Fashion of abusing Hindu Culture

Not just Sabarimala, but there is no specific sanction in any Hindu scriptures to impose gender bias in Temples: did supreme court not review Hindu scriptures before passing its judgement?

Do these liberals not find patriarchy among Muslims and Christians and raise their voice?

He did it, and did it intentionally, a plan that had been formulated well in advance – as it seems; the way this gentleman is unapologetic and  has chosen to ignore voice of dissent.

Prayagraj is 'Tilak' to our sacred culture and therefore every Indian who follows the sacred Hindu culture will be proud over the proposal.

Reconstruction of Rama Temple doesn’t signify the ‘Making of Hindu Rastra’ but reaffirms that no temples, no mosques, no churches will be destroyed ever and if anyone dares to, We will fight against them and get it constructed back.

Clarifying some doubts of Barkha Dutt, and specially in her recent story was titled ‘Shame at Sabarimala’.

Mr. Rajdeep and Ramachandra Guha conveniently use Gandhi ji to shield their views, but mock him for his views about religious conversions and moral values.

The age-old tradition is not based on ‘discrimination’ but is based on ‘distinction.’

If we do not reveal the truth of our past, how our glory was ruined by invaders, our generation will not sustain as Hindu.

The SC should have avoided itself from delivering the verdict for those who are not even going to worship at Sabarimala but has fueled the peaceful devotees of lord Ayappa.