Mughal atrocities

Rana's article starts with the usual ignorance of many bad deeds by conquerors to the good deeds of few and generalizing over the good deeds done by the few. She has comfortably chosen data from 1600 AD to 1870 AD to support her hypothesis.

Kurumbera Fort, once built as a Mandir, where Sri Ram Chandra & Sita Mata believed to have had spent some time nearby during their 14 yrs of exile, was attacked by Islamic invader Aurangzeb and then never restored as temple again!

British kept on blaming Hindus for poor conditions of Muslims in India. Winston Churchill who ignored how English butchered Irish people started blaming Brahmins for everything.

Here are some facts about Akbar which will make you think whether he deserves to be in out history books or not.

From outside India appears to be a diverse country with multiculturalism at its maximum, but from within, we are hollow.

Their contribution to present India is far-reaching, yet grossly neglected by our own historians who were enamoured by the western view of Indian history.

No matter how "barbaric and violent" the Rajputs’ claims sound, try to understand where this anger stems from instead of dismissing them as violent.