Home Blog Page 320

Independence: What do you think?

0

When did we got our Independence? when did we become a free country? 15 August 1947. Is that your answer?

I take it with a pinch of salt. If we say that India became free on 15 Aug 1947 and before that we were under the occupation of Britishers; I really feel that we need to visit the entire scenes once again and reassess our thoughts. We proclaim that on 15 Aug 1947, British freed us from the years of tyrannical rule. Agreed, Britishers were imperialist powers. We were being ruled by foreigners; Britishers were occupiers. So, getting free from the clutches of a foreign force who was occupying your country and ruling over your country is the freedom.

Agreed; but when did we become occupied and started getting ruled by foreigners? Did it start with the arrival of Britishers only? Were Britishers the first foreigners who attacked our country and ruled over us?

If Britishers were foreigners; then why were those Turks or Persians or Uzbeks or Mongols not foreigners? Why were those monstrous invaders who attacked our country, massacred millions of Indians, broke our holy temples, raped and enslaved our women and ruled over us not foreigners? How conveniently these fanatic Jihadists have been transformed to be our own? Who condoned them from being foreigners? Who whitewashed the entire history of our oppression and cries under their rule in an era of glory?

Let’s take the example of Mughal dynasty for instance. Mughal dynasty started with Babur. Babur was from present day Uzbekistan, in no way connected to India even during that period. But Babur and his progenies who wreaked havoc on our country and butchered millions of our country men are not foreigners? Why?

Who whitewashed their inhumane cruelties; worse than Hitler Nazis as being acceptable? Who promoted and glorified the falsified history that Mughals belonged to us and that entire Mughal clans who kept ruling over us; killing our people, breaking our temples, looting our resources, imposing zaziya on us to follow our religions were not foreigners but our own? You know well and now it’s time to speak up.

1857 is always being hailed as the first struggle for independence. Mangal pandey lit the fire which engulfed the British forces. Everyone fought against British and it was called as the first battle for independence. Really! was this the first battle for independence? We have been fed this history time and again that this was the first battle for independence. And against whom were we fighting; foreign invaders, the Britishers.

If fighting against foreign forces is the battle for independence, then these battles of independence started hundred of years before 1857.

So, let’s see when these foreign invasions started. If we see what we consider as today’s India, probably the first invader who attacked India was Alexander. Brave king Porus fought against Alexander and the juggernaut of Alexander stopped. This was the first battle to keep us independent.

Now my next question; when did we get started to be ruled by the foreigners, not just invasion? Have you heard of Raja Dahir, the King of Sindh? Mohammad Bin Qassim attacked Sindh; Raja Dahir fought against him but finally lost the battle. Muhammad bin Qassim established the rule over that area and killed millions of Hindus to establish the supremacy of newly founded Islam. That was the first foreign rule imposed over us. Mohammad bin Qassim was the first foreigner who started to rule over us and anyone who fought against him, were our freedom fighters.

Then came so many other barbaric, blood thirsty invaders; Taimur, Ghori, Ghaznavi, Chengiz, Lodhi, Tughlaq, Abdali, Hussain and Mughals. All of them were foreigners who occupied our land and started to rule over us. And all those who fought against these foreigners were freedom fighters, who fought to keep our civilization alive; Prithviraj Chauhan, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Guru Gobind Singh, Maharana Pratap and many more. All of them were warriors who fought against these foreign invaders. These warriors gave us independence, though in bits and pieces, over time.

But we were tutored and brainwashed to believe that only Britishers were foreigners, who ruled over us, looted us; and anyone who fought against Britishers were freedom fighters.

Really? Being ruled by Britishers is occupation but being ruled by Uzbeks, Persians, Turks and Mongols is not occupation. Fighting against the Britishers is freedom struggle but fighting against Mughals to be not counted as freedom struggles. That Lord Macaulay was a foreigner but Babur and Ibrahim Lodhi were our own. That general Dyer was a cruel foreign British Officer who killed hundreds during Jallainwala Bagh; but Aurangzeb who killed millions of our countrymen and murdered our Gurus, bricked alive their young sons was not a foreign monster but our own.

Such blatant lies have been fed to us as history for generations that we actually started to believe in.

Now move on to the next step. Britishers were those foreign invaders who invaded us, ruled us and when it became difficult for them, left our country. But these Mughal loonies who invaded us, destroyed us, massacred us, looted us are still present here and arrogantly lay claim to this country. Still their minions sing paeans and proclaim openly from the pulpits that their forefathers ruled India for 800 years; without an iota of shame or remorse.

You might have also heard this lunatic rant:

Sabhi ka khoon shamil hai yahan ki mitti me,

kisi ke baap ka Hindustan thori hai.

These unapologetic descendants of Mughals claim their rights on this country because their forefathers fought against Britishers; foreigners who invaded India. One foreigner who was ruling earlier fighting another foreigner who threatened their foreign rule. What an irony!

Just imagine a situation. It may sound funny but just think of it. British got defeated and vast majority of them instead of leaving India, settled in India. And then Britishers would say;

Mere Angrej baap ka bhi khoon shaamil hai yahn ki mitti me,

Sirf Mughalo ki auladon ka Hindustan thore hai.

But Britishers are foreigners nooooooo……

Going by that logic, Britshers have also shed blood defending this country. Remember Japanese invasion in second world war, they also fought against Japanese invasion who attacked India. Battle of Kohima is one such heroic tale of military valour whose remnants are still existing in the Kohima cemetery even now. If that is the logic, how can some say that Britishers have not shed their blood for this country. To counter it, liberals may say that Britishers were fighting to save their rule in india. If Britishers were fighting to save their rule, then for what were Mughals fighting; Mughals were also fighting to save their monstrous, blood thirsty regime in India. But Mughals fight was our own fight while Britishers fight was a foreign fight.

Britishers might have left, but Mughals never went back. And very often, you would find these arrogant descendants of Mughals venting their suppressed angers of no more ruling over this Kaafir land. So when some Owaisis of Hyderabad say; “ Our ancestors ruled this country for 800 years”, you could easily find the hidden Mughals still sitting there. Some Mughals parted ways permanently and made Pakistan. But many are still left and that venomous, monstrous Mughal identity is not dead, it is just subdued for a moment. And those who don’t want to shun their invaders ancestry and keep glorifying invaders; what do you think of them, that they have changed. No, they have not.

From Raja Dahir to Prithviraj Chauhan to Maharana Pratap to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and many more; there has been a continuous struggle for Independence, and you know from whom. So, wake up and face the reality. Our independence is about protecting our civilization; from whomsoever it may be.

The atrocious portrayal of Indian Air Force in movie Gunjan Saxena points to a larger social malaise in Indian media

There is justified uproar and anger over the way Indian Air Force and its culture is depicted in Karan Johar-produced movie Gunjan Saxena. The film presents male officers of IAF as hardcore misogynists who not only dislikes a woman being inducted into the force but also treats her badly to the point of physical abuse.

Not surprisingly, nationalist sections of Indian media and ordinary people have let their disgust with the movie be well-known. However, blaming just Karan Johar or even Bollywood for the pathetic depiction of IAF would be ignoring the much larger malaise that is afflicting the Indian intelligentsia and even the ordinary public.

The real problem is an obsession that Indian journalists and other wannabe intellectuals of this country have developed with running down their own nation for the sake of looking enlightened. This requires a detailed explanation.

Dissing your own country

As per the existent culture in our country, the shortest route to becoming an intellectual is describing Indians and their culture as regressive. Especially when it comes to issues of gender justice and women empowerment, all you need to do in order to be considered enlightened and modern is to run down your own society and people as misogynist, sexist, and every other term describing male chauvinism.

In Indian media, this phenomenon has translated into an obsession to depict the story of every successful women as one of her facing unrelenting opposition and discrimination in the pursuance of her goals. This is something the author of this article has witnessed first-hand during his time as a journalist covering sports.

Personal experience

Back in 2016, three Indian women made the nation proud with their performances in Rio Olympics. PV Sindhu and Sakshi Malik won medals at the games while Deepa Karmakar created history by becoming the first Indian to reach finals of a gymnastic competition.

As expected, they were widely interviewed. Karmakar revealed that it was her father, a weightlifter himself, who got her into gymnastics. Sindhu’s tilt towards sports was even more natural as both her parents were volleyball players at national level. Sakshi too benefitted due to her being from Haryana – the cradle of sports culture in India and being granddaughter of a wrestler.

It was clear that all three had been pushed into the field of sports by their families and had received full support from them. But that is not what journalists in India find sexy. For them, Indian men can never be anything but unimaginably repressive towards women. And when Indian media doesn’t find the story it likes, it creates it.

Creating sob stories

Just after the Olympics of 2016, I was working as an intern for a newspaper. As it happened, one of my senior colleagues was going to interview Sakshi Malik. The editor told the interviewer that she should try and find out about the opposition she faced from family and other. This was the theme he wanted for that interview.

Not surprisingly, the interview was published with the headline ‘Against All Odds,’ and one of the blurbs had her talking about how people didn’t think it appropriate for her to participate in men’s sports.

Now, it is nobody’s case that sexism does not exist in India. However, as it has been observed, what is true of this country, the opposite is also true. Yes, Haryana has had an atrocious record on social indicators related to women. But there is a parallel story also about how, the same people are also very keen to see their daughters excelling in sports.

Media coverage in the aftermath of Rio Olympics would have you believe that success of Indian women in sports is a recent phenomenon. Those writing such nonsense should remember that India has been producing great female sportspersons for a long time.

In 2002, Indian contingents performed brilliantly at the Manchester Commonwealth Games and Busan Asian Games. Many of the top performers were women and, many of those were from the much-maligned ‘sexist’ den of Haryana.

Interacting with sports stars

Coming back to the way media works, in the last year, I had the privilege to interview several members of the Indian women’s hockey team, in my capacity as sports reporter for International Business Times, India. There was something very interesting about my interactions with them.

When I talked to the players, I asked about what led them to take up hockey and the difficulties they faced. Interestingly, many of them praised their families for extending full support. In fact, not one of the ladies complained about their family telling them that the game as ‘improper’ for girls.

Yes, they did face problems. But those didn’t have to do with gender. The issues they battled were poverty, lack of adequate facilities, lack of financial support, and, in rare cases, the worry of their parents that sports are not a dependable source of livelihood. As a matter of fact, Savita, the goalkeeper of women’s team, said to me that girls are highly respected in her family.

Now, perhaps some of these ladies did face some opposition from their families. If I probed for it, maybe, I would have discovered some discouragement at some stage from someone.

But that’s precisely the point. I didn’t go there with a pre-determined mindset to look for stories of persecution and discrimination. I just asked them simple questions and let them speak, rather than encouraging them to say what I wanted to hear. I was looking for their story, whatever it is, not their story as I want it.

But that’s not what journalists want. They want to sing along in the chorus of ‘Oh how terrible our country is.’ After all, it’s only India where women face discrimination and only India where crimes are committed against them!

There is also a problem with the tendency of Indians to feel sorry for themselves. If you tell someone that they have faced discrimination, regardless of whether they have or not, 99 out of 100 would agree. It’s what in Hindi is called ‘ungli kata ke shaheed banana’ (becoming a martyr just by pricking your finger).

This is why Karan Johar and his fellow filmmakers chose to depict IAF as a bastion of severely misogynist men who continuously torment a young lady just because of her gender. For the journalists and Bollywood, Indian men and Indian society are irredeemably sexist. Any women who has succeeded in her life could have no support from her family. That’s why the story of Gunjan Saxena has been presented in this form.

India-Japan bilateral relations during the Shinzo Abe era

0

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo PM Abe announced his resignation from office last Friday due to severe underlying health conditions. But he says he’ll stay on until a successor is named.

Shinzo PM Abe belongs to a powerful political dynasty that already produced two powerful PM before him. He became the longest-serving PM in Japan after breaking the record of his uncle and Japan’s former PM, Eisaku Sato. He became the youngest PM in Japan after WW2. He has earned himself a reputation of a strong leader who was ready to bulldoze through controversial policies.

PM Abe has been a firm conservative politician and known for his nationalistic policies. These policies tried to bend toward Japan’s revisionist history. He never failed to publicly contend Japan’s colonial history and particularly its role of wartime sexual exploiter, violence, and slavery of comfort women in Korea and elsewhere in the east and southeast Asia. Japan under PM Abe never failed to apologize for the cruelty committed by colonial Japan and the entire world patted on his back for his modesty. These views have been visible in PM Abe ’s domestic and foreign policy decisions during much of his tenure since he became PM in 2012.  Abe is the epitome of the generation of leadership. 

PM Abe’s first term as PM ended quite abruptly. He resigned within a year due to severe health issues. After this resignation in 2007, he was re-elected in 2012. Since then, he has been a dominant face in Japanese politics, winning a landslide third term in 2017 and fourth in 2019. His present term was set to end in September 2021. But unfortunately, his ailments didn’t let him complete his tenure.

Shinzo PM Abe has been India’s close friend. He joined hands with India on global platforms. During the Doklam crisis and the recent standoff at LAC, Japan has criticised China for changing the status quo. It all started back in 1957 when Japan’s then Prime Minister and Shinzo PM Abe’s grandfather, Nobosuke Kishi visited India. He was enamoured by the humility of PM Jawaharlal Nehru. Nobusuke was a leader of a defeated nation of World War 2. He narrated this episode to his young grandson, Shinzo PM Abe. Years after, PM Abe cherished and recalled this episode before Indian parliaments in new Delhi in 2007 where he quoted “Prime Minister Nehru brought my grandfather to an outdoor civic reception at which tens of thousands of people have gathered, introducing him to the crowd energetically saying, ‘This is the PM of Japan, a country I hold in the greatest esteem’. This is the story I heard as a young boy from my grandfather. As a leader of a defeated nation, he must have felt much delighted.” This is where PM Abe established an initial connection and fostered deeper ties with India.

He placed Indo Japan relations on a strong and stable footings. His leadership not just built strong strategic ties with India but also enabled India to join the club of major democratic powers in Indo pacific. Japan initiated the Quadrilateral dialogue between USA Australia and India in 2007. PM Abe pitched QAUD as an effective alliance to counter China’s aggression in the region. He laid the foundation of the concept of Indo Pacific as the ‘dynamic coupling as seas of freedom and prosperity’ in broader Asia. He articulated the need to look at India and the Pacific Ocean as one entity, ‘confluence of the two seas’ as he nicknamed it.  He articulated a larger regional response to evolving realities of the time, China’s expansion, and ever-mounting pressure from North Korea under Kim Jon Un. His vision around the region shaped not only Japan’s but India’s foreign policy. His contribution to the strategic posture in the region cannot be underestimated. In 2014, PM Abe began focusing on building relations, between Japan and ASEAN India, and Australia. The Indo Pacific region used to be an extremely sensitive zone, where Shinzo PM Abe has managed to emerge as a prominent player over the years. He wanted to have a more relaxed military posture and robust security reform amidst the fumbling security landscape of East Asia. Japan’s ties have matured, expanded, strengthened, and diversified significantly in past decades.

After PM Modi’s pompous victory in 2014, the Indo- Japan relations have flourished than ever before. He found an ally in PM Modi.  During his second tenure, he visited India thrice in 2014, 2015, and 2017. In 2014, PM Abe was the first Japanese PM to attend the republic day parade in India as the chief guest. His visit to PM Modi’s constituency Varanasi to witness Ganga Aarti stole the show. PM Shinzo called India, ‘its most dependable friend’ and Modi called him the cornerstone stone of India’s ACT EAST Policy. Two leaders have worked extensively on 6 factors; economic relations, nuclear energy, connectivity, maritime security regional issues, and defence and security. Japan has provided aid to India in building Digital Infrastructure to cyberspace. It is the third-largest source of FDI to India after Mauritius and Singapore.

Both sides signed several MOUs and bilateral agreements in the following years. India signed an agreement with Japan to build its first bullet train under Mumbai- Ahmedabad high-speed rail corridor. We chose only japan because its Shinkansen system has a glorious safety record. Not a single accident has taken place in the last 53 years since it came into operation. During PM modii’s visit to Japan, 10 MOUs were signed and in 2018, 32 were signed during Japan Indo annual summit. Direct investment from Japan to India has gone up from 2 billion dollars in 2014 to well more than 3.5 billion dollars in 2018. The two countries have expanded military cooperation. The two countries are supposed to hold a virtual summit next month where to sign a key military logistics pact. This was delayed after India cancelled a summit in Guwahati during the anti CAA riots. 

PM Abe oversaw Japan’s recovery from the earthquake, Tsunami, and a nuclear disaster. He is a very practical and pragmatic leader. Under him, Japan made defence expenditure a priority, taking it up from as low as 1% to 13% of its overall GDP. Shinzo Abe steered Japan’s defence strategy in a radical new direction, he pledged to revise Japan’s pacifist post-WW2 constitution to counter changing security threats to the nation as he is sought to wipe out newly assertive china making incursions into Japanese waters and expanding its territories in South China sea. Abe’s military reforms and containment diplomacy has upset China, its largest trading partner. He sought to find a balance between combating and cooperating with china despite his radical security ambitions. Abe tried hard to improve the deteriorating relations with China. Another major accomplishment to be noted is working with Donald Trump. Leaders across the world struggle to understand President Trump. Abe was also struggling to write the charter imposed by the victorious American occupiers after the Second world war.  Abe’s tenure was much cheered for his celebrated “Abenomics’ that focussed on Japan’s economic revival. However, Abenomics has lots of issues to be catered to. Abe was successful in monetary policy and monetarism; however fiscal consolidation and structural reforms are yet to be worked upon. Experts believe that there won’t be any major change in Abenomics but whether Abenomics will continue without Abe, still resides in the lapse of the future.

Abe resignation came at a time when Japan faces many challenges as of coronavirus pandemic, a stagnant economy, and the postponed 2020 Tokyo Olympics which they are hoping could go ahead in next summer. With Abe set to resign, the future of Japan’s relations with the countries in the region also becomes an open question. His retirement is set to create a gap on the international stage where he has been applauded for so long. His successors would have to take cognizance of these multiple factors. There are lots of ‘ifs’ and ‘buts’. But now the momentum is set for Indo Japan relations. Whosoever will be his successor, would take this legacy forward. Whosoever be the next to take hold, both the parties would have to strive to take PM Abe’s legacy forward.  New Delhi has cherished Abe’s courtesy and will dearly miss him forever. New Delhi now waits for his successor-who, as a south block official said, ‘will have big shoes to fill’.

प्रवेश-परीक्षाएं और कोविड-19: शिक्षा बनाम स्वास्थ्य

0

चीन जनित महामारी के इस दौर में भारत सरकार ने प्रवेश परीक्षाएँ और विश्वविद्यालयों के अन्तिम वर्ष की परीक्षा विविध रूपों में कराने का निर्णय लिया है। जब चीनी वायरस के हजार से कम मामले थे, तब पूरा भारत बन्द हुआ। आज जब 65 हजार लोग इस वायरस से असमय काल-कवलित हो चुके हैं, तब भारत में सब कुछ खुल रहा है। विशेषतः JEE/NEET और अन्य विश्वविद्यालयों की प्रवेश परीक्षाओं को लेकर चिन्ता व्यक्त की जा रही है। जाहिर है इन परीक्षाओं के आयोजन में यातायात और परीक्षा केन्द्रों के बाहर सोशल डिस्टेंसिंग का पालन हो पाना असम्भव है।

कुल मिलाकर एक ऐसी परिस्थिति है जिसमें ‘शिक्षा और स्वास्थ्य’ में से एक को चुनने जैसी दुविधा है। हालांकि स्वास्थ्य को सबसे महत्त्वपूर्ण मानकर प्रथम वरीयता देने में किसी को कोई हिचिकिचाहट नहीं है। लेकिन इस माहौल में शिक्षा व्यवस्था का भविष्य क्या होगा, यह भी चिन्तनीय है। विगत कई महीनों से हर तरह की परीक्षाओं का विरोध होता रहा है, जिसमें हमने भी कई बार इस विरोध का समर्थन किया है।

प्रवेश-परीक्षाओं का विरोध (टालने/ न आयोजित) करने वाले लोगों का मत है कि कम से कम वैक्सीन आने तक, स्थिति सामान्य होने तक, लोगों का भय खत्म होने तक परीक्षाएं टाल दी जाएं। इन परीक्षाओं में कोरोना संक्रमण का खतरा अपने चरम पर होगा और घर-घर में कोरोना के मरीजों के बढ़ने की संभावना है। अगर हम मान लें कि युवाओं की ‘इम्युनिटी’ अच्छी है तो उनके घरों में रहने वाले वृद्ध एवं मधुमेह, हृदय-रोग आदि विभिन्न स्वास्थ्य-समस्याओं से पीड़ित कम इम्युनिटी वाले सदस्यों की जान को खतरा है। अपने देश की निम्न-स्तरीय, अपर्याप्त और लुटेरी स्वास्थ्य-व्यवस्था का हकीकत भी हम जानते ही हैं। और इस समस्या का समाधान आगामी महीनों में असम्भव ही है।

अब महत्त्वपूर्ण समस्या यह है कि हम इन परीक्षाओं को कब तक टाल सकते हैं.? टालने की परिस्थिति में हमारे पास विकल्प क्या हैं.? दो विकल्प बचते हैं- 1) मेरिट के आधार पर नामांकन हो। 2) कुछ और महीने बाद परीक्षाएं हों, अधिकतम एक सत्र को शून्य किया जा सकता है। (अन्य विकल्प आप सुझा सकते हैं।)

पहले विकल्प पर चर्चा करें तो मेरिट के आधार पर (कम से कम अच्छे रैंकिंग वाले संस्थानों में) प्रवेश-प्रक्रिया का ‘एक सामान्य निर्धन परिवार से आने/पढ़ा-लिखा होने के नाते’ मैं सख्त विरोधी हूँ। अकैडमिक-मेरिट के आधार पर प्रवेश होने पर सभी 98% से ऊपर अंक प्रतिशत पाने वाले कुछ ‘बड़े विद्यालयों’ के छात्र ही अच्छे संस्थानों का हिस्सा बन पायेंगे। और सभी गुणवत्तापूर्ण उच्च शिक्षण संस्थानों से भारत का 95% छात्र समुदाय पूरी प्रवेश-प्रक्रिया से पूर्ण रूप से बाहर हो जायेगा, वंचित रह जायेगा।

प्रवेश-परीक्षाएं वह माध्यम हैं जब एक गांव, एक कस्बे के छोटे सेइंटर-कॉलेज का पढा लिखा 50-60% अंक पाने वाला छात्र भी CBSE बोर्ड और अन्य प्राइवेट संस्थानों के 99.99% पाने वाले छात्रों को धोबी-पछाड़ देता है। हर क्षेत्रीय/आर्थिक/सामाजिक पिछड़े तबके के पास प्रवेश-परीक्षाएं वह एक आखिरी मौका होती हैं जब वह गुणवत्तापूर्ण उच्च शिक्षण संस्थानों में अपनी भागीदारी सुनिश्चित करता है। हम को अखबारों में कम से कम।पढ़ने को मिलता है कि फलाँ किसान/मजदूर के बेटे ने फलाँ परीक्षा में सफलता प्राप्त की। प्रवेश परीक्षाओं को रोककर मेरिट के आधार पर प्रवेश देना इस अवसर को छीनने जैसा है। ऐसा होने पर मैं स्वयं अशिक्षित रह जाता, यह मैं भली-भाँति जानता हूँ। इसलिये मैं प्रवेश-परीक्षाओं के ऐसे किसी भी विकल्प का अन्तरात्मा से समर्थन नहीं कर सकता। 

दूसरे विकल्प में समस्या है कि इन परीक्षाओं को कब तक टाला जा सकता है.? वैक्सीन आने की कोई संभावना नहीं दिख रही है। 2 महीने और टालने पर पूरे वर्ष का पाठ्यक्रम पढ़ाने के लिये 6 महीने का ही समय बच पायेगा जो अपर्याप्त होगा। प्रवेश होने के बाद कम से कम ऑनलाइन पठन-पाठन शुरू किया जा सकता है। कुछ और महीने टालने/सत्र शून्य करने में दूसरी समस्या यह है कि प्रतिवर्ष अकेले 12वीं कक्षा में 1 करोड़ छात्र परीक्षाएं देते हैं। इस वर्ष, 2020 में केवल CBSE बोर्ड से 12 लाख छात्र 12वीं की परीक्षा में भाग लिये हैं। अब इन छात्रों को अपने अग्रिम भविष्य का निर्धारण भी करना है। अपने जीवन के सबसे महत्त्वपूर्ण कालखण्ड में उनका प्रवेश सुनिश्चित होना है।

अगर हम परीक्षाएं टालते गये तो 2021 में सभी शैक्षणिक संस्थानों में सीटें उतनी ही रहेंगी और अभ्यर्थी दुगने (लगभग 2 करोड़) हो जायेंगे। अर्थात् पूरे एक वर्ष के छात्र किसी भी संस्थान में प्रवेश लेने से वर्जित रह जायेंगे, उनका भविष्य अंधकारमय होगा। और तो और इस वर्ष के छात्रों के ऊपर पूरे एक वर्ष का अतिरिक्त शैक्षणिक व्यय आयेगा जो सभी परिवारों के लिये एक अतिरिक्त आर्थिक बोझ होगा। सरकार का शिक्षा पर व्यय उतना ही रहेगा क्योंकि कर्मचारियों को वेतन आदि सुविधाएं उसे हर हाल में देनी ही हैं। छात्र शिक्षा से वंचित भी रहें और सरकार का व्यय कम भी न हो, ऐसे में सरकार का निर्णय कुछ हद तक अपने हित में है, तार्किक है, छात्रों के हित में है।

हाँ, विभिन्न राज्य विश्वविद्यालयों द्वारा अन्तिम वर्ष के छात्रों की ‘ऑफलाइन परीक्षा’ कराने का निर्णय संतोषजनक नहीं है। इसके कई बेहतर विकल्प हो सकते थे। प्रथम/द्वितीय वर्ष की भाँति अन्तिम वर्ष/सेमेस्टर को प्रोमोट करने में कोई बाधा नहीं होनी चाहिये। अन्तिम सत्र की परीक्षा के पक्ष में दिये जाने वाले तर्क, कम से कम सेमेस्टर प्रणाली में तो अनुपयोगी ही हैं। विकल्प भी हैं – ऑनलाइन परीक्षाएं करा सकते हैं। ऑफलाइन कराना ही है तो अभी कुछ महीने टाल कर ‘अपीयरिंग’ आधार पर अन्य संस्थानों में प्रवेश/ नौकरियों में आवेदन का अवसर आदि दे सकते हैं। अगले वर्ष तक कभी भी एक महीने का समय निर्धारित करके परीक्षाएं करा सकते हैं। प्रवेश-परीक्षाएं एक छात्र के लिये 2-3 हैं, वार्षिक परीक्षाएं 10 या उससे अधिक हैं। छात्रों को कैंपस जाना है, अलग अलग जगहों से जाकर साथ में रहना है, खाने पीने की व्यवस्था करनी है, पढाई कर के परीक्षा देनी है। यह सब चुनौतीपूर्ण है।

अन्य महत्त्वपूर्ण पक्ष यह भी है कि हम कब तक घरों में बैठे रह सकते हैं.? साधन-सम्पन्न लोग घरों में बैठकर सामाजिक गतिविधियों की निन्दा कर सकते हैं, लेकिन अगर साधन-विहीन समुदाय घर में बैठा रहे तो वह बीमारी के बिना ही मरने पर मजबूर होगा। अब लॉकडाउन बढ़ा पाना सरकार के हाथ से बाहर है। पूर्ण लॉकडाउन का पालन भी तब तक नहीं हो सकता जब तक सरकार अत्यधिक सख्ती से पेश न आये। कोरोना अभी हर कस्बे, हर गाँव तक पहुँच बना चुका है। जिनको होना है, घर बैठे बैठे पॉजिटिव हो जा रहे हैं। कभी न कभी हमें इसके सामने आना ही है, सामना करना ही है। यद्यपि कुछ दिन टला रहे तो बहुत बड़ी बात होगी।

लोकतांत्रिक देश में हर छोटी बड़ी समस्या के लिये समाज की अन्तिम इकाई भी सरकार को ही दोषी ठहराती है। सरकार को यह बात कम से कम पता तो होनी ही चाहिये। अगर ऐसे में सरकार लाखों छात्रों को जुटाकर परीक्षा कराने जैसा बड़ा निर्णय लेने की इच्छाशक्ति दिखा रही है, तो हमें उसका सहयोग करना चाहिये, ऐसा मेरा मानना है। सरकार को एक कदम औरआगे बढ़कर प्रतियोगी परीक्षाओं को भी समय से कराना चाहिये और प्रतीक्षारत योग्य युवाओं को रोजगार के अवसर उपलब्ध कराने चाहिये। एक पक्ष स्वास्थ्य सम्बन्धी अपने तर्कों और बिन्दुओं के आधार पर असहमत हो सकता है। और वस्तुतः उस पक्ष की चिन्ताओं का सरकार के पास कोई ठोस समाधान नहीं है, यह शत-प्रतिशत सत्य है। अतः वह पक्ष भी गलत नहीं है। किन्तु दो महत्त्वपूर्ण पक्षों में मेरी दृष्टि में प्रवेश-परीक्षाएं कराना सरकार का सही, तार्किक और साहसपूर्ण निर्णय है। प्रत्येक सामान्य नागरिक/विद्यार्थी को इस निर्णय के पक्ष में हिम्मत के साथ सरकार का सहयोग करना चाहिये।

पितृ पक्ष और पिता की अंतिम स्मृति

0

आप संज्ञा शून्य से हो जाते हैं, जब कोई अपना बहुत दूर चला जाता है, अनंत की यात्रा पर,जहाँ से वो इस रूप में कभी वापस नहीं आएगा.

आप उससे कभी मिल नहीं पायेंगे, उसे देख नहीं पायेंगे, उसे छू नहीं पाएंगे, उसे सुन नहीं पाएंगे…..सब कुछ होगा बस वो नहीं होगा….. एक ऐसी बेचैनी…..जो आप की जान ले रही होती है और आप ज़िन्दा होने का अभिनय कर रहे होते हैं …… जब किसी निकटस्थ का ये अंतिम प्रयाण चल रहा होता है तब अनेक विधियाँ संपन्न होती हैं. आप यांत्रिक भाव से उन्हें करते जाते हैं. कब, क्यों, कैसे, कितना, वैज्ञानिक, अवैज्ञानिक, परंपरा…..कुछ सोचते नहीं….जो आस -पास के लोग कहते जाते हैं…वो आपका  शरीर करता जाता है.

हम सब जीवन में एकाधिक बार इस कठिन घड़ी को पार करते हैं.

वो 28 दिसम्बर 2017 की हाड़ कंपाती ठंढ वाली सुबह थी, कोहरा इतना घना कि अपने हाथ को दूसरा हाथ भी दिखायी न दे. हमें कहा गया था कि सुबह 8.00 बजे से पहले शमशान के उस चबूतरे पर पहुँच जाना है, जहाँ कल हमारे पिता जी का दाह संस्कार हुआ था तभी हमें उनकी अस्थियाँ मिल सकेंगी. सुनसान सड़क पर मैं और मोहन एक खाली मटकी और पूजा का सामान लेकर शमशान की ओर चल दिए. अजब सी बात थी, ठंढ बहुत थी पर हमें शायद लग नहीं रही थी, कुछ दिख भी नहीं रहा था, पर हम जा रहे थे.

वो 17 वें क्रमांक का चबूतरा था. पंडित जी हमें देखते ही पहुँच गए. किसी लेटे हुए व्यक्ति के आकार का और लगभग उतना ही ऊंचा राख का एक ढेर. जीवन यही है….शेष राख….ये सोचने का या दार्शनिक होने का समय नहीं मिला. पंडित जी ने मुझे पूजा के लिए बैठा दिया. छोटी प्रक्रिया थी. फिर राख में दूध के छीटें डलवाए और अपना हाथ राख के उस गर्म ढेर में डाल दिया….

अगले क्षण चेहरे पर अत्यंत उत्साह और प्रसन्नता के साथ एक अस्थि सा कुछ जो संगमरमर की तरह श्वेत था, मुझे देते हुए बोले, अरे…आपके तो आत्माराम मिल गए. मेरे लिए इसका न कोई अर्थ था न महत्व. मेरा और मोहन दोनों का चेहरा भावशून्य सा ही था, लेकिन उनका उत्साह कम नहीं हुआ…..अरे, आप लोग बहुत भाग्यवान हो….जानते हो हज़ारों चिताएं जलती हैं तब कहीं एक में आत्माराम मिलते हैं….इसमें हमारा भी यश होता है….लोग जीवन भर दाह संस्कार कराते हैं लेकिन आत्माराम के दर्शन नहीं होते……आप इसे अलग पकड़िये…….फिर उन्होंने उस अस्थि का  दूध से अभिषेक कराया…कुछ पूजा करायी और जो खली मटकी हम लेकर गए थे उसमें नीचे फूल बिछाकर उसे स्थापित कराया………वो मटकी से हमारे पिता जी का अस्थिकलश हो गयी थी.

कुछ और अस्थियाँ पंडित जी ने उसमें रखीं, कुछ और विधियाँ की……..दक्षिणा के प्रति भी पंडित जी उदासीन ही थे, वो आत्माराम के मिल जाने से बहुत प्रसन्न थे. …..और फिर मैं और मोहन अस्थि कलश लेकर घर की तरफ चल दिए….अगले दिन सुबह अस्थि विसर्जन के लिए प्रयाग जाना था…..

लौटने हुए रास्ते में यूँ ही….कुछ आत्माराम शब्द और कुछ पंडित जी का उत्साह….बार बार याद आ रहा था ….शायद ये कुछ खास था…मैंने दिमाग पर जोर डालकर मोहन से कहा, “मोहन, वो अस्थि, पहले तो कशेरुका सी लगी, लेकिन वो कशेरुका नहीं थी……..वो एक ऐसी छोटी श्वेत मूर्ति सी थी…जैसे कोई योगी ध्यान मुद्रा में बैठा हो…..जैसे ..गौतम बुद्ध ….ऐसी तो कोई अस्थि नहीं होती मनुष्य के शरीर में …..क्या होगा फिर  ये”….. ……हम दोनों अब अतामाराम को जानने को व्याकुल हो रहे थे …….ऐसा क्या है जो कई हज़ार चिताओं में कभी मिलता है…..अस्थि होगी तो सभी चिताओं में होगी……यह एक नया अध्याय सा था …जिसके विषय में हमने कभी कुछ नहीं सुना था…………पंडित जी के चेहरे का उत्साह हमें आत्माराम को जानने के लिए प्रेरित कर रहा था.

गूगल करता हूँ दीदी…..और फिर पता चला ….गूगल  को भी लगभग उतना ही पता था और वो ही सवाल थे, जो हमारे मन में थे…

“आत्माराम” जो एक अस्थि मानी जाती है, कई हज़ार चितायें जलने पर किसी एक में निकलती है और कहते हैं ये वो शरीर होते हैं, जिनकी आत्माएं पवित्र से भी पवित्र और ईश्वर के एकदम निकट होती हैं……………..इस प्रश्न का उत्तर केवल भारतीय आध्यामिक परम्परा ही दे सकती है क्योंकि-

अगर वो अस्थि होती तो हर शरीर में होती. लेकिन मानव शरीर में इस आकार प्रकार की कोई अस्थि नहीं होती.

अगर वो अस्थि होती तो दूसरी अस्थियों की तरह जली हुयी होती – लेकिन….वो तो एक निष्काम  योगी की संगमरमर प्रतिमा सी थी …

सवाल तो रहेंगे …लेकिन मेरे पिता जी सच में पवित्र से भी पवित्र ..ईश्वर के समीप थे.. ये विश्वास और दृढ़  हो गया ….

मैं और मोहन…….अब भी आत्माराम की बात करते रहते हैं……पता नहीं शायद हम ये रहस्य कभी सुलझा भी लें……

पोषण अभियान: सही पोषण – देश रोशन

0

भारत सरकार द्वारा कुपोषण को दूर करने के लिए जीवनचक्र एप्रोच अपनाकर चरणबद्ध ढंग से पोषण अभियान चलाया जा रहा है, भारत सरकार द्वारा 0 से 06 वर्ष तक के बच्चों एवं गर्भवती एवं धात्री माताओ के स्वास्थ्य एवं पोषण स्तर में समयबद्ध तरीके से सुधार हेतु महत्वाकांक्षी राष्ट्रीय पोषण मिशन का गठन किया गया है राष्ट्रीय पोषण मिशन अर्न्तगत कुपोषण को चरणबद्ध तरीके से दूर करने के लिए आगामी 03 वर्षो के लिए लक्ष्य निर्धारित किये गये है-

उद्देश्य एवं लक्ष्य :1. 0-6 वर्ष के बच्चों में ठिगनेपन से बचाव एवं इसमें कुल 6 प्रतिशत,प्रति वर्ष 2%की दर से कमी लाना।2. 0 से 6 वर्ष के बच्चों का अल्प पोषण से बचाव एवं इसमें कुल 6 प्रतिशत, प्रति वर्ष2%की दर से कमी लाना ।3. 6 से 59 माह के बच्चों में एनीमिया के प्रसार मेंकुल 9 प्रतिशत,प्रति वर्ष 3%की दर से कमी लाना ।4. 15 से 49 वर्ष की किशोरियों, गर्भवती एवं धात्री माताओं में एनीमिया के प्रसार में कुल 9 प्रतिशत,प्रति वर्ष 3%की दर से कमी लाना ।5. कम वजन के साथ जन्म लेने वाले बच्चों की संख्या में कुल 6 प्रतिशत,प्रति वर्ष 2%की दर से कमी लाना ।

यूनिसेफ के प्रतिनिधि यस्मिन अली हक ने सरकार के पोषण अभियान की प्रशंसा की। इस अभियान के द्वारा कुपोषण की शिकार तथा एनीमिया से पीड़ित महिलायें लाभान्वित हो रहीं हैं। यह कुपोषण को समाप्त करने के लिए एक बड़ा कदम है।

प्रमुख बिंदु

पोषण अभियान के तहत आवंटित धन के उपयोग के मामले में सबसे अच्छा प्रदर्शन मिज़ोरम का रहा जिसने अपने लिये आवंटित कुल धन का लगभग 66 प्रतिशत हिस्सा प्रयोग किया। ज्ञात हो कि अभियान के तहत मिज़ोरम को तीन वर्षों में 1979.03 लाख रुपए दिये जाए जिसमें से उसने कुल 1310.52 लाख रुपए प्रयोग किये। वहीं इस मामले में सबसे खराब प्रदर्शन पंजाब का रहा जिसने कुल आवंटित धन का मात्र 0.45 प्रतिशत धन ही उपयोग किया। पंजाब को तीन वर्षों की अवधि में कुल 6909.84 लाख रुपए जारी किये गए जिसमें से उसने मात्र 30.88 लाख रुपए प्रयोग किये। विदित है कि ओडिशा और पश्चिम बंगाल ने अब तक अपने-अपने राज्यों में इस योजना को कार्यान्वयित नहीं किया है। हालाँकि ओडिशा सरकार ने हाल ही में राज्य के अंतर्गत अभियान के कार्यान्वयन को मंज़ूरी दे दी थी, परंतु पश्चिम बंगाल में अभी भी योजना का क्रियान्वयन बाकी है।विशेषज्ञों का मानना है की फंड के उपयोग को लेकर मंत्रालय द्वारा प्रस्तुत आँकड़े पोषण अभियान की एक गंभीर तस्वीर प्रस्तुत करते हैं। पोषण अभियान(POSHAN Abhiyaan)दिसंबर 2017 में महिला एवं बाल विकास मंत्रालय ने देशभर में कुपोषण की समस्या को संबोधित करने हेतु पोषण अभियान की शुरुआत की थी। अभियान का उद्देश्य परिणामोन्मुखी दृष्टिकोण के माध्यम से देश भर के छोटे बच्चों, किशोरियों और महिलाओं में कुपोषण तथा एनीमिया को चरणबद्ध तरीके से कम करना है। इस उद्देश्य की प्राप्ति हेतु अभियान के तहत राज्य और केंद्रशासित प्रदेशों के सभी ज़िलों को शामिल किया गया है। पोषण अभियान या राष्ट्रीय पोषण मिशन की अभिकल्पना नीति आयोग द्वारा ‘राष्ट्रीय पोषण रणनीति’ के तहत की गई है। इस रणनीति का उद्देश्य वर्ष 2022 तक “कुपोषण मुक्त भारत” का निर्माण करना है। इस अभियान का लक्ष्य लगभग 9046.17 करोड़ रुपए के बजट के साथ देश भर के 10 करोड़ लोगों को लाभ पहुँचाना है। अभियान की कुल लागत का 50 प्रतिशत हिस्सा बजटीय समर्थन के माध्यम से दिया जा रहा है, जबकि शेष 50 प्रतिशत हिस्सा विश्व बैंक तथा अन्य बहुपक्षीय विकास बैंकों द्वारा दिया जा रहा है। बजटीय समर्थन के माध्यम से दिये जा रहे हिस्से को तीन भागों में बाँटा गया है: (1) पूर्वोत्तर और हिमालयी राज्यों के लिये 90:10 जिसमें 90 प्रतिशत केंद्र द्वारा दिया जाएगा 10 प्रतिशत राज्यों द्वारा (2) बिना विधायिका के केंद्रशासित प्रदेशों कि स्थिति में 100 प्रतिशत केंद्र द्वारा दिया जाएगा (3) अन्य राज्यों की स्थिति में 60:40 जिसमें 60 प्रतिशत केंद्र द्वारा दिया जाएगा और 40 प्रतिशत राज्यों द्वारा। अभियान का प्रभाव हालाँकि पोषण अभियान के परिणामों को कार्यक्रम की स्वीकृत अवधि पूरी होने के बाद ही जाना जा सकता है, परंतु इस संदर्भ में व्यापक राष्ट्रीय पोषण सर्वेक्षण (Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey-CNNS) के आँकड़ों पर गौर किया जा सकता है। स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय तथा यूनिसेफ (UNICEF) द्वारा आयोजित व्यापक राष्ट्रीय पोषण सर्वेक्षण के आँकड़ों के अनुसार, 5 वर्ष से कम आयु वर्ग के बच्चों में से 34.7% बच्चे स्टंटिंग अर्थात् कद न बढ़ने की समस्या का सामना कर रहे हैं, वहीं इसी आयु वर्ग के 33.4% बच्चे अल्प-वज़न की समस्या से जूझ रहे हैं। आगे की राह पोषण अभियान के तहत आवंटित धन के उपयोग संबंधी आँकड़े स्पष्ट रूप से इस अभियान के प्रति राज्य सरकारों की गैर-ज़िम्मेदारी प्रदर्शित करते हैं।

प्रमुख उद्देश्य

गर्भवती महिलाएं

रोज़ाना आयरन और विटामिन युक्त तरह-तरह के पोषक आहार लें।पौष्टिकीकृत दूध और तेल तथा आयोडीन युक्त नमक खायें ।आई.एफ.ए. की एक लाल गोली रोज़ाना, चौथे महीने से 180 दिन तक लें।
कैल्शियम की निर्धारित खुराक लें।एक एल्बेण्डाजोल की गोली दूसरी तिमाही में लें । ऊंचे स्थान पर ढक कर रखा हुआ शुद्ध पानी ही पीयें।प्रसव से पहले कम से कम चार ए.एन.सी. जांच ए.एन.एम. दीदी या डॉक्टर से ज़रूर करवायें। नज़दीकी अस्पताल या चिकित्सा केन्द्र पर ही अपना प्रसव करायें। व्यक्तिगत साफ-सफाई और स्वच्छता का ध्यान रखें।खाना खाने से पहले साबुन से हाथ ज़रूर धोयें। शौच के बाद साबुन से हाथ अवश्य धोयें। हमेशा शौचालय का इस्तेमाल करें।धात्री महिलाएंरोज़ाना आयरन और विटामिन युक्त तरह-तरह के पोषक आहार लें। पौष्टिकीकृत दूध और तेल तथा आयोडीन युक्त नमक खायें। प्रसव से लेकर 6 महीने तक (180 दिन) रोज़ाना आई.एफ.ए. की एक लाल गोली लें। कैल्शियम की निर्धारित खुराक लें । ऊंचे स्थान पर ढक कर रखा हुआ शुद्ध पानी ही पीयें।नवजात शिशु को जन्म के एक घंटे के अंदर स्तनपान शुरू करायें तथा शिशु को अपना पहला पीला गाढ़ा दूध पिलायें। मां का पहला पीला गाढ़ा दूध बच्चे का पहला टीका होता है। शिशु को शुरुआती 6 महीने सिर्फ अपना दूध ही पिलायें और ऊपर से कुछ न दें। व्यक्तिगत और अपने बच्चे की स्वच्छता का ध्यान रखें।खाना बनाने तथा खाना खाने से पहले साबुन से हाथ ज़रूर धोयें।बच्चे का शौच निपटाने के बाद और अपने शौच के बाद साबुन से हाथ अवश्य धोयें। बच्चे का शौच निपटान और अपने शौच के लिए हमेशा शौचालय का इस्तेमाल करें।
बच्चे महीने पूरे होने पर मां के दूध के साथ ऊपरी आहार शुरू करें। रोज़ाना आयरन और विटामिन युक्त तरह-तरह के पोषक आहार दें। मसला हुआ और गाढ़ा पौष्टिक ऊपरी आहार दें।पौष्टिकीकृत दूध और तेल तथा आयोडीन युक्त नमक खायें।आई.एफ.ए. और विटामिन-ए की निर्धारित खुराक दिलवायें। पेट के कीड़ों से बचने के लिये 12 से 24 महीने के बच्चे को एल्बेण्डाज़ोल की आधी गोली तथा 24 से 59 महीने के बच्चे को एक गोली साल में दो बार आंगनवाड़ी केन्द्र पर दिलवायें ।आंगनवाड़ी केन्द्र पर नियमित रूप से लेकर जायें तथा उसका वज़न अवश्य करवायें। बौद्धिक विकास के लिये पौष्टिक आहार उसकी उम्र के अनुसार आंगनवाड़ी कार्यकर्ता, आशा, ए.एन.एम. या डॉक्टर द्वारा बतायी गयी मात्रा के अनुसार दें। 5 साल की उम्र तक सूची अनुसार सभी टीके नियमित रूप से ज़रूर लगवायें।व्यक्तिगत साफ-सफाई और स्वच्छता की आदत डलवायें। ऊंचे स्थान पर ढक कर रखा हुआ शुद्ध पानी ही पिलायें। खाना खाने और खिलाने से पहले साबुन से हाथ ज़रूर धोयें। शौच के बाद साबुन से हाथ अवश्य धोयें। उम्र अनुसार बच्चे के साथ खेलें एवं बातचीत करें। बच्चे के शौच का निपटान हमेशा शौचालय में करें।
किशोरियां: किशोरियों को रोज़ाना आयरन और विटामिन युक्त तरह-तरह के पौष्टिक आहार ज़रूर खिलायें जिससे माहवारी के दौरान रक्त स्राव से होने वाली आयरन की कमी पूरी कर उसका संपूर्ण विकास हो। पौष्टिकीकृत दूध और तेल तथा आयोडीन युक्त नमक खायें।आई.एफ.ए. की एक नीली गोली हफ्ते में एक बार लें। व्यक्तिगत साफ-सफाई और माहवारी स्वच्छता का ध्यान रखें।पेट के कीड़ों से बचने के लिये एल्बेण्डाजोल की एक गोली साल में दो बार लें। ऊंचे स्थान पर ढक कर रखा हुआ शुद्ध पानी ही पीयें। खाना खाने से पहले साबुन से हाथ ज़रूर धोयें। शौच के बाद साबुन से हाथ अवश्य धोयें। हमेशा शौचालय का इस्तेमाल करें

देशभर में कुपोषण और एनीमिया जैसी गंभीर समस्याओं से निपटने के लिये एक सक्रिय तंत्र की आवश्यकता है और राज्य सरकारों के सहयोग के बिना इस तंत्र का निर्माण संभव नहीं है।अतः आवश्यक है की राज्य सरकारें इस ओर गंभीरता से ध्यान दें ताकि इस समस्या को जल्द-से-जल्द समाप्त किया जा सके।

डॉ. स्वप्नील बी. मंत्री बालरोग चिकित्सक

Mindfulness in the times of COVID 19

COVID 19 has had an impact globally on a large scale. The Indian government has implemented a lock down to ensure the containment of the virus – meaning following the social distancing measures, schools and businesses closing, and companies declaring work from home as mandatory except those involved in essential services and medical fraternity, we are all forced to face a new reality.

“Man is a social animal,” said Aristotle. We like to bond, engage and be close to people, and we are now forced to change our behavior, which can create a feeling of loneliness. While it may feel like life has come to a standstill, there are ways to keep these times in perspective and learn how to move on. We need to remind ourselves that COVID-19 is a grave but temporary illness, and that life will soon return to normal in sometime.

However, while we are still in the grips of the deadly virus which has not yet shown signs of tapering down, it is totally understandable that most of us may be already be showing signs of loneliness, feelings of fear, stress, constant worry, different levels of anxiousness by the constantly bombarding alerts and media coverage regarding the spread of the virus.

While it is important to stay up to date on the developments that are happening in your vicinity and the world at large, let me get you started on few tips on “How to be Mindful”, while continuing to lookafter yourself and your family membersduring these tough times.

  • Be Mindful about how long you spend your time on watching news on Covid-19. Please LIMIT SCREEN TIME about COVID-19
  • Be Mindful about your discussions with reference to COVID 19 as it can increase or decrease your child’s fear. ENSURE you take time to engage your family in discussions other than Covid-19
  • Be Mindful of your breathing. PRACTISEDEEP BREATHING along with your family /children as a method to calm the nervous system.
  • Mindfully place the spotlight on the positive of the situation by celebrating more time with family. Play games, do family projects, allow children to connect with friends and relatives virtually etc.
  • Be Mindful about sticking to routines as children thrive on routines. PUT IN PLACE A ROUTINE for the days under lockdown as it ensures a sense of control and well being for your child.
  • Be Mindful of your interactions with your child. WATCHING WITH INTENT will open up to you his actions for any hints and indications that they may want to talk to you, such as hovering around you during your household chores or asking a few questions about the pandemic and going back to play and then coming back again with a few more.
  • Be Mindful of how you respond to your child’s queries, THE KEY here is to keep it short and simple. The answers should be honest and age appropriate. Tell the facts without creating fear and anxiety. Remind them that grown ups are working to take care of the situation.

May you be safe.

May you be healthy.

May you be peaceful

May you live with ease.

Dr. Swathi Menon

Academic Head

www.indoscotsglobalschool.com

A case of conditional feminism

0

Sushant Singh Rajput was found dead on June 14, 2020 leaving entire India shocked. People grieved his untimely demise as if he was a family member. He was an amazing actor, an intelligent person and most importantly a humble man with whom middle class people could connect. He was one of us. When we see film actors throwing tantrums, giving a cold shoulder to people who made them what they are, or even show arrogance as if they own ‘film industry’. Well, in a way it is correct too as power to make or break a talent is with the selected few in Bollywood, or Bullywood as Kangana Ranaut calls it.

After Sushant’s murder, there was a calm for a few days and then Kangna Ranaut was interviewed by Arnab Goswami where she opened up on her struggle in Bollywood as an outsider and gave shocking details about how Sushant was banned by the major film production houses after he refused one film by Yash Raj. Kangna talked about bullying, how talent from outside of film industry targeted and suppressed to make a way for their own. She even quoted Tapsee Pannu from her interview where she called herself as a B-Grade actor. Kangna said that both Swara and Tapsee are better actresses and better looking than Ananya and Alia but still don’t get what they deserve as they are outsiders!

A sane person would appreciate that but Swara and Tapsee acted too egoistic to understand the statement. They openly stood against Kangana and many feminists jumped to stand with them. What about Kangna, you ask? She risked her career to expose and reveal the mightiest of the industry, did any feminist stand with her? No. That is how feminism works it seems. 

In another interview, Kangna revealed about drug parties and how newcomer girls in the industry are ‘introduced’ to elderly group of men in Dubai, how they are drugged and hallucinated. She said that Sushant was a victim of cunningness around him. Guess what, still media tried to let go of such major revelations. No feminist asked for safer working environment for women, no tweets in her support, none of her colleagues from film industry supported her too.

A couple of days later, Rhea’s PR team arranged two interviews for her- NDTV and AajTak. As per Sudhir Chaudhary, he was approached for the interview too provided he used their’ script for questioning her, which he denied. It is worth applauding that a girl whose net income in the last couple of days was 12-14 lacs per annum, who has a loan of 50 lacs and pays monthly instalment of 17,000 Rs is able to afford the costliest lawyer and a PR team to work for her.

As soon as her interview came out, feminists came out of their holes to give her a benefit of doubt. They shamed ‘media trails’ (not the ones in which Rhea presented her case though). Feminists want people to let Rhea ‘innocent till proven guilty’ despite so many inconsistencies and proofs of her talking about drugs and discussing how to give drugs to Sushant- tea or coffee. Despite this, Bhaskar, Pannu and now Vidhya Balan want people not to judge Rhea but none utter a word to support Kangana, who risked her life, career and security to speak what we all know today.

Is it not a clear case of film industry working as a unit in who to support and who to boycott? Why is the definition of feminism so shallow that a woman would support another woman ONLY if her agenda is met? Are we giving the right environment to our future generations? Isn’t this a vital period to introspect and change ourselves a bit? Should we not support the right for once? What is the need of hypocrisy every time? Why are people oblivious of the pain of a 74-year old father and sisters? Had Sushant been their son or brother would Tapsees and Bhaskars and Lakshmi and Balans said the same? Why is an achiever middle class person not accepted by the riches? Was a boy too much a threat? Is Kangna too bold and truthful that others are scared of being swept away? Is their position so weak? Do we still need feminism or do we need humanism?

“हिंदुत्व” भारतवर्ष की उदारता एवं मानवता के श्रेष्ठ गुणों का निचोड़ है

आज देश में “हिंदुत्व” एक प्रमुख चर्चा का विषय बन चूका है। वर्षों से वामपंथी विद्वानों द्वारा हिंदुत्व का गलत व्याख्या कर उसकी विकृत परिभाषा गढ़ने का प्रयास होता रहा है। अर्थात उनके अनुसार हिंदुत्व का मतलब सांप्रदायिकता को बढ़ावा देना, हिंदुत्व का मतलब हिंदू तालिबान को बढ़ावा देना. आदि आदि विचार वामपंथी विद्वानों के द्वारा समय समय पर दिए जाते रहे हैं। देश के अंदर एक ऐसा वातावरण का निर्माण उन तथाकथित विद्वानों के माध्यम से किया जाता रहा है कि जो जितना अधिक हिंदुत्व को गाली देगा, वह उतना बड़ा धर्मनिरपेक्ष और जो जितना अधिक हिंदुत्व की बात करेगा वह उतना ही बड़ा संप्रदायिक होगा। क्या हिंदुत्व के संबंध में इस प्रकार के विचार रखना उचित है ? क्या हिंदुत्व की यही मूल भावना है?

निश्चित रूप से जो लोग हिंदुत्व के प्रति इसप्रकार का दुराग्रह एवं लघु निरर्थक धारणा रखते हैं, वह उसके महान संस्कृति परंपरा से अनभिज्ञ हैं। तथा धार्मिक संकीर्णता में जी रहे हैं। हिंदुत्व भारत की परंपरा एवं राष्ट्रीय पहचान है जो सभी मतो एवं पंथों  को जोड़ने में सर्वाधिक सफल सिद्ध रही है। “सर्वे भवन्तु सुखिनः” “वसुधैव कुटुम्बकम” धर्म चक्र परिवर्तनार्थ” “सत्यमेव जयते” इत्यादि आखिरी किस राष्ट्र-संस्कृति की वाणी है? अन्य धर्मों तथा राष्ट्रों के प्रति उदारता से सोचने की बात बाकी दुनिया के किसी धर्म में नहीं है चाहे वह ईसायत  हो या इस्लाम।

हिंदुत्व कोई पूजा पद्धति नहीं है। हिंदुस्तान के अंदर सैकड़ों पूजा पद्धतियां है और वह सबको मान्यता देता है। हिंदुत्व भारतवर्ष की विशालता, उदारता एवं मानवता के श्रेष्ठ गुणों का निचोड़ है। हिंदुत्व ! धर्म का पर्यायवाची है जो व्यक्ति और समाज में पारंपरिक सामाजिक समरसता, संतुलन तथा मोक्ष प्राप्ति के लिए सहायक तत्व को स्पष्ट करता हैl यह एक जीवन दर्शन एवं जीवन पद्धति है जो दुनिया की मानवता में विद्यमान समस्याओं को सुलझाने में सहायक है। अभी तक हिंदुत्व को मजहब या संप्रदाय के समानार्थक मानकर उसकी गलत व्याख्या की गई।  क्योंकि मजहब/संप्रदाय पूजा की पद्धति है, जबकि हिंदुत्व एक दर्शन है। जो मानव जीवन पर समग्रता से विचार करता है। समाजवाद और साम्यवाद नैतिकता पर आधारित राजनीतिक एवं आर्थिक दर्शन है। जबकि हिंदुत्व वह दर्शन है जो मनुष्य की भौतिक आवश्यकताओं के अतिरिक्त उसकी मानसिक, बौद्धिक एवं भावनात्मक आवश्यकताओं की पूर्ति करता है। पिछले दिनों मैंने पूर्व राष्ट्रपति डॉ राधाकृष्णन की पुस्तक “द हिन्दू व्यू ऑफ लाइफ” पढ़ी। जिसमे वह लिखते हैं की “हम हिंदुत्व के व्यवहारिक भाग को देखें तो पायेगें की यह जीवन पद्धति है। नास्तिक अथवा सभी हिंदू हो सकते हैं, बशर्ते वे हिंदू संस्कृति और जीवन पद्धति को अपनाते हों।” हिंदुत्व कोई संप्रदाय नहीं है, अपितु उन लोगों का समुदाय है जो सत्य को पाने के लिए प्रयत्नशील हैं। इसी प्रकार इंग्लैंड के एक महान लेखक अपनी पुस्तक “द एसेंशियल टीचिंग ऑफ हिन्दूज्म” में लिखते हैं कि “आज हम जिस संस्कृति को हिंदू संस्कृति के रूप में जानते हैं, और जिसे भारतीय सनातन धर्म है या नियम कहते हैं, वह मजहब से बड़ा सिद्धांत है। जिस मजहब को पश्चिम के लोग समझते हैं।

इस प्रकार अंत में यह कहना उचित होगा कि हिंदुत्व ही राष्ट्रीयत्व है। जहां हिंदुत्व घटा, देश वहां बटां। पूर्वोत्तर के राज्य तथा जम्मू-कश्मीर इसका ज्वलंत प्रमाण है।

“लोका समस्ता सुखिनो भवंतु”

वीरेन्द्र पांडेय (लेखक सहायक आचार्य एवं शोधकर्ता हैं)

The pandemic disrupting the future of millions of underprivileged children

0

There is nothing that has not been disrupted by the borderless invisible enemy, the COVID 19, originating in China. The impact of this pandemic is too deep and wide, beyond all expectations, which we will reminisce and analyze long after 2020. Besides the global impacts such as unimaginable loss of human lives, an unprecedented economic slowdown, the derailed intellectual and career advancement, hundreds of millions of school-age children from economically disadvantaged families are the worst affected, particularly, in the developing and under-developed countries.

They have been out of the school since March when “shutdowns” went into effect. Most of them lost the opportunity for intellectual and social development and group learning. We won’t know the long-term consequences of the “stay home” for such a long time on their physical, emotional, and mental health. The questions include; should the school open at all and if yes, how? Should the school year be abandoned or should the children be promoted to the next grade without adequate learning? What would their learning deficiencies mean in the long run? We have many such questions and no concrete answers.

The shutdowns prompted the use of distance education such as online, radio, television, or other distance learning modes to lessen learning interruptions. It was a well-intentioned effort but the longstanding deep Digital Divide and inequalities in the socio-economic status of people deprived many children globally. The question is what are the next steps while we are still faced with coronavirus with no end in sight?

Our focus is on the children in rural India’s government schools which serve the educational aspirations for economically disadvantaged families. The discussion is perhaps equally applicable to other developing and under-developed countries. The discussion is based on anecdotal conversations by the author with Vidya Gyan networked teachers. The author has spent the last five years on the ground learning about school education in rural areas. Vidya Gyan is a nonprofit which has been active for about five years in improving the learning environments of rural government schools in India.

Current Status: With the sudden school closures, the teachers were directed to use distance learning without much training, tools, and financial resources. They accepted the challenge just because of their students’ learning was at stake. Many conscientious teachers used their smartphones but not too surprisingly, fewer children had access to smartphones to engage in a two-way interaction with teachers. In the most optimistic scenario, perhaps 90% of children in rural government schools have been deprived of learning for the last 5 months and are likely to remain in that state for the foreseeable future. The schools may not be safe to reopen the way they generally functioned until a vaccine or other pharmaceutical means become available.

Denmark has successfully continued schools for several months with strict social distancing but no masks. Their philosophy included relatively small groups of students staying together in all classes but no mixing with other groups. Denmark succeeded because the teacher unions, officials, and the local community worked together. The U.S. school systems are using different models in different jurisdictions but the hybrid (a mix of face-to-face and distance learning) is perhaps more common. India must devise its own model but take advantage of what other countries have done.

In government schools in Uttar Pradesh (perhaps true in other States too), the teachers are coming to school every day and we hope that they are eager to engage in teaching because they care about the learning of their pupils. However, the students are not allowed to return to the classroom for the obvious fear of infection. We suggest a model which is based on our informed view that ‘Every Child Matters’ and deserves an EQUAL learning opportunity for learning, unlike the current situation in which only about 10% are able to access distance learning.

PLAUSIBLE IMMEDIATE SOLUTION: India has managed the pandemic relatively well considering her population, diversity, and wide socioeconomic disparities. The leadership down to the district level deserves credit for good management under the most extenuating circumstances and for making decisions with speed over precision and prioritizing public health as a common good in the national interest. Extraordinary measures like total shutdown and travel ban were enforced rapidly to combat the spread of coronavirus leading to a relatively low number of deaths and infections. Now, it is time to focus on public education with the same speed and determination to keep the children engaged in learning and not let millions of them compromise their dream of education, career, and wellbeing.

While India must develop broad guidelines, each district must be empowered to lead in good faith recognizing that there are no rewards without some risk. Simply put, implement the extraordinary measures to deal with the most unprecedented coronavirus but remain flexible, vigilant, and prepared for rapid deployment of best safety measures as and when warranted. It is no different than what India has successfully demonstrated and done in managing public health issues so far.

Based on our careful analysis and using knowledge of India’s school system, a LIMITED HYBRID LEARNING model is best suited requiring:

  1. Strict enforcement of SMS ( Social distancing, Masks, and Sanitization) for safety in the schools. Every child must be given at least two cloth masks and required to use it. In Uttar Pradesh, they are getting masks with their dresses.
  2. No MDM to be served at the school (Currently, parents are getting MDM equivalent money transferred in their accounts).
  3. Divide each class into small groups of 5-7. Each group should come to the school at least two times a week depending on the school enrollment, the physical size of the classrooms, and how many staff members. One group size will not fit all and thus each school should be empowered to propose the group size and class duration for accommodating children safely.
  4. Teachers should record their classroom instruction if possible and share it with those at home recognizing that everyone will not be able to access it (no different than now).
  5. Why bring children to school? This model will allow every student to have social interaction with peers, some group learning, and the teacher will get to make some level of student learning assessment. Teachers will give instructions and assign and collect homework each time the children are in the school. This will offer “equal access and opportunity” for most children rather than only a small percentage receiving instructions/homework by phone. Recently, Vidya Gyan received an unusual request for printers. Why unusual? Because we had not thought about it until the teachers told us that they are writing homework by hand and sharing only with a limited number of students because only so much one can do by hand. The printers will allow them to print homework and distribute it. Vidya Gyan will provide printers to a few schools because of the limited resources but the larger solution is that if the children come to school a couple of times, they can copy homework from the blackboard, do it at home, and bring it back next time. That is why, we emphasize children coming to school at least twice a week even if it is 90-minute interaction with teachers/peers.

Model 1 A : School opening 6 days; 5 teachers, and 100, 150 and 200 children. For modelling and discussion, we assume that each class has approximately the same number of students e.g. 20 students in each class with 100 children in the school.

100 children (4 groups of 5 in each class)             150 (6 groups of 5) and 200 (6 groups of 7)

8.30-10.30          11.00-1.00                                        8.30-10.30          11.00-1.00

Mon       Group A               Group B                                  Group A               Group B

Tues       Group C               Group D                                 Group C               Group D

Wed.     same as Monday                                                 Group E               Group F

Thu.       Same as Tuesday                                                           Same as Monday

Fri.         Same as Monday                                                           Same as Tuesday

Sat.        Same as Tuesday                                                           Same as Wednesday

Model 1B: School open only 4 or 5 days: (a) 100 children schools will come only twice a week. (b) Schools with larger enrollment will have only 90 minutes long periods twice a week.

Model 2A : School opening 6 days; only 4 teachers and 100, 150 and 200 children.

(a) 100 children: Combine class 1 and 2 (40 kids); classes 3, 4, and 5 (20 each): Make the groups of 7 for the combined class and groups of 5 for others. Use the model shown above.

(b) 150 children (challenging): Combine class 1 and half of 2 (45); half of 2 and 3 (45); class 4 and 5 (30 each): Divide each classes in 6 groups and have them in school twice a week.

(c) 200 children (very challenging with 4 teachers)

Model 2B: School opening only 4 or 5 days: Groups of 7 kids with reduced class time of 90 minutes and 3 groups each day (for example 8.30-10.00; 10.15- 11.45; 12.00-1.30).

It is important to acknowledge that implementing change is not easy but in the pandemic environment, we must do the best we can in good faith. The national lockdown was to save lives in the long run which India did relatively well. Likewise, the proposed partial school opening is an effort to offer the level playing field for learning to all children rather than about 90% not learning at all. We cannot rule out anybody falling sick but we can be prepared like India was during the mass migration of labor force to U.P., Bihar, etc. from other States. The alternative of little or no learning for about 90% of children for the next 4-6 months means a total loss of one school year for millions of underprivileged children. This will mean delaying their further education/career by at least one year and at worst, losing them altogether from further education.

LONG TERM STRATEGY: India should consider the following:

  1. Cancel most holidays including summer/winter breaks and ask the schools to observe essential festivals/national holidays as much as possible at the school.
  2. Combine school years 2020-21 and 2021-22 (say January 2021 to March 2022) as a continuum to complete the curriculum of two consecutive years to minimize the loss of learning. This will allow the school year 2022-23 back on track on April 1, 2022.

While there is no one size fit all solution for COVID19 pandemic, we must do the best possible in good faith. The national lockdown was to save lives in the long run. Likewise, the partial school opening will allow children some learning. We cannot rule out anybody falling sick but we can be prepared like India was during the mass migration of laborers. The alternative of little or no learning for the next 4-6 months means a total loss of one school year for millions of children. This means delaying their further education/career by at least one year.

The pandemic accompanied a rude awakening that public education and public health are the fabric of any society. However, neither was well funded and/or managed globally. Even the most powerful country, the United States, found itself unprepared. Consequently, with only 5% of the world population in the U.S., there have been over 6 million (and counting) people infected with COVID, a whopping ~25%.of the global count. In the U.S., children’s education was quickly changed to distance education using the internet and laptops. How much of their intellectual, social, mental, and physical development is going to be impacted will be a subject of study for the years to come.

According to the United Nations, low and middle-income countries already faced an education funding gap of nearly $1.5 trillion dollars/year even before the crisis. This gap is now bound to grow. It will be critical that education is at the heart of domestic budget increase as well as international monetary development assistance is forthcoming. All countries must invest in education including the bridging of the Digital Divide and building infrastructure for public health and education. We had not anticipated COVID19 and no one has a crystal ball for the future for what and when may occur?