Home Blog Page 323

Democratic Party and its dangerous game of Anti India Agenda – Part 1

0

Most of Indian Americans do not know the dark side of Democratic party and its agenda towards India since the past three decades. It is rather a sad state of affairs and disappointing to note that Democratic Party is nefariously Anti India in every perspective. As we look into matters pertaining the foreign policy on India by Bill Clinton Administration in his eight year rule is an eye opener for many. Certainly, the decade 1992-2000 was one of the most strained relations for India which it dealt with President Clinton. Thanks to visionary Prime Ministers like PV Narasimha Rao and AB Vajpayee for their continuous efforts to safeguard interests of India.

Clinton Administration endorsed Secessionists in India

An Article on Associated Press about Robin Raphael.
Robin Raphel appearing Senate Committee hearing

The Clinton Administration since assuming office in 1992 has implemented various disgusting and rather separatist measures to satisfy the secessionists in India. Bill Clinton on Dec 27th 1993 wrote a letter to U.S. Rep. Gary A. Condit (D-Ceres) that, “chronic tensions between the Indian government and Sikh militants” and the need to safeguard “Sikh rights” in Punjab State, where Sikhs make up 60% of the population. This had angered Indian Government and as well the people in Punjab. Although Punjab is peaceful today, the then Clinton administration’s continuous attempts endorsing Khalistani groups and as well comments on Kashmir had drawn a huge backlash from India. (In 1971, some Punjabi separatists on the behest of Pakistan demanded for a separate Republic for Punjabi called Khalistan). Not limited to this, but Vice President Al Gore in 1997 in his letter to Khalistan National council which is an extremist group labelled by India referred Punjab state as Khalistan. This proves the fact that Democratic party has chosen every opportunity and tried to meddle in India’s internal affairs by engaging with Khalistan groups.

Not limited to this, Clinton’s close aide and Assistant Secretary of State Robin Raphael openly stated that India’s Kashmir is a disputed land. In her statement, she mentioned that the US does not recognize Kashmir to be part of India. India’s relations with Clinton’s administration ran into a doldrums. It’s not limited to Robin Raphael but Madeleine Albright who served as Secretary of State wanted a Plebiscite in Kashmir which clearly suggests how Clinton’s administration has poked against India’s affairs. Everyone knew that Kashmir had witnessed a dangerous Genocide on Hindus which resulted in killing Hundreds and thousands of Kashmir Hindus and roughly Half a million Kashmiri Hindu Pandits had to mass exodus to other parts of India. Thus, Clinton administration selectively ignored the Genocide and sided with Pakistan in all ways.

Robin Raphael, a Thorn in the Flesh for India

As part of Robin Raphael’s advocacy on Pakistan and overriding Pressler’s amendment, the Clinton Administration in an effort to strengthen ties with Pakistan allowed the sale of 38 F-16 jets and lifted sanctions on Pakistan. The irony was, she mentioned this deal while at a news conference in New Delhi. In a well calibrated move, Strobe Talbott, US Deputy Secretary of State had briefed about the sale with Prime Minister Rao and if India refuses to heed the US, then the implications would be drastic and hurt the economy mostly through cuts envisioned in loans from the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. He also threatened to invoke Super 301 trade sanctions on India. In fact, Prime Minister Rao did a fantastic job and dealt with the US with a calculated drift. As per the confirmed sources , Pakistani lobbyist and the former Asst. Secretary of State Robin Raphael after her retirement and probed in 2014 by the FBI on the suspicion that she was a Pakistani asset, quietly made a comeback after investigators closed her case without filing any charges in 2016 and President Donald Trump got elected in the US. She is back to run the business of advocacy with Pakistan.

As we look into these details, Many Indian Americans may not heard about the insidious and conniving aspects of Democratic party on India, due to lack of media communications and as well, not many digital media in India during those days. It is imperative to re-calibrate the affinity towards Democratic party and how it impacts our motherland India. 

Dhritrashtra and Gandhari Hindus: A sneak peek at UPSC-bureaucratic jihad

0

Consider a woke person sitting in UPSC Main Examination, giving a following “English” paper:

How a woke Hindu will take this paper calmly without being distracted? Now, this is a specimen, but don’t most aspirants go through UPSC website browsing through sample papers? A passage beautifully crafted to whitewash the crimes of Islamic invaders, and blame all the plunder to native rulers, even they chose none other than the GREAT Prithviraj Chauhan to paint him as a barbarian. This passage in short tells that Hindus were fools who didn’t invade any outside territory from Indian heartland, they were weak warriors who didn’t know to fight brave Arab Muslim “soldiers”, they left no piece to brand the Ghuris and Ghaznavis to mere “Dora:The explorer”.

It will be natural for any woke Hindu who knows the barbarism of Arab islamists to take atleast 10 minutes after reading this passage to calm himself or herself and to answer the related questions from jihadic point of view. Not to forget, this kind of muslim-appeasing piece is encountered even after going through 6th-12th NCERTs, where there is no place left to glorify Abrahims: whether muslims or christians, describing Islamic barbarism as “the greatest political revolution”, without even including the words “invasion/ barbarism/ exploitations/ harassment” in the chapters involving “Central Islamic Lands” of 11th or the history of islamic rules in middle classes. If we think its a way to create “neutrality”, then no! All chapters involving Hindu rulers are filled less about rulers and rule and more about women and caste suppression as if India under Hindu kings was a mere failed state.

How can we neglect the involvement of scholars of “AMU or JMI”(founders included) in the creation of separate Pakistan, didn’t these “scholars” participated in the movement of separate islamic lands? Wasn’t our first education minister part of islamic movement to destabilize India before and after partition? Isn’t this true at the time of partition, there was heavy islamic influence in bureaucracy and government! How can the certain foundation which believes in sharia and funds the most of successful UPSC aspirants, can be believed to inculcate qualities of “secularism” that includes “Hindu:religion, people and traditions”! How can the students of JMI or AMU programs be believed to not take forward their Jihadist mindset, where mess are off at time of certain holy month even for non believers, where there is some or other movement to support the likes of Yakub Memon or Afzal Guru and a poster of Jinnah after 70years of partition!

When a TV news program is stayed by high court for showing some new reality of Jihad, it is not a breach of freedom of expression? “Samvidhan Khatre Me Hai” is not spoken by saviours of journalism!

There were many Hindus expressing dissent with the Sudarshan News show for exposing the infiltration. Maybe they should learn about Jogenranath Mondal! Or maybe they should’ve woke up when the likes Hamid Ansari was harming RAW network in Iran, or when some topper Shah Faizal was on a daily rant against India, Indian government, while still on duty! They should similarly express their views without any restraints when there are absolute restrictions on religious activities of Hindus by top courts and bureaucracy without even taking them into confidence, while Abrahims are “asked” to “keep low key celebrations”. They should similarly raise their voice why non-Hindu people are in charge of temple affairs, why temples are under control of government or why any Hindu is not given the position of minority affairs minister. ( Just imagine the uproar, if some Pandit or Yogi is made education minister, in a nation where first education minister was a maulana)

If still, some Dhritrastras think that bureaucracy or UPSC jihad is a myth, they must learn out reservations of muslims and christians in government jobs from the states of WB,AP,TN, Kerala and Telangana. They must ask how without bureaucracy jihad, there is a monthly salary of moulvis and imams while no appreciation for the job of Hindu priests? They must ask why the temple golds are in possession of government but no control or monitoring of funds of mosques or churches and related organisation. These Dhritrastras must ask why even after the rule of curtailing loudspeaker volumes to below 20 decibels, and verdict of removal of loudpeakers, there are still illegal loudpeakers shrieking in some foreign invader’s language 5times a day? These Gandharis must open their eyes and see how without bureaucracy jihad, riot-affected Hindus are suppressed in various part of country, cattle smugglers are saved, or there is demolition of “illegal” Hindu temples but no demolition of similar mosques or churches or how illegal bangladeshi or rohingaya muslims get their valid documents all over country?

This list is never-ending, the case of bureaucratic or UPSC jihad is real. Its a serious case and even the BJP lead government in centre and states is funding the aspirants from muslim community in name of “minority and secularism” however there is no such schemes for Brahmins or Kshatriyas as if all aspirants from these communities are billionaires. The threat is grievous, the country is moving towards the situation of fulfilling the dream of Gazwa-e-Hind,as stated recently by Zakir Naik. Only way to solve this problem is the funding of sanatni UPSC aspirants by the likes of VHP or Bajrang Dal. However, Hindus as usual, are sleeping or have covered their eyes like Gandhari!

A detailed book can be written on the issue, giving the proofs for every facts, however it will be banned by some meLords or be disapproved or leaked by the likes of Bloomsbury.

How a Marathi folk story of a King and a mouse explains the whole charade of speaking truth to power in the context of Prashant Bhushan – contempt of court case.

0

When a court under its full wisdom and authority delivers a judgement which is unpalatable to them guardian angels of all abstract moral principals (in this case “freedom of speech”) the courts are automatically slapped with the classical, ad hominem charges of showing a lack of magnanimity, abetting the death of FOS and independent judiciary etc.    

Later, when the court adopted a rather conciliatory route by granting the convict an opportunity of introspection and reconsideration, it is seen as desperate.  

As the court, by giving due regards to the advice it received from AG, virtually grants a pardon to the convict in spite of his adamance, it is seen not as an act of magnanimity but an act committed under the mounting public pressure and is portrayed as a humiliating defeat of the court and a victory of the convict and his supporters. Ironically on odd days, the very same lot will write long pieces and deliver sermons from their pulpits on how the judiciary is increasingly falling pray to the majoritarianism.      

One can’t help but not notice how the these commentators have refrained from bringing in the caste angle, it would certainly have been a point of contention had Bhushan belonged to some other dispensation. Surely, parallels would have been drawn between the treatment of Justice Karnan vis a vis Bhushan and the case would have been used as an example to make the argument of the upper caste – majoritarian structure of our judiciary. In some other context this would have been characterised as an fixed match.  

Lastly, at least the “Modern Mahatma” knew that things should not be stretched post a certain extent. After all complying with the order is ceding away to some degree, perhaps even the person in question knew that the principle itself was not so worthy as to face the grave consequences of not paying the fine.        

The whole incident reminds me of a famous marathi folk story of that of a King and a mouse. 

The story goes like this, one fine day the mouse found a nice piece of cloth. He takes that piece of cloth to a tailor and asks him to make him a hat. Naturally, the tailor found this whole thing rather absurd and unusual and hence refused and shooed him away, the mouse in return told him that he is invited to the royal court by the king himself and for that he needed that hat, the very mention of a royal court scares the tailor and he makes him a fine hat. Flaunting his new hat the mouse goes to the royal court, uninvited and starts running around the court creating a ruckus. The king antagonised by his behaviour asks the guards to arrest the mouse. 

Here comes the relevant part, when the mouse is produced before the king he alleges that the king got him arrested because he was jealous of the fact that my hat looked better than his crown. The king, rattled by this charge commands his guard to separate the hat from the mouse. The clever mouse then starts shouting in the middle of the court filled with audiences “ THE KING IS A BEGGAR, HE TOOK MY HAT AWAY – THE KING IS A BEGGER HE TOOK MY HAT AWAY”. Every time he shouted so, the king got even more embarrassed. To save himself further embarrassment he asked the guards to return him the hat. After the return, the mouse runs away shouting “THE KING GOT SCARED, HE RETURNED MY HAT, THE KING GOT SCARED HE RETURNED MY HAT. 

Its funny how an issue that is seemingly a bit cluttered and complex is explained by a simple story told to children. It is intact a testimony to the prowess of folk wisdom. Perhaps the judges too should have drawn some lessons from this story and acted accordingly. 

EVM और चुनाव?

0

पुरे विश्व में लगभग 120 देशों ने लोकतंत्र अपना रखा है, जिनमें से सिर्फ 24 ने अब तक आंशिक या पूर्ण रूप से इवीएम का प्रयोग किया है. पर अन्य सभी देशों ने इवीएम् बैन कर रखा है ये कहना भी गलत होगा, क्योंकि तब हमें कहना होगा की भारत ने भी बैलट को बैन रखा, जो एक बार फिर गलत होगा. हाँ, बहुत सारे देशों ने इवीएम् को अब तक अपनाया नहीं है, पर क्या इससे फर्क पड़ता है ? दुसरे तरह से देखें तो ऑस्ट्रेलिया और स्विट्ज़रलैंड

ने तो आंशिक रूप से इंटरनेट वोटिंग प्रणाली को अपना रखा है, जबकी भारत समेत कई देशों ने अब तक ऐसा नहीं किया है. पर जब कुछ देश, जैसे जर्मनी, इटली, आयरलैंड आदि में एवीएम की खामियों के कारण, इसका उपयोग बंद कर दिया गया. पर उन खामियों के कारण इवीएम् का प्रयोग न हो इसका फैसला आमतौर पर उन देशों की न्यायपालिका ने किया.

आपको जान कर आश्चर्य होगा कि वर्ष 1982 में जब ईवीएम का पहली बार केरल के पेरुर नाम के विधानसभा क्षेत्र में प्रयोग हुआ था, तो वहां के विधायक प्रत्यासी सेवांत पेल्लाई ने इवीएम को असंवेधानिक बताते हुए केरल हाई कोर्ट का दरवाजा खटखटाया था. कोर्ट ने उनके आरोप को ख़ारिज किया और चुनाव इवीएम से ही हुआ, और चुनाव में जीत भी सेवांत पिल्लई की ही हुई. और फिर उनके प्रतिद्वंदी ने वापस कोर्ट जाकर दावा ठोका कि इवीएम गैर-संवेधानिक है. कहने की जरुरत नहीं कि कुछ ऐसी ही स्थिति का सामना 2014 के बाद के चुनावों में चुनाव आयोग को करना पर रहा है.

मद्रास, केरल, बोम्बे, उत्तराखंड, कर्नाटक सहित दुसरे कई उच्च न्यायलयों में इवीएम् की वैधता को लेकर अपील हुई. पर तकनिकी, प्रशासनिक और राजनीतिक पक्षों को सुनने के बाद प्रत्येक कोर्ट ने इवीएम से ही चुनाव करने का फैसला दिया. यहाँ तक कि 2017 में देश के सर्वोच्च न्यायलय ने भी ऐसी ही अर्जी को ख़ारिज किया. फिर चुनाव आयोग ने पहली बार 2009 में और फिर 2016 में सभी राजीनीतिक दलों को इवीएम को लेकर चैलेंज दिया कि मशीन को टेम्पर कर दिखाया जाये. टेम्पर करना तो दूर किसी ने चुनाव आयोग की चुनौती को स्वीकार भी नहीं किया .

हाँ कोर्ट जाने का इतना फायदा जरुर हुआ कि सुब्रमन्यम स्वामी की अर्जी पर फैसला देते हुए कोर्ट ने प्रत्येक मशीन के साथ वोटर-वेरीफाईड पेपर ऑडिट ट्रेल (VV -PAT) के उपयोग को निश्चित करने को कहा.

इन सब को नजरंदाज करें तो भी, हमें देखना होगा की हाल के दिनों में इवीएम और वॉलेट- पपेर से चुनाव से क्या फायदे और क्या नुक्सान हैं?

यहाँ हम इन दोनों पर होने वाले खर्चे की बात को नजरंदाज करते हैं क्योंकि एक मशीन और कागज के साथ इस तरह की तुलना सार्थक नहीं होगी. हाँथ से लिखा पत्र और भेजे गये ईमेल पर हुए खर्चे को जोड़ना कितना सही है. ऐसे भी मैं समझता हूँ कि लोकतंत्र को अछुन्न रखने के लिए कितनी भी बड़ी राशी कम ही होगी.

बैलट और इवीएम के बीच दूसरी तुलना इसके एक्यूरेसी को लेकर हो सकती है. जैसा कि आम तौर पर देखा जाता है कि बैलट पर गलत जगह लगा निशान उस वोट को अमान्य कर देता है. इस विषय पर हुए एक शोध की मानें तो ईवीएम् के प्रयोग से भारत में इन्वेलीड वोटों की संख्या में 90% की गिरावट हुई है. रोचेस्टर विश्वविद्यालय में हुआ यह शोध बताता है कि पहले विनिंग मार्जिन और अमान्य वोटों का अंतर कम होने की स्थिति में मामला कोर्ट में जाता था और चुनाव प्रक्रिया लम्बा खींचता जाता था. एवीएम के आने से इस तरह के मामले नगण्य हैं. यदि विनिंग मार्जिन कम होता है तो सिर्फ दोबारा काउंटिंग करने की जरुरत होती है, बस.

इस शोध में कुछ और भी निष्कर्ष निकल कर आये हैं. जैसे कि आपराधिक बैकग्राउंड के लोगों के चुने जाने की संभावना घटी है. पहले आपराधिक पृष्ठभूमि के लोग बूथ लूट कर, बैलट बाक्स में सियाही गिरा कर या फिर अपने पक्ष के अतिरिक्त बैलट पेपर गिरा कर चुनाव प्रक्रिया को बाधित तो करते ही थे, ऊपर से उनके चुने जाने की संभावना बढ़ जाती थी, भले ही जनता का वास्तविक वोट किसी अच्छे उम्मीदवार को गया हो.

इतना ही नहीं, इस शोध में यह भी देखा गया कि ईवीएम के आने से बहुजन समाज पार्टी और वाम दलों के वोटों में लगातार गिरावट आई है. मतलब पहले इन दोनों पार्टियों में बाहुबलियों की तादाद अन्य के मुकाबले अधिक होने के कारण बैलट से चुनाव कराने पर निष्पक्ष नतीजे की संभावना कम थी. हाल ही में जब पश्चिम बंगाल में बैलट से पंचायत और नगरपालिका के चुनाव हुए थे, तो बैलट बॉक्स के साथ तो सीमा से अधिक छेडछाड हुई ही, उसके अलावे गुंडागर्दी भी खूब हुई. यदि इन जगहों पर इवीएम का प्रयोग होता है तो धांधली होने के बाद दुबारा और भी कड़े सुरक्षा व्यवस्था में चुनाव कराया जाता. जबकी बैलट के साथ दुबारा ऐसा करने पर काफी तैयारी की जरुरत होती है. कहा जा सकता है कि इस तरह की तैयारी चुनाव आयोग पहले ही कर ले. पर क्या ऐसा सभी बूथों के लिए किया जायेगा, या फिर उन बूथों का पता कैसे लगाया जाय कि जो अधिक संवेदनशील है और उस पर निश्चित रूप से व्यवधान उत्पन्न होगा ही. सवेदनशील बूथ को तो फिर भी चिन्हित कर लिया जाता है चुनाव आयोग द्वारा पर क्या उन्हीं बूथों पर धांधली होगी ये कितना निश्चित है? हो सकता है कि धांधली किसी आदर्श बूथ पर भी हो जाये. कुल मिला कर, यदि धांधली हो और इवीएम का उपयोग हो तो बैलट के मुकाबले चुनाव दुबारा करने में आसानी होगी. और फिर जब बाहुबलियों को इस प्रक्रिया का पता रहेगा तो धांधली होने की संभावना कम ही रह जाती है.

कभी कभी अमेरिका का उदाहरण रख कर भी इवीएम पर सवाल उठाया जाता है. अमेरिका में भले इवीएम का प्रयोग न होता हो, पर इसी की तरह दूसरी प्रणालियों का उपयोग वहां किया जाता है. जैसे कि पंच कार्ड, ओप्टिकल रीडिंग और बैलट मार्किंग, कुल मिला कर इवीएम ही समझ लीजिये. और ऐसा भी नहीं है कि अमेरिका में इवीएम के प्रयोग का प्रयास नहीं हुआ, पर जब 50 अलग-अलग राज्यों ने अपना अलग-अलग एवीएम बनाने की बात की तो मामले को ठन्डे बसते में डाल दिया गया. अमेरिका का संघीय ठांचा भारत से कई मामलों में अलग है, इसलिए इस तरह के किसी मसलों पर सबके साथ सहमती बनाना काफी मुश्किल होता. जबकि भारत में किसी राज्य सूचि के विषयों पर, ठोस प्रयास के बाद संसद में भी कानून बनाया जा सकता है और समवर्ती सूचि में तो केंद्र का बोलबाला रहता ही है.

दुनियां जहाँ टेक्नोलॉजी के नए-नए अविष्कारों से रोज अवगत हो रहा वही हमारे राजनितिक दल अपनी हार को छुपाने के लिए इवीएम को समाप्त कर बैलेट पपेर से चुनाव कराने का राग अलापते हैं. किसी चीज में कोई दिक्कत हो तो उसकी समाप्ति उसका सामाधान कैसे हो सकता है? अभी हाल ही में इंडोनेसिया में बैलट पेपर से चुनाव हुआ और फिर लम्बे और थकाऊ मतगणना का दौर चला और इस प्रक्रिया में तीन सौ से अधिक कर्मचारियों की मौत हो गयी.

भारत में बैलट पपेर की वकालत करने से पहले राजनीतिक दल इन तथ्यों पर तो विचार नहीं करती फिर बड़े चालाकी से पश्चिम बंगाल के पंचायत चुनाव में हुयी हिंसा को भी नजरंदाज कर जाते हैं. अब जब लोकसभा चुनाव में सर्वोच्च न्यायालय के आदेशानुसार मतगणना के बाद लॉटरी से पांच वीवीपैट का चयन कर पर्चियों को गिना जाना है तो फ़िर फ़ौरी राजनीतिक बहानेबाजी के लिए चुनाव आयोग को ही कटघरे में खरे करना विपक्ष की अकर्मण्यता को ही दर्शाता है.

चुनाव आयोग लगातार मतदान को स्वच्छ एवं पारदर्शी बनाने के लिए प्रयासरत है. आयोग तो आने वाले समय में बूथों का सीसीटीवी रिकॉर्डिंग करने की योजना पर काम कर रही है, जिससे कि किसी उम्मीदवार को परेशानी होने पर उन्हें सम्बंधित बूथ की रिकार्डिंग उप्दब्द कराया जा सके . इसके अलावे दुसरे विवादों को भी सीसीटीवी रिकोर्डिंग के माध्यम से निपटा जा सकता है.

Hypocrisy of Prashant Bhushan

0

Days after Prashant Bhushan has been held guilty of contempt by the Supreme Court for his derogatory tweets against judges, liberals have already started defending him blindly. The group of 772 citizens, including retired judges, lawyers and bureaucrats, has slammed those criticizing the Supreme Court order holding senior lawyer Prashant Bhushan guilty of contempt of court. His tweet saying SC is playing an active role in the ‘destruction of democracy’ is not an opinion it’s a claim. And when such a claim comes from a Supreme Court lawyer none the less, it gives a whole other context to it. To the liberals who are supporting him, just answer this – “Did he have proof that what he said was true? Wasn’t he given a chance to argue in court?”. So called controversial lawyer Prashant Bhushan, has history of blaming and putting baseless allegations on judiciary system every time decisions doesn’t entertain his thoughts personally.

To those who say that judiciary is a joke, they need to take a look at the countries with no judiciary. Every single citizen of this country enjoys a Fundamental Right under Art.19(1)(a) which deals with freedom of speech and expression. He could have said that – ” I am unhappy with supreme court decision”, instead he claimed out of no where that judiciary is destroying democracy. There is fine line between opinion and claim and that too being a lawyer you are more than a normal senior citizen. In my opinion, Prashant Bhushan case is a case of Criminal contempt of court. Elaborating it further, he is right to criticize CJI for not wearing mask or helmet but asserting a sentence – “CJI rides a 50 lakh motorcycle belonging to a BJP leader” is blowing an agenda that supreme court judges works under influence of BJP leaders and agenda of COVID-19 lockdown is to deny justice to common people like me, you and others. And it is well known that scandalizing the top most court of this country will break the trust of the people in judiciary and ultimately the democracy will be collapsed . In my view, This is can be completely construed as contempt of court. More to it, Bhushan has history of putting allegations without proof. This is his controversial tweet given below:

Going by logic of this so called prominent lawyer cum Liberandu, judges has no right to ride a costly bike during times of pandemic, and if they choose to do so it concludes that they doesn’t bother about pending cases or by keeping SC in lockdown mode is an act where he is openly denying justice to common people. Prashant Bhushan is so much filled with hatred that he fails to see the sense before putting allegations in name of freedom of expression. I am even feeling ashamed to call him lawyer at first place. People are accountable for the their words, so why not Mr Bhushan be held guilty for defaming SC just because CJI took ride on bike, that too without providing proof. Has he personally seen CJI riding it without helmet on road? Above pic is taken with bike on stand. What else Mr Bhushan expected? He is by no mean above the law. Highlighting the fact that court didn’t gave him a jail/fine or any punishment directly. They asked him to tender apology without any condition that too after giving him two days to correct his statement.

It can be clearly seen that these liberals and urban naxals has two standards, one for themselves and second for others. Where was this Prashant Bhushan when SC in 2019 had ordered release of journalist Prashant Kanojia despite of his derogatory remarks. One of his tweet is shown below:

It said that legitimate criticism of both judgments and the functioning of the institution has always existed, but, if the judiciary is to perform its duties and functions effectively, it is also essential to protect the dignity and authority of the courts. If you put allegation on another without having adequate proof , be prepared for the consequences.

Thanks for reading:)

Colonial hangover- The mindset

In the post-independence India, I feel one major blunder we had done was giving importance to fictional history over factual history. Society has forgotten to analyze things or ask rational questions rather started to just adopt things which had been imposed on them. I won’t blame our ancestors or government for that as they are the actual victim of colonial hangover but we must not let this hangover carry-on for coming generation. Generally we ignore or fail to analyze small events in society which in turns lead to unavoidable problems. I call it “A Cancer Theory”. It’s the consumption on which the body reacts internally and when we start ignoring the syndrome the problems start. Now think our society as our own physical body whose syndrome must not be ignored and it requires constant scrutiny. I believe “Life will not give you many chances to try, we must learn from our past”.

Colonial hangover had shown the syndrome of inferiority complex and our continuous ignorance towards that may lead us to a weak society. We have till date not started to think proactively at the micro level. Few things may sound irrelevant to us today but it will not in coming future.

Almost every Indian specially the resident of West Bengal must have thought why the state is called “West Bengal” whereas it is on the eastern part of the country and I am sure many of us knows the concept of East Bengal and West Bengal separation into two states by British in the year 1905. My point is after the independence why we had not changed the name of West Bengal as after 1955 there was no East Bengal.

If we observe India’s map, Seven Sister States are actually located on the eastern part of the country but we call it northeast region. Have we wondered why? Because initially British had named the region making Bengal presidency as an epicenter and we are still continuing the same. I always get confuse why the name Uttar Pradesh as geographically it is located on northeastern part. Problem is we don’t even bother to logically or historically rename the states. This shows the ignorant attitude toward colonial hangover.

Some of our cultural acts are seen as superstition tradition by the western or to be western people and we believe them thinking whatever they say that’s the only truth. This shows our inferiority complex. I would like to put an example to make things clearer. “Upvas” is superstition but intermediate fasting is scientific or Ayurveda vs. Naturopathy & many. It is because we are imposing tradition not rationalizing it. This attitude is derived from the colonial era and I call it a colonial hangover. Our land was always a land of seekers & so curiosity should be natural to us.

Suppose there is a particular product which is present in India & some “X” country and it can be produce in any one location. Inferiority complex is so much deeply impacted us that first thought will be that product must have been imported to India and lastly or never we will think vice versa. We had been always told by our Fictional historians that we were more of insider and don’t believe in crossing the boundaries but that can be contradicted easily. Had we ever thought that rice is preferred by the gulf region and was a part of Roman cuisine, from where they had imported it? Rice can’t be grown at least in gulf region and silk route doesn’t exist before 100 BC. So if we would have exported it then we must have chosen the sea route with big ships. This proofs existence of shipping industry in ancient India.

There are many such historical facts which we must know, it will not only makes us proud & confident but also helps to overcome colonial hangover. Colonial hangovers are just a blocked mindset which results to inferiority complex and we just need to raise our conciseness.

Gujarat takes “bullet train speed” in development

0

Chief Minister Vijay Rupani has taken some Mammoth decisions within one month which has directly proven the capability of Gujarat and it’s governance. The decisions will affect directly and indirectly each and every working sector and more importantly no sector is left out in these decisions. Some Key decisions are as under.

1) New Industrial Policy 2020..
Gujarat Industrial Policy 2015 has come to an end as on 31st December 2019. It was further extended up to the date of release of new policy or 31st December 2020 whichever is earlier. The Gujarat Industrial Policy 2015 comes to an end and has supported overall industrial development across the state. The success of the policy can be evaluated by the following key points:Gujarat stands 1st in terms of nos. of IEMs (Industrial Entrepreneurship Memorandum) filed & actual investment reported for 2019 with ~51% share of IEMs filed in India in terms of value with a proposed investment of USD 49 Bn as per the data released by DPIIT, Govt of India. While India saw an increase of 48% in proposed investments (IEMs) in 2019, Gujarat recorded a growth of 333% over previous year. In FY 2019-20; Gujarat saw the highest national increment of 240% in FDI inflows from previous year as against a growth of 14% in FDI in India.

Gujarat also has the lowest unemployment rates in the entire country @3.4% as per survey report by National Statistical Office, Govt. of India. Thrust Sectors have been conceptualized with a view on global investment trends, the need for strengthening the integrated value chains, exports, policies by government of India, NITI Aayog etc. The thrust sectors have been categorized in two major groups i.e Core sectors & Sunrise Sectors. Core sectors include areas where Gujarat already has a strong manufacturing base and has potential to accelerate further on a global scale. Sunrise Sectors are sectors which have a significant potential for technological advancement and can contribute to sustainable economic development. Thrust sectors will be given incremental incentives as part of the policy.

2) 7 Town Planning schemes in a single day!!
With the commitment of integrated & planned urban development in the state, CM Vijay Rupani approves 7 more Town Planning schemes that include 2 draft TP of AUDA, 1 draft TP of Bhavnagar, 2 varied preliminary TP schemes of Ahmedabad and 2 final TP schemes of GUDA & Rajkot

3) NITI Aayog has ranked Gujarat #1 in export preparedness index.
Gujarat is flourishing in all directions and all verticals. This is one of the key performance indexes in measuring the Ease Of Doing Business.
Gujarat, that has been ranked as the top-performing state in NITI Aayog’s Export Preparedness Index 2020, is a leader in exports in the whole country with longest coastline, efficient transport system, excellent infrastructure, SEZs and export promotion policy of the Gujarat Govt

4) ‘Gujarat Land Grabbing Prohibition Act’.
CM Vijay Rupani proposes to bring a new law called ‘Gujarat Land Grabbing Prohibition Act’ with stringent provisions to curb land grabbing related crimes by mafia in the state.
??Dedicated Revenue courts to be constituted.
?? These courts will have to complete the proceedings of a case within 6 months.
?? Increased punishment
It will provide protection to land owners.

5) ‘Nal se Jal’ mission.
CM Shri Vijay Rupani decides to regularize illegal domestic water connections and to provide tap water connections to slums in urban areas of the state under PM Narendra Modi’s ambitious ‘Nal se Jal’ mission. Gujarat sets an example in drinking water supply management in the country and is all set to provide tap water connection for clean and adequate potable water supply to every household by the years 2022, instead of by 2024, as envisaged under the JAL JEEVAN mission.

6) A new era of skyscrapers construction to begin in Gujarat –
As per the new rules for construction of 70+ floor buildings in Gujarat, the plot size for construction of a building having a height between 100 to 150 metres must be minimum 2500 sqm and for the proposed height above 150 metres, the plot size has to be minimum 3500 sqm. The skyscrapers, as per the recent announcement by CM Vijay Rupani, can be constructed only on the road more than 30 meters wide and maximum 5.4 FSI will be permitted for the same. The premium FSI will be available on chargeable basis. The revolutionary decision to permit construction of skyscrapers in 5 major cities of the state will not only raise the height of buildings but the growth of urban infrastructure development in Gujarat will also skyrocket.

7) Restarting of the state’s second ship-breaking yard. CM Vijay Rupani in a visionary step approved restarting of the state’s second ship-breaking yard at Sachana in Jamnagar district, to be modelled on the lines of Alang, world’s largest ship-breaking yard, that will provide direct-indirect employment to thousands of people.

8) CM Vijay Rupani announces stamp-duty waiving on loans to support Corona affected start-ups, small industries and street-vendors and hawkers.

9) CM Vijay Rupani decides to make revolutionary revenue amendment in ‘Ganot Dhara’, according to which agriculture-animal husbandry universities, Medical-Engg colleges & others would not require a prior permission from Collector to purchase the land for educational purpose.

Gujarat has taken BULLET TRAIN speed in Development with these key decisions.

When is the independence day this year?

0

We usually bought the calendar somewhat after Diwali, around November when I was a kid. Purchase of a new calendar used to mark a small family gathering in the evening with the typical question of “When is Ganapati next year? And when is Diwali?”. My parents used to discuss the planning of leaves around the festivities considering any weekends that can be augmented. Remembering these discussions recently, suddenly struck me an oddity that I had never noticed before. You ask when is Ganapati this year, but every year it is always on the 4th of Bhadrapad; 1st fortnight. Similarly Dusshera is always on the 10th of Ashwin; 1st fortnight. It is on this very same day every year.

But then what exactly was sought with that question? Obviously what we mean with such questions is what is the date as per the Gregorian calendar these festivals are falling. Evidently this argument could be reversed to make the events that occur on fixed dates as per the Gregorian calendar appear to move erratically, such as the Independence day. For example, this year’s independence day is going to be on 11th of Shravan; 2nd fortnight. Last year it was Shravan Poornima and a year before it was on 5th of Shravan; 1st fortnight. In 1947, the year we got independence, it was 14th of Shravan (Adhik); 2nd fortnight. So someone following the traditional calendar would equivalently ask every year the title question, when is the independence day this year?

So is this just a vein discussion on different calendar systems or a meaningless revivalist argument just for the sake of revival irrelevant for the present era? Present world has accepted the western Gregorian calendar as the calendar system for the entire world and all the activities that go around the world are timed as per this calendar. In our professional life when we interact with people situated across the globe, it is beneficial to have one calendar system that is accepted and followed by everyone. Moreover, it can also be said that the present Gregorian calendar system is nearly error free and calculates the length of the year highly accurately. Should we not then just move on along with the rest of the world?

The importance of bringing this non-issue is the sentiment that I sense behind these questions. It is that of an inferiority because of the fact that we can’t even organize our festivals to occur at some definite periods of the year. Every year they occur at different dates and we need planning to accommodate. Suddenly there is an added month sometimes and all the festivals are off hugely. At the rock bottom is the feeling that we cannot even maintain a good calendar. We plainly accept it as a fact that the independence day falls on the same day every year and Dusshera keeps moving occurring anytime from late September to early November. The reality on the contrary is that they both occur on fixed days respective to their own calendar systems. The inferiority appears so deep rooted that we don’t even recognize it any more. We just have accepted the calendar alignment as an additional task that is part of the festival chores and we don’t remember how we feel about it.

The reason of this subservient acceptance is not even in the superiority of the Gregorian calendar. I accept that it is the most accurate calendar to measure a year in terms of days. But its months are divided without any logic. There is no natural cycle that is related to the months of this calendar. Natural cycles were the basis of any calendar system and the entire effort was to track and benefit from the regularity in the natural phenomena. In order to achieve this Indians invented the lunisolar calendar system, trying to give as much justice as possible to all different natural cycles. Hence the length of a year varies at times by a full month. Gregorian calendar simply overlooks the monthly variations and only attempts to make the year as close to the actual time of a year. By any means, no calendar system can claim clear technical superiority over the other. The reason could partly be in the widespread acceptance of the Gregorian calendar across the world and the need to adopt it with the increasing globalization. But that would only explain to omnipresent usage, not the acceptance as a superior calendar system.

The answer I believe is in the deep colonial mindset that we have developed. It makes us regard anything with European origin as superior to any indigenous counterpart. British rule, through the imposition of their peculiar education system that was enforced upon our society, made us believe that we were an underdeveloped brute society that had no development in the areas of science and technology. We may have had some marvelous feats achieved in the area of philosophy but in terms of scientific prowess we were no better than the cavemen. Natural conclusion was that any system of measurements that is Indian must be inferior to the corresponding western one, such as a calendar system. Militarily and politically defeated, we accepted these conclusions about our society and civilization. The impressions are so deeply engraved on our minds now that even after 75 years of independence we still are holding upon the same views.

It must be said that there is no mainstream attempt unfortunately in the independent India to correct the discourse, bringing it to more evidence based understanding. We have still been studying the same colonial syllabus of social sciences in our schools and colleges. We obtained our political independence from British in 1947 but did not become free in true sense. As Mahatma Gandhi puts in Hind Swaraj, “Those who have been affected by Western civilization have been enslaved … If we bear in mind the above fact, we can see that if we are free, India is free”. He again reminds us in the conclusion of Hind Swaraj that it would not be proper to say that we obtained home rule if we merely expel the English.

Readers may be thinking that I am fetching this too trivial point too far. Let me give you one example where this manifested bluntly. Shivajayanti, or the birth of Chhatrapati Shivaji has been traditionally celebrated in India on 3rd of Falgun; 2nd fortnight. For some reasons, may be political, that practice was changed a few years back and now it is celebrated on 19th of February. Apart from any short term gains that anyone might have had, I only see a long term loss and show of weakness here. Chhatrapati Shivaji was in fact such a visionary king that he had sensed the impacts of the colonization of mind, even though it was not institutionalized during the middle-eastern invasions. In line with the tradition of past Hindu kings he initiated a new samvat with his coronation and attempted to make Sanskrit as the official language by ordering the penning of Rajabhasha-Kosha. And we succumbed to mental pressure of colonialism and changed his birth celebration event to align with the Western calendar, without even realizing that we are victims of such a mindset.

The saddest part is this. We don’t even recognize the signs where we demonstrate a colonized behaviour, following blindly the customs picked during colonial times. This is the highest form of mind colonization. I am not suggesting here to revert to the Hindu calendar system fully for all the functioning within this country, that is not even possible. But when we adopt the western ways, we have to be cautious, not accepting anything under the premise that it is better than ours because it has come from west. We accept the knowledge of west, but on our terms and conditions. And accept only that that is well proven beyond doubt about its truth and it is well integrated with our ethos. We have to weed out very carefully the norms, customs and methods that we have simply borrowed from west, without really scrutinizing if they are fit for us, or in fact any good at all. It will require asking many such questions that are inconsequential individually. But together they will help building an Indian narrative of social outlook.

Caste on wheels

0

Caste proceeds as the base structure that cuts across practically all portions of the Indian culture. Caste as indicated by some is the most horrifying composition that figures out where people and networks should fit and likewise their occupation is fixed. Yet, for some, who fall inside the cusp of: top, center and base rungs see that caste is such a bringing together social texture, that controls the Indian culture so well and hence puts each and every individual who should what and for the individuals who are conceived in higher sections appreciates power, glory, status and authority. Caste fundamentally manages the Indian culture and many keep on buying in to their caste, since it gives them personality, pride and a mark. For quite a long time caste has been ruling over the Indian social, strict, political and social spaces and is without a doubt going more grounded and more grounded.

The individuals who appreciate being conceived as Brahmins, Kshatriyas and, Vaishyas are glad and wish that caste should keep including some from Shudras, since they likewise consume a similar social space alongside the other prevailing castes. The individuals who are brought into the world outside the arrangement of caste the purported ‘Untouchables”, the Dalits and other socialized individuals feel that caste is, for example, insidious and backward social classification and by all methods should be obliterated. Caste compartmentalized the Indians and has given every Indian a tag. Indeed, even in the second decade of the 21st Century, caste keeps on ruling the Indian mind and along these lines wins in incognito and plain manners. The individuals who thought and in their examination expressed that caste would fade as the general public creates and advances appeared to have fizzled, in light of the fact that caste is getting dug in practically all aspects of the general public and going more grounded.

We ought to clearly be glad for our nation. We commend our accomplishments in different fields and did huge advancements in science and innovation. We talk high of our way of life and civilizational values. Be that as it may, numerous individuals invest heavily in ‘strikingly’ showing their caste on wind screen or number plates of their vehicles and engine cycles. It is picking up force and developing quickly in Uttar Pradesh, the State where caste has consistently been strong to discretionary legislative issues just as others. Caste like Yadav, Jat, Gurjar, Brahmin, Pantdit, Khatriya, Lodhi, Maurya, and others show up rivaling one another and affirming their strength or family status or political status by putting their caste or sub-caste name tage on their SUVS, vehicles, engine cycles and different vehicles. Indeed, even in the Southern expresses some put their caste labels on their vehicles. As of late, such an affirmation is making strides.

Recognizing the developing caste devotion, V K Singh, the extra vehicle magistrate, authorization stated, “This is genuine that numerous individuals these days drive vehicles with their caste names composed on the body, window screen or enlistment number spots.” However, he included that “Doing this isn’t allowable under the Motor Vehicles Act and activity against such vehicles is set aside from effort to time.” Similarly those castes that line up with the ideological groups when they structure the administration invest heavily of composing their caste names intensely. These days in Uttar Pradesh, castes, for example, Kshatriya, Thakur or Rajput and different variations are the new contestants in Uttar Pradesh. By strongly showing their caste labels they send a reasonable message that ‘Don’t set out to contact us or meddle with us”. These things send clear message that our administration is administering and we are in dominant part—obviously inferring ‘keep an eye out’.

Showing the caste names opening on the wheels and investing wholeheartedly of to which caste one is brought into the world is such backward and in reverse and absolutely not dynamic or forward looking. Caste is such an appalling social framework which should be destroyed and tested.

Lion’s share may invest heavily of it, however this social detestable tricks the advancement and respectfulness of the country. We, as Indians can’t state that we are advancing or creating keeping the arrangement of caste unblemished.

The rise of nationalism

0

A feeling of love or pride for your own country,a felling that your country is better than any other”

this definition appears when you google “nationalism”. Love and pride for India was always there, but the extreme feeling for nations betterment was missing. Back to when RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) was found in 27 september 1925 their aim was to protect and propagate Indian tradition,civilization with Hindu nationalism.

This was first when “nationalism” comes to play, but unfortunately the different ideology of INC leads to suppressed it. INC ban RSS several times that shows that they always stood against RSS ideology of Hindu nationalism. INC always have soft corner for Muslim extremism. and also INC was doing minority politics that leads to foundation of BJP (Bhartiya Janta Party) in 6 April 1980. This was the first time in Indian politics a party was found for hindu nationalism and it come well. Ram Janmabhoomi Andolan was a major event for rise of nationalism and it also benefits BJP. somewhere it leads in elections and first time BJP comes in power Atal Bihari Vajpayee become the prime minister of India. Increase in nationalism was started, this was first time when it seems Hindu majority can impact in nations politics.

Wave of Nationalism (2014)

You can call it wave but it was tsunami. Hindu nationalism was floating like a river in every Hindus hearts. Because it seems that after 800 years a Hindu was getting power in Delhi. Narendra Modi was next Prithvi Raj Chouhan. BJP wins 282 seats and got absolute majority and the journey begins. Step by step Modi’s government decision was clear towards nationalism aggression.

Hindu Nationalism (2019)

BJP wins with landslide victory. 303 seats and this term will be focus as Hindu nationalism peoples sentiment are with Modi which where suppressed by INC from 60 years.