Sunday, October 27, 2024
Home Blog Page 790

Greater participation for a stronger democracy

“Greater participation for a stronger democracy” When I came across this slogan of the Election Commission of India, the first thing that came in my mind was: “Do we really participate to make our democracy strong?” For last 63 years since independence the ruling key has been in the hands of ill-informed and self-centered people belonging to one or the other major political party. Many of us don’t cast our votes for the same reason. However, I thought harping on the problem will not help and my responsibility needs to extend beyond getting a finger stained with that indelible ink after every five years.

This thought process resulted in discussion with various youngsters across India and it was felt that a platform is needed where youngsters could represent their society. This platform needs to be free from all ideologies, open for all and should be formed in a democratic manner. After many rounds of discussions, the name Youth Democratic Front (YDF) was chosen through voting.

And then began our struggle to get the front registered as a political party with the Election Commission of India. It is not easy for any organisation to get status of a political party. Apart from the mandatory paper work, the hindrances inherent to our bureaucratic system pulled us down every time we thought we have made it. Many sleepless nights were spent understanding laws and rules pertaining to registration. The office bearers and other core members of YDF belonged to various parts of the country including Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Chandigarh. Many of them were students while some were working and it was difficult to keep the flock together. Though it was tough for all of them to attend all the party meetings held in Delhi or Hyderabad, commitment to the cause remained the priority throughout.

Meanwhile, YDF started getting involved in various socio-political issues across the country and strongly advocated many issues of national interest. Our membership swelled from just four when we started our campaign in 2009 to around 5,000 by the time we applied for registration. Today, it stands at around 20,000. Along with rising number of supporters came threat calls and allurements from other groups especially youth wings of various political parties since we were addressing their vote bank. However, these incidents only strengthened our resolve to carry on with our mission. Registration of political parties is done under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The application with full particulars required under Section 29 A (4) of the Act and Registration of political parties (Furnishing of Additional Particulars) Order, 1992 should be sent to the Election Commission of India within 30 days of date of formation of the party. Any application made after the mentioned period is time-barred.

You have to submit a demand draft worth Rs 10,000 on account of non-refundable processing fee along with the memorandum/rules and bye-laws/constitution of your party containing a specific provision that “the party shall bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established, and to the principles of socialism, secularism and democracy and would uphold the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India”. The copy of the party constitution furnished with the application should also contain detailed provisions about all aspects of the party such as criteria for membership, election of office-bearers, and important committees, duties and powers of the office-bearers, provision regarding disciplinary action, etc.

Certified extracts from the latest electoral rolls of at least 100 members of the organisation, including all office-bearers and members of main decision making organs like executive committee, or attested photocopies of electoral photo identity cards of these members also need to be submitted along with an affidavit that no member of the organisation is a member of any other political party. Similar affidavits are also required from all 100 members.
It was difficult to obtain certified electoral rolls for all 100 members since they belonged to different states and voter I cards of several of them invited objections by the commission. Finally the application was submitted in June 2010 along with all the necessary documents but the commission kept raising one or the other objection from time to time. We were not dismayed by the objections but with the sporadic manner in which they were made forcing us to go through the whole process time and again.

Though the Election Commission is required to issue a notice for objections to the registration within one month of application submission, there was no such response to our application even after a delay of eight months. This also affected our plans to contest West Bengal Assembly elections. We had almost made up our mind to move the court against Election Commission but decided to make a last ditch attempt and wrote a humble letter to the Chief Election Commissioner of India.

Finally, the letter had its effect and the EC gave us a hearing on July 21. I went along with party’s joint secretary Deepak Aggrawal. There were many elderly and affluent people from various parts of the country sitting in the waiting room, who were surprised to see among themselves two guys in their 20s. We had been waiting for this moment to appear before the deputy election commissioner of India and other officials of the commission. They grilled us with questions on the values, Constitution and internal democracy which our party would stand for. We expressed our ideas about the party’s motive not to follow any of the isms prevalent in modern day politics and chart its own path of selfless service to the nation.

The officials seemed impressed and granted us an official identity in a single hearing whereas all other applicants were asked to come for the next round of hearing. This experience again strengthened our belief that to solve a social problem, the best solution has to be adopted after minutely scrutinising the situation without any preconceived bias of ideology. This belief itself serves as our ideology. The 2022 Assembly elections in Uttar Pradesh will see YDF contesting from at least 25 seats and we are sure of leaving our mark.

Suyash Deep Rai is the founder of Youth Democratic Front, a registered (Year 2011) political party. He resigned from YDF from all his posts in 2014 to campaign for BJP (Ruling party of India).

The new luxury train Tejas: Destined for failure?

0

Indian Railways is the largest rail network in Asia and the world’s second largest network operated under a single management. It is also the eighth largest employer in the world with about 1.4 million staff.

An organization of this size and of high importance to massive Indian population has not really evolved as expected and a tweet posted by me on 26th Apr 2017 summarizes the core issue related to disproportionate growth of railway traffic and infrastructure since independence.

Mr. Suresh Prabhu, the Hon. Railway Minister of India, is a man with the mission to change this equation. He is relentlessly working to overhaul Indian railways with several ambitious programs such as infrastructure improvement, digitization of supply chain, faster booking of train tickets, Clean My Coach service, stations redevelopment, free wi-fi at stations, etc.

The latest feather in his cap is the launch of Tejas, a luxury train between Mumbai and Goa (Karmali). This boasts of several modern facilities such as superior seats, infotainment screens, GPS based information systems, special food menu, tea/coffee vending machines, CCTV cameras, smoke and fire detection systems, etc.

Tejas (meaning lustre or brilliance) certainly appears to be a finely knitted offering which will phenomenally improve the train travel experience but will this necessarily become a commercial success for Indian Railways?

Let’s compare the travel fares

    • A one-way executive class ticket from Mumbai to Goa in Tejas would cost anywhere between INR 2,585-3,090. This could go up to INR 3,460 for a Tatkal ticket
    • The 2AC class ticket in another Mumbai to Goa train Konkan Kanya express is INR 1,480 and in Jan Shatabdi chair car, it is INR 980
    • The prevailing air ticket price for economy class on the same route for the most dates in June is as low as INR 1,688 (the cost has been taken from one of the leading travel portal and it is an all inclusive cost for a no frill seat)
    • Evaluating different options, a round trip to Goa for a family of four would cost as below:
      Travel Option Apx. Round Trip Cost (INR)
      Tejas – Executive Class 21,000-27,000
      Other Trains – AC Class 8,000-12,000
      Air Travel – Economy Class 12,000-18,000
      Taxi* 10,000-16000
      Own Car 7,500-10,000

      *Apx 600 KMs distance one-way, costing anywhere between INR 9-13/KM.

Clearly, the fully loaded executive class travel of Tejas would be the costliest option, unless someone tries to book air travel at the eleventh hour or books for a peak holiday season. Does premium pricing work for Indian Railways?

In 2014, Premium trains were started on certain routes to provide assured booking directly to passengers (agents not allowed and only e-tickets booking) at an ever increasing dynamic price. Under the surge pricing scheme, the fares increased with every 10% of the tickets sold in Rajdhani, Duronto and Shatabdi trains. In some cases, the fares were as high as 50% of the base fare on routes such as Goa, Mumbai and Kochi. However, this model did not click with the price conscious Indian travelers. While the other trains were running fully packed, with long waiting lists, the Premium trains were running at 30% occupancy levels.

People, who could afford the higher fare, switched to air travel as the tickets to such destinations are often available at prices as low as INR 2,000-3,000. Mr. Prabhu has himself conceded in the past, “Railways is losing high-end traffic to air and low-end passenger traffic to roads.”

Then came in Suvidha trains, which were started to clear holidays and festival rush at a higher price. This also failed to significantly impress the travelers and resulted in about 1.5 lakhs vacant berths per day during lean season. To cover up this deficit, an Alternate train accommodation scheme (ATAS), which is also known as Vikalap Scheme, was launched in beginning April 2017.

Describing the scheme as “passenger friendly”, Prabhu said, “Some of our premier trains run with vacant berths at times and we hope those can be filled up through scaling up Vikalp scheme. It is for the passengers’ benefit.” This scheme aims to optionally allot waitlisted passengers of other trains into the next premier and special service, without any extra cost.

Tejas may not shine

The point is very clear– Indian Railways has not been successful in the premium pricing segment yet. It is more of an affordable travel medium for masses. People will either not travel or will switch to other modes of transport rather than paying a premium to Railways.

It will be a big mistake to get carried away by the initial euphoria in booking for the inaugural run. Generally, anything above INR 2,000 fare does not seem to work for the train travel, no matter how superior the services and amenities are. Even Airlines resort to discount sales, cashbacks and bonus air miles to clear inventory during the lean seasons and high occupancy is observed only when the fare is in acceptable limits. This is a harsh reality– the sooner Indian Railways accept this, the better it would be.

I personally make multiple long distance train trips every year and would be extremely happy if Tejas succeeds commercially and proves me wrong!

Will our academia be ever free of hypocrite liberals?

0

Recent reports of furore over a planned Yajna before the kick-start to a symposium titled Nationalistic Journalism in Current Scenario: Media and Myth, at Delhi’s Indian Institute of Mass Communication (IIMC) on May 20, has once again laid bare the hypocrisy of left liberals, who continue to occupy Indian academia exercising disproportionate influence in the public sphere.

Looking to find more details about the event, I stumbled upon a pro-RSS writer Prathak Batohi’s Facebook post, which gives a good background on the event. Quite clearly, the organizers have an RSS background and conducting Yajna might indeed be their idea of Hindutva assertion in a left dominated IIMC but doesn’t it exposes the hypocrisies of  advocates of free speech that instead of countering the content of symposium itself, they chose to target Yajna, exposing their virulent hatred for anything representing Indian culturalism. And this while shamelessly participating and organizing the Iftar parties across the Universities during Ramzan.

It is also ironical, those who raised slogans demanding Azaadi from India and later from RSS (a change in script as advised by sympathetic news traders) and vowed to fight with all their might to this effect, are suddenly getting scared by a simple Vedic practice of Yajna.

It is the time to say enough is enough to this abhorrent hypocrisies of the left liberals. They have occupied our places of learning for far too long oppressing ideas in conflict with theirs, turning campuses into battlefields by getting into confrontation, often violent, with differing ideologies while conveniently blaming the others abetted by media shops. The seats of intellectual openness have become stifled where dissent is shouted down as saffronization and fascism. And yet claim moral high ground on free speech, tolerance etc.

It will only be proper that the revolution which brought the voice of ordinary and non-privileged people to the forefront and made it the mainstream of this nation’s discourse also finds its way into our academia and truly democratizes those spaces. Sooner the better.

PM Modi’s Make in India- Building the new economic super power in Asia

0

India’s economic growth for 2016-17 stands at a staggering 7.3% yet the country cannot create enough jobs to lift its people from poverty even when having a labor force of 500 million people. Yet 49% are employed in the agricultural sector which only contributes to 14% of the country’s economy.

It’s these contradictions that Prime Minister Narendra Modi wants to change under the Make In India project. This initiative seeks to transform India into a manufacturing hub for vehicles electronic systems pharmaceuticals as well as a hub for hydrocarbon and nuclear energy. This colossal task is the greatest economic reform in modern Indian history that seeks to unleash country’s true potential. Yet change comes at a price. In this report we will analyze the make in India initiative and explain what obstacles the Prime Minister faces and how he intends to solve them.

Primary purpose behind the make in India initiative is not just to transform the economy but to create new jobs. This is one of PM Modi’s top economic priorities. In a land of 1.2 billion people it should come as no surprise that every month nearly a million citizens enter the job market. This makes managing unemployment in India a daunting task. PM Modi’s plan to stimulate economic growth starts with reforming the labor legislation. Presently Indian labor laws make it very hard for companies to accelerate growth thus even though the economy grows at a pace of 7%, it has not yielded more jobs. As a result instead of seeking formal jobs the majority of Indians turned to the informal market. This includes jobs with no fixed incomes and systematic work conditions; such as construction workers mechanics shopkeepers. Currently about 80% of Indians (500 million labor force) is employed in the informal economy.

Ironically Indian labor laws which were meant to protect workers in a formal economy have actually hurt the job market and stimulated an informal economy and poverty. Hence, PM Modi is seeking to pass several legislation that would reform the labor laws. He has already reduced a number of labor laws from 44 to just 5 core legislation, improving the ease of business in India. For example, company registration has become super fast with digitization of whole process. However, the Prime Minister has reached a political dead end. For instance, in September 2015, labor unions affiliated with the political opposition party, Indian National Congress, who represent about 150 million workers launched a nationwide strike. Since then, PM Modi has backed down and there have been no signs that further the core labor laws will change anytime soon. Since his labor laws reforms have reached a political stalemate.

But PM Modi has shifted to stimulate growth by manipulating the monetary policy, in other words, by cutting the interest rates. But here too, PM Modi has reached an impasse. Raghuram Rajan and Urjit Patel the former and present chief executives of the Reserve Bank of India have refused to lower the interest rates below 6.5%. Both men argued that by cutting interest rates Indian banks would give out more loans creating more jobs and small businesses but it would also devalue the currency, meaning inflation would rise. Though, many will argue that leaders must focus on long-term objectives.

However, as an elected official while these actions have electoral consequences, many of his objectives tend to focus on short-term policies. On the other hand Rajan and Patel as appointed public officials have the freedom to focus on long term objectives. So even though PM Modi fully understands that inflation will hurt the economy in the long term, he needs to present short-term results. Rajan resigned from his office in early September yet before he left he established the monetary policy committee. This group consists of six people is responsible for setting the interest rates. Thus even in the absence of Rajan, PM Modi will have a hard time adjusting the interest rates. Ultimately though monetary manipulation is not a substitute for genuine growth.

PM Modi’s desire to reform the economy also depends on the business environment which requires a decent infrastructure and clear tax regimes. According to the government’s five-year plan India needs to invest about one trillion dollars to modernize its railways ports roads highways bridges, digitizing its economy and more. This estimate for 2012 to 2017 amounts to 200 billion dollars annually. However India’s national budget for 2016 stands at 289 billion dollars. In other words, New Delhi does not nearly have enough money to modernize the infrastructure by itself instead. This needs to be funded by the private sector to raise the necessary funds. PM Modi must rely on foreign direct investment.

The attempts to acquire more investment is already yielding results. In 2015, India received a record 40 billion dollar in foreign direct investment, which is an increase of 30 percent compared to the previous year. Yet as high as this amount is not sufficient to fully modernize the business environment India requires. An annual foreign direct investment of at least 100 billion dollars, in fact, the total amount of required foreign direct investment is even higher when one considers the other segments of the economic reforms. The make in India initiative also seeks to increase the manufacturing sector share of the economy from 16% to 25% by 2022.

The government believes that this would yield in at least 100 million jobs in the manufacturing sector and this is where the Make In India initiatives comes full circle for India to achieve such goals and to attract the necessary foreign direct investment. New Delhi must perform its labor and land acquisition laws as well as its tax regimes as improving the business environment also depends on land acquisition laws, better tax system with GST and digitizing of various process. Government of India has made securing Intellectual Property Rights completely digital one superb example is Trademark Registration, which is online and is processed in a few days.

Currently India’s land acquisition law of 2013 requires companies to obtain approval from at least 70% of the local residents before acquiring the land. Since nearly 70% of Indians live in villages the acquisition law complicates matters for companies seeking to expand their base of operations in India. PM Modi is trying to adjust the acquisition law but since the legislation has a direct impact on the majority of Indians it’s an extremely difficult task. One more legislation that the Prime Minister is seeking to adjust is the Goods and Services Tax bill, also known as GST bill. Basically the legislation seeks to introduce value-added tax in India which is a common consumption tax in Europe and many other countries. For outsiders this is hard to imagine. But in India every state has a different tax code as a result one cannot freely transport goods within India. Instead one has to stop at the state borders and pay the entry tax. The biggest complication with these tax regimes is not the tax fee but the dreadful paper work which can take up those several hours.

Obviously, this hinders further economic growth. PM Modi is successfully able to pass GST bill which is most revolutionary tax change in India ever since its independence. This will further boost Indian economy.

भ्रष्ट देशद्रोहियों से निपटने में मोदी सरकार नाकाम?

वरिष्ठ कांग्रेसी नेता और पूर्व केंद्रीय मंत्री पी चिदंबरम के सुपुत्र कार्ति चिदंबरम लन्दन भाग गए हैं. लन्दन भागने के बाद कार्ति चिदंबरम पर प्रवर्तन निदेशालय (ईडी) ने केंद्रीय जांच ब्यूरो (सीबीआई) द्वारा दर्ज भ्रष्टाचार के मामले के आधार पर उनके खिलाफ मनी लांड्रिंग (धनशोधन) का एक मामला दर्ज किया है.

ऐसा पहली बार नहीं हुआ है कि जब कोई व्यक्ति पहली बार देश छोड़कर भागा हो. इससे पहले ललित मोदी और विजय माल्या भी लन्दन भाग चुके हैं और इन दोनों को भी सरकार पकड़कर वापस लाने में पूरी तरह नाकाम रही है.

कार्ति चिदंबरम पर आपराधिक साजिश रचने, धोखाधड़ी, भ्रष्ट या अवैध तरीके से फायदा उठाने, सरकारी अधिकारी को प्रभावित करने तथा आपराधिक आचरण का आरोप लगाया गया है. सवाल यह उठ रहा है कि पी चिदंबरम, कार्ति चिदंबरम और लल्लू यादव पर जो हालिया छापेमारी हुई है, क्या उसके मद्देनज़र सरकार और सरकारी एजेंसियों को पहले से ही इस बात का अंदेशा नहीं हो जाना चाहिए था कि यह सब लोग या इनमे से कोई भी व्यक्ति देश छोड़कर भाग सकता है. क्या सरकार ललित मोदी और विजय माल्या के भागने से कोई भी सबक लेने को तैयार नहीं है? जब इतने बड़े पैमाने पर छापामारी किसी व्यक्ति पर की जा रही है तो जाहिर है कि उसकी पूरी और पक्की खबर सरकारी एजेंसियों के पास पहले से रही होगी. अगर खबर पहले से थी, तो इन लोगों के पासपोर्ट जब्त क्यों नहीं किये गए. क्या हमारी सरकारें छापामारी करके इस बात का इंतज़ार करती रहती हैं कि जब यह व्यक्ति देश छोड़कर भाग जाएगा, फिर उसके खिलाफ मामला दर्ज़ किया जाएगा, ताकि यह भी लगे कि सरकार कार्यवाही कर रही है और अपराधी का भी बाल-बांका न होने पाए.

हालांकि पी चिदंबरम का यह कहना कि उनके बेटे कार्ति चिदंबरम जल्द ही वापस लौटेंगे, लेकिन खुद पी चिदंबरम कब तक भारत में रहेंगे, फिलहाल तो उसी पर संशय बना हुआ है.

सोनिया, राहुल, लल्लू, चिदंबरम, माया, मुलायम जैसे लोगों ने कोई नया कारनामा नहीं किया है. इनके किये गए पुराने कारनामे ही वक्त-वेवक्त इन्हे भारी मुसीबत में डालने के लिए काफी हैं. लेकिन वह मुसीबत आने से पहले ही होता यह है कि जब तक भी इन जैसे लोगों पर कोई सरकारी एजेंसी अपना शिकंजा कस्ती है, उससे पहले ही यह देश छोड़कर जा चुके होते हैं. यह सब एक सोची समझी साज़िश के तहत नहीं होता है, इस पर यकीन करना मुश्किल लगता है. अगर सरकार की नीयत साफ़ है तो ऐसे सभी लोगों के पासपोर्ट जब्त क्यों नहीं कर लेती, जिन पर इस तरह के संगीन आरोप लगे हुए हैं, ऐसे लोगों को सिर्फ उन्ही देशों कि यात्रा करने की इज़ाज़त मिलनी चाहिए, जहां से इन्हे वापस बुलाना आसान हो.

सरकार का निकम्मापन सिर्फ इसी मामले में दिखाई नहीं दे रहा है. कश्मीर में सरकार जो कुछ भी कर रही है, वह किसी भी समझदार व्यक्ति के गले नहीं उतर रहा है. हुर्रियत के आतंकवादियों को पाकिस्तान सरकार पैसा भेज रही है, उस पैसे से पत्थर बाज़ों को भुगतान किया जा रहा है. हुर्रियत के इन्ही लोगों पर खुद हमारी सरकार भी करोड़ों रुपया पानी की तरह बहा रही है. जिन लोगों के देशद्रोही होने में किसी को भी संदेह नहीं है, उन्हें हमारी सरकार जनता से वसूले गए टेक्स के पैसों से ऐयाशी करवा रही है. हुर्रियत,मुफ्ती और अब्दुल्ला बाप बेटे कब तक इस देश की जनता के खून पसीने की कमाई पर गुलछर्रे उड़ाते रहेंगे, इसका जबाब भी मोदी सरकार को जल्द से जल्द देना है.

Did Catch News outsource its take on 3 years of Modi sarkar to the Congress social media team?

We get it. The good folks at Catch do not think highly of Prime Minister Modi.  It’s no surprise then that Catch would carry an article titled  “Dear Mr. Modi, the only growth you have achieved is in propaganda“.

But there is something curious (sinister?) going on with this article. First, I want you to take a look at the article as it is advertised on Catch-News main page.

catch1

As you can see clearly in the screenshot, the article has been written by “Catch Team”.

At this point, you might ask. So what? What’s the big deal about a news website posting its take on 3 years of the Modi government?

Give me a moment then to click on the article and see what comes up. Here’s the screenshot.

catch2

Well, no surprises here. The expanded view only tells us that this article was posted by “Catch Team”, last updated at 18:42 IST on May 20, 2017.

Now the fun begins. Scroll down to the bottom of the article. Here’s what you get.

catch6

It now says that the writer is the social media in charge of the Indian National Congress and also says that the opinions are the personal views of the author. Even the times mentioned at the top and at the bottom of the post are identical : May 20, 2017 at 18:42 IST.

Only the author has changed from “Catch Team” at the top to “social media in charge of the Congress” at the bottom.

So who really wrote this? Did the Congress social media in charge write the official take of “Catch Team” on 3 years of Modi government? Or was it the other way around?

Or maybe they wrote it together? Did “Catch Team” sit down with the social media cell of the Congress party and prepare a joint statement on 3 years of Modi government?

We might have stumbled on to something here … and it seems to be very interesting.

I am sure a reputed and honest organization like Catchnews will have a simple and satisfactory explanation for this. I am sure they will clear all our doubts. And we can go back to treating Catch as a trustworthy news source. Like always…

Pro TipYou can’t delete stuff from the Google web cache.

How Indian economy reacted during the last six months after Demonetization

0

The Turning Point

Before the demonized memories of people standing in long queues outside ATMs and the awe and confusion of the banking activities fades off, let’s recall the Modi’s revolutionary verdict.

On November 8, 2016, the government of India implemented demonetization by recalling Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes which were in circulation. Deadlines were given to exchange the old notes with the new one. Simultaneously, the idea of going cashless is put forward aiming at digitizing the Indian Economy.

Government’s Vision

The Government in its union budget for 2017-18, has outlined various recommendations for promoting cashless transactions, to ease out the mass anguish.

Moreover, various discounts and freebies were discussed and implemented for digital transactions. The emphasis on a cashless economy is outraged to the majority of Indian people who are still outside the banking sector.

However, the government under Modi-ship had taken a series of pre- planned steps. They implemented “bank account for all” mission, yet a majority has not enrolled in the scheme.

Only a few are aware of the ‘going cashless’ methods, literacy in digitization is yet to be earned for a majority. The relevance of the topic stands between such illiterate majority and the benefits for the nation in a cashless economy.

Economy: Going Cashless

India is on its way of becoming a Cashless economy. It will have an economic system where the transaction of money is in digital form other than transacting them in cash.

For example, purchasing a mobile phone using debit or credit card or even through a net/mobile banking transaction comes under the former category and buying it with cash is the latter.

In short, cashless transaction means money is being credited to the account of the seller by debiting the account of the buyer. Only numbers are getting transacted with the approval and one number is being transacted from one account to another. Here, the mobilization of liquid cash is nil.

“Demonetization”: A Boom

Let us navigate through the effects of India going cashless since last six months,

  • Transparency
    Each and every transaction is being accounted. It not only enhances the transparency of transactions, rather curbs corruption and criminal activities which is rampant in the country.
  • Black Money
    The scope for money laundering is limited. Moreover fake currency which accounted to a 1/7th of the total currency was swept off from the system.
  • Better deployment of Government Funds
    The government can channelize its resources. In 2015, Rs. 25 billion were spent on printing currency notes
  • Tax Transparency
    Collection of Tax has improved. Majority of the transactions are being made through banks, the government agencies scrutinizes each transaction and verify if the appropriate tax proceeds are received.
  • Handling Cost Minimized
    The risk and cost of handling currency is minimized. Rather focus on automated banking services has increased manifolds.
  • Regularization of Government policies
    The scope for parallel financing is curbed. The government is now investing in welfare schemes, subsidies, providing aids and grants without any misappropriations.

Transparency International, a global consortium reported that owing to cashless economy drive the crime rate dipped in Sweden, in 2011.

The Real Challenge

With a sudden outbreak of the verdict for a radical change in the transaction mode caused a mass unrest. But the brighter side to it was that the nation had taken a leap towards a cashless economy.

The usage of debit/credit cards in December 2016 almost doubled compared to the previous months and is progressing. However, the allegations are still alive that the Government has not envisaged the limitations in India for practising cashless transactions to a core level.

Some challenges are,

  • Digital divide
    Only 35% are using internet in India. There is lack of uniform access of internet facility across the length and breadth of the nation.
  • Illiteracy
    According to Price Water Hoopers, more than 200 million people are still outside the purview of the banking sector. Neither have they opened accounts nor are using it regularly. Moreover, people are unaware about the usage of debit and credit cards.
  • Resistance to change
    Due to lack of knowledge and access majority of the people are not comfortable in using digital transactions. Moreover, added charges on banking transactions, fuel surcharge etc. demotivate people from going cashless.
  • E-Governance
    The government have to adopt more stringent policies or laws to govern digital transactions. It is alleged that the prevailing laws and regimes are not appropriate in handling cyber crimes.

Though the freebies and discounts available for promoting digital economy are available, the approach of the public for going cashless values more in this context. If the practice of usage of plastic cards or online transactions cannot be visualized in reality, spending nature of individuals may adversely affect particularly for spendthrifts; and they may pull back from such transactions eventually.

The implementation of more POS machines, campaigns on digital transactions and rework on the fundamentals may ease the transactions, the improve its usage and paves the way to the economic stability of the nation.

The author is affiliated with QuickCompany which deals in Company Registration, Trademark registration and Other Legal Activities.

Hindu Astrology: The forgotten science

0

Astrology needs no introduction. Its used in almost every important walk of our life. This science has been passed onto us by our ancestors who themselves were great practitioners and expert predictors. In fact, astrology is also an important part of Vedangas, meaning this knowledge was imparted by Gurus to their Shishyas in ancient India, which ensured its continuation.

In the course of time, our country faced many invasions, and the subsequent establishment of foreigners’ rule, which systematically tried to erode our culture and practices by replacing it with their own. Although damages were done, they were not significant enough to totally wipe out our culture. The fact that astrology is still practiced today is a testament in itself.

Now, there are proponents and objectors of this science. Why I am calling it science is because astrology is based on mathematical calculations, based on which planets are aligned and after which predictions made. Proponents say this is a gift from our ancient Rishis, while those against it say this is pure superstition that does not hold water in our modern world. The problem is that the latter have not provided solid arguments to defuse the backers of astrology. The only premise on which they are basing their argument is that astrologers often go wrong in making predictions and that the astrologers’ community do not concur among themselves. Here lies the problem. Those against astrology have always run into ‘pseudo-astrologers’ and not genuine ones. Had they come across real ones, they would have found it difficult to counter them. Moreover, genuine astrologers are very difficult to find nowadays. BV Raman, KN Rao, etc are some of the astrologers who have done extensive original research in the area of astrology and also made fairly successful predictions.

The point here to make is that astrology as a subject should not be disputed, but astrologers must be. Astrologers making wrong predictions does not mean that astrology is a fake science. Its the astrologers who must be taken to task for misguiding the people and bringing disrepute to this ancient science. The stupid daily predictions supposedly based on one’s zodiac sign that we see on our idiot boxes (TV) everyday must end. This has done serious damage to the profession of astrology. But that does not even seem to be on the horizon. And this continues to give more ammunition to the opponents to target and tarnish astrology.

The current govt. must seriously think about introducing astrology as a subject of study. It must also devise ways to end this stupid everyday predictions that has done more harm than good to astrology. Courts have already given a favourable verdict to astrology, so there is no need to worry from that end. The only thing the govt must ensure is that people should have access to genuine astrology and astrologers. That will certainly preserve the science and will also attract more students towards it.

Women are worthier than just producing kids after marriage

0

I cannot change things which I don’t approve of, but I can try not to do the same myself. The problem is people won’t let me try, because we love to talk about changes, but hate to be the change agent. We see quality life-changing films, and come out of theatre talking about what food to eat next rather than discuss what’s really wrong with our society and how we can fix it; basically, convenience over applying any sense. The mentality of the majority is the by-product of our socio-political condition, we dare not think something different from the majority, and hope to succeed, because that works only in scripted movies and some astray cases, not in real life.

I cannot live a life similar to this or that person, I want to carve out a new path for myself, I don’t care if it doesn’t have a precedent, because I know I have the willingness and dedication to walk on my path. Tomorrow, whatever happens will be a result of my decision and I won’t blame anyone but myself for my failures, and for the fear of failures I cannot live a default scripted lifestyle cut out for women. People who love me will remain by my side, and people who chose to judge me and leave me cos I followed a different path never loved me in the first place.

I love children but I don’t see myself as a mother figure (currently), and I feel that this should be an enough reason for people to stop popping the “when are you planning to take a kid” question, but sadly these things don’t matter to people. What matters to them is age, society and the fact that they need a toy to play with. I cannot just produce a kid because others want a grandkid, cousin or niece. I don’t think I am cheating my husband if I don’t want to have a kid, as I still do love him, and I don’t think that making a kid together is the essential prove of my love. Here I am trying to bridge the gap between me and my spouse, trying to build a new foundation, trying to eke out a decent living, do things which I was never able to do because of lack of money, time and so many things, and on the other side of the spectrum people are busy asking me for good news.

It sometimes feel that my worth is nothing if I don’t produce a kid at an appropriate time. Why can’t I just live for myself, follow my dreams and live according to my wish for some time. I know there is no end to wishes and dreams, but frankly speaking I have not covered even 10% of my dream list. I have made it till here all by myself, and I think I will be able to take the decision when to stop the relentless pursuing of dreams. What is there not to understand in such a simple thing? I don’t want a kid since I am not ready, and if I am not ready then who the hell will feed, nourish, trim and prep my kid for the world? How can people not understand something as basic as that and still ask you to get pregnant because the clock is ticking.

Well, fuck the clock! I am selfish, sallow and self-absorbed. I am afraid I won’t have time for myself, I am afraid my body will change, I am afraid of the pain , and there is nothing wrong in me when I think about myself. I am not some altruistic saint, and I don’t want to be on. To all the “clock ticking” lecturers; what if I go through with giving birth, banking on suddenly having all of my feelings changed as soon as that child is in my hands, but the feelings don’t change? Now I’m stuck being a mother, when that’s really not what I want to be. I’d rather not be a mother at all than be one who deeply regrets it. Not only would I be miserable, but my child would be too.

Why does everything needs to be time bound? If I am supposed or destined to have a kid I will have one, so I don’t need to listen to your “wait till you get older” shit. Suppose hell falls on me and, tomorrow I am not able to conceive, big deal! Why can’t I adopt one? I will love him to no ends, because I don’t need the “coming out of my womb “ feeling to love that kid like a mother.

All the above in no way means that I will never want a kid in future, cos live changes and along with it changes your priority. Oh, I guess I’ll have a kid or two at some point of time, but right now, I don’t know what exactly this means . As of today, I don’t want one, but I still want to feel loved, not considered selfish, or less worthy of being a women.

The rising girl power in India

0

In my school days (I passed 10th standard in 1992 under the state examination system of Odisha, India), I often observed that girls would outshine boys in the school board exams in terms of passing percentage. However, their representation among the top-ranking students used to be extremely low. It was invariably and overwhelmingly dominated by boys. However, steadily over the last couple of decades, girls have displaced boys in the toppers’ list. Moreover, there has been a steady visible increase in female presence in the higher learning institutes of India. These are welcome trends, especially in a country which has been largely a male-dominated society.

Now, let us contrast it with the Indian society’s attitude towards the girl child. One of the indicators through which it can be examined is sex-ratio, i.e., number of females per a thousand of males. As per the last census in 2011, the sex ratio of India is 940. This is an improvement as this figure had hovered around 930 for last four decades. Nevertheless, India’s sex ratio is abysmally low when compared to other regions of world. Sex-ratios in Europe, North America, Latin America, Caribbean, Sub Saharan Africa, and South East Asia are all 1000 or more, showing a greater degree of gender equity. In general, women outlive men because of their greater resistance to disease and death. Due to their higher life expectancy, in a gender-neutral society, women tend to be more in number compared to men, particularly in the older age group.

India’s low sex ratio is only comparable to the Arab world or that of China. The more disturbing figure for India is that the child sex ratio (0-6yrs) has been on a continuous decline since the last half-a-century; from 976 in 1961 to 914 in 2011. Child sex-ratio shows the underlying socio-cultural setting of a society, especially in its attitude towards the girl child. A falling child-sex ratio indicates increased preference for boys which is manifested in the prevalence of female foeticide, infanticide, abandonment of female babies, and neglect of girl children.

All the same, I do believe a turnaround is possible. The key to this possibility is greater female education at all levels. The correlation between Kerala’s high female education (it has the highest female literacy among all states and UTs) and favorable sex-ratio (Kerala’s sex-ratio is 1084) is not a mere coincidence. At its minimum, rise in female education would lead to improvement in the quality of life for women.

Educated women will be able to assert their position both within and outside the family. There has been an improvement in female basic literacy in the last two decades. As per the census data, male-female literacy gap, which remained consistent at about 25% points from 1961 to 1991, declined to 21.6% in 2001 and to 16.7% in 2011. This gap should further decline in the future. My hope comes from my recent field study in Odisha’s rural areas, where I have witnessed groups of young girls cycling to their schools and colleges. I see a similar scene every morning, when scores of girls traverse the road in front of my institute gate that leads to M.S. Ramaiah groups of institutions, Bangalore, India. Be it a remote village in Odisha or a colony in Bangalore city, girls are gradually not only outnumbering boys in educational institutions, but also outmatching them in performances.

Women well-being is complementary to the development of a society. Prof. Amartya Sen, the Nobel laureate in Economics, has advocated in his book ‘Development as Freedom’ the notion that societies need to see women as active participants and not as passive recipients of help. Women education is instrumental in preventing population explosion and improving quality of both individual and family life. Literature shows positive effects of female education on fostering economic growth and combating poverty and child mortality. Women in control of their household’s resources spend more on basic necessities and on the development of their children’s potential than men do in similar circumstances. This feature has been demonstrated in women self-help-groups and studies show this to be valid in larger public spaces and affairs.

With steady improvement in educational status for women, India’s future can only be better. The cascading benefits of women education would get reflected in girls’ performance in all walks of life and other socio-economic development indicators. I believe, in two generations’ time, the majority of important posts in India will go to women. And more power to females would be certainly healthy for the society. After all, contrary to the common belief, the female, with her tougher immune system, is actually the stronger gender.

 

The author is an Assistant Professor at National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS), Bangalore. Currently he is a Visiting Fellow (Subir Chowdhry Fellow 2016-17) at the India Observatory, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.