तमाम देश Corona के प्रभावित शहर से अपने नागरिकों को लाना प्रारंभ कर दिएl सभी महत्वपूर्ण हवाईअड्डों पर थर्मल स्क्रीनिंग होने लगी, कई देश चीन और अन्य प्रभावित जगहों की यात्रा पर प्रतिबंध लगा दिएl फरवरी के अंत तक यह रोग पूरी दुनिया में फ़ैल चुका थाl चीन में 3000 मौत के साथ संक्रमितों की संख्या 80000 के करीब पहुंच गयाl दक्षिण कोरिया और ईरान इसका नया केन्द्र तथा अन्य देश में भी यह संख्या दहाई के आंकड़ों के पहुंच गया थाl हम नित्य चीन में सैकड़ों मौत की समाचार सुनने लगे उस समय दुनिया को लगा की चीन तो इस बीमारी से समाप्त होने वाला है पर उन्हें यह पता नहीं था की मार्च से यह Corona दूसरे देशों में मार्च करने वाला है अपने मजबूत अर्थव्यवस्था के नशे में अमेरिका, इंग्लैंड इस महामारी की गंभीरता को भापने में असमर्थ थे उन्हें अपनी अर्थवयवस्था की ज्यादा चिन्ता थी इसलिए वे सभी चीजों को याथवत चलने दिएl

अब कोरोना का असली तांडव शुरू हुआl विकसित देश जिनकी स्वास्थ्य व्यवस्था सबसे उन्नत थी अब अपनी असमर्थता जाहिर करने लगे थे, रोज हजारों लोगों की मौत होने लगी, सभी स्टॉक मार्केट क्रैश करने लगे, अन्ततः इस भागदौड़ भरी दुनिया में एक शिथिलता आयीl बड़े बड़े राजनेता कोरोना से ग्रसित हो गएl सारे स्कूल कॉलेज बन्द हो गए, सड़कें बिरान हो गई, लोगों में डर का आलम इतना हो गया की अगर रास्ते में पैसे भी पड़े दिखे तो लोग छूने से डरने लगें, वातावरण साफ होने लगाl

दुनिया को कोई उपाय नहीं सूझ रही, सभी लोग अंधेरे में तीर चलाने लगे कि HCQ से उपचार सम्भव है तो प्लास्मा थेरेपी सेl Hcq के जरूरत को पूरा करने के लिए अमेरिका समेत कई विकसित देश भारत की ओर उम्मीद की नजर से देखने लगे लेकिन भारत भी वसुधैव कुटुंबकम् की परिचय देते हुए किसी को निराश नहीं किया और दुनिया को बताया की व्यापार में भले ही कोई अग्रणी हो पर व्यवहार में अभी भी हम ही श्रेष्ठ हैंl

भारत में भी कोरोना के मामले बढ़ने लगे वैसे ही कई राज्य तथा फिर देश व्यापी बंदी की घोषणा प्रधानमंत्री द्वारा की गईl सारे संस्थान बन्द हो गए, डॉक्टर सफाईकर्मी प्रशासन सब अपनी जान की बाजी लगाकर अपनी कर्तव्य का पालन कर रहे थे, घुटन के कारण हेलमेट नहीं पहनने वाले युवा भी अब बीना मास्क के नहीं निकल रहे थे, बड़े बड़े सितारे भी आज आम लोगों की भातिं खुद का काम खुद कर रहे हैं, धनाध लोग आर्थिक मदद कर रहे हैं, जिस शादी के मौसम में लोग नए संबंध बनानेवाले वाले थे वहां लोग अपने पहले के संबंधी से दूर घर में दुबके पड़े थे, कई निजी संस्थान य समूह अपने आस के गरीब लोग के खाने की प्रबंध कर रहें थे, कुल मिलकर सबलोग अपनी जिम्मेदारियों का पालन कर रहे थेl माफ कीजिएगा सब नहीं एक तब्लीग़ी जमात वाले भी थे जिनको शायाद ये लगता था कि ये बीमारी तो बस काफिरों के लिए बना है य हो सकता है वो उन मानव बॉम्ब बन के इस मौके का लाभ उठाकर पहले के बड़े बड़े आतंकी समूहों द्वारा अधूरे पड़े काम को पूरा करने के लिए लग गए होl तभी तो जहां पुरा देश corona वॉरियर्स पर फुल बरसाकर सम्मान कर रहे थे वहां ये लोग संक्रमण को बढ़ाने के लिए इधर उधर थूकने लगे, जांच के लिए गए डॉक्टर लोग पर जानलेवा हमला करने लगें और इसका परिणाम हुआ कि उस समय होने वाले नए मामले में 30% से भी ज्यादा की योगदान हो गईl

लेकिन इन सबके बावजूद भारत में दुनिया के 17% आबादी के साथ अन्य चुनौतियों के बावजूद अभी तक के अपने सामूहिक प्रयास के बदौलत आज कुल पॉजिटिव केस का मात्र 2-3% और कुल मौत का 1.35% पर सीमित रखा हैl अब भारत पर टिप्पणी करने वाले इंग्लैंड के अर्थशास्त्री Jim O’ Neill को भारत और उनके अपने देश की हालत देख कर ये अंदाजा हो गया होगा कि सबकुछ पैसा से ही नहीं होता कुछ नेतृत्व पर भी निर्भर करता हैl चाहे समय पर यात्रा प्रतिबन्ध हो या lockdown या गरीब लोगों के अकाउंट में डीबीटी के माध्यम से पैसा भेजना अभी तक के सभी निर्णय सही साबित हुए हैंl अब अमेरिका, जापान जैसे कई देश जब ये षडयंत्र को समझे की आखिर वुहान से शुरू होकर ये बीमारी तमाम देशों में तांडव मचा दिया तो आखिर चीन के दूसरे प्रांत में ऐसा क्यों नहीं हुआ तब वो लोग अपने कंपनी को वहां से शिफ्ट करने की तैयारियां शुरू कर रहें हैं। भारत को इस अवसर का लाभ मिल सकता हैl

सकारात्मक खबर के बावजूद अभी भी कई चुनौतियां बना हुआ है जैसे-अप्रवासी मजदूर के समुचित खाने की व्यवस्था, बन्द पड़े शिक्षण संस्थान में पढ़ाई शुरू करने की चुनौती, कोरॉना के बाद अर्थवयवस्था के पुनरुद्धार की चुनौती, साथ वैक्सीन बनने की चुनौती, भविष्य में प्रसार रोकते हुए जनजीवन सामान्य बनाने की चुनौतीl

लोग 1920 के दशक में आए स्पॅनिश फ्लू के बारे में सोचकर ही सहम जा रहें हैं जो कि दुनिया में करोड़ों जान ले लिया थाl 3.9 लाख मौत और 62 लाख से ज्यादा लोगों के संक्रमण के बावजूद अभी भी दुनिया उस अंधेरे बहुमुखी सुरंग में फंसा है जिसमें यह नहीं पता की किस दिशा में जाने पर और कितनी दूर जाने पर यह वैक्सीन रूपी दीपक मिलेगा जिससे इस पूरी दुनिया को उस अंधेरे से बाहर निकाला जा सकेl

The one difference between the Congress of today and that of before 2014

She was super confident that he would never say agree to her proposal. She knew it in her heart that he would say no. But to her utter shock, not only did he say yes, but he also said the five magical words “yes, send us the list.”

I have never seen a political narrative getting punctured by a single sentence with mere five words. Have you? And if you think this was not a failed attempt to politicize a crisis, you don’t have to believe me just go through their own MLA who calls it a cruel joke or you could also refer to the article written by their own promoters like The Print; of course the portal will call it a goof-up caused by one of Priyanka Gandhi’s aide. Its never their fault, its always someone else’s but if it would have gone through it would have been their accomplishment.

But even if Yogi Adityanath had failed to call the bluff, how long would the party be able to politicize this migrant crisis? This strategy is short lived and can only be employed till the crisis exists. Look at what happened when the opposition parties tried to exploit the inconvenience caused by Demonetization. Its exactly the same, Mr. Gandhi was found standing in the ATM queues fetching four thousand and now he is found sitting with the migrants on roadside.

In fact the memes are also on the similar lines, last time he was made fun of his costly jacket, this time his shoes. Everything is exactly the same, as if the same stencil was used to draw the strategy. Be it MSME, or small businesses or poor people, or country’s GDP growth so on and so forth.

Don’t you think it is a bit weird for India’s oldest party who put the entire weight behind Mrs Vadra and still looked like a dwarf in front of a Chief Minister? I mean BJP’s national leadership did not even participate in this political tug of war. How did such a party rule India for decades? This article will provide you with the answer to this very question. How did Indian National Congress, who has been behaving like a headless chicken with no strategy in place whatsoever, rule India for so long? What has changed?

Ever since I started writing politics, I started reading politics, and a lot of it. I have been reading books, articles, journals, written by authors associated with various political parties, ideologies and of course various reports published by different government institutions. I have been referring to these sources and have quoted them in my articles. No matter which book I read, there was one thing in common in all of them. The answer to the above question was always in front of my eyes but I just didn’t connect the dots so far. I am pretty sure, if you don’t already know that, you would say “that’s so true”; at least that’s what I said once I understand the underlying modus operandi.

Let me ask you a simple question. When was the last time a non-congress party was in majority before 2014? Or in other words, when was the last time Congress was competing with a ruling political party as big as itself let alone bigger?

The answer is NEVER.

As soon as India got its independence, Congress came to power. The party has been since then using brute force that comes as a byproduct with the government of an independent country and its various institutions to incapacitate, suppress and eliminate opposition parties. The party never let healthy opposition survive. A healthy opposition means a healthy competition.

Let me give you some examples starting from the 1950s:

Do you know when was the first booth captured? By whom? And in which constituency? I used to think that these kinds of acts were orchastrated by some regional, smaller party or a party of goons. Since, Congress was occupying most of the space, these smaller parties might have wanted a place in the political sphere by using a shortcut. But I was wrong. It was Begusarai constituency in Bihar in late fifties and early sixties. Congress had prepped up Kamdev Singh to counter Communists and tried to win the election by threatening and intimidating Yadavs, maybe this is the reason why we see a Yadav vote bank today in UP and Bihar. Congress is in reality the mother of all miseries. You can find this instance and many like this in the book “When Crime Pays ” by Milan Vaishnav.

Muscle power is not the only thing that Congress used to crush the opposition. There was a political party that went by the name Swatantra Party (a party formed by some INC leaders who were tired of Nehru’s dominance). Although the party was in its nascent stages but was growing rapidly. It managed 6% votes and 18 seats in its first LS election and 8% votes and 44 seats in his second LS elections i.e. as many seats Congress got in 2014. The ruling congress was threatened by its growth. What did it do? Indira Gandhi made corporate funding illegal in 1969 and cut the source of funds for Swatantra Party. But if it cut the funds for one party, it cut the funds for ruling party too. So how was Congress generating funds to use during and before elections after the implementation of these acts? By inventing “briefcase politics“ welcome to the world of black money. “You need a license to something, bring a couple of briefcases“, “you need government’s approval to expand the production, bring these many briefcases.” I wrote a complete article on this, you could have a look at The Cash Nexus: Criminals and Politics. I have also mentioned all the sources I used in the article. A clear cut case of using administrative powers to manipulate/control elections.

Moving on to the early 70s. Indira Gandhi started using RAW for her on political benefits. The officers were used to keep tabs on certain politicians. There is book that goes by the name “The Kaoboys of R&AW: Down Memory Lane” by B. Raman. The book refers to instances like “I myself when posted in Paris got an instruction from the headquarter to dig out/track the where about of Mrs Leila Kabir, wife of late Mr. George Fernandes.” It gives not one but many instances where both Indira Gandhi and her son Rajiv Gandhi used RAW for their own political electoral benefits. I wrote a complete article on exploitation of RAW by Indira Gandhi and later Rajiv Gandhi, you can have a look at: Your Karma awaits you!

Moving ahead a few years, Congress was still facing issues retaining the power. What did th party do next? Stuff all the opposition leaders in jail, as simple as that. If there won’t be anybody outside, who will win? Emergency! Emergency! Easy peasy! Brutal use of power. Break the back bones of relatively bigger parties. Hundred small parties together can’t compete with a big party, not then and not now. They can only create a mess.

As an when the opposition was increasing political parties like BJP had started getting some traction, got some foot hold in some parts on India, the government was busy inventing novice ideas to avoid healthy competition and crush them. I can keep going, infact there can be a complete book written showcasing the tactics Congress used so as to never come in a position where it had to complete with any political party as big as itself let alone bigger. But I will quickly mention a few shining ones:

  • In 1993, MPLADS was introduced, it was like paying a bribe of Rs 2,00,000/- every year to every MP to stay in power and keep the status quo as-is. It was a strategy to retain the support of MPs, MLAs and MLCs who otherwise would have pulled their support. I recently wrote an article about MPLADS, you could have a look here: MPLADS; How Congress legalized corruption!
  • Ministry of Minority affairs was established in the same period. There is no constitutional basis of the ministry, the constitution does not even give a definition to the term Minority. It was a brilliant tactic to remain in power by appeasing one specific community that votes as one.
  • Other than for untouchable class, there weren’t caste based reservations. OBC reservations was another brilliant tactic to stay in power. You could technically add anything in “others” as per your convenience, can’t you? Increasing the quotas at different times is just an extension of the above mentioned strategy to remain in power. Be it by increasing the quotas in 2008-09 or adding Muslim reservation quota in OBC category in 2011-12. You should definitely read an old article of mine When or How does a child become “caste-literate”? and the recent one The case of Wakfs and Economic status of Indian Muslims
  • Or the populist actions like making the exams optional in 2009 in the name of RTE act. Please do read A Right to Unemployment for some more details about it.

All of these are the actions that only a government can take, and all of these are actions that win elections at the cost of nation’s well being. You pick a large group of people be it a caste, community or religion, and award them freebies, unfair advantage over others, who are they going to vote? And when the other left out communities and groups protest, tag them on the main opposition party.

The only difference between the Congress of that time and today’s time is that it isn’t able to use the institutions the way it wants. Congress does not know how to compete with a political party without an upper hand. If you think that Rahul Gandhi is a weak leader and Pt Nehru and Indira Gandhi were strong, Rahul Gandhi along with all of his forefathers i.e. Gandhis of the Nehru Dynasty never had to wrestle power away from a party as big as their own. They all are exactly the same with the same intellect, same IQ, same EQ, same political acumen. Don’t you ever forget that Indira Gandhi was called a “goongi gudiya“(mute doll). As soon as that “goongi gudiya” got power, she ripped apart the vocal chords of everyone and anyone that came in her way and made them mute. God forbid if Congress with Nehru-Gandhi family at the helm comes in the power again, it will happen in the exact same way. This person who you think as a mere joke, this “pappu” would literally make a dhol out of you and play beats on that, even before you would realize, what happened.

In the current form Congress is just creating circumstances and waiting for BJP to succumb to the artificial pressure and make a mistake. Bookmark this, as soon as BJP loses one General Election, there won’t be another to look up to. For the sake of the future generations, for the sake of our children, please read more books about how Congress had been ruling the country and be aware of the dangers. If you agree to this article please-please do share the content as much as possible. Unless people know the truth, they will keep on making the same mistakes again and again.

Thanks for reading!!!

Also read: Misconstrued Opposition; A flawed democracy that needs fixing

How to tackle the migrants issue

0

I am sure by now on every whatsapp group you are part of, you would have received many forwards about how the migrants are being affected by the pandemic and how we should all collectively hang our heads in shame. I did and that set me thinking.

And I ask you why? Why the hurry to ascribe something that the state/government failed at to an individual shame? I mean, why should I feel ashamed?

Did I not pay taxes? Did I not pay salary to those whom I employed? Did I not donate to worthy causes? Did I cheat migrants? This is an easy way to deflect from the main problem that – as a state – as a country we do not have a system. Be it Delhi or Mumbai or any other city. We don’t have any social security net (it is taking shape now), we have no way of documentation (remember kagaz nahi dikhayenge).

The right response is a system to document migrants in each city. And identify those who are mooching off the system – illegals – throw them out. In the meantime using an identifier, ensure that when we announce and release benefits – it lands in the right bank accounts of those who deserve it and not their middlemen who live to take their undeserving cut (in this case atleast).

And when an NRC (A National Register of Citizens) was mentioned (of course, not a whimper when Congress wanted to bring this up years ago), a select set of people actually opposed it and want more undocumented refugees from Bangladesh and Burma to add to this mess. But say that and the left will be up in arms. Kagaz nahi dikhayenge. To bhugto.

Because the state has no way to estimate how many people are there in which place. No clue. And how do they expect to estimate this in the absence of any reliable data? For a one time, first time in many generations episode? It is just not possible. But if this should not repeat, we need credible data.

Therefore, the right response to all this is a National Register of Citizens that ensures that we know who is here (and where) with identifiers, bank accounts and details so that they can receive the benefits the government shares from time to time, pandemic or no pandemic.

But good luck with that.

So the next time you get one of those guilt tripping, laden with shame forwards ending very sweetly with “Please forward to many people and share this message”, send this instead. And watch…

समीक्षा: प्रेमचंद की छिपी हुई कहानी ‘जिहाद’ की

0

भारत में हर कोई लगभग दस-बारह वर्ष की आयु तक मुंशी प्रेमचंद की कोई न कोई कहानी अवश्य पढ़ चुका होता है। जो प्रदेश हिन्दी भाषाभाषी नहीं हैं वहाँ भी अनुवाद के माध्यम से प्रेमचंद कहानी की दुनिया में प्रवेश कर ही जाते हैं। मुंशीजी की मृत्यु 1936 में हुई। अपने जीवनकल में उन्होंने लगभग तीन सौ कहानियों से हिन्दी साहित्य को विभूषित किया। परंतु यहाँ चर्चा मुंशी प्रेमचंद की उस कहानी की करेंगे जो लोगों की पहुँच से दूर रखी जाती है। कहानी का नाम है-‘जिहाद’। यदि पाठकों ने कहानी न पढ़ी हो तो समीक्षा पढ़ने से पूर्व चार-पाँच मिनट मे लिंक में दी हुई कहानी पढ़ लें अन्यथा कहानी के बिना समीक्षा का कोई अर्थ नहीं रह जाता।

आज से लगभग सौ साल पहले लिखी गई इस कहानी का कथानक कुछ ऐसा है-

पश्चिमोत्तर (तत्कालीन भारत अफगानिस्तान सीमा और वर्तमान पाकिस्तान-अफगानिस्तान सीमा) के एक गाँव से जान बचाकर भागता हुआ एक हिन्दू समूह है। जिनका पीछा मजहबी उन्माद में सने हुए वो मुसलमान कर रहे हैं जो सदियों से उनके साथ रहते आए थे। उद्देश्य है इनकी हत्या या धर्मांतरण। उनके मंदिर तोड़ दिए गए हैं। संपत्ति पर मुसलमानों ने अधिकार कर लिया है।

इस भागते हुए समूह में धर्मदास और खजानचंद नाम के दो युवा हैं जो श्यामा से प्रेम करते हैं। श्यामा की बुआ उसका विवाह खजानचंद से करना चाहती है परंतु उसकी प्रेमदृष्टि का पात्र धर्मदास है।

रास्ते में इन पर धर्मांध मुसलमानों का हमला होता है। पहले धर्मदास उनके हाथ लगता है जो तलवार के डर के कारण इस्लाम स्वीकार कर लेता है। खजानचंद लड़ता हुआ दो पठानों को मार गिराता है परंतु अंततः पकड़ लिया जाता है। आत्मगौरव, निजधर्म के सम्मान में वह मुसलमान हो जाने के स्थान पर मृत्यु को वरीयता देता है और जिहादियों के हाथों मारा जाता है। यही प्रेम त्रिकोण का टर्निंग पॉइंट बनता है। हिन्दू धर्म का महात्मय और स्वत्व की गूढ़ता समझने वाली वाली श्यामा खजानचंद के मृत शरीर को रीढ़विहीन धर्मदास से अधिक प्रेम योग्य मानती है। कुछ कृत्रिम नाटकीयता के बाद अंततः धर्मदास अपमानित होकर आत्महत्या कर लेता है।

कथानक बहुत ही सहज और मर्मस्पर्शी है। प्रेम-त्रिकोण के माध्यम से सहस्राब्दी लंबे वीभत्स यथार्थ का अंकन है।

न जाने कितने खजानचंदों की हत्याएं निरंतर होती रही हैं। वास्तविक श्यामाएं या तो अपमान के नारकीय जीवन को विवश हुई है या जौहर व्रत का पालन करने को। धर्मदास अपना धर्मत्याग अरबी नाम धारण कर के पठान की भूमिका आ रहे हैं। अपनी कुंठा और हीनभावना को छिपाने के लिए वो अब बचे हुए काफिरों को भी अपने जैसा कुंठित बनाने में लगे हुए हैं।

यदि ‘पश्चिमोत्तर’ की जगह लाहौर, ढाका या कराची कर दें और ‘रावलपिंडी’ के स्थान पर दिल्ली, कलकत्ता या अमृतसर तो कहानी 1947 की हो जाएगी। अगर पश्चिमोत्तर को कश्मीर घाटी कर दिया जाए और रावलपिंडी की ओर भागते हिन्दू अगर किसी तरह जवाहर सुरंग पार कर जम्मू की ओर भागने लगें तो यही कहानी 1989-1990 की हो जाएगी।

बस हिंदुओं की भूमि सिकुड़ती जा रही है।

इस कहानी में रावलपिंडी सुरक्षित स्थान है जो 20 वर्ष बाद ही इस्लामिक आतंकवाद का गढ़ हो जाता है। ऐसा नहीं है कि पश्चिमोत्तर कभी सुरक्षित नहीं था। कभी वो भारत के सर्वाधिक समृद्ध विश्वविद्यालय तक्षशिला के कारण विख्यात था। गांधार शैली की मूर्तिकला का जन्मस्थल था। वर्तमान में जिसे पाकिस्तान और बांग्लादेश कहते हैं उस स्थान पर हिंदुओं का हाल भी यही होगा ये तो यह कहानी लिखते हुए मुंशीजी ने स्वयं भी नहीं सोचा होगा। जावा, सुमात्रा, बोर्नियो, मलय सभी जगह इसी कहानी का वास्तविक रूप रहे होंगे। बस हिन्दू भाग रहे हैं। असहाय। निर्वीर्य्य।

वर्तमान भी यही है। उत्तर प्रदेश के कैराना या हरियाणा के मेवात में लगी ‘यह संपत्ति बिकाऊ है’ की पट्टिकाएं सभी ने देखी ही हैं। बंगाल, बिहार, तेलंगाना और केरल के मुर्शिदाबाद, मालदा, उत्तर दिजनापुर, किशनगंज, मलप्पुरम जैसे कई जनपद यही कहानी कह रहे हैं।

कारण वही था, वही है- जिहाद।

प्रेमचंद ने भारत द्वारा पिछले हजार वर्षों से झेली जा रही विभीषिका को क्षोभ के साथ उकेरा है।

परंतु कथानक लेखकीय हस्तक्षेप से मुक्त नहीं है।

खजानचंद की मृत्यु पर श्यामा के विलाप के बाद पठानों का हृदय परिवर्तन दिखाया गया है। वे खजानचंद के अंतिम संस्कार में श्यामा की सहायता करते हैं। धर्मदास के अतिरिक्त सभी हिंदुओं को बिना धर्मपरिवर्तन ससम्मान वापस अपने गाँव ले जाने का वचन देते हैं।

काफिरों की हत्या को जन्नत का मार्ग और काफिरों की महिलाओं को ‘माल-ए-गनीमत’ का हिस्सा मानने वाले तथा हूरों से संसर्ग की चाह में अंधे जिहादियों से ऐसी अपेक्षा किसी भी जानकार व्यक्ति के गले नहीं उतरती। कश्मीर में गिरिजा टिक्कू के साथ हुई क्रूरता से लेकर इस्लामिक स्टेट के आतंकियों द्वारा यजीदी बच्चियों के साथ दिन में पचास-पचास बार की गई जघन्यता जैसे लाखों उदाहरण इतिहास में बिखरे पड़े हैं।

इस कहानी के लेखनकाल के समकालीन ही लें। ऐसा नहीं हुआ होगा कि खिलाफत आंदोलन के नाम पर मालाबार मे मुस्लिम मोपलाओं के द्वारा हिंदुओं की नृशंस हत्याओं और महिलाओं के सामूहिक शीलभंग का बर्बर रूप मुंशीजी की दृष्टि से छुपा रह गया हो।

परंतु प्रेमचंद पर महात्मा गांधी के ‘हृदय परिवर्तन द्वारा समाज सुधार’ के आदर्श का प्रभाव था।

वस्तुतः कहानी स्वाभाविक तब होती जब खजानचंद की हत्या के बाद पठान उसके शव को क्षत-विक्षत कर उसी जगह श्यामा के साथ बलात्कार करते और उसे ले जाकर काबुल की किसी बाजार में बेच देते। साथ ही बाकी सभी हिन्दू या तो मार दिए जाते या मुसलमान हो जाते। ऐसी स्थति को धर्मदास की आत्महत्या के लिए कहानी में पर्याप्त परिस्थितियों का जुटाव माना जाता।

दूसरा विकल्प यह हो सकता था कि खजानचंद की मृत्यु के बाद श्यामा की धर्मपरायणता देखकर हिंदुओं के रक्त में उबाल आता और धर्मदास व अन्य लोग मिलकर पठानों को मार गिराते। 

परंतु ऐसा कुछ भी कहानी में नहीं दिखता।

‘सद्गति’ कहानी में ब्राह्मणों के एक शोषक भाग की निष्ठुरता का उद्घाटन करने की राह में समस्त ब्राह्मणों को शोषक-समाज के रंग से रंगने वाली उनकी लेखनी जिहादियों की बर्बरता, उन्माद और आतताई प्रवृत्ति की नग्नता प्रदर्शित करने में तनिक कुंठित होती दिखाई देती है।

अतः कथानक का एक छोटा भाग लेखक के प्रभाव से प्रेरित दिखाई देता है।

फिर भी सदैव ‘पंच परमेश्वर’ जैसे सांप्रदायिक सौहार्द के मंत्र को ही प्रसारित करने वाले मुंशीजी की ‘जिहाद’ की विशेषता यही है कि इस कहानी में उन्होंने इस्लामिक कट्टरता के नग्न यथार्थ को निर्दयता से प्रकाशित किया है। (वर्तमान में ट्विटर की भाषा में कहें तो वह राहुल ईश्वर की कृत्रिमता से निकलकर राहुल रौशन की वास्तविकता को गृहण कर रहे हैं।)

कथावस्तु में आरंभ, विकास (धर्मदास-खजानचंद संवाद), कौतूहल (जिहादियों का आक्रमण), चरम (खजानचंद की हत्या) और अंत (धर्मदास की आत्महत्या) की अवस्थाओं को देखा जा सकता है। संक्षिप्तता के गुण को धारण करते हुए भी इन सभी चरणों का पाया जाना एक दुष्कर कार्य है। यह कहानीकार की साहित्यिक उपलब्धि है।

‘जिहाद’ मे मुख्यतः तीन ही चरित्र हैं। धर्मदास, श्यामा और खजानचंद। पठानों की कृत्रिमता के अतिरिक्त पात्र परिस्थिति के अनुसार व्यवहार करते है। धर्मदास मे इस्लाम स्वीकारने से पहले द्वंद दिखाई देता है, शेष दोनों चरित्र संकल्पित प्रतीत होते हैं। चरित्र अपने क्रियाकलापों से अपने स्वरूप का विकास करते हैं।

प्रेमचंद के चरित्रों के नामकरण विशेष होते हैं। नाम चरित्र के मनोविज्ञान को समझने में सहायता करते हैं। व्यक्तिगत और सामूहिक मनोविज्ञान को चरित्र से ढूंढ निकालने की कला मुंशीजी में अद्भुत है।

धर्मदास का नाम के साथ कॉन्ट्रास्ट दिखाया गया है। एक समय तो यह ‘लंबा, गठीला, रूपवान’ व्यक्तिएक दर्जन भी आ जाएं तो भूनकर रख दूं’ की डींगें हांक रहा होता है परंतु परिस्थिति आने पर झटपट आत्मसमर्पण कर देता है। खजानचंद नाम के अनुसार धनाढ्य है। परंतु ‘दुबला-पतला, रूपहीन-सा’ यह युवक स्वाभिमान रूपी धन का भी खजांची निकलता है। ‘कितनी ही बार धर्मदास के हाथों वह पराजित हो चुका था’ परंतु अंततः श्यामा के प्रेम का वह अधिकारी बनता है।

‘श्यामा’ नाम सम्मोहक है। सोचते ही एक साँवली-सलोनी युवती का चित्र मस्तिष्क में उभरता है जिसके नैन-नक्श आकर्षक हैं, माथे पर केशों की लटें बिखरी हैं। जो साड़ी के पल्लू को को कमर लगाए हुए उलटे हाथ से पसीने की बूंदें पोछ रही है। जिसमे गंभीरता है, गरिमा है और शिशुता भी। और संभवतः वह भगवान कृष्ण की आराधिका भी हो। आप जिस पर मोहित भी हो सकते हैं और श्रद्धावश उसे साष्टांग प्रणाम करने का भी मन करता है। 

श्यामा का चरित्र भी सर्वाधिक सशक्त हो कर निखरा है। उसको प्रेम धर्मदास से है लेकिन पठानों से गले मिलते देख वो खजानचंद से कहती है- “मैं चाहती हूं, पहला निशाना धर्मदास ही पर पड़े। कायर! निर्लज्ज! प्राणों के लिए धर्म त्याग किया। ऐसी बेहयाई की जिंदगी से मर जाना कहीं अच्छा है।“

त्वरित निर्णय लेने की शक्ति है उसमे। नीर-क्षीर विवेकी तो इतनी है कि वह दुरूह स्थिति में भी आदर्श व्यक्ति का वरण करती है। क्योंकि ‘यह धर्म पर मरने वाला वीर था, धर्म को बेचने वाला कायर नहीं’

वैचारिक स्पष्टता स्तर तो इसी पंक्ति से पता चलता है जब वह धर्मदास से कहती है- “तुम्हारे पास वह खजाना था, जो तुम्हें आज कई लाख वर्ष हुए ऋषियों ने प्रदान किया था। जिसकी रक्षा रघु और मनु, राम और कृष्ण, बुद्ध और शंकर, शिवाजी और गोविंद सिंह ने की थी। उस अमूल्य भंडार को आज तुमने तुच्छ प्राणों के लिए खो दिया।“

प्रभाव इतना है कि पूरे कथानक का रुख मोड़ दे। यहाँ तक की नंगी तलवार ताने जिहादियों के हृदय परिवर्तन जैसा ‘न भूतों न भविष्यतो’ कार्य भी करवा दे। कायर के मन में इतनी आत्मग्लानि का भाव दे दे कि उसे आत्महत्या के अतिरिक्त कोई विकल्प न बचे। 

भारतीय समाज का धुरी महिलाएं ही हैं। वो प्रेरक हैं, संबलदात्री हैं, मार्गदर्शक हैं, पालक हैं। पुरुष सहायक की भूमिका में हैं। जो आर्थिक, युद्धक अथवा राजनीतिक कार्य करते दिखाई देते हैं। पर समाज का मेरुदंड महिलाएं ही हैं। अगर शिवाजी महाराज चौदह वर्ष की आयु में विजय यात्रा का आरंभ करते हैं तो कारण माँ जीजाबाई हैं और कोई नहीं।

श्यामा उस परंपरा की वाहिका है जिस परंपरा को देवी अहिल्याबाई होल्कर, रानी नाइकी देवी, रानी पद्मिनी और रानी लक्ष्मीबाई ने गौरंवान्वित किया है।

कहानी के चरित्र मुंशी प्रेमचंद की उपलब्धि हैं जो सीमित पृष्ठों मे असीमित भावों को समेटे हुए हैं।

देश-काल का वर्णन पर्याप्त है। पश्चिमोत्तर और रावलपिंडी के उल्लेख से स्थान का पता चलता है। कड़कड़ाती धूप, प्यास, बच्चों द्वारा रूदन रोकने, वृक्षहीन बीहड़ रास्तों और तलवारों के साथ काफ़िर-काफ़िर के नारों से वातावरण काफिरों के लिए भयानक होने की सूचना देता है।

यदि पिछले महीने मे काबुल के गुरुद्वारे में बम से मारे गए सिखों की चीत्कार सुने तो पता चलता है आज भी वातावरण वैसा ही है। जहां गुरुद्वारे में मारे गए लोगों का अंतिम संस्कार कर रहे परिजनों को भी बम से हमला कर के मार दिया जाता है।

कहानी के संवाद लघु एवं प्रभवोत्पादक हैं। चरित्र उद्घाटक हैं। कहानी के प्रवाह को बढ़ाते हैं। भावनाओं का सहेजने और वातावरण की सघनता बढ़ाने में सक्षम है। पठानों के संवादों से यदि सामने नाचती मृत्यु का भय जागृत होता है तो श्यामा के ओजपूर्ण संवादों से इस भय पर विजय की इच्छा। यदि दृश्य-विधान, संवाद और चरित्र-संकेत की दृष्टि से देखें तो ‘जिहाद’ का नाट्य रूपांतरण अत्यंत सहजता से हो सकता है। यह मुंशीजी की लेखनी का अनन्य कौशल है। 

धर्मदास से संवाद में पठान कहते है- “मजहब को अक्ल से कोई वास्ता नहीं” तो दो पृष्ठ के बाद खजानचंद जिहादियों को उत्तर देता है- “मैं उस धर्म को मानता हूँ, जिसकी बुनियाद अक्ल पर है।“ इससे स्पष्ट होता है कि संवाद अलग-अलग होकर भी ऐसे बुने गए हैं की उनमें जुड़ाव स्पष्ट दिखता है।

भाषा-शैली की यदि बात की जाए तो अरबी-फारसी के शब्दों की अधिकता वाली हिन्दी उनकी प्रिय है। इसी को गांधीजी ‘हिन्दुस्तानी’ कहते थे। प्रेमचंद की शिक्षा स्वयं एक मदरसे में हुई थी। उनकी प्रारम्भिक रचनाएं उर्दू में थीं। बाद की भी कई रचनाएं मूलतः उर्दू में लिखी गईं एवं उनका प्रकाशन हिन्दी में हुआ। ‘रानी सारंधा’ जैसी कुछ संस्कृतनिष्ट रचनाओं को छोड़कर उनका लेखन हिन्दुस्तानी शैली का ही रहा है। कथाजगत में मुंशी जी इस शैली के और यह शैली मुंशीजी की पहचान बन गई।

‘जिहाद’ में यथास्थान तत्सम शब्दों का भी विद्वतापूर्ण प्रयोग हुआ है। विशेषतः हिन्दू धर्म के गौरवांकन के स्थानों पर। खजानचंद की गर्दन पर जब जिहादी तलवारें तानते है तब उसकी निर्भयता पर मुंशीजी लिखते हैं- “ख़ज़ानचंद का मुखमंडल विलक्षण तेज से आलोकित हो उठा। उसकी दोनों आँखें स्वर्गीय ज्योति से चमकने लगीं।”

वहीं जब अंत में धर्मदास भागकर श्यामा की चौखट पर पहुंचता है तब वह दुत्कारते हुए कहती है- “मैं उस धर्मवीर की ब्याहता हूँ, जिसने हिंदू-जाति का मुख उज्ज्वल किया है। तुम समझते हो कि वह मर गया ! यह तुम्हारा भ्रम है। वह अमर है। मैं इस समय भी उसे स्वर्ग में बैठा देख रही हूँ।“

भाषा कहीं-कहीं काव्यमय होती दिखती है। जहाँ उपमाओं का प्रयोग है तो दृश्य और श्रव्य बिम्ब की सघनता भी। एक उदाहरण अवलोकनीय है- “वृक्षों की कांपती हुई पत्तियों से सरसराहट की आवाज निकल रही थी, मानो कोई वियोगी आत्मा पत्तियों पर बैठी हुई सिसकियां भर रही हो।

जहर का घूंट पीना’, ‘आंखों में अंधेरा छाना’ जैसे मुहावरों से पाठक को बांध लेना तो प्रेमचंद का जादू है ही।

प्रेमचंद की भाषा की एक अन्य विशेषता है- सूत्र-भाषा का प्रयोग।  सूत्र वाक्य किसी भी गद्य के वो वाक्य होते हैं जो उसकी अहम कड़ी होते हुए भी उस गद्य से अलग अपना स्वतंत्र अस्तित्व भी रखते हैं। प्रेमचंद लिखते हैं कि ‘हिंदू संख्या में कम हैं, असंगठित हैं; बिखरे हुए हैं, इस नयी परिस्थिति के लिए बिलकुल तैयार नहीं’

यह सूत्र-वाक्य कहानी का भाग मात्र नहीं है। एक चिरकालिक सत्य है। जहाँ संगठित मजहबों के धर्मांध भारत की पुण्य-भूमि छेंके जा रहे हैं वहीं अधिकतर हिंदुओं को वस्तुस्थिति का भान भी नहीं है। अगर 1945 में कराची के किसी हिन्दू से बोलते कि तुमको यहाँ से भागना पड़ सकता है तो वो तुम्हारा मजाक उड़ाता। अगर 1985 मे किसी कश्मीरी हिन्दू से कहते कि तुम अपने इस वैभव से दूर दिल्ली के नालों के किनारे टेंट में रहोगे तो वो तुमको सांप्रदायिक कहता। और यह हाल अभी भी है। सभी शुतुरमुर्ग बने हुए हैं।

उद्देश्य की बात करने से पहले प्रेमचंद का दृष्टिकोण जानना आवश्यक है। लाहौर के मासिक-पत्र ‘नौरंगे ख्याल’ के संपादक से उन्होंने कहा था- “मेरी कहानियाँ प्रायः किसी न किसी प्रेरणा या अनुभव पर आधारित होती हैं। इसमे मैं नाटकीय रंग भरने की कोशिश करता हूँ। मैं कहानी में किसी दार्शनिक या भावात्मक लक्ष्य को दिखाना चाहता हूँ। जब तक इस प्रकार का कोई आधार नहीं होता, मेरी कलम नहीं उठती।“

जिहाद वैसे भी स्पष्ट रूप से एक सोद्देश्य कहानी दिखाई पड़ती है। जहाँ न सिर्फ प्रेमचंद मृत्यु को धर्मांतरण से उच्च स्थान देकर हिन्दू समाज में उत्साह भरने का कार्य कर रहे हैं। श्यामा और खजानचंद के वाक्यों से हिन्दू जीवन मूल्यों को स्थापित कर रहे हैं। साथ ही जिहाद, कुफ्र, ईमान, जन्नत, हूर, फरिस्ते, सवाब आदि शब्दों मे निहित घृणा को भी उजागर कर रहे हैं। प्रेमचंद उद्घोष करते हैं कि ’ हिंदू को अपने ईश्वर तक पहुंचने के लिए किसी नबी, वली या पैगम्बर की जरूरत नहीं!

उनके उद्देश्य की स्पष्ट प्रतिध्वनि कहानी मे है। इसी कारण साहित्यिक संगठनों और प्रकाशन समूहों पर कुंडली मार के बैठे वामपंथियों ने इस कहानी को लोगों से छिपाकर रखने का प्रयास किया है। ‘प्रेमचंद की सर्वश्रेष्ठ कहानियाँ’ नामक किसी भी संकलन में आप ‘जिहाद’ को नहीं पाएंगे।

समस्या के साथ मुंशी प्रेमचंद समाधान पक्ष को भी प्रदर्शित करते हुए चलते हैं। भागने की एक सीमा होती है। और समस्या से भागना विकल्प होता ही नहीं है। संघर्ष ही विकल्प है। धर्म बेचकर जीने वाला कायर कहलाया जाएगा। स्त्रियाँ श्यामा के रूप में पथ प्रदर्शक हैं। प्रेमचंद कुरुक्षेत्र के भगवान कृष्ण बन कर ‘हतो वा प्राप्स्यसि स्वर्गं जित्वा वा भोक्ष्यसे महीम्’ की प्रेरणा दे रहे हैं।

समग्रतः ‘जिहाद’ समय को जीत सर्वकालिक कहानी बनती है। यह समस्या-समाधान द्वय को प्रस्तुत करती है। नारी के आदर्श रूप की प्रस्तुति देती है। सही और गलत राह का अंतर स्पष्ट करती है। कथ्य और शिल्प दोनों में संदेश को जकड़कर प्रस्तुत करती है। इतना ही नहीं, कालांतर में आक्रान्ताओं की बर्बरता पर की गई वामपंथी लीपापोती के पलस्तर को भी झाड़ कर रक्तरंजित दीवार के सत्य को प्रकट करती है। अगर ‘पूस की रात’ और ‘गोदान’ किसानों के जीवन की ढेरों समस्याओं के चलचित्र है तो ‘जिहाद’ हिन्दुओ पर सदियों से किए गए अत्याचारों की पांडुलिपि।

‘कहानी सम्राट’ को इस प्रस्तुति के लिए केवल नमन ही किया जा सकता है।

Pressure politics, borders and People’s Republic Of China

0

Great historical progress always happens after a major disaster,” said Xi Jinping during a recent visit to Xi’an Jiaotong University. The question is if the “major disaster” the current pandemic or China has got more to show. Anyway, 2020 is that cursed year which doesn’t seem to get any better. We’re almost halfway through this year and these months were easy for none. Yet, it is alluring to see the nations forget the differences, unite and fight the pandemic together. With the ongoing geopolitical changes between nations, there’s an unignored entity whose growing dominance is bothering the big players like the USA, Japan, UK and Australia. China’s (mis)handling of the virus and instances of unapologetic opportunist behaviour gives rise to many questions. The recent being, why has china ratcheted the border issues with India during the global crisis? Or wait, which border? Line of Actual Control?

Line of Actual Control:

The Line of Actual Control (LAC) is a demarcation line that separates Indian-controlled territory from Chinese-controlled territory in the former princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, formed after the 1962 war. The demarcation existed as the informal cease-fire line between India and China after the 1962 war until 1993, when its existence was officially accepted as the ‘Line of Actual Control’ in a bilateral agreement. But the twist here is that the line has not been mutually demarcated yet. The mountainous terrain adds up to the confusion/deliberate intrusion on where exactly the LAC is. It has been this way since 1993, with China intruding significantly deep into Indian territory 3 times already.

Upon insisting China, to fulfill a mutual agreement with India on the demarcation of LAC, it has consistently resisted this motion. Patrolling is carried out by both the countries on the “supposed border” sometimes leading to intrusions- be it deliberate or unintended.

The skirmishes in the borders have continued due to the uncertain LAC, few of which were the 2013 Daulat Beg Oldi Sector (DBO) incident and the 2017 Doklam stand-off. The Daulat Beg Oldie standoff took place when Chinese People’s Liberation Army(PLA) established its camp 30km south off Daulat Beg Oldi near the Aksai Chin-Ladakh Line of Actual Control. This was followed by a 3-week long negotiation between the countries during which the Chinese position was reinforced and supported by trucks and helicopters.

The Doklam standoff took place when the Chinese started construction of a road in Doklam near a trijunction border area(of Bhutan, India, China). The region is claimed by both China and India’s ally Bhutan. Seeing the Chinese construction vehicles and road-building equipment extend an existing road southward in Doklam, Bhutan sought India’s help. This construction was a threat to Indian sovereignty as it was approaching the strategic Siliguri corridor that connects West Bengal to the rest of India. Hence, Indian troops armed with weapons and two bulldozers crossed the Sikkim border into Doklam to stop the Chinese troops from constructing the road. This followed by 3 months of negotiation with the respective countries withdrawing their troops from the face-off point.

2020 face-offs:

Pangong Tso is a famous lake where the climax of the film 3 idiots took place. It is also where the first Indo-China tumult of 2020 began on May 5.

Sikkim is a northeastern state that shares a boundary with China. It would be utterly hilarious if the Chinese troops enter into the Muguthang Valley (in India) and shout “This (Sikkim) is not your land, this is not Indian territory, so just go back”. Well, what were they thinking? This happened on May 10, 2020.

Chinese troops trespassing across the Indian territory into the Galwan Valley took India by surprise as that region had never seen disputes since 1962, considering it to be “settled” but now, China thinks else wise. On 21st May the PLA intruded 3 km into this Indian territory.

China for world dominance?

The point of the above intrusions by the Chinese during the global crisis does not really concern their claim over the regions but tells a different story. A story of intimidating India in the time of crisis, of asserting the power that stands threatened as QUAD countries (Japan, Australia, USA, India) grow closer, of viewing an unsettled border as leverage against India, one of the many pressure points it could use to keep India off-guard its current political crisis in Hong Kong.

Though the two countries have decided to hold bilateral talks on the recent dispute, it is unambiguous from the old habits of China to not come in final terms with the demarcation of the LAC, but to use the border dispute as a weapon in the future- which might align with “great historical progress” as Xi Jinping puts it. Exceptionally, the 2020 standoff witnessed extraordinarily heavy deployment of the Chinese army, thus, making it a planned move not by local commanders but by Beijing.

After trying to reason China’s sudden adventurism in the Indo-China border, the following developments might help us join the dots as to why China did what it did-

  • Hong Kong- “A blow to autonomy”

China’s motive to annex Hong Kong was evident from the Hong Kong Extradition Bill which led to 2019 Hong Kong riots. This move allows China to attain a more prominent hold in Hong Kong jurisdiction and pave the way to the National Security Bill.

The National Security Bill is the current hot topic as its draft is passed by the rubber-stamp Chinese parliament this week. The bill criminalizes any act that would subvert (undermine) state power, secession (breaking away from the country), organise and carry out terrorist activities and other behaviour that endangers national security, interfere with the internal affairs of Hong Kong and involve foreign or external powers.

The passing of this bill will erode the autonomy of Hong Kong and violate Article 23 of the Basic Law which upholds China as nothing more than “one nation two systems” – Mainland China and Hong Kong, thus securing Hong Kong’s Autonomy.

The purpose of this brief is to consciously remind you that this revokes free will of the people of Hong Kong and makes them liable to a shady government which is not keen on standing criticism. US, UK, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, Canada, etc condemned the bill.

What is India’s concern? India is a part of the QUAD(Japan, India, US, Australia). These countries have liberal trade relations with Hong Kong. This bill will not only hamper those relations but can also empower China’s maritime hegemony in Asia. The realization of BRI will make Chinese hegemony a reality and being a trade rival of China, India would not want that.

Hence, Trump announced he would begin taking steps to revoke Hong Kong’s favored trade status with the United States. While the UK widens visa right offers to 3 million residents in Hong Kong.

These countries have also mutually agreed upon India hoisting the Hong Kong issue with China. Right after which, China briefed key nations, including India on “upholding national security” in Hong Kong, claiming that it is “purely China’s internal affair and no foreign country may interfere in this matter”, while criminalizing the same in the infamous National Security Bill.

  • Whitewashing the mistakes

The Chinese Communist Party needs to consolidate domestic power after irresponsibly handling the outbreak of Corona virus- hiding the data from its citizens and allegedly sealing the whistle blowers of the potential pandemic. That typically looks like what the Chinese government can do. Before the faith of the Chinese slips from its acrimonious government, what would be better than inciting a feeling of patriotism in the citizens? Hence, pulling a loose string of India would not do any harm, given that its strategic political pressure has a higher stake in it.

Conclusion

As the National Security Law violates the autonomy of Hong Kong, many powerful nations condemn the smothering action taken by the Chinese government. The National People’s Congress voted 2,878 to 1 in favor of the decision to impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. Considering India can be a viable threat and along with its international allies can create political pressure on the Chinese government with regards to this bill, the Sino China border dispute is a convincing diversion of India from the current political change in China that stands denounced worldwide. Moreover, the two actions- of passing this draft in the parliament and softening its hold in the Indo China border took place simultaneously.

With the Chinese ambassador to India saying “The two countries must act in unity, pose no threats to each, adhere to a basic judgment that China and India are each other’s opportunity, and thus see each other’s developments in the correct way and enhance strategic mutual trust”, a larger picture draws our attention.

The Chinese tactics to keep India engaged in Indo China diplomacy and meanwhile force itself on Hong Kong and the South China Sea during the global pandemic (which stirred from its mishandling of the virus), leaves the world stunned on how strategically China is taking utmost advantage of the most vulnerable times in history. The future stands extremely unpredictable with China’s “great historical progress”, the USA terminating its relations with the WHO, and UK’s new proposal to form an alliance D10 (UK, US, Italy, Germany, France, Japan, Canada, India, South Korea and Australia). The world will witness critical shifts in the most dynamic geopolitical relations in the upcoming months and simultaneously fight the deadly virus

Action with speed and precision: PM Modi Part II

23rd May 2019 will always be remembered for second consecutive victory by PM Modi led NDA government with huge margin. Many opposition leaders’ aspirations to become PM done and dusted.

During election campaign, Opposition parties were thriving on certain issues trying to highlight that even PM Modi can’t do much. They mocked PM on his victory speech slogan in 2014, “Acche Din”, twisted speech on 15 lakhs to everyone, Shri Ram Mandir, “Mandir vahi banayenge par Tarikh nahi batayenge”, 370 and 35 A, UCC, his attire, personal life and foreign travel…. however, people had faith in him, and he was reelected with huge majority.

When he said “Acche Din”, my understanding is that we were been slaves of Mughals initially then Britishers and for many years dynastic politics. This slavery mindset has shattered us socially, economically and badly hurt our self-respect. So, his victory (common man, Chaiwalla) in 2014 was a sign of quitting slavery mindset and uplifting our values. In our personal life even if we achieve something, we crave for something bigger, so “Acche Din” slogan need not to be taken in another way but to see with other historical dimensions, our self-respect and values.

Many political leaders used to mock him saying that article 370 and 35 A cannot be revoked, even many supporters also mocked him on various social media platforms. Even our experiences were alerting us that it’s not that easy to revoke these articles by any political leader. It’s a big lesson for his followers and haters, whenever you plan for a bigger goal, work silently with patience, perseverance, confidence and faith. In his first term, he and his team worked on building strong foundation on legal and social aspects. PM Modi created a formidable Aura about his governance and India with world leaders. I still remember Mr. Farukh Abdullah’s statement, even if Modi is reelected several times, he can’t scrap articles. What happened on 5th Aug 2019, nobody has imagined? HM Amit Shah with his confidence and hard work, successfully passed revocation of article 370 and 35A. In addition to that, J & K has been bifurcated into two union territories, essentially to develop that region and eliminating terrorism in coming years. So, the key point is that “Comprehensive preparation is must to accomplish impossible goals”.

Shri Ram Mandir was one more long pending issue before government and judiciary. It was the strong will of the Modi government and Supreme court to resolve it amicably and speedily. Both the pillars of democracy have done excellent job with forming a team at initial phase and then day to day hearing for 40 days, judgement was given by 5 judges after through investigation of the case considering all dimensions. It shows that “If we have strong will, right intention and work in coordinated manner then solution is not far away”.

Next in line was, CAA (Citizenship Amendment Act), whatever party lines or ideology, a person, party or any organization is following, nothing is bigger than HUMANITY. We are witnessing how minorities in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan are being treated, harassed, converted or murdered. How their numbers have been decreasing every year. So, it was our duty as a human being to help them to lead a good life by giving them citizenship. It was indeed a non-justifiable act by some political leaders, organizations and celebrities to create rift in society on religious basis with fake information about CAA.

One more step which generally everyone ignores is setting up of 75 new medical colleges. Increasing medical colleges will surely help middle class, neo middle class to get admission to their ward on merit basis than paying huge donations in future. Setting up more government colleges should have been on top priority for earlier governments, but few politicians had other agenda with private colleges.

PM Modi in first term raised our economy from 2 trillion dollars to 3 trillion dollars and has vision to make it 5 trillion dollars by 2025. The steps are being taken on economic front, Aatmanirbhar Bharat will surely help to cross this target even though we are going through a tough economic phase owing to pandemic. Forex reserve is going up constantly, FDI is up, various majors are being taken to uplift MSME and banking sector. Doubling farmers income, house for everyone, improving healthcare sector and helping poor through Ayushman Bharat scheme, developing strong defense capabilities through Make in India.

We can conclude that in second term PM Modi is working speedily with precision and for the aspirations of 130 crore Indians.

Pankaj Jagannath Jayswal

Author, Writer, Educationist, Motivational speaker, AOL Teacher, Electrical Engineer

Books released in May: Youth: Reflection of Universe and in Hindi Yuva: Bramhand ka Pratibimb

www.sharencare.in