Supreme Court on Sabarimala Issue

Is the constitution a strait jacket? No, it leaves a plenty of room to change and it makes no attempt to regulate every aspect of human life.

Do we need to change customs and traditions because they discriminate women, if they do not endanger or detrimental to the advancement of women?

It is very sad to see that when there are many real and hurtful incidents happening against women in various parts of India, the Sabarimala women petitioners have managed to find time, money and other resources to indulge in a court case where not a single woman is getting hurt.

आए दिन हिंदू मान्यताओं की ना सिर्फ़ मज़ाक उड़ाई जाती हैं बल्कि उनको पिछड़ा और नीचतम कह के उनकी इज़्ज़त भी उतरी जाती हैं: और इन सब में सुप्रीम कोर्ट भी सहभागी बन रही है

Not just Sabarimala, but there is no specific sanction in any Hindu scriptures to impose gender bias in Temples: did supreme court not review Hindu scriptures before passing its judgement?

With the temple due to open today evening for its annual season that last for 56 days, a last ditch effort to find a solution also seems to have ended?