Ayodhya Ram Temple

बाबर विदेशी हमलावर, हमारा शत्रु था। बाबर के संबंध में गुरु नानकदेवजी ने कहा है, बाबर का राज माने पाप की बारात। उस बाबर ने मंदिर तोडा, उस बाबरी ढांचे के लिए चिल्लाना यह अराष्ट्रीयता है।

A living legend and with the truest and the purest form of secularism: K K Muhammed (ASI)

The building of Lord Ram in Ajodhya is not a symbolic. It is revival and accentuation of concept of Lord Ram.

अगर मक्का या वेटिकन सिटी जैसे किसी विशेष विश्वास की जगह पर उनके पूजा स्थल को तोड़कर किसी अन्य धर्म का पूजा स्थल बनाया होता तो क्या ऐसा संभव था? अगर एक बार ऐसा मान भी ले तो समाधान की क्या संभावनाए होगी?

Some great similarities between Indian and Greece culture.

We should remember that the destruction of Ram Mandir was more than just material damage to a property. It was destruction of cultural heritage and a symbol of subjugation.

The government can build the Ram Mandir wherever it wants and whenever it wants and that too within the legal and constitutional framework of the country.

Editorial after editorial in the mainstream print media have presented a bleak picture on the move stating that it would rob away the premise on which this government stands: ‘sab ka sath, sab ka vikas’ and would not benefit the party electorally.

Ram Mandir construction seems possible by this move, BJP seems to be successful in retaining its core vote bank before election.

Not that one needs to turn into a fatalist, but one needs to exercise perseverance, for justice hurried is justice buried.