Sabarimala verdict

Women who just want to enter the temple for the sake of women empowerment should focus their struggle on other fundamental issues. There are issues of women's security, education, health, political participation, etc.

The state has, from its Nehruvian beginnings, supported the Communists whose primary aim has been the demonization of popular Hinduism, which is termed as 'secularism'.

Now that the SC has ordered something that is against the temple commandment, will temple perform Punyaham?

Not just Sabarimala, but there is no specific sanction in any Hindu scriptures to impose gender bias in Temples: did supreme court not review Hindu scriptures before passing its judgement?

While working on Sabarimala and Ayodhya issue, SC must remember that Justice being served must be equitable not blind to sensitivities of the Society.

Activism has come to India following practices of activists in developed world. The activists sometimes appear to be rather adamant n prone to confronts and often seem to be distanced from the local culture and traditions and politicized.

Trupti Desai who should have taken her fight on foot and walked to Sabarimala when denied cabs, instead flied back. Is this a persistence of a genuine activist?

People of India in general and people of Kerala in particular must reply through ballot box towards the devilish atrocities of the left against Ayyappa devotes that too in the premises of Sabarimala temple.

Hindus were codified long ago when Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was the Prime Minister. Up to now, Muslim personal laws are not codified.

Hindus everywhere will have to answer the million-dollar question – Is Orthodoxy in tune with the mighty Vedas?